agentic-qe 2.0.0 → 2.1.1

package/.claude/skills/performance-testing/SKILL.md

@@ -1,297 +1,149 @@
 ---
 name: performance-testing
-description: Test application performance, scalability, and resilience. Use when planning load testing, stress testing, or optimizing system performance.
+description: "Test application performance, scalability, and resilience. Use when planning load testing, stress testing, or optimizing system performance."
+category: specialized-testing
+priority: high
+tokenEstimate: 1100
+agents: [qe-performance-tester, qe-quality-analyzer, qe-production-intelligence]
+implementation_status: optimized
+optimization_version: 1.0
+last_optimized: 2025-12-02
+dependencies: []
+quick_reference_card: true
+tags: [performance, load-testing, stress-testing, scalability, k6, bottlenecks]
 ---
 
 # Performance Testing
 
-## Core Principle
+<default_to_action>
+When testing performance or planning load tests:
+1. DEFINE SLOs: p95 response time, throughput, error rate targets
+2. IDENTIFY critical paths: revenue flows, high-traffic pages, key APIs
+3. CREATE realistic scenarios: user journeys, think time, varied data
+4. EXECUTE with monitoring: CPU, memory, DB queries, network
+5. ANALYZE bottlenecks and fix before production
+
+**Quick Test Type Selection:**
+- Expected load validation → Load testing
+- Find breaking point → Stress testing
+- Sudden traffic spike → Spike testing
+- Memory leaks, resource exhaustion → Endurance/soak testing
+- Horizontal/vertical scaling → Scalability testing
+
+**Critical Success Factors:**
+- Performance is a feature, not an afterthought
+- Test early and often, not just before release
+- Focus on user-impacting bottlenecks
+</default_to_action>
+
+## Quick Reference Card
+
+### When to Use
+- Before major releases
+- After infrastructure changes
+- Before scaling events (Black Friday)
+- When setting SLAs/SLOs
+
+### Test Types
+| Type | Purpose | When |
+|------|---------|------|
+| **Load** | Expected traffic | Every release |
+| **Stress** | Beyond capacity | Quarterly |
+| **Spike** | Sudden surge | Before events |
+| **Endurance** | Memory leaks | After code changes |
+| **Scalability** | Scaling validation | Infrastructure changes |
 
