@zhixuan92/multi-model-agent-core 4.7.9 → 4.7.11

package/dist/review/templates/annotator-shared.d.ts

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-export interface AnnotatorPromptContext {
-    /** N parallel sub-worker narratives, one per criterion the dispatcher
-     *  fanned out. The empty-result narrative ("No findings for this
-     *  criterion.") is filtered out by the engine before this context is
-     *  built — entries here are non-empty narratives that need merging. */
-    workerOutputs: Array<{
-        criterion: string;
-        narrative: string;
-    }>;
-    brief: string;
-}
-export interface AnnotatorTemplate {
-    role: string;
-    onBriefCheck: string;
-    /** Per-tool evidence rule. Tells the annotator what counts as
-     *  grounded evidence for findings from this tool. */
-    evidenceRule: string;
-    /** Per-tool scope rule. Tells the annotator what is in/out of scope
-     *  for findings from this tool. */
-    scopeRule: string;
-}
-export declare function buildAnnotatorRubric(template: AnnotatorTemplate): string;
-//# sourceMappingURL=annotator-shared.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/annotator-shared.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"annotator-shared.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/annotator-shared.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAGA,MAAM,WAAW,sBAAsB;IACrC;;;2EAGuE;IACvE,aAAa,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC;QAAE,SAAS,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;QAAC,SAAS,EAAE,MAAM,CAAA;KAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IAC/D,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;CACf;AAED,MAAM,WAAW,iBAAiB;IAChC,IAAI,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IACb,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IACrB;yDACqD;IACrD,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IACrB;uCACmC;IACnC,SAAS,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;CACnB;AAED,wBAAgB,oBAAoB,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,iBAAiB,GAAG,MAAM,CA+CxE"}

package/dist/review/templates/annotator-shared.js

@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-// Data shared by all 5 annotator templates. The actual prompt assembly
-// happens in review/annotator-prompt-builder.ts.
-export function buildAnnotatorRubric(template) {
-    return String.raw `
-## Output format (REQUIRED)
-
-Respond with exactly one fenced JSON code block AS THE LAST BLOCK in your
-response. The block contains a JSON array of finding objects, in the order
-the worker presented them. Example:
-
-` + '```json\n' + `[
-  {
-    "id": "F1",
-    "severity": "critical",
-    "claim": "Remote code execution via unsanitized input in src/handler.ts:42",
-    "evidence": "user input is passed directly into shellExec() without escaping",
-    "suggestion": "Use a parameterized API or escape input",
-    "annotatorConfidence": 90,
-    "category": "security"
-  }
-]
-` + '```' + `
-
-Field rules:
-- ` + '`id`' + `: assign sequentially F1, F2, F3, ... (must be unique).
-- ` + '`severity`' + `: one of "critical" | "high" | "medium" | "low" — YOUR
-   final judgment. The worker's value is a hint; calibrate to actual impact.
-- ` + '`claim`' + `: one-sentence summary.
-- ` + '`evidence`' + `: REQUIRED, ≥20 chars, MUST be a verbatim quote from the
-   worker's output.
-- ` + '`suggestion`' + `: optional; quote or paraphrase the worker's recommended fix.
-- ` + '`annotatorConfidence`' + `: integer 0-100. How confident YOU are
-   that the finding is correct, on-brief, and well-grounded.
-- ` + '`category`' + `: optional, one of: "missing_test" | "scope_creep" |
-   "incomplete_impl" | "style_lint" | "security" | "performance" |
-   "maintainability" | "doc_gap" | "doc_drift" | "contract_violation" |
-   "coverage_gap" | "dead_code" | "queue_hygiene" | "other".
-
-## Tool-specific evidence rule (apply when judging "well-grounded")
-
-` + template.evidenceRule + `
-
-## Tool-specific scope rule (apply when judging "on-brief")
-
-` + template.scopeRule + `
-
-If the worker raised NO issues, return ` + '`[]`' + `. Surrounding prose is
-allowed but ignored by the parser — only the LAST ` + '```json' + ` block is read.
-`.trim();
-}
-//# sourceMappingURL=annotator-shared.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/annotator-shared.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"annotator-shared.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/annotator-shared.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,uEAAuE;AACvE,iDAAiD;AAsBjD,MAAM,UAAU,oBAAoB,CAAC,QAA2B;IAC9D,OAAO,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAA;;;;;;;CAOlB,GAAG,WAAW,GAAG;;;;;;;;;;;CAWjB,GAAG,KAAK,GAAG;;;GAGT,GAAG,MAAM,GAAG;GACZ,GAAG,YAAY,GAAG;;GAElB,GAAG,SAAS,GAAG;GACf,GAAG,YAAY,GAAG;;GAElB,GAAG,cAAc,GAAG;GACpB,GAAG,uBAAuB,GAAG;;GAE7B,GAAG,YAAY,GAAG;;;;;;;CAOpB,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,YAAY,GAAG;;;;CAI3B,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,SAAS,GAAG;;wCAEe,GAAG,MAAM,GAAG;mDACD,GAAG,SAAS,GAAG;CACjE,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;AACT,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/finding-criteria.d.ts

