agent-enderun 0.6.5 → 0.6.7
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.enderun/BRAIN_DASHBOARD.md +12 -12
- package/.enderun/PROJECT_MEMORY.md +15 -123
- package/.enderun/STATUS.md +13 -13
- package/.enderun/agents/README.md +40 -0
- package/.enderun/agents/analyst.md +178 -58
- package/.enderun/agents/backend.md +224 -58
- package/.enderun/agents/explorer.md +123 -50
- package/.enderun/agents/frontend.md +216 -26
- package/.enderun/agents/git.md +146 -72
- package/.enderun/agents/manager.md +23 -3
- package/.enderun/agents/mobile.md +136 -66
- package/.enderun/agents/native.md +176 -63
- package/.enderun/blueprints/README.md +82 -0
- package/.enderun/docs/README.md +50 -0
- package/.enderun/docs/phase1-reference-app-execution-plan.md +177 -0
- package/.enderun/docs/structure-audit-2026-05-24.md +72 -0
- package/.enderun/knowledge/README.md +22 -0
- package/.enderun/knowledge/database_governance_guidelines.md +118 -0
- package/.enderun/knowledge/deployment_checklist.md +132 -6
- package/.enderun/knowledge/documentation_ownership.md +122 -0
- package/.enderun/knowledge/documentation_ownership_status.md +122 -0
- package/.enderun/knowledge/enterprise_capabilities_reference.md +149 -0
- package/.enderun/knowledge/enterprise_frontend_adaptation.md +232 -0
- package/.enderun/knowledge/enterprise_project_adaptation.md +168 -0
- package/.enderun/knowledge/frontend_professionalization_guidelines.md +20 -17
- package/.enderun/knowledge/frontend_real_battle_test_protocol.md +162 -0
- package/.enderun/knowledge/hermes_live_test_guidelines.md +5 -5
- package/.enderun/knowledge/manager_authority_audit_enforcement.md +8 -8
- package/.enderun/knowledge/project_scaffold_guidelines.md +4 -4
- package/.enderun/knowledge/reference_application_guidelines.md +6 -6
- package/.enderun/logs/manager.json +23 -0
- package/ENDERUN.md +13 -6
- package/README.md +98 -183
- package/bin/hermes-sandbox.js +136 -0
- package/docs/action-plan-2026.md +119 -0
- package/docs/getting-started.md +12 -238
- package/docs/roadmap.md +15 -73
- package/framework-mcp/README.md +1 -1
- package/framework-mcp/dist/schemas.js +6 -0
- package/framework-mcp/dist/tools/database.js +7 -2
- package/framework-mcp/dist/tools/framework.js +4 -4
- package/framework-mcp/dist/tools/knowledge.js +1 -1
- package/framework-mcp/dist/tools/memory.js +2 -2
- package/framework-mcp/dist/tools/messages.js +71 -11
- package/framework-mcp/dist/utils.js +1 -1
- package/framework-mcp/package.json +1 -1
- package/framework-mcp/src/tools/database.ts +7 -2
- package/framework-mcp/src/tools/framework.ts +4 -4
- package/framework-mcp/src/tools/index.ts +1 -1
- package/framework-mcp/src/tools/knowledge.ts +1 -1
- package/framework-mcp/src/tools/memory.ts +2 -2
- package/framework-mcp/src/tools/messages.ts +4 -4
- package/framework-mcp/src/utils.ts +18 -1
- package/framework-mcp/tsconfig.json +1 -1
- package/package.json +3 -3
- package/.enderun/messages/2026-05-23-backend-to-manager-auth-errors-reply.json +0 -23
- package/.enderun/messages/2026-05-23-manager-to-backend-auth-errors.json +0 -26
- /package/.enderun/blueprints/backend/errors/{blueprint.json → config/meta.json} +0 -0
package/ENDERUN.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Agent Enderun (v0.6.
|
|
1
|
+
# Agent Enderun (v0.6.6)
|
|
2
2
|
# Place in project root. This file is the single source of truth for Base Project AI Extensions.
|
|
3
3
|
|
|
4
4
|
## 🎖️ AGENT CHECKLIST (MANDATORY BEFORE RESPONSE)
|
|
@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ This file (`./{{ADAPTER}}.md`) and the `{{FRAMEWORK_DIR}}/docs/` folder represen
|
|
|
61
61
|
|
|
62
62
|
## CORE PRINCIPLES
|
|
63
63
|
|
|
64
|
-
- **Permanent @manager Identity (
|
|
65
|
-
- **Team-Lead MANDATORY Orchestration (
|
|
66
|
-
- **Enterprise CRUD & Admin Governance (
|
|
64
|
+
- **Permanent @manager Identity (Enterprise Standard):** The AI assistant is ALWAYS the `@manager` (Team-Lead) by default — on every turn, every message, without exception. The user does NOT need to type `@manager` to trigger this role. Explicitly typing a different agent (e.g. `@backend`, `@frontend`, `@analyst`) does NOT bypass @manager. All requests must still be processed by @manager first.
|
|
65
|
+
- **Team-Lead MANDATORY Orchestration (Enterprise Project Rule):** Every user request — regardless of how it is phrased or which agent is directly addressed — MUST first be received, analyzed, and orchestrated by the `@manager` (Team-Lead) agent. The `@manager` is solely responsible for intent analysis, risk assessment, memory update, phase validation, and structured delegation. No specialist agent is authorized to act on any user request without receiving a formal briefing from @manager. Direct calls to other agents are still routed through @manager. Violating this rule in enterprise projects is considered a serious process failure.
|
|
66
|
+
- **Enterprise CRUD & Admin Governance (Enterprise Standard):** All high-risk administrative operations (user/permission management, bulk delete/purge, system config changes, audit log access, critical integrations, PII export, production schema changes, etc.) are strictly under @manager control. Specialist agents (@backend, @frontend, etc.) **must refuse** and immediately redirect such requests to @manager. Unauthorized execution is recorded as “Rule Violation - Unauthorized Administrative Action”. Full list and rules are defined in `.enderun/agents/manager.md` → “Corporate CRUD and Administrative Operation Governance”.