-**Performance is a feature, not an afterthought.**
-
-Test performance like you test functionality: continuously, automatically, and with clear acceptance criteria.
-
-## Why Performance Testing Matters
-
-### User Impact
-- 100ms delay = 1% drop in conversions (Amazon)
-- 53% of mobile users abandon sites taking > 3 seconds (Google)
-- Slow = Broken (in users' eyes)
-
-### Business Impact
-- Lost revenue from abandoned transactions
-- Increased infrastructure costs
-- Degraded user experience
-- Reputation damage
-
-### Technical Impact
-- Scalability limits
-- Infrastructure bottlenecks
-- Hidden architectural problems
-
-## Types of Performance Testing
-
-### 1. Load Testing
-
-**What**: System behavior under expected load
-
-**Goal**: Verify the system handles typical usage
-
-**Example**: 
-- E-commerce site handling 1,000 concurrent users
-- API serving 10,000 requests/minute
-- Database processing 500 transactions/second
-
-**When**: Before every major release
-
-**Tools**: k6, JMeter, Gatling, Artillery
-
-### 2. Stress Testing
-
-**What**: System behavior under extreme load (beyond capacity)
-
-**Goal**: Find breaking point, see how system fails
-
-**Example**:
-- Ramping up from 1,000 to 10,000 concurrent users
-- Pushing API until response time degrades
-- Filling database until queries slow
-
-**When**: Before scaling infrastructure, quarterly at minimum
-
-**What to look for**: Graceful degradation, not catastrophic failure
-
-### 3. Spike Testing
-
-**What**: System behavior under sudden load increase
-
-**Goal**: Test auto-scaling, handling unexpected traffic
-
-**Example**:
-- Black Friday sale announcement
-- Viral social media post
-- Marketing campaign launch
-
-**When**: Before major events, after infrastructure changes
-
-**Pattern**: Instant ramp from normal to 5-10x load
-
-### 4. Endurance/Soak Testing
-
-**What**: System behavior over extended time
-
-**Goal**: Find memory leaks, resource exhaustion, gradual degradation
-
-**Example**:
-- Run at normal load for 24-72 hours
-- Monitor memory, connections, file handles
-- Check for resource leaks
-
-**When**: After significant code changes, quarterly
-
-**What to look for**: Stable resource usage over time
-
-### 5. Scalability Testing
-
-**What**: How system performs as load increases
-
-**Goal**: Validate horizontal/vertical scaling
-
-**Example**:
-- Add servers, measure throughput improvement
-- Test auto-scaling triggers
-- Find scaling limits
-
-**When**: Before capacity planning, infrastructure changes
-
-## Performance Testing Strategy
-
-### Start with Requirements
-
-**Bad**: "The system should be fast"
-**Good**: "95th percentile response time < 200ms under 1,000 concurrent users"
-
-**Define SLOs (Service Level Objectives)**:
-- **Response Time**: 95th percentile < 200ms
-- **Throughput**: 10,000 requests/minute minimum
-- **Error Rate**: < 0.1% under load
-- **Resource Usage**: CPU < 70%, Memory < 80%
-
-### Identify Critical Paths
-
-Don't test everything equally. Focus on:
-- Revenue-generating flows (checkout, payment)
-- High-traffic pages (homepage, product pages)
-- Critical APIs (authentication, data access)
-- Resource-intensive operations (search, reports)
-
-### Realistic Scenarios
-
-**Bad**: Every user hits homepage repeatedly
-**Good**: 
-- 40% browse products
-- 30% search
-- 20% view product details
-- 10% checkout
-
-Include:
-- Think time (users don't click instantly)
-- Varied data (different products, users, queries)
-- Realistic workflows (browse → search → add to cart → checkout)
-
-## Setting Up Performance Tests
-
-### Test Environment
-
-**Ideal**: Production-like infrastructure
-- Same server specs
-- Same database size
-- Same network topology
-- Same third-party integrations (or mocks)
+### Key Metrics
+| Metric | Target | Why |
+|--------|--------|-----|
+| p95 response | < 200ms | User experience |
+| Throughput | 10k req/min | Capacity |
+| Error rate | < 0.1% | Reliability |
+| CPU | < 70% | Headroom |
+| Memory | < 80% | Stability |
+
+### Tools
+- **k6**: Modern, JS-based, CI/CD friendly
+- **JMeter**: Enterprise, feature-rich
+- **Artillery**: Simple YAML configs
+- **Gatling**: Scala, great reporting
+
+### Agent Coordination
+- `qe-performance-tester`: Load test orchestration
+- `qe-quality-analyzer`: Results analysis
+- `qe-production-intelligence`: Production comparison
 
-**Reality**: Often scaled-down version
-- Document differences
-- Extrapolate results carefully
-- Validate with production monitoring
+---
 
-### Test Data
+## Defining SLOs
 
-**Requirements**:
-- Realistic volume (don't test with 100 users when you have 10M)
-- Varied data (avoid cache hits skewing results)
-- Production-like distribution (80/20 rule applies)
+**Bad:** "The system should be fast"
+**Good:** "p95 response time < 200ms under 1,000 concurrent users"
 
-**Example**:
-```
-Products: 100,000 (matching production)
-Users: 50,000 test accounts
-Orders: 1M historical orders
-Search queries: Real query distribution
+```javascript
+export const options = {
+  thresholds: {
+    http_req_duration: ['p(95)<200'],  // 95% < 200ms
+    http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01'],     // < 1% failures
+  },
+};
 ```
 
-### Monitoring During Tests
+---
 
-**Essential metrics**:
-- Response time (avg, 50th, 95th, 99th percentile)
-- Throughput (requests/second)
-- Error rate
-- CPU, memory, disk I/O
-- Database query time
-- Network latency
+## Realistic Scenarios
 
-**Tools**:
-- Application: New Relic, Datadog, Dynatrace
-- Infrastructure: Prometheus, Grafana
-- Database: Query analyzers, slow query logs
+**Bad:** Every user hits homepage repeatedly
+**Good:** Model actual user behavior
 
-## Common Performance Bottlenecks
+```javascript
+// Realistic distribution
+// 40% browse, 30% search, 20% details, 10% checkout
+export default function () {
+  const action = Math.random();
+  if (action < 0.4) browse();
+  else if (action < 0.7) search();
+  else if (action < 0.9) viewProduct();
+  else checkout();
 
-### 1. Database
+  sleep(randomInt(1, 5)); // Think time
+}
+```
 
-**Symptoms**:
-- Slow queries under load
-- Connection pool exhaustion
-- Lock contention
+---
 
-**Solutions**:
-- Add indexes on filtered columns
-- Optimize N+1 queries
-- Increase connection pool size
-- Add read replicas
-- Implement caching
+## Common Bottlenecks
 
-### 2. N+1 Queries
+### Database
+**Symptoms:** Slow queries under load, connection pool exhaustion
+**Fixes:** Add indexes, optimize N+1 queries, increase pool size, read replicas
 
-**Problem**:
+### N+1 Queries
 ```javascript
-// Load 100 orders
+// BAD: 100 orders = 101 queries
 const orders = await Order.findAll();
-
-// For each order, load customer (100 queries!)
 for (const order of orders) {
   const customer = await Customer.findById(order.customerId);
 }
-```
 
