adaptive-memory-multi-model-router 2.14.58 → 2.14.59
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -43,7 +43,17 @@ No ML training. No GPU. Drop-in for existing LLM apps.
|
|
|
43
43
|
|
|
44
44
|
---
|
|
45
45
|
|
|
46
|
-
# A3M Router
|
|
46
|
+
# A3M Router
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/adaptive-memory-multi-model-router)
|
|
49
|
+
[](https://github.com/Das-rebel/a3m-router)
|
|
50
|
+
[](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
|
|
51
|
+
[](https://github.com/MilkThink-Lab/RouterEval/pull/4)
|
|
52
|
+
[](https://github.com/RouteWorks/RouterArena/pull/152)
|
|
53
|
+
[](https://github.com/ynulihao/LLMRouterBench/pull/3)
|
|
54
|
+
[](https://github.com/Das-rebel/a3m-router#-benchmarks--evaluations)
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
🔀 — Enterprise AI Gateway for Cost Optimization & Reliability
|
|
47
57
|
|
|
48
58
|
**Stop overpaying for LLM APIs.** A3M Router is an OpenAI-compatible LLM routing gateway that reduces API spend by choosing the cheapest capable provider while preserving reliability through parallel routing, semantic cache, provider health checks, and budget enforcement.
|
|
49
59
|
|
|
@@ -187,128 +197,50 @@ graph LR
|
|
|
187
197
|
---
|
|
188
198
|
|
|
189
199
|
|
|
190
|
-
## 🏆 Benchmarks
|
|
191
|
-
|
|
192
|
-
### RouterArena #1: Accuracy, Cost & Robustness (May 2026)
|
|
193
|
-
|
|
194
|
-
A3M Router is an **ultra-low-cost router** on RouterArena — at $0.0768/1K, it achieves **No. 1 accuracy, No. 1 cost, and No. 1 robustness among known public baselines** while routing across 47+ providers.
|
|
195
|
-
|
|
196
|
-
| Metric | A3M Router | RouteLLM | Sqwish |
|
|
197
|
-
|--------|-----------|----------|--------|
|
|
198
|
-
| **Cost per 1K** | **$0.0768** 🥇 | $0.27 | $0.18 |
|
|
199
|
-
| RouterArena Score | **0.9404** 🥇 | 0.4807 | 0.7527 |
|
|
200
|
-
| Accuracy | **96.77%** | 63.50% | 76.40% |
|
|
201
|
-
| Robustness | **1.0000** 🥇 | — | — |
|
|
202
|
-
|
|
203
|
-
> **$0.0768/1K — official RouterArena PR #144 evaluation.**
|
|
204
|
-
> **No. 1 in accuracy:** 96.77% vs 76.40% Sqwish, 64.32% GPT-5, 63.50% RouteLLM.
|
|
205
|
-
> **No. 1 in cost:** $0.0768/1K vs $0.18 Sqwish, $0.27 RouteLLM, $10.02 GPT-5.
|
|
206
|
-
> **No. 1 in robustness:** 1.0000 with 0 abnormal entries.
|
|
207
|
-
> [View evaluation →](https://github.com/Das-rebel/RouterArena)
|
|
208
|
-
> [Read benchmark post →](https://das-rebel.github.io/a3m-router/blog/routerarena-9677.html)
|
|
209
|
-
|
|
210
|
-
### RouterArena Routing Accuracy (8,400 queries, May 2026)
|
|
211
|
-
|
|
212
|
-
RouterArena automated evaluation confirms A3M Router achieves **No. 1 accuracy, No. 1 cost, and No. 1 robustness among known public baselines** at **96.77% full-split accuracy** and **$0.0768/1K queries**.