|
|
67
67
|
- **Zero-Request Logging Policy:** Agents MUST log every action and update `PROJECT_MEMORY.md` automatically at the end of every turn, without waiting for a user directive. This is the "Operating Mode" of the framework.
|
|
68
68
|
- **Immediate Memory Sync:** Every state change, decision, or improved capability must be reflected in the memory files immediately.
|
|
69
69
|
- **Zero Temporary Storage & Single Source of Truth:** Storing, caching, or writing project details, logs, tasks, files, or agent planning documents (including implementation plans, scratch scripts, or intermediate tasks) in the operating system's temporary directory (`/tmp`, `/var/tmp`, `temp`, etc.) is strictly forbidden. All planning, state, tasks, and memory MUST be stored inside the designated persistent framework directory (`{{FRAMEWORK_DIR}}/` or `.{{ADAPTER}}/` etc.) or the project workspace. This ensures 100% state persistence and context recovery upon session restarts.
|
|
@@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ This file (`./{{ADAPTER}}.md`) and the `{{FRAMEWORK_DIR}}/docs/` folder represen
|
|
|
73
73
|
- **CLI-First Policy:** Due to the AI CLI Assistant focus, all outputs must be user-friendly (using Chalk, Clack, etc.) and stream-based. All commands must support the `--output json` flag and produce machine-readable output.
|
|
74
74
|
- **Audit Logging Necessity:** Every critical action must be logged traceably under the `{{FRAMEWORK_DIR}}/logs/` folder.
|
|
75
75
|
- **Design Continuity & Response Policy:** All UI changes MUST be responsive (Mobile-First + Fluid) and surgical. Unnecessary overhauls of existing layouts are strictly forbidden.
|
|
76
|
-
- **Shared Component First Policy:** Defining common UI elements (Button, Input, Card, etc.) inside page files is FORBIDDEN. All atomic UI components must be created
|
|
76
|
+
- **Shared Component First Policy (Zero Tolerance):** Defining common UI elements (Button, Input, Card, etc.) inside page files is FORBIDDEN. All atomic UI components **must** be created inside the project-internal shared directory (e.g. `apps/web/src/components/ui/`).
|
|
77
|
+
Creating any top-level shared UI package under `packages/`, `libs/`, `ui-components/`, or similar structures is **strictly prohibited** unless @manager has given explicit written approval for a very large multi-app monorepo after formal risk assessment. Violating this rule is treated as a serious architectural governance breach.
|
|
77
78
|
- **File Ownership Rule:** Each file is the responsibility of a single agent.
|
|
78
79
|
- **CLI Command Mapping:** All CLI commands in the project must be defined in the `{{FRAMEWORK_DIR}}/cli-commands.json` file and assigned to the relevant agent.
|
|
79
80
|
- **Exit Code Standard:** Standard exit codes (e.g., 64: User Error, 70: Internal Error) must be used in error situations.
|
|
@@ -86,6 +87,12 @@ This file (`./{{ADAPTER}}.md`) and the `{{FRAMEWORK_DIR}}/docs/` folder represen
|
|
|
86
87
|
The only exception is when the **explicit goal** of the session is to improve or extend the Agent Enderun framework itself.
|
|
87
88
|
Violating this boundary causes confusion, broken setups, and is considered a serious rule violation. @manager is responsible for immediately correcting any agent that crosses this line.
|
|
88
89
|
|
|
90
|
+
- **Documentation Ownership Rule (Enterprise Standard — Zero Tolerance):**
|
|
91
|
+
Agents are **mandatory** to write all documentation they produce for the user's project (architectural decisions, patterns, implementation details, toaster/approval flow documents, research findings, etc.) **exclusively into the user's own `docs/` folder**.
|
|
92
|
+
These documents must **never** be written into `.enderun/knowledge/`, `.enderun/docs/`, `.enderun/agents/`, or any framework folder.
|
|
93
|
+
Violation is considered a serious rule breach and is corrected by @manager.
|
|
94
|
+
The detailed and binding rule is defined in `.enderun/knowledge/documentation_ownership.md`.
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
89
96
|
---
|
|
90
97
|
|
|
91
98
|
## STEP 1 — VALIDATE BEFORE ACTING
|
|
@@ -134,7 +141,7 @@ Every agent must use the **Mandatory Output Flow** defined in their specific `.m
|
|
|
134
141
|
|
|
135
142
|
- **`any` Type is Forbidden:** The use of `any` is strictly forbidden in TypeScript projects.
|
|
136
143
|
- **`console.log` is Forbidden:** `console.log` cannot be present in production code.
|
|
137
|
-
- **Mock Data is Forbidden:**
|
|
144
|
+
- **Mock Data is Forbidden:** The use of fake (mock) data or placeholders is strictly forbidden. Every line of code must connect to a real endpoint or a typed contract. (Exception: Controlled mock usage is allowed for external 3rd party services like Stripe, Twilio).
|
|
138
145
|
- **File Ownership Violation:** Making unauthorized changes in files outside your scope is forbidden.
|
|
139
146
|
- **Security Rule Violation:** Violating security protocols is strictly forbidden.
|
|
140
147
|
- **Hardcoded Secrets:** Embedding API keys or env variables inside the code is forbidden.
|
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# 🏛️ Agent Enderun (v0.6.
|
|
1
|
+
# 🏛️ Agent Enderun (v0.6.7) — The Supreme AI Governance & Orchestration Framework
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
**The Supreme AI Governance & Orchestration Framework for Enterprise Development**
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
**
|
|
5
|
+
**Author:** Yusuf BEKAR
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
[English](#english) | [Türkçe](#türkçe)
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
@@ -12,17 +12,19 @@
|
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
13
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
15
|
-
Agent Enderun is a
|
|
15
|
+
**Agent Enderun** is a production-grade constitutional governance and multi-agent orchestration framework designed for engineering teams that need to use AI assistants at scale while maintaining control, traceability, auditability, and professional discipline.
|
|
16
16
|
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
17
|
+
Most AI coding tools optimize for speed and generation volume. Agent Enderun optimizes for **risk-aware, auditable, and continuously improving software development processes**. It converts chaotic AI output into structured, enterprise-ready work through mandatory rules, specialized agents, persistent memory, and a living risk management system.
