@zkproofport-app/sdk 0.4.3 → 0.5.0-beta.0

package/dist/circuits.d.ts

@@ -1,236 +1 @@
-/**
- * Canonical ZKProofport circuit identifiers.
- *
- * This module is the single source of truth for circuit IDs. Every other layer
- * — the mobile app, the demo, the relay, server-side provers — reads its list
- * from here instead of keeping a private copy that silently drifts.
- *
- * It has **no imports and no dependencies**, so it can be pulled in on its own:
- *
- * ```typescript
- * import { CIRCUIT_IDS, isCircuitId } from '@zkproofport-app/sdk/circuits';
- * ```
- *
- * The same names are also re-exported from the package root
- * (`@zkproofport-app/sdk`) for callers that already import the SDK.
- *
- * ## Identifiers are canonical and case-sensitive
- *
- * Each ID is the circuit's `name` in its `Nargo.toml`, verbatim. The format is
- * lowercase with underscores. Hyphenated spellings (`coinbase-kyc`,
- * `mdl-kr-age`) are directory or UI route names in other repositories — they
- * are **not** circuit IDs, and passing one produces a nullifier mismatch or a
- * failed on-chain lookup rather than a clear error.
- */
-/**
- * Whether a circuit is officially supported today or still on the roadmap.
- *
- * - `supported` — generally available. Safe to build a product on.
- * - `planned` — the identifier is reserved and the circuit exists, but it is
- *   not officially supported yet. Availability, inputs and public-input layout
- *   may change without a major version bump.
- */
-export type CircuitSupportStatus = 'supported' | 'experimental' | 'planned';
-/**
- * Canonical circuit identifiers, keyed by a stable constant name.
- *
- * Prefer these constants over string literals so a rename is a compile error
- * rather than a runtime surprise.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * import { CIRCUIT_IDS } from '@zkproofport-app/sdk/circuits';
- *
- * const relay = await sdk.createRelayRequest(CIRCUIT_IDS.COINBASE_ATTESTATION, {
- *   scope: 'myapp.com',
- * });
- * ```
- */
-export declare const CIRCUIT_IDS: Readonly<{
-    /** Coinbase KYC attestation. Officially supported. */
-    readonly COINBASE_ATTESTATION: "coinbase_attestation";
-    /** Coinbase country attestation (inclusion / exclusion). Officially supported. */
-    readonly COINBASE_COUNTRY_ATTESTATION: "coinbase_country_attestation";
-    /** OIDC email-domain attestation. Officially supported. */
-    readonly OIDC_DOMAIN_ATTESTATION: "oidc_domain_attestation";
-    /** GIWA attestation. Planned — not officially supported yet. */
-    readonly GIWA_ATTESTATION: "giwa_attestation";
-    /** Dojang Playground on GIWA Sepolia. Experimental — testnet only. */
-    readonly DOJANG_PLAYGROUND: "dojang_playground";
-    /** Korea Mobile ID ownership. Planned — not officially supported yet. */
-    readonly MDL_KR_OWNERSHIP: "mdl_kr_ownership";
-    /** Korea Mobile ID age threshold. Planned — not officially supported yet. */
-    readonly MDL_KR_AGE: "mdl_kr_age";
-    /** Korea Mobile ID si/do region. Planned — not officially supported yet. */
-    readonly MDL_KR_REGION: "mdl_kr_region";
-}>;
-/**
- * Union of every canonical circuit identifier.
- *
- * `CircuitType` (exported from the package root) is an alias of this type — the
- * two names refer to the same union, and this module is where it is defined.
- */
-export type CircuitId = (typeof CIRCUIT_IDS)[keyof typeof CIRCUIT_IDS];
-/**
- * Support status for every circuit.
- *
- * The record is exhaustive over {@link CircuitId}: adding an identifier without
- * giving it a status is a compile error, so this list cannot drift from
- * {@link CIRCUIT_IDS}.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * import { CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS } from '@zkproofport-app/sdk/circuits';
- *
- * CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS.coinbase_attestation; // 'supported'
- * CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS.mdl_kr_age;           // 'planned'
- * ```
- */
-export declare const CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS: Readonly<Record<CircuitId, CircuitSupportStatus>>;
-/**
- * Where each circuit's verification key FILE lives inside the
- * `zkproofport/circuits` repository, relative to its root.
- *
- * Off-chain verification needs the verification key and nothing else — no
- * circuit bytecode, no witness. The key is public by nature: it is what anyone
- * checking a proof must already have, and the Solidity verifiers deployed
- * on-chain embed the same key.
- *
- * NOTE THE TRAILING `/vk` TWICE. In that repository `target/vk` is a DIRECTORY
- * holding `vk`, `vk_hash` and `SHA256SUMS`; the key itself is `target/vk/vk`.
- * These paths were first copied here from the mobile app, which keeps the
- * directory and the filename as two fields and joins them — so taking only the
- * directory produced a URL that answers 404, and the first browser to try
- * off-chain verification said "Could not fetch the verification key (HTTP 404)".
- *
- * Exhaustive over {@link CircuitId} on purpose. A new circuit whose key path is
- * not listed here fails to compile rather than failing at verification time,
- * where the only symptom would be a proof that cannot be checked.