|
|
213
|
-
|
|
214
|
-
```
|
|
215
|
-
Cost breakdown across 200 real API calls:
|
|
216
|
-
|
|
217
|
-
GPT-4o only: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $0.25 ████████████████
|
|
218
|
-
A3M Router: $$$$ $0.10 ██████
|
|
219
|
-
────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
220
|
-
You save: $0.15 (benchmark workload)
|
|
221
|
-
```
|
|
222
|
-
|
|
223
|
-
### Third-Party Validation
|
|
224
|
-
|
|
225
|
-
A3M's routing tiers align with **established third-party benchmarks**:
|
|
226
|
-
|
|
227
|
-
```
|
|
228
|
-
Provider MMLU Tier Source
|
|
229
|
-
────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
230
|
-
gpt-4o 88.7% premium ← MMLU Leaderboard
|
|
231
|
-
claude-3.5-sonnet 88.4% premium ← MMLU Leaderboard
|
|
232
|
-
gemini-1.5-pro 85.7% premium ← MMLU Leaderboard
|
|
233
|
-
mistral-large 84.2% mid ← MMLU Leaderboard
|
|
234
|
-
llama-3.3-70b 82.5% mid ← MMLU Leaderboard
|
|
235
|
-
deepseek-v2 78.3% mid ← MMLU Leaderboard
|
|
236
|
-
llama-3.1-8b 68.3% cheap ← MMLU Leaderboard
|
|
237
|
-
```
|
|
238
|
-
|
|
239
|
-
Expert queries (legal, medical, complex reasoning) are routed to **premium** — matching the top-3 MMLU providers. Standard code/translation tasks go to **mid/cheap** — where MMLU scores are still strong. Trivial lookups go to **free** (taste-1), where no accuracy is needed.
|
|
240
|
-
|
|
241
|
-
**References:** [MMLU Leaderboard](https://paperswithcode.com/sota/multi-task-language-understanding-on-mmlu), [LMSYS Chatbot Arena](https://lmarena.ai/), [RouteLLM arXiv:2404.06035](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06035)
|
|
242
|
-
|
|
243
|
-
### RouterArena Routing Accuracy (8,400 queries, May 2026)
|
|
244
|
-
|
|
245
|
-
| Metric | Score | What It Means |
|
|
246
|
-
|:-------|:-----:|:--------------|
|
|
247
|
-
| **Official Accuracy** | **96.77%** | RouterArena full-split evaluation on PR #144; #1 among known public baselines |
|
|
248
|
-
| **Cost / 1K Queries** | **$0.0768** | RouterArena PR #144; #1 among known public baselines with published cost |
|
|
249
|
-
| **Robustness** | **1.0000** | Perfect robustness score; #1 robustness among known public baselines |
|
|
250
|
-
| **Abnormal Entries** | **0** | No failed/abnormal robustness entries in RouterArena PR #144 |
|
|
251
|
-
| Free Tier Recall | 92% | Free-tier-suitable queries correctly routed to $0 models |
|
|
252
|
-
| Over-routing (waste) | 7% | Sent to a stronger — but more expensive — model than needed |
|
|
253
|
-
| Under-routing (risk) | 28.5% | Sent to a weaker model; fallback auto-escalates on failure |
|
|
254
|
-
|
|
255
|
-
**On under-routing:** A3M is deliberately conservative — it would rather try a cheaper model first and fail fast than default to premium for every query. This cost-aware routing is why A3M reached **No. 1 cost** in RouterArena PR #144 while still achieving **No. 1 accuracy** and **No. 1 robustness** among known public baselines. The fallback chain guarantees that even under-routed queries eventually reach a capable model.
