agent-engineering-skills 1.0.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/AGENTS.md +249 -0
- package/LICENSE +21 -0
- package/README.md +113 -0
- package/bin/cli.js +223 -0
- package/docs/agent-integration.md +200 -0
- package/docs/philosophy.md +131 -0
- package/docs/reference-authoring.md +117 -0
- package/docs/skill-authoring.md +126 -0
- package/examples/authorization-bypass.md +191 -0
- package/examples/frontend-review.md +244 -0
- package/examples/race-condition.md +128 -0
- package/examples/xp-reward-loop.md +123 -0
- package/package.json +45 -0
- package/references/engineering.yaml +88 -0
- package/references/frontend.yaml +139 -0
- package/references/product.yaml +54 -0
- package/references/research.yaml +88 -0
- package/references/security.yaml +85 -0
- package/references/ux.yaml +37 -0
- package/scripts/validate.py +454 -0
- package/skills/audit/adversarial-review/SKILL.md +190 -0
- package/skills/audit/business-logic-audit/SKILL.md +182 -0
- package/skills/audit/edge-case-hunter/SKILL.md +159 -0
- package/skills/audit/error-flow-audit/SKILL.md +184 -0
- package/skills/audit/state-consistency-audit/SKILL.md +174 -0
- package/skills/audit/user-flow-audit/SKILL.md +161 -0
- package/skills/frontend/accessibility-review/SKILL.md +186 -0
- package/skills/frontend/animation-review/SKILL.md +171 -0
- package/skills/frontend/interaction-design/SKILL.md +162 -0
- package/skills/frontend/ux-review/SKILL.md +172 -0
- package/skills/frontend/visual-quality-review/SKILL.md +160 -0
- package/skills/meta/research-router/SKILL.md +184 -0
- package/skills/meta/skill-router/SKILL.md +206 -0
- package/skills/product/gamification-audit/SKILL.md +213 -0
- package/skills/reliability/data-integrity-audit/SKILL.md +187 -0
- package/skills/reliability/idempotency-audit/SKILL.md +191 -0
- package/skills/reliability/race-condition-hunter/SKILL.md +181 -0
- package/skills/research/github-reference-research/SKILL.md +197 -0
- package/skills/research/implementation-research/SKILL.md +181 -0
- package/skills/research/market-research/SKILL.md +202 -0
- package/skills/research/reference-research/SKILL.md +186 -0
- package/skills/security/api-abuse-audit/SKILL.md +178 -0
- package/skills/security/authorization-audit/SKILL.md +176 -0
- package/skills/security/input-trust-audit/SKILL.md +178 -0
- package/templates/audit-report.md +89 -0
- package/templates/bug-report.md +107 -0
- package/templates/design-review.md +122 -0
- package/templates/research-report.md +96 -0
package/package.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
{
|
|
2
|
+
"name": "agent-engineering-skills",
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "1.0.0",
|
|
4
|
+
"description": "Modular skills that teach AI agents to audit systems, find bugs, review UX/frontend, and research before reinventing. npx agent-engineering-skills install",
|
|
5
|
+
"license": "MIT",
|
|
6
|
+
"type": "module",
|
|
7
|
+
"bin": {
|
|
8
|
+
"agent-engineering-skills": "./bin/cli.js"
|
|
9
|
+
},
|
|
10
|
+
"files": [
|
|
11
|
+
"bin/",
|
|
12
|
+
"skills/",
|
|
13
|
+
"references/",
|
|
14
|
+
"templates/",
|
|
15
|
+
"examples/",
|
|
16
|
+
"docs/",
|
|
17
|
+
"scripts/",
|
|
18
|
+
"AGENTS.md",
|
|
19
|
+
"README.md",
|
|
20
|
+
"LICENSE"
|
|
21
|
+
],
|
|
22
|
+
"engines": {
|
|
23
|
+
"node": ">=18"
|
|
24
|
+
},
|
|
25
|
+
"keywords": [
|
|
26
|
+
"claude-code",
|
|
27
|
+
"agent",
|
|
28
|
+
"skills",
|
|
29
|
+
"audit",
|
|
30
|
+
"security",
|
|
31
|
+
"frontend",
|
|
32
|
+
"ux",
|
|
33
|
+
"research",
|
|
34
|
+
"bug-finding",
|
|
35
|
+
"ai-agent"
|
|
36
|
+
],
|
|
37
|
+
"repository": {
|
|
38
|
+
"type": "git",
|
|
39
|
+
"url": "git+https://github.com/1arley/1arley-agent-skills.git"
|
|
40
|
+
},
|
|
41
|
+
"bugs": {
|
|
42
|
+
"url": "https://github.com/1arley/1arley-agent-skills/issues"
|
|
43
|
+
},
|
|
44
|
+
"homepage": "https://github.com/1arley/1arley-agent-skills#readme"
|
|
45
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# references/engineering.yaml