- */
-export declare const CIRCUIT_VK_PATHS: Readonly<Record<CircuitId, string>>;
-/**
- * Every canonical circuit identifier, in declaration order.
- *
- * Includes circuits that are still `planned`. Use {@link SUPPORTED_CIRCUIT_IDS}
- * when you only want the ones that are officially supported today.
- */
-export declare const ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS: readonly CircuitId[];
-/**
- * Circuits that are officially supported today: the two Coinbase circuits and
- * OIDC domain attestation.
- *
- * Derived from {@link CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS}, so it cannot fall out of sync.
- */
-export declare const SUPPORTED_CIRCUIT_IDS: readonly CircuitId[];
-/**
- * Circuits whose identifiers are reserved but which are not officially
- * supported yet: GIWA attestation and the three Korea Mobile ID circuits.
- *
- * Derived from {@link CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS}, so it cannot fall out of sync.
- */
-/**
- * Circuits you can prove today, on a testnet, with everything subject to change.
- *
- * `giwa_attestation` is in this state. Calling it `planned` would be wrong —
- * the circuit compiles, the verifier is deployed and a proof verifies against
- * it — and calling it `supported` would be worse, because the only deployment
- * is a testnet (GIWA Sepolia). Neither existing word was true, so the honest
- * move was a third word rather than picking the closer lie.
- */
-export declare const EXPERIMENTAL_CIRCUIT_IDS: readonly CircuitId[];
-export declare const PLANNED_CIRCUIT_IDS: readonly CircuitId[];
-/**
- * Narrows an unknown value to a canonical circuit identifier.
- *
- * Returns `false` for hyphenated route names such as `'coinbase-kyc'`, which
- * are not circuit IDs.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * isCircuitId('coinbase_attestation'); // true
- * isCircuitId('coinbase-kyc');         // false
- * ```
- */
-export declare function isCircuitId(value: unknown): value is CircuitId;
-/**
- * Narrows an unknown value to a circuit identifier that is officially supported
- * today. Planned circuits return `false`.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * isSupportedCircuitId('oidc_domain_attestation'); // true
- * isSupportedCircuitId('mdl_kr_age');              // false — planned
- * ```
- */
-export declare function isSupportedCircuitId(value: unknown): value is CircuitId;
-/**
- * Returns the support status of a circuit.
- *
- * @param circuit - A canonical circuit identifier.
- * @throws Error when the value is not a canonical circuit identifier.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * getCircuitSupportStatus('giwa_attestation'); // 'planned'
- * ```
- */
-export declare function getCircuitSupportStatus(circuit: CircuitId): CircuitSupportStatus;
-/**
- * Whether a circuit's relay request must carry a wallet signature.
- *
- * The SDK checks this to fail fast — "Signer not set" locally beats a 401 from
- * the relay two round trips later, with nothing saying which circuit needed
- * what. The relay declares its OWN copy on purpose and does not import this
- * one: it is a security boundary, and an auth policy that a published package
- * can change is not a policy. A test in the relay asserts the two agree.
- *
- * `satisfies` and not an annotation, so a circuit added above is a compile
- * error here until somebody decides which it is.
- */
-/**
- * Whether a circuit's proof can bind an EIP-712 action, and whether it must.
- *
- * ONE TABLE, because the answer was becoming a chain of `circuit === '...'`
- * tests. It was asked in the deep-link validator and again in
- * `createRelayRequest`, both spelling out one circuit id, and a second
- * action-capable circuit would have made each of them a two-branch chain that
- * ends on whatever the last test happens to be.
- *
- *   'required'  the circuit proves nothing without an action -- the wallet
- *               signs the typed data and there is no other message.
- *   'optional'  the circuit signs the action when one is supplied and
- *               personal_signs its signal hash when one is not. The circuit
- *               itself branches; see giwa-attestation/src/main.nr.
- *   'none'      the circuit has no action inputs. An action sent anyway is a
- *               caller misunderstanding, and is refused rather than dropped:
- *               silently ignoring it would let a dapp believe a proof
- *               authorized something it never mentioned.
- */
-export type CircuitActionBinding = 'none' | 'required' | 'optional';
-export declare const CIRCUIT_ACTION_BINDING: {
-    coinbase_attestation: "none";
-    coinbase_country_attestation: "none";
-    oidc_domain_attestation: "none";
-    giwa_attestation: "optional";
-    dojang_playground: "optional";
-    mdl_kr_ownership: "none";
-    mdl_kr_age: "none";
-    mdl_kr_region: "none";
-};
-/**
- * How this circuit treats an action, or an error naming the id that is not one.
- *
- * No default: a circuit nobody has classified must not inherit 'none', which
- * would silently drop an action a dapp meant to bind.
- */
-export declare function circuitActionBinding(circuit: string): CircuitActionBinding;
-export declare const CIRCUIT_NEEDS_WALLET_SIGNATURE: {
-    coinbase_attestation: true;
-    coinbase_country_attestation: true;
-    oidc_domain_attestation: false;
-    mdl_kr_ownership: false;
-    mdl_kr_age: false;
-    mdl_kr_region: false;
-    giwa_attestation: true;
-    dojang_playground: true;
-};
+export * from '@zkproofport-app/core/circuits';

package/dist/circuits.esm.js

@@ -1,251 +1,2 @@
-/**
- * Canonical ZKProofport circuit identifiers.