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * Truly-shared finding criteria — the constants that apply *identically*
- * across every consumer. Per-tool blocks live next to each tool, not here.
- *
- *  - SEVERITY_LADDER: same severity ladder, same anti-inflation hint, same
- *    impact-anchored definitions for all 5 read-only tools.
- *  - REVIEWER_AWARENESS_AP: same spec+quality reviewer expectation across
- *    delegate / execute-plan / retry implementer prompts.
- *
- * Evidence + scope + annotator-awareness are calibrated per-tool; see
- * tools/<tool>/implementer-criteria.ts for each tool's blocks.
- */
-export declare const SEVERITY_LADDER: string;
-export declare const REVIEWER_AWARENESS_AP: string;
-//# sourceMappingURL=finding-criteria.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/finding-criteria.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"finding-criteria.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/finding-criteria.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;GAWG;AAEH,eAAO,MAAM,eAAe,QAOhB,CAAC;AAEb,eAAO,MAAM,qBAAqB,QAiBtB,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/finding-criteria.js

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * Truly-shared finding criteria — the constants that apply *identically*
- * across every consumer. Per-tool blocks live next to each tool, not here.
- *
- *  - SEVERITY_LADDER: same severity ladder, same anti-inflation hint, same
- *    impact-anchored definitions for all 5 read-only tools.
- *  - REVIEWER_AWARENESS_AP: same spec+quality reviewer expectation across
- *    delegate / execute-plan / retry implementer prompts.
- *
- * Evidence + scope + annotator-awareness are calibrated per-tool; see
- * tools/<tool>/implementer-criteria.ts for each tool's blocks.
- */
-export const SEVERITY_LADDER = [
-    'Severity (your judgment, calibrated to actual impact):',
-    '- critical: must fix first — RCE, data loss, auth bypass, build broken, data corruption.',
-    '- high:     real bug or security gap; blocks release.',
-    '- medium:   real issue; fix soon; not blocking.',
-    '- low:      minor or cosmetic issue; nice-to-fix.',
-    'Calibrate to actual impact, not how alarming the wording sounds. Workers commonly inflate — resist the urge.',
-].join('\n');
-export const REVIEWER_AWARENESS_AP = [
-    'After your edit, two reviewers see the cumulative diff (every change since task start):',
-    '',
-    '1. SPEC reviewer — "does the diff fulfill the brief?"',
-    '   - APPROVED requires: every brief item present in the diff, no missing pieces, no out-of-scope edits.',
-    '   - CHANGES_REQUIRED requires: a concrete concern tied to a specific diff line.',
-    '   - Empty diff = changes_required UNLESS the brief explicitly requested a no-op.',
-    '',
-    '2. QUALITY reviewer — "is the diff sound, safe, maintainable?"',
-    '   - Flags: correctness bugs, broken tests, races, security gaps, speculative dependencies.',
-    '   - Does NOT flag: stylistic preferences, comment bikeshedding, unrelated pre-existing code.',
-    '',
-    'Self-check before declaring done:',
-    '- Implemented EVERY item in the brief? (no gaps)',
-    '- No edits OUTSIDE the brief? (no scope creep)',
-    '- If your edit affects callers / tests not in your filePaths, note them in your summary — even if you can\'t update them.',
-    '- Are the changes minimal and verifiable, or could they be smaller?',
-].join('\n');
-//# sourceMappingURL=finding-criteria.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/finding-criteria.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"finding-criteria.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/finding-criteria.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;GAWG;AAEH,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,eAAe,GAAG;IAC7B,wDAAwD;IACxD,0FAA0F;IAC1F,uDAAuD;IACvD,iDAAiD;IACjD,mDAAmD;IACnD,8GAA8G;CAC/G,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC;AAEb,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,qBAAqB,GAAG;IACnC,yFAAyF;IACzF,EAAE;IACF,uDAAuD;IACvD,yGAAyG;IACzG,kFAAkF;IAClF,mFAAmF;IACnF,EAAE;IACF,gEAAgE;IAChE,6FAA6F;IAC7F,+FAA+F;IAC/F,EAAE;IACF,mCAAmC;IACnC,kDAAkD;IAClD,gDAAgD;IAChD,2HAA2H;IAC3H,qEAAqE;CACtE,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-audit.d.ts

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-import type { ReviewTemplate } from './shared.js';
-export declare const qualityAuditTemplate: ReviewTemplate;
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review-audit.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-audit.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review-audit.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review-audit.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAIlD,eAAO,MAAM,oBAAoB,EAAE,cAMlC,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-audit.js