-**Fix**:
-```javascript
-// Load orders with customers in one query
-const orders = await Order.findAll({
-  include: [Customer]
-});
+// GOOD: 1 query
+const orders = await Order.findAll({ include: [Customer] });
 ```
 
-### 3. Synchronous Processing
-
-**Problem**: Blocking operations in request path
-
-**Example**: Sending email during checkout
-
-**Fix**: 
-- Use message queues (RabbitMQ, SQS)
-- Process asynchronously
-- Return response immediately
-
-### 4. Memory Leaks
+### Synchronous Processing
+**Problem:** Blocking operations in request path (sending email during checkout)
+**Fix:** Use message queues, process async, return immediately
 
-**Symptoms**:
-- Memory usage grows over time
-- Performance degrades gradually
-- Eventually crashes
+### Memory Leaks
+**Detection:** Endurance testing, memory profiling
+**Common causes:** Event listeners not cleaned, caches without eviction
 
-**Detection**:
-- Endurance testing
-- Memory profiling (heap dumps)
-- Monitor garbage collection
+### External Dependencies
+**Solutions:** Aggressive timeouts, circuit breakers, caching, graceful degradation
 
-**Common causes**:
-- Event listeners not cleaned up
-- Caches without eviction
-- Circular references
-- Global state accumulation
-
-### 5. Inadequate Caching
-
-**Problem**: Recalculating same results repeatedly
-
-**Strategy**:
-- Cache expensive operations
-- Use CDN for static assets
-- Implement application-level caching (Redis)
-- Browser caching (Cache-Control headers)
-
-**Balance**: Cache hit rate vs. memory usage
-
-### 6. External Dependencies
-
-**Problem**: Third-party APIs slow or unavailable
-
-**Solutions**:
-- Set aggressive timeouts
-- Implement circuit breakers
-- Cache responses when possible
-- Degrade gracefully if unavailable
-
-## Performance Testing in CI/CD
-
-### Continuous Performance Testing
-
-**Approach 1: Smoke Tests**
-- Run small load test on every commit
-- 10 concurrent users for 1 minute
-- Catch major regressions quickly
-
-**Approach 2: Nightly Tests**
-- Full load test overnight
-- More comprehensive scenarios
-- Trend analysis over time
-
-**Approach 3: Pre-Production Gate**
-- Load test before production deploy
-- Automated pass/fail criteria
-- Block deployment if performance degrades
+---
 
-### Example: k6 in CI/CD
+## k6 CI/CD Example
 
 ```javascript
 // performance-test.js
@@ -301,275 +153,76 @@ import { check, sleep } from 'k6';
 export const options = {
   stages: [
     { duration: '1m', target: 50 },   // Ramp up
-    { duration: '3m', target: 50 },   // Stay at 50 users
+    { duration: '3m', target: 50 },   // Steady
     { duration: '1m', target: 0 },    // Ramp down
   ],
   thresholds: {
-    http_req_duration: ['p(95)<200'],  // 95% of requests < 200ms
-    http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01'],    // < 1% failures
+    http_req_duration: ['p(95)<200'],
+    http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01'],
   },
 };
 
 export default function () {
   const res = http.get('https://api.example.com/products');
-  
   check(res, {
     'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,
     'response time < 200ms': (r) => r.timings.duration < 200,
   });
-  
   sleep(1);
 }
 ```
 