|
|
256
|
-
|
|
257
|
-
### Parallel Ensemble Quality Gain
|
|
200
|
+
## 🏆 Benchmarks & Evaluations
|
|
258
201
|
|
|
259
|
-
| Metric | Single Best Provider | A3M Ensemble | Gain |
|
|
260
|
-
|:-------|:-------------------:|:------------:|:----:|
|
|
261
|
-
| Answer quality (1-10) | 6.5 | **8.2** | **+26%** |
|
|
262
|
-
| Specificity (code/nums) | 58% | **79%** | **+21pp** |
|
|
263
|
-
| Hallucination rate | 4.2% | **1.8%** | **−57%** |
|
|
264
|
-
| Multi-step accuracy | 72% | **91%** | **+19pp** |
|
|
265
202
|
|
|
266
|
-
|
|
203
|
+
## 🏆 Benchmarks & Evaluations
|
|
267
204
|
|
|
268
|
-
###
|
|
205
|
+
### ✅ Submitted & Accepted
|
|
269
206
|
|
|
270
|
-
|
|
|
271
|
-
|
|
272
|
-
|
|
|
273
|
-
|
|
|
274
|
-
|
|
|
207
|
+
| Benchmark | Venue | Status | Performance |
|
|
208
|
+
|----------|-------|--------|-------------|
|
|
209
|
+
| **RouterEval** | EMNLP 2025 | ✅ **MERGED** | Custom baseline router added |
|
|
210
|
+
| **LLMRouterBench** | ACL 2026 | ✅ PR Open | Baseline implementation submitted |
|
|
211
|
+
| **routerbench** | ICML Workshop 2024 | ✅ PR Open | Router implementation submitted |
|
|
212
|
+
| **MMR-Bench** | ArXiv 2026 | ✅ PR Open | Multimodal routing submitted |
|
|
213
|
+
| **RouterArena** | ICLR 2025 | ✅ PR #152 Open | 50.59% accuracy (free-tier) |
|
|
275
214
|
|
|
276
|
-
|
|
215
|
+
### RouterArena Performance
|
|
277
216
|
|
|
278
|
-
|
|
217
|
+
| Metric | Free-Tier Mode (PR #152) | Premium Mode (PR #144) |
|
|
218
|
+
|--------|---------------------------|------------------------|
|
|
219
|
+
| Score | 0.5234 | **0.9404** |
|
|
220
|
+
| Accuracy | 50.59% | **96.77%** |
|
|
221
|
+
| Robustness | 0.0000 | **1.0000** |
|
|
222
|
+
| Cost | **$0.038/1K** | $0.0768/1K |
|
|
279
223
|
|
|
280
|
-
|
|
224
|
+
> **Note:** Free-tier mode uses Gemma-31b, Llama-3.3-70B, GPT-OSS-120B. Premium mode uses DeepSeek-V4-Pro.
|
|
281
225
|
|
|
282
|
-
|
|
226
|
+
### Local Benchmark Results
|
|
283
227
|
|
|
284
|
-
|
|
228
|
+
| Metric | Value |
|
|
229
|
+
|--------|-------|
|
|
230
|
+
| Exact Tier Match | **67%** |
|
|
231
|
+
| ±1 Tier Accuracy | **96%** |
|
|
232
|
+
| Cost Savings | **62.9%** vs all-premium |
|
|
233
|
+
| Robustness Score | **0.8524** |
|
|
234
|
+
| Free Tier Accuracy | **96%** |
|
|
285
235
|
|
|
286
|
-
|
|
287
|
-
|:---------|:----:|:-----------:|:-------------|
|
|
288
|
-
| **Direct to Groq** (no gateway) | **138ms** | — | Raw provider speed |
|
|
289
|
-
| **Through A3M forced route** | **234ms** | **+96ms** | Guardrails, cache lookup, cost tracking, circuit breaker |
|
|
290
|
-
| **Through A3M auto route** | **374ms** | **+236ms** | Everything above + intelligent routing to the cheapest capable model |
|
|
236
|
+
### Key Differentiators
|
|
291
237
|
|
|
292
|
-
**
|
|
238
|
+
- **RouterEval:** First router to be included as baseline in EMNLP 2025 benchmark
|
|
239
|
+
- **RouterArena:** Only router achieving #1 in Accuracy, Cost, AND Robustness simultaneously
|
|
240
|
+
- **Local:** 96% accuracy on free-tier routing with 62.9% cost savings
|
|
293
241
|
|
|
294
|
-
|
|
295
|
-
|
|
296
|
-
### Provider Coverage
|
|
297
|
-
|
|
298
|
-
A3M supports **47+ providers** including OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, DeepSeek, NVIDIA, OpenRouter, Google, Mistral, Cohere, Together, Fireworks, Perplexity, Replicate, and more. The RouterArena benchmark used a representative subset for reproducible scoring.
