ag-cortex 0.1.0

package/.agent/skills/create-agent-skills/references/using-templates.md

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+# Using Templates in Skills
+
+<purpose>
+Templates are reusable output structures that Antigravity copies and fills in. They ensure consistent, high-quality outputs without regenerating structure each time.
+</purpose>
+
+<when_to_use>
+Use templates when:
+- Output should have consistent structure across invocations
+- The structure matters more than creative generation
+- Filling placeholders is more reliable than blank-page generation
+- Users expect predictable, professional-looking outputs
+
+Common template types:
+- **Plans** - Project plans, implementation plans, migration plans
+- **Specifications** - Technical specs, feature specs, API specs
+- **Documents** - Reports, proposals, summaries
+- **Configurations** - Config files, settings, environment setups
+- **Scaffolds** - File structures, boilerplate code
+</when_to_use>
+
+<template_structure>
+Templates live in `templates/` within the skill directory:
+
+```
+skill-name/
+├── SKILL.md
+├── workflows/
+├── references/
+└── templates/
+    ├── plan-template.md
+    ├── spec-template.md
+    └── report-template.md
+```
+
+A template file contains:
+1. Clear section markers
+2. Placeholder indicators (use `{{placeholder}}` or `[PLACEHOLDER]`)
+3. Inline guidance for what goes where
+4. Example content where helpful
+</template_structure>
+
+<template_example>
+```markdown
+# {{PROJECT_NAME}} Implementation Plan
+
+## Overview
+{{1-2 sentence summary of what this plan covers}}
+
+## Goals
+- {{Primary goal}}
+- {{Secondary goals...}}
+
+## Scope
+**In scope:**
+- {{What's included}}
+
+**Out of scope:**
+- {{What's explicitly excluded}}
+
+## Phases
+
+### Phase 1: {{Phase name}}
+**Duration:** {{Estimated duration}}
+**Deliverables:**
+- {{Deliverable 1}}
+- {{Deliverable 2}}
+
+### Phase 2: {{Phase name}}
+...
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] {{Measurable criterion 1}}
+- [ ] {{Measurable criterion 2}}
+
+## Risks
+| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
+|------|------------|--------|------------|
+| {{Risk}} | {{H/M/L}} | {{H/M/L}} | {{Strategy}} |
+```
+</template_example>
+
+<workflow_integration>
+Workflows reference templates like this:
+
+```xml
+<process>
+## Step 3: Generate Plan
+
+1. Read `templates/plan-template.md`
+2. Copy the template structure
+3. Fill each placeholder based on gathered requirements
+4. Review for completeness
+</process>
+```
+
+The workflow tells Antigravity WHEN to use the template. The template provides WHAT structure to produce.
+</workflow_integration>
+
+<best_practices>
+**Do:**
+- Keep templates focused on structure, not content
+- Use clear placeholder syntax consistently
+- Include brief inline guidance where sections might be ambiguous
+- Make templates complete but minimal
+
+**Don't:**
+- Put excessive example content that might be copied verbatim
+- Create templates for outputs that genuinely need creative generation
+- Over-constrain with too many required sections
+- Forget to update templates when requirements change
+</best_practices>

package/.agent/skills/create-agent-skills/references/workflows-and-validation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,510 @@
+<overview>
+This reference covers patterns for complex workflows, validation loops, and feedback cycles in skill authoring. All patterns use pure XML structure.
+</overview>
+
+<complex_workflows>
+<principle>
+Break complex operations into clear, sequential steps. For particularly complex workflows, provide a checklist.
+</principle>
+
+<pdf_forms_example>
+```xml
+<objective>
+Fill PDF forms with validated data from JSON field mappings.
+</objective>
+
+<workflow>
+Copy this checklist and check off items as you complete them:
+
+```
+Task Progress:
+- [ ] Step 1: Analyze the form (run analyze_form.py)
+- [ ] Step 2: Create field mapping (edit fields.json)
+- [ ] Step 3: Validate mapping (run validate_fields.py)
+- [ ] Step 4: Fill the form (run fill_form.py)
+- [ ] Step 5: Verify output (run verify_output.py)
+```
+
+<step_1>
+**Analyze the form**
+
+Run: `python scripts/analyze_form.py input.pdf`
+
+This extracts form fields and their locations, saving to `fields.json`.
+</step_1>
+
+<step_2>
+**Create field mapping**
+
+Edit `fields.json` to add values for each field.
+</step_2>
+
+<step_3>
+**Validate mapping**
+
+Run: `python scripts/validate_fields.py fields.json`
+
+Fix any validation errors before continuing.
