@zipify/wysiwyg 1.2.1-0 → 1.2.1

package/node_modules_lambda/safer-buffer/Porting-Buffer.md

@@ -1,268 +0,0 @@
-# Porting to the Buffer.from/Buffer.alloc API
-
-<a id="overview"></a>
-## Overview
-
-- [Variant 1: Drop support for Node.js ≤ 4.4.x and 5.0.0 — 5.9.x.](#variant-1) (*recommended*)
-- [Variant 2: Use a polyfill](#variant-2)
-- [Variant 3: manual detection, with safeguards](#variant-3)
-
-### Finding problematic bits of code using grep
-
-Just run `grep -nrE '[^a-zA-Z](Slow)?Buffer\s*\(' --exclude-dir node_modules`.
-
-It will find all the potentially unsafe places in your own code (with some considerably unlikely
-exceptions).
-
-### Finding problematic bits of code using Node.js 8
-
-If you’re using Node.js ≥ 8.0.0 (which is recommended), Node.js exposes multiple options that help with finding the relevant pieces of code:
-
-- `--trace-warnings` will make Node.js show a stack trace for this warning and other warnings that are printed by Node.js.
-- `--trace-deprecation` does the same thing, but only for deprecation warnings.
-- `--pending-deprecation` will show more types of deprecation warnings. In particular, it will show the `Buffer()` deprecation warning, even on Node.js 8.
-
-You can set these flags using an environment variable:
-
-```console
-$ export NODE_OPTIONS='--trace-warnings --pending-deprecation'
-$ cat example.js
-'use strict';
-const foo = new Buffer('foo');
-$ node example.js
-(node:7147) [DEP0005] DeprecationWarning: The Buffer() and new Buffer() constructors are not recommended for use due to security and usability concerns. Please use the new Buffer.alloc(), Buffer.allocUnsafe(), or Buffer.from() construction methods instead.
-    at showFlaggedDeprecation (buffer.js:127:13)
-    at new Buffer (buffer.js:148:3)
-    at Object.<anonymous> (/path/to/example.js:2:13)
-    [... more stack trace lines ...]
-```
-
-### Finding problematic bits of code using linters
-
-Eslint rules [no-buffer-constructor](https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-buffer-constructor)
-or
-[node/no-deprecated-api](https://github.com/mysticatea/eslint-plugin-node/blob/master/docs/rules/no-deprecated-api.md)
-also find calls to deprecated `Buffer()` API. Those rules are included in some pre-sets.
-
-There is a drawback, though, that it doesn't always
-[work correctly](https://github.com/chalker/safer-buffer#why-not-safe-buffer) when `Buffer` is
-overriden e.g. with a polyfill, so recommended is a combination of this and some other method
-described above.
-
-<a id="variant-1"></a>
-## Variant 1: Drop support for Node.js ≤ 4.4.x and 5.0.0 — 5.9.x.
-
-This is the recommended solution nowadays that would imply only minimal overhead.
-
-The Node.js 5.x release line has been unsupported since July 2016, and the Node.js 4.x release line reaches its End of Life in April 2018 (→ [Schedule](https://github.com/nodejs/Release#release-schedule)). This means that these versions of Node.js will *not* receive any updates, even in case of security issues, so using these release lines should be avoided, if at all possible.
-
-What you would do in this case is to convert all `new Buffer()` or `Buffer()` calls to use `Buffer.alloc()` or `Buffer.from()`, in the following way:
-
-- For `new Buffer(number)`, replace it with `Buffer.alloc(number)`.
-- For `new Buffer(string)` (or `new Buffer(string, encoding)`), replace it with `Buffer.from(string)` (or `Buffer.from(string, encoding)`).
-- For all other combinations of arguments (these are much rarer), also replace `new Buffer(...arguments)` with `Buffer.from(...arguments)`.
-
-Note that `Buffer.alloc()` is also _faster_ on the current Node.js versions than
-`new Buffer(size).fill(0)`, which is what you would otherwise need to ensure zero-filling.
