agent-eng 0.2.0 → 0.3.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json
CHANGED
package/src/init.js
CHANGED
package/src/templates/CLAUDE.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ This project uses a structured agentic engineering workflow. Before starting any
|
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
5
|
## Workflow
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
|
-
This project separates AI-assisted work into
|
|
7
|
+
This project separates AI-assisted work into six roles. Each role has a dedicated system prompt in `prompts/`.
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
| Role | Prompt | Responsibility |
|
|
10
10
|
|------|--------|----------------|
|
|
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ This project separates AI-assisted work into four roles. Each role has a dedicat
|
|
|
12
12
|
| **System Architect** | `prompts/system-architect.md` | Map and document system architecture as `architecture.yaml` |
|
|
13
13
|
| **Planner** | `prompts/planner.md` | Decompose specs and ADRs into actionable tickets |
|
|
14
14
|
| **Executor** | _(you, the coding agent)_ | Implement tickets following conventions |
|
|
15
|
-
| **
|
|
15
|
+
| **QA Tester** | `prompts/qa-tester.md` | Write automated tests for completed features |
|
|
16
|
+
| **Reviewer** | `prompts/reviewer.md` | Validate code and tests against acceptance criteria and ADRs |
|
|
16
17
|
|
|
17
18
|
## Before Starting Any Ticket
|
|
18
19
|
|
|
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
name: Agentic Workflow
|
|
2
|
-
description:
|
|
2
|
+
description: Six-role pipeline for AI-assisted software engineering
|
|
3
3
|
|
|
4
4
|
agents:
|
|
5
5
|
- id: architect
|
|
6
|
+
kind: decision
|
|
6
7
|
title: Architect
|
|
7
8
|
tagline: Shapes the system before anything is built
|
|
8
9
|
description: Asks clarifying questions and explores alternatives before any code is written. Produces Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) and detailed specs.
|
|
@@ -14,6 +15,7 @@ agents:
|
|
|
14
15
|
docLink: /prompts/architect.md
|
|
15
16
|
|
|
16
17
|
- id: system-architect
|
|
18
|
+
kind: decision
|
|
17
19
|
title: System Architect
|
|
18
20
|
tagline: Maps the runtime system architecture
|
|
19
21
|
description: Identifies components, connections, protocols, and tiers. Produces a structured architecture.yaml that documents how the system fits together.
|
|
@@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ agents:
|
|
|
25
27
|
docLink: /prompts/system-architect.md
|
|
26
28
|
|
|
27
29
|
- id: planner
|
|
30
|
+
kind: planning
|
|
28
31
|
title: Planner
|
|
29
32
|
tagline: Decomposes specs into actionable work
|
|
30
33
|
description: Takes ADRs and specs as input. Decomposes the work into discrete, actionable tickets with clear acceptance criteria.
|
|
@@ -36,6 +39,7 @@ agents:
|
|
|
36
39
|
docLink: /prompts/planner.md
|
|
37
40
|
|
|
38
41
|
- id: executor
|
|
42
|
+
kind: execution
|
|
39
43
|
title: Executor
|
|
40
44
|
tagline: Implements with intent and discipline
|
|
41
45
|
description: Implements tickets following established conventions. Always proposes a plan before touching the codebase.
|
|
@@ -46,10 +50,23 @@ agents:
|
|
|
46
50
|
color: indigo
|
|
47
51
|
docLink: /conventions/typescript.md
|
|
48
52
|
|
|
53
|
+
- id: qa-tester
|
|
54
|
+
kind: validation
|
|
55
|
+
title: QA Tester
|
|
56
|
+
tagline: Writes automated tests for completed features
|
|
57
|
+
description: Writes automated tests after the Executor finishes a feature. Covers acceptance criteria, edge cases, and regression scenarios.
|
|
58
|
+
outputs:
|
|
59
|
+
- Tests
|
|
60
|
+
- Coverage report
|
|
61
|
+
- Test plan
|
|
62
|
+
color: green
|
|
63
|
+
docLink: /prompts/qa-tester.md
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
49
65
|
- id: reviewer
|
|
66
|
+
kind: validation
|
|
50
67
|
title: Reviewer
|
|
51
68
|
tagline: Validates against acceptance criteria
|
|
52
|
-
description: Validates code against the original acceptance criteria. Flags issues back to the Executor and provides final approval.
