@zibby/skills 0.2.22 → 0.2.24

package/docs/concepts/designing-agents.md

@@ -1,247 +0,0 @@
----
-sidebar_position: 7
-title: Designing agents
----
-
-# Designing agents
-
-Before you build an agent, learn the three patterns that make Zibby agents
-powerful. Almost every good agent is some combination of them:
-
-1. **One agent, many entry points** — a single deployed agent that behaves
-   differently depending on *how* it was triggered (cron vs. a human vs. a
-   webhook), selected by a code **router** node.
-2. **Zero-LLM code nodes that read & write Stores** — deterministic work
-   (fetch, ETL, aggregate, persist) runs as plain code, no model call, and can
-   read/write a Store (SQLite / file / dataset) directly.
-3. **Event-driven agents** — one agent subscribes to several events (PR opened,
-   comment, `@mention`) and routes each to the right branch.
-
-These are not exotic. The shipped **sentry-triage** and **engineering-insights**
-agents use all three at once. Study them — they are the canonical reference for
-"how an agent should be designed."
-
-:::tip Design rule
-**Don't reach for an LLM node when plain code will do.** A model call costs
-tokens, adds latency, and is non-deterministic. Fetching data, transforming
-JSON, running a query, writing to a Store, calling an API — all of that belongs
-in a **code node**. Reserve LLM nodes for judgment: classify, summarize, decide.
-:::
-
----
-
-## Pattern 1 — one agent, many entry points
-
-The trap beginners fall into is building *two* agents: a "collector" that runs on
-a schedule and a "reporter" a human triggers. Don't. Build **one** agent whose
-**first node is a code router** that inspects the trigger and sends the run down
-the right branch. One bundle, one deployment, one set of env/Store bindings.
-
-```js
-import { WorkflowGraph } from '@zibby/agent-workflow';
-import { z } from '@zibby/core';
-
-// The router is PURE CODE — no model call. It reads the trigger input off state
-// and returns the name of the next node.
-function route(state) {
-  // state.trigger / state.mode / state.action come from the trigger payload,
-  // spread onto the initial state by the runner.
-  return state?.trigger === 'fix' ? 'fix_intake' : 'fetch_issues';
-}
-
-const graph = new WorkflowGraph()
-  .addNode('route', {
-    _isCustomCode: true,
-    description: 'Routes on the trigger: "fix" runs the single-issue auto-fix branch, anything else runs the scheduled triage branch.',
-    outputSchema: z.object({}).passthrough(),
-    execute: async (ctx) => ctx.state.getAll(), // router only decides an edge; it forwards state
-  })
-  // …branch nodes…
-  .setEntryPoint('route')
-  // A conditional edge: run `route`, then take the edge its return value names.
-  .addConditionalEdges('route', route, {
-    labels: { fix_intake: 'auto-fix one issue', fetch_issues: 'scheduled triage' },
-  });
-```
-
-The **same agent** then gets three trigger sources, all landing on `route`:
-
-| Trigger | Payload | Branch it takes |
-|---|---|---|
-| Cron (nightly) | `{ mode: 'collect' }` | collect → persist to Store |
-| Human `zibby agent trigger` | `{ action: 'report' }` | read Store → generate → deliver |
-| Webhook / Lark `@bot` | `{ trigger: 'fix', issueId }` | single-item fix branch |
-
-> **Real reference:** `sentry-triage` routes `state.trigger === 'fix'` to an
-> auto-fix branch and everything else (incl. an absent trigger — the nightly
-> cron) to scheduled triage. `engineering-insights` routes `state.action`
-> between `collect` (meter commits → SQLite) and `report` (aggregate → charts).
-
----
-
-## Pattern 2 — code nodes read & write Stores (no LLM)
-
-A **code node** (`_isCustomCode: true` + an `execute` function) is a first-class
-citizen. It runs in the same container as the rest of the graph and has the same
-environment — including any **Store** bound to the node. So a deterministic node
-can fetch from a Store, transform, and write results back, entirely without a
-model.