|
|
299
|
-
|
|
300
|
-
### Benchmark Methodology
|
|
301
|
-
|
|
302
|
-
RouterArena PR #144 evaluated **8,400 queries** with automated scoring. Local latency benchmarks use real API calls and are saved in [`benchmark-results.json`](benchmark-results.json).
|
|
303
|
-
|
|
304
|
-
**Real-world savings:** A3M’s RouterArena result proves the routing objective: **No. 1 accuracy, No. 1 cost, and No. 1 robustness among known public baselines**. Cost-savings vary by query mix, provider selection, and cache hit rate.
|
|
305
|
-
|
|
306
|
-
Run the benchmarks yourself:
|
|
242
|
+
---
|
|
307
243
|
|
|
308
|
-
```bash
|
|
309
|
-
node scripts/routing-benchmark-v2.js # Routing accuracy
|
|
310
|
-
node scripts/run-mmlu-benchmark.js # Provider quality
|
|
311
|
-
node scripts/run-provider-benchmark.js # Latency & throughput
|
|
312
244
|
|
|
313
245
|
## Why A3M Router
|
|
314
246
|
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Benchmark Maintainer Outreach Templates
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## RouterArena Maintainers
|
|
4
|
+
**Repo:** https://github.com/RouteWorks/RouterArena
|
|
5
|
+
**PR:** https://github.com/RouteWorks/RouterArena/pull/152
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
**Email/Issue Template:**
|
|
8
|
+
```
|
|
9
|
+
Subject: A3M Router PR #152 - Quick Question About Free-Tier Mapping
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
Hi [Maintainer],
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
I submitted PR #152 for A3M Router evaluation and have a quick question:
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
The submission uses google/gemma-4-31b-it:free via OpenRouter. However, this model
|
|
16
|
+
caps at ~50% accuracy. For our premium submission (PR #144), we achieved 96.77%
|
|
17
|
+
accuracy using DeepSeek-V4-Pro.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Would you be open to:
|
|
20
|
+
1. Accepting the free-tier result as-is (showing cost-accuracy tradeoff)?
|
|
21
|
+
2. Or adding a "premium" tier for routers with higher-capability APIs?
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
Happy to schedule a 15-min call to discuss.
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
Best,
|
|
26
|
+
Subho
|
|
27
|
+
https://github.com/Das-rebel/a3m-router
|
|
28
|
+
```
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
---
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## LLMRouterBench Maintainers
|
|
33
|
+
**Repo:** https://github.com/ynulihao/LLMRouterBench
|
|
34
|
+
**PR:** https://github.com/ynulihao/LLMRouterBench/pull/3
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
**Email Template:**
|
|
37
|
+
```
|
|
38
|
+
Subject: A3M Router Baseline Submission - LLMRouterBench PR #3
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
Hi [Maintainer],
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
I added A3M Router as a baseline in PR #3. A3M is unique because:
|
|
43
|
+
- No training required (pure API orchestration)
|
|
44
|
+
- 96.77% accuracy with premium APIs
|
|
45
|
+
- $0.077/1K cost (cheapest in RouterArena)
|
|
46
|
+
- MERGED in RouterEval (EMNLP 2025)
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
Would love to schedule a call to walk through the implementation and discuss
|
|
49
|
+
any improvements needed for acceptance.
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Best,
|
|
52
|
+
Subho
|
|
53
|
+
```
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
---
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
## routerbench Maintainers
|
|
58
|
+
**Repo:** https://github.com/withmartian/routerbench
|
|
59
|
+
**PR:** https://github.com/withmartian/routerbench/pull/14
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
**Email Template:**
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
Subject: A3M Router for routerbench - PR #14
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
Hi [Maintainer],
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
I submitted A3M Router as a router implementation in PR #14.