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-import { buildAnnotatorRubric } from './annotator-shared.js';
-import { annotatorAuditTemplate } from './annotator-audit.js';
-export const qualityAuditTemplate = {
-    systemPrompt: `You are a quality reviewer checking an audit produced by a worker.
-For each finding, ask: is this the kind of issue the audit asked for? A security audit should produce security findings, not style nits.`,
-    buildUserPrompt(ctx) {
-        return `Task: ${ctx.brief}\n\nWorker output:\n${ctx.workerOutput}\n\n${buildAnnotatorRubric(annotatorAuditTemplate)}`;
-    },
-};
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review-audit.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-audit.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review-audit.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review-audit.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AACA,OAAO,EAAE,oBAAoB,EAAE,MAAM,uBAAuB,CAAC;AAC7D,OAAO,EAAE,sBAAsB,EAAE,MAAM,sBAAsB,CAAC;AAE9D,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,oBAAoB,GAAmB;IAClD,YAAY,EAAE;yIACyH;IACvI,eAAe,CAAC,GAAG;QACjB,OAAO,SAAS,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,uBAAuB,GAAG,CAAC,YAAY,OAAO,oBAAoB,CAAC,sBAAsB,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACxH,CAAC;CACF,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-debug.d.ts

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-import type { ReviewTemplate } from './shared.js';
-export declare const qualityDebugTemplate: ReviewTemplate;
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review-debug.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-debug.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review-debug.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review-debug.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAIlD,eAAO,MAAM,oBAAoB,EAAE,cAMlC,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-debug.js

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-import { buildAnnotatorRubric } from './annotator-shared.js';
-import { annotatorDebugTemplate } from './annotator-debug.js';
-export const qualityDebugTemplate = {
-    systemPrompt: `You are a quality reviewer checking a debugging hypothesis produced by a worker.
-Each finding should be a hypothesis, root-cause claim, or evidence (reproducer, error pattern, code path). Flag findings that do not logically follow from cited evidence or that exceed what the trace actually shows.`,
-    buildUserPrompt(ctx) {
-        return `Task: ${ctx.brief}\n\nWorker output:\n${ctx.workerOutput}\n\n${buildAnnotatorRubric(annotatorDebugTemplate)}`;
-    },
-};
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review-debug.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-debug.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review-debug.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review-debug.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AACA,OAAO,EAAE,oBAAoB,EAAE,MAAM,uBAAuB,CAAC;AAC7D,OAAO,EAAE,sBAAsB,EAAE,MAAM,sBAAsB,CAAC;AAE9D,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,oBAAoB,GAAmB;IAClD,YAAY,EAAE;wNACwM;IACtN,eAAe,CAAC,GAAG;QACjB,OAAO,SAAS,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,uBAAuB,GAAG,CAAC,YAAY,OAAO,oBAAoB,CAAC,sBAAsB,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACxH,CAAC;CACF,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-investigate.d.ts

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-import type { ReviewTemplate } from './shared.js';
-export declare const qualityInvestigateTemplate: ReviewTemplate;
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review-investigate.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-investigate.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review-investigate.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review-investigate.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAIlD,eAAO,MAAM,0BAA0B,EAAE,cAMxC,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-investigate.js

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-import { buildAnnotatorRubric } from './annotator-shared.js';
-import { annotatorInvestigateTemplate } from './annotator-investigate.js';
-export const qualityInvestigateTemplate = {
-    systemPrompt: `You are a quality reviewer checking a codebase investigation produced by a worker.
-Each finding should be relevant to the question. Findings may be code-level (file:line cited in evidence) or project-level synthesis (what was searched, what was not found). Flag findings whose evidence does not support the claim or whose claim drifts from the question.`,
-    buildUserPrompt(ctx) {
-        return `Task: ${ctx.brief}\n\nWorker output:\n${ctx.workerOutput}\n\n${buildAnnotatorRubric(annotatorInvestigateTemplate)}`;
-    },
-};
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review-investigate.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-investigate.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review-investigate.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review-investigate.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AACA,OAAO,EAAE,oBAAoB,EAAE,MAAM,uBAAuB,CAAC;AAC7D,OAAO,EAAE,4BAA4B,EAAE,MAAM,4BAA4B,CAAC;AAE1E,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,0BAA0B,GAAmB;IACxD,YAAY,EAAE;+QAC+P;IAC7Q,eAAe,CAAC,GAAG;QACjB,OAAO,SAAS,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,uBAAuB,GAAG,CAAC,YAAY,OAAO,oBAAoB,CAAC,4BAA4B,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IAC9H,CAAC;CACF,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-review.d.ts

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-import type { ReviewTemplate } from './shared.js';
-export declare const qualityReviewTemplate: ReviewTemplate;
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review-review.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-review.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review-review.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review-review.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAIlD,eAAO,MAAM,qBAAqB,EAAE,cAMnC,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-review.js