+</step_3>
+
+<step_4>
+**Fill the form**
+
+Run: `python scripts/fill_form.py input.pdf fields.json output.pdf`
+</step_4>
+
+<step_5>
+**Verify output**
+
+Run: `python scripts/verify_output.py output.pdf`
+
+If verification fails, return to Step 2.
+</step_5>
+</workflow>
+```
+</pdf_forms_example>
+
+<when_to_use>
+Use checklist pattern when:
+- Workflow has 5+ sequential steps
+- Steps must be completed in order
+- Progress tracking helps prevent errors
+- Easy resumption after interruption is valuable
+</when_to_use>
+</complex_workflows>
+
+<feedback_loops>
+<validate_fix_repeat_pattern>
+<principle>
+Run validator → fix errors → repeat. This pattern greatly improves output quality.
+</principle>
+
+<document_editing_example>
+```xml
+<objective>
+Edit OOXML documents with XML validation at each step.
+</objective>
+
+<editing_process>
+<step_1>
+Make your edits to `word/document.xml`
+</step_1>
+
+<step_2>
+**Validate immediately**: `python ooxml/scripts/validate.py unpacked_dir/`
+</step_2>
+
+<step_3>
+If validation fails:
+- Review the error message carefully
+- Fix the issues in the XML
+- Run validation again
+</step_3>
+
+<step_4>
+**Only proceed when validation passes**
+</step_4>
+
+<step_5>
+Rebuild: `python ooxml/scripts/pack.py unpacked_dir/ output.docx`
+</step_5>
+
+<step_6>
+Test the output document
+</step_6>
+</editing_process>
+
+<validation>
+Never skip validation. Catching errors early prevents corrupted output files.
+</validation>
+```
+</document_editing_example>
+
+<why_it_works>
+- Catches errors early before changes are applied
+- Machine-verifiable with objective verification
+- Plan can be iterated without touching originals
+- Reduces total iteration cycles
+</why_it_works>
+</validate_fix_repeat_pattern>
+
+<plan_validate_execute_pattern>
+<principle>
+When Antigravity performs complex, open-ended tasks, create a plan in a structured format, validate it, then execute.
+
+Workflow: analyze → **create plan file** → **validate plan** → execute → verify
+</principle>
+
+<batch_update_example>
+```xml
+<objective>
+Apply batch updates to spreadsheet with plan validation.
+</objective>
+
+<workflow>
+<plan_phase>
+<step_1>
+Analyze the spreadsheet and requirements
+</step_1>
+
+<step_2>
+Create `changes.json` with all planned updates
+</step_2>
+</plan_phase>
+
+<validation_phase>
+<step_3>
+Validate the plan: `python scripts/validate_changes.py changes.json`
+</step_3>
+
+<step_4>
+If validation fails:
+- Review error messages
+- Fix issues in changes.json
+- Validate again
+</step_4>
+
+<step_5>
+Only proceed when validation passes
+</step_5>
+</validation_phase>
+
+<execution_phase>
+<step_6>
+Apply changes: `python scripts/apply_changes.py changes.json`
+</step_6>
+
+<step_7>
+Verify output
+</step_7>
+</execution_phase>
+</workflow>
+
+<success_criteria>
+- Plan validation passes with zero errors
+- All changes applied successfully
+- Output verification confirms expected results
+</success_criteria>
+```
+</batch_update_example>
+
+<implementation_tip>
+Make validation scripts verbose with specific error messages:
+
+**Good error message**:
+"Field 'signature_date' not found. Available fields: customer_name, order_total, signature_date_signed"
+
+**Bad error message**:
+"Invalid field"
+
+Specific errors help Antigravity fix issues without guessing.
+</implementation_tip>
+
+<when_to_use>
+Use plan-validate-execute when:
+- Operations are complex and error-prone
+- Changes are irreversible or difficult to undo
+- Planning can be validated independently
+- Catching errors early saves significant time
+</when_to_use>
+</plan_validate_execute_pattern>
+</feedback_loops>
+
+<conditional_workflows>
+<principle>
+Guide Antigravity through decision points with clear branching logic.
+</principle>
+
+<document_modification_example>
+```xml
+<objective>
+Modify DOCX files using appropriate method based on task type.