- *
- * This module is the single source of truth for circuit IDs. Every other layer
- * — the mobile app, the demo, the relay, server-side provers — reads its list
- * from here instead of keeping a private copy that silently drifts.
- *
- * It has **no imports and no dependencies**, so it can be pulled in on its own:
- *
- * ```typescript
- * import { CIRCUIT_IDS, isCircuitId } from '@zkproofport-app/sdk/circuits';
- * ```
- *
- * The same names are also re-exported from the package root
- * (`@zkproofport-app/sdk`) for callers that already import the SDK.
- *
- * ## Identifiers are canonical and case-sensitive
- *
- * Each ID is the circuit's `name` in its `Nargo.toml`, verbatim. The format is
- * lowercase with underscores. Hyphenated spellings (`coinbase-kyc`,
- * `mdl-kr-age`) are directory or UI route names in other repositories — they
- * are **not** circuit IDs, and passing one produces a nullifier mismatch or a
- * failed on-chain lookup rather than a clear error.
- */
-/**
- * Canonical circuit identifiers, keyed by a stable constant name.
- *
- * Prefer these constants over string literals so a rename is a compile error
- * rather than a runtime surprise.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * import { CIRCUIT_IDS } from '@zkproofport-app/sdk/circuits';
- *
- * const relay = await sdk.createRelayRequest(CIRCUIT_IDS.COINBASE_ATTESTATION, {
- *   scope: 'myapp.com',
- * });
- * ```
- */
-const CIRCUIT_IDS = Object.freeze({
-    /** Coinbase KYC attestation. Officially supported. */
-    COINBASE_ATTESTATION: 'coinbase_attestation',
-    /** Coinbase country attestation (inclusion / exclusion). Officially supported. */
-    COINBASE_COUNTRY_ATTESTATION: 'coinbase_country_attestation',
-    /** OIDC email-domain attestation. Officially supported. */
-    OIDC_DOMAIN_ATTESTATION: 'oidc_domain_attestation',
-    /** GIWA attestation. Planned — not officially supported yet. */
-    GIWA_ATTESTATION: 'giwa_attestation',
-    /** Dojang Playground on GIWA Sepolia. Experimental — testnet only. */
-    DOJANG_PLAYGROUND: 'dojang_playground',
-    /** Korea Mobile ID ownership. Planned — not officially supported yet. */
-    MDL_KR_OWNERSHIP: 'mdl_kr_ownership',
-    /** Korea Mobile ID age threshold. Planned — not officially supported yet. */
-    MDL_KR_AGE: 'mdl_kr_age',
-    /** Korea Mobile ID si/do region. Planned — not officially supported yet. */
-    MDL_KR_REGION: 'mdl_kr_region',
-});
-/**
- * Support status for every circuit.
- *
- * The record is exhaustive over {@link CircuitId}: adding an identifier without
- * giving it a status is a compile error, so this list cannot drift from
- * {@link CIRCUIT_IDS}.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * import { CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS } from '@zkproofport-app/sdk/circuits';
- *
- * CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS.coinbase_attestation; // 'supported'
- * CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS.mdl_kr_age;           // 'planned'
- * ```
- */
-const CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS = Object.freeze({
-    coinbase_attestation: 'supported',
-    coinbase_country_attestation: 'supported',
-    oidc_domain_attestation: 'supported',
-    // Experimental, not planned: the circuit is built, its verifier is
-    // deployed on GIWA Sepolia and the demo requests it. What keeps it out of
-    // 'supported' is that it is testnet-only, so the app offers it behind
-    // Developer Mode and reads its files from main rather than a release tag.
-    giwa_attestation: 'experimental',
-    // Same footing as GIWA: built, verifier deployed on GIWA Sepolia, a real
-    // proof verifies there. Testnet only.
-    dojang_playground: 'experimental',
-    mdl_kr_ownership: 'planned',
-    mdl_kr_age: 'planned',
-    mdl_kr_region: 'planned',
-});
-/**
- * Where each circuit's verification key FILE lives inside the
- * `zkproofport/circuits` repository, relative to its root.
- *
- * Off-chain verification needs the verification key and nothing else — no
- * circuit bytecode, no witness. The key is public by nature: it is what anyone
- * checking a proof must already have, and the Solidity verifiers deployed
- * on-chain embed the same key.
- *
- * NOTE THE TRAILING `/vk` TWICE. In that repository `target/vk` is a DIRECTORY
- * holding `vk`, `vk_hash` and `SHA256SUMS`; the key itself is `target/vk/vk`.
- * These paths were first copied here from the mobile app, which keeps the
- * directory and the filename as two fields and joins them — so taking only the
- * directory produced a URL that answers 404, and the first browser to try
- * off-chain verification said "Could not fetch the verification key (HTTP 404)".
- *
- * Exhaustive over {@link CircuitId} on purpose. A new circuit whose key path is
- * not listed here fails to compile rather than failing at verification time,
- * where the only symptom would be a proof that cannot be checked.
