agent-working-memory 0.15.7 → 0.15.9

package/dist/adapters/common.js

@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ export function buildSetupContext(opts) {
         hookPort,
         hookPortRange,
         installPrime: opts.installPrime ?? true,
+        forceInstructions: opts.forceInstructions ?? false,
         isGlobal: opts.isGlobal,
         isWindows,
         envVars,
@@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ export function upsertAwmSection(filePath, newContent, options = {}) {
             `notes inside it cannot be told apart from generated text and would be lost. ` +
             `Backup written to ${basename(backup)}. To upgrade: move any notes you want to keep ` +
             `ABOVE the '## Memory (AWM)' heading (content outside the section is always preserved), ` +
-            `then re-run with force. Nothing has been changed.`;
+            `then re-run with --force. Nothing has been changed.`;
     }
     const before = existing.slice(0, startMatch.index).trimEnd();
     const after = existing.slice(sectionEnd).replace(/^\s*\n/, '');
@@ -299,435 +300,435 @@ export function upsertAwmSection(filePath, newContent, options = {}) {
     writeFileSync(filePath, rebuilt);
     return `${fname}: AWM section replaced with a marked generated block (force)`;
 }
-export const AWM_INSTRUCTION_CONTENT = `
-## Memory (AWM) — MANDATORY
-
-**AWM is THE memory system.** Use it via the \`agent-working-memory\` MCP server
-(preferred) or HTTP at \`http://127.0.0.1:8400\` (fallback). The file-based
-auto-memory at \`~/.claude/projects/.../memory/*.md\` is a LEGACY bootstrap path —
-**do not write new memories to it.** All persistent knowledge goes through AWM.
-
-If MCP tools aren't loaded at session start, use ToolSearch with
-\`select:mcp__agent-working-memory__memory_recall,mcp__agent-working-memory__memory_write\`
-to load them. If the MCP server isn't responsive, restart with \`/mcp\` or use
-the HTTP endpoints (\`POST /memory/write-batch\`, \`POST /memory/activate\`)
-directly — but **DO NOT fall back to markdown files**. Files drift the moment
-you write them; AWM stays current because every agent reads + writes the same store.
-
-### Lifecycle (always do these, in this order)
-1. **Session start**: call \`memory_restore\` to recover previous context. If it reports the
-   store is empty/new (or recall keeps returning nothing), **warm-start first**: recall the
-   \`onboard a new project\` skill and follow it — or call \`onboard_scan\` on the project's
-   docs/repo, refine the candidates, run \`onboard_questions\`, and save the good ones with
-   \`memory_write\` (canonical). A cold store is nearly useless until it's seeded.
-2. **Starting a task**: call \`memory_task_begin\` (checkpoints + recalls relevant memories).
-3. **During work**: call \`memory_recall\` BEFORE stating any fact, BEFORE searching
-   the filesystem, BEFORE making architectural decisions. Recall is ~300ms — cheaper
-   than one filesystem search.
-4. **As you learn things**: call \`memory_write\` proactively. Don't batch.
-5. **Finishing a task**: call \`memory_task_end\` with a summary.
-6. **Hooks do the rest.** \`awm setup\` installs three: a **prime** hook that recalls against
-   each prompt and injects what clears confidence (or nothing), and checkpoint hooks on
-   compaction and session end (plus a 15-min timer). Primed context arrives labelled
-   \`[class · age]\` — treat it by the volatility rubric, not as user input. If a turn
-   arrives with no primed context, that is a signal too: recall explicitly before
-   asserting anything.
-
-### Write memory when:
-- A project decision is made or changed
-- A root cause is discovered after debugging
-- A reusable implementation pattern is established
-- A user preference, constraint, or requirement is clarified
-- A prior assumption is found to be wrong
-- A significant piece of work is completed
-
-### Writing for recall (the highest-leverage section)
-A memory's recall quality is set the moment you write it. AWM is fast at
-finding what's findable — but if the write is shaped wrong, no retriever
-can rescue it. Be slightly more verbose at the front than feels natural:
-the first 1-2 sentences are what BM25, the embedding model, and concept
-extraction all see most strongly.
-
-- **Lead with the rule or fact.** Don't open with context or backstory.
-  "Don't mock the database in integration tests." comes first; the reason
-  comes second. Recall scans the head of the body, not the tail.
-- **Pick the most specific topic.** Not \`auth\` — \`auth-magic-link-rate-limit\`.
-  Topic is a hard filter at recall time. Generic topics hide the memory in
-  a noisy bucket where it competes with everything else in the area.
-- **Include 2+ retrievable identifiers.** File paths, function names, table
-  columns, ticket IDs, exact error strings, the literal terms a future query
-  will use. \`AccountingService.closePeriod()\` beats "the accounting code."
-  \`tblMemberDetails.activation_date\` beats "the activation column."
-  \`schema/072-period-close.sql\` beats "the migration."
-- **Write in the vocabulary of the future question.** When you imagine asking
-  this in three months, what nouns will you use? Use those nouns. Don't
-  paraphrase the user's domain language into your own neutral summary.
-- **Name the CATEGORY as well as the specifics — both, always.** Specifics
-  make a memory precise; category words make it *reachable*. A memory that
-  says "private plan memory peaked 88%, scale P1v3 -> P2v3" never says
-  "Azure" or "App Service Plan", so a question asked in those words cannot
-  find it — measured on a real store, that memory was not in the top 40
-  candidates for "azure app service plan capacity increase". Write the
-  system / product / domain nouns (Azure App Service Plan, Freshdesk ticket,
-  MySQL connection pool, ShowConnect scoring) NEXT TO the identifiers.
-  Note this cuts against "pick the most specific topic" above: that rule is
-  about the \`topic\` TAG, not a licence to omit the category from the body.
-  Measured on an 11k-engram store: 94% of tagged memories are missing at
-  least one of their own topical terms from the body, and 66% of those
-  terms never appear in the text at all.
-- **Tags are NOT a substitute for body text.** Only BM25 indexes tags. The
-  embedding is built from \`concept + content\` and the cross-encoder rerank
-  passage is built from \`concept + content\` — neither sees tags. So a word
-  that exists only as a tag is invisible to two of the three retrieval
-  channels, including the one that decides final ordering. Tag it *and*
-  write it.
-- **Reserve canonical for stable invariants.** Decisions, requirements,
-  hard facts, cross-agent shared context. Working class (default) is correct
-  for findings, observations, and progress notes. The canonical floor is
-  0.7 salience — overusing it pollutes the canonical layer and the floor
-  loses meaning.
