@zonease/aiworker-cli 0.13.2 → 0.14.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: candidate-profile
3
+ description: Build and update a source-backed Candidate People Profile for hiring review.
4
+ capabilities:
5
+ - hr-profile
6
+ - recruiting
7
+ - evidence-review
8
+ ---
9
+
10
+ # Candidate Profile
11
+
12
+ Use this skill when the workspace profile represents a candidate or candidate
13
+ pool member.
14
+
15
+ ## Profile Contract
16
+
17
+ - Treat `README.md` as the accepted Candidate Profile.
18
+ - Treat files under `artifacts/` as proposed profile changes until review.
19
+ - Keep confirmed facts, missing evidence, weak signals, and next HR actions
20
+ separate.
21
+ - Do not infer protected-class attributes, personal judgments, or employment
22
+ commitments.
23
+
24
+ ## Output Shape
25
+
26
+ For proposed updates, write a markdown artifact with:
27
+
28
+ 1. Current candidate summary
29
+ 2. Role-relevant evidence
30
+ 3. Missing or conflicting evidence
31
+ 4. Hiring risks and compliance notes
32
+ 5. Human reviewer next actions
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: evidence-screening
3
+ description: Screen HR evidence for source quality, role relevance, missing facts, and risk.
4
+ capabilities:
5
+ - hr-evidence
6
+ - candidate-screen
7
+ - risk-review
8
+ ---
9
+
10
+ # Evidence Screening
11
+
12
+ Use this skill to evaluate resumes, ATS packets, interview notes, employee
13
+ records, or lifecycle touchpoints before they influence a People Profile.
14
+
15
+ ## Screening Standard
16
+
17
+ - Tie every positive or negative signal to source evidence.
18
+ - Mark weak, stale, missing, or conflicting evidence explicitly.
19
+ - Separate role-related criteria from unsupported personal judgments.
20
+ - Keep raw sensitive evidence out of durable profile history unless reviewed.
21
+ - Prefer descriptor references over copying private evidence bodies.
22
+
23
+ ## Output Shape
24
+
25
+ Create an evidence matrix with:
26
+
27
+ 1. Evidence source
28
+ 2. Role or lifecycle relevance
29
+ 3. Confidence
30
+ 4. Missing information
31
+ 5. Risk note
32
+ 6. Recommended human follow-up
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: hiring-risk-review
3
+ description: Review HR profile proposals for compliance, privacy, bias, and unsupported claims.
4
+ capabilities:
5
+ - hiring-risk
6
+ - compliance-review
7
+ - privacy-review
8
+ ---
9
+
10
+ # Hiring Risk Review
11
+
12
+ Use this skill before a proposed HR artifact is promoted into the accepted
13
+ People Profile.
14
+
15
+ ## Risk Review Rules
16
+
17
+ - Flag protected-class inference, proxy signals, and unsupported personal
18
+ judgments.
19
+ - Flag copied sensitive evidence that should stay behind a descriptor or source
20
+ reference.
21
+ - Flag employment commitments, compensation claims, or hiring decisions that are
22
+ not explicitly human-approved.
23
+ - Separate blocking risks from advisory improvements.
24
+
25
+ ## Output Shape
26
+
27
+ Return:
28
+
29
+ 1. Verdict recommendation: pass, warn, fail, or needs_review
30
+ 2. Blocking findings
31
+ 3. Advisory findings
32
+ 4. Privacy and evidence retention notes
33
+ 5. Required human decision before profile promotion
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: interview-brief
3
+ description: Draft evidence-backed interview briefs, focus areas, and scorecard guidance.
4
+ capabilities:
5
+ - interview-planning
6
+ - recruiting
7
+ - scorecard
8
+ ---
9
+
10
+ # Interview Brief
11
+
12
+ Use this skill when preparing an interview plan from a Candidate Profile or
13
+ candidate evidence packet.
14
+
15
+ ## Interview Guidance
16
+
17
+ - Use role-relevant evidence and open questions from the profile.
18
+ - Turn weak or missing evidence into interview focus areas.
19
+ - Avoid protected-class inference and unsupported personal conclusions.
20
+ - Keep the final hiring decision explicitly human-owned.
21
+
22
+ ## Output Shape
23
+
24
+ Draft:
25
+
26
+ 1. Interview objective
27
+ 2. Evidence-backed focus areas
28
+ 3. Questions mapped to role criteria
29
+ 4. Scorecard guidance
30
+ 5. Risks or missing evidence to verify
31
+ 6. Reviewer notes for the human panel
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: profile-update-proposal
3
+ description: Convert HR session evidence into a reviewable profile update proposal.
4
+ capabilities:
5
+ - hr-profile
6
+ - artifact-proposal
7
+ - review-prep
8
+ ---
9
+
10
+ # Profile Update Proposal
11
+
12
+ Use this skill when a session should produce a proposed change for the accepted
13
+ People Profile.
14
+
15
+ ## Rules
16
+
17
+ - Read `README.md` first to understand the accepted profile baseline.
18
+ - Write proposed changes under `artifacts/<sessionId>/`.
19
+ - Do not update `README.md` directly unless the operator explicitly asks for a
20
+ reviewed profile revision workflow.
21
+ - Preserve source references, open questions, and human decision ownership.
22
+
23
+ ## Proposal Checklist
24
+
25
+ - What changed since the accepted profile?
26
+ - Which claims are backed by explicit evidence?
27
+ - Which facts are still missing?
28
+ - Which risks need HR or legal review?
29
+ - What exact review decision is needed before promotion?
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@zonease/aiworker-cli",
3
- "version": "0.13.2",
3
+ "version": "0.14.0",
4
4
  "description": "AIWorker CLI — local Host and vertical Soul workspace runtime",
5
5
  "license": "MIT",
6
6
  "type": "module",