|
|
2
|
+
# Catálogo de fontes para engenharia, arquitetura, concorrência, integridade e bugs.
|
|
3
|
+
# Schema: ver docs/reference-authoring.md
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- name: OWASP Cheat Sheet Series
|
|
6
|
+
url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/
|
|
7
|
+
type: methodology
|
|
8
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
9
|
+
authority: established
|
|
10
|
+
use_when:
|
|
11
|
+
- auditing authentication and authorization flows
|
|
12
|
+
- reviewing input validation and injection risks
|
|
13
|
+
- securing session management and error handling
|
|
14
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
15
|
+
- pure frontend visual review
|
|
16
|
+
- tasks with no security-relevant surface
|
|
17
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
18
|
+
- "OWASP cheat sheet authorization"
|
|
19
|
+
- "OWASP input validation"
|
|
20
|
+
- "OWASP race condition concurrency"
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- name: OWASP Top 10
|
|
23
|
+
url: https://owasp.org/Top10/
|
|
24
|
+
type: methodology
|
|
25
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
26
|
+
authority: established
|
|
27
|
+
use_when:
|
|
28
|
+
- classifying security risks in a web application
|
|
29
|
+
- prioritizing which audit skills to run
|
|
30
|
+
- mapping findings to recognized risk categories
|
|
31
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
32
|
+
- mobile-specific or desktop-specific concerns not covered
|
|
33
|
+
- already-classified, narrow single-issue investigations
|
|
34
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
35
|
+
- "OWASP Top 10 broken access control"
|
|
36
|
+
- "OWASP Top 10 identification authentication failures"
|
|
37
|
+
- "OWASP security risk categories"
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
- name: PortSwigger Web Security Academy
|
|
40
|
+
url: https://portswigger.net/web-security
|
|
41
|
+
type: methodology
|
|
42
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
43
|
+
authority: established
|
|
44
|
+
use_when:
|
|
45
|
+
- learning concrete attack patterns for access control and API abuse
|
|
46
|
+
- finding reproducible exploit examples
|
|
47
|
+
- training adversarial-review mental models
|
|
48
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
49
|
+
- non-web targets
|
|
50
|
+
- when a quick checklist suffices
|
|
51
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
52
|
+
- "PortSwigger access control vulnerabilities"
|
|
53
|
+
- "PortSwigger business logic vulnerabilities"
|
|
54
|
+
- "PortSwigger API testing"
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- name: Google Testing Blog
|
|
57
|
+
url: https://testing.googleblog.com/
|
|
58
|
+
type: heuristic
|
|
59
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
60
|
+
authority: established
|
|
61
|
+
use_when:
|
|
62
|
+
- designing edge-case and state-based tests
|
|
63
|
+
- reasoning about concurrency and flakiness
|
|
64
|
+
- evaluating testing strategy for race conditions
|
|
65
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
66
|
+
- frontend visual or UX review
|
|
67
|
+
- operational/infra concerns
|
|
68
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
69
|
+
- "Google testing blog flaky tests"
|
|
70
|
+
- "Google testing blog concurrency"
|
|
71
|
+
- "testing blog state machine testing"
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
- name: GitHub
|
|
74
|
+
url: https://github.com/
|
|
75
|
+
type: implementation
|
|
76
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
77
|
+
authority: community
|
|
78
|
+
use_when:
|
|
79
|
+
- searching for production implementations of a pattern
|
|
80
|
+
- comparing how real projects handle concurrency or idempotency
|
|
81
|
+
- finding test cases for edge conditions
|
|
82
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
83
|
+
- when official documentation exists and is authoritative
|
|
84
|
+
- copying code blindly instead of extracting principles
|
|
85
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
86
|
+
- "<feature> idempotency implementation"
|
|
87
|
+
- "<feature> race condition test"
|
|
88
|
+
- "<feature> transaction integrity"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# references/frontend.yaml