-- **Include the why for feedback memories.** A rule without a reason can't
-  be applied to edge cases. "Don't mock the database" is brittle. "Don't
-  mock the database — last quarter mocked tests masked a broken migration"
-  is portable to new situations.
-
-### Tagging rules (REQUIRED — AWM's prefix-tag retrieval boost depends on these)
-
-Every \`memory_write\` should pass these structured fields. AWM stores each as a
-prefix-tag like \`proj=\`, \`topic=\`, \`intent=\`, etc. and uses them for BM25
-and entity-bridge boosts at recall time.
-
-| Field | Required? | Format | Example |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| \`project\` | **YES** | one short word matching the current project | \`"EquiHub"\`, \`"AWM"\`, \`"USEA-Agent"\` |
-| \`topic\` | **YES** | one or more lowercase area words | \`"database-migration"\`, \`"benchmarks"\` |
-| \`intent\` | **YES** | one of: \`decision\` / \`finding\` / \`todo\` / \`question\` / \`context\` | \`"finding"\` |
-| \`confidence_level\` | **YES** | \`verified\` (tested) / \`observed\` (read in code) / \`assumed\` (reasoning) | \`"verified"\` |
-| \`source\` | recommended | \`code-reading\` / \`debugging\` / \`discussion\` / \`research\` / \`testing\` / \`observation\` | \`"testing"\` |
-| \`memory_class\` | when stable | \`canonical\` (source-of-truth, 0.7 floor, never staged) / \`working\` (default) / \`ephemeral\` | \`"canonical"\` |
-| \`session_id\` | recommended | current conversation ID for entity-bridge boost | autogenerated |
-| \`tags\` | when applicable | extra prefix-tags for IDs and dates | \`["ticket=18360", "date=2026-05-11"]\` |
-
-**Always add identifier tags when present in the content:**
-- \`ticket=<id>\` for Freshdesk tickets
-- \`member=<id>\` for member IDs
-- \`horse=<id>\` for horse_member_id
-- \`usef=<id>\` for USEF lookups
-- \`date=YYYY-MM-DD\` for temporal anchoring (ISO format)
-- \`person=<Name>\` for stakeholder quotes / decisions
-- \`version=<X.Y.Z>\` for release-specific findings
-
-### Entity index — exact-match recall for named things (default off)
-Structured identifier tags (\`ticket=\`, \`person=\`, \`horse=\`, \`member=\`, bare 4+ digit
-ids, etc.) feed a dedicated entity inverted index, separate from BM25/embedding scoring.
-A query naming an entity ("ticket 19252", "Kaleigh Collett") can reach the memory through
-this index even when the wording doesn't lexically match — it's a deterministic exact
-lookup, immune to vocabulary mismatch. Keep identifier tags exact and consistent for
-this reason, not just for the BM25 boost described above.
-
-Off by default; opt in with \`AWM_ENTITY_INDEX_FETCH=1\` (bounded by
-\`AWM_ENTITY_INDEX_CAP\`, default 12). Matched entities get no score boost — they're
-guaranteed a reranker audition instead, so the cross-encoder alone decides whether they
-surface. Worth trialing on identifier-heavy workloads (ticket/event numbers, named
-people/things you refer to by name often); not yet the default pending evaluation.
-
-### Temporal validity — memories that expire or start in the future
-\`memory_write\` accepts \`valid_from\` / \`valid_to\` (ISO dates). Use \`valid_to\` on
-**operational** facts with a real shelf life — a deploy state, "waiting on X's reply",
-a ticket status — so the memory expires instead of relying on you to remember it's
-stale. Recall renders \`[valid until …]\` on results carrying this field. Use
-\`valid_from\` for a fact that becomes true on a known future date (a policy change, a
-season that hasn't started yet). Don't set either for durable facts — most memories
-don't need them.
-
-### Memory classes (controls how strictly the salience filter gates the write)
-- \`memory_class: canonical\` — source-of-truth memories. Floor 0.7 salience, never staged.
-  Use for: user-stated decisions, project requirements, verified architectural facts,
-  cross-agent shared context. **In a hive (multi-agent) setup, always use \`canonical\`
-  for writes that other agents must be able to recall** — the default \`working\` class
-  may get filtered.
-- \`memory_class: working\` (default) — observations and findings. Salience-gated.
-- \`memory_class: ephemeral\` — short-lived context that should decay quickly.
-
-### Salience auto-promotion (defense in depth)
-The salience filter automatically promotes certain content patterns even if you forget
-to set \`memory_class\` explicitly:
-- **User feedback** — content starting with "Robert said…", "Katherine directed…",
-  "Nancy decided…" etc. auto-promotes to canonical. So quoting the user verbatim
-  always preserves the decision.
-- **Verified operational records** — content with an action verb (Submitted, Finalized,
-  Completed, Reconciled, Triaged, Posted, Resolved, Stamped, Pushed, Deployed, Migrated,
-  Imported, Exported, Backfilled) plus 2+ concrete identifiers (ISO date \`YYYY-MM-DD\`,
-  or contextual numeric IDs like "event 18969", "ticket #18330", "USEF 341980") gets
-  a 0.45 salience floor. So batch summaries with real IDs survive even when topic
-  terms repeat.
-
-If neither pattern applies and you want a memory to definitely survive, set
-\`memory_class: canonical\` explicitly. Don't rely on auto-promotion for important writes.
-
-### Recall memory when:
-- **BEFORE stating ANY fact about how a system works** — recall first; if AWM doesn't
-  have it, read the code. Never guess and present it as fact.
-- **BEFORE searching the filesystem** — recall first; AWM is faster and has cross-session
-  knowledge that file search doesn't.
-- Starting work on a new task or subsystem
-- Re-entering code you haven't touched recently
-- After a failed attempt — check if there's prior knowledge
-- Before refactoring or making architectural changes
-- When a topic comes up that you might have prior context on
-
-Recall is fast (~300ms typical). Use it freely.
-
-### Chain recalls — one hop per call
-
-AWM returns what matches your query. It does **not** walk from that answer to the next
-fact, and it is not meant to: it is active memory, holding what you need right now.
-Following a chain to the next thing is **your** job — recall, read, recall again, each
-result becoming the cue for the next query.
-
-So when a question refers to something **by its role instead of its name**, you have a
-chain, not a query:
-
-> *"What is the codename of the project owned by my scheduler?"*
-
-That is three lookups, not one:
-
-1. recall \`who is my scheduler\` → a name
-2. recall \`what project does <that name> own\` → a project
-3. recall \`<that project> codename\` → the answer
-
-**The failure mode is answering from the first recall.** A single query blending all
-three terms returns the most *salient* related memory, not the correct one — measured,
-that returns the main project's codename with complete confidence, and it is wrong.