-
-### How a node reaches a Store
-
-When you bind a Store to a node (via `zibby_set_node_stores`, the deploy modal,
-or the CLI), the runtime injects three env vars into that node's container:
-
-| Env var | What it is |
-|---|---|
-| `ZIBBY_STORE__<name>` | the **storeId** of the Store you bound as `<name>` |
-| `ZIBBY_ACCOUNT_API_URL` | the base URL of the datasets API |
-| `PROJECT_API_TOKEN` | a project-scoped bearer token |
-
-The node just `fetch`es the datasets API. No SDK required.
-
-```js
-// A pure-code node: read from a SQLite Store, write to a file Store. Zero LLM.
-const BASE  = process.env.ZIBBY_ACCOUNT_API_URL;
-const TOKEN = process.env.PROJECT_API_TOKEN;
-
-async function ds(storeId, action, body) {
-  const r = await fetch(`${BASE}/datasets/stores/${encodeURIComponent(storeId)}/${action}`, {
-    method: 'POST',
-    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', Authorization: `Bearer ${TOKEN}` },
-    body: JSON.stringify(body),
-  });
-  if (!r.ok) throw new Error(`${action} ${r.status}: ${await r.text()}`);
-  return r.json();
-}
-
-graph.addNode('build_report', {
-  _isCustomCode: true,
-  description: 'Reads metrics from a SQLite Store, writes the rendered report to a file Store. Pure code — no model call.',
-  outputSchema: z.object({ topDevs: z.array(z.any()), wrote: z.boolean() }),
-  execute: async (ctx) => {
-    const state      = ctx.state.getAll();
-    const metricsDb  = process.env.ZIBBY_STORE__metrics_db;    // a sqlite Store
-    const reportFile = process.env.ZIBBY_STORE__report_files;  // a file Store
-
-    // ── SQLite READ ── (readOnly:true → read-only guard)
-    const q = await ds(metricsDb, 'sql', {
-      sql: 'SELECT dev, added FROM commits WHERE added > ? ORDER BY added DESC LIMIT 10',
-      params: [100],
-      readOnly: true,
-    });
-    // q = { columns: ['dev','added'], rows: [['alice', 420], …] }
-
-    // ── SQLite WRITE ── (bound params; a brand-new table is created STRICT)
-    await ds(metricsDb, 'sql', {
-      sql: 'INSERT INTO runs (ran_at, top_dev) VALUES (?, ?)',
-      params: [state.ranAt, q.rows[0]?.[0] ?? null],
-    });
-
-    // ── file WRITE / READ ──
-    await ds(reportFile, 'put', { path: 'report.html', content: state.html });
-    const tpl = await ds(reportFile, 'get', { path: 'template.html' });
-
-    return { topDevs: q.rows, wrote: true };
-  },
-});
-```
-
-### The Store data actions
-
-| Store type | Actions | Notes |
-|---|---|---|
-| `sqlite` | `sql` `{ sql, params?, readOnly? }` | a real relational DB — tables, joins, UPDATEs. `readOnly: true` refuses any write. New tables are created **STRICT** so a column's declared type is enforced. |
-| `file` | `put` / `get` / `list` / `delete` `{ path, content? }` | arbitrary blobs by relative path — good for whole-JSON inputs and rendered outputs. |
-| `dataset` | `append` `{ record }` / `query` `{ select?, where?, … }` | append-only records + SQL-style aggregation — good for raw event streams you later `count`/`sum`/`group`. |
-
-:::tip Choosing a Store type by data shape
-- **Whole-blob** (a JSON file a script reads with `readFileSync`, a rendered
-  report) → **file**.
-- **Rows you dedupe / update / join** (git commits keyed by SHA) → **sqlite**.
-- **Append-only events you aggregate later** (MRs, worklogs) → **dataset**.
-- **A tiny cursor** ("where did I get to last time") → **kv-memory** (built into
-  every agent, not a registry Store).
