aether-colony 2.0.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Potentially problematic release.


This version of aether-colony might be problematic. Click here for more details.

Files changed (38) hide show
  1. package/.claude/commands/ant/ant.md +89 -0
  2. package/.claude/commands/ant/build.md +504 -0
  3. package/.claude/commands/ant/colonize.md +94 -0
  4. package/.claude/commands/ant/continue.md +674 -0
  5. package/.claude/commands/ant/feedback.md +65 -0
  6. package/.claude/commands/ant/flag.md +108 -0
  7. package/.claude/commands/ant/flags.md +139 -0
  8. package/.claude/commands/ant/focus.md +42 -0
  9. package/.claude/commands/ant/init.md +129 -0
  10. package/.claude/commands/ant/migrate-state.md +140 -0
  11. package/.claude/commands/ant/organize.md +210 -0
  12. package/.claude/commands/ant/pause-colony.md +87 -0
  13. package/.claude/commands/ant/phase.md +86 -0
  14. package/.claude/commands/ant/plan.md +409 -0
  15. package/.claude/commands/ant/redirect.md +53 -0
  16. package/.claude/commands/ant/resume-colony.md +83 -0
  17. package/.claude/commands/ant/status.md +122 -0
  18. package/.claude/commands/ant/watch.md +220 -0
  19. package/LICENSE +21 -0
  20. package/README.md +258 -0
  21. package/bin/cli.js +196 -0
  22. package/package.json +35 -0
  23. package/runtime/DISCIPLINES.md +93 -0
  24. package/runtime/QUEEN_ANT_ARCHITECTURE.md +347 -0
  25. package/runtime/aether-utils.sh +760 -0
  26. package/runtime/coding-standards.md +197 -0
  27. package/runtime/debugging.md +207 -0
  28. package/runtime/docs/pheromones.md +213 -0
  29. package/runtime/learning.md +254 -0
  30. package/runtime/planning.md +159 -0
  31. package/runtime/tdd.md +257 -0
  32. package/runtime/utils/atomic-write.sh +213 -0
  33. package/runtime/utils/colorize-log.sh +132 -0
  34. package/runtime/utils/file-lock.sh +122 -0
  35. package/runtime/utils/watch-spawn-tree.sh +185 -0
  36. package/runtime/verification-loop.md +159 -0
  37. package/runtime/verification.md +116 -0
  38. package/runtime/workers.md +671 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
1
+ # Verification Loop Discipline
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ A comprehensive 6-phase quality check that runs before phase advancement or PR creation. Complements the core Verification Discipline (evidence before claims) with systematic quality gates.
6
+
7
+ ## When to Invoke
8
+
9
+ - After completing a phase (via `/ant:continue`)
10
+ - Before creating a PR
11
+ - After significant refactoring
12
+ - After major changes (every 15 minutes in long sessions)
13
+
14
+ ## The 6 Phases
15
+
16
+ ### Phase 1: Build Verification
17
+
18
+ ```bash
19
+ # Detect and run build command
20
+ npm run build 2>&1 | tail -30
21
+ # OR: pnpm build, cargo build, go build ./..., python -m build
22
+ ```
23
+
24
+ **Gate:** If build fails, STOP. Fix before continuing.
25
+
26
+ ### Phase 2: Type Check
27
+
28
+ ```bash
29
+ # TypeScript
30
+ npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1 | head -30
31
+
32
+ # Python
33
+ pyright . 2>&1 | head -30
34
+
35
+ # Go
36
+ go vet ./... 2>&1 | head -30
37
+ ```
38
+
39
+ **Gate:** Report all type errors. Fix critical ones before continuing.
40
+
41
+ ### Phase 3: Lint Check
42
+
43
+ ```bash
44
+ # JavaScript/TypeScript
45
+ npm run lint 2>&1 | head -30
46
+
47
+ # Python
48
+ ruff check . 2>&1 | head -30
49
+
50
+ # Go
51
+ golangci-lint run 2>&1 | head -30
52
+ ```
53
+
54
+ **Gate:** Report warnings. Fix errors before continuing.
55
+
56
+ ### Phase 4: Test Suite
57
+
58
+ ```bash
59
+ # Run tests with coverage
60
+ npm run test -- --coverage 2>&1 | tail -50
61
+
62
+ # Python
63
+ pytest --cov=. 2>&1 | tail -50
64
+ ```
65
+
66
+ Report:
67
+ - Total tests: X
68
+ - Passed: X
69
+ - Failed: X
70
+ - Coverage: X% (target: 80%+)
71
+
72
+ **Gate:** If tests fail, STOP. Fix before continuing.
73
+
74
+ ### Phase 5: Security Scan
75
+
76
+ ```bash
77
+ # Check for exposed secrets
78
+ grep -rn "sk-\|api_key\|password\s*=" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py" src/ 2>/dev/null | head -10
79
+
80
+ # Check for debug artifacts
81
+ grep -rn "console\.log\|debugger\|TODO.*REMOVE" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.js" src/ 2>/dev/null | head -10
82
+ ```
83
+
84
+ Report:
85
+ - Potential secrets: X
86
+ - Debug artifacts: X
87
+
88
+ **Gate:** Fix exposed secrets immediately. Debug artifacts are warnings.
89
+
90
+ ### Phase 6: Diff Review
91
+
92
+ ```bash
93
+ # Show what changed
94
+ git diff --stat
95
+ git diff HEAD~1 --name-only
96
+ ```
97
+
98
+ Review each changed file for:
99
+ - Unintended changes (files touched that shouldn't be)
100
+ - Missing error handling
101
+ - Potential edge cases
102
+ - Leftover debugging code
103
+
104
+ **Gate:** Review before advancing. Flag concerns.