-
-Enabling eslint rule [no-buffer-constructor](https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-buffer-constructor)
-or
-[node/no-deprecated-api](https://github.com/mysticatea/eslint-plugin-node/blob/master/docs/rules/no-deprecated-api.md)
-is recommended to avoid accidential unsafe Buffer API usage.
-
-There is also a [JSCodeshift codemod](https://github.com/joyeecheung/node-dep-codemod#dep005)
-for automatically migrating Buffer constructors to `Buffer.alloc()` or `Buffer.from()`.
-Note that it currently only works with cases where the arguments are literals or where the
-constructor is invoked with two arguments.
-
-_If you currently support those older Node.js versions and dropping them would be a semver-major change
-for you, or if you support older branches of your packages, consider using [Variant 2](#variant-2)
-or [Variant 3](#variant-3) on older branches, so people using those older branches will also receive
-the fix. That way, you will eradicate potential issues caused by unguarded Buffer API usage and
-your users will not observe a runtime deprecation warning when running your code on Node.js 10._
-
-<a id="variant-2"></a>
-## Variant 2: Use a polyfill
-
-Utilize [safer-buffer](https://www.npmjs.com/package/safer-buffer) as a polyfill to support older
-Node.js versions.
-
-You would take exacly the same steps as in [Variant 1](#variant-1), but with a polyfill
-`const Buffer = require('safer-buffer').Buffer` in all files where you use the new `Buffer` api.
-
-Make sure that you do not use old `new Buffer` API — in any files where the line above is added,
-using old `new Buffer()` API will _throw_. It will be easy to notice that in CI, though.
-
-Alternatively, you could use [buffer-from](https://www.npmjs.com/package/buffer-from) and/or
-[buffer-alloc](https://www.npmjs.com/package/buffer-alloc) [ponyfills](https://ponyfill.com/) —
-those are great, the only downsides being 4 deps in the tree and slightly more code changes to
-migrate off them (as you would be using e.g. `Buffer.from` under a different name). If you need only
-`Buffer.from` polyfilled — `buffer-from` alone which comes with no extra dependencies.
-
-_Alternatively, you could use [safe-buffer](https://www.npmjs.com/package/safe-buffer) — it also
-provides a polyfill, but takes a different approach which has
-[it's drawbacks](https://github.com/chalker/safer-buffer#why-not-safe-buffer). It will allow you
-to also use the older `new Buffer()` API in your code, though — but that's arguably a benefit, as
-it is problematic, can cause issues in your code, and will start emitting runtime deprecation
-warnings starting with Node.js 10._
-
-Note that in either case, it is important that you also remove all calls to the old Buffer
-API manually — just throwing in `safe-buffer` doesn't fix the problem by itself, it just provides
-a polyfill for the new API. I have seen people doing that mistake.
-
-Enabling eslint rule [no-buffer-constructor](https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-buffer-constructor)
-or
-[node/no-deprecated-api](https://github.com/mysticatea/eslint-plugin-node/blob/master/docs/rules/no-deprecated-api.md)
-is recommended.
-
-_Don't forget to drop the polyfill usage once you drop support for Node.js < 4.5.0._
-
-<a id="variant-3"></a>
-## Variant 3 — manual detection, with safeguards
-
-This is useful if you create Buffer instances in only a few places (e.g. one), or you have your own
-wrapper around them.
-
-### Buffer(0)
-
-This special case for creating empty buffers can be safely replaced with `Buffer.concat([])`, which
-returns the same result all the way down to Node.js 0.8.x.
-
-### Buffer(notNumber)
-
-Before:
-
-```js
-var buf = new Buffer(notNumber, encoding);
-```
-
-After:
-
-```js
-var buf;
-if (Buffer.from && Buffer.from !== Uint8Array.from) {
-  buf = Buffer.from(notNumber, encoding);
-} else {
-  if (typeof notNumber === 'number')
-    throw new Error('The "size" argument must be of type number.');
-  buf = new Buffer(notNumber, encoding);
-}
-```
-
-`encoding` is optional.