+</objective>
+
+<workflow>
+<decision_point_1>
+Determine the modification type:
+
+**Creating new content?** → Follow "Creation workflow"
+**Editing existing content?** → Follow "Editing workflow"
+</decision_point_1>
+
+<creation_workflow>
+<objective>Build documents from scratch</objective>
+
+<steps>
+1. Use docx-js library
+2. Build document from scratch
+3. Export to .docx format
+</steps>
+</creation_workflow>
+
+<editing_workflow>
+<objective>Modify existing documents</objective>
+
+<steps>
+1. Unpack existing document
+2. Modify XML directly
+3. Validate after each change
+4. Repack when complete
+</steps>
+</editing_workflow>
+</workflow>
+
+<success_criteria>
+- Correct workflow chosen based on task type
+- All steps in chosen workflow completed
+- Output file validated and verified
+</success_criteria>
+```
+</document_modification_example>
+
+<when_to_use>
+Use conditional workflows when:
+- Different task types require different approaches
+- Decision points are clear and well-defined
+- Workflows are mutually exclusive
+- Guiding Antigravity to correct path improves outcomes
+</when_to_use>
+</conditional_workflows>
+
+<validation_scripts>
+<principles>
+Validation scripts are force multipliers. They catch errors that Antigravity might miss and provide actionable feedback for fixing issues.
+</principles>
+
+<characteristics_of_good_validation>
+<verbose_errors>
+**Good**: "Field 'signature_date' not found. Available fields: customer_name, order_total, signature_date_signed"
+
+**Bad**: "Invalid field"
+
+Verbose errors help Antigravity fix issues in one iteration instead of multiple rounds of guessing.
+</verbose_errors>
+
+<specific_feedback>
+**Good**: "Line 47: Expected closing tag `</paragraph>` but found `</section>`"
+
+**Bad**: "XML syntax error"
+
+Specific feedback pinpoints exact location and nature of the problem.
+</specific_feedback>
+
+<actionable_suggestions>
+**Good**: "Required field 'customer_name' is missing. Add: {\"customer_name\": \"value\"}"
+
+**Bad**: "Missing required field"
+
+Actionable suggestions show Antigravity exactly what to fix.
+</actionable_suggestions>
+
+<available_options>
+When validation fails, show available valid options:
+
+**Good**: "Invalid status 'pending_review'. Valid statuses: active, paused, archived"
+
+**Bad**: "Invalid status"
+
+Showing valid options eliminates guesswork.
+</available_options>
+</characteristics_of_good_validation>
+
+<implementation_pattern>
+```xml
+<validation>
+After making changes, validate immediately:
+
+```bash
+python scripts/validate.py output_dir/
+```
+
+If validation fails, fix errors before continuing. Validation errors include:
+
+- **Field not found**: "Field 'signature_date' not found. Available fields: customer_name, order_total, signature_date_signed"
+- **Type mismatch**: "Field 'order_total' expects number, got string"
+- **Missing required field**: "Required field 'customer_name' is missing"
+- **Invalid value**: "Invalid status 'pending_review'. Valid statuses: active, paused, archived"
+
+Only proceed when validation passes with zero errors.
+</validation>
+```
+</implementation_pattern>
+
+<benefits>
+- Catches errors before they propagate
+- Reduces iteration cycles
+- Provides learning feedback
+- Makes debugging deterministic
+- Enables confident execution
+</benefits>
+</validation_scripts>
+
+<iterative_refinement>
+<principle>
+Many workflows benefit from iteration: generate → validate → refine → validate → finalize.
+</principle>
+
+<implementation_example>
+```xml
+<objective>
+Generate reports with iterative quality improvement.
+</objective>
+
+<workflow>
+<iteration_1>
+**Generate initial draft**
+
+Create report based on data and requirements.
+</iteration_1>
+
+<iteration_2>
+**Validate draft**
+
+Run: `python scripts/validate_report.py draft.md`
+
+Fix any structural issues, missing sections, or data errors.
+</iteration_2>
+
+<iteration_3>
+**Refine content**
+
+Improve clarity, add supporting data, enhance visualizations.
+</iteration_3>
+
+<iteration_4>
+**Final validation**
+
+Run: `python scripts/validate_report.py final.md`
+
+Ensure all quality criteria met.
+</iteration_4>
+
+<iteration_5>
+**Finalize**
+
+Export to final format and deliver.
+</iteration_5>
+</workflow>
+
+<success_criteria>
+- Final validation passes with zero errors
+- All quality criteria met
+- Report ready for delivery
+</success_criteria>
+```
+</implementation_example>
+
+<when_to_use>
+Use iterative refinement when:
+- Quality improves with multiple passes
+- Validation provides actionable feedback
+- Time permits iteration
+- Perfect output matters more than speed
+</when_to_use>
+</iterative_refinement>
+
+<checkpoint_pattern>
+<principle>
+For long workflows, add checkpoints where Antigravity can pause and verify progress before continuing.
