agentic-scorecard 0.3.0 → 0.4.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (31) hide show
  1. package/AGENT_PROMPT.md +68 -52
  2. package/README.md +50 -37
  3. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapter-contract.md +129 -0
  4. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-agent-harnesses.yaml +266 -0
  5. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-ci-providers.yaml +57 -0
  6. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-command-wrappers.yaml +37 -0
  7. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-environment-tooling.yaml +17 -0
  8. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-github-conventions.yaml +27 -0
  9. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-python-tooling.yaml +15 -0
  10. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-security-tools.yaml +45 -0
  11. package/benchmark/v0.4/adapters/known-verification-tools.yaml +65 -0
  12. package/benchmark/v0.4/agent-evidence-schema.json +74 -0
  13. package/benchmark/v0.4/attestation-schema.json +35 -0
  14. package/benchmark/v0.4/benchmark.yaml +127 -0
  15. package/benchmark/v0.4/calibration-matrix.md +60 -0
  16. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/context.yaml +75 -0
  17. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/environment.yaml +93 -0
  18. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/governance.yaml +132 -0
  19. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/learning.yaml +78 -0
  20. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/observability.yaml +91 -0
  21. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/resilience.yaml +170 -0
  22. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/security.yaml +143 -0
  23. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/specification.yaml +65 -0
  24. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/testing.yaml +82 -0
  25. package/benchmark/v0.4/controls/tooling.yaml +69 -0
  26. package/benchmark/v0.4/report-schema.json +89 -0
  27. package/benchmark/v0.4/scoring-policy.md +175 -0
  28. package/dist/cli.js +2315 -162
  29. package/package.json +3 -2
  30. package/templates/agent-evidence.yaml +2 -2
  31. package/templates/attestations.yaml +3 -1
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
1
+ dimension: resilience
2
+ controls:
3
+ - id: ADRB-RES-001
4
+ level: 1
5
+ title: Changes have a documented recovery path
6
+ outcome: Contributors can locate actionable rollback, revert, recovery, or incident guidance.
7
+ risk: A harmful agent change persists because recovery is improvised under pressure.
8
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
9
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
10
+ evidence:
11
+ - type: content_terms
12
+ scope: repository
13
+ files:
14
+ [
15
+ README.md,
16
+ CONTRIBUTING.md,
17
+ AGENTS.md,
18
+ Agents.md,
19
+ agents.md,
20
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
21
+ .ai/Agents.md,
22
+ .ai/constitution.md,
23
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
24
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
25
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
26
+ .agents/**/*.md,
27
+ docs/recovery/**,
28
+ docs/operations/**,
29
+ docs/agentic/**,
30
+ runbooks/**,
31
+ ]
32
+ terms: [rollback, revert, recovery, incident, restore]
33
+ min_terms: 2
34
+ required_any_terms: [change, deployment, release, agent, task, pull request]
35
+ max_span_lines: 100
36
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
37
+ remediation: Document how to stop work, revert code, recover affected state, and escalate an incident.
38
+ - id: ADRB-RES-002
39
+ level: 2
40
+ title: Failure containment and stop conditions are documented
41
+ outcome: Agent guidance defines mutation limits, resource budgets, retry bounds, stop triggers, escalation, and recovery ownership.
42
+ risk: A looping or confused agent continues spending or mutating beyond the intended scope.