|
|
2
|
+
# Catálogo de fontes para frontend: visual, implementação, animação, acessibilidade.
|
|
3
|
+
# Schema: ver docs/reference-authoring.md
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- name: Impeccable
|
|
6
|
+
url: https://impeccable.style/
|
|
7
|
+
type: heuristic
|
|
8
|
+
category: frontend
|
|
9
|
+
authority: established
|
|
10
|
+
use_when:
|
|
11
|
+
- reviewing visual quality and craft
|
|
12
|
+
- auditing spacing, typography, hierarchy, and density
|
|
13
|
+
- calibrating design taste against a high bar
|
|
14
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
15
|
+
- backend-only tasks
|
|
16
|
+
- when a strict component spec already exists
|
|
17
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
18
|
+
- "impeccable style visual quality"
|
|
19
|
+
- "impeccable spacing typography hierarchy"
|
|
20
|
+
- "impeccable frontend craft"
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- name: Impeccable Slop
|
|
23
|
+
url: https://impeccable.style/slop/
|
|
24
|
+
type: heuristic
|
|
25
|
+
category: frontend
|
|
26
|
+
authority: established
|
|
27
|
+
use_when:
|
|
28
|
+
- detecting AI slop and generic AI visual patterns
|
|
29
|
+
- auditing visual-quality-review findings for templated output
|
|
30
|
+
- training the eye to recognize low-craft generated UI
|
|
31
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
32
|
+
- non-frontend review
|
|
33
|
+
- when evaluating genuinely bespoke design
|
|
34
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
35
|
+
- "impeccable slop AI generated UI patterns"
|
|
36
|
+
- "detect AI slop frontend"
|
|
37
|
+
- "generic AI visual patterns"
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
- name: Interfaces
|
|
40
|
+
url: https://interfaces.rauno.me/
|
|
41
|
+
type: heuristic
|
|
42
|
+
category: frontend
|
|
43
|
+
authority: curated
|
|
44
|
+
use_when:
|
|
45
|
+
- referencing high-craft interaction and visual detail
|
|
46
|
+
- comparing micro-interaction polish
|
|
47
|
+
- seeking non-generic UI reference
|
|
48
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
49
|
+
- copying identity or branding
|
|
50
|
+
- needing prescriptive methodology
|
|
51
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
52
|
+
- "interfaces rauno visual detail"
|
|
53
|
+
- "high craft frontend reference"
|
|
54
|
+
- "interface polish micro-interactions"
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- name: Dribbble
|
|
57
|
+
url: https://dribbble.com/
|
|
58
|
+
type: inspiration
|
|
59
|
+
category: frontend
|
|
60
|
+
authority: curated
|
|
61
|
+
use_when:
|
|
62
|
+
- seeking visual inspiration for composition and style
|
|
63
|
+
- exploring alternative treatments for a screen
|
|
64
|
+
- breaking out of generic patterns
|
|
65
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
66
|
+
- using as evidence for a technical finding
|
|
67
|
+
- copying layouts or branding
|
|
68
|
+
- any decision requiring authority or methodology
|
|
69
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
70
|
+
- "dribbble <screen type> design"
|
|
71
|
+
- "dribbble dashboard composition"
|
|
72
|
+
- "dribbble empty state inspiration"
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
- name: dark.design
|
|
75
|
+
url: https://www.dark.design/
|
|
76
|
+
type: inspiration
|
|
77
|
+
category: frontend
|
|
78
|
+
authority: curated
|
|
79
|
+
use_when:
|
|
80
|
+
- exploring dark-mode and high-contrast visual treatments
|
|
81
|
+
- seeking non-generic aesthetic direction
|
|
82
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
83
|
+
- using as technical evidence
|
|
84
|
+
- light-mode or accessibility-contrast requirements
|
|
85
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
86
|
+
- "dark design dark mode UI"
|
|
87
|
+
- "dark design high contrast inspiration"
|
|
88
|
+
- "dark theme visual reference"
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
- name: Animate UI
|
|
91
|
+
url: https://animate-ui.com/
|
|
92
|
+
type: implementation
|
|
93
|
+
category: frontend
|
|
94
|
+
authority: community
|
|
95
|
+
use_when:
|
|
96
|
+
- implementing or reviewing concrete animation components
|
|
97
|
+
- referencing real transition and motion patterns
|
|
98
|
+
- auditing animation-review findings against working examples
|
|
99
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
100
|
+
- needing animation principles over code
|
|
101
|
+