-:::
-
-### File-store size limit — and how to handle big files
-
-A `file` store's per-file cap is **4 MiB of raw bytes** (the content travels
-base64-inside-JSON through the API). Two ways past it:
-
-- **A relational/append-only shape? Use `sqlite`/`dataset`, not `file`.** Those
-  aren't whole-file uploads — they take rows/records, so the 4 MiB blob cap
-  doesn't apply. This is the right move for raw event data (commits, worklogs).
-- **A genuinely large blob** (a multi-MB `.jsonl` a script must read whole)?
-  **gzip it, transparently.** Text compresses well; store the compressed bytes
-  and decompress on read, so the generating script still sees the original file:
-
-  ```js
-  // write node: gzip + base64 → store as <name>.gz.b64
-  import { gzipSync } from 'node:zlib';
-  const packed = gzipSync(Buffer.from(rawText)).toString('base64'); // 5.6MB → ~0.8MB
-  await ds(fileStore, 'put', { path: 'big.jsonl.gz.b64', content: packed });
-
-  // read node: fetch → base64-decode → gunzip → original file on disk
-  import { gunzipSync } from 'node:zlib';
-  const got = await ds(fileStore, 'get', { path: 'big.jsonl.gz.b64' });
-  const raw = gunzipSync(Buffer.from(got.content, 'base64')).toString('utf8');
-  ```
-
-  Keep the list of "which files are compressed" as data (one array), so adding a
-  big file later is a one-line change — the read/write nodes stay generic.
-
-:::caution Check every dependency's SIZE up front
-When you list a store's inputs, don't glob one extension and assume — a single
-oversized dependency (e.g. a 5.6 MB `.jsonl` hiding among small `.json`s) is what
-trips the cap. Enumerate the real files + their bytes before wiring the store.
-File paths accept Unicode (`报告.html` is fine); only `/ \ : ? # [ ] " < > | *`
-and control characters are rejected.
-:::
-
-### Debugging a self-host run when logs look truncated
-
-Self-host truncates long per-node step logs, so a node can report `success`
-while a downstream step silently failed (you see all-green but empty output).
-The robust pattern: **have each node persist its own full result JSON into an
-output store** (e.g. `diag/<node>.json`) — best-effort, never throwing, never
-changing the node's return value. Then read the diagnostics back with
-`zibby_store_peek` to see exactly what each node saw (staged files + sizes,
-stderr, the real error). This turns a silent all-green failure into a precise
-root cause.
-
----
-
-## Pattern 3 — event-driven agents
-
-A single agent can subscribe to **several** events and handle each differently.
-The shipped **github-code-review** / **gitlab-code-review** agents are one agent
-that reacts to *PR opened*, *new commits pushed*, *a comment reply*, and an
-*`@mention`* — the entry router branches on which event fired. The owner even
-chooses **which** events trigger a review (cost control), because the whole thing
-is just an event-subscription subset feeding the same router.
-
-The takeaway: **you rarely need a second agent for a new trigger.** Add an event
-to the subscription, add a branch, extend the router.
-
----
-
-## Putting it together — a design checklist
-
-When you design a new agent, ask:
-
-1. **How many ways will this be triggered?** More than one → **Pattern 1**: a
-   code `route` node at the entry, one agent, branches per scenario.
-2. **What here is deterministic?** Fetch / transform / query / persist → **code
-   nodes** (Pattern 2), not LLM nodes. Bind the Stores those nodes need.
-3. **What actually needs judgment?** Only *those* steps get an LLM node
-   (`agent: 'claude' | 'codex' | …` + a `prompt` + an `outputSchema`).
-4. **Where does the data live?** Pick a Store type per data shape (blob → file,
-   relational → sqlite, append-only → dataset; cursor → kv-memory).
-5. **Is the split write-side vs. read-side?** Keep it **one agent** — a nightly
-   `collect` branch that writes the Store and an on-demand `report` branch that
-   reads it, selected by the router. Not two agents.
-
-Then read the source of **sentry-triage** and **engineering-insights** and map
-each pattern onto what you see. That is the fastest way to learn what Zibby can
-do.