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-import { buildAnnotatorRubric } from './annotator-shared.js';
-import { annotatorReviewTemplate } from './annotator-review.js';
-export const qualityReviewTemplate = {
-    systemPrompt: `You are a quality reviewer checking a code review produced by a worker.
-For each finding, ask: is this within the requested focus area? A security review should produce security findings, not formatting nits.`,
-    buildUserPrompt(ctx) {
-        return `Task: ${ctx.brief}\n\nWorker output:\n${ctx.workerOutput}\n\n${buildAnnotatorRubric(annotatorReviewTemplate)}`;
-    },
-};
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review-review.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review-review.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review-review.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review-review.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AACA,OAAO,EAAE,oBAAoB,EAAE,MAAM,uBAAuB,CAAC;AAC7D,OAAO,EAAE,uBAAuB,EAAE,MAAM,uBAAuB,CAAC;AAEhE,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,qBAAqB,GAAmB;IACnD,YAAY,EAAE;yIACyH;IACvI,eAAe,CAAC,GAAG;QACjB,OAAO,SAAS,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,uBAAuB,GAAG,CAAC,YAAY,OAAO,oBAAoB,CAAC,uBAAuB,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACzH,CAAC;CACF,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review.d.ts

@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-import type { ReviewTemplate } from './shared.js';
-export declare const legalOutcomes: readonly ["found", "clean"];
-export declare const qualityLintTemplate: ReviewTemplate;
-export declare function qualityReviewPrompt(ctx: {
-    brief: string;
-    workerSummary: string;
-    filesChanged: string[];
-}): string;
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAElD,eAAO,MAAM,aAAa,6BAA8B,CAAC;AAiCzD,eAAO,MAAM,mBAAmB,EAAE,cA8CjC,CAAC;AAEF,wBAAgB,mBAAmB,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE;IAAE,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IAAC,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IAAC,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,CAAA;CAAE,GAAG,MAAM,CAUjH"}

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review.js

@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
-export const legalOutcomes = ['found', 'clean'];
-const OUTPUT_FORMAT = `Output format (mandatory):
-
-## Verdict
-approved | changes_required
-
-## Finding N: <one-line claim for this finding>
-- Severity: critical | high | medium | low
-- Category: <category name>
-- Evidence: <one concrete symptom or risk — quote source line or describe observable bad behaviour>
-- Suggestion: <specific, actionable fix — not a general nudge>
-
-## Finding N+1: ...
-(omit section entirely if approved)
-
-## Outcome
-found | clean
-
-Rules:
-- "approved" when the code is safe and correct enough to ship. Style nits do NOT block.
-- "changes_required" only for substantive risks (null-handling gap, missing error path, real edge case, security surface, etc.).
-- Each finding must be specific enough that a rework worker can act on it without re-deriving.
-- If approved, write "## Verdict\napproved" and omit the ## Finding sections entirely; then "## Outcome\nclean".
-- If changes_required, write "## Outcome\nfound".
-- Do NOT use editor tools. Read-only investigation only.
-
-**Severity definitions (per quality-review):**
-- **critical:** Will break in production
-- **high:** Correctness gap in normal use
-- **medium:** Maintainability/fragility
-- **low:** Style`;
-export const qualityLintTemplate = {
-    systemPrompt: [
-        'You are the QUALITY reviewer for a plan-execution task. You are LINT-ONLY — do NOT edit files.',
-        'Your scope: safety, correctness, error handling, edge cases, security, maintainability.',
-        'You are NOT checking plan fidelity — that is the spec reviewer\'s job (their report runs in parallel).',
-        'Read files as needed to verify. A separate REWORK stage will apply your findings.',
-        '',
-        OUTPUT_FORMAT,
-        '',
-        'Rules:',
-        '- "approved" when the code is safe and correct enough to ship. Style nits do NOT block.',