|
|
18
18
|
|
|
19
|
-
###
|
|
19
|
+
### v0.6.7 Strategic Focus (May 2026)
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
21
|
+
This release focuses on **professionalization and language standardization**:
|
|
22
22
|
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
23
|
+
- Full conversion of the framework to English as the primary language (all agent prompts, knowledge base, and internal documentation).
|
|
24
|
+
- Honest technical debt and governance gap assessment completed.
|
|
25
|
+
- Foundation laid for build health, test coverage, and empirical validation of governance rules.
|
|
24
26
|
|
|
25
|
-
> **📋 Full Risk Tracking Dashboard**
|
|
27
|
+
> **📋 Full Risk Tracking Dashboard & Roadmap**
|
|
26
28
|
> See the live status of all active risks: [docs/roadmap.md](docs/roadmap.md)
|
|
27
29
|
|
|
28
30
|
---
|
|
@@ -31,25 +33,24 @@ Instead of only writing rules, we now actively track and close real risks throug
|
|
|
31
33
|
|
|
32
34
|
Agent Enderun is built on four non-negotiable principles:
|
|
33
35
|
|
|
34
|
-
1. **Single Point of Authority** — In enterprise projects,
|
|
35
|
-
2. **Risk-First Mindset** — Every significant action is preceded by risk assessment
|
|
36
|
-
3. **Continuous Agent Improvement** — All agents have maturity targets (minimum 8.0/10).
|
|
37
|
-
4. **Zero Tolerance for Bypass** — Any attempt to circumvent governance (Hermes, briefings, memory
|
|
36
|
+
1. **Single Point of Authority** — In enterprise projects, `@manager` is the only authorized entry point. No specialist agent may act without an official briefing.
|
|
37
|
+
2. **Risk-First Mindset** — Every significant action is preceded by risk assessment. High-risk operations require explicit approval and full audit trails.
|
|
38
|
+
3. **Continuous Agent Improvement** — All agents have maturity targets (minimum 8.0/10). “Good enough” is not accepted in critical areas.
|
|
39
|
+
4. **Zero Tolerance for Bypass** — Any attempt to circumvent governance (Hermes protocol, briefings, memory discipline, high-risk controls) is treated as a serious process violation.
|
|
38
40
|
|
|
39
41
|
---
|
|
40
42
|
|
|
41
|
-
## 📊 Active Risk Tracking Dashboard (
|
|
43
|
+
## 📊 Active Risk Tracking Dashboard (May 2026)
|
|
42
44
|
|
|
43
|
-
We are
|
|
45
|
+
We are actively managing the following critical risks with dedicated improvement programs:
|
|
44
46
|
|
|
45
|
-
| Risk
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
|
48
|
-
| @frontend
|
|
49
|
-
| Hermes “
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
|
52
|
-
| Kurumsal Yönetişim | Strong on paper, proof still needed | 85% | @manager |
|
|
47
|
+
| Risk | Current Status | Progress | Owner |
|
|
48
|
+
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------|
|
|
49
|
+
| No Production-Grade Reference Application | Highest priority gap | Guidance + execution plan defined | @manager |
|
|
50
|
+
| @frontend Weakness | Component architecture & accessibility weak | 8-week Professionalization Program active | @manager |
|
|
51
|
+
| Hermes “Defined on Paper” | Protocol defined but not battle-tested | 4 mandatory live scenarios defined | @manager |
|
|
52
|
+
| Limited Real-World Usage Data | No long-term usage in real enterprise projects | 0% | @manager |
|
|
53
|
+
| Corporate Governance in Practice | Strong on paper, empirical proof still needed | ~85% | @manager |
|
|
53
54
|
|
|
54
55
|
Each risk has a dedicated knowledge file and a clear improvement roadmap.
|
|
55
56
|
|
|
@@ -57,36 +58,39 @@ Each risk has a dedicated knowledge file and a clear improvement roadmap.
|
|
|
57
58
|
|
|
58
59
|
## 🤖 Agent Maturity Program (Target: All Agents ≥ 8.0)
|
|
59
60
|
|
|
60
|
-
We
|
|
61
|
+
We run a structured professionalization program. Current maturity levels (May 2026):
|
|
61
62
|
|
|
62
|
-
| Agent
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
| **@manager**
|
|
65
|
-
| **@backend**
|
|
66
|
-
| **@frontend
|
|
67
|
-
| **@analyst**
|
|
68
|
-
| **@explorer
|
|
69
|
-
| **@git**
|
|
70
|
-
| **@mobile**
|
|
71
|
-
| **@native**
|
|
63
|
+
| Agent | Current | Target | Priority | Status |
|
|
64
|
+
|--------------|---------|--------|------------|--------|
|
|
65
|
+
| **@manager** | 8.0 | 9.5 | High | Authority Audit & Enforcement active |
|
|
66
|
+
| **@backend** | 7.5 | 9.0 | High | Test culture & resilience being strengthened |
|
|
67
|
+
| **@frontend**| 6.5 | 9.0 | **Critical** | 8-week Professionalization Program running |
|
|
68
|
+
| **@analyst** | 6.5 | 8.5 | Medium | Governance audit capability improving |
|
|
69
|
+
| **@explorer**| 6.5 | 8.5 | Medium | Enterprise Discovery Protocol enforced |
|
|
70
|
+
| **@git** | 6.0 | 8.0 | Medium | High-risk commit control + workflows added |
|
|
71
|
+
| **@mobile** | 2.0 | 8.0 | Low (future) | Dormant (Baseline SOP added) |
|
|
72
|
+
| **@native** | 2.0 | 8.0 | Low (future) | Dormant (Baseline SOP added) |
|
|
72
73
|
|
|
73
|
-
Full
|
|
74
|
+
Full weekly plans are maintained in the Risk Tracking Dashboard.
|
|
74
75
|
|
|
75
76
|
---
|
|
76
77
|
|
|
77
|
-
## 🛡️ Key Governance Innovations (v0.6.
|
|
78
|
+
## 🛡️ Key Governance Innovations (v0.6.7)
|
|
78
79
|
|
|
79
80
|
### 1. Manager Authority Audit & Enforcement
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
+
Formal system requiring `@manager` to regularly audit its own control over all agents and enforce violations through a defined escalation ladder.