- when reduced-motion accessibility is the primary concern
|
|
102
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
103
|
+
- "animate ui component animation"
|
|
104
|
+
- "animate ui transition examples"
|
|
105
|
+
- "animate ui motion implementation"
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
- name: LazyWeb
|
|
108
|
+
url: https://www.lazyweb.com/
|
|
109
|
+
type: discovery
|
|
110
|
+
category: frontend
|
|
111
|
+
authority: community
|
|
112
|
+
use_when:
|
|
113
|
+
- discovering more frontend sources and tools
|
|
114
|
+
- finding what the community is using for a given problem
|
|
115
|
+
- expanding the reference set before deep research
|
|
116
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
117
|
+
- when authoritative sources are already identified
|
|
118
|
+
- as primary evidence for a finding
|
|
119
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
120
|
+
- "lazyweb frontend tools"
|
|
121
|
+
- "lazyweb UI libraries"
|
|
122
|
+
- "lazyweb design resources"
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
- name: Shoogle
|
|
125
|
+
url: https://shoogle.dev/
|
|
126
|
+
type: discovery
|
|
127
|
+
category: frontend
|
|
128
|
+
authority: community
|
|
129
|
+
use_when:
|
|
130
|
+
- discovering frontend libraries and components
|
|
131
|
+
- surveying implementation options for a UI need
|
|
132
|
+
- broadening research before committing to an approach
|
|
133
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
134
|
+
- as primary evidence
|
|
135
|
+
- when official docs for a chosen library exist
|
|
136
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
137
|
+
- "shoogle frontend components"
|
|
138
|
+
- "shoogle UI library discovery"
|
|
139
|
+
- "shoogle react components"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# references/product.yaml
|
|
2
|
+
# Catálogo de fontes para produto: regras de negócio, gamificação, comportamento de mercado.
|
|
3
|
+
# Schema: ver docs/reference-authoring.md
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- name: GitHub
|
|
6
|
+
url: https://github.com/
|
|
7
|
+
type: implementation
|
|
8
|
+
category: product
|
|
9
|
+
authority: community
|
|
10
|
+
use_when:
|
|
11
|
+
- comparing how real products implement gamification and reward loops
|
|
12
|
+
- finding production examples of XP, streaks, and achievement systems
|
|
13
|
+
- locating test cases for reward abuse
|
|
14
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
15
|
+
- copying logic blindly
|
|
16
|
+
- when official documentation for a framework's reward primitives exists
|
|
17
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
18
|
+
- "<product> XP reward implementation"
|
|
19
|
+
- "gamification streak system github"
|
|
20
|
+
- "achievement reward loop implementation"
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- name: Product Hunt
|
|
23
|
+
url: https://www.producthunt.com/
|
|
24
|
+
type: discovery
|
|
25
|
+
category: product
|
|
26
|
+
authority: community
|
|
27
|
+
use_when:
|
|
28
|
+
- discovering real products that solved a similar problem
|
|
29
|
+
- surveying how the market approaches a feature
|
|
30
|
+
- feeding market-research before deeper analysis
|
|
31
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
32
|
+
- as primary evidence for a technical finding
|
|
33
|
+
- when authoritative methodology is needed
|
|
34
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
35
|
+
- "product hunt gamification"
|
|
36
|
+
- "product hunt <feature category>"
|
|
37
|
+
- "product hunt reward systems"
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
- name: Reforge
|
|
40
|
+
url: https://reforge.com/resources
|
|
41
|
+
type: methodology
|
|
42
|
+
category: product
|
|
43
|
+
authority: established
|
|
44
|
+
use_when:
|
|
45
|
+
- reasoning about retention loops and engagement mechanics
|
|
46
|
+
- auditing whether a reward system is gamed-resistant by design
|
|
47
|
+
- grounding a gamification-audit in recognized product thinking
|
|
48
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
49
|
+
- pure visual or frontend review
|
|
50
|
+
- tasks unrelated to engagement or business metrics
|
|
51
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
52
|
+
- "Reforge retention loops"
|
|
53
|
+
- "Reforge gamification mechanics"
|
|
54
|
+
- "Reforge engagement systems"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# references/research.yaml
