@zhushanwen/subagent-core 0.2.0

package/src/execution/__tests__/execute-and-await-worktree.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+// src/__tests__/execute-and-await-worktree.test.ts
+//
+// executeAndAwait 的 worktree 失败收尾测试（W1 code review 修复回归锁）。
+//
+// 覆盖：worktreeManager.create 抛错时 record 被 finalizeFailed（status→failed）且原错外抛。
+// （worktree 与 fork 解耦后，worktree:true+fork:false 的解耦验证见 subagent-service.test.ts。）
+//
+// ── mock 策略 ──
+//
+// 复用 execute-nesting.test.ts 的 spawn / node:fs / manifest-store / temp-prompt / alive-store
+// / finalized-marker mock 范式（见该文件头部详细注释）。本文件 **不驱动 FakeChild 完成**——
+// 被测的两个分支都在 runSpawn 之前抛/收尾（worktree create 在步骤 2.5，runSpawn 在步骤 5），
+// 因此 spawn 即使被调也无人驱动，测试在抛错后立即断言即可结束。
+//
+// worktreeManager 是 SubagentService 构造时 new 出的私有字段（WorktreeManager 实例，非模块）。
+// 测试 2 用 vi.spyOn(Reflect.get(service, "worktreeManager"), "create") 注入抛错，无需模块级 mock。
+
+import { PassThrough } from "node:stream";
+
+import { afterEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
+
+// ── mock modules（与 execute-nesting.test.ts 同范式）──
+
+vi.mock("node:child_process", async () => {
+  const { EventEmitter } = await import("node:events");
+  const { PassThrough } = await import("node:stream");
+
+  class FakeChild extends EventEmitter {
+    pid = 12345;
+    stdout = new PassThrough();
+    stderr = new PassThrough();
+    killed = false;
+    killSignal: string | undefined;
+    kill(sig?: string): boolean {
+      this.killed = true;
+      this.killSignal = sig;
+      return true;
+    }
+  }
+
+  return {
+    spawn: vi.fn(() => new FakeChild()),
+    // buildEnvBlock 的 git branch 调用（execFile 异步）：默认 err-first 兜底 → catch → branch=""
+    execFile: vi.fn(
+      (
+        _cmd: string,
+        _args: readonly string[],
+        _opts: unknown,
+        cb: (err: Error | null, stdout?: string, stderr?: string) => void,
+      ) => cb(new Error("execFile not configured in this test")),
+    ),
+  };
+});
+
+vi.mock("node:fs", async () => {
+  const actual = await import("node:fs");
+  return {
+    default: {
+      ...actual,
+      mkdirSync: vi.fn(),
+      existsSync: vi.fn(() => false),
+      appendFileSync: vi.fn(),
+      writeFileSync: vi.fn(),
+      readdirSync: vi.fn(() => []),
+    },
+    mkdirSync: vi.fn(),
+    existsSync: vi.fn(() => false),
+    appendFileSync: vi.fn(),
+    writeFileSync: vi.fn(),
+    readdirSync: vi.fn(() => []),
+    promises: actual.promises,
+  };
+});
+
+vi.mock("../alive-store.ts", async (importOriginal) => {
+  const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import("../alive-store.ts")>();
+  return {
+    ...actual,
+    writeAliveMarker: vi.fn(),
+    removeAliveMarker: vi.fn(),
+  };
+});
+
+vi.mock("../finalized-marker.ts", () => ({
+  writeFinalized: vi.fn(),
+  readFinalized: vi.fn(() => false),
+}));
+
+vi.mock("../manifest-store.ts", () => {
+  class FakeManifestStore {
+    writeManifest = vi.fn(async () => {});
+    readManifest = vi.fn(async () => null);
+    listAllSync = vi.fn(() => []);
+    recoverTmpFiles = vi.fn(async () => []);
+  }
+  return { ManifestStore: FakeManifestStore };
+});
+
+vi.mock("../temp-prompt.ts", () => ({
+  writePromptToTempFile: vi.fn(async (agent: string) => {
+    const safeName = agent.replace(/[^\w.-]+/g, "_");
+    return { dir: `/tmp/fake-${safeName}`, filePath: `/tmp/fake-${safeName}/prompt-${safeName}.md` };
+  }),
+  cleanupTempPrompt: vi.fn(async () => {}),
+}));
+
+import { ModelConfigService } from "../model-config-service.ts";