 ```yaml
-# .github/workflows/performance.yml
-name: Performance Tests
-
-on:
-  pull_request:
-    branches: [main]
-
-jobs:
-  performance:
-    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
-      
-      - name: Run k6 test
-        uses: grafana/k6-action@v0.3.0
-        with:
-          filename: performance-test.js
-          
-      - name: Upload results
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v2
-        with:
-          name: k6-results
-          path: results.json
+# GitHub Actions
+- name: Run k6 test
+  uses: grafana/k6-action@v0.3.0
+  with:
+    filename: performance-test.js
 ```
 
-## Analyzing Performance Test Results
-
-### Key Metrics
-
-**Response Time Distribution**:
-- **Average**: Misleading (outliers skew it)
-- **Median (50th percentile)**: Typical user experience
-- **95th percentile**: "Slow but acceptable"
-- **99th percentile**: Worst user experience
-
-**Throughput**:
-- Requests/second sustained
-- How it changes with load
-- Where it plateaus (capacity)
-
-**Error Rate**:
-- Should stay flat as load increases
-- Spike indicates breaking point
+---
 
-### Interpreting Results
+## Analyzing Results
 
-**Good**:
+### Good Results
 ```
-Load: 1,000 users
-Response time p95: 180ms
-Throughput: 5,000 req/s
-Error rate: 0.05%
-CPU: 65%, Memory: 70%
+Load: 1,000 users | p95: 180ms | Throughput: 5,000 req/s
+Error rate: 0.05% | CPU: 65% | Memory: 70%
 ```
 
-**Problems**:
+### Problems
 ```
-Load: 1,000 users
-Response time p95: 3,500ms ❌ (too slow)
-Throughput: 500 req/s ❌ (way below target)
-Error rate: 5% ❌ (too many errors)
-CPU: 95%, Memory: 90% ❌ (maxed out)
+Load: 1,000 users | p95: 3,500ms ❌ | Throughput: 500 req/s ❌
+Error rate: 5% ❌ | CPU: 95% ❌ | Memory: 90% ❌
 ```
 
 ### Root Cause Analysis
+1. Correlate metrics: When response time spikes, what changes?
+2. Check logs: Errors, warnings, slow queries
+3. Profile code: Where is time spent?
+4. Monitor resources: CPU, memory, disk
+5. Trace requests: End-to-end flow
 
-1. **Correlate metrics**: When response time spikes, what else changes?
-2. **Check logs**: Errors, warnings, slow queries
-3. **Profile code**: Where is time spent?
-4. **Monitor resources**: CPU, memory, network, disk
-5. **Trace requests**: End-to-end request flow
-
-## Production Performance Monitoring
-
-### Synthetic Monitoring
-
-**What**: Automated tests hitting production
-
-**Example**:
-- Every 5 minutes, test critical flows
-- Measure response time from multiple locations
-- Alert if degradation detected
-
-**Tools**: Pingdom, Datadog Synthetics, New Relic Synthetics
-
-### Real User Monitoring (RUM)
-
-**What**: Measure actual user experience
-
-**Metrics**:
-- Page load time
-- Time to interactive
-- API response times
-- Error rates
-
-**Tools**: Google Analytics, New Relic Browser, Datadog RUM
-
-### Alerting
-
-**Set alerts on**:
-- p95 response time > threshold
-- Error rate > 1%
-- Throughput drops suddenly
-- Queue depth growing
-
-**Don't alert on**:
-- Average response time (too noisy)
-- Single slow request (outliers happen)
-
-## Performance Testing Anti-Patterns
-
-### ❌ Testing Too Late
-
-**Problem**: Find performance issues in production
-
-**Fix**: Test early and often, catch issues before release
-
-### ❌ Unrealistic Scenarios
-
-**Problem**: Test doesn't match real usage
-
-**Example**: All users hitting same endpoint simultaneously
-
-**Fix**: Model realistic user journeys, think time, data distribution
-
-### ❌ Ignoring Ramp-Up
-
-**Problem**: 0 to 1,000 users instantly
-
-**Real world**: Traffic grows gradually (usually)
-
-**Fix**: Ramp up over time, see how system adapts
-
-### ❌ Testing Without Monitoring
-
-**Problem**: Can't see what's happening during test
-
-**Fix**: Monitor everything during tests
-
-### ❌ No Baseline
-
-**Problem**: Don't know if results are good or bad
-