+</principle>
+
+<implementation_example>
+```xml
+<workflow>
+<phase_1>
+**Data collection** (Steps 1-3)
+
+1. Extract data from source
+2. Transform to target format
+3. **CHECKPOINT**: Verify data completeness
+
+Only continue if checkpoint passes.
+</phase_1>
+
+<phase_2>
+**Data processing** (Steps 4-6)
+
+4. Apply business rules
+5. Validate transformations
+6. **CHECKPOINT**: Verify processing accuracy
+
+Only continue if checkpoint passes.
+</phase_2>
+
+<phase_3>
+**Output generation** (Steps 7-9)
+
+7. Generate output files
+8. Validate output format
+9. **CHECKPOINT**: Verify final output
+
+Proceed to delivery only if checkpoint passes.
+</phase_3>
+</workflow>
+
+<checkpoint_validation>
+At each checkpoint:
+1. Run validation script
+2. Review output for correctness
+3. Verify no errors or warnings
+4. Only proceed when validation passes
+</checkpoint_validation>
+```
+</implementation_example>
+
+<benefits>
+- Prevents cascading errors
+- Easier to diagnose issues
+- Clear progress indicators
+- Natural pause points for review
+- Reduces wasted work from early errors
+</benefits>
+</checkpoint_pattern>
+
+<error_recovery>
+<principle>
+Design workflows with clear error recovery paths. Antigravity should know what to do when things go wrong.
+</principle>
+
+<implementation_example>
+```xml
+<workflow>
+<normal_path>
+1. Process input file
+2. Validate output
+3. Save results
+</normal_path>
+
+<error_recovery>
+**If validation fails in step 2:**
+- Review validation errors
+- Check if input file is corrupted → Return to step 1 with different input
+- Check if processing logic failed → Fix logic, return to step 1
+- Check if output format wrong → Fix format, return to step 2
+
+**If save fails in step 3:**
+- Check disk space
+- Check file permissions
+- Check file path validity
+- Retry save with corrected conditions
+</error_recovery>
+
+<escalation>
+**If error persists after 3 attempts:**
+- Document the error with full context
+- Save partial results if available
+- Report issue to user with diagnostic information
+</escalation>
+</workflow>
+```
+</implementation_example>
+
+<when_to_use>
+Include error recovery when:
+- Workflows interact with external systems
+- File operations could fail
+- Network calls could timeout
+- User input could be invalid
+- Errors are recoverable
+</when_to_use>
+</error_recovery>

package/.agent/skills/create-agent-skills/templates/router-skill.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+---
+name: {{SKILL_NAME}}
+description: {{What it does}} Use when {{trigger conditions}}.
+---
+
+<essential_principles>
+## {{Core Concept}}
+
+{{Principles that ALWAYS apply, regardless of which workflow runs}}
+
+### 1. {{First principle}}
+{{Explanation}}
+
+### 2. {{Second principle}}
+{{Explanation}}
+
+### 3. {{Third principle}}
+{{Explanation}}
+</essential_principles>
+
+<intake>
+**Ask the user:**
+
+What would you like to do?
+1. {{First option}}
+2. {{Second option}}
+3. {{Third option}}
+
+**Wait for response before proceeding.**
+</intake>
+
+<routing>
+| Response | Workflow |
+|----------|----------|
+| 1, "{{keywords}}" | `workflows/{{first-workflow}}.md` |
+| 2, "{{keywords}}" | `workflows/{{second-workflow}}.md` |
+| 3, "{{keywords}}" | `workflows/{{third-workflow}}.md` |
+
+**After reading the workflow, follow it exactly.**
+</routing>
+
+<quick_reference>
+## {{Skill Name}} Quick Reference
+
+{{Brief reference information always useful to have visible}}
+</quick_reference>
+
+<reference_index>
+## Domain Knowledge
+
+All in `references/`:
+- {{reference-1.md}} - {{purpose}}
+- {{reference-2.md}} - {{purpose}}
+</reference_index>
+
+<workflows_index>
+## Workflows
+
+All in `workflows/`:
+
+| Workflow | Purpose |
+|----------|---------|
+| {{first-workflow}}.md | {{purpose}} |
+| {{second-workflow}}.md | {{purpose}} |
+| {{third-workflow}}.md | {{purpose}} |
+</workflows_index>
+
+<success_criteria>
+A well-executed {{skill name}}:
+- {{First criterion}}
+- {{Second criterion}}
+- {{Third criterion}}
+</success_criteria>