- */
-const CIRCUIT_VK_PATHS = Object.freeze({
-    coinbase_attestation: 'coinbase-attestation/target/vk/vk',
-    coinbase_country_attestation: 'coinbase-country-attestation/target/vk/vk',
-    oidc_domain_attestation: 'oidc-domain-attestation/target/vk/vk',
-    giwa_attestation: 'giwa-attestation/target/vk/vk',
-    dojang_playground: 'dojang-playground/target/vk/vk',
-    mdl_kr_ownership: 'mdl/kr-ownership/target/vk/vk',
-    mdl_kr_age: 'mdl/kr-age/target/vk/vk',
-    mdl_kr_region: 'mdl/kr-region/target/vk/vk',
-});
-/**
- * Every canonical circuit identifier, in declaration order.
- *
- * Includes circuits that are still `planned`. Use {@link SUPPORTED_CIRCUIT_IDS}
- * when you only want the ones that are officially supported today.
- */
-const ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS = Object.freeze(Object.values(CIRCUIT_IDS));
-/**
- * Circuits that are officially supported today: the two Coinbase circuits and
- * OIDC domain attestation.
- *
- * Derived from {@link CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS}, so it cannot fall out of sync.
- */
-const SUPPORTED_CIRCUIT_IDS = Object.freeze(ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.filter((id) => CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[id] === 'supported'));
-/**
- * Circuits whose identifiers are reserved but which are not officially
- * supported yet: GIWA attestation and the three Korea Mobile ID circuits.
- *
- * Derived from {@link CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS}, so it cannot fall out of sync.
- */
-/**
- * Circuits you can prove today, on a testnet, with everything subject to change.
- *
- * `giwa_attestation` is in this state. Calling it `planned` would be wrong —
- * the circuit compiles, the verifier is deployed and a proof verifies against
- * it — and calling it `supported` would be worse, because the only deployment
- * is a testnet (GIWA Sepolia). Neither existing word was true, so the honest
- * move was a third word rather than picking the closer lie.
- */
-const EXPERIMENTAL_CIRCUIT_IDS = Object.freeze(ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.filter(id => CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[id] === 'experimental'));
-const PLANNED_CIRCUIT_IDS = Object.freeze(ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.filter((id) => CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[id] === 'planned'));
-/**
- * Narrows an unknown value to a canonical circuit identifier.
- *
- * Returns `false` for hyphenated route names such as `'coinbase-kyc'`, which
- * are not circuit IDs.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * isCircuitId('coinbase_attestation'); // true
- * isCircuitId('coinbase-kyc');         // false
- * ```
- */
-function isCircuitId(value) {
-    return typeof value === 'string' && ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.includes(value);
-}
-/**
- * Narrows an unknown value to a circuit identifier that is officially supported
- * today. Planned circuits return `false`.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * isSupportedCircuitId('oidc_domain_attestation'); // true
- * isSupportedCircuitId('mdl_kr_age');              // false — planned
- * ```
- */
-function isSupportedCircuitId(value) {
-    return isCircuitId(value) && CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[value] === 'supported';
-}
-/**
- * Returns the support status of a circuit.
- *
- * @param circuit - A canonical circuit identifier.
- * @throws Error when the value is not a canonical circuit identifier.
- *
- * @example
- * ```typescript
- * getCircuitSupportStatus('giwa_attestation'); // 'planned'
- * ```
- */
-function getCircuitSupportStatus(circuit) {
-    if (!isCircuitId(circuit)) {
-        throw new Error(`Unknown circuit '${String(circuit)}'. Expected one of: ${ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.join(', ')}`);
-    }
-    return CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[circuit];
-}
-const CIRCUIT_ACTION_BINDING = {
-    coinbase_attestation: 'none',
-    coinbase_country_attestation: 'none',
-    // The signature lives inside the identity token; no wallet, no action.
-    oidc_domain_attestation: 'none',
-    // Branches in-circuit: with an action the wallet signs the typed data,
-    // without one it personal_signs the request's signal hash.
-    giwa_attestation: 'optional',
-    // Same branch as GIWA; see dojang-playground/src/main.nr.
-    dojang_playground: 'optional',
-    mdl_kr_ownership: 'none',
-    mdl_kr_age: 'none',
-    mdl_kr_region: 'none',
-};
-/*
- * The union is declared above rather than derived from the table's values.
- *
- * Deriving it narrowed the type to whatever the table happens to hold today --
- * 'none' | 'optional' -- and TypeScript then called every `=== 'required'`
- * check impossible. The publish typecheck caught it; `rollup` and `vitest` did
- * not. 'required' is a state a circuit can legitimately be in (an EIP-712 path
- * and nothing else), so the union says so and the table is checked against it.
- */
-/**
- * How this circuit treats an action, or an error naming the id that is not one.
- *
- * No default: a circuit nobody has classified must not inherit 'none', which
- * would silently drop an action a dapp meant to bind.
- */
-function circuitActionBinding(circuit) {
-    const binding = CIRCUIT_ACTION_BINDING[circuit];
-    if (!binding) {
-        throw new Error(`Unknown circuit '${circuit}'. Expected: ${ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.join(', ')}`);
-    }
-    return binding;
-}
-const CIRCUIT_NEEDS_WALLET_SIGNATURE = {
-    coinbase_attestation: true,
-    coinbase_country_attestation: true,
-    // The signature is inside the OIDC identity token, checked by the prover.