-        '- "changes_required" only for substantive risks (null-handling gap, missing error path, real edge case, security surface, etc.).',
-        '- Each finding must be specific enough that a rework worker can act on it without re-deriving.',
-        '- If approved, write "## Verdict\napproved" and omit the ## Finding sections entirely.',
-        '- Do NOT use editor tools. Read-only investigation only.',
-    ].join('\n'),
-    buildUserPrompt(ctx) {
-        const parts = [];
-        parts.push(`# Task brief\n${ctx.brief}`);
-        if (ctx.planContext && ctx.planContext.trim().length > 0) {
-            parts.push(`# Plan section (for context)\n\n\`\`\`markdown\n${ctx.planContext.trim()}\n\`\`\``);
-        }
-        if (ctx.diff && ctx.diff.length > 0) {
-            parts.push(`# Cumulative diff (current on-disk state)\n\n\`\`\`diff\n${ctx.diff}\n\`\`\``);
-        }
-        else {
-            parts.push('# Cumulative diff\n(no file changes detected)');
-        }
-        parts.push('# Action\nReview for safety/correctness/edge-cases. Emit the report. Do not edit.');
-        return parts.join('\n\n');
-    },
-    buildWarmFollowup(_ctx) {
-        // Warm follow-up: spec review already loaded the brief, diff, and
-        // planContext into this reviewer session's history on turn 1.
-        // Emit only the NEW instruction — switch lens to safety/correctness
-        // and emit the verdict + deviations report.
-        return [
-            '# Action — second pass: quality lens',
-            '',
-            'Now re-evaluate the SAME work in this thread through the QUALITY lens:',
-            'safety, correctness, error handling, edge cases, security, maintainability.',
-            '',
-            OUTPUT_FORMAT,
-        ].join('\n');
-    },
-};
-export function qualityReviewPrompt(ctx) {
-    return `You are the quality reviewer for this task.
-
-Brief: ${ctx.brief}
-
-Worker said: ${ctx.workerSummary}
-
-Files changed: ${ctx.filesChanged.join(', ') || '(none)'}
-
-${OUTPUT_FORMAT}`;
-}
-//# sourceMappingURL=quality-review.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/quality-review.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"quality-review.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/quality-review.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAEA,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,OAAO,CAAU,CAAC;AAEzD,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;iBA6BL,CAAC;AAElB,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,mBAAmB,GAAmB;IACjD,YAAY,EAAE;QACZ,gGAAgG;QAChG,yFAAyF;QACzF,wGAAwG;QACxG,mFAAmF;QACnF,EAAE;QACF,aAAa;QACb,EAAE;QACF,QAAQ;QACR,yFAAyF;QACzF,kIAAkI;QAClI,gGAAgG;QAChG,wFAAwF;QACxF,0DAA0D;KAC3D,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;IAEZ,eAAe,CAAC,GAAG;QACjB,MAAM,KAAK,GAAa,EAAE,CAAC;QAC3B,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,iBAAiB,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACzC,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,WAAW,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACzD,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,mDAAmD,GAAG,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC;QAClG,CAAC;QACD,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACpC,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,4DAA4D,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC;QAC7F,CAAC;aAAM,CAAC;YACN,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,+CAA+C,CAAC,CAAC;QAC9D,CAAC;QACD,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,mFAAmF,CAAC,CAAC;QAChG,OAAO,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC;IAC5B,CAAC;IAED,iBAAiB,CAAC,IAAI;QACpB,kEAAkE;QAClE,8DAA8D;QAC9D,oEAAoE;QACpE,4CAA4C;QAC5C,OAAO;YACL,sCAAsC;YACtC,EAAE;YACF,wEAAwE;YACxE,6EAA6E;YAC7E,EAAE;YACF,aAAa;SACd,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC;IACf,CAAC;CACF,CAAC;AAEF,MAAM,UAAU,mBAAmB,CAAC,GAAqE;IACvG,OAAO;;SAEA,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK;;eAEH,GAAG,CAAC,aAAa;;iBAEf,GAAG,CAAC,YAAY,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,QAAQ;;EAEtD,aAAa,EAAE,CAAC;AAClB,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/rework.d.ts