package/docs/concepts/graph.md

@@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
----
-sidebar_position: 1
-title: Graph & nodes
----
-
-# Graph & nodes
-
-A **graph** is a directed graph of agent invocations. You declare it in code:
-
-```js
-import { WorkflowGraph } from '@zibby/agent-workflow';
-import { z } from '@zibby/core';
-
-const graph = new WorkflowGraph()
-  .addNode('plan',     { prompt: 'List 3 tasks for: {{goal}}', outputSchema: Plan,   agent: 'claude' })
-  .addNode('execute',  { prompt: 'Do task: {{task}}',           outputSchema: Done,   agent: 'cursor' })
-  .addNode('verify',   { prompt: 'Verify: {{result}}',          outputSchema: Status, agent: 'codex'  })
-  .addEdge('plan', 'execute')
-  .addEdge('execute', 'verify')
-  .setEntryPoint('plan');
-```
-
-## Node config
-
-Every node accepts:
-
-| Field | Required | Description |
-|---|---|---|
-| `prompt` | yes | Either a string template (`{{state.X}}` interpolated) or a function `({ input, state }) => string`. |
-| `outputSchema` | yes | A Zod schema. The node's output is validated against this before downstream nodes see it. Validation failure = node failure. |
-| `agent` | no | Agent strategy override: `'cursor' | 'claude' | 'codex' | 'gemini' | 'assistant'`. Falls back to project default if omitted. |
-| `retries` | no | Number of times to retry on failure (default: 0). |
-| `skills` | no | Array of skill IDs to enable for this node — see [Skills](./skills). |
-| `onComplete` | no | Async callback invoked with the node's validated output. |
-
-## Edges
-
-Three forms:
-
-```js
-// Linear: A → B
-graph.addEdge('A', 'B');
-
-// Conditional branching: state-driven routing
-graph.addConditionalEdges('classify', (state) => {
-  if (state.classify.severity === 'critical') return 'pageOncall';
-  if (state.classify.severity === 'high')     return 'createIncident';
-  return 'logAndExit';
-});
-
-// Multi-conditional with named labels (cleaner for many branches)
-graph.addConditionalEdges('classify', {
-  routes: (state) => state.classify.severity,
-  labels: { critical: 'pageOncall', high: 'createIncident', _default: 'logAndExit' },
-});
-```
-
-## Entry point
-
-Exactly one node is the entry point:
-
-```js
-graph.setEntryPoint('plan');
-```
-
-This is the node that runs first when `graph.run(initialState)` is called.
-
-## Running
-
-```js
-const { state } = await graph.run(agent, {
-  input: { goal: 'add a dark-mode toggle' },
-  agentType: 'cursor',
-});
-
-console.log(state.verify.status);
-```
-
-Each node's output lands at `state[nodeName]`, so downstream prompts can reference `{{state.plan.tasks}}` or `state.plan.tasks` from a function prompt.
-
-## State immutability
-
-State is append-only — every node-completion creates a new state object. Earlier values are preserved in the state's `_history` array, accessible via `state.rollback(N)` for retries that need to drop the latest N writes.

package/docs/concepts/sessions.md

@@ -1,70 +0,0 @@
----
-sidebar_position: 5
-title: Sessions & artifacts
----
-
-# Sessions & artifacts
-
-Every agent run — local or cloud — produces a **session folder** under `.zibby/output/sessions/<sessionId>/`. The folder is the canonical record of what happened.
-
-## What's inside
-
-```
-.zibby/output/sessions/1777678254943_ymcw/
-├── result.json              # final structured output (Zod-validated)
-├── raw_stream_output.txt    # every byte the agent emitted, raw
-├── events.json              # JSONL execution log: per-node start/end, validation, retries
-├── .session-info.json       # session metadata (start time, agent, model, workflow type)
-└── nodes/
-    ├── plan/
-    │   ├── prompt.txt         # exact prompt sent to the agent
-    │   ├── raw_output.txt     # what the agent returned, pre-validation
-    │   └── result.json        # the validated output
-    ├── implement/...