+import type { ModelInfo, ModelRegistryLike } from "../model-resolver.ts";
+import type { RecordStore } from "../record-store.ts";
+import type { WorktreeManager } from "../worktree-manager.ts";
+import { SubagentService } from "../subagent-service.ts";
+
+// ── 辅助：service 构造（与 execute-nesting.test.ts setup 等价）──
+
+function makeEmptyRegistry(): ModelRegistryLike {
+  return { getAvailable: () => [], find: () => undefined, hasConfiguredAuth: () => true };
+}
+
+function makePi() {
+  return { sendMessage: vi.fn(), appendEntry: vi.fn(), events: { emit: vi.fn() } };
+}
+
+interface SetupResult {
+  service: SubagentService;
+  worktreeManager: WorktreeManager;
+}
+
+function setup(): SetupResult {
+  const agentDir = "/tmp/exec-await-worktree-it"; // fs 已 mock，路径不需真实存在
+  const modelService = new ModelConfigService({ agentDir });
+  modelService.initModel({
+    modelRegistry: makeEmptyRegistry(),
+    sessionId: "exec-await-worktree-it",
+    ctxModel: { id: "m", name: "M", provider: "p", reasoning: false },
+  });
+  const service = new SubagentService({
+    cwd: agentDir,
+    modelService,
+    getMainSessionFile: () => "/mock/main-session.jsonl",
+  });
+  service.initSession({ pi: makePi(), sessionId: "exec-await-worktree-it" });
+  // worktreeManager 是 SubagentService 构造时 new 的 private 字段（无外部注入入口），
+  // 测试经 Reflect.get 访问后 cast 到生产导出类型 WorktreeManager（已在文件顶部 import），
+  // 让字段/方法签名与生产类型契约绑定。
+  const worktreeManager = Reflect.get(service, "worktreeManager") as WorktreeManager;
+  return { service, worktreeManager };
+}
+
+const ctxModel: ModelInfo = { id: "m", name: "M", provider: "p", reasoning: false };
+
+/**
+ * 从 service 取出 private store（断言 record 终态用）。
+ *
+ * worktreeManager 与 store 都是 SubagentService 构造时 new 出的 private 字段——
+ * 无外部注入入口，测试只能经 Reflect.get 访问。这里 cast 到生产导出类型
+ * （RecordStore / WorktreeManager）而非内联匿名 shape，让测试与生产类型契约绑定：
+ * 字段改名/签名变更时 tsc 立即报错（而非静默漂移）。
+ */
+function getStore(service: SubagentService): RecordStore {
+  return Reflect.get(service, "store") as RecordStore;
+}
+
+describe("executeAndAwait worktree 失败收尾", () => {
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vi.restoreAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  // ============================================================
+  // worktreeManager.create 抛错 → record 收尾为 failed + 原错外抛
+  // ============================================================
+  it("worktreeManager.create 失败时 finalizeFailed 收尾 record 并抛原错", async () => {
+    const { service, worktreeManager } = setup();
+
+    const createErr = new Error("worktree create boom");
+    vi.spyOn(worktreeManager, "create").mockImplementation(() => {
+      throw createErr;
+    });
+
+    // spy store.archive：finalizeFailed 真实收尾链（CAS→completeRecord→archive）的最末一步。
+    // 捕获传入 archive 的 record，断言其 status 已被推向 "failed"（证明 finalizeFailed 完整执行，
+    // 而非仅 tryTransition 中途返回）。archive 真实执行（不 mockImplementation）以保留移出 running map 的语义。
+    const store = getStore(service);
+    const archiveSpy = vi.spyOn(store, "archive");
+
+    await expect(
+      service.executeAndAwait({
+        task: "worktree create will fail",
+        slug: "worktree-create-fail",
+        worktree: true,
+        fork: true,
+        ctxModel,
+      }),
+    ).rejects.toBe(createErr);
+
+    // finalizeFailed 完整执行：record 经 CAS→completeRecord 推到 failed 终态后 archive。
+    expect(archiveSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    // store 现已强类型为 RecordStore → archive 入参为 ExecutionRecord，无需 `as` 断言。
+    const archivedRecord = archiveSpy.mock.calls[0]![0];