|
|
2
|
+
# Catálogo de fontes para pesquisa: descoberta de referências, implementações e mercado.
|
|
3
|
+
# Schema: ver docs/reference-authoring.md
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- name: GitHub
|
|
6
|
+
url: https://github.com/
|
|
7
|
+
type: implementation
|
|
8
|
+
category: research
|
|
9
|
+
authority: community
|
|
10
|
+
use_when:
|
|
11
|
+
- searching production implementations of a feature or pattern
|
|
12
|
+
- comparing architecture, database, API, and framework choices
|
|
13
|
+
- evaluating activity, quality, tests, docs, adoption, license
|
|
14
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
15
|
+
- when official documentation is more authoritative
|
|
16
|
+
- copying code instead of extracting ideas
|
|
17
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
18
|
+
- "<feature> implementation architecture"
|
|
19
|
+
- "<feature> database schema API"
|
|
20
|
+
- "<feature> framework tests adoption"
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- name: Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
+
url: https://scholar.google.com/
|
|
24
|
+
type: discovery
|
|
25
|
+
category: research
|
|
26
|
+
authority: established
|
|
27
|
+
use_when:
|
|
28
|
+
- finding authoritative technical literature on a hard problem
|
|
29
|
+
- grounding concurrency, integrity, or algorithm decisions in research
|
|
30
|
+
- when uncertainty and impact are both high
|
|
31
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
32
|
+
- routine implementation tasks
|
|
33
|
+
- when practitioner sources already answer the question
|
|
34
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
35
|
+
- "<topic> race condition formal"
|
|
36
|
+
- "<topic> idempotency distributed systems"
|
|
37
|
+
- "<topic> consensus integrity"
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
- name: Hacker News
|
|
40
|
+
url: https://news.ycombinator.com/
|
|
41
|
+
type: discovery
|
|
42
|
+
category: research
|
|
43
|
+
authority: community
|
|
44
|
+
use_when:
|
|
45
|
+
- finding practitioner discussion and post-mortems
|
|
46
|
+
- discovering real-world edge cases and failures
|
|
47
|
+
- surveying community sentiment on a library or approach
|
|
48
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
49
|
+
- as primary technical evidence
|
|
50
|
+
- when authoritative docs exist
|
|
51
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
52
|
+
- "Hacker News <library> experience"
|
|
53
|
+
- "Hacker News <feature> post-mortem"
|
|
54
|
+
- "Hacker News <pattern> pitfalls"
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- name: Stack Overflow
|
|
57
|
+
url: https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
58
|
+
type: heuristic
|
|
59
|
+
category: research
|
|
60
|
+
authority: community
|
|
61
|
+
use_when:
|
|
62
|
+
- finding how practitioners solved a specific technical problem
|
|
63
|
+
- locating known edge cases and gotchas
|
|
64
|
+
- debugging an obscure error during investigation
|
|
65
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
66
|
+
- when official documentation covers the topic
|
|
67
|
+
- as justification for a security finding
|
|
68
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
69
|
+
- "<error message> stack overflow"
|
|
70
|
+
- "<library> <edge case>"
|
|
71
|
+
- "<pattern> concurrency gotcha"
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
- name: DevDocs
|
|
74
|
+
url: https://devdocs.io/
|
|
75
|
+
type: implementation
|
|
76
|
+
category: research
|
|
77
|
+
authority: vendor
|
|
78
|
+
use_when:
|
|
79
|
+
- quickly consulting consolidated official documentation
|
|
80
|
+
- cross-referencing API references across frameworks
|
|
81
|
+
- during implementation-research for canonical signatures
|
|
82
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
83
|
+
- when the vendor's own docs have fuller guides
|
|
84
|
+
- non-documented, behavioral questions
|
|
85
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
86
|
+
- "devdocs <framework> api reference"
|
|
87
|
+
- "devdocs <method> signature"
|
|
88
|
+
- "devdocs <library> documentation"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# references/security.yaml