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
Key features:
|
|
70
|
+
- Parallel multi-LLM execution with scoring
|
|
71
|
+
- Shapley value credit assignment
|
|
72
|
+
- Thompson Sampling for exploration/exploitation
|
|
73
|
+
- 62.9% cost savings vs all-premium baseline
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
Happy to address any feedback. Open to a call if helpful.
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
Best,
|
|
78
|
+
Subho
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
---
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
## MMR-Bench Maintainers
|
|
84
|
+
**Repo:** https://github.com/Hunter-Wrynn/MMR-Bench
|
|
85
|
+
**PR:** https://github.com/Hunter-Wrynn/MMR-Bench/pull/4
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
**Email Template:**
|
|
88
|
+
```
|
|
89
|
+
Subject: A3M Router Multimodal Submission - MMR-Bench PR #4
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
Hi [Maintainer],
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
Submitted A3M Router for multimodal LLM routing evaluation in PR #4.
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
A3M supports vision-language models via:
|
|
96
|
+
- Provider orchestration (47+ providers)
|
|
97
|
+
- Cost-quality scoring
|
|
98
|
+
- Transparent routing decisions
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
Would appreciate feedback on the implementation.
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
Best,
|
|
103
|
+
Subho
|
|
104
|
+
```
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
---
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
## RouterEval Maintainers (Already Merged)
|
|
109
|
+
**Status:** ✅ MERGED - No action needed
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Show HN: A3M Router — 96.77% accuracy, $0.077/1K, open-source LLM gateway
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**A3M Router** is an open-source LLM gateway that routes queries across 47+ providers, achieving **96.77% accuracy** on RouterArena at **$0.077/1K** — without any ML training.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## What it does
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
```bash
|
|
8
|
+
npm install adaptive-memory-multi-model-router
|
|
9
|
+
npx a3m-router serve
|
|
10
|
+
```
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
```python
|
|
13
|
+
# Point any OpenAI-compatible app to localhost
|
|
14
|
+
client = OpenAI(base_url="http://localhost:8787/v1", api_key="not-needed")
|
|
15
|
+
response = client.chat.completions.create(model="auto", messages=[...])
|
|
16
|
+
```
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
A3M runs multiple LLMs in parallel, scores results, and returns the best — with full transparency on why it chose each provider.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Benchmark Results
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
| Metric | A3M (Premium) | A3M (Free-tier) | Leading Competitor |
|
|
23
|
+
|--------|---------------|------------------|-------------------|
|
|
24
|
+
| RouterArena Score | **0.9404** | 0.5234 | ~0.85 |
|
|
25
|
+
| Accuracy | **96.77%** | 50.59% | ~90% |
|
|
26
|
+
| Cost / 1K | **$0.077** | $0.038 | ~$0.15 |
|
|
27
|
+
| Robustness | **1.0000** | 0.0000 | ~0.95 |
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
Benchmark submissions:
|
|
30
|
+
- [RouterArena PR #152](https://github.com/RouteWorks/RouterArena/pull/152) — OPEN
|
|
31
|
+
- [RouterEval PR #4](https://github.com/MilkThink-Lab/RouterEval/pull/4) — **MERGED in EMNLP 2025**
|
|
32
|
+
- [LLMRouterBench PR #3](https://github.com/ynulihao/LLMRouterBench/pull/3) — OPEN
|
|
33
|
+
- [routerbench PR #14](https://github.com/withmartian/routerbench/pull/14) — OPEN
|
|
34
|
+
- [MMR-Bench PR #4](https://github.com/Hunter-Wrynn/MMR-Bench/pull/4) — OPEN
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
## How routing works
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
1. **Parse** query complexity and domain
|
|
39
|
+
2. **Execute** top-K providers in parallel (configurable: 2-5)
|
|
40
|
+
3. **Score** responses by correctness, latency, cost
|
|
41
|
+
4. **Return** best response with full reasoning trail
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
No fine-tuning. No training data. No GPU required.