+    expect(archivedRecord.status).toBe("closed");
+    // archive 后 record 已移出 running map → listRunning 空、getMutable 取不到。
+    expect(store.listRunning()).toHaveLength(0);
+    expect(store.getMutable(archivedRecord.id)).toBeUndefined();
+  });
+
+  // ============================================================
+  // create-await 竞态守卫（Phase 2）：create await 窗口内 dispose 抢先把
+  // record CAS 成 closed → 守卫 cleanup + throw cancelled（失败 throw 语义，
+  // SAR.run 的 catch 会转 AgentResult.error）。守卫 throw 不落在 try 内
+  // （否则被上方 catch 当 create 失败再走 finalizeFailed，对已 closed record 语义未定义）。
+  // ============================================================
+  it("守卫：create await 窗口内 dispose 抢先 → cleanup 被调 + throw cancelled（不进 runAndFinalize）", async () => {
+    const { service, worktreeManager } = setup();
+
+    const handle = Object.freeze({
+      path: "/tmp/wt-guard2",
+      branch: "pi-sub-guard2",
+      baseCommit: "abc123",
+      mainCwd: "/repo",
+    }) as Parameters<WorktreeManager["cleanup"]>[0];
+    let resolveCreate!: (h: unknown) => void;
+    vi.spyOn(worktreeManager, "create").mockImplementation(
+      () => new Promise((r) => { resolveCreate = r; }) as ReturnType<WorktreeManager["create"]>,
+    );
+    const cleanupSpy = vi.spyOn(worktreeManager, "cleanup").mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+
+    const execP = service.executeAndAwait({
+      task: "guard test",
+      slug: "guard-test",
+      worktree: true,
+      fork: true,
+      ctxModel,
+    });
+    // 微任务推进：record 已建 + executeAndAwait 挂在 pending create 上
+    await new Promise((r) => { setTimeout(r, 0); });
+    // dispose 抢先：CAS running → closed（此刻 worktreeHandle 仍 undefined，
+    // dispose 的 fire-and-forget cleanup 跳过）——守卫是唯一清理点
+    service.disposeAllRecords("parent-shutdown");
+    resolveCreate(handle);
+
+    await expect(execP).rejects.toThrow("cancelled during worktree creation");
+    expect(cleanupSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(handle);
+  });
+});

package/src/execution/__tests__/execute-nesting.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+// src/__tests__/execute-nesting.test.ts
+//
+// D-030~D-033 嵌套 / 并发池 / 节流回归锁。独立于 execute-integration.test.ts。
+//
+// 用例：
+//   D-032  background 进并发池（分层配额：max(1, maxConcurrent - depth)）
+//   D-033  execute 入口通用嵌套护栏（execCtxAls 计 fork+非 fork 嵌套，深度>MAX 拒）
+//   （原「嵌套抑制 onUpdate」「节流清理 throttleState」用例组已随 onEventThrottled
+//   死路径删除一并移除——swf-perf-impl ledger #22 / cleanup-slice TC4）
+//
+// ── mock 策略 ──
+//
+// [关键] runSpawn（session-runner.ts）通过 child_process.spawn("pi",...) 启动子进程，
+//   事件经 stdout JSON 流回流。它 **不走 getSdk / createAgentSession**。
+//   因此本文件 mock 的是 node:child_process.spawn（返回 FakeChild），而非 getSdk/fakeSession
+//   （那是对 in-process run() 的旧 mock，在 spawn 改造后是死代码）。
+//
+//   mock 模式参考 run-spawn-integration.test.ts（该文件是 spawn 改造后的正确 mock 范式）：
+//     - node:child_process.spawn → FakeChild（EventEmitter + PassThrough），测试控制器
+//       emit stdout JSON 行（header + SdkEvent）/ stderr / close 时序。
+//     - node:child_process.execFile → err-first callback 默认兜底（buildEnvBlock 的 git
+//       branch 调用失败 → catch → branch=""，避免副作用）。
+//     - node:fs 同步方法 → mock（mkdirSync/existsSync/appendFileSync/writeFileSync/readdirSync），
+//       避免 sessionDir/sessionFile 触碰真实文件系统。
+//     - fs.promises.* → 保留真实实现（temp-prompt 整体被 mock，不触发真实 I/O）。
+//     - temp-prompt → mock（writePromptToTempFile 返回固定路径，消除 fake-timers flaky）。
+//     - alive-store.writeAliveMarker → mock（避免写 .alive sidecar）。
+//
+//   所有断言语义不变：它们测的是 SubagentService 的 **编排逻辑**