|
|
2
|
+
# Catálogo de fontes para segurança: autorização, abuso de API, confiança de input.
|
|
3
|
+
# Schema: ver docs/reference-authoring.md
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- name: OWASP Cheat Sheet Series
|
|
6
|
+
url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/
|
|
7
|
+
type: methodology
|
|
8
|
+
category: security
|
|
9
|
+
authority: established
|
|
10
|
+
use_when:
|
|
11
|
+
- auditing authorization and access control
|
|
12
|
+
- reviewing input validation and trust boundaries
|
|
13
|
+
- designing server-side enforcement of permissions
|
|
14
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
15
|
+
- pure UX or visual review
|
|
16
|
+
- non-web security contexts
|
|
17
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
18
|
+
- "OWASP authorization cheat sheet"
|
|
19
|
+
- "OWASP injection prevention"
|
|
20
|
+
- "OWASP server-side validation"
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- name: OWASP Top 10
|
|
23
|
+
url: https://owasp.org/Top10/
|
|
24
|
+
type: methodology
|
|
25
|
+
category: security
|
|
26
|
+
authority: established
|
|
27
|
+
use_when:
|
|
28
|
+
- classifying authorization and input-trust findings
|
|
29
|
+
- prioritizing security skill selection
|
|
30
|
+
- mapping defects to Broken Access Control / Identification & Auth Failures
|
|
31
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
32
|
+
- narrow investigations already scoped to one issue
|
|
33
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
34
|
+
- "OWASP broken access control A01"
|
|
35
|
+
- "OWASP identification authentication A07"
|
|
36
|
+
- "OWASP security by design"
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
- name: PortSwigger Web Security Academy
|
|
39
|
+
url: https://portswigger.net/web-security
|
|
40
|
+
type: methodology
|
|
41
|
+
category: security
|
|
42
|
+
authority: established
|
|
43
|
+
use_when:
|
|
44
|
+
- reproducing access control and API abuse attack patterns
|
|
45
|
+
- learning IDOR and privilege escalation techniques
|
|
46
|
+
- training input-trust adversarial thinking
|
|
47
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
48
|
+
- non-web targets
|
|
49
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
50
|
+
- "PortSwigger access control"
|
|
51
|
+
- "PortSwigger IDOR insecure direct object reference"
|
|
52
|
+
- "PortSwigger API abuse mass assignment"
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
- name: CWE — Common Weakness Enumeration
|
|
55
|
+
url: https://cwe.mitre.org/
|
|
56
|
+
type: heuristic
|
|
57
|
+
category: security
|
|
58
|
+
authority: established
|
|
59
|
+
use_when:
|
|
60
|
+
- naming and classifying a confirmed weakness
|
|
61
|
+
- finding canonical descriptions of input-trust and authorization flaws
|
|
62
|
+
- referencing a finding to a recognized standard
|
|
63
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
64
|
+
- discovery of novel patterns (CWE classifies known ones)
|
|
65
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
66
|
+
- "CWE authorization missing"
|
|
67
|
+
- "CWE improper input validation"
|
|
68
|
+
- "CWE trust boundary violation"
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
- name: GitHub
|
|
71
|
+
url: https://github.com/
|
|
72
|
+
type: implementation
|
|
73
|
+
category: security
|
|
74
|
+
authority: community
|
|
75
|
+
use_when:
|
|
76
|
+
- finding real-world examples of authorization middleware
|
|
77
|
+
- comparing how projects enforce ownership and roles server-side
|
|
78
|
+
- locating test suites for access control
|
|
79
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
80
|
+
- when official guidance is more authoritative
|
|
81
|
+
- copying middleware blindly without adapting to the project's model
|
|
82
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
83
|
+
- "<framework> authorization middleware"
|
|
84
|
+
- "<framework> role based access control implementation"
|
|
85
|
+
- "<feature> ownership check server side"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# references/ux.yaml
|
|
2
|
+
# Catálogo de fontes para UX: usabilidade, heurísticas, fluxos, carga cognitiva.
|
|
3
|
+
# Schema: ver docs/reference-authoring.md
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- name: Laws of UX
|
|
6
|
+
url: https://lawsofux.com/
|
|
7
|
+
type: methodology
|
|
8
|
+
category: ux
|
|
9
|
+
authority: established
|
|
10
|
+
use_when:
|
|
11
|
+
- reviewing usability and cognitive load
|
|
12
|
+
- designing or auditing user flows
|
|
13
|
+
- justifying a UX decision with a recognized principle
|
|
14
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
15
|
+
- pure visual or aesthetic review
|
|
16
|
+
- backend-only tasks
|
|
17
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
18
|
+
- "Laws of UX heuristics"
|
|
19
|
+
- "Laws of UX cognitive load"
|
|
20
|
+
- "Laws of UX Hick's law Fitts's law"
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- name: Interfaces
|
|
23
|
+
url: https://interfaces.rauno.me/
|
|
24
|
+
type: heuristic
|
|
25
|
+
category: ux
|
|
26
|
+
authority: curated
|
|
27
|
+
use_when:
|
|
28
|
+
- calibrating taste for interaction detail and feedback
|
|
29
|
+
- comparing affordances and micro-interactions
|
|
30
|
+
- seeking reference for high-craft interface patterns
|
|
31
|
+
avoid_when:
|
|
32
|
+
- needing authoritative methodology
|
|
33
|
+
- copying visual identity
|
|
34
|
+
search_queries:
|
|
35
|
+
- "interfaces rauno interaction detail"
|
|
36
|
+
- "high craft UI affordances"
|
|
37
|
+
- "interface micro-interactions reference"
|