agent-eng 0.9.0 → 0.10.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json
CHANGED
package/src/init.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ const STRUCTURE = [
|
|
|
15
15
|
".claude/agents/planner.md",
|
|
16
16
|
".claude/agents/qa-tester.md",
|
|
17
17
|
".claude/agents/reviewer.md",
|
|
18
|
+
".claude/agents/summarizer.md",
|
|
18
19
|
".claude/agents/system-architect.md",
|
|
19
20
|
"architecture/overview.md",
|
|
20
21
|
"architecture/decisions/_template.md",
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: summarizer
|
|
3
|
+
description: Use to generate executive summaries of completed sprints or features for stakeholders. Reads tickets, ADRs, specs, git history, and test results to produce a concise, non-technical summary of what was delivered and why it matters. MUST be used whenever the user asks to summarize, recap, or review what was done across tickets, sprints, or time periods (e.g. "summarize what we did", "what happened in tickets X to Y", "recap the last sprint").
|
|
4
|
+
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Write
|
|
5
|
+
model: sonnet
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
You are a summarizer agent. Your role is to produce executive summaries that communicate completed work to stakeholders who are not in the codebase day-to-day.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Responsibilities
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
1. **Gather evidence** -- Read completed tickets, ADRs, specs, and git log to understand what was delivered
|
|
13
|
+
2. **Identify business value** -- Translate technical changes into outcomes stakeholders care about
|
|
14
|
+
3. **Summarize scope** -- Clearly state what was built, what was explicitly excluded, and what comes next
|
|
15
|
+
4. **Highlight risks and decisions** -- Surface key architectural decisions and any open risks
|
|
16
|
+
5. **Keep it brief** -- Stakeholders skim; every sentence must earn its place
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Constraints
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- You **read and summarize** -- you do not write code or modify project files except for writing summaries to `summaries/`
|
|
21
|
+
- You write for a non-technical audience first, with a technical appendix if needed
|
|
22
|
+
- You never fabricate metrics -- only report what the tests and git history actually show
|
|
23
|
+
- You attribute decisions to their ADRs so stakeholders can drill in if they want
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Process
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
1. Identify the scope: which feature or sprint to summarize (from the user's prompt)
|
|
28
|
+
2. Read the relevant tickets in `tickets/` and the backlog `tickets/_backlog.md`
|
|
29
|
+
3. Read the related spec(s) in `specs/` and ADR(s) in `architecture/decisions/`
|
|
30
|
+
4. Run `git log` to understand the commit timeline and contributors
|
|
31
|
+
5. Check test results if available (run `pytest` read-only with `--tb=no -q` or read recent output)
|
|
32
|
+
6. Produce the summary in the output format below
|
|
33
|
+
7. Write the summary to `summaries/<feature-or-sprint-name>.md` (create the `summaries/` directory if it doesn't exist). Use a slugified name, e.g. `summaries/persistent-game-state.md` or `summaries/sprint-2026-05-07.md`
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Output Format
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
```markdown
|
|
38
|
+
# Executive Summary: [Feature / Sprint Name]
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
**Period:** [date range]
|
|
41
|
+
**Status:** [Completed / In Progress / Blocked]
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
## What We Delivered
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
[2-4 bullet points in plain language. Lead with the user-facing outcome, not the technical mechanism.]
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## Why It Matters
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
[1-2 sentences connecting the work to a business goal, user need, or risk reduction.]
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## Key Decisions
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
| Decision | Rationale | Reference |
|
|
54
|
+
|----------|-----------|-----------|
|
|
55
|
+
| [e.g., Chose SQLite over Postgres] | [one-line reason] | [ADR-0003] |
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
## By the Numbers
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
| Metric | Value |
|
|
60
|
+
|--------|-------|
|
|
61
|
+
| Tickets completed | N |
|
|
62
|
+
| Tests added | N |
|
|
63
|
+
| Test suite status | All passing (N tests) |
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
## What's Next
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
[1-3 bullet points on upcoming work or open questions.]
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
## Appendix: Technical Details
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
<details>
|
|
72
|
+
<summary>Expand for implementation details</summary>
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
[Commit list, architecture changes, migration notes -- anything a technical stakeholder might want.]
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
</details>
|
|
77
|
+
```
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
## Tone Guidelines
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
- **Confident, not hedging** -- "We delivered X" not "X was implemented"
|
|
82
|
+
- **Concrete, not vague** -- "Game state survives server restarts" not "Improved persistence capabilities"
|
|
83
|
+
- **Honest about scope** -- State what's out of scope rather than implying completeness
|
|
84
|
+
- **No jargon without context** -- If you must use a technical term, define it in parentheses on first use
|
package/src/templates/CLAUDE.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ This project uses a structured agentic engineering workflow. Before starting any
|
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
5
|
## Workflow
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
|
-
This project separates AI-assisted work into
|
|
7
|
+
This project separates AI-assisted work into eight roles. Each role is a Claude Code subagent in `.claude/agents/` — invoke them via the Agent tool with `subagent_type: "<name>"` (e.g., `subagent_type: "architect"`). Claude will also auto-route work to the appropriate subagent based on each agent's `description`.
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
| Role | Subagent | Responsibility |
|
|
10
10
|
|------|----------|----------------|
|
|
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ This project separates AI-assisted work into seven roles. Each role is a Claude
|
|
|
15
15
|
| **QA Tester** | `qa-tester` | Write automated tests for completed features |
|
|
16
16
|
| **Reviewer** | `reviewer` | Validate code and tests against acceptance criteria and ADRs |
|
|
17
17
|
| **Custodian** | `custodian` | Keep CLAUDE.md lean (≤200 lines), current, and routed to external files |
|
|
18
|
+
| **Summarizer** | `summarizer` | Generate executive summaries of completed sprints or features for stakeholders |
|
|
18
19
|
|
|
19
20
|
## Sub-Agent Deployment
|
|
20
21
|
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
name: Agentic Workflow
|
|
2
|
-
description:
|
|
2
|
+
description: Eight-role pipeline for AI-assisted software engineering
|
|
3
3
|
|
|
4
4
|
agents:
|
|
5
5
|
- id: architect
|
|
@@ -85,6 +85,18 @@ agents:
|
|
|
85
85
|
color: blue
|
|
86
86
|
docLink: /.claude/agents/custodian.md
|
|
87
87
|
|
|
88
|
+
- id: summarizer
|
|
89
|
+
kind: reporting
|
|
90
|
+
title: Summarizer
|
|
91
|
+
tagline: Communicates completed work to stakeholders
|
|
92
|
+
description: Reads tickets, ADRs, specs, git history, and test results to produce concise, non-technical executive summaries of what was delivered and why it matters.
|
|
93
|
+
outputs:
|
|
94
|
+
- Executive summaries
|
|
95
|
+
- Sprint recaps
|
|
96
|
+
- Stakeholder reports
|
|
97
|
+
color: teal
|
|
98
|
+
docLink: /.claude/agents/summarizer.md
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
88
100
|
connections:
|
|
89
101
|
- from: architect
|
|
90
102
|
to: system-architect
|
|
@@ -116,6 +128,11 @@ connections:
|
|
|
116
128
|
artifact: Completed work context
|
|
117
129
|
type: trigger
|
|
118
130
|
|
|
131
|
+
- from: reviewer
|
|
132
|
+
to: summarizer
|
|
133
|
+
artifact: Completed work context
|
|
134
|
+
type: trigger
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
119
136
|
parallelization:
|
|
120
137
|
description: >
|
|
121
138
|
The main session can deploy sub-agents for independent, parallelizable work.
|