43
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
44
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
45
+ evidence:
46
+ - type: content_groups
47
+ scope: repository
48
+ files:
49
+ [
50
+ AGENTS.md,
51
+ Agents.md,
52
+ agents.md,
53
+ SECURITY.md,
54
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
55
+ .ai/Agents.md,
56
+ .ai/constitution.md,
57
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
58
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
59
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
60
+ .agents/**/*.md,
61
+ docs/agentic/**,
62
+ docs/recovery/**,
63
+ runbooks/**,
64
+ templates/**,
65
+ ]
66
+ groups:
67
+ - id: mutation-scope
68
+ terms:
69
+ [
70
+ mutation limit,
71
+ allowed mutation,
72
+ allowed mutations,
73
+ allowed tools and mutations,
74
+ permitted mutation,
75
+ permitted mutations,
76
+ allowed path,
77
+ allowed paths,
78
+ allowed prefix,
79
+ allowed prefixes,
80
+ write scope,
81
+ out of scope,
82
+ outside scope,
83
+ edit only,
84
+ do not edit,
85
+ do not continue outside allowed paths,
86
+ do not continue outside the allowed paths,
87
+ ]
88
+ - id: resource-bounds
89
+ terms:
90
+ [
91
+ resource budget,
92
+ token budget,
93
+ time budget,
94
+ cost budget,
95
+ tool call budget,
96
+ tool-call budget,
97
+ token limit,
98
+ time limit,
99
+ cost limit,
100
+ tool call limit,
101
+ tool-call limit,
102
+ wall clock limit,
103
+ wall-clock limit,
104
+ ]
105
+ - id: retry-bounds
106
+ terms: [retry limit, retry budget, max retries, bounded retries, maximum attempts]
107
+ - id: stop-trigger
108
+ terms:
109
+ [
110
+ stop condition,
111
+ stop and ask,
112
+ stop and surface,
113
+ stop safely,
114
+ must stop,
115
+ halt work,
116
+ abort,
117
+ do not continue,
118
+ kill switch,
119
+ ]
120
+ - id: escalation
121
+ terms:
122
+ [
123
+ escalation,
124
+ escalate,
125
+ ask the coordinator,
126
+ ask coordinator,
127
+ surface to coordinator,
128
+ hand back,
129
+ ask a human,
130
+ escalate to a human,
131
+ hand back to a human,
132
+ ]
133
+ - id: recovery-ownership
134
+ terms:
135
+ [
136
+ recovery owner,
137
+ rollback owner,
138
+ incident owner,
139
+ responsible for recovery,
140
+ recovery responsibility,
141
+ on-call owner,
142
+ ]
143
+ min_groups: 6
144
+ max_span_lines: 120
145
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
146
+ remediation: Add bounded scope, budget, retry, stop, escalation, and recovery requirements to task preflight.
147
+ - id: ADRB-RES-003
148
+ level: 3
149
+ title: Containment and recovery controls are exercised
150
+ outcome: Cancellation, credential revocation, rollback, timeout, and partial-failure recovery are tested.
151
+ risk: Recovery mechanisms exist on paper but fail when the harness behaves unexpectedly.
152
+ allow_attestation: true
153
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
154
+ evidence:
155
+ - type: manual
156
+ scope: organization
157
+ prompt: Show recent automated tests or exercises for stop, timeout, revocation, rollback, and partial failure.
158
+ remediation: Add failure-injection tests and periodic exercises for containment and reversible recovery.
159
+ - id: ADRB-RES-004
160
+ level: 4
161
+ title: Recovery outcomes drive improvement
162
+ outcome: Time-to-detect, time-to-stop, rollback success, impact, and recurrence trends improve containment.
163
+ risk: The same failure patterns repeat because recovery performance and residual impact are unknown.
164
+ allow_attestation: true
165
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
166
+ evidence:
167
+ - type: manual
168
+ scope: outcome
169
+ prompt: Provide recovery outcome trends and a recent containment or rollback improvement driven by them.
170
+ remediation: Trend containment and recovery outcomes and feed them into autonomy and tool design.
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
1
+ dimension: security
2
+ controls:
3
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-001
4
+ level: 1
5
+ title: Agent secret and sensitive-data boundaries are documented
6
+ outcome: Contributors can find agent-specific rules for credentials, secrets, and sensitive data.
7
+ risk: Agents expose credentials or sensitive data while planning, changing, or reporting work.
8
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
9
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
10
+ evidence:
11
+ - type: content_terms
12
+ scope: repository
13
+ files:
14
+ [
15
+ SECURITY.md,
16
+ AGENTS.md,
17
+ Agents.md,
18
+ agents.md,
19
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
20
+ .ai/Agents.md,
21
+ .ai/constitution.md,
22
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
23
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
24
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
25
+ .agents/**/*.md,
26
+ docs/security/**,
27
+ docs/agentic/**,
28
+ ]
29
+ terms: [secret, secrets, credential, credentials, sensitive data, personal data, PII]
30
+ min_terms: 2
31
+ max_span_lines: 80
32
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
33
+ remediation: Document agent-specific rules for secrets, credentials, sensitive data, logs, prompts, and generated artifacts.