-Each hop on its own is an ordinary, reliable recall; the chain only breaks when you stop
-asking.
-
-Tells that you are looking at a chain: a possessive or relative clause naming an entity
-by role rather than identity (\`my scheduler\`, \`the owner of X\`, \`whoever signed
-off on Y\`), or a rule that operates on an attribute you have not looked up yet (\`the
-release tag of the project we discussed\` needs that project's codename first). If
-resolving the question requires a fact you would have to *derive*, recall the fact
-instead.
-
-### Recall strategy (when one query isn't enough)
-AWM's adaptive retrieval handles most query variations natively — synonym
-expansion, multi-channel scoring, embedding + BM25 + reranker agreement.
-A single recall is usually enough.
-
-When it isn't:
-- **If the first recall returns nothing or returns the wrong things, reformulate.**
-  Try a second query with different phrasing — synonyms, more specific nouns,
-  the exact identifier from the code rather than the conceptual name. Two or
-  three recalls cost less than one filesystem search.
-- **Use the words a domain expert would use, not generic English.** "Period
-  close lock" not "accounting feature"; "magic link rate limit" not "auth issue."
-- **For broad exploration, pass \`mode: "exploratory"\`** — wider candidate
-  pool, lower precision floor. For specific lookups, leave mode unset (auto).
-- **Don't ensemble more than 3 reformulations.** If three different phrasings
-  return nothing, the memory probably isn't there — read the code instead of
-  burning more recalls.
-
-### Recall tuning — opt-in parameters
-Default \`memory_recall\` is tuned for the common case. Four opt-in parameters change
-the cost/quality tradeoff. Use them when the default doesn't match what you need.
-
-- **\`granularity: 'compact'\`** — every result carries a 200-char \`summary\`
-  field with a query-aware snippet (the densest window of query terms in the
-  content). Use this when you expect to scan 5+ results to find one — saves
-  ~70% of recall output tokens. The full content stays available in
-  \`engram.content\` if you want to drill into a specific result.
-- **\`granularity: 'auto'\`** — confidence-adaptive. If the top result is a clear
-  winner, it gets a longer summary while the rest are compact. If confidence
-  is uniform across results, everything is compact. Use when you don't know
-  in advance whether one result will dominate.
-- **\`require_confidence\`** — abstention. The default (0.05) is already a light
-  gate: when the top results don't stand out from the rest, recall returns
-  nothing and the reply says **\`RECALL ABSTAINED\`** with the count it withheld.
-  An empty result *without* that line is genuine absence. The gate is on the
-  SHAPE of the score distribution, not relevance — so raising it silences
-  specific questions with one clear winner first (measured: 0.25 abstained on
-  two identifier queries scoring 0.26–0.38 while passing a vague one at 0.92).
-  Leave it alone for ordinary recall; \`0.10\` is the ceiling that still helps for
-  push-style use where nobody asked. When abstention fires, reformulate once
-  with the exact identifier, then read the code — don't retry with a lower
-  threshold to force an answer.
-- **\`workspace: "<name>"\`** — hive-mode recall across all agents in the
-  workspace. Use when other agents may have written canonical knowledge you
-  need. Default is agent-scoped (your own memories only). Can also be set
-  globally via the \`AWM_WORKSPACE\` env var. Memories live in the agent pool
-  they were written to; if a session lands in an unexpected pool, \`memory_whoami\`
-  says which one before you conclude the memory is missing.
-
-### Keep memory fresh
-- After recalling a memory, if you observe the real state is different → call
-  \`memory_supersede\` immediately with the corrected version.
-- After using a recalled memory: call \`memory_feedback\` (useful/not-useful) **with the
-  \`recall_id\`** printed at the end of the recall output (\`[recall_id: …]\`). That id
-  joins the feedback to the recall that produced it, which is what lets AWM learn
-  which recalls were worth their tokens; feedback without it is a bare vote.
-- If you discover a memory is factually wrong: \`memory_retract\` to remove it.
-- **If you bypass AWM (file-memory, in-context notes, "I'll just remember"), the memory
-  drifts out of date. The system relies on you to keep it current. This is the #1
-  failure mode.**
-
-### Cognition recipes — YOU do the thinking, AWM keeps the result
-AWM contains no LLM. When memory needs real thinking — distilling a repeatable
-procedure, reflecting on a failure — AWM hands YOU a versioned recipe (prompt +
-strict output shape) and you run it as a SEPARATE focused pass, then write the
-result back as an ordinary memory with provenance.
-
-- \`memory_task_end\` responses include the recipe invitations. Honor the gates:
-  skill-derivation only after a genuinely procedural task (3+ tool calls or a
-  delegated sub-task); friction-lesson only after a failure/retry/wrong assumption.
-- Run each recipe as its own focused pass — do NOT bundle it with other
-  reasoning; bundled passes reliably drop the output.
-- Write back exactly per the recipe's contract: \`origin_class: 'recipe'\` +
-  \`recipe_id\` (e.g. \`skill-derivation@1\`), concept prefixed \`skill: \` or
-  \`lesson: \`. AWM validates the shape and rejects malformed or unknown-recipe
-  writes with the contract echoed back — fix and retry, don't drop the insight.
-- Re-deriving the same skill name reinforces the existing memory instead of
-  duplicating it, so don't fear writing a skill you may have written before.
-
-### Content fade — write-and-forget is safe
-Un-recalled engrams gradually fade their content while preserving cue pathways
-(concept + tags + embedding stay intact). This is Paper 1 — storage
-degradation. Practical implications:
-
-- **Don't manually purge memories** to "save space." The system already
-  compresses unused content. Old memories stay findable via cue match even
-  when their body has decayed.
-- **Don't over-pin with \`memory_class: canonical\`** to fight fade. Canonical
-  only changes salience gating at write time, not fade behavior. Fade
-  affects un-recalled engrams of any class.
-- **Recall keeps content alive.** Every recall touches the engram and resets
-  its fade clock. Frequently-recalled memories stay full-fidelity automatically.
-- **Supersede is the right tool for stale facts.** When you observe a memory
-  is outdated, call \`memory_supersede\` — the new version inherits the old
-  one's coherent associations (counter-narrative replacement) so cue
-  pathways carry forward to the replacement.
-
-### Example — good vs bad memory_write
-
-**BAD** (no prefix tags, vague concept, can't be recalled by future queries):
-\`\`\`
-memory_write(
-  concept="found a bug",
-  content="The thing I was looking at was broken so I fixed it."