-    └── verify/...
-```
-
-## Session IDs
-
-Format: `<unix_ms>_<random>`. Generated when the graph starts running.
-
-You can override via:
-
-```bash
-zibby agent run my-agent --session 1777678254943_ymcw
-```
-
-Useful for replay — re-run from a saved input/state without re-paying earlier nodes.
-
-## Replay a session
-
-```bash
-zibby agent run my-agent \
-  --session 1777678254943_ymcw \
-  --node verify   # only re-run the 'verify' node
-```
-
-The graph reads `state.plan` and `state.implement` from the saved session and only invokes `verify` again. Cheap iteration on the last node when debugging.
-
-## Cloud sessions
-
-Cloud runs land in the same `.zibby/output/sessions/` layout, just inside the ECS container's `/workspace/`. The session folder is uploaded to S3 at the end of each run; `zibby agent logs <uuid> -t` streams CloudWatch logs in real time.
-
-To download a finished cloud session locally:
-
-```bash
-zibby agent download <uuid>
-```
-
-This pulls the agent source (so you can edit and redeploy) plus the most recent execution's session folder.
-
-## Studio integration
-
-[Zibby Studio](https://zibby.app) is a desktop UI that watches `.zibby/output/sessions/`. Anything that writes a session folder shows up in Studio automatically — pin a session, watch state evolve live, or stop an agent from the Stop button.
-
-The protocol is documented and stable:
-
-- `__WORKFLOW_GRAPH_LOG__` markers in stdout signal node begin/end events
-- `.zibby-studio-stop` file is the kill switch — Studio writes it, the runtime checks for it between nodes
-- `ZIBBY_RUN_SOURCE=studio` env var tells the runtime "you were spawned by Studio"
-- `stoppedByStudio: true` returned from `graph.run()` when the kill switch fired

package/docs/concepts/skills.md

@@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
----
-sidebar_position: 4
-title: Skills
----
-
-# Skills
-
-A **skill** is a named bundle of MCP tools (and optional prompt fragments) that a node can opt into. Skills let you compose tool access per-node without giving every node every tool.
-
-See also: [Skills reference](../skills/index.md) for per-skill docs (tools, setup, code samples).
-
-## Built-in skills
-
-`@zibby/skills` ships these:
-
-| Skill ID | What it adds |
-|---|---|
-| `browser` | Playwright MCP — browse, click, fill, screenshot |
-| `github` | GitHub MCP — issues, PRs, file edits, branches |
-| `jira` | Jira MCP — tickets, comments, transitions |
-| `slack` | Slack MCP — read/write channels, threads, DMs |
-| `memory` | Test memory database — version-controlled (Dolt) knowledge from prior runs |
-
-## Enabling on a node
-
-```js
-import { registerSkill } from '@zibby/agent-workflow';
-import { browserSkill } from '@zibby/skills';
-
-registerSkill(browserSkill);
-
-graph.addNode('research', {
-  prompt: 'Find pricing for {{input.product}}',
-  outputSchema: Price,
-  agent: 'cursor',
-  skills: ['browser'],
-});
-```
-
-Two effects:
-1. The agent gets the Browser MCP tools at this node only.
-2. The skill's prompt fragment (telling the agent how to use the tools) is appended to the prompt.
-
-## Custom skills
-
-Implement the `Skill` shape:
-
-```js
-import { registerSkill } from '@zibby/agent-workflow';
-
-registerSkill({
-  id: 'pdf',
-  serverName: 'pdf-mcp',
-  tools: ['pdfExtract', 'pdfRender'],
-  promptFragment: 'When working with PDFs, use the pdfExtract tool first.',
-});
-```
-
-Now any node can opt in via `skills: ['pdf']`.
-
-## Why per-node, not per-graph?
-
-Two reasons:
-
-- **Tool scoping** — a node that's planning shouldn't have Slack write access; a node that's posting status shouldn't have file-write tools. Per-node skills give you least-privilege automatically.