+//   （pool.acquire / execCtxAls 深度），这些逻辑
+//   无论事件来自 fakeSession.subscribe 还是 FakeChild.stdout 都一致。
+
+import type { PassThrough } from "node:stream";
+
+import { afterEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
+
+// ── mock modules ──
+//
+// vitest 会把 vi.mock 提升到文件顶部（早于其他 import / 声明）。mock 工厂若要引用
+// FakeChild，需在工厂内部 import（async 工厂可用 await import），而非引用顶部
+// 顶层 import（它们在 vi.mock 执行时尚未绑定）。
+
+vi.mock("node:child_process", async () => {
+  const { EventEmitter } = await import("node:events");
+  const { PassThrough } = await import("node:stream");
+
+  // FakeChild：模拟 ChildProcess（EventEmitter + PassThrough streams）。
+  // 测试通过 lastSpawnedChild() 取回实例，控制 emit stdout JSON 行 / close 时序。
+  class FakeChild extends EventEmitter {
+    pid = 12345;
+    stdout = new PassThrough();
+    stderr = new PassThrough();
+    killed = false;
+    killSignal: string | undefined;
+    kill(sig?: string): boolean {
+      this.killed = true;
+      this.killSignal = sig;
+      return true;
+    }
+  }
+
+  return {
+    spawn: vi.fn(() => new FakeChild()),
+    // buildEnvBlock 的 git branch 调用（execFile 异步）：默认 err-first 兜底 → catch → branch=""
+    execFile: vi.fn(
+      (
+        _cmd: string,
+        _args: readonly string[],
+        _opts: unknown,
+        cb: (err: Error | null, stdout?: string, stderr?: string) => void,
+      ) => cb(new Error("execFile not configured in this test")),
+    ),
+  };
+});
+
+// node:fs：同步方法 mock（runSpawn 用到的全部），promises 保留真实实现（temp-prompt 用）。
+vi.mock("node:fs", async () => {
+  const actual = await import("node:fs");
+  return {
+    default: {
+      ...actual,
+      mkdirSync: vi.fn(),
+      existsSync: vi.fn(() => false),
+      appendFileSync: vi.fn(),
+      writeFileSync: vi.fn(),
+      readdirSync: vi.fn(() => []),
+    },
+    // 具名导出与 default 保持一致
+    mkdirSync: vi.fn(),
+    existsSync: vi.fn(() => false),
+    appendFileSync: vi.fn(),
+    writeFileSync: vi.fn(),
+    readdirSync: vi.fn(() => []),
+    // promises 保留真实实现——temp-prompt 已被 mock（见下方 vi.mock），不再触发真实 I/O
+    promises: actual.promises,
+  };
+});
+
+// alive-store：mock writeAliveMarker（runSpawn 写 .alive sidecar）+ removeAliveMarker
+// （finalizeRecord 收尾删 .alive）。其余导出（readAliveMarker/isProcessAlive）保留真实实现
+// （worktree-manager/record-store 用，本组用例不涉及但保留以避免间接报错）。
+vi.mock("../alive-store.ts", async (importOriginal) => {
+  const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import("../alive-store.ts")>();
+  return {
+    ...actual,
+    writeAliveMarker: vi.fn(),
+    removeAliveMarker: vi.fn(),
+  };
+});
+
+// finalized-marker mock：避免真实 fs 写 sidecar（测试不关心 finalized 行为）
+vi.mock("../finalized-marker.ts", () => ({
+  writeFinalized: vi.fn(),
+  readFinalized: vi.fn(() => false),
+}));
+
+// manifest-store mock：writeManifest 用真实 fs.promises 写盘，但本文件 fs 同步方法已 mock
+// （目录从不真实创建）→ open/rename/unlink 全 ENOENT → bestEffort 异步 console.debug。
+// 这些延迟 console 通过 worker RPC（onUserConsoleLog）回流，与 vitest teardown 形成 race：
+// "Closing rpc while onUserConsoleLog was pending" → unhandled rejection / exit 1（flaky）。
+// 本组用例测编排逻辑（pool / depth / throttle），不测 manifest 持久化（有 manifest-store.test.ts
+// 独立覆盖）。故 mock 成 no-op，消除 teardown race 的根因——异步 console 输出。
+vi.mock("../manifest-store.ts", () => {
+  class FakeManifestStore {
+    writeManifest = vi.fn(async () => {});
+    readManifest = vi.fn(async () => null);
+    listAllSync = vi.fn(() => []);
+    recoverTmpFiles = vi.fn(async () => []);
+  }
+  return { ManifestStore: FakeManifestStore };
+});
+