-)
-\`\`\`
-
-**GOOD** (rich identifiers, structured metadata, prefix tags):
-\`\`\`
-memory_write(
-  concept="EquiHub period-close BLOCKED check missing server-side",
-  content="apps/web/app/(accounting)/accounting/period-close/page.tsx had client-only BLOCKED enforcement. Fixed by adding server-side check in AccountingService.closePeriod() per schema/072-period-close.sql. Without server-side check a malicious request could bypass via direct API call.",
-  project="EquiHub",
-  topic="accounting",
-  intent="finding",
-  confidence_level="verified",
-  source="debugging",
-  memory_class="canonical",
-  tags=["ticket=18360", "person=Robert", "date=2026-05-11", "topic=period-close", "topic=security"]
-)
-\`\`\`
-
-### Also:
-- To track work items: memory_task_add, memory_task_update, memory_task_list, memory_task_next
-- \`memory_whoami\` (MCP tool) / \`GET /whoami\` — identify the instance you're actually
-  talking to: agent id, workspace, mode, backend, store path, code provenance, sibling
-  agent spaces sharing the store. Call this FIRST whenever you're unsure which store,
-  which agent identity, or which running code you're dealing with — before reasoning
-  about AWM's own state from a stale memory or an assumed port number.
-- AWM is shared across all agents in real time. When any agent writes or supersedes a
-  memory, every other agent can recall it immediately — but only within the same
-  workspace and agent scope.
-
-### Output compression (token efficiency, output-only)
-When a tool returns a LARGE STRUCTURED result you need to keep in context — a JSON
-array of records, query rows, a log dump, an API response — pass it through
-\`compress_output\` first. It re-encodes the data as TOON (a compact, lossless,
-schema-aware tabular form of JSON), cutting ~50-65% of the tokens at no
-comprehension cost. This is output-only: it never changes the data or your memories.
-- Use it on big STRUCTURED outputs, not on prose. Prose is returned unchanged —
-  for trimming memory prose, use recall \`granularity: 'compact'\` instead.
-- It returns a \`ref\`; call \`retrieve_original(ref)\` if you later need the exact
-  verbatim source (e.g. to hand it to another tool unchanged).
-- Don't bother for small outputs — it only compresses when the saving is worthwhile
-  and falls back to plain JSON if TOON wouldn't reproduce the data exactly.
-
-### Backend (SQLite vs PGlite)
-AWM ships two storage backends. The installer picks SQLite by default; both
-are functionally equivalent for cognitive workloads, but differ in operational
-guarantees:
-
-- **SQLite** (default) — embedded, **multi-process safe** via WAL mode. Best
-  for single-machine setups and MCP scenarios where multiple Claude Code
-  sessions may open the same database concurrently.
-- **PGlite** — embedded Postgres (WASM) with pgvector. **Single-process only**
-  — two MCP processes against the same \`memory-pglite/\` directory will
-  abort the second. Pick via \`AWM_STORE_BACKEND=pglite\` and
-  \`AWM_DB_PATH=path/to/memory-pglite\`.
-- **Auto-detect** — if \`AWM_DB_PATH\` points to a directory that already
-  exists, AWM detects PGlite; a file → SQLite. No explicit
-  \`AWM_STORE_BACKEND\` needed when an existing DB is present.
-
-For the comparison table (recall quality parity, BM25 vs \`ts_rank_cd\`,
-multi-process guarantees), see \`docs/pglite-feature-parity.md\`.
-
-### Diagnostics / escape hatches (env vars, only if you know why)
-Each optimisation is gated by an env var so it can be disabled for A/B testing if a
-regression appears in your workload. \`memory_whoami\` prints the active fingerprint.
-
-Retrieval (set ON by \`awm setup\` since 0.14.6 — the measured-good configuration):
-- \`AWM_RERANK2=1\` — second-stage rerank by the cross-encoder's own score.
-- \`AWM_RERANK_WINDOW=query\` — 400-char rerank window on the densest query-term
-  region instead of the prefix (25% → 87.5% on long memories).
-- \`AWM_RERANK_TAGS=1\` — tags fed into the rerank passage (+7.4pp s@1).
-
-Hook sidecar (0.14.2):
-- \`AWM_HOOK_PORT=8401\` / \`AWM_HOOK_PORT_RANGE=10\` — each MCP process binds the
-  first free port in the range, so several sessions can run at once. The shipped
-  hooks find their own session's sidecar by probing the range and matching
-  \`agentId\` on \`/health\`; \`memory_whoami\` reports the port actually bound.
-
-Recall pipeline:
-- \`AWM_DISABLE_POOL_FILTER=1\` — disables the candidate pool reduction
-  pre-filter in recall. Reverts to scoring all active candidates.
-- \`AWM_ENTITY_INDEX_FETCH=1\` — see "Entity index" above (default off; measured
-  no effect on the real-store benchmark, 0.14.5).
-- \`AWM_DISABLE_SLIM_CACHE=1\` — disables the in-memory slim cache.
-  Reverts to per-recall SQL fetch + Buffer→Float32Array conversion.
-- \`AWM_DISABLE_RERANK_SKIP=1\` — disables the cross-encoder skip on
-  clear-winner queries. Forces every recall through the reranker.
-- \`AWM_DISABLE_EXPANSION_CACHE=1\` — disables the query expansion skip
-  heuristic + LRU cache. Forces every recall through flan-t5-small.
-
-Write pipeline + lifecycle:
-- \`AWM_SLOW_WRITE_MS=250\` — any write slower than this logs one stderr
-  line with a phase-time breakdown (embed/novelty/persist, event-loop lag,
-  embed-model cold-load ms). \`0\` disables. Useful for diagnosing why a session's
-  first write/recall feels slow.
-- \`AWM_REINFORCE_MAX_CONTENT_LEN=1500\` — max chars an engram's content
-  can grow to via merge-on-reinforce (drop-oldest on overflow). Higher =
-  preserves more reinforced detail; lower = leaner recall output.
-- \`AWM_REINFORCE_MERGE_CONTENT=0\` — disable content merge on reinforce.
-  Reverts to pre-0.8.5 behavior (discard new content, only bump confidence).
-- \`AWM_NOVELTY_EMBED=0\` — disable the cosine channel in novelty
-  computation. BM25-only fallback. Reverts to pre-0.8.5 novelty.
-- \`AWM_GRANULARITY_COMPACT_LEN=200\` — char budget for query-aware snippet
-  in \`granularity: 'compact'\` mode.
-- \`AWM_GRANULARITY_FULL_LEN=1000\` — char budget for the top result in
-  \`granularity: 'auto'\` mode when there's a clear winner.