-
-Note that the `typeof notNumber` before `new Buffer` is required (for cases when `notNumber` argument is not
-hard-coded) and _is not caused by the deprecation of Buffer constructor_ — it's exactly _why_ the
-Buffer constructor is deprecated. Ecosystem packages lacking this type-check caused numereous
-security issues — situations when unsanitized user input could end up in the `Buffer(arg)` create
-problems ranging from DoS to leaking sensitive information to the attacker from the process memory.
-
-When `notNumber` argument is hardcoded (e.g. literal `"abc"` or `[0,1,2]`), the `typeof` check can
-be omitted.
-
-Also note that using TypeScript does not fix this problem for you — when libs written in
-`TypeScript` are used from JS, or when user input ends up there — it behaves exactly as pure JS, as
-all type checks are translation-time only and are not present in the actual JS code which TS
-compiles to.
-
-### Buffer(number)
-
-For Node.js 0.10.x (and below) support:
-
-```js
-var buf;
-if (Buffer.alloc) {
-  buf = Buffer.alloc(number);
-} else {
-  buf = new Buffer(number);
-  buf.fill(0);
-}
-```
-
-Otherwise (Node.js ≥ 0.12.x):
-
-```js
-const buf = Buffer.alloc ? Buffer.alloc(number) : new Buffer(number).fill(0);
-```
-
-## Regarding Buffer.allocUnsafe
-
-Be extra cautious when using `Buffer.allocUnsafe`:
- * Don't use it if you don't have a good reason to
-   * e.g. you probably won't ever see a performance difference for small buffers, in fact, those
-     might be even faster with `Buffer.alloc()`,
-   * if your code is not in the hot code path — you also probably won't notice a difference,
-   * keep in mind that zero-filling minimizes the potential risks.
- * If you use it, make sure that you never return the buffer in a partially-filled state,
-   * if you are writing to it sequentially — always truncate it to the actuall written length
-
-Errors in handling buffers allocated with `Buffer.allocUnsafe` could result in various issues,
-ranged from undefined behaviour of your code to sensitive data (user input, passwords, certs)
-leaking to the remote attacker.
-
-_Note that the same applies to `new Buffer` usage without zero-filling, depending on the Node.js
-version (and lacking type checks also adds DoS to the list of potential problems)._
-
-<a id="faq"></a>
-## FAQ
-
-<a id="design-flaws"></a>
-### What is wrong with the `Buffer` constructor?
-
-The `Buffer` constructor could be used to create a buffer in many different ways:
-
-- `new Buffer(42)` creates a `Buffer` of 42 bytes. Before Node.js 8, this buffer contained
-  *arbitrary memory* for performance reasons, which could include anything ranging from
-  program source code to passwords and encryption keys.
-- `new Buffer('abc')` creates a `Buffer` that contains the UTF-8-encoded version of
-  the string `'abc'`. A second argument could specify another encoding: For example,
-  `new Buffer(string, 'base64')` could be used to convert a Base64 string into the original
-  sequence of bytes that it represents.
-- There are several other combinations of arguments.
-
-This meant that, in code like `var buffer = new Buffer(foo);`, *it is not possible to tell
-what exactly the contents of the generated buffer are* without knowing the type of `foo`.
-
-Sometimes, the value of `foo` comes from an external source. For example, this function
-could be exposed as a service on a web server, converting a UTF-8 string into its Base64 form:
-
-```
-function stringToBase64(req, res) {
-  // The request body should have the format of `{ string: 'foobar' }`
-  const rawBytes = new Buffer(req.body.string)
-  const encoded = rawBytes.toString('base64')
-  res.end({ encoded: encoded })
-}
-```
-
-Note that this code does *not* validate the type of `req.body.string`:
-
-- `req.body.string` is expected to be a string. If this is the case, all goes well.