|
|
81
82
|
|
|
82
83
|
### 2. Hermes Live Test Program
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
+
Four mandatory real-world scenarios to move the Hermes protocol from “defined on paper” to “proven in practice”.
|
|
84
85
|
|
|
85
86
|
### 3. @frontend Professionalization Program
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
+
Eight-week intensive program covering component architecture (slots, composition), WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, performance engineering, testing discipline, and high-risk admin + Hermes integration.
|
|
87
88
|
|
|
88
89
|
### 4. Corporate CRUD & Administrative Governance
|
|
89
|
-
All high-risk operations (user/permission management, bulk deletion, system configuration, audit access, etc.) now require explicit
|
|
90
|
+
All high-risk operations (user/permission management, bulk deletion, system configuration, audit access, etc.) now require explicit `@manager` briefing, a `managerApproval` object, and complete before/after audit logging.
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
### 5. English-First Standardization (v0.6.7)
|
|
93
|
+
The entire framework (agent prompts, knowledge base, internal documentation, and core files) has been converted to professional English. Bilingual support is retained only for top-level user-facing documents.
|
|
90
94
|
|
|
91
95
|
---
|
|
92
96
|
|
|
@@ -94,17 +98,17 @@ All high-risk operations (user/permission management, bulk deletion, system conf
|
|
|
94
98
|
|
|
95
99
|
Agent Enderun is built on four layers:
|
|
96
100
|
|
|
97
|
-
- **Governance Layer** (`{{FRAMEWORK_DIR}}/`) — Constitution, memory, agent definitions, knowledge base, logs
|
|
101
|
+
- **Governance Layer** (`{{FRAMEWORK_DIR}}/`) — Constitution (ENDERUN.md), persistent memory (PROJECT_MEMORY.md), agent definitions, knowledge base, logs
|
|
98
102
|
- **Intelligence Layer** (`framework-mcp/`) — 40+ MCP tools for analysis, scaffolding, contract verification, and inter-agent communication
|
|
99
103
|
- **CLI Layer** (`bin/`) — Project initialization and adapter automation
|
|
100
|
-
- **Application Layer** (`apps/`) — Where
|
|
104
|
+
- **Application Layer** (`apps/`) — Where user applications live (reference application development paused in favor of agent capability hardening — Decision D004)
|
|
101
105
|
|
|
102
106
|
---
|
|
103
107
|
|
|
104
108
|
## ⚡ Quick Start
|
|
105
109
|
|
|
106
110
|
```bash
|
|
107
|
-
# 1. Initialize the framework (
|
|
111
|
+
# 1. Initialize the framework (creates .enderun/ structure)
|
|
108
112
|
npx agent-enderun init
|
|
109
113
|
|
|
110
114
|
# 2. Install dependencies
|
|
@@ -113,54 +117,59 @@ npm install
|
|
|
113
117
|
# 3. Build the framework
|
|
114
118
|
npm run enderun:build
|
|
115
119
|
|
|
116
|
-
# 4. Verify
|
|
120
|
+
# 4. Verify installation
|
|
117
121
|
npx agent-enderun check
|
|
118
122
|
```
|
|
119
123
|
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
124
|
+
**Custom Adapter Option:**
|
|
125
|
+
You can also initialize with a specific AI assistant/editor adapter:
|
|
126
|
+
`npx agent-enderun init [antigravity | claude | cursor | codex | gemini]`
|
|
122
127
|
|
|
123
|
-
For
|
|
128
|
+
For the complete step-by-step guide, see: [docs/getting-started.md](docs/getting-started.md)
|
|
124
129
|
|
|
125
130
|
---
|
|
126
131
|
|
|
127
|
-
## 🧠 Current Honest Status (
|
|
132
|
+
## 🧠 Current Honest Status (May 2026)
|
|
128
133
|
|
|
129
134
|
**Strong Areas:**
|
|
130
135
|
- Constitutional governance and mandatory rules
|
|
131
136
|
- Risk management and agent professionalization system
|
|
132
|
-
-
|
|
137
|
+
- Hermes protocol technical foundation + stateful messaging
|
|
133
138
|
- Backend patterns and contract-first discipline
|
|
134
139
|
- Memory discipline and audit logging
|
|
140
|
+
- Advanced enterprise adaptation guidelines (D004)
|
|
135
141
|
|
|
136
|
-
**Areas
|
|
137
|
-
-
|
|
138
|
-
-
|
|
139
|
-
- Hermes has not been
|
|
140
|
-
- Real long-term usage data is limited
|
|
141
|
-
-
|
|
142
|
+
**Areas Requiring Significant Work:**
|
|
143
|
+
- Build and test infrastructure resolved for framework-mcp package in v0.6.7 (tests locally runnable)
|
|
144
|
+
- No complete reference application (highest priority)
|
|
145
|
+
- Hermes protocol has not been executed in real multi-agent flows
|
|
146
|
+
- Real long-term usage data is very limited
|
|
147
|
+
- Governance rules are strong on paper but lack empirical validation in live systems
|
|
148
|
+
- Mobile and Native agents remain early-stage
|
|
142
149
|
|
|
143
150
|
---
|
|
144
151
|
|
|
145
152
|
## 📍 Next Major Milestones
|
|
146
153
|
|
|
147
|
-
1.
|
|
148
|
-
2.
|
|
149
|
-
3.