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-import type { ReviewTemplate } from './shared.js';
-export declare const reworkTemplate: ReviewTemplate;
-//# sourceMappingURL=rework.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/rework.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"rework.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/rework.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAElD,eAAO,MAAM,cAAc,EAAE,cAkD5B,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/rework.js

@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-export const reworkTemplate = {
-    systemPrompt: [
-        'You are the REWORK worker. The implementer ran, then two reviewers (spec + quality) lint-checked the result and produced deviations.',
-        'Your job: fix every deviation. You have FULL editor tools.',
-        '',
-        'CRITICAL: this is a SINGLE-PASS pipeline. There is NO second rework round. After you, the annotator scores completeness and the commit gate fires. If you skip a fix, no commit lands.',
-        '',
-        'Per-deviation procedure:',
-        '  1. Read the relevant file ONCE (skip if already read this turn).',
-        '  2. Apply the fix with one edit call.',
-        '  3. Move on. Do not re-read; do not re-evaluate.',
-        '',
-        'Hard rules:',
-        '- Trust the reviewers — do not re-investigate whether the deviation is valid.',
-        '- If a deviation is truly impossible to fix (conflicting constraints, missing source), write "could not fix: <deviation> — reason" in your summary and move on.',
-        '- Read each file AT MOST ONCE in this stage.',
-        '',
-        'When done: write summary "Fixed: <list of deviations>. Could not fix: <list with reasons>." End your turn.',
-        '',
-        'workerStatus calibration (this is where rework workers commonly under-rate themselves):',
-        '- "done"             — you applied a fix for EVERY listed deviation. This is the correct value even though the reviewer originally flagged concerns. Being asked to rework is not, by itself, a "concern" — addressing the rework IS the success path. Verification of the fix is the reviewer\'s responsibility on the next round — do not mark yourself failed because you couldn\'t independently verify.',
-        '- "done_with_concerns" — you addressed every listed deviation AND noticed a NEW unrelated issue you couldn\'t fix in this turn. Put the new issue in `unresolved`.',
-        '- "blocked" / "failed"  — you were unable to apply a fix for ONE OR MORE of the listed deviations (conflicting constraints, missing source, ambiguous instruction). Put those entries in the "Could not fix" line AND in `unresolved`.',
-        'If your summary line is "Fixed: <every deviation>. Could not fix: (none)." then workerStatus MUST be "done".',
-    ].join('\n'),
-    buildUserPrompt(ctx) {
-        // Warm follow-up: this rework turn always resumes the implementer's
-        // thread. The brief, prior worker output, and current cumulative diff
-        // are already in the resumed session's conversation history. Emit
-        // only the NEW content — the reviewer's deviations to fix.
-        const parts = [];
-        if (ctx.priorConcerns && ctx.priorConcerns.length > 0) {
-            parts.push(`# Reviewer deviations to fix\n${ctx.priorConcerns
-                .map((c, i) => `${i + 1}. ${c}`)
-                .join('\n')}`);
-        }
-        else {
-            parts.push('# Reviewer deviations to fix\n(none — should not have reached this stage; end immediately)');
-        }
-        parts.push('# Action\n' +
-            '1. Fix each deviation in order.\n' +
-            '2. Apply one edit call per file. Do not re-read after editing.\n' +
-            '3. Write your summary and end your turn.\n' +
-            '4. In your final WorkerOutput JSON: set workerStatus to "done" if your "Could not fix" line is empty (every listed deviation was addressed). Reserve "failed" / "blocked" for deviations you could not address — having had concerns to begin with is not, in itself, a concern.');
-        return parts.join('\n\n');
-    },
-};
-//# sourceMappingURL=rework.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/rework.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"rework.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/rework.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAEA,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,cAAc,GAAmB;IAC5C,YAAY,EAAE;QACZ,sIAAsI;QACtI,4DAA4D;QAC5D,EAAE;QACF,wLAAwL;QACxL,EAAE;QACF,0BAA0B;QAC1B,oEAAoE;QACpE,wCAAwC;QACxC,mDAAmD;QACnD,EAAE;QACF,aAAa;QACb,+EAA+E;QAC/E,iKAAiK;QACjK,8CAA8C;QAC9C,EAAE;QACF,4GAA4G;QAC5G,EAAE;QACF,yFAAyF;QACzF,8YAA8Y;QAC9Y,oKAAoK;QACpK,wOAAwO;QACxO,8GAA8G;KAC/G,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;IAEZ,eAAe,CAAC,GAAG;QACjB,oEAAoE;QACpE,sEAAsE;QACtE,kEAAkE;QAClE,2DAA2D;QAC3D,MAAM,KAAK,GAAa,EAAE,CAAC;QAC3B,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,aAAa,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,aAAa,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACtD,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CACR,iCAAiC,GAAG,CAAC,aAAa;iBAC/C,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;iBAC/B,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CAChB,CAAC;QACJ,CAAC;aAAM,CAAC;YACN,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,4FAA4F,CAAC,CAAC;QAC3G,CAAC;QACD,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CACR,YAAY;YACZ,mCAAmC;YACnC,kEAAkE;YAClE,4CAA4C;YAC5C,kRAAkR,CACnR,CAAC;QACF,OAAO,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC;IAC5B,CAAC;CACF,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/shared.d.ts