-    oidc_domain_attestation: false,
-    // Web2 (OmniOne CX) flows with no wallet binding at all.
-    mdl_kr_ownership: false,
-    mdl_kr_age: false,
-    mdl_kr_region: false,
-    // A GIWA-attested wallet signing an EIP-712 action (or its signal hash).
-    // This read `false` while the circuit had always verified a wallet signature
-    // -- it sat under the Web2 comment above and was never revisited. A request
-    // for it would have reached the relay with no signer.
-    giwa_attestation: true,
-    // The wallet signs the request, and the same key must have signed its
-    // Playground faucet transaction.
-    dojang_playground: true,
-};
-
-export { ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS, CIRCUIT_ACTION_BINDING, CIRCUIT_IDS, CIRCUIT_NEEDS_WALLET_SIGNATURE, CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS, CIRCUIT_VK_PATHS, EXPERIMENTAL_CIRCUIT_IDS, PLANNED_CIRCUIT_IDS, SUPPORTED_CIRCUIT_IDS, circuitActionBinding, getCircuitSupportStatus, isCircuitId, isSupportedCircuitId };
+export * from '@zkproofport-app/core/circuits';
 //# sourceMappingURL=circuits.esm.js.map

package/dist/circuits.esm.js.map

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"circuits.esm.js","sources":["../src/circuits.ts"],"sourcesContent":["/**\n * Canonical ZKProofport circuit identifiers.\n *\n * This module is the single source of truth for circuit IDs. Every other layer\n * — the mobile app, the demo, the relay, server-side provers — reads its list\n * from here instead of keeping a private copy that silently drifts.\n *\n * It has **no imports and no dependencies**, so it can be pulled in on its own:\n *\n * ```typescript\n * import { CIRCUIT_IDS, isCircuitId } from '@zkproofport-app/sdk/circuits';\n * ```\n *\n * The same names are also re-exported from the package root\n * (`@zkproofport-app/sdk`) for callers that already import the SDK.\n *\n * ## Identifiers are canonical and case-sensitive\n *\n * Each ID is the circuit's `name` in its `Nargo.toml`, verbatim. The format is\n * lowercase with underscores. Hyphenated spellings (`coinbase-kyc`,\n * `mdl-kr-age`) are directory or UI route names in other repositories — they\n * are **not** circuit IDs, and passing one produces a nullifier mismatch or a\n * failed on-chain lookup rather than a clear error.\n */\n\n/**\n * Whether a circuit is officially supported today or still on the roadmap.\n *\n * - `supported` — generally available. Safe to build a product on.\n * - `planned` — the identifier is reserved and the circuit exists, but it is\n *   not officially supported yet. Availability, inputs and public-input layout\n *   may change without a major version bump.\n */\nexport type CircuitSupportStatus = 'supported' | 'experimental' | 'planned';\n\n/**\n * Canonical circuit identifiers, keyed by a stable constant name.\n *\n * Prefer these constants over string literals so a rename is a compile error\n * rather than a runtime surprise.\n *\n * @example\n * ```typescript\n * import { CIRCUIT_IDS } from '@zkproofport-app/sdk/circuits';\n *\n * const relay = await sdk.createRelayRequest(CIRCUIT_IDS.COINBASE_ATTESTATION, {\n *   scope: 'myapp.com',\n * });\n * ```\n */\nexport const CIRCUIT_IDS = Object.freeze({\n  /** Coinbase KYC attestation. Officially supported. */\n  COINBASE_ATTESTATION: 'coinbase_attestation',\n  /** Coinbase country attestation (inclusion / exclusion). Officially supported. */\n  COINBASE_COUNTRY_ATTESTATION: 'coinbase_country_attestation',\n  /** OIDC email-domain attestation. Officially supported. */\n  OIDC_DOMAIN_ATTESTATION: 'oidc_domain_attestation',\n  /** GIWA attestation. Planned — not officially supported yet. */\n  GIWA_ATTESTATION: 'giwa_attestation',\n  /** Dojang Playground on GIWA Sepolia. Experimental — testnet only. */\n  DOJANG_PLAYGROUND: 'dojang_playground',\n  /** Korea Mobile ID ownership. Planned — not officially supported yet. */\n  MDL_KR_OWNERSHIP: 'mdl_kr_ownership',\n  /** Korea Mobile ID age threshold. Planned — not officially supported yet. */\n  MDL_KR_AGE: 'mdl_kr_age',\n  /** Korea Mobile ID si/do region. Planned — not officially supported yet. */\n  MDL_KR_REGION: 'mdl_kr_region',\n} as const);\n\n/**\n * Union of every canonical circuit identifier.\n *\n * `CircuitType` (exported from the package root) is an alias of this type — the\n * two names refer to the same union, and this module is where it is defined.\n */\nexport type CircuitId = (typeof CIRCUIT_IDS)[keyof typeof CIRCUIT_IDS];\n\n/**\n * Support status for every circuit.\n *\n * The record is exhaustive over {@link CircuitId}: adding an identifier without\n * giving it a status is a compile error, so this list cannot drift from\n * {@link CIRCUIT_IDS}.