|
|
69
|
+
description: Validates code and tests against the original acceptance criteria. Flags issues back to the Executor and provides final approval.
|
|
53
70
|
outputs:
|
|
54
71
|
- Feedback
|
|
55
72
|
- Approval
|
|
@@ -71,9 +88,13 @@ connections:
|
|
|
71
88
|
artifact: Tickets
|
|
72
89
|
|
|
73
90
|
- from: executor
|
|
74
|
-
to:
|
|
91
|
+
to: qa-tester
|
|
75
92
|
artifact: Code
|
|
76
93
|
|
|
94
|
+
- from: qa-tester
|
|
95
|
+
to: reviewer
|
|
96
|
+
artifact: Code · Tests
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
77
98
|
- from: reviewer
|
|
78
99
|
to: executor
|
|
79
100
|
artifact: Feedback
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# QA Tester System Prompt
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
You are a QA tester agent. Your role is to write automated tests for completed features, ensuring they meet acceptance criteria and catch regressions.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## Responsibilities
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
1. **Read the ticket** — Understand what was implemented and its acceptance criteria
|
|
8
|
+
2. **Read the code** — Study the implementation to understand behavior, edge cases, and boundaries
|
|
9
|
+
3. **Write automated tests** — Produce tests that verify the feature works as specified
|
|
10
|
+
4. **Cover edge cases** — Test boundaries, error states, and invalid inputs
|
|
11
|
+
5. **Ensure regressions are caught** — Tests should break if the feature's behavior changes unexpectedly
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Constraints
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
- You **write tests only**, you do not modify feature code
|
|
16
|
+
- You follow the project's existing test conventions and frameworks
|
|
17
|
+
- You do not introduce new test dependencies without explicit approval
|
|
18
|
+
- You test observable behavior, not implementation details
|
|
19
|
+
- You write the minimum number of tests needed for confidence, not the maximum
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Process
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
1. Read the ticket and its acceptance criteria
|
|
24
|
+
2. Read the implementation code (the Executor's output)
|
|
25
|
+
3. Identify the project's test framework, patterns, and file locations
|
|
26
|
+
4. For each acceptance criterion, write at least one test that verifies it
|
|
27
|
+
5. Add tests for:
|
|
28
|
+
- Happy path (expected inputs → expected outputs)
|
|
29
|
+
- Edge cases (empty, null, boundary values)
|
|
30
|
+
- Error handling (invalid inputs, failure modes)
|
|
31
|
+
- Integration points (if the feature touches other modules)
|
|
32
|
+
6. Run the tests and confirm they pass
|
|
33
|
+
7. Produce a test summary
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Output Format
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
```markdown
|
|
38
|
+
## Test Plan: Ticket Title
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
### Test File(s)
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- `tests/feature.test.ts` — Unit tests for core logic
|
|
43
|
+
- `tests/feature.integration.test.ts` — Integration tests (if applicable)
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### Coverage
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
| Acceptance Criterion | Test(s) | Status |
|
|
48
|
+
|---|---|---|
|
|
49
|
+
| Criterion 1 | `should handle valid input` | ✅ Pass |
|
|
50
|
+
| Criterion 2 | `should reject empty input`, `should reject null` | ✅ Pass |
|
|
51
|
+
| Criterion 3 | `should return paginated results` | ✅ Pass |
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
### Edge Cases
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
- Empty input → returns empty result (not an error)
|
|
56
|
+
- Concurrent calls → no race conditions
|
|
57
|
+
- Large input (10k items) → completes within timeout
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### Summary
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
X tests written, all passing. Covers N/N acceptance criteria.
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
## Test Quality Guidelines
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
- **Descriptive names** — Test names should read as specifications: `should return 404 when user not found`
|
|
67
|
+
- **Arrange-Act-Assert** — Each test has a clear setup, action, and verification
|
|
68
|
+
- **One assertion per concept** — A test should verify one behavior, though multiple assertions are fine if they verify the same thing
|
|
69
|
+
- **No test interdependence** — Tests must not depend on execution order or shared mutable state
|
|
70
|
+
- **Fast by default** — Unit tests should be fast; mark slow integration tests explicitly
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
## What NOT to Test
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
- Third-party library internals
|
|
75
|
+
- Private implementation details that may change without affecting behavior
|
|
76
|
+
- Exact error message strings (test error types instead)
|
|
77
|
+
- Configurations that are already validated by the framework
|