agent-threat-rules 3.1.1 → 3.2.0

package/rules/privilege-escalation/ATR-2026-00549-destructive-tool-without-human-approval.yaml

@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ compliance:
         review per Article 14. Trace evidence of skipped approval is a
         direct violation.
       strength: primary
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the privilege-escalation attempt (Destructive tool invocation without prior human approval)."
+      strength: primary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - subcategory: "MG.4.1"
       context: >
@@ -61,7 +64,20 @@ compliance:
         without approval are unmitigated risks; trace evidence is
         normative for assessment.
       strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the privilege-escalation attempt (Destructive tool invocation without prior human approval)."
+      strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.3 (respond to previously unknown identified risks) is supported by this rule, which surfaces the privilege-escalation attempt (Destructive tool invocation without prior human approval) so the risk can be treated."
+      strength: secondary
 
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the privilege-escalation attempt (Destructive tool invocation without prior human approval)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the privilege-escalation attempt (Destructive tool invocation without prior human approval) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: privilege-escalation
   subcategory: missing-human-approval

package/rules/privilege-escalation/ATR-2026-00551-cross-conversation-memory-write.yaml

@@ -54,13 +54,32 @@ compliance:
         tenant-isolated state and violate Article 10 data-governance
         requirements.
       strength: primary
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the privilege-escalation attempt (Cross-conversation memory write (scope-escape via memory store))."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the privilege-escalation attempt (Cross-conversation memory write (scope-escape via memory store)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - subcategory: "MS.2.6"
       context: >
         Information security — cross-tenant memory writes are integrity
         failures under MS-2.6.
       strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the privilege-escalation attempt (Cross-conversation memory write (scope-escape via memory store))."
+      strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.3 (respond to previously unknown identified risks) is supported by this rule, which surfaces the privilege-escalation attempt (Cross-conversation memory write (scope-escape via memory store)) so the risk can be treated."
+      strength: secondary
 
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the privilege-escalation attempt (Cross-conversation memory write (scope-escape via memory store))."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the privilege-escalation attempt (Cross-conversation memory write (scope-escape via memory store)) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: privilege-escalation
   subcategory: cross-conversation-memory-write

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00001-direct-prompt-injection.yaml

@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Direct Prompt Injection via User Input) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying adversarial input manipulation as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Direct Prompt Injection via User Input)."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing adversarial manipulation risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -62,6 +68,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for adversarial user inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Direct Prompt Injection via User Input)."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00002-indirect-prompt-injection.yaml

@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Indirect injection from third-party content sources is a documented risk category requiring mitigation controls under Article 9 risk management obligations."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Indirect Prompt Injection via External Content) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -61,12 +64,15 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.3.3
       context: "External content providers are third-party components in the AI supply chain; this rule identifies their attack surface as a risk source."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Indirect Prompt Injection via External Content)."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Clause 6.2 AIMS planning requires controls for externally-sourced risks; this rule operationalizes the detection measure for indirect injection via consumed content."
       strength: primary
-    - clause: "8.5"
-      context: "Externally-provided content processed by the agent falls under clause 8.5 control of externally-provided processes; this rule validates that external content does not contain adversarial directives."
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "Externally-provided content processed by the agent falls under clause 8.1 control of externally-provided processes; this rule validates that external content does not contain adversarial directives."
       strength: secondary
 
 tags:

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00003-jailbreak-attempt.yaml

@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Jailbreak attempts constitute a documented risk class in the AI system risk register; Article 9 requires that monitoring controls are deployed to detect these attempts at runtime."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Jailbreak Attempt Detection) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - subcategory: "MP.5.1"
       context: "Jailbreak attempts are a primary class of adversarial input attacks against AI systems; MP.5.1 requires that adversarial input risks are identified and tracked so that runtime detection controls like this rule can be deployed."
@@ -47,12 +50,15 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detected jailbreak patterns represent active exploitation of AI safety mechanisms, triggering the risk treatment response plans required by MG.2.3 to contain and remediate adversarial prompt attacks."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Jailbreak Attempt Detection)."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "ISO 42001 clause 6.2 requires AI risk treatment activities to be planned and implemented; jailbreak detection rules operationalize the risk treatment plan for adversarial prompt-based safety bypass attacks."
       strength: primary
-    - clause: "8.6"
-      context: "Clause 8.6 operational controls ensure AI systems execute correctly and consistently; runtime jailbreak detection enforces that safety constraints remain active despite adversarial instructions to disable them."
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "Clause 8.1 operational controls ensure AI systems execute correctly and consistently; runtime jailbreak detection enforces that safety constraints remain active despite adversarial instructions to disable them."
       strength: secondary
 
 tags:

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00004-system-prompt-override.yaml

@@ -39,6 +39,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Successful system prompt override grants full control over agent behavior, so detection events must trigger the supersede/disengage mechanisms required by MG.2.3 to deactivate or quarantine the affected agent session before downstream unauthorized actions occur."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Attempt)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Attempt) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Attempt)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Attempt)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Attempt) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: system-prompt-override

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00005-multi-turn-injection.yaml

@@ -38,6 +38,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Identification of multi-turn injection patterns triggers risk treatment plans to disengage or interrupt the manipulated conversation before the attacker reaches the escalation payload; MG.2.3 mandates these response mechanisms be in place."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Turn Prompt Injection)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Turn Prompt Injection) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Turn Prompt Injection)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Turn Prompt Injection)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Turn Prompt Injection) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: multi-turn

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00080-encoding-evasion.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -30,6 +32,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of encoded override instructions triggers pre-defined risk treatment plans to block or sanitize the payload before it reaches the model; MG.2.3 mandates these containment mechanisms are in place to disengage malicious flows."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding-Based Prompt Injection Evasion)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding-Based Prompt Injection Evasion) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding-Based Prompt Injection Evasion)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding-Based Prompt Injection Evasion)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding-Based Prompt Injection Evasion) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: encoding-evasion

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00081-semantic-multi-turn.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -33,6 +35,23 @@ compliance:
       context: >-
         On detection of semantic evasion patterns, the system must be able to disengage or quarantine the affected session before the multi-turn payload completes; MG.2.3 mandates that such supersede/deactivate mechanisms are in place for adversarial prompt injection.
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Semantic Evasion via Multi-Turn Prompt Injection)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Semantic Evasion via Multi-Turn Prompt Injection) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Semantic Evasion via Multi-Turn Prompt Injection)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Semantic Evasion via Multi-Turn Prompt Injection)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Semantic Evasion via Multi-Turn Prompt Injection) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: semantic-evasion

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00082-fingerprint-evasion.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -30,6 +32,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of fingerprint evasion patterns triggers risk treatment to deactivate or constrain agents whose behavior signatures cannot be trusted; MG.2.3 requires mechanisms to supersede or disengage AI systems when monitoring assurances are undermined."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Behavioral Fingerprint Detection Evasion)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Behavioral Fingerprint Detection Evasion) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Behavioral Fingerprint Detection Evasion)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Behavioral Fingerprint Detection Evasion)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Behavioral Fingerprint Detection Evasion) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: fingerprint-evasion

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00083-indirect-tool-injection.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -33,6 +35,26 @@ compliance:
       context: >-
         Detection of instruction-override payloads, fake system delimiters, and role-reassignment content in tool outputs must trigger containment so the agent does not execute attacker-controlled actions; MG.2.3 requires these supersede/disengage mechanisms be available on detection.
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Indirect Prompt Injection via Tool Responses)."
+      strength: primary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Indirect Prompt Injection via Tool Responses)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Indirect Prompt Injection via Tool Responses) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Indirect Prompt Injection via Tool Responses)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Indirect Prompt Injection via Tool Responses)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Indirect Prompt Injection via Tool Responses) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: indirect-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00084-structured-data-injection.yaml

@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ references:
   mitre_attack:
     - "T0051"
 
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 
@@ -36,6 +38,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Matches on injection payloads inside structured data fields trigger risk treatment plans to quarantine or sanitize the input before it reaches the model; MG.2.3 requires these response mechanisms be defined and activated on detection."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Data Injection via JSON/CSV Payloads)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Data Injection via JSON/CSV Payloads) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Data Injection via JSON/CSV Payloads)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Data Injection via JSON/CSV Payloads)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Data Injection via JSON/CSV Payloads) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: structured-data-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00085-audit-evasion.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -30,6 +32,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MS.2.6"
       context: "Payloads that manipulate trust scores or claim to have passed audit layers represent active security risk indicators; MS.2.6 requires continuous evaluation of safety/security risk magnitude as these evasion techniques evolve."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Layer Security Audit Evasion)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Layer Security Audit Evasion) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Layer Security Audit Evasion)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Layer Security Audit Evasion)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Multi-Layer Security Audit Evasion) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: audit-evasion