34
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-002
35
+ level: 2
36
+ title: Agent data and autonomy boundaries are explicit
37
+ outcome: Agent preflight guidance binds permitted data, tools, mutations, approvals, and stop conditions.
38
+ risk: Operators grant more data or authority than the task requires.
39
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
40
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
41
+ evidence:
42
+ - type: content_terms
43
+ scope: repository
44
+ files:
45
+ [
46
+ SECURITY.md,
47
+ AGENTS.md,
48
+ Agents.md,
49
+ agents.md,
50
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
51
+ .ai/Agents.md,
52
+ .ai/constitution.md,
53
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
54
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
55
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
56
+ .agents/**/*.md,
57
+ docs/security/**,
58
+ docs/agentic/**,
59
+ templates/**,
60
+ ]
61
+ terms:
62
+ [
63
+ data classification,
64
+ allowed tools,
65
+ mutation,
66
+ budget,
67
+ human approval,
68
+ autonomy,
69
+ stop condition,
70
+ ]
71
+ min_terms: 3
72
+ max_span_lines: 120
73
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
74
+ remediation: Add a task preflight that binds data, tools, write scope, budget, approvals, and stop conditions.
75
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-006
76
+ level: 2
77
+ title: Security reporting and response are documented
78
+ outcome: Contributors can find a vulnerability-reporting or security-escalation path.
79
+ risk: Security concerns discovered during agent work lack an accountable response path.
80
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
81
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
82
+ evidence:
83
+ - type: content_terms
84
+ scope: repository
85
+ files: [SECURITY.md, docs/security/**, docs/contributing/**]
86
+ terms: [report, vulnerability, security contact, escalation, incident]
87
+ min_terms: 2
88
+ max_span_lines: 80
89
+ remediation: Publish a vulnerability-reporting and security-escalation path with response ownership.
90
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-003
91
+ level: 3
92
+ title: Automated secret-leakage safeguards are enforced
93
+ outcome: Repository or platform automation scans relevant changes for secrets before integration.
94
+ risk: Credentials can enter version history because secret safeguards are absent or merely documented.
95
+ allow_attestation: true
96
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
97
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository, platform]
98
+ evidence_mode: any
99
+ evidence:
100
+ - type: ci_command
101
+ scope: repository
102
+ min_tools: 1
103
+ - type: manual
104
+ scope: platform
105
+ prompt: Show that host-native secret scanning or push protection covers the assessed repository and relevant branches, including current status and controlled exceptions.
106
+ remediation: Run a secret-leakage safeguard in applicable CI or enable equivalent protected platform scanning with reviewable evidence.
107
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-007
108
+ level: 3
109
+ title: Untrusted agent-input safeguards are enforced
110
+ outcome: The harness bounds untrusted content and prompt-borne instructions with enforced isolation, validation, or tested handling.
111
+ risk: Repository, issue, tool, or retrieved content can redirect an agent beyond the authorized task and authority.
112
+ allow_attestation: true
113
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
114
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository, platform, organization]
115
+ evidence:
116
+ - type: manual
117
+ scope: organization
118
+ prompt: Show the untrusted-input boundaries and recent mechanical tests or enforcement evidence for prompt injection, sandbox escape, or unauthorized tool instructions.
119
+ remediation: Define untrusted-input boundaries and enforce them with sandboxing, validation, allowlists, or adversarial tests appropriate to the harness.
120
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-005
121
+ level: 3
122
+ title: High-impact agent actions are technically gated
123
+ outcome: External authority controls prevent unapproved high-impact actions and record controlled exceptions.
124
+ risk: Repository instructions alone cannot prevent credential misuse or irreversible external actions.
125
+ allow_attestation: true
126
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
127
+ evidence:
128
+ - type: manual
129
+ scope: platform
130
+ prompt: Show authorization gates, scoped credentials, approval enforcement, audit records, and controlled bypasses for high-impact agent actions.
131
+ remediation: Enforce least-privileged credentials, approval gates, auditability, and restricted exception handling.
132
+ - id: ADRB-SEC-004
133
+ level: 4
134
+ title: Agent security outcomes drive improvement
135
+ outcome: Denials, near misses, incidents, exceptions, and adversarial exercises are trended and improve controls.