\n *\n * @example\n * ```typescript\n * import { CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS } from '@zkproofport-app/sdk/circuits';\n *\n * CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS.coinbase_attestation; // 'supported'\n * CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS.mdl_kr_age;           // 'planned'\n * ```\n */\nexport const CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS: Readonly<Record<CircuitId, CircuitSupportStatus>> =\n  Object.freeze({\n    coinbase_attestation: 'supported',\n    coinbase_country_attestation: 'supported',\n    oidc_domain_attestation: 'supported',\n    // Experimental, not planned: the circuit is built, its verifier is\n    // deployed on GIWA Sepolia and the demo requests it. What keeps it out of\n    // 'supported' is that it is testnet-only, so the app offers it behind\n    // Developer Mode and reads its files from main rather than a release tag.\n    giwa_attestation: 'experimental',\n    // Same footing as GIWA: built, verifier deployed on GIWA Sepolia, a real\n    // proof verifies there. Testnet only.\n    dojang_playground: 'experimental',\n    mdl_kr_ownership: 'planned',\n    mdl_kr_age: 'planned',\n    mdl_kr_region: 'planned',\n  } as const);\n\n/**\n * Where each circuit's verification key FILE lives inside the\n * `zkproofport/circuits` repository, relative to its root.\n *\n * Off-chain verification needs the verification key and nothing else — no\n * circuit bytecode, no witness. The key is public by nature: it is what anyone\n * checking a proof must already have, and the Solidity verifiers deployed\n * on-chain embed the same key.\n *\n * NOTE THE TRAILING `/vk` TWICE. In that repository `target/vk` is a DIRECTORY\n * holding `vk`, `vk_hash` and `SHA256SUMS`; the key itself is `target/vk/vk`.\n * These paths were first copied here from the mobile app, which keeps the\n * directory and the filename as two fields and joins them — so taking only the\n * directory produced a URL that answers 404, and the first browser to try\n * off-chain verification said \"Could not fetch the verification key (HTTP 404)\".\n *\n * Exhaustive over {@link CircuitId} on purpose. A new circuit whose key path is\n * not listed here fails to compile rather than failing at verification time,\n * where the only symptom would be a proof that cannot be checked.\n */\nexport const CIRCUIT_VK_PATHS: Readonly<Record<CircuitId, string>> = Object.freeze({\n  coinbase_attestation: 'coinbase-attestation/target/vk/vk',\n  coinbase_country_attestation: 'coinbase-country-attestation/target/vk/vk',\n  oidc_domain_attestation: 'oidc-domain-attestation/target/vk/vk',\n  giwa_attestation: 'giwa-attestation/target/vk/vk',\n  dojang_playground: 'dojang-playground/target/vk/vk',\n  mdl_kr_ownership: 'mdl/kr-ownership/target/vk/vk',\n  mdl_kr_age: 'mdl/kr-age/target/vk/vk',\n  mdl_kr_region: 'mdl/kr-region/target/vk/vk',\n} as const);\n\n/**\n * Every canonical circuit identifier, in declaration order.\n *\n * Includes circuits that are still `planned`. Use {@link SUPPORTED_CIRCUIT_IDS}\n * when you only want the ones that are officially supported today.\n */\nexport const ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS: readonly CircuitId[] = Object.freeze(\n  Object.values(CIRCUIT_IDS) as CircuitId[]\n);\n\n/**\n * Circuits that are officially supported today: the two Coinbase circuits and\n * OIDC domain attestation.\n *\n * Derived from {@link CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS}, so it cannot fall out of sync.\n */\nexport const SUPPORTED_CIRCUIT_IDS: readonly CircuitId[] = Object.freeze(\n  ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.filter((id) => CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[id] === 'supported')\n);\n\n/**\n * Circuits whose identifiers are reserved but which are not officially\n * supported yet: GIWA attestation and the three Korea Mobile ID circuits.\n *\n * Derived from {@link CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS}, so it cannot fall out of sync.\n */\n/**\n * Circuits you can prove today, on a testnet, with everything subject to change.\n *\n * `giwa_attestation` is in this state. Calling it `planned` would be wrong —\n * the circuit compiles, the verifier is deployed and a proof verifies against\n * it — and calling it `supported` would be worse, because the only deployment\n * is a testnet (GIWA Sepolia). Neither existing word was true, so the honest\n * move was a third word rather than picking the closer lie.\n */\nexport const EXPERIMENTAL_CIRCUIT_IDS: readonly CircuitId[] = Object.freeze(\n  ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.filter(id => CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[id] === 'experimental'),\n);\n\nexport const PLANNED_CIRCUIT_IDS: readonly CircuitId[] = Object.freeze(\n  ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.filter((id) => CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[id] === 'planned')\n);\n\n/**\n * Narrows an unknown value to a canonical circuit identifier.\n *\n * Returns `false` for hyphenated route names such as `'coinbase-kyc'`, which\n * are not circuit IDs.