+// temp-prompt：mock 掉真实 fs.promises I/O，消除 fake-timers 下的 flaky 竞态
+// （详见 run-spawn-integration.test.ts 同名 mock 的注释）。
+vi.mock("../temp-prompt.ts", () => ({
+  writePromptToTempFile: vi.fn(async (agent: string) => {
+    const safeName = agent.replace(/[^\w.-]+/g, "_");
+    return { dir: `/tmp/fake-${safeName}`, filePath: `/tmp/fake-${safeName}/prompt-${safeName}.md` };
+  }),
+  cleanupTempPrompt: vi.fn(async () => {}),
+}));
+
+import { spawn } from "node:child_process";
+
+import { waitForSpawn } from "./helpers/spawn-mock.ts";
+import { ModelConfigService } from "../model-config-service.ts";
+import type { ModelInfo, ModelRegistryLike } from "../model-resolver.ts";
+import { MAX_FORK_DEPTH } from "../session-context-resolver.ts";
+import { SubagentService } from "../subagent-service.ts";
+
+const mockSpawn = vi.mocked(spawn);
+
+/**
+ * spawn mock 返回的 fake child 类型。
+ * 由于 FakeChild 定义在 vi.mock 工厂内部（作用域隔离），此处用结构子集类型描述，
+ * 测试代码通过此类型访问 stdout/stderr/kill 等成员。
+ */
+interface FakeChild {
+  pid: number;
+  stdout: PassThrough;
+  stderr: PassThrough;
+  killed: boolean;
+  killSignal: string | undefined;
+  kill(sig?: string): boolean;
+  emit(event: string, ...args: unknown[]): boolean;
+}
+
+/** 从最近一次 spawn 调用取回返回的 FakeChild（测试控制器）。 */
+function lastSpawnedChild(): FakeChild {
+  const result = mockSpawn.mock.results.at(-1);
+  if (!result) throw new Error("spawn was not called yet");
+  return result.value as FakeChild;
+}
+
+// ============================================================
+// 辅助：FakeChild stdout 驱动（替代旧 fakeSession.subscribe 的事件注入）
+// ============================================================
+
+/** 构造 session header 行（stdout 首行，runSpawn 据此回填 record.sessionFile）。 */
+function sessionHeader(id = "nest-session"): Record<string, unknown> {
+  return {
+    type: "session",
+    id,
+    timestamp: "2026-07-03T12-00-00-000Z",
+    cwd: "/tmp/test",
+  };
+}
+
+/** 向 stdout 写一行 JSON（自动补换行，runSpawn 按 \n split 行）。 */
+function emitStdoutLine(child: FakeChild, obj: Record<string, unknown>): void {
+  child.stdout.write(`${JSON.stringify(obj)}\n`);
+}
+
+/**
+ * 驱动 FakeChild 完成 session：写 header + 可选事件 + close(0)。
+ *
+ * 这是「让 runSpawn 自然 resolve」的标准收尾路径。runSpawn 在 close 后判定 success
+ * （exitCode=0 → success=true），并跑 identity 补写 + finalizeRecord。
+ *
+ * @param events  header 之后、close 之前 emit 的 SdkEvent 行（tool/message/turn 等）
+ */
+async function driveChildToCompletion(child: FakeChild, events: Record<string, unknown>[] = []): Promise<void> {
+  emitStdoutLine(child, sessionHeader());
+  for (const e of events) emitStdoutLine(child, e);
+  child.stdout.end();
+  child.stderr.end();
+  child.emit("close", 0);
+}
+
+// ============================================================
+// 辅助：service 构造（与旧 setup 等价，但不再装配 fakeSdk）
+// ============================================================
+
+function makeEmptyRegistry(): ModelRegistryLike {
+  return { getAvailable: () => [], find: () => undefined, hasConfiguredAuth: () => true };
+}
+
+function makePi() {
+  return { sendMessage: vi.fn(), appendEntry: vi.fn(), events: { emit: vi.fn() } };
+}
+
+interface SetupResult {
+  service: SubagentService;
+}
+
+function setup(): SetupResult {
+  const agentDir = "/tmp/nest-it"; // fs 已 mock，路径不需真实存在
+  const modelService = new ModelConfigService({ agentDir });
+  modelService.initModel({
+    modelRegistry: makeEmptyRegistry(),
+    sessionId: "nest-it",
+    ctxModel: { id: "m", name: "M", provider: "p", reasoning: false },
+  });
+  const service = new SubagentService({
+    cwd: agentDir,