|
|
150
|
-
4. Raise all agents to minimum 8.0 maturity
|
|
154
|
+
1. Harden local test coverage and resolve sandbox environment dependencies (P0)
|
|
155
|
+
2. Execute at least one full Hermes Live Test scenario in a real agent session
|
|
156
|
+
3. Complete @frontend Professionalization Program (target: 9.0)
|
|
157
|
+
4. Raise all core agents to minimum 8.0 maturity with measurable evidence
|
|
158
|
+
5. Produce a minimal but complete reference application proving Kurumsal CRUD + managerApproval + Hermes in practice
|
|
151
159
|
|
|
152
160
|
---
|
|
153
161
|
|
|
154
162
|
## 📚 Further Reading
|
|
155
163
|
|
|
156
164
|
- **[docs/roadmap.md](docs/roadmap.md)** — Full Risk Tracking Dashboard and development roadmap
|
|
157
|
-
- **[docs/
|
|
165
|
+
- **[docs/action-plan-2026.md](docs/action-plan-2026.md)** — Strategic execution plan (Phase 1–3)
|
|
158
166
|
- **.enderun/agents/** — Detailed Standard Operating Procedures for all 8 agents
|
|
159
167
|
- **.enderun/knowledge/** — Specialized technical and governance guides
|
|
160
168
|
|
|
161
169
|
---
|
|
162
170
|
|
|
163
|
-
**Agent Enderun is not just a tool
|
|
171
|
+
**Agent Enderun is not just a tool.**
|
|
172
|
+
**It is a complete operating system for professional, risk-aware, AI-assisted software development.**
|
|
164
173
|
|
|
165
174
|
---
|
|
166
175
|
|
|
@@ -170,157 +179,63 @@ For a complete step-by-step guide, see: [docs/getting-started.md](docs/getting-s
|
|
|
170
179
|
|
|
171
180
|
## Yönetici Özeti
|
|
172
181
|
|
|
173
|
-
Agent Enderun, yazılım ekipleri için tasarlanmış **Anayasal Yönetişim
|
|
174
|
-
|
|
175
|
-
Çoğu AI kod aracı hız ve üretim kapasitesine odaklanırken, Agent Enderun **risk bilinci, denetlenebilirlik, izlenebilirlik ve sürekli profesyonel gelişim** üzerine kuruludur. Kaotik ve kontrolsüz AI çıktılarını yapılandırılmış, kurumsal standartlara uygun, denetlenebilir ve hesap verebilir işlere dönüştürür.
|
|
182
|
+
Agent Enderun, yazılım ekipleri için tasarlanmış **Anayasal Yönetişim** ve **Çoklu Ajan Orkestrasyonu** odaklı kurumsal düzeyde bir yapay zeka yönetim ve orkestrasyon framework’üdür.
|
|
176
183
|
|
|
177
|
-
|
|
184
|
+
Çoğu AI kod aracı hız ve üretim kapasitesine odaklanırken, Agent Enderun **risk bilinci, denetlenebilirlik, izlenebilirlik ve sürekli profesyonel gelişim** üzerine kuruludur.
|
|
178
185
|
|
|
179
|
-
|
|
186
|
+
### v0.6.7 Stratejik Odak
|
|
180
187
|
|
|
181
|
-
|
|
188
|
+
Bu sürümün ana konusu **profesyonelleşme ve dil standardizasyonu**dur:
|
|
189
|
+
- Tüm ajan prompt’ları, bilgi tabanı ve iç dokümantasyon profesyonel İngilizceye dönüştürülmüştür.
|
|
190
|
+
- Teknik borç ve yönetişim boşlukları dürüstçe analiz edilmiştir.
|
|
191
|
+
- Build sağlığı, test kapsamı ve yönetişim kurallarının ampirik doğrulanması için temel atılmıştır.
|
|
182
192
|
|
|
183
|
-
|
|
184
|
-
> Tüm aktif risklerin güncel durumunu görmek için: [docs/roadmap.md](docs/roadmap.md)
|
|
193
|
+
Tüm aktif risklerin güncel durumu için: [docs/roadmap.md](docs/roadmap.md)
|
|
185
194
|
|
|
186
195
|
---
|
|
187
196
|
|
|
188
197
|
## 🎯 Temel Felsefe
|
|
189
198
|
|
|
190
|
-
|
|
191
|
-
|
|
192
|
-
1. **Tek Yetki Noktası** — Kurumsal projelerde @manager tek yetkili giriş noktasıdır. Hiçbir uzman ajan, resmi ve yapılandırılmış bir briefing almadan kullanıcıya cevap veremez veya iş yapamaz.
|
|
193
|
-
2. **Risk Öncelikli Yaklaşım** — Her önemli işlem öncesi risk değerlendirmesi yapılır. Yüksek riskli işlemler için açık @manager onayı ve detaylı audit kaydı zorunludur.
|
|
194
|
-
3. **Sürekli Ajan Geliştirme** — Tüm ajanların olgunluk hedefi minimum **8.0/10** olarak belirlenmiştir. Kritik alanlarda “yeterince iyi” kabul edilmez.
|
|
195
|
-
4. **Sıfır Tolerans** — Yönetişimi bypass eden her girişim (Hermes kullanımı, briefing zorunluluğu, memory güncelleme, yüksek riskli işlem kontrolleri) ciddi süreç ihlali olarak değerlendirilir ve kayıt altına alınır.
|
|
196
|
-
|
|
197
|
-
---
|
|
198
|
-
|
|
199
|
-
## 📊 Aktif Risk Takip Panosu (23 Mayıs 2026)
|
|
200
|
-
|
|
201
|
-
Şu anda aşağıdaki 6 kritik risk, özel iyileştirme programlarıyla aktif olarak yönetilmektedir:
|
|
202
|
-
|
|
203
|
-
| Risk | Mevcut Durum | İlerleme Durumu | Sahip |
|
|
204
|
-
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------|
|
|
205
|
-
| Referans Uygulama Yokluğu | Henüz production-grade bir örnek proje yok | Rehber ve program tanımlandı | @manager |
|
|
206
|
-
| @frontend Zayıflığı | Bileşen mimarisi ve erişilebilirlik zayıf | 6-8 haftalık Profesyonelleşme Programı aktif | @manager |
|
|
207
|
-
| Hermes “Kağıt Üzerinde” | Protokol tanımlı ancak gerçek hayatta test edilmedi | 4 senaryoluk Canlı Test Programı tanımlandı | @manager |
|
|
208
|
-
| Claude Otomasyonu | Yarı otomatik, farklı versiyonlarda sorunlar var | %60 | @manager |
|
|
209
|
-
| Gerçek Kullanım Eksikliği | Gerçek projelerde uzun süreli kullanım verisi yok | %0 | @manager |
|
|
210
|
-
| Kurumsal Yönetişim | Kurallar kağıt üzerinde güçlü, kanıt henüz yetersiz | %85 | @manager |
|
|
211
|
-
|
|
212
|
-
Her risk için ayrı bir knowledge dosyası ve net bir iyileştirme yol haritası bulunmaktadır.