-
-PGlite backend:
-- \`AWM_PGLITE_BM25_M=1\` — multiplier on PGlite \`ts_rank_cd\` to calibrate
-  against SQLite FTS5 BM25 distribution. M=1 (default) is passthrough;
-  higher M boosts PGlite scores at the cost of recall-ranking precision
-  (see CHANGELOG 0.8.5 follow-up).
-- \`AWM_IVFFLAT_PROBES=5\` — pgvector ivfflat probes per query. Higher =
-  more accurate, slower.
-
-In production, leave these all unset. Use only when diagnosing a suspected
-recall-quality regression.
+export const AWM_INSTRUCTION_CONTENT = `
+## Memory (AWM) — MANDATORY
+
+**AWM is THE memory system.** Use it via the \`agent-working-memory\` MCP server
+(preferred) or HTTP at \`http://127.0.0.1:8400\` (fallback). The file-based
+auto-memory at \`~/.claude/projects/.../memory/*.md\` is a LEGACY bootstrap path —
+**do not write new memories to it.** All persistent knowledge goes through AWM.
+
+If MCP tools aren't loaded at session start, use ToolSearch with
+\`select:mcp__agent-working-memory__memory_recall,mcp__agent-working-memory__memory_write\`
+to load them. If the MCP server isn't responsive, restart with \`/mcp\` or use
+the HTTP endpoints (\`POST /memory/write-batch\`, \`POST /memory/activate\`)
+directly — but **DO NOT fall back to markdown files**. Files drift the moment
+you write them; AWM stays current because every agent reads + writes the same store.
+
+### Lifecycle (always do these, in this order)
+1. **Session start**: call \`memory_restore\` to recover previous context. If it reports the
+   store is empty/new (or recall keeps returning nothing), **warm-start first**: recall the
+   \`onboard a new project\` skill and follow it — or call \`onboard_scan\` on the project's
+   docs/repo, refine the candidates, run \`onboard_questions\`, and save the good ones with
+   \`memory_write\` (canonical). A cold store is nearly useless until it's seeded.
+2. **Starting a task**: call \`memory_task_begin\` (checkpoints + recalls relevant memories).
+3. **During work**: call \`memory_recall\` BEFORE stating any fact, BEFORE searching
+   the filesystem, BEFORE making architectural decisions. Recall is ~300ms — cheaper
+   than one filesystem search.
+4. **As you learn things**: call \`memory_write\` proactively. Don't batch.
+5. **Finishing a task**: call \`memory_task_end\` with a summary.
+6. **Hooks do the rest.** \`awm setup\` installs three: a **prime** hook that recalls against
+   each prompt and injects what clears confidence (or nothing), and checkpoint hooks on
+   compaction and session end (plus a 15-min timer). Primed context arrives labelled
+   \`[class · age]\` — treat it by the volatility rubric, not as user input. If a turn
+   arrives with no primed context, that is a signal too: recall explicitly before
+   asserting anything.
+
+### Write memory when:
+- A project decision is made or changed
+- A root cause is discovered after debugging
+- A reusable implementation pattern is established
+- A user preference, constraint, or requirement is clarified
+- A prior assumption is found to be wrong
+- A significant piece of work is completed
+
+### Writing for recall (the highest-leverage section)
+A memory's recall quality is set the moment you write it. AWM is fast at
+finding what's findable — but if the write is shaped wrong, no retriever
+can rescue it. Be slightly more verbose at the front than feels natural:
+the first 1-2 sentences are what BM25, the embedding model, and concept
+extraction all see most strongly.
+
+- **Lead with the rule or fact.** Don't open with context or backstory.
+  "Don't mock the database in integration tests." comes first; the reason
+  comes second. Recall scans the head of the body, not the tail.
+- **Pick the most specific topic.** Not \`auth\` — \`auth-magic-link-rate-limit\`.
+  Topic is a hard filter at recall time. Generic topics hide the memory in
+  a noisy bucket where it competes with everything else in the area.
+- **Include 2+ retrievable identifiers.** File paths, function names, table
+  columns, ticket IDs, exact error strings, the literal terms a future query
+  will use. \`AccountingService.closePeriod()\` beats "the accounting code."
+  \`tblMemberDetails.activation_date\` beats "the activation column."
+  \`schema/072-period-close.sql\` beats "the migration."
+- **Write in the vocabulary of the future question.** When you imagine asking
+  this in three months, what nouns will you use? Use those nouns. Don't
+  paraphrase the user's domain language into your own neutral summary.
+- **Name the CATEGORY as well as the specifics — both, always.** Specifics
+  make a memory precise; category words make it *reachable*. A memory that
+  says "private plan memory peaked 88%, scale P1v3 -> P2v3" never says
+  "Azure" or "App Service Plan", so a question asked in those words cannot
+  find it — measured on a real store, that memory was not in the top 40
+  candidates for "azure app service plan capacity increase". Write the
+  system / product / domain nouns (Azure App Service Plan, Freshdesk ticket,
+  MySQL connection pool, ShowConnect scoring) NEXT TO the identifiers.
+  Note this cuts against "pick the most specific topic" above: that rule is
+  about the \`topic\` TAG, not a licence to omit the category from the body.
+  Measured on an 11k-engram store: 94% of tagged memories are missing at
+  least one of their own topical terms from the body, and 66% of those
+  terms never appear in the text at all.
+- **Tags are NOT a substitute for body text.** Only BM25 indexes tags. The
+  embedding is built from \`concept + content\` and the cross-encoder rerank
+  passage is built from \`concept + content\` — neither sees tags. So a word
+  that exists only as a tag is invisible to two of the three retrieval
+  channels, including the one that decides final ordering. Tag it *and*
+  write it.
+- **Reserve canonical for stable invariants.** Decisions, requirements,
+  hard facts, cross-agent shared context. Working class (default) is correct
+  for findings, observations, and progress notes. The canonical floor is
+  0.7 salience — overusing it pollutes the canonical layer and the floor
+  loses meaning.
+- **Include the why for feedback memories.** A rule without a reason can't
+  be applied to edge cases. "Don't mock the database" is brittle. "Don't
+  mock the database — last quarter mocked tests masked a broken migration"
+  is portable to new situations.
+
+### Tagging rules (REQUIRED — AWM's prefix-tag retrieval boost depends on these)
+
+Every \`memory_write\` should pass these structured fields. AWM stores each as a
+prefix-tag like \`proj=\`, \`topic=\`, \`intent=\`, etc. and uses them for BM25
+and entity-bridge boosts at recall time.