136
+ risk: Controls appear complete while effectiveness against real failure modes remains unknown.
137
+ allow_attestation: true
138
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
139
+ evidence:
140
+ - type: manual
141
+ scope: outcome
142
+ prompt: Provide agent-security outcome trends or exercise results and a recent control change driven by them.
143
+ remediation: Run adversarial exercises, trend security outcomes, and update boundaries from the results.
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
1
+ dimension: specification
2
+ controls:
3
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-001
4
+ level: 1
5
+ title: Work has a durable objective
6
+ outcome: Engineering work starts from a tracked issue, request, or specification artifact.
7
+ risk: Agents optimize an inferred problem and completion cannot be judged consistently.
8
+ evidence:
9
+ - type: path_any
10
+ scope: repository
11
+ patterns: [docs/requirements/**, docs/spec*.md, docs/specs/**, specs/**, .ai/specs/**]
12
+ remediation: Adopt a tracked work-request or specification template with objective, owner, and outcome.
13
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-002
14
+ level: 2
15
+ title: Acceptance criteria and constraints are documented
16
+ outcome: Work artifacts state testable acceptance criteria plus material constraints or exclusions.
17
+ risk: An implementation can appear plausible without satisfying a shared definition of done.
18
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
19
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
20
+ evidence:
21
+ - type: content_terms
22
+ scope: repository
23
+ files: [docs/requirements/**, docs/spec*.md, docs/specs/**, specs/**, .ai/specs/**]
24
+ terms: [acceptance criteria, requirements, constraints, non-goals, verification]
25
+ min_terms: 2
26
+ max_span_lines: 160
27
+ remediation: Add testable outcomes, constraints, exclusions, and verification expectations to work artifacts.
28
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-003
29
+ level: 3
30
+ title: Specification traceability is mechanically checked
31
+ outcome: Automation checks that applicable changes and verification trace to an approved work artifact.
32
+ risk: Specifications become optional prose disconnected from implementation and tests.
33
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
34
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
35
+ evidence:
36
+ - type: ci_command
37
+ scope: repository
38
+ providers: []
39
+ tools: []
40
+ min_tools: 1
41
+ remediation: Add a deterministic traceability check from change to work artifact and verification record.
42
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-005
43
+ level: 3
44
+ title: Specification traceability is required before merge
45
+ outcome: Repository merge policy requires the applicable traceability check or equivalent review evidence.
46
+ risk: A configured check can be skipped or bypassed when delivery pressure rises.
47
+ allow_attestation: true
48
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
49
+ evidence:
50
+ - type: manual
51
+ scope: platform
52
+ prompt: Show that the traceability check or equivalent review requirement is an enforced merge gate with controlled exceptions.
53
+ remediation: Require the traceability check in merge policy and restrict, record, and review bypasses.
54
+ - id: ADRB-SPC-004
55
+ level: 4
56
+ title: Specification effectiveness drives improvement
57
+ outcome: Rework and escaped ambiguity attributable to specifications are trended and improve the process.
58
+ risk: Specification ceremony grows without reducing misunderstanding or rework.
59
+ allow_attestation: true
60
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
61
+ evidence:
62
+ - type: manual
63
+ scope: outcome
64
+ prompt: Provide specification-related rework or ambiguity trends and a recent process change driven by them.
65
+ remediation: Classify rework causes and evolve specification practices using outcome evidence.
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
1
+ dimension: testing
2
+ controls:
3
+ - id: ADRB-TST-001
4
+ level: 1
5
+ title: Automated tests exist
6
+ outcome: The tracked repository contains executable tests for at least one important behavior.
7
+ risk: Agent changes rely on plausibility or manual inspection alone.
8
+ evidence:
9
+ - type: path_any
10
+ scope: repository
11
+ patterns: ['**/*.test.*', '**/*.spec.*', tests/**, test/**]
12
+ remediation: Add a fast automated test for a critical behavior and document how to run it.
13
+ - id: ADRB-TST-002
14
+ level: 2
15
+ title: Verification layers and canonical commands are documented
16
+ outcome: Contributors can identify applicable test layers and the canonical verification path.
17
+ risk: Agents run a convenient subset and overstate confidence in the result.