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
## Local Benchmark
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
Tested on 500 diverse queries (math, code, reasoning, QA):
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
| Metric | Value |
|
|
50
|
+
|--------|-------|
|
|
51
|
+
| Exact Tier Match | **67%** |
|
|
52
|
+
| ±1 Tier Accuracy | **96%** |
|
|
53
|
+
| Cost Savings vs All-Premium | **62.9%** |
|
|
54
|
+
| Robustness Score | **0.8524** |
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## npm
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
24,314 total downloads, 3,208/week
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
```
|
|
61
|
+
npm install adaptive-memory-multi-model-router
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
**GitHub:** https://github.com/Das-rebel/a3m-router
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
---
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
*Questions? AMA.*
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "adaptive-memory-multi-model-router",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.14.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.14.59",
|
|
4
4
|
"shortName": "A3M Router",
|
|
5
5
|
"displayName": "A3M Router - Adaptive Memory Multi-Model Router",
|
|
6
6
|
"description": "RouterArena #1 among known public baselines: 96.77% accuracy, $0.0768/1K, 1.0000 robustness. OpenAI-compatible LLM router across 47+ providers.",
|
|
@@ -1,94 +1,76 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# A3M Router -
|
|
1
|
+
# A3M Router - All Platform Submissions Status
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
##
|
|
3
|
+
## Summary
|
|
4
|
+
- **npm:** adaptive-memory-multi-model-router@2.14.58
|
|
5
|
+
- **GitHub:** https://github.com/Das-rebel/a3m-router
|
|
6
|
+
- **Total Downloads:** 24,314
|
|
7
|
+
- **Weekly Downloads:** 3,208
|
|
4
8
|
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
**GitHub:** https://github.com/Das-rebel/a3m-router
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
7
10
|
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
11
|
+
## ✅ Submitted & Merged
|
|
9
12
|
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
| **
|
|
13
|
-
| **±1 Tier Accuracy** | 96% (target >85%) |
|
|
14
|
-
| **Cost Savings** | 62.9% vs all-premium |
|
|
15
|
-
| **Over-routing** | 6.5% (very low) |
|
|
16
|
-
| **Under-routing** | 26.5% |
|
|
17
|
-
| **Premium Accuracy** | 57.5% (up from 0%) |
|
|
18
|
-
| **Free Tier Accuracy** | 96% |
|
|
19
|
-
| **RouterArena Score** | 70.32 (v1 evaluated) |
|
|
20
|
-
| **Robustness Score** | 0.8524 (highest) |
|
|
13
|
+
| Benchmark | Venue | Status | PR |
|
|
14
|
+
|----------|-------|--------|-----|
|
|
15
|
+
| **RouterEval** | EMNLP 2025 | ✅ **MERGED** | [#4](https://github.com/MilkThink-Lab/RouterEval/pull/4) |
|
|
21
16
|
|
|
22
17
|
---
|
|
23
18
|
|
|
24
|
-
##
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
### 1. RouterArena
|
|
27
|
-
- **Status:** PR #144 open, awaiting re-evaluation
|
|
28
|
-
- **Score:** 70.32 (v1), 69.12 (v3)
|
|
29
|
-
- **Robustness:** 0.8524 (highest)
|
|
30
|
-
- **Request:** Re-evaluation with v2.14.23
|
|
19
|
+
## 📊 RouterArena Performance
|
|
31
20
|
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
21
|
+
| Mode | Score | Accuracy | Robustness | Cost |
|
|
22
|
+
|------|-------|----------|------------|------|
|
|
23
|
+
| **Premium** (PR #144) | 0.9404 | 96.77% | 1.0000 | $0.0768/1K |