\n *\n * @example\n * ```typescript\n * isCircuitId('coinbase_attestation'); // true\n * isCircuitId('coinbase-kyc');         // false\n * ```\n */\nexport function isCircuitId(value: unknown): value is CircuitId {\n  return typeof value === 'string' && (ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS as readonly string[]).includes(value);\n}\n\n/**\n * Narrows an unknown value to a circuit identifier that is officially supported\n * today. Planned circuits return `false`.\n *\n * @example\n * ```typescript\n * isSupportedCircuitId('oidc_domain_attestation'); // true\n * isSupportedCircuitId('mdl_kr_age');              // false — planned\n * ```\n */\nexport function isSupportedCircuitId(value: unknown): value is CircuitId {\n  return isCircuitId(value) && CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[value] === 'supported';\n}\n\n/**\n * Returns the support status of a circuit.\n *\n * @param circuit - A canonical circuit identifier.\n * @throws Error when the value is not a canonical circuit identifier.\n *\n * @example\n * ```typescript\n * getCircuitSupportStatus('giwa_attestation'); // 'planned'\n * ```\n */\nexport function getCircuitSupportStatus(circuit: CircuitId): CircuitSupportStatus {\n  if (!isCircuitId(circuit)) {\n    throw new Error(\n      `Unknown circuit '${String(circuit)}'. Expected one of: ${ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.join(', ')}`\n    );\n  }\n  return CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_STATUS[circuit];\n}\n\n/**\n * Whether a circuit's relay request must carry a wallet signature.\n *\n * The SDK checks this to fail fast — \"Signer not set\" locally beats a 401 from\n * the relay two round trips later, with nothing saying which circuit needed\n * what. The relay declares its OWN copy on purpose and does not import this\n * one: it is a security boundary, and an auth policy that a published package\n * can change is not a policy. A test in the relay asserts the two agree.\n *\n * `satisfies` and not an annotation, so a circuit added above is a compile\n * error here until somebody decides which it is.\n */\n/**\n * Whether a circuit's proof can bind an EIP-712 action, and whether it must.\n *\n * ONE TABLE, because the answer was becoming a chain of `circuit === '...'`\n * tests. It was asked in the deep-link validator and again in\n * `createRelayRequest`, both spelling out one circuit id, and a second\n * action-capable circuit would have made each of them a two-branch chain that\n * ends on whatever the last test happens to be.\n *\n *   'required'  the circuit proves nothing without an action -- the wallet\n *               signs the typed data and there is no other message.\n *   'optional'  the circuit signs the action when one is supplied and\n *               personal_signs its signal hash when one is not. The circuit\n *               itself branches; see giwa-attestation/src/main.nr.\n *   'none'      the circuit has no action inputs. An action sent anyway is a\n *               caller misunderstanding, and is refused rather than dropped:\n *               silently ignoring it would let a dapp believe a proof\n *               authorized something it never mentioned.\n */\nexport type CircuitActionBinding = 'none' | 'required' | 'optional';\n\nexport const CIRCUIT_ACTION_BINDING = {\n  coinbase_attestation: 'none',\n  coinbase_country_attestation: 'none',\n  // The signature lives inside the identity token; no wallet, no action.\n  oidc_domain_attestation: 'none',\n  // Branches in-circuit: with an action the wallet signs the typed data,\n  // without one it personal_signs the request's signal hash.\n  giwa_attestation: 'optional',\n  // Same branch as GIWA; see dojang-playground/src/main.nr.\n  dojang_playground: 'optional',\n  mdl_kr_ownership: 'none',\n  mdl_kr_age: 'none',\n  mdl_kr_region: 'none',\n} satisfies Record<CircuitId, CircuitActionBinding>;\n\n/*\n * The union is declared above rather than derived from the table's values.\n *\n * Deriving it narrowed the type to whatever the table happens to hold today --\n * 'none' | 'optional' -- and TypeScript then called every `=== 'required'`\n * check impossible. The publish typecheck caught it; `rollup` and `vitest` did\n * not. 'required' is a state a circuit can legitimately be in (an EIP-712 path\n * and nothing else), so the union says so and the table is checked against it.\n */\n\n/**\n * How this circuit treats an action, or an error naming the id that is not one.\n *\n * No default: a circuit nobody has classified must not inherit 'none', which\n * would silently drop an action a dapp meant to bind.\n */\nexport function circuitActionBinding(circuit: string): CircuitActionBinding {\n  const binding = (CIRCUIT_ACTION_BINDING as Record<string, CircuitActionBinding | undefined>)[circuit];\n  if (!binding) {\n    throw new Error(\n      `Unknown circuit '${circuit}'. Expected: ${ALL_CIRCUIT_IDS.join(', ')}`,\n    );\n  }\n  return binding;\n}\n\nexport const CIRCUIT_NEEDS_WALLET_SIGNATURE = {\n  coinbase_attestation: true,\n  coinbase_country_attestation: true,\n  // The signature is inside the OIDC identity token, checked by the prover.