agentic-code 0.6.4 → 0.6.6
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
|
@@ -100,6 +100,51 @@ Count affected components:
|
|
|
100
100
|
- Integration complexity
|
|
101
101
|
- Testing requirements
|
|
102
102
|
|
|
103
|
+
#### File Count Estimation Process [MANDATORY]
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
Before determining scale, investigate existing code with concrete steps:
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
1. **Identify entry points**: Find files directly related to the task (e.g., components, API endpoints, handlers)
|
|
108
|
+
2. **Trace dependencies**: Follow imports and callers to discover connected files
|
|
109
|
+
3. **Include test files**: Add related test files to the count
|
|
110
|
+
4. **List explicitly**: Document affected file paths as evidence for scale determination
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
**Scale determination must cite specific file paths as evidence.**
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
Example output:
|
|
115
|
+
```
|
|
116
|
+
Affected Files (5 files → Medium scale):
|
|
117
|
+
- src/components/UserProfile.tsx (modify)
|
|
118
|
+
- src/hooks/useUser.ts (modify)
|
|
119
|
+
- src/api/userApi.ts (modify)
|
|
120
|
+
- src/components/__tests__/UserProfile.test.tsx (modify)
|
|
121
|
+
- src/hooks/__tests__/useUser.test.ts (modify)
|
|
122
|
+
```
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
#### Scale Confidence
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
Indicate certainty level of scale determination:
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
- **confirmed**: Scale is certain based on clear requirements and identified files
|
|
129
|
+
- **provisional**: Scale may change depending on user answers to clarifying questions
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
When provisional, always document **Scope Dependencies** - questions whose answers affect scale.
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
#### Scope Dependencies
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
When scale confidence is provisional, explicitly document factors that could change the scale:
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
```
|
|
138
|
+
Scope Dependencies:
|
|
139
|
+
- Authentication method: Use existing OAuth → Medium (3 files) / New implementation → Large (8 files)
|
|
140
|
+
- Caching requirement: None → Medium / Required → Large (adds Redis integration)
|
|
141
|
+
```
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
This enables:
|
|
144
|
+
1. User to understand what decisions affect scope
|
|
145
|
+
2. Re-evaluation when requirements are clarified
|
|
146
|
+
3. Transparent reasoning for scale determination
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
103
148
|
### Step 4: Execute Rule Selection [BLOCKING CHECKPOINT]
|
|
104
149
|
|
|
105
150
|
**EXECUTION GATES - System HALTS if any step skipped:**
|
|
@@ -245,8 +290,16 @@ Based on scale and complexity:
|
|
|
245
290
|
[RULE SELECTION CHECKPOINT]
|
|
246
291
|
Task Type: [type]
|
|
247
292
|
Task Scale: [scale]
|
|
293
|
+
Scale Confidence: [confirmed/provisional]
|
|
248
294
|
SESSION_BASELINE_DATE: [stored date from initial setup]
|
|
249
295
|
|
|
296
|
+
Affected Files:
|
|
297
|
+
- [path/to/file1] (create/modify)
|
|
298
|
+
- [path/to/file2] (create/modify)
|
|
299
|
+
|
|
300
|
+
Scope Dependencies (if provisional):
|
|
301
|
+
- [Question that affects scale]: If [condition A] → [scale], If [condition B] → [scale]
|
|
302
|
+
|
|
250
303
|
Path Recommendation:
|
|
251
304
|
- [Direct execution of task definitions] OR
|
|
252
305
|
- [Workflow recommended: agentic-coding.md]
|
|
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ Create ADR and Design Documents.
|
|
|
101
101
|
□ Testing strategy outlined
|
|
102
102
|
□ Acceptance criteria defined and verifiable
|
|
103
103
|
□ References cited
|
|
104
|
+
□ Complexity assessment completed (if medium/high, rationale justifies necessity)
|
|
104
105
|
|
|
105
106
|
## Mandatory Process Before Document Creation [STRICT COMPLIANCE]
|
|
106
107
|
|
|
@@ -263,6 +264,8 @@ Option [X] selected. Rationale: [2-3 sentences with trade-offs]
|
|
|
263
264
|
```yaml
|
|
264
265
|
design_type: "new_feature|extension|refactoring"
|
|
265
266
|
risk_level: "low|medium|high"
|
|
267
|
+
complexity_level: "low|medium|high"
|
|
268
|
+
complexity_rationale: "[Required if medium/high: which requirements necessitate this complexity]"
|
|
266
269
|
main_constraints:
|
|
267
270
|
- "[constraint 1]"
|
|
268
271
|
- "[constraint 2]"
|
|
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ When sources exist:
|
|
|
168
168
|
- Content quality issues exist
|
|
169
169
|
- Failure scenarios partially covered
|
|
170
170
|
- Medium severity issues present
|
|
171
|
+
- Complexity level is medium/high but rationale does not justify necessity (Design Docs)
|
|
171
172
|
|
|
172
173
|
**blocked**:
|
|
173
174
|
- Critical sections missing
|
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Your AI (LLM), guided by built-in workflows. Describe what you want, and it foll
|
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
5
|
[](LICENSE)
|
|
6
6
|
[](https://agents.md)
|
|
7
|
-
[](package.json)
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
10
|
|