-- `req.body.string` is controlled by the client that sends the request.
-- If `req.body.string` is the *number* `50`, the `rawBytes` would be 50 bytes:
-  - Before Node.js 8, the content would be uninitialized
-  - After Node.js 8, the content would be `50` bytes with the value `0`
-
-Because of the missing type check, an attacker could intentionally send a number
-as part of the request. Using this, they can either:
-
-- Read uninitialized memory. This **will** leak passwords, encryption keys and other
-  kinds of sensitive information. (Information leak)
-- Force the program to allocate a large amount of memory. For example, when specifying
-  `500000000` as the input value, each request will allocate 500MB of memory.
-  This can be used to either exhaust the memory available of a program completely
-  and make it crash, or slow it down significantly. (Denial of Service)
-
-Both of these scenarios are considered serious security issues in a real-world
-web server context.
-
-when using `Buffer.from(req.body.string)` instead, passing a number will always
-throw an exception instead, giving a controlled behaviour that can always be
-handled by the program.
-
-<a id="ecosystem-usage"></a>
-### The `Buffer()` constructor has been deprecated for a while. Is this really an issue?
-
-Surveys of code in the `npm` ecosystem have shown that the `Buffer()` constructor is still
-widely used. This includes new code, and overall usage of such code has actually been
-*increasing*.

package/node_modules_lambda/safer-buffer/Readme.md

@@ -1,156 +0,0 @@
-# safer-buffer [![travis][travis-image]][travis-url] [![npm][npm-image]][npm-url] [![javascript style guide][standard-image]][standard-url] [![Security Responsible Disclosure][secuirty-image]][secuirty-url]
-
-[travis-image]: https://travis-ci.org/ChALkeR/safer-buffer.svg?branch=master
-[travis-url]: https://travis-ci.org/ChALkeR/safer-buffer
-[npm-image]: https://img.shields.io/npm/v/safer-buffer.svg
-[npm-url]: https://npmjs.org/package/safer-buffer
-[standard-image]: https://img.shields.io/badge/code_style-standard-brightgreen.svg
-[standard-url]: https://standardjs.com
-[secuirty-image]: https://img.shields.io/badge/Security-Responsible%20Disclosure-green.svg
-[secuirty-url]: https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/processes/responsible_disclosure_template.md
-
-Modern Buffer API polyfill without footguns, working on Node.js from 0.8 to current.
-
-## How to use?
-
-First, port all `Buffer()` and `new Buffer()` calls to `Buffer.alloc()` and `Buffer.from()` API.
-
-Then, to achieve compatibility with outdated Node.js versions (`<4.5.0` and 5.x `<5.9.0`), use
-`const Buffer = require('safer-buffer').Buffer` in all files where you make calls to the new
-Buffer API. _Use `var` instead of `const` if you need that for your Node.js version range support._
-
-Also, see the
-[porting Buffer](https://github.com/ChALkeR/safer-buffer/blob/master/Porting-Buffer.md) guide.
-
-## Do I need it?
-
-Hopefully, not — dropping support for outdated Node.js versions should be fine nowdays, and that
-is the recommended path forward. You _do_ need to port to the `Buffer.alloc()` and `Buffer.from()`
-though.
-
-See the [porting guide](https://github.com/ChALkeR/safer-buffer/blob/master/Porting-Buffer.md)
-for a better description.
-
-## Why not [safe-buffer](https://npmjs.com/safe-buffer)?
-
-_In short: while `safe-buffer` serves as a polyfill for the new API, it allows old API usage and
-itself contains footguns._
-
-`safe-buffer` could be used safely to get the new API while still keeping support for older
-Node.js versions (like this module), but while analyzing ecosystem usage of the old Buffer API
-I found out that `safe-buffer` is itself causing problems in some cases.