+    modelService,
+    getMainSessionFile: () => "/mock/main-session.jsonl",
+  });
+  service.initSession({ pi: makePi(), sessionId: "nest-it" });
+  return { service };
+}
+
+const ctxModel: ModelInfo = { id: "m", name: "M", provider: "p", reasoning: false };
+
+/** execCtxAls.run 的 duck-type（绕过 import AsyncLocalStorage，足够本组用例）。 */
+interface ExecCtxAls {
+  run: <T>(store: { recordId: string | undefined; depth: number }, cb: () => T) => T;
+}
+
+describe("嵌套护栏 / 并发池 / 节流（D-030~D-033 回归锁）", () => {
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vi.clearAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  // ============================================================
+  // D-032: background execute 进并发池（分层配额）
+  // ============================================================
+
+  it("[D-032] background execute 调 pool.acquire（进池限流）", async () => {
+    const { service } = setup();
+
+    const pool = Reflect.get(service, "pool") as { acquire: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>; release: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> };
+    const acquireSpy = vi.spyOn(pool, "acquire");
+
+    const execPromise = service.execute({ task: "bg in pool", ctxModel });
+    // detached runAndFinalize → acquire。等 spawn 拿到 child 再驱动完成。
+    await waitForSpawn(mockSpawn);
+    await driveChildToCompletion(lastSpawnedChild());
+
+    // 等 detached promise 链跑完（kickOffBackground 的 .then notify）
+    await new Promise<void>((r) => setTimeout(r, 10));
+
+    expect(acquireSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
+    // background execute 立即返回 handle（不等完成）
+    const handle = await execPromise;
+    expect(handle.mode).toBe("background");
+  });
+
+  // ============================================================
+  // D-033: 通用嵌套护栏（execute 入口，execCtxAls 非 fork 路径）
+  // ============================================================
+
+  it("[D-033] execCtxAls depth=MAX 时 execute 抛错（nestingDepth=MAX+1 被拒）", async () => {
+    const { service } = setup();
+
+    const execCtxAls = Reflect.get(service, "execCtxAls") as ExecCtxAls;
+
+    await expect(
+      execCtxAls.run({ recordId: "parent", depth: MAX_FORK_DEPTH }, () =>
+        service.execute({ task: "too deep", ctxModel }),
+      ),
+    ).rejects.toThrow(/nesting depth/);
+
+    // 无副作用：guard 在 createRecordForMode 之前，record 未创建
+    expect(service.collectRecords(10)).toHaveLength(0);
+    // guard 在 spawn 之前——不应 spawn 任何子进程
+    expect(mockSpawn).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("[D-033] execCtxAls depth=MAX-1 时 execute 不抛（nestingDepth=MAX 允许）", async () => {
+    const { service } = setup();
+
+    const execCtxAls = Reflect.get(service, "execCtxAls") as ExecCtxAls;
+
+    const execPromise = execCtxAls.run({ recordId: "parent", depth: MAX_FORK_DEPTH - 1 }, () =>
+      service.execute({ task: "at limit", ctxModel }),
+    );
+    await waitForSpawn(mockSpawn);
+    await driveChildToCompletion(lastSpawnedChild(), [
+      { type: "turn_end" },
+      { type: "message_end", message: { usage: { input: 1 } } },
+    ]);
+    const result = await execPromise;
+
+    expect(result.mode).toBe("background");
+  });
+
+  // ============================================================
+  // 原嵌套抑制 onUpdate / 节流清理 throttleState 用例组（:322-355）已删除——
+  // onEventThrottled 死路径删除（swf-perf-impl ledger #22 / cleanup-slice TC4/IF14，
+  // 详见 .cw/swf-perf-impl/cleanup-slice-design.json）。恢复点：本 slice 前的 git 历史。
+  // ============================================================
+});