-- **Prompt size** — every enabled skill adds prompt fragments. Don't pay for tools you won't use.
-
-## Function skills (no MCP server needed)
-
-For lightweight cases, register a function skill:
-
-```js
-import { registerSkill } from '@zibby/agent-workflow';
-
-registerSkill({
-  id: 'pricing',
-  type: 'function',
-  fn: async ({ product }) => {
-    const r = await fetch(`https://my.api/price?p=${product}`);
-    return r.json();
-  },
-  description: 'Look up product pricing.',
-});
-```
-
-The agent sees `pricing` as a callable tool, gets your function's return value back as a tool result. No MCP server to spin up.

package/docs/concepts/state.md

@@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
----
-sidebar_position: 3
-title: State & schema
----
-
-# State & schema
-
-Every agent run carries one **state** object that flows from node to node. State is the only handoff mechanism — there's no shared globals, no hidden context.
-
-## Shape
-
-```js
-state = {
-  input: { /* whatever the trigger passed */ },
-  plan: { tasks: ['t1', 't2'] },        // ← from node 'plan'
-  implement: { diff: '...' },            // ← from node 'implement'
-  verify: { status: 'ok' },              // ← from node 'verify'
-}
-```
-
-When a node completes, its validated output lands at `state[nodeName]`.
-
-## Schema-validated handoff
-
-Every node's `outputSchema` is a Zod schema. It runs *before* downstream nodes see the output:
-
-```js
-import { z } from '@zibby/core';
-
-const Plan = z.object({
-  tasks: z.array(z.string()).min(1),
-  priority: z.enum(['low', 'normal', 'high']),
-});
-
-graph.addNode('plan', {
-  prompt: 'Triage this ticket.',
-  outputSchema: Plan,
-  agent: 'claude',
-});
-```
-
-If the agent returns malformed output, the node fails. Combined with `retries: N`, you get cheap automatic recovery from one-off LLM hallucinations.
-
-Downstream nodes can reference plan output directly:
-
-```js
-graph.addNode('implement', {
-  prompt: ({ state }) => `Implement these tasks:\n${state.plan.tasks.map(t => `- ${t}`).join('\n')}`,
-  outputSchema: Implementation,
-  agent: 'cursor',
-});
-```
-
-## Function vs. template prompts
-
-Two prompt forms:
-
-```js
-// String template — variables interpolated from state.
-graph.addNode('plan', { prompt: 'Plan: {{input.goal}}', ... });
-
-// Function — full programmatic control.
-graph.addNode('plan', {
-  prompt: ({ input, state }) => {
-    const ctx = state.context?.summary ?? '';
-    return `Plan: ${input.goal}\n\nContext:\n${ctx}`;
-  },
-  ...
-});
-```
-
-Functions get `{ input, state, getAll, get }` so they can introspect state without throwing on missing keys.
-
-## Skill hints
-
-If a node opts into [skills](./skills), the framework appends prompt fragments that tell the agent how to use those tools. You don't write that boilerplate — register the skill once, list it on the node:
-
-```js
-graph.addNode('search', {
-  prompt: 'Find info about {{input.query}}',
-  outputSchema: Results,
-  agent: 'cursor',
-  skills: ['browser'],   // appends Browser MCP usage instructions to the prompt
-});
-```
-
-## Rollback
-
-State is history-tracked. To revert the last N writes (typical use case: a node validation passes Zod but the *content* is wrong, and you want to retry with extra instructions):
-
-```js
-const recovered = state.rollback(2);
-```
-
-`rollback` returns a fresh state with the last 2 writes dropped. Use it inside `onComplete` callbacks or custom retry logic.
-
-## Reading state in templates
-
-Inside the `prompt` string, `{{x}}` resolves first against `state.x`, then against `input.x`. Dotted paths work:
-
-```
-{{state.plan.tasks.length}}
-{{input.ticket}}
-```
-
-Function prompts give you the same access without the templating layer.