|
|
213
|
-
|
|
214
|
-
---
|
|
215
|
-
|
|
216
|
-
## 🤖 Ajan Olgunluk Programı (Hedef: Tüm Ajanlar ≥ 8.0)
|
|
217
|
-
|
|
218
|
-
Tüm ajanlar için yapılandırılmış bir profesyonelleşme programı yürütülmektedir. Mayıs 2026 itibarıyla mevcut olgunluk seviyeleri şu şekildedir:
|
|
199
|
+
Dört vazgeçilmez ilke üzerine inşa edilmiştir:
|
|
219
200
|
|
|
220
|
-
|
|
221
|
-
|
|
222
|
-
|
|
223
|
-
|
|
224
|
-
| **@frontend** | 6.5 | 9.0 | **Kritik** | 8 haftalık Profesyonelleşme Programı devam ediyor |
|
|
225
|
-
| **@analyst** | 6.5 | 8.5 | Orta | Governance denetim ve metrik yeteneği geliştiriliyor |
|
|
226
|
-
| **@explorer** | 6.5 | 8.5 | Orta | Riskli alan raporlaması zorunlu hale getiriliyor |
|
|
227
|
-
| **@git** | 6.0 | 8.0 | Orta | Yüksek riskli commit kontrolü eklendi |
|
|
228
|
-
| **@mobile** | 2.0 | 8.0 | Düşük | İleride büyük çalışma gerekecek |
|
|
229
|
-
| **@native** | 2.0 | 8.0 | Düşük | İleride büyük çalışma gerekecek |
|
|
230
|
-
|
|
231
|
-
Detaylı haftalık planlar ve gelişim raporları Risk Takip Panosu’nda yer almaktadır.
|
|
201
|
+
1. **Tek Yetki Noktası** — Kurumsal projelerde `@manager` tek yetkili giriş noktasıdır.
|
|
202
|
+
2. **Risk Öncelikli Yaklaşım** — Her önemli işlem öncesi risk değerlendirmesi zorunludur.
|
|
203
|
+
3. **Sürekli Ajan Geliştirme** — Tüm ajanların olgunluk hedefi minimum **8.0/10**’dur.
|
|
204
|
+
4. **Sıfır Tolerans** — Yönetişimi bypass eden her girişim ciddi süreç ihlali olarak kabul edilir.
|
|
232
205
|
|
|
233
206
|
---
|
|
234
207
|
|
|
235
|
-
## 🛡️ Önemli Yönetişim Yenilikleri (v0.6.
|
|
236
|
-
|
|
237
|
-
### 1. Manager Authority Audit & Enforcement
|
|
238
|
-
@manager’ın tüm ajanlar üzerindeki kontrolünü düzenli olarak denetlemesini ve ihlalleri tanımlanmış bir süreçle (düzeltme → kayıt → koçluk → kapsam kısıtlama) düzeltmesini sağlayan resmi sistem.
|
|
208
|
+
## 🛡️ Önemli Yönetişim Yenilikleri (v0.6.7)
|
|
239
209
|
|
|
240
|
-
|
|
241
|
-
Hermes
|
|
242
|
-
|
|
243
|
-
|
|
244
|
-
|
|
245
|
-
|
|
246
|
-
### 4. Kurumsal CRUD ve Yönetimsel İşlem Yönetişimi
|
|
247
|
-
Kullanıcı/yetki yönetimi, toplu silme, sistem konfigürasyonu, audit log erişimi gibi yüksek riskli işlemler artık zorunlu @manager briefing, `managerApproval` nesnesi ve detaylı before/after audit log ile yapılmak zorundadır.
|
|
210
|
+
- Manager Authority Audit & Enforcement
|
|
211
|
+
- Hermes Live Test Program (4 zorunlu senaryo)
|
|
212
|
+
- @frontend Profesyonelleşme Programı (8 hafta)
|
|
213
|
+
- Kurumsal CRUD ve Yönetimsel İşlem Yönetişimi (`managerApproval`)
|
|
214
|
+
- **v0.6.7:** Tüm framework İngilizce standardizasyonu ve MCP derleme hatası düzeltmesi
|
|
248
215
|
|
|
249
216
|
---
|
|
250
217
|
|
|
251
|
-
##
|
|
218
|
+
## 🧠 Dürüst Durum (Mayıs 2026)
|
|
252
219
|
|
|
253
|
-
|
|
220
|
+
**Güçlü Yönler:** Anayasal yönetişim, risk yönetimi, Hermes protokolü temeli, contract-first disiplin, ileri düzey kurumsal adaptasyon kuralları.
|
|
254
221
|
|
|
255
|
-
|
|
256
|
-
- **Zeka Katmanı** (`framework-mcp/`) — 40+ MCP aracı (kod analizi, scaffolding, kontrat doğrulama, ajan iletişimi, güvenlik taraması vb.)