105
+
106
+ ## Verification Report Format
107
+
108
+ After running all phases, produce a verification report:
109
+
110
+ ```
111
+ VERIFICATION LOOP REPORT
112
+ ========================
113
+
114
+ Phase 1: Build [PASS/FAIL]
115
+ Phase 2: Types [PASS/FAIL] (X errors)
116
+ Phase 3: Lint [PASS/FAIL] (X warnings)
117
+ Phase 4: Tests [PASS/FAIL] (X/Y passed, Z% coverage)
118
+ Phase 5: Security [PASS/FAIL] (X issues)
119
+ Phase 6: Diff [X files changed]
120
+
121
+ Overall: [READY/NOT READY] for advancement
122
+
123
+ Issues to Fix:
124
+ 1. ...
125
+ 2. ...
126
+ ```
127
+
128
+ ## Command Detection
129
+
130
+ Detect project type and commands automatically:
131
+
132
+ | File | Build | Test | Types | Lint |
133
+ |------|-------|------|-------|------|
134
+ | `package.json` | `npm run build` | `npm test` | `npx tsc --noEmit` | `npm run lint` |
135
+ | `Cargo.toml` | `cargo build` | `cargo test` | (built-in) | `cargo clippy` |
136
+ | `go.mod` | `go build ./...` | `go test ./...` | `go vet ./...` | `golangci-lint run` |
137
+ | `pyproject.toml` | `python -m build` | `pytest` | `pyright .` | `ruff check .` |
138
+ | `Makefile` | `make build` | `make test` | (check targets) | `make lint` |
139
+
140
+ ## Skip Conditions
141
+
142
+ If command doesn't exist for project:
143
+ - Skip that phase
144
+ - Note "N/A" in report
145
+ - Don't fail the loop
146
+
147
+ ## Integration with Hooks
148
+
149
+ This discipline provides comprehensive review. Hooks catch issues immediately during development. Use both:
150
+ - Hooks: Real-time feedback
151
+ - Verification Loop: Comprehensive gate before advancement
152
+
153
+ ## Why This Matters
154
+
155
+ - Catches issues before they compound
156
+ - Ensures consistent quality gates
157
+ - Prevents shipping broken code
158
+ - Creates audit trail of verification
159
+ - Builds confidence in phase completion
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
1
+ # Verification Discipline
2
+
3
+ ## The Iron Law
4
+
5
+ ```
6
+ NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
7
+ ```
8
+
9
+ If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
10
+
11
+ ## The Gate Function
12
+
13
+ ```
14
+ BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
15
+
16
+ 1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
17
+ 2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
18
+ 3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
19
+ 4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
20
+ - If NO: State actual status with evidence
21
+ - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
22
+ 5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
23
+
24
+ Skip any step = lying, not verifying
25
+ ```
26
+
27
+ ## Common Failures
28
+
29
+ | Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
30
+ |-------|----------|----------------|
31
+ | Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
32
+ | Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
33
+ | Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
34
+ | Task complete | Success criteria verified | "I wrote the code" |
35
+ | Phase ready | All tasks verified | Prime Worker reports success |
36
+
37
+ ## Red Flags - STOP
38
+
39
+ When you catch yourself:
40
+ - Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
41
+ - Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Done!")
42
+ - About to report completion without running checks
43
+ - Trusting spawn reports without independent verification
44
+ - Relying on partial verification
45
+ - **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**
46
+
47
+ ## Rationalization Prevention
48
+
49
+ | Excuse | Reality |
50
+ |--------|---------|
51
+ | "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
52
+ | "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
53
+ | "Just this once" | No exceptions |
54
+ | "Spawn said success" | Verify independently |
55
+ | "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
56
+
57
+ ## Verification Patterns
58
+
59
+ **Tests:**
60
+ ```
61
+ ✅ [Run test command] → [See: 34/34 pass] → "All tests pass"
62
+ ❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
63
+ ```
64
+
65
+ **Build:**
66
+ ```
67
+ ✅ [Run build] → [See: exit 0] → "Build succeeds"
68
+ ❌ "Code compiles" (without running build)
69
+ ```
70
+
71
+ **Task Completion:**
72
+ ```
73
+ ✅ Re-read success criteria → Verify each with evidence → Report with proof
74
+ ❌ "Tasks done, phase complete"
75
+ ```
76
+
77
+ **Spawn Verification:**
78
+ ```
79
+ ✅ Spawn reports success → Check files exist → Run tests → Report actual state
80
+ ❌ Trust spawn report blindly
81
+ ```
82
+
83
+ ## Phase Advancement Gate
84
+
85
+ Before `/ant:continue` advances to next phase:
86
+
87
+ 1. **Build Check**: Run project build command (if exists)
88
+ 2. **Test Check**: Run test suite, capture pass/fail counts
89
+ 3. **Success Criteria**: Line-by-line verification of phase criteria
90
+ 4. **Evidence Required**: Each criterion needs specific proof
91
+
92
+ ```
93
+ Phase {N} Verification
94
+ ======================
95
+
96
+ Build: {command} → {exit code}
97
+ Tests: {command} → {pass}/{total} ({fail} failures)
98
+
99
+ Success Criteria:
100
+ ✅ Criterion 1: {evidence}
101
+ ✅ Criterion 2: {evidence}
102
+ ❌ Criterion 3: {what's missing}
103
+
104
+ Verdict: PASS / FAIL
105
+ ```
106
+
107
+ If ANY criterion fails verification, phase cannot advance.
108
+
109
+ ## Why This Matters
110
+
111
+ - False completion claims break trust
112
+ - Unverified code ships bugs
113
+ - Time wasted on rework from premature advancement
114
+ - Colony integrity depends on honest reporting
115
+
116
+ **Evidence before claims, always.**