+
+| Field | Required? | Format | Example |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| \`project\` | **YES** | one short word matching the current project | \`"EquiHub"\`, \`"AWM"\`, \`"USEA-Agent"\` |
+| \`topic\` | **YES** | one or more lowercase area words | \`"database-migration"\`, \`"benchmarks"\` |
+| \`intent\` | **YES** | one of: \`decision\` / \`finding\` / \`todo\` / \`question\` / \`context\` | \`"finding"\` |
+| \`confidence_level\` | **YES** | \`verified\` (tested) / \`observed\` (read in code) / \`assumed\` (reasoning) | \`"verified"\` |
+| \`source\` | recommended | \`code-reading\` / \`debugging\` / \`discussion\` / \`research\` / \`testing\` / \`observation\` | \`"testing"\` |
+| \`memory_class\` | when stable | \`canonical\` (source-of-truth, 0.7 floor, never staged) / \`working\` (default) / \`ephemeral\` | \`"canonical"\` |
+| \`session_id\` | recommended | current conversation ID for entity-bridge boost | autogenerated |
+| \`tags\` | when applicable | extra prefix-tags for IDs and dates | \`["ticket=18360", "date=2026-05-11"]\` |
+
+**Always add identifier tags when present in the content:**
+- \`ticket=<id>\` for Freshdesk tickets
+- \`member=<id>\` for member IDs
+- \`horse=<id>\` for horse_member_id
+- \`usef=<id>\` for USEF lookups
+- \`date=YYYY-MM-DD\` for temporal anchoring (ISO format)
+- \`person=<Name>\` for stakeholder quotes / decisions
+- \`version=<X.Y.Z>\` for release-specific findings
+
+### Entity index — exact-match recall for named things (default off)
+Structured identifier tags (\`ticket=\`, \`person=\`, \`horse=\`, \`member=\`, bare 4+ digit
+ids, etc.) feed a dedicated entity inverted index, separate from BM25/embedding scoring.
+A query naming an entity ("ticket 19252", "Kaleigh Collett") can reach the memory through
+this index even when the wording doesn't lexically match — it's a deterministic exact
+lookup, immune to vocabulary mismatch. Keep identifier tags exact and consistent for
+this reason, not just for the BM25 boost described above.
+
+Off by default; opt in with \`AWM_ENTITY_INDEX_FETCH=1\` (bounded by
+\`AWM_ENTITY_INDEX_CAP\`, default 12). Matched entities get no score boost — they're
+guaranteed a reranker audition instead, so the cross-encoder alone decides whether they
+surface. Worth trialing on identifier-heavy workloads (ticket/event numbers, named
+people/things you refer to by name often); not yet the default pending evaluation.
+
+### Temporal validity — memories that expire or start in the future
+\`memory_write\` accepts \`valid_from\` / \`valid_to\` (ISO dates). Use \`valid_to\` on
+**operational** facts with a real shelf life — a deploy state, "waiting on X's reply",
+a ticket status — so the memory expires instead of relying on you to remember it's
+stale. Recall renders \`[valid until …]\` on results carrying this field. Use
+\`valid_from\` for a fact that becomes true on a known future date (a policy change, a
+season that hasn't started yet). Don't set either for durable facts — most memories
+don't need them.
+
+### Memory classes (controls how strictly the salience filter gates the write)
+- \`memory_class: canonical\` — source-of-truth memories. Floor 0.7 salience, never staged.
+  Use for: user-stated decisions, project requirements, verified architectural facts,
+  cross-agent shared context. **In a hive (multi-agent) setup, always use \`canonical\`
+  for writes that other agents must be able to recall** — the default \`working\` class
+  may get filtered.
+- \`memory_class: working\` (default) — observations and findings. Salience-gated.
+- \`memory_class: ephemeral\` — short-lived context that should decay quickly.
+
+### Salience auto-promotion (defense in depth)
+The salience filter automatically promotes certain content patterns even if you forget
+to set \`memory_class\` explicitly:
+- **User feedback** — content starting with "Robert said…", "Katherine directed…",
+  "Nancy decided…" etc. auto-promotes to canonical. So quoting the user verbatim
+  always preserves the decision.
+- **Verified operational records** — content with an action verb (Submitted, Finalized,
+  Completed, Reconciled, Triaged, Posted, Resolved, Stamped, Pushed, Deployed, Migrated,
+  Imported, Exported, Backfilled) plus 2+ concrete identifiers (ISO date \`YYYY-MM-DD\`,
+  or contextual numeric IDs like "event 18969", "ticket #18330", "USEF 341980") gets
+  a 0.45 salience floor. So batch summaries with real IDs survive even when topic
+  terms repeat.
+
+If neither pattern applies and you want a memory to definitely survive, set
+\`memory_class: canonical\` explicitly. Don't rely on auto-promotion for important writes.
+
+### Recall memory when:
+- **BEFORE stating ANY fact about how a system works** — recall first; if AWM doesn't
+  have it, read the code. Never guess and present it as fact.
+- **BEFORE searching the filesystem** — recall first; AWM is faster and has cross-session
+  knowledge that file search doesn't.
+- Starting work on a new task or subsystem
+- Re-entering code you haven't touched recently
+- After a failed attempt — check if there's prior knowledge
+- Before refactoring or making architectural changes
+- When a topic comes up that you might have prior context on
+
+Recall is fast (~300ms typical). Use it freely.
+
+### Chain recalls — one hop per call
+
+AWM returns what matches your query. It does **not** walk from that answer to the next
+fact, and it is not meant to: it is active memory, holding what you need right now.
+Following a chain to the next thing is **your** job — recall, read, recall again, each
+result becoming the cue for the next query.
+
+So when a question refers to something **by its role instead of its name**, you have a
+chain, not a query:
+
+> *"What is the codename of the project owned by my scheduler?"*
+
+That is three lookups, not one:
+
+1. recall \`who is my scheduler\` → a name
+2. recall \`what project does <that name> own\` → a project
+3. recall \`<that project> codename\` → the answer
+
+**The failure mode is answering from the first recall.** A single query blending all
+three terms returns the most *salient* related memory, not the correct one — measured,
+that returns the main project's codename with complete confidence, and it is wrong.
+Each hop on its own is an ordinary, reliable recall; the chain only breaks when you stop
+asking.
+
+Tells that you are looking at a chain: a possessive or relative clause naming an entity
+by role rather than identity (\`my scheduler\`, \`the owner of X\`, \`whoever signed
+off on Y\`), or a rule that operates on an attribute you have not looked up yet (\`the
+release tag of the project we discussed\` needs that project's codename first). If
+resolving the question requires a fact you would have to *derive*, recall the fact
+instead.