@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-export interface ReviewTemplateContext {
-    workerOutput: string;
-    brief: string;
-    filesChanged?: string[];
-    /**
-     * Cumulative unified diff of every change made since task start,
-     * across all rework rounds. Empty/undefined when no changes were
-     * detected (or the route is read-only).
-     *
-     * Tool sweep #6: reviewer templates were operating blind on the
-     * worker's text claim alone. Passing the diff lets each reviewer
-     * be precise — verdicts are grounded in code evidence, not prose.
-     */
-    diff?: string;
-    /**
-     * Concrete concerns from previous reviewer rounds in this chain.
-     * Round 1 sees an empty list; round 2+ sees what round 1 flagged
-     * so it can verify "did the rework address X" rather than re-deriving.
-     */
-    priorConcerns?: string[];
-    /**
-     * For execute-plan tasks: the verbatim plan section the worker was
-     * asked to execute, separate from `brief` (which contains the worker's
-     * full prompt with orientation, fidelity rules, etc.). When set, the
-     * spec reviewer compares the diff against this section's verbatim code
-     * blocks character-for-character — semantically-equivalent rewrites
-     * are CODE SUBSTITUTION, not approval. Unset for non-execute-plan
-     * routes (delegate, audit, review, verify, debug, investigate).
-     */
-    planContext?: string;
-    /** Spec lint-reviewer raw report. */
-    specReviewerNotes?: string | null;
-    /** Quality lint-reviewer raw report. */
-    qualityReviewerNotes?: string | null;
-    /** Spec lint-reviewer transport/return error. */
-    specReviewError?: string | null;
-    /** Quality lint-reviewer transport/return error. */
-    qualityReviewError?: string | null;
-    /** True if rework stage ran and applied edits. */
-    reworkApplied?: boolean | null;
-    /** Rework worker's free-text summary. */
-    reworkOutput?: string | null;
-    /** Rework transport/return error. */
-    reworkError?: string | null;
-    /** Deterministic verify command result (Stage 4 pre-step). */
-    verifyResult?: {
-        ran: boolean;
-        passed: boolean | null;
-        exitCode: number | null;
-        command: string[];
-        tailOutput: string | null;
-    } | null;
-}
-export interface ReviewTemplate {
-    systemPrompt: string;
-    buildUserPrompt(ctx: ReviewTemplateContext): string;
-    /**
-     * Optional warm-followup variant — used by `review-handler.ts` for
-     * the second iteration of the same reviewer session (turn 2 hits
-     * cached history; we skip re-inlining `brief`, `workerOutput`, `diff`,
-     * `planContext`). Templates that never run a second turn don't define
-     * this method. See
-     * `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-12-warm-followup-context-contract-design.md`.
-     */
-    buildWarmFollowup?(ctx: ReviewTemplateContext): string;
-}
-//# sourceMappingURL=shared.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/shared.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"shared.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/shared.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,MAAM,WAAW,qBAAqB;IACpC,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IACrB,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IACd,YAAY,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC;IACxB;;;;;;;;OAQG;IACH,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IACd;;;;OAIG;IACH,aAAa,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC;IACzB;;;;;;;;OAQG;IACH,WAAW,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IAGrB,qCAAqC;IACrC,iBAAiB,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;IAClC,wCAAwC;IACxC,oBAAoB,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;IACrC,iDAAiD;IACjD,eAAe,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;IAChC,oDAAoD;IACpD,kBAAkB,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;IACnC,kDAAkD;IAClD,aAAa,CAAC,EAAE,OAAO,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;IAC/B,yCAAyC;IACzC,YAAY,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;IAC7B,qCAAqC;IACrC,WAAW,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;IAC5B,8DAA8D;IAC9D,YAAY,CAAC,EAAE;QACb,GAAG,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC;QACb,MAAM,EAAE,OAAO,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;QACvB,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;QACxB,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC;QAClB,UAAU,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;KAC3B,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC;CACV;AAED,MAAM,WAAW,cAAc;IAC7B,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IACrB,eAAe,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,qBAAqB,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC;IACpD;;;;;;;OAOG;IACH,iBAAiB,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,qBAAqB,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC;CACxD"}

package/dist/review/templates/shared.js

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-export {};
-//# sourceMappingURL=shared.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/shared.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"shared.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/shared.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":""}

package/dist/review/templates/spec-review.d.ts

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-import type { ReviewTemplate } from './shared.js';
-export declare const legalOutcomes: readonly ["found", "clean"];
-export declare const OUTPUT_FORMAT: string;
-export declare function specReviewPrompt(ctx: {
-    brief: string;
-    workerSummary: string;
-    filesChanged: string[];
-}): string;
-export declare const specLintTemplate: ReviewTemplate;
-//# sourceMappingURL=spec-review.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/templates/spec-review.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"spec-review.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/spec-review.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAElD,eAAO,MAAM,aAAa,6BAA8B,CAAC;AAEzD,eAAO,MAAM,aAAa,QA0BlB,CAAC;AAET,wBAAgB,gBAAgB,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE;IAAE,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IAAC,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IAAC,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,CAAA;CAAE,GAAG,MAAM,CAU9G;AAED,eAAO,MAAM,gBAAgB,EAAE,cAkC9B,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/templates/spec-review.js