|
|
257
|
-
- **CLI Katmanı** (`bin/`) — Proje başlatma ve adaptör otomasyonu
|
|
258
|
-
- **Uygulama Katmanı** (`apps/`) — Gerçek kullanıcı uygulamalarının geliştirileceği alan (şu anda boş — referans uygulama en yüksek önceliktir)
|
|
259
|
-
|
|
260
|
-
---
|
|
261
|
-
|
|
262
|
-
## ⚡ Hızlı Başlangıç
|
|
263
|
-
|
|
264
|
-
```bash
|
|
265
|
-
# 1. Framework'ü başlat (.enderun/ klasörünü oluşturur)
|
|
266
|
-
npx agent-enderun init
|
|
267
|
-
|
|
268
|
-
# 2. Bağımlılıkları yükle
|
|
269
|
-
npm install
|
|
270
|
-
|
|
271
|
-
# 3. Framework’ü derle
|
|
272
|
-
npm run enderun:build
|
|
273
|
-
|
|
274
|
-
# 4. Kurulumu doğrula
|
|
275
|
-
npx agent-enderun check
|
|
276
|
-
```
|
|
277
|
-
|
|
278
|
-
> **💡 Özel Adaptör Seçeneği:** İsterseniz belirli bir yapay zeka asistanı veya editör adaptörü ile de başlatabilirsiniz:
|
|
279
|
-
> `npx agent-enderun init [antigravity | claude | cursor | codex | gemini]`
|
|
280
|
-
|
|
281
|
-
Adım adım detaylı kurulum rehberi için: [docs/getting-started.md](docs/getting-started.md)
|
|
282
|
-
|
|
283
|
-
---
|
|
284
|
-
|
|
285
|
-
## 🧠 Dürüst Durum (23 Mayıs 2026)
|
|
286
|
-
|
|
287
|
-
**Güçlü Yönler:**
|
|
288
|
-
- Anayasal yönetişim ve zorunlu kurallar sistemi
|
|
289
|
-
- Risk yönetimi ve ajan profesyonelleşme altyapısı
|
|
290
|
-
- Hermes protokolünün teknik temeli ve zorunlu kullanım kuralları
|
|
291
|
-
- Backend tarafında güçlü desenler ve contract-first disiplini
|
|
292
|
-
- Bellek disiplini ve kalıcı denetim kaydı
|
|
293
|
-
|
|
294
|
-
**Hâlâ Geliştirilmesi Gereken Alanlar:**
|
|
295
|
-
- Henüz tam teşekküllü bir referans uygulama bulunmamaktadır (en yüksek öncelik)
|
|
296
|
-
- @frontend henüz hedef olgunluk seviyesine ulaşmamıştır
|
|
297
|
-
- Hermes protokolü henüz gerçek çoklu ajan senaryolarında tam olarak test edilmemiştir
|
|
298
|
-
- Gerçek uzun vadeli kullanım verisi sınırlıdır
|
|
299
|
-
- Mobile ve Native ajanlar erken aşamadadır
|
|
222
|
+
**Geliştirilmesi Gereken Alanlar:** Build ve test altyapısı kırık, referans uygulama yok, Hermes henüz canlı test edilmemiş, gerçek kullanım verisi sınırlı, yönetişim kuralları kağıt üzerinde güçlü ancak pratikte kanıtlanmamış.
|
|
300
223
|
|
|
301
224
|
---
|
|
302
225
|
|
|
303
226
|
## 📍 Önümüzdeki Önemli Hedefler
|
|
304
227
|
|
|
305
|
-
1.
|
|
306
|
-
2.
|
|
307
|
-
3.
|
|
308
|
-
4. Tüm ajanları
|
|
309
|
-
|
|
310
|
-
---
|
|
311
|
-
|
|
312
|
-
## 📚 İlgili Dokümanlar
|
|
313
|
-
|
|
314
|
-
- **[docs/roadmap.md](docs/roadmap.md)** — Risk Takip Panosu ve geliştirme yol haritası
|
|
315
|
-
- **[docs/strategic-review-2026-05.md](docs/strategic-review-2026-05.md)** — Bağımsız stratejik değerlendirme raporu
|
|
316
|
-
- **.enderun/agents/** — 8 ajanın detaylı Standart İş Prosedürleri (SOP)
|
|
317
|
-
- **.enderun/knowledge/** — Uzmanlaşmış teknik ve yönetişim rehberleri
|
|
228
|
+
1. Build, lint ve test pipeline’ını düzeltmek (P0)
|
|
229
|
+
2. En az bir Hermes Live Test senaryosunu gerçek ajan oturumunda çalıştırmak
|
|
230
|
+
3. @frontend Profesyonelleşme Programını tamamlamak
|
|
231
|
+
4. Tüm ajanları ölçülebilir şekilde 8.0+ olgunluğa çıkarmak
|
|
232
|
+
5. Kurumsal CRUD + managerApproval + Hermes’i kanıtlayan minimal referans uygulama üretmek
|
|
318
233
|
|
|
319
234
|
---
|
|
320
235
|
|
|
321
236
|
**Agent Enderun yalnızca bir araç değildir.**
|
|
322
|
-
**Profesyonel, yapay zeka destekli yazılım geliştirme süreçleri için eksiksiz bir işletim sistemidir.**
|
|
237
|
+
**Profesyonel, risk farkındalıklı, yapay zeka destekli yazılım geliştirme süreçleri için eksiksiz bir işletim sistemidir.**
|
|
323
238
|
|
|
324
239
|
---
|
|
325
240
|
|
|
326
|
-
**
|
|
241
|
+
**v0.6.7 — English Standardization & MCP Build Fix Release**
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
#!/usr/bin/env node
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
/**
|
|
4
|
+
* Agent Enderun — Hermes Protocol Stateful Simulation Sandbox
|
|
5
|
+
*
|
|
6
|
+
* Demonstrates:
|
|
7
|
+
* - Scenario 1: Autonomous task delegation.
|
|
8
|
+
* - Scenario 2: High-risk admin action block & managerApproval injection.