-
-For example, consider the following snippet:
-
-```console
-$ cat example.unsafe.js
-console.log(Buffer(20))
-$ ./node-v6.13.0-linux-x64/bin/node example.unsafe.js
-<Buffer 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 28 13 de 02 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00>
-$ standard example.unsafe.js
-standard: Use JavaScript Standard Style (https://standardjs.com)
-  /home/chalker/repo/safer-buffer/example.unsafe.js:2:13: 'Buffer()' was deprecated since v6. Use 'Buffer.alloc()' or 'Buffer.from()' (use 'https://www.npmjs.com/package/safe-buffer' for '<4.5.0') instead.
-```
-
-This is allocates and writes to console an uninitialized chunk of memory.
-[standard](https://www.npmjs.com/package/standard) linter (among others) catch that and warn people
-to avoid using unsafe API.
-
-Let's now throw in `safe-buffer`!
-
-```console
-$ cat example.safe-buffer.js
-const Buffer = require('safe-buffer').Buffer
-console.log(Buffer(20))
-$ standard example.safe-buffer.js
-$ ./node-v6.13.0-linux-x64/bin/node example.safe-buffer.js
-<Buffer 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 28 58 01 82 fe 7f 00 00 00 00 00 00>
-```
-
-See the problem? Adding in `safe-buffer` _magically removes the lint warning_, but the behavior
-remains identiсal to what we had before, and when launched on Node.js 6.x LTS — this dumps out
-chunks of uninitialized memory.
-_And this code will still emit runtime warnings on Node.js 10.x and above._
-
-That was done by design. I first considered changing `safe-buffer`, prohibiting old API usage or
-emitting warnings on it, but that significantly diverges from `safe-buffer` design. After some
-discussion, it was decided to move my approach into a separate package, and _this is that separate
-package_.
-
-This footgun is not imaginary — I observed top-downloaded packages doing that kind of thing,
-«fixing» the lint warning by blindly including `safe-buffer` without any actual changes.
-
-Also in some cases, even if the API _was_ migrated to use of safe Buffer API — a random pull request
-can bring unsafe Buffer API usage back to the codebase by adding new calls — and that could go
-unnoticed even if you have a linter prohibiting that (becase of the reason stated above), and even
-pass CI. _I also observed that being done in popular packages._
-
-Some examples:
- * [webdriverio](https://github.com/webdriverio/webdriverio/commit/05cbd3167c12e4930f09ef7cf93b127ba4effae4#diff-124380949022817b90b622871837d56cR31)
-   (a module with 548 759 downloads/month),
- * [websocket-stream](https://github.com/maxogden/websocket-stream/commit/c9312bd24d08271687d76da0fe3c83493871cf61)
-   (218 288 d/m, fix in [maxogden/websocket-stream#142](https://github.com/maxogden/websocket-stream/pull/142)),
- * [node-serialport](https://github.com/node-serialport/node-serialport/commit/e8d9d2b16c664224920ce1c895199b1ce2def48c)
-   (113 138 d/m, fix in [node-serialport/node-serialport#1510](https://github.com/node-serialport/node-serialport/pull/1510)),
- * [karma](https://github.com/karma-runner/karma/commit/3d94b8cf18c695104ca195334dc75ff054c74eec)
-   (3 973 193 d/m, fix in [karma-runner/karma#2947](https://github.com/karma-runner/karma/pull/2947)),
- * [spdy-transport](https://github.com/spdy-http2/spdy-transport/commit/5375ac33f4a62a4f65bcfc2827447d42a5dbe8b1)
-   (5 970 727 d/m, fix in [spdy-http2/spdy-transport#53](https://github.com/spdy-http2/spdy-transport/pull/53)).
- * And there are a lot more over the ecosystem.
-
-I filed a PR at
-[mysticatea/eslint-plugin-node#110](https://github.com/mysticatea/eslint-plugin-node/pull/110) to
-partially fix that (for cases when that lint rule is used), but it is a semver-major change for
-linter rules and presets, so it would take significant time for that to reach actual setups.
-_It also hasn't been released yet (2018-03-20)._
-
-Also, `safer-buffer` discourages the usage of `.allocUnsafe()`, which is often done by a mistake.