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00086-visual-spoofing.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -30,6 +32,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Matches on visual-spoofing payloads trigger risk treatment plans to quarantine or sanitize disguised inputs before the model acts on them; MG.2.3 mandates pre-defined response mechanisms for adversarial inputs."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Visual Spoofing via RTL Override, Punycode, and Homoglyph Injection)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Visual Spoofing via RTL Override, Punycode, and Homoglyph Injection) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Visual Spoofing via RTL Override, Punycode, and Homoglyph Injection)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Visual Spoofing via RTL Override, Punycode, and Homoglyph Injection)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Visual Spoofing via RTL Override, Punycode, and Homoglyph Injection) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: visual-spoofing

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00087-rule-probing.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -30,6 +32,26 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.4.1"
       context: "Detection of probing behavior feeds post-deployment monitoring under MG.4.1, providing telemetry that filter coverage is being actively reconnoitered and that detection rules require iterative tuning."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.3 (respond to previously unknown identified risks) is supported by this rule, which surfaces the prompt-injection attempt (Detection Rule Probing and Evasion Testing) so the risk can be treated."
+      strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Detection Rule Probing and Evasion Testing)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Detection Rule Probing and Evasion Testing) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Detection Rule Probing and Evasion Testing)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Detection Rule Probing and Evasion Testing)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Detection Rule Probing and Evasion Testing) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: rule-probing

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00088-adaptive-countermeasure.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -30,6 +32,26 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Adversarial instructions to reset baselines or hide anomalies must trigger pre-defined response plans to disengage or contain the agent before monitoring blind spots enable further compromise; MG.2.3 mandates that such supersede/deactivate mechanisms exist."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Adaptive Countermeasure Against Behavioral Monitoring)."
+      strength: primary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Adaptive Countermeasure Against Behavioral Monitoring)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Adaptive Countermeasure Against Behavioral Monitoring) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Adaptive Countermeasure Against Behavioral Monitoring)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Adaptive Countermeasure Against Behavioral Monitoring)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Adaptive Countermeasure Against Behavioral Monitoring) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: monitoring-countermeasure

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00089-polymorphic-skill.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -30,6 +32,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of malicious tool registration or aliased invocation must trigger pre-defined risk treatment to disengage or block the offending capability before execution; MG.2.3 mandates these supersede/deactivate mechanisms be in place."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Polymorphic Skill and Capability Aliasing Attack)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Polymorphic Skill and Capability Aliasing Attack) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Polymorphic Skill and Capability Aliasing Attack)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Polymorphic Skill and Capability Aliasing Attack)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Polymorphic Skill and Capability Aliasing Attack) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: polymorphic-evasion

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00090-threat-intel-exfil.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
   mitre_atlas:
     - AML.T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -30,6 +32,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of rule-enumeration and security-config exfiltration attempts must trigger containment responses before attackers reverse-engineer defenses; MG.2.3 mandates predefined mechanisms to disengage or block the offending session."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Threat Intelligence Exfiltration and Rule Enumeration)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Threat Intelligence Exfiltration and Rule Enumeration) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Threat Intelligence Exfiltration and Rule Enumeration)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Threat Intelligence Exfiltration and Rule Enumeration)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Threat Intelligence Exfiltration and Rule Enumeration) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: intel-exfiltration

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00091-nested-payload.yaml

@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ references:
     - AML.T0051
   mitre_attack:
     - T0051
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
 metadata_provenance:
   owasp_llm: auto-generated
 compliance:
@@ -32,6 +34,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of nested injection payloads triggers containment workflows to disengage or quarantine the offending request before the LLM executes the smuggled instructions; MG.2.3 mandates that these supersede/deactivate mechanisms are defined and activated upon detection."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Advanced Structured Data Injection with Nested Payloads)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Advanced Structured Data Injection with Nested Payloads) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Advanced Structured Data Injection with Nested Payloads)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Advanced Structured Data Injection with Nested Payloads)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Advanced Structured Data Injection with Nested Payloads) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: nested-data-injection