+
+### Recall strategy (when one query isn't enough)
+AWM's adaptive retrieval handles most query variations natively — synonym
+expansion, multi-channel scoring, embedding + BM25 + reranker agreement.
+A single recall is usually enough.
+
+When it isn't:
+- **If the first recall returns nothing or returns the wrong things, reformulate.**
+  Try a second query with different phrasing — synonyms, more specific nouns,
+  the exact identifier from the code rather than the conceptual name. Two or
+  three recalls cost less than one filesystem search.
+- **Use the words a domain expert would use, not generic English.** "Period
+  close lock" not "accounting feature"; "magic link rate limit" not "auth issue."
+- **For broad exploration, pass \`mode: "exploratory"\`** — wider candidate
+  pool, lower precision floor. For specific lookups, leave mode unset (auto).
+- **Don't ensemble more than 3 reformulations.** If three different phrasings
+  return nothing, the memory probably isn't there — read the code instead of
+  burning more recalls.
+
+### Recall tuning — opt-in parameters
+Default \`memory_recall\` is tuned for the common case. Four opt-in parameters change
+the cost/quality tradeoff. Use them when the default doesn't match what you need.
+
+- **\`granularity: 'compact'\`** — every result carries a 200-char \`summary\`
+  field with a query-aware snippet (the densest window of query terms in the
+  content). Use this when you expect to scan 5+ results to find one — saves
+  ~70% of recall output tokens. The full content stays available in
+  \`engram.content\` if you want to drill into a specific result.
+- **\`granularity: 'auto'\`** — confidence-adaptive. If the top result is a clear
+  winner, it gets a longer summary while the rest are compact. If confidence
+  is uniform across results, everything is compact. Use when you don't know
+  in advance whether one result will dominate.
+- **\`require_confidence\`** — abstention. The default (0.05) is already a light
+  gate: when the top results don't stand out from the rest, recall returns
+  nothing and the reply says **\`RECALL ABSTAINED\`** with the count it withheld.
+  An empty result *without* that line is genuine absence. The gate is on the
+  SHAPE of the score distribution, not relevance — so raising it silences
+  specific questions with one clear winner first (measured: 0.25 abstained on
+  two identifier queries scoring 0.26–0.38 while passing a vague one at 0.92).
+  Leave it alone for ordinary recall; \`0.10\` is the ceiling that still helps for
+  push-style use where nobody asked. When abstention fires, reformulate once
+  with the exact identifier, then read the code — don't retry with a lower
+  threshold to force an answer.
+- **\`workspace: "<name>"\`** — hive-mode recall across all agents in the
+  workspace. Use when other agents may have written canonical knowledge you
+  need. Default is agent-scoped (your own memories only). Can also be set
+  globally via the \`AWM_WORKSPACE\` env var. Memories live in the agent pool
+  they were written to; if a session lands in an unexpected pool, \`memory_whoami\`
+  says which one before you conclude the memory is missing.
+
+### Keep memory fresh
+- After recalling a memory, if you observe the real state is different → call
+  \`memory_supersede\` immediately with the corrected version.
+- After using a recalled memory: call \`memory_feedback\` (useful/not-useful) **with the
+  \`recall_id\`** printed at the end of the recall output (\`[recall_id: …]\`). That id
+  joins the feedback to the recall that produced it, which is what lets AWM learn
+  which recalls were worth their tokens; feedback without it is a bare vote.
+- If you discover a memory is factually wrong: \`memory_retract\` to remove it.
+- **If you bypass AWM (file-memory, in-context notes, "I'll just remember"), the memory
+  drifts out of date. The system relies on you to keep it current. This is the #1
+  failure mode.**
+
+### Cognition recipes — YOU do the thinking, AWM keeps the result
+AWM contains no LLM. When memory needs real thinking — distilling a repeatable
+procedure, reflecting on a failure — AWM hands YOU a versioned recipe (prompt +
+strict output shape) and you run it as a SEPARATE focused pass, then write the
+result back as an ordinary memory with provenance.
+
+- \`memory_task_end\` responses include the recipe invitations. Honor the gates:
+  skill-derivation only after a genuinely procedural task (3+ tool calls or a
+  delegated sub-task); friction-lesson only after a failure/retry/wrong assumption.
+- Run each recipe as its own focused pass — do NOT bundle it with other
+  reasoning; bundled passes reliably drop the output.
+- Write back exactly per the recipe's contract: \`origin_class: 'recipe'\` +
+  \`recipe_id\` (e.g. \`skill-derivation@1\`), concept prefixed \`skill: \` or
+  \`lesson: \`. AWM validates the shape and rejects malformed or unknown-recipe
+  writes with the contract echoed back — fix and retry, don't drop the insight.
+- Re-deriving the same skill name reinforces the existing memory instead of
+  duplicating it, so don't fear writing a skill you may have written before.
+
+### Content fade — write-and-forget is safe
+Un-recalled engrams gradually fade their content while preserving cue pathways
+(concept + tags + embedding stay intact). This is Paper 1 — storage
+degradation. Practical implications:
+
+- **Don't manually purge memories** to "save space." The system already
+  compresses unused content. Old memories stay findable via cue match even
+  when their body has decayed.
+- **Don't over-pin with \`memory_class: canonical\`** to fight fade. Canonical
+  only changes salience gating at write time, not fade behavior. Fade
+  affects un-recalled engrams of any class.
+- **Recall keeps content alive.** Every recall touches the engram and resets
+  its fade clock. Frequently-recalled memories stay full-fidelity automatically.
+- **Supersede is the right tool for stale facts.** When you observe a memory
+  is outdated, call \`memory_supersede\` — the new version inherits the old
+  one's coherent associations (counter-narrative replacement) so cue
+  pathways carry forward to the replacement.
+
+### Example — good vs bad memory_write
+
+**BAD** (no prefix tags, vague concept, can't be recalled by future queries):
+\`\`\`
+memory_write(
+  concept="found a bug",
+  content="The thing I was looking at was broken so I fixed it."
+)
+\`\`\`
+
+**GOOD** (rich identifiers, structured metadata, prefix tags):
+\`\`\`
+memory_write(
+  concept="EquiHub period-close BLOCKED check missing server-side",
+  content="apps/web/app/(accounting)/accounting/period-close/page.tsx had client-only BLOCKED enforcement. Fixed by adding server-side check in AccountingService.closePeriod() per schema/072-period-close.sql. Without server-side check a malicious request could bypass via direct API call.",
+  project="EquiHub",
+  topic="accounting",
+  intent="finding",
+  confidence_level="verified",
+  source="debugging",
+  memory_class="canonical",
+  tags=["ticket=18360", "person=Robert", "date=2026-05-11", "topic=period-close", "topic=security"]
+)
+\`\`\`
+
+### Also:
+- To track work items: memory_task_add, memory_task_update, memory_task_list, memory_task_next
+- \`memory_whoami\` (MCP tool) / \`GET /whoami\` — identify the instance you're actually
+  talking to: agent id, workspace, mode, backend, store path, code provenance, sibling
+  agent spaces sharing the store. Call this FIRST whenever you're unsure which store,
+  which agent identity, or which running code you're dealing with — before reasoning
+  about AWM's own state from a stale memory or an assumed port number.