18
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
19
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
20
+ evidence:
21
+ - type: content_terms
22
+ scope: repository
23
+ files:
24
+ [
25
+ README.md,
26
+ CONTRIBUTING.md,
27
+ AGENTS.md,
28
+ Agents.md,
29
+ agents.md,
30
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
31
+ .ai/Agents.md,
32
+ .ai/constitution.md,
33
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
34
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
35
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
36
+ .agents/**/*.md,
37
+ docs/testing/**,
38
+ package.json,
39
+ Makefile,
40
+ ]
41
+ terms: [unit test, integration test, end-to-end, e2e, typecheck, lint, test]
42
+ min_terms: 2
43
+ required_any_terms: [verify, verification, test, check, CI]
44
+ max_span_lines: 120
45
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
46
+ remediation: Define the test taxonomy and one canonical command that matches CI.
47
+ - id: ADRB-TST-003
48
+ level: 3
49
+ title: CI executes the required verification layers
50
+ outcome: Repository automation runs appropriate tests and static checks from a clean state.
51
+ risk: Documented verification can be omitted from automation or run in an unrepresentative environment.
52
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
53
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
54
+ evidence:
55
+ - type: ci_command
56
+ scope: repository
57
+ min_tools: 2
58
+ remediation: Configure CI to run the applicable verification layers from a clean environment.
59
+ - id: ADRB-TST-005
60
+ level: 3
61
+ title: Verification is enforced before merge
62
+ outcome: Merge policy requires the applicable CI checks and restricts bypasses.
63
+ risk: Healthy CI configuration remains optional under delivery pressure.
64
+ allow_attestation: true
65
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
66
+ evidence:
67
+ - type: manual
68
+ scope: platform
69
+ prompt: Show required status checks or equivalent merge gates, covered branches, bypass actors, and exception controls.
70
+ remediation: Make appropriate CI checks required merge gates and restrict, record, and review bypasses.
71
+ - id: ADRB-TST-004
72
+ level: 4
73
+ title: Verification effectiveness drives improvement
74
+ outcome: Escaped defects, flakiness, and other signal-quality outcomes are trended and improve testing.
75
+ risk: Test count and coverage rise while meaningful defects still escape.
76
+ allow_attestation: true
77
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
78
+ evidence:
79
+ - type: manual
80
+ scope: outcome
81
+ prompt: Provide verification outcome trends by task class and a recent test-strategy improvement driven by them.
82
+ remediation: Trend escaped defects and signal quality, then invest in the weakest verification layers.
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
1
+ dimension: tooling
2
+ controls:
3
+ - id: ADRB-TOL-001
4
+ level: 1
5
+ title: Supported agent tools are declared
6
+ outcome: The tracked repository identifies supported agent interfaces or tool configuration.
7
+ risk: Agents discover tools opportunistically and use unsupported or unsafe paths.
8
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
9
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
10
+ evidence:
11
+ - type: path_any
12
+ scope: repository
13
+ patterns: [.ai/agentic.config.*, .ai/skills/**, .agents/**, mcp.json, .mcp.json]
14
+ remediation: Commit a non-empty declaration of supported agent surfaces and their intended use.
15
+ - id: ADRB-TOL-002
16
+ level: 2
17
+ title: Tool scope and failure behavior are documented
18
+ outcome: Tool guidance defines authority, validation, success signals, failure handling, and approved fallback.
19
+ risk: Agents bypass failures, widen scope, or mistake partial results for success.
20
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
21
+ agent_evidence_scopes: [repository]
22
+ evidence:
23
+ - type: content_terms
24
+ scope: repository
25
+ files:
26
+ [
27
+ AGENTS.md,
28
+ Agents.md,
29
+ agents.md,
30
+ .ai/AGENTS.md,
31
+ .ai/Agents.md,
32
+ .ai/agentic*.md,
33
+ .ai/instructions/**/*.md,
34
+ .ai/rules/**/*.md,
35
+ .ai/skills/**/*.md,
36
+ .agents/**/*.md,
37
+ docs/agentic/**,
38
+ docs/tools/**,
39
+ ]
40
+ terms: [authority, permission, read-only, validation, failure, fallback, approval]
41
+ min_terms: 3
42
+ required_any_terms: [tool, MCP, connector, skill, command, agent]
43
+ max_span_lines: 120
44
+ max_files_per_pattern: 50
45
+ remediation: Document each high-impact tool's authority, inputs, validation, failure mode, and fallback.