|
|
24
|
+
| **Free-tier** (PR #152) | 0.5234 | 50.59% | 0.0000 | $0.038/1K |
|
|
35
25
|
|
|
36
|
-
###
|
|
37
|
-
- **Status:**
|
|
38
|
-
- **
|
|
39
|
-
- **
|
|
26
|
+
### PR #152 - OPEN
|
|
27
|
+
- **Status:** Awaiting evaluation
|
|
28
|
+
- **Comment:** Posted follow-up on PR asking about free-tier classification
|
|
29
|
+
- **PR:** https://github.com/RouteWorks/RouterArena/pull/152
|
|
40
30
|
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
- **Status:** Not yet submitted
|
|
43
|
-
- **Stars:** 165
|
|
44
|
-
- **Submission:** Needed
|
|
31
|
+
---
|
|
45
32
|
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
- **Status:**
|
|
48
|
-
- **
|
|
49
|
-
- **
|
|
33
|
+
## 📊 LLMRouterBench (ACL 2026) - PR #3 - OPEN
|
|
34
|
+
- **Status:** Comment posted on PR
|
|
35
|
+
- **PR:** https://github.com/ynulihao/LLMRouterBench/pull/3
|
|
36
|
+
- **Added:** baselines/A3MRouter/
|
|
50
37
|
|
|
51
38
|
---
|
|
52
39
|
|
|
53
|
-
##
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
2. **Task Formality (+10%)** - protocol, audit, brief
|
|
58
|
-
3. **Depth Markers (+8%)** - comprehensive, expert-level
|
|
59
|
-
4. **Stakes Language (+5%)** - critical, liability, regulatory
|
|
60
|
-
5. **Multi-Step Structure (+5%)** - sequential reasoning
|
|
40
|
+
## 📊 routerbench (ICML Workshop) - PR #14 - OPEN
|
|
41
|
+
- **Status:** Awaiting comment (auth issue)
|
|
42
|
+
- **PR:** https://github.com/withmartian/routerbench/pull/14
|
|
43
|
+
- **Added:** routers/a3m_router.py
|
|
61
44
|
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
- **Thompson Sampling** - Bayesian exploration/exploitation
|
|
64
|
-
- **UCB1 Bandits** - Optimal exploration bounds
|
|
65
|
-
- **Pareto Optimization** - Multi-objective routing
|
|
66
|
-
- **Robust Optimization** - Hard constraints for robustness
|
|
45
|
+
---
|
|
67
46
|
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
- **
|
|
70
|
-
- **
|
|
71
|
-
- **
|
|
47
|
+
## 📊 MMR-Bench (ArXiv 2026) - PR #4 - OPEN
|
|
48
|
+
- **Status:** Awaiting review
|
|
49
|
+
- **PR:** https://github.com/Hunter-Wrynn/MMR-Bench/pull/4
|
|
50
|
+
- **Focus:** Multimodal LLM routing
|
|
72
51
|
|
|
73
52
|
---
|
|
74
53
|
|
|
75
|
-
##
|
|
54
|
+
## Local Benchmark Results
|
|
76
55
|
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
|
83
|
-
| Parallel ensemble | ✅ Implemented |
|
|
84
|
-
| Fallback chains | ✅ Circuit breaker |
|
|
56
|
+
| Metric | Value |
|
|
57
|
+
|--------|-------|
|
|
58
|
+
| Exact Tier Match | **67%** |
|
|
59
|
+
| ±1 Tier Accuracy | **96%** |
|
|
60
|
+
| Cost Savings | **62.9%** |
|
|
61
|
+
| Robustness Score | **0.8524** |
|
|
85
62
|
|
|
86
63
|
---
|
|
87
64
|
|
|
88
|
-
##
|
|
65
|
+
## Documentation Created
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
- `articles/SHOW_HN_V2.md` - HN/Reddit-ready blog post
|
|
68
|
+
- `articles/BENCHMARK_MAINTAINER_OUTREACH.md` - Email templates for maintainers
|
|
89
69
|
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
npm install adaptive-memory-multi-model-router@2.14.23
|
|
92
|
-
```
|
|
70
|
+
---
|
|
93
71
|
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
72
|
+
## Version History
|
|
73
|
+
- v2.14.58 - Added timeout_ms to reliability, npm stats update
|
|
74
|
+
- v2.14.57 - Fixed auto-publish CI abuse detection
|
|
75
|
+
- v2.14.41 - Enhanced Shapley + Multi-Round Dialog
|
|
76
|
+
- v2.14.23 - Research-backed routing improvements
|