|
|
9
|
+
*/
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
import fs from "fs";
|
|
12
|
+
import path from "path";
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
const MESSAGES_DIR = path.resolve("./.enderun/messages");
|
|
15
|
+
const TRACE_ID = "01H7K9P2Q3R4S5T6U7V8W9X0Z2";
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
console.log("🎬 STARTING HERMES PROTOCOL STATEFUL SANDBOX...");
|
|
18
|
+
console.log(`Trace ID: ${TRACE_ID}`);
|
|
19
|
+
console.log("--------------------------------------------------");
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
// Ensure messages directory exists
|
|
22
|
+
if (!fs.existsSync(MESSAGES_DIR)) {
|
|
23
|
+
fs.mkdirSync(MESSAGES_DIR, { recursive: true });
|
|
24
|
+
}
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
// Clean up previous test messages
|
|
27
|
+
const cleanInbox = (agent) => {
|
|
28
|
+
const p = path.join(MESSAGES_DIR, `${agent}.json`);
|
|
29
|
+
if (fs.existsSync(p)) fs.unlinkSync(p);
|
|
30
|
+
};
|
|
31
|
+
cleanInbox("backend");
|
|
32
|
+
cleanInbox("manager");
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
function sendMessage(from, to, content, category = "INFO") {
|
|
35
|
+
const messagePath = path.join(MESSAGES_DIR, `${to}.json`);
|
|
36
|
+
const messages = fs.existsSync(messagePath) ? JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(messagePath, "utf-8")) : [];
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
const msg = {
|
|
39
|
+
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
40
|
+
from,
|
|
41
|
+
to,
|
|
42
|
+
traceId: TRACE_ID,
|
|
43
|
+
category,
|
|
44
|
+
priority: "HIGH",
|
|
45
|
+
content,
|
|
46
|
+
status: "PENDING"
|
|
47
|
+
};
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
messages.push(msg);
|
|
50
|
+
fs.writeFileSync(messagePath, JSON.stringify(messages, null, 2));
|
|
51
|
+
console.log(`📡 [Hermes Msg] ${from} ➡️ ${to} [${category}]: "${content}"`);
|
|
52
|
+
}
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
function readInbox(agent) {
|
|
55
|
+
const messagePath = path.join(MESSAGES_DIR, `${agent}.json`);
|
|
56
|
+
if (!fs.existsSync(messagePath)) return [];
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
const messages = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(messagePath, "utf-8"));
|
|
59
|
+
const pending = messages.filter(m => m.status === "PENDING" || m.status === "READ");
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
// Mark as read
|
|
62
|
+
const updated = messages.map(m => m.status === "PENDING" ? { ...m, status: "READ" } : m);
|
|
63
|
+
fs.writeFileSync(messagePath, JSON.stringify(updated, null, 2));
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
return pending;
|
|
66
|
+
}
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
function updateStatus(agent, traceId, status) {
|
|
69
|
+
const messagePath = path.join(MESSAGES_DIR, `${agent}.json`);
|
|
70
|
+
if (!fs.existsSync(messagePath)) return;
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
const messages = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(messagePath, "utf-8"));
|
|
73
|
+
const updated = messages.map(m => m.traceId === traceId ? { ...m, status } : m);
|
|
74
|
+
fs.writeFileSync(messagePath, JSON.stringify(updated, null, 2));
|
|
75
|
+
console.log(`🔒 [Hermes LifeCycle] Message on @${agent} marked as: ${status}`);
|
|
76
|
+
}
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
// --- STEP 1: @manager Delegates Task (Scenario 1) ---
|
|
79
|
+
console.log("\n[Step 1: Task Scaffolding & Briefing Delegation]");
|
|
80
|
+
sendMessage("manager", "backend", "Upgrade User 42 role to SuperAdmin inside target database.", "DELEGATION");
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
// --- STEP 2: @backend Reads & Detects High-Risk Action without approval (Scenario 2) ---
|
|
83
|
+
console.log("\n[Step 2: @backend Inbox Check & High-Risk Guard Trigger]");
|
|
84
|
+
const backendInbox1 = readInbox("backend");
|
|
85
|
+
const taskMsg = backendInbox1.find(m => m.category === "DELEGATION");
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
if (taskMsg) {
|
|
88
|
+
console.log(`⚙️ @backend is processing delegation trace: ${taskMsg.traceId}`);
|
|
89
|
+
console.log("⚠️ @backend security check: 'Upgrade User 42 role' detected as High-Risk Administrative Action!");
|
|
90
|
+
console.log("❌ @backend security block: Action rejected due to missing 'managerApproval' signature payload!");
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
sendMessage("backend", "manager", "ALERT: Cannot upgrade role for User 42. High-risk administrative action requires dynamic 'managerApproval' token.", "ALERT");
|
|
93
|
+
updateStatus("backend", TRACE_ID, "REJECTED");
|
|
94
|
+
}
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
// --- STEP 3: @manager Processes Block, Generates Approval Token, Re-sends msg ---
|
|
97
|
+
console.log("\n[Step 3: @manager Token Generation & Re-Delegation]");
|
|
98
|
+
const managerInbox = readInbox("manager");
|
|
99
|
+
const alertMsg = managerInbox.find(m => m.category === "ALERT");
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
if (alertMsg) {
|
|
102
|
+
console.log(`💡 @manager received alert: "${alertMsg.content}"`);
|
|
103
|
+
console.log("🔐 @manager Dynamic Key Signing active...");
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
const approvalToken = {
|
|
106
|
+
approved: true,
|
|
107
|
+
traceId: TRACE_ID,
|
|
108
|
+
approvedBy: "@manager",
|
|
109
|
+
approvedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
110
|
+
reason: "Authorized Role Upgrade for Enterprise Compliance",
|
|
111
|
+
riskLevel: "Critical",
|
|
112
|
+
rollbackPlan: "Demote role back to standard User via database rollback script."
|
|
113
|
+
};
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
console.log("✅ managerApproval Token generated successfully:", JSON.stringify(approvalToken, null, 2));
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
sendMessage("manager", "backend", `APPROVED: Here is the signed token: ${JSON.stringify(approvalToken)}`, "DELEGATION");
|
|
118
|
+
}
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
// --- STEP 4: @backend Receives Approval, Executes Simulated DDL/DML, Completes lifecycle ---
|
|
121
|
+
console.log("\n[Step 4: @backend final validation and execution]");
|
|
122
|
+
const backendInbox2 = readInbox("backend");
|
|
123
|
+
const approvedMsg = backendInbox2.find(m => m.category === "DELEGATION" && m.content.startsWith("APPROVED:"));
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
if (approvedMsg) {
|
|
126
|
+
console.log("📥 @backend received approval token.");
|
|
127
|
+
console.log("🛡️ @backend validation: managerApproval signature MATCHED.");
|
|
128
|
+
console.log("🚀 @backend execution: Running mock SQL transaction... 'UPDATE users SET role = 'SuperAdmin' WHERE id = 42;'");
|
|
129
|
+
console.log("📝 @backend logging: Audit log record generated with Trace ID.");
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
sendMessage("backend", "manager", "SUCCESS: User 42 successfully upgraded to SuperAdmin. Trace record finalized.", "INFO");
|
|
132
|
+
updateStatus("backend", TRACE_ID, "COMPLETED");
|
|
133
|
+
}
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
console.log("\n--------------------------------------------------");
|
|
136
|
+
console.log("🎉 HERMES STATEFUL SIMULATION COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY!");
|