+- AWM is shared across all agents in real time. When any agent writes or supersedes a
+  memory, every other agent can recall it immediately — but only within the same
+  workspace and agent scope.
+
+### Output compression (token efficiency, output-only)
+When a tool returns a LARGE STRUCTURED result you need to keep in context — a JSON
+array of records, query rows, a log dump, an API response — pass it through
+\`compress_output\` first. It re-encodes the data as TOON (a compact, lossless,
+schema-aware tabular form of JSON), cutting ~50-65% of the tokens at no
+comprehension cost. This is output-only: it never changes the data or your memories.
+- Use it on big STRUCTURED outputs, not on prose. Prose is returned unchanged —
+  for trimming memory prose, use recall \`granularity: 'compact'\` instead.
+- It returns a \`ref\`; call \`retrieve_original(ref)\` if you later need the exact
+  verbatim source (e.g. to hand it to another tool unchanged).
+- Don't bother for small outputs — it only compresses when the saving is worthwhile
+  and falls back to plain JSON if TOON wouldn't reproduce the data exactly.
+
+### Backend (SQLite vs PGlite)
+AWM ships two storage backends. The installer picks SQLite by default; both
+are functionally equivalent for cognitive workloads, but differ in operational
+guarantees:
+
+- **SQLite** (default) — embedded, **multi-process safe** via WAL mode. Best
+  for single-machine setups and MCP scenarios where multiple Claude Code
+  sessions may open the same database concurrently.
+- **PGlite** — embedded Postgres (WASM) with pgvector. **Single-process only**
+  — two MCP processes against the same \`memory-pglite/\` directory will
+  abort the second. Pick via \`AWM_STORE_BACKEND=pglite\` and
+  \`AWM_DB_PATH=path/to/memory-pglite\`.
+- **Auto-detect** — if \`AWM_DB_PATH\` points to a directory that already
+  exists, AWM detects PGlite; a file → SQLite. No explicit
+  \`AWM_STORE_BACKEND\` needed when an existing DB is present.
+
+For the comparison table (recall quality parity, BM25 vs \`ts_rank_cd\`,
+multi-process guarantees), see \`docs/pglite-feature-parity.md\`.
+
+### Diagnostics / escape hatches (env vars, only if you know why)
+Each optimisation is gated by an env var so it can be disabled for A/B testing if a
+regression appears in your workload. \`memory_whoami\` prints the active fingerprint.
+
+Retrieval (set ON by \`awm setup\` since 0.14.6 — the measured-good configuration):
+- \`AWM_RERANK2=1\` — second-stage rerank by the cross-encoder's own score.
+- \`AWM_RERANK_WINDOW=query\` — 400-char rerank window on the densest query-term
+  region instead of the prefix (25% → 87.5% on long memories).
+- \`AWM_RERANK_TAGS=1\` — tags fed into the rerank passage (+7.4pp s@1).
+
+Hook sidecar (0.14.2):
+- \`AWM_HOOK_PORT=8401\` / \`AWM_HOOK_PORT_RANGE=10\` — each MCP process binds the
+  first free port in the range, so several sessions can run at once. The shipped
+  hooks find their own session's sidecar by probing the range and matching
+  \`agentId\` on \`/health\`; \`memory_whoami\` reports the port actually bound.
+
+Recall pipeline:
+- \`AWM_DISABLE_POOL_FILTER=1\` — disables the candidate pool reduction
+  pre-filter in recall. Reverts to scoring all active candidates.
+- \`AWM_ENTITY_INDEX_FETCH=1\` — see "Entity index" above (default off; measured
+  no effect on the real-store benchmark, 0.14.5).
+- \`AWM_DISABLE_SLIM_CACHE=1\` — disables the in-memory slim cache.
+  Reverts to per-recall SQL fetch + Buffer→Float32Array conversion.
+- \`AWM_DISABLE_RERANK_SKIP=1\` — disables the cross-encoder skip on
+  clear-winner queries. Forces every recall through the reranker.
+- \`AWM_DISABLE_EXPANSION_CACHE=1\` — disables the query expansion skip
+  heuristic + LRU cache. Forces every recall through flan-t5-small.
+
+Write pipeline + lifecycle:
+- \`AWM_SLOW_WRITE_MS=250\` — any write slower than this logs one stderr
+  line with a phase-time breakdown (embed/novelty/persist, event-loop lag,
+  embed-model cold-load ms). \`0\` disables. Useful for diagnosing why a session's
+  first write/recall feels slow.
+- \`AWM_REINFORCE_MAX_CONTENT_LEN=1500\` — max chars an engram's content
+  can grow to via merge-on-reinforce (drop-oldest on overflow). Higher =
+  preserves more reinforced detail; lower = leaner recall output.
+- \`AWM_REINFORCE_MERGE_CONTENT=0\` — disable content merge on reinforce.
+  Reverts to pre-0.8.5 behavior (discard new content, only bump confidence).
+- \`AWM_NOVELTY_EMBED=0\` — disable the cosine channel in novelty
+  computation. BM25-only fallback. Reverts to pre-0.8.5 novelty.
+- \`AWM_GRANULARITY_COMPACT_LEN=200\` — char budget for query-aware snippet
+  in \`granularity: 'compact'\` mode.
+- \`AWM_GRANULARITY_FULL_LEN=1000\` — char budget for the top result in
+  \`granularity: 'auto'\` mode when there's a clear winner.
+
+PGlite backend:
+- \`AWM_PGLITE_BM25_M=1\` — multiplier on PGlite \`ts_rank_cd\` to calibrate
+  against SQLite FTS5 BM25 distribution. M=1 (default) is passthrough;
+  higher M boosts PGlite scores at the cost of recall-ranking precision
+  (see CHANGELOG 0.8.5 follow-up).
+- \`AWM_IVFFLAT_PROBES=5\` — pgvector ivfflat probes per query. Higher =
+  more accurate, slower.
+
+In production, leave these all unset. Use only when diagnosing a suspected
+recall-quality regression.
 `.trimStart();
 //# sourceMappingURL=common.js.map