-It still supports it with an explicit concern barier, by placing it under
-`require('safer-buffer/dangereous')`.
-
-## But isn't throwing bad?
-
-Not really. It's an error that could be noticed and fixed early, instead of causing havoc later like
-unguarded `new Buffer()` calls that end up receiving user input can do.
-
-This package affects only the files where `var Buffer = require('safer-buffer').Buffer` was done, so
-it is really simple to keep track of things and make sure that you don't mix old API usage with that.
-Also, CI should hint anything that you might have missed.
-
-New commits, if tested, won't land new usage of unsafe Buffer API this way.
-_Node.js 10.x also deals with that by printing a runtime depecation warning._
-
-### Would it affect third-party modules?
-
-No, unless you explicitly do an awful thing like monkey-patching or overriding the built-in `Buffer`.
-Don't do that.
-
-### But I don't want throwing…
-
-That is also fine!
-
-Also, it could be better in some cases when you don't comprehensive enough test coverage.
-
-In that case — just don't override `Buffer` and use
-`var SaferBuffer = require('safer-buffer').Buffer` instead.
-
-That way, everything using `Buffer` natively would still work, but there would be two drawbacks:
-
-* `Buffer.from`/`Buffer.alloc` won't be polyfilled — use `SaferBuffer.from` and
-  `SaferBuffer.alloc` instead.
-* You are still open to accidentally using the insecure deprecated API — use a linter to catch that.
-
-Note that using a linter to catch accidential `Buffer` constructor usage in this case is strongly
-recommended. `Buffer` is not overriden in this usecase, so linters won't get confused.
-
-## «Without footguns»?
-
-Well, it is still possible to do _some_ things with `Buffer` API, e.g. accessing `.buffer` property
-on older versions and duping things from there. You shouldn't do that in your code, probabably.
-
-The intention is to remove the most significant footguns that affect lots of packages in the
-ecosystem, and to do it in the proper way.
-
-Also, this package doesn't protect against security issues affecting some Node.js versions, so for
-usage in your own production code, it is still recommended to update to a Node.js version
-[supported by upstream](https://github.com/nodejs/release#release-schedule).

package/node_modules_lambda/safer-buffer/dangerous.js

@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-/* eslint-disable node/no-deprecated-api */
-
-'use strict'
-
-var buffer = require('buffer')
-var Buffer = buffer.Buffer
-var safer = require('./safer.js')
-var Safer = safer.Buffer
-
-var dangerous = {}
-
-var key
-
-for (key in safer) {
-  if (!safer.hasOwnProperty(key)) continue
-  dangerous[key] = safer[key]
-}
-
-var Dangereous = dangerous.Buffer = {}
-
-// Copy Safer API
-for (key in Safer) {
-  if (!Safer.hasOwnProperty(key)) continue
-  Dangereous[key] = Safer[key]
-}
-
-// Copy those missing unsafe methods, if they are present
-for (key in Buffer) {
-  if (!Buffer.hasOwnProperty(key)) continue
-  if (Dangereous.hasOwnProperty(key)) continue
-  Dangereous[key] = Buffer[key]
-}
-
-if (!Dangereous.allocUnsafe) {
-  Dangereous.allocUnsafe = function (size) {
-    if (typeof size !== 'number') {
-      throw new TypeError('The "size" argument must be of type number. Received type ' + typeof size)
-    }
-    if (size < 0 || size >= 2 * (1 << 30)) {
-      throw new RangeError('The value "' + size + '" is invalid for option "size"')
-    }
-    return Buffer(size)
-  }
-}
-
-if (!Dangereous.allocUnsafeSlow) {
-  Dangereous.allocUnsafeSlow = function (size) {
