agenthud 0.9.1 → 0.9.3

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1,12 +1,37 @@
1
- The following is an activity log of work done with Claude Code. Summarize it concisely in English using the format below.
1
+ The following is an activity log from a single day of Claude Code sessions.
2
+ Each entry: `[HH:MM] <icon> <label>: <detail>`. Icons indicate activity type (◆ = git commit).
2
3
 
3
- ## Completed Work
4
- - (What was accomplished focus on Response entries)
4
+ Write a concise but high-signal engineering summary in English.
5
+ Aim for roughly 300-500 words totalfavor synthesis over completeness.
5
6
 
6
- ## Notable Changes
7
- - (Which files were modified and how — from Edit/Write entries)
7
+ Focus on:
8
+ - meaningful accomplishments
9
+ - debugging discoveries
10
+ - architectural decisions
11
+ - implementation progress
12
+ - important tradeoffs or realizations
13
+ - unfinished work and next steps
8
14
 
9
- ## Commits
10
- - (Summary of the commit lines)
15
+ Do NOT mechanically summarize every edit, response, or commit.
16
+ Do NOT list every modified file.
17
+ Omit any section that has no substantive content — do not emit placeholders like "None" or "N/A".
18
+ Prefer high-level synthesis grouped by theme or workstream.
19
+
20
+ Use the following format:
21
+
22
+ ## Context
23
+ What was the primary goal or investigation today?
24
+
25
+ ## Key Accomplishments
26
+ Meaningful progress, completed implementations, resolved issues.
27
+
28
+ ## Technical Insights
29
+ Important debugging findings, architectural decisions, tradeoffs, or discoveries.
30
+
31
+ ## Major Code Changes
32
+ Significant codebase or subsystem changes, grouped by theme. Reference relevant commits inline where useful (e.g. `abc1234`). Do not enumerate every commit.
33
+
34
+ ## Open Questions / Next Steps
35
+ Only include items explicitly stated in the log or strongly implied by an unfinished workflow. Do not invent generic follow-ups ("consider refactoring X").
11
36
 
12
37
  Activity log:
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
1
+ The following are daily engineering summaries from a date range, separated by `---` lines.
2
+ Each daily summary uses the structure: Context / Key Accomplishments / Technical Insights / Major Code Changes / Open Questions.
3
+
4
+ Write a range-level synthesis in English.
5
+ Aim for roughly 400-700 words total — the value of a range summary is cross-day pattern extraction, not re-summarization.
6
+
7
+ Do NOT concatenate or restate the daily summaries.
8
+ Do NOT produce a per-day timeline ("On Monday X, on Tuesday Y...").
9
+ Do NOT report a day's cache/auth/load status (e.g. "cached", "not logged in", "no activity") as if it were the day's content. Such phrases reflect tooling state, not engineering work — exclude them entirely. If a day has no substantive content, just don't mention it.
10
+ Omit any section that has no substantive content.
11
+
12
+ The point of a range summary is to surface what only becomes visible by looking across days:
13
+ - threads of work that spanned multiple days
14
+ - recurring debugging patterns or repeated tradeoffs
15
+ - outcomes that matter at the range level, not at any single day
16
+ - work that started in one day and continued, completed, or was abandoned later
17
+
18
+ Use the following format:
19
+
20
+ ## Range Overview
21
+ What date range this covers and the dominant theme of the period. 1-3 sentences.
22
+
23
+ ## Major Outcomes
24
+ The 3-5 most significant results of the range. Consolidate across days; do not attribute to specific dates unless meaningful.
25
+
26
+ ## Workstreams
27
+ Multi-day initiatives or investigations. For each: what it was, how it evolved across the range, and where it ended (shipped, paused, abandoned, ongoing).
28
+
29
+ ## Recurring Patterns
30
+ Themes that surfaced on more than one day: repeated debugging classes, recurring tradeoffs, friction points, or design tensions.
31
+
32
+ ## Carried-Over / Unfinished Work
33
+ Work still in progress at the end of the range, or open questions that persisted across multiple days.
34
+
35
+ Daily summaries:
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "agenthud",
3
- "version": "0.9.1",
3
+ "version": "0.9.3",
4
4
  "description": "CLI tool to monitor agent status in real-time. Works with Claude Code, multi-agent workflows, and any AI agent system.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "main": "dist/index.js",
@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
1
- # agenthud configuration
2
-
3
- width: 100 # between 50~120
4
-
5
- panels:
6
- claude:
7
- enabled: true
8
- interval: 10s
9
- max_activities: 20
10
- # session_timeout: 60m # session inactive threshold (default: since midnight)
11
-
12
- git:
13
- enabled: true
14
- interval: 30s
15
- command:
16
- branch: git branch --show-current
17
- commits: git log --since=midnight --pretty=format:"%h|%aI|%s"
18
- stats: git log --since=midnight --numstat --pretty=format:""
19
-
20
- tests:
21
- enabled: true
22
- interval: manual
23
- # command is auto-detected from: vitest, jest, mocha, pytest
24
- # all frameworks output JUnit XML to .agenthud/test-results.xml
25
- command: npx vitest run --reporter=junit --outputFile=.agenthud/test-results.xml
26
-
27
- project:
28
- enabled: true
29
- interval: 5m # doesn't change often
30
-
31
- #docker:
32
- # enabled: true
33
- # command: docker ps --format json
34
- # renderer: list
35
- # interval: manual