-**Fix**: Establish baseline, track trends over time
-
-### ❌ One-Time Testing
-
-**Problem**: Test once before launch, never again
-
-**Fix**: Continuous performance testing, trend monitoring
-
-## Tools Overview
-
-### Load Testing Tools
-
-**k6**: Modern, developer-friendly, JavaScript-based
-- Good for: CI/CD integration, API testing
-- Learning curve: Low
-
-**JMeter**: Mature, feature-rich, GUI-based
-- Good for: Complex scenarios, extensive protocols
-- Learning curve: Medium
-
-**Gatling**: Scala-based, great reporting
-- Good for: High load, detailed metrics
-- Learning curve: Medium
-
-**Artillery**: Node.js, simple YAML configs
-- Good for: Quick tests, simple scenarios
-- Learning curve: Very low
-
-**Locust**: Python-based, distributed testing
-- Good for: Custom user behavior, Python ecosystems
-- Learning curve: Low-Medium
-
-### APM (Application Performance Monitoring)
-
-- **New Relic**: Comprehensive, expensive
-- **Datadog**: Infrastructure + APM combined
-- **Dynatrace**: AI-powered root cause analysis
-- **AppDynamics**: Enterprise-focused
-
-### Database Profiling
-
-- **pg_stat_statements** (PostgreSQL)
-- **MySQL slow query log**
-- **MongoDB profiler**
-- **Redis SLOWLOG**
-
-## Real-World Example
-
-### Scenario: E-Commerce Checkout Slow
-
-**Problem**: Checkout taking 5+ seconds under load
-
-**Investigation**:
-1. Load test: Reproduce issue
-2. Monitor: Database CPU at 95%
-3. Profile: Slow query on order creation
-4. Root cause: Missing index on `orders.user_id`
-
-**Fix**:
-```sql
-CREATE INDEX idx_orders_user_id ON orders(user_id);
-```
-
-**Result**:
-- Checkout time: 5s → 300ms
-- Database CPU: 95% → 40%
-- Throughput: 5x improvement
-
-## When NOT to Performance Test
-
-- **MVPs/Prototypes**: Focus on validating idea first
-- **Internal tools**: With < 10 users, performance rarely matters
-- **One-time scripts**: Not worth the effort
-- **Before optimization**: Profile first, optimize second, then test
-
-## Checklist: Before Going to Production
-
-- [ ] Load test passed (expected traffic)
-- [ ] Stress test passed (2-3x expected traffic)
-- [ ] Spike test passed (sudden traffic surge)
-- [ ] Endurance test passed (24+ hours)
-- [ ] Database indexes in place
-- [ ] Caching configured
-- [ ] Monitoring and alerting set up
-- [ ] Auto-scaling configured (if applicable)
-- [ ] Performance baseline established
+---
 
-## Remember
+## Anti-Patterns
 
-**Performance is a feature**: Test it like functionality
-**Test continuously**: Not just before launch
-**Monitor production**: Synthetic + real user monitoring
-**Set realistic goals**: Based on business requirements
-**Fix what matters**: Focus on user-impacting bottlenecks
-**Trend over time**: Performance degrades gradually, catch it early
+| ❌ Anti-Pattern | ✅ Better |
+|----------------|-----------|
+| Testing too late | Test early and often |
+| Unrealistic scenarios | Model real user behavior |
+| 0 to 1000 users instantly | Ramp up gradually |
+| No monitoring during tests | Monitor everything |
+| No baseline | Establish and track trends |
+| One-time testing | Continuous performance testing |
 
-## Using with QE Agents
+---
 
-### Automated Performance Testing
+## Agent-Assisted Performance Testing
 
-**qe-performance-tester** orchestrates load testing:
 ```typescript
-// Agent runs comprehensive load test
-const perfTest = await agent.runLoadTest({
+// Comprehensive load test
+await Task("Load Test", {
   target: 'https://api.example.com',
   scenarios: {
     checkout: { vus: 100, duration: '5m' },
@@ -578,57 +231,47 @@ const perfTest = await agent.runLoadTest({
   },
   thresholds: {
     'http_req_duration': ['p(95)<200'],
-    'http_req_failed': ['rate<0.01'],
-    'http_reqs': ['rate>100']
+    'http_req_failed': ['rate<0.01']
   }
-});
-
-// Returns detailed performance report
-```
+}, "qe-performance-tester");
 