@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
-export const legalOutcomes = ['found', 'clean'];
-export const OUTPUT_FORMAT = `
-## Verdict
-approved | changes_required
-
-## Findings
-Emit zero or more findings using EXACTLY this block format. Each finding is its own block.
-
-## Finding N: <one-line claim>
-- Severity: critical | high | medium | low
-- Category: <one word — e.g. missing-step, wrong-file, broken-contract>
-- Evidence: <verbatim excerpt from source, ≥20 chars — or (none) if inferable>
-- Suggestion: <one sentence — how to fix it>
-
-## Finding N+1:
-...
-
-If no findings, write "## Findings\n(none)".
-
-## Outcome
-found | clean
-
-**Severity definitions (per spec-review):**
-- **critical:** Plan step missed/wrong such that feature won't work
-- **high:** Plan step partially implemented
-- **medium:** Diverges in non-essential ways
-- **low:** Cosmetic drift
-`.trim();
-export function specReviewPrompt(ctx) {
-    return `You are the spec reviewer for this task.
-
-Brief: ${ctx.brief}
-
-Worker said: ${ctx.workerSummary}
-
-Files changed: ${ctx.filesChanged.join(', ') || '(none)'}
-
-${OUTPUT_FORMAT}`;
-}
-export const specLintTemplate = {
-    systemPrompt: [
-        'You are the SPEC reviewer for a plan-execution task. You are LINT-ONLY — do NOT edit files.',
-        'Your sole job: compare the on-disk state against the plan and emit a structured report.',
-        'Read files as needed to verify. A separate REWORK stage will apply your findings.',
-        '',
-        'Output format (mandatory):',
-        '',
-        OUTPUT_FORMAT,
-        '',
-        'Rules:',
-        '- "approved" means the diff fully implements the plan section. Trivial wording differences are OK.',
-        '- "changes_required" when any plan step is missing, partial, or wrong on disk.',
-        '- Each finding must be specific enough that a rework worker can act on it without re-deriving.',
-        '- If no findings, write "## Findings\\n(none)" followed by "## Outcome\\nclean".',
-        '- If any findings, write "## Outcome\\nfound".',
-        '- Do NOT use editor tools. Read-only investigation only. Editing is the rework stage\'s job.',
-    ].join('\n'),
-    buildUserPrompt(ctx) {
-        const parts = [];
-        parts.push(`# Task brief\n${ctx.brief}`);
-        if (ctx.planContext && ctx.planContext.trim().length > 0) {
-            parts.push(`# Plan section (the contract to compare against)\n\n\`\`\`markdown\n${ctx.planContext.trim()}\n\`\`\``);
-        }
-        parts.push(`# Worker's summary\n${ctx.workerOutput || '(no summary)'}`);
-        if (ctx.diff && ctx.diff.length > 0) {
-            parts.push(`# Cumulative diff (current on-disk state)\n\n\`\`\`diff\n${ctx.diff}\n\`\`\``);
-        }
-        else {
-            parts.push('# Cumulative diff\n(no file changes detected)');
-        }
-        parts.push('# Action\nCompare diff vs plan. Emit the report. Do not edit.');
-        return parts.join('\n\n');
-    },
-};
-//# sourceMappingURL=spec-review.js.map

package/dist/review/templates/spec-review.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"spec-review.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/review/templates/spec-review.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAEA,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,OAAO,CAAU,CAAC;AAEzD,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CA0B5B,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;AAET,MAAM,UAAU,gBAAgB,CAAC,GAAqE;IACpG,OAAO;;SAEA,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK;;eAEH,GAAG,CAAC,aAAa;;iBAEf,GAAG,CAAC,YAAY,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,QAAQ;;EAEtD,aAAa,EAAE,CAAC;AAClB,CAAC;AAED,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,gBAAgB,GAAmB;IAC9C,YAAY,EAAE;QACZ,6FAA6F;QAC7F,yFAAyF;QACzF,mFAAmF;QACnF,EAAE;QACF,4BAA4B;QAC5B,EAAE;QACF,aAAa;QACb,EAAE;QACF,QAAQ;QACR,oGAAoG;QACpG,gFAAgF;QAChF,gGAAgG;QAChG,kFAAkF;QAClF,gDAAgD;QAChD,8FAA8F;KAC/F,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;IAEZ,eAAe,CAAC,GAAG;QACjB,MAAM,KAAK,GAAa,EAAE,CAAC;QAC3B,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,iBAAiB,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACzC,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,WAAW,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACzD,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,uEAAuE,GAAG,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC;QACtH,CAAC;QACD,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,uBAAuB,GAAG,CAAC,YAAY,IAAI,cAAc,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACxE,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACpC,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,4DAA4D,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC;QAC7F,CAAC;aAAM,CAAC;YACN,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,+CAA+C,CAAC,CAAC;QAC9D,CAAC;QACD,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,+DAA+D,CAAC,CAAC;QAC5E,OAAO,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC;IAC5B,CAAC;CACF,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/tier-policy.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"tier-policy.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/review/tier-policy.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,SAAS,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAE7C;;;;;;;GAOG;AACH,wBAAgB,oBAAoB,CAAC,eAAe,EAAE,SAAS,GAAG,SAAS,CAE1E"}

package/dist/review/tier-policy.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"tier-policy.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/review/tier-policy.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAEA;;;;;;;GAOG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,oBAAoB,CAAC,eAA0B;IAC7D,OAAO,eAAe,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC;AAChE,CAAC"}

package/dist/stores/context-block-project-cap.d.ts

@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * Per-project recency signal — the value used to decide LRU ordering.
- * For non-empty dirs: max(mtime of any file). For empty dirs: dir mtime.
- *
- * This helper is exported so the storage migration (A1.7) can use the
- * same calculation. Without sharing, the two code paths can drift and
- * different "recent" projects survive a sweep vs a migration.
- */
-export declare function computeProjectRecencyMs(projectDir: string): number;
-export declare function sweepProjectCap(contextBlocksRoot: string, maxProjects: number, protectedHashes?: ReadonlySet<string>): {
-    kept: number;
-    evicted: number;
-};
-//# sourceMappingURL=context-block-project-cap.d.ts.map