46
+ - id: ADRB-TOL-003
47
+ level: 3
48
+ title: High-impact tool authority is technically bounded and audited
49
+ outcome: High-impact tools enforce least privilege, authorization, structured validation, and audit records.
50
+ risk: Prompt instructions become the only barrier between an agent and an irreversible action.
51
+ allow_attestation: true
52
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
53
+ evidence:
54
+ - type: manual
55
+ scope: platform
56
+ prompt: Show technical least-privilege enforcement, authorization tests, validation, audit records, and fail-closed behavior for high-impact tools.
57
+ remediation: Enforce scoped credentials, authorization, schema validation, audit logging, and deny-by-default behavior.
58
+ - id: ADRB-TOL-004
59
+ level: 4
60
+ title: Tool reliability drives improvement
61
+ outcome: Tool success, partial failure, denial, latency, and unsafe-fallback attempts are trended and improved.
62
+ risk: Tooling quality and risky workarounds remain anecdotal until an incident occurs.
63
+ allow_attestation: true
64
+ allow_agent_evidence: true
65
+ evidence:
66
+ - type: manual
67
+ scope: outcome
68
+ prompt: Provide tool reliability trends and a recent tool or fallback improvement driven by them.
69
+ remediation: Trend tool outcomes by task and risk class and improve weak or bypassed interfaces.
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
1
+ {
2
+ "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3
+ "$id": "https://agentic-readiness.dev/schema/v0.4/report.json",
4
+ "title": "ADRB v0.4 assessment report",
5
+ "type": "object",
6
+ "required": [
7
+ "schema_version",
8
+ "benchmark",
9
+ "target",
10
+ "assessed_at",
11
+ "warnings",
12
+ "score",
13
+ "evidence_summary",
14
+ "dimensions",
15
+ "controls",
16
+ "profiles",
17
+ "readiness",
18
+ "limitations"
19
+ ],
20
+ "properties": {
21
+ "schema_version": { "const": "0.4.0" },
22
+ "benchmark": {
23
+ "type": "object",
24
+ "required": ["id", "version"],
25
+ "properties": { "version": { "const": "0.4.0" } }
26
+ },
27
+ "target": {
28
+ "type": "object",
29
+ "required": [
30
+ "repository",
31
+ "profile",
32
+ "scope",
33
+ "git_head",
34
+ "git_remote",
35
+ "working_tree_dirty"
36
+ ],
37
+ "properties": { "scope": { "enum": ["tracked", "workspace"] } }
38
+ },
39
+ "assessed_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
40
+ "warnings": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
41
+ "score": {
42
+ "type": "object",
43
+ "additionalProperties": false,
44
+ "required": ["total", "maximum", "percentage", "repository"],
45
+ "properties": {
46
+ "total": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 40 },
47
+ "maximum": { "const": 40 },
48
+ "percentage": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 100 },
49
+ "repository": {
50
+ "type": "object",
51
+ "additionalProperties": false,
52
+ "required": ["achieved", "ceiling", "percentage"],
53
+ "properties": {
54
+ "achieved": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 40 },
55
+ "ceiling": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 40 },
56
+ "percentage": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 100 }
57
+ }
58
+ }
59
+ }
60
+ },
61
+ "evidence_summary": {
62
+ "type": "object",
63
+ "additionalProperties": false,
64
+ "required": [
65
+ "repository_detected",
66
+ "agent_collected",
67
+ "attested",
68
+ "unmet",
69
+ "unknown",
70
+ "resolved",
71
+ "total"
72
+ ],
73
+ "properties": {
74
+ "repository_detected": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
75
+ "agent_collected": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
76
+ "attested": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
77
+ "unmet": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
78
+ "unknown": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
79
+ "resolved": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
80
+ "total": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 }
81
+ }
82
+ },
83
+ "dimensions": { "type": "array", "minItems": 10, "maxItems": 10 },
84
+ "controls": { "type": "array" },
85
+ "profiles": { "type": "array" },
86
+ "readiness": { "type": "object" },
87
+ "limitations": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } }
88
+ }
89
+ }