-### Bottleneck Analysis
-
-```typescript
-// Agent identifies performance bottlenecks
-const analysis = await qe-performance-tester.analyzeBottlenecks({
+// Bottleneck analysis
+await Task("Analyze Bottlenecks", {
   testResults: perfTest,
-  metrics: ['cpu', 'memory', 'db_queries', 'network', 'cache_hits']
-});
-
-// Returns:
-// {
-//   bottlenecks: [
-//     { component: 'database', severity: 'high', suggestion: 'Add index on orders.created_at' },
-//     { component: 'api', severity: 'medium', suggestion: 'Enable response caching' }
-//   ]
-// }
-```
+  metrics: ['cpu', 'memory', 'db_queries', 'network']
+}, "qe-performance-tester");
 
-### Continuous Performance Monitoring
-
-```typescript
-// Agent integrates performance testing in CI/CD
-const ciPerformance = await qe-performance-tester.ciIntegration({
-  mode: 'smoke',  // Quick test on every commit
+// CI integration
+await Task("CI Performance Gate", {
+  mode: 'smoke',
   duration: '1m',
   vus: 10,
-  failOn: {
-    'p95_response_time': 300,  // ms
-    'error_rate': 0.01         // 1%
-  }
-});
+  failOn: { 'p95_response_time': 300, 'error_rate': 0.01 }
+}, "qe-performance-tester");
 ```
 
-### Fleet Coordination for Performance
+---
+
+## Agent Coordination Hints
 
+### Memory Namespace
+```
+aqe/performance/
+├── results/*       - Test execution results
+├── baselines/*     - Performance baselines
+├── bottlenecks/*   - Identified bottlenecks
+└── trends/*        - Historical trends
+```
+
+### Fleet Coordination
 ```typescript
-const performanceFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
+const perfFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
   strategy: 'performance-testing',
   agents: [
-    'qe-performance-tester',       // Run load tests
-    'qe-quality-analyzer',         // Analyze results
-    'qe-production-intelligence',  // Compare to production
-    'qe-deployment-readiness'      // Go/no-go decision
+    'qe-performance-tester',
+    'qe-quality-analyzer',
+    'qe-production-intelligence',
+    'qe-deployment-readiness'
   ],
   topology: 'sequential'
 });
@@ -636,21 +279,32 @@ const performanceFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
 
 ---
 
-## Related Skills
+## Pre-Production Checklist
+
+- [ ] Load test passed (expected traffic)
+- [ ] Stress test passed (2-3x expected)
+- [ ] Spike test passed (sudden surge)
+- [ ] Endurance test passed (24+ hours)
+- [ ] Database indexes in place
+- [ ] Caching configured
+- [ ] Monitoring and alerting set up
+- [ ] Performance baseline established
 
-**Testing:**
+---
+
+## Related Skills
 - [agentic-quality-engineering](../agentic-quality-engineering/) - Agent coordination
-- [api-testing-patterns](../api-testing-patterns/) - API performance testing
+- [api-testing-patterns](../api-testing-patterns/) - API performance
+- [chaos-engineering-resilience](../chaos-engineering-resilience/) - Resilience testing
 
-**Quality:**
-- [quality-metrics](../quality-metrics/) - Performance metrics tracking
-- [risk-based-testing](../risk-based-testing/) - Performance risk assessment
+---
 
-## Resources
+## Remember
 
-- **k6 Documentation**: k6.io/docs
-- **Google Web Fundamentals**: Performance optimization guides
-- **"Release It!"** by Michael Nygard: Production-ready patterns
-- **High Performance Browser Networking** by Ilya Grigorik
+**Performance is a feature:** Test it like functionality
+**Test continuously:** Not just before launch
+**Monitor production:** Synthetic + real user monitoring
+**Fix what matters:** Focus on user-impacting bottlenecks
+**Trend over time:** Catch degradation early
 
-Performance testing isn't optional—it's how you ensure your system works when it matters most.
+**With Agents:** Agents automate load testing, analyze bottlenecks, and compare with production. Use agents to maintain performance at scale.