\n  oidc_domain_attestation: false,\n  // Web2 (OmniOne CX) flows with no wallet binding at all.\n  mdl_kr_ownership: false,\n  mdl_kr_age: false,\n  mdl_kr_region: false,\n  // A GIWA-attested wallet signing an EIP-712 action (or its signal hash).\n  // This read `false` while the circuit had always verified a wallet signature\n  // -- it sat under the Web2 comment above and was never revisited. A request\n  // for it would have reached the relay with no signer.\n  giwa_attestation: true,\n  // The wallet signs the request, and the same key must have signed its\n  // Playground faucet transaction.\n  dojang_playground: true,\n} satisfies Record<CircuitId, boolean>;\n"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;AAuBG;AAYH;;;;;;;;;;;;;;AAcG;AACI,MAAM,WAAW,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;;AAEvC,IAAA,oBAAoB,EAAE,sBAAsB;;AAE5C,IAAA,4BAA4B,EAAE,8BAA8B;;AAE5D,IAAA,uBAAuB,EAAE,yBAAyB;;AAElD,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,kBAAkB;;AAEpC,IAAA,iBAAiB,EAAE,mBAAmB;;AAEtC,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,kBAAkB;;AAEpC,IAAA,UAAU,EAAE,YAAY;;AAExB,IAAA,aAAa,EAAE,eAAe;AACtB,CAAA;AAUV;;;;;;;;;;;;;;AAcG;AACI,MAAM,sBAAsB,GACjC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;AACZ,IAAA,oBAAoB,EAAE,WAAW;AACjC,IAAA,4BAA4B,EAAE,WAAW;AACzC,IAAA,uBAAuB,EAAE,WAAW;;;;;AAKpC,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,cAAc;;;AAGhC,IAAA,iBAAiB,EAAE,cAAc;AACjC,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,SAAS;AAC3B,IAAA,UAAU,EAAE,SAAS;AACrB,IAAA,aAAa,EAAE,SAAS;AAChB,CAAA;AAEZ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;AAmBG;AACI,MAAM,gBAAgB,GAAwC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;AACjF,IAAA,oBAAoB,EAAE,mCAAmC;AACzD,IAAA,4BAA4B,EAAE,2CAA2C;AACzE,IAAA,uBAAuB,EAAE,sCAAsC;AAC/D,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,+BAA+B;AACjD,IAAA,iBAAiB,EAAE,gCAAgC;AACnD,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,+BAA+B;AACjD,IAAA,UAAU,EAAE,yBAAyB;AACrC,IAAA,aAAa,EAAE,4BAA4B;AACnC,CAAA;AAEV;;;;;AAKG;AACI,MAAM,eAAe,GAAyB,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAChE,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,WAAW,CAAgB;AAG3C;;;;;AAKG;AACI,MAAM,qBAAqB,GAAyB,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CACtE,eAAe,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,KAAK,sBAAsB,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,KAAK,WAAW,CAAC;AAG5E;;;;;AAKG;AACH;;;;;;;;AAQG;AACI,MAAM,wBAAwB,GAAyB,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CACzE,eAAe,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,sBAAsB,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,KAAK,cAAc,CAAC;AAGtE,MAAM,mBAAmB,GAAyB,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CACpE,eAAe,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,KAAK,sBAAsB,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC;AAG1E;;;;;;;;;;;AAWG;AACG,SAAU,WAAW,CAAC,KAAc,EAAA;IACxC,OAAO,OAAO,KAAK,KAAK,QAAQ,IAAK,eAAqC,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC;AAC5F;AAEA;;;;;;;;;AASG;AACG,SAAU,oBAAoB,CAAC,KAAc,EAAA;IACjD,OAAO,WAAW,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,sBAAsB,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,KAAK,WAAW;AAC5E;AAEA;;;;;;;;;;AAUG;AACG,SAAU,uBAAuB,CAAC,OAAkB,EAAA;AACxD,IAAA,IAAI,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,EAAE;AACzB,QAAA,MAAM,IAAI,KAAK,CACb,CAAA,iBAAA,EAAoB,MAAM,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAA,oBAAA,EAAuB,eAAe,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAA,CAAE,CACvF;IACH;AACA,IAAA,OAAO,sBAAsB,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC;AACxC;AAmCO,MAAM,sBAAsB,GAAG;AACpC,IAAA,oBAAoB,EAAE,MAAM;AAC5B,IAAA,4BAA4B,EAAE,MAAM;;AAEpC,IAAA,uBAAuB,EAAE,MAAM;;;AAG/B,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,UAAU;;AAE5B,IAAA,iBAAiB,EAAE,UAAU;AAC7B,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,MAAM;AACxB,IAAA,UAAU,EAAE,MAAM;AAClB,IAAA,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM;;AAGvB;;;;;;;;AAQG;AAEH;;;;;AAKG;AACG,SAAU,oBAAoB,CAAC,OAAe,EAAA;AAClD,IAAA,MAAM,OAAO,GAAI,sBAA2E,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC;IACrG,IAAI,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE;AACZ,QAAA,MAAM,IAAI,KAAK,CACb,CAAA,iBAAA,EAAoB,OAAO,CAAA,aAAA,EAAgB,eAAe,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAA,CAAE,CACxE;IACH;AACA,IAAA,OAAO,OAAO;AAChB;AAEO,MAAM,8BAA8B,GAAG;AAC5C,IAAA,oBAAoB,EAAE,IAAI;AAC1B,IAAA,4BAA4B,EAAE,IAAI;;AAElC,IAAA,uBAAuB,EAAE,KAAK;;AAE9B,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,KAAK;AACvB,IAAA,UAAU,EAAE,KAAK;AACjB,IAAA,aAAa,EAAE,KAAK;;;;;AAKpB,IAAA,gBAAgB,EAAE,IAAI;;;AAGtB,IAAA,iBAAiB,EAAE,IAAI;;;;;"}
+{"version":3,"file":"circuits.esm.js","sources":[],"sourcesContent":[],"names":[],"mappings":""}