-    if (typeof size !== 'number') {
-      throw new TypeError('The "size" argument must be of type number. Received type ' + typeof size)
-    }
-    if (size < 0 || size >= 2 * (1 << 30)) {
-      throw new RangeError('The value "' + size + '" is invalid for option "size"')
-    }
-    return buffer.SlowBuffer(size)
-  }
-}
-
-module.exports = dangerous

package/node_modules_lambda/safer-buffer/package.json

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "name": "safer-buffer",
-  "version": "2.1.2",
-  "description": "Modern Buffer API polyfill without footguns",
-  "main": "safer.js",
-  "scripts": {
-    "browserify-test": "browserify --external tape tests.js > browserify-tests.js && tape browserify-tests.js",
-    "test": "standard && tape tests.js"
-  },
-  "author": {
-    "name": "Nikita Skovoroda",
-    "email": "chalkerx@gmail.com",
-    "url": "https://github.com/ChALkeR"
-  },
-  "license": "MIT",
-  "repository": {
-    "type": "git",
-    "url": "git+https://github.com/ChALkeR/safer-buffer.git"
-  },
-  "bugs": {
-    "url": "https://github.com/ChALkeR/safer-buffer/issues"
-  },
-  "devDependencies": {
-    "standard": "^11.0.1",
-    "tape": "^4.9.0"
-  },
-  "files": [
-    "Porting-Buffer.md",
-    "Readme.md",
-    "tests.js",
-    "dangerous.js",
-    "safer.js"
-  ]
-}

package/node_modules_lambda/safer-buffer/safer.js

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-/* eslint-disable node/no-deprecated-api */
-
-'use strict'
-
-var buffer = require('buffer')
-var Buffer = buffer.Buffer
-
-var safer = {}
-
-var key
-
-for (key in buffer) {
-  if (!buffer.hasOwnProperty(key)) continue
-  if (key === 'SlowBuffer' || key === 'Buffer') continue
-  safer[key] = buffer[key]
-}
-
-var Safer = safer.Buffer = {}
-for (key in Buffer) {
-  if (!Buffer.hasOwnProperty(key)) continue
-  if (key === 'allocUnsafe' || key === 'allocUnsafeSlow') continue
-  Safer[key] = Buffer[key]
-}
-
-safer.Buffer.prototype = Buffer.prototype
-
-if (!Safer.from || Safer.from === Uint8Array.from) {
-  Safer.from = function (value, encodingOrOffset, length) {
-    if (typeof value === 'number') {
-      throw new TypeError('The "value" argument must not be of type number. Received type ' + typeof value)
-    }
-    if (value && typeof value.length === 'undefined') {
-      throw new TypeError('The first argument must be one of type string, Buffer, ArrayBuffer, Array, or Array-like Object. Received type ' + typeof value)
-    }
-    return Buffer(value, encodingOrOffset, length)
-  }
-}
-
-if (!Safer.alloc) {
-  Safer.alloc = function (size, fill, encoding) {
-    if (typeof size !== 'number') {
-      throw new TypeError('The "size" argument must be of type number. Received type ' + typeof size)
-    }
-    if (size < 0 || size >= 2 * (1 << 30)) {
-      throw new RangeError('The value "' + size + '" is invalid for option "size"')
-    }
-    var buf = Buffer(size)
-    if (!fill || fill.length === 0) {
-      buf.fill(0)
-    } else if (typeof encoding === 'string') {
-      buf.fill(fill, encoding)
-    } else {
-      buf.fill(fill)
-    }
-    return buf
-  }
-}
-
-if (!safer.kStringMaxLength) {
-  try {
-    safer.kStringMaxLength = process.binding('buffer').kStringMaxLength
-  } catch (e) {
-    // we can't determine kStringMaxLength in environments where process.binding
-    // is unsupported, so let's not set it
-  }
-}
-
-if (!safer.constants) {
-  safer.constants = {
-    MAX_LENGTH: safer.kMaxLength
-  }
-  if (safer.kStringMaxLength) {
-    safer.constants.MAX_STRING_LENGTH = safer.kStringMaxLength
-  }
-}
-
-module.exports = safer