@zhixuan92/multi-model-agent-core 4.5.0 → 4.5.2

package/dist/review/annotator-prompt-builder.js

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-import { buildAnnotatorRubric } from './templates/annotator-shared.js';
-export class AnnotatorPromptBuilder {
-    templates;
-    constructor(templates) {
-        this.templates = templates;
-    }
-    build(route, ctx) {
-        return assembleAnnotatorPrompt(this.templates[route], ctx);
-    }
-}
-/**
- * Trim the implementer brief down to the "what was asked" essentials
- * before sending to the annotator. The annotator does NOT need the
- * finding-format spec (it has its own format spec via buildAnnotatorRubric)
- * or the delta-mode instructions. Sending the full brief wastes
- * 1-3KB context per call and mildly distracts the model.
- *
- * Two prompt shapes covered:
- *
- *   1. **Goal-first** (audit / review / verify / debug):
- *      `<goal + scope>\n\n<format spec at the END>` — slice off the
- *      format spec, keep everything before it.
- *
- *   2. **Spec-first** (investigate): the brief opens with the
- *      structured-format instructions and ends with `Question: <text>`.
- *      Pull the question line out as the compact brief.
- *
- * If neither shape applies, the brief is returned unchanged.
- */
-export function trimBriefForAnnotator(brief) {
-    if (typeof brief !== 'string' || brief.length === 0)
-        return brief;
-    // Shape 2 (investigate): pull the `Question: ...` line out.
-    const questionMatch = brief.match(/^\s*Question:\s+(.+)$/m);
-    if (questionMatch) {
-        return `Question: ${questionMatch[1].trim()}`;
-    }
-    // Shape 1 (audit / review / verify / debug): slice before the first
-    // format-spec marker. Each per-tool implementer prompt structures
-    // the goal at the top, format spec at the bottom — so this gives
-    // the annotator the goal + scope without the duplicated format
-    // instructions.
-    const markers = [
-        /\nProduce a narrative .* report\./i,
-        /\nFor each checklist item, use this EXACT/i,
-        /\nUse hypothesis-driven debugging\./i,
-        /\n## Finding 1:/i,
-        /\nUse this EXACT per-finding format/i,
-    ];
-    let cut = brief.length;
-    for (const m of markers) {
-        const idx = brief.search(m);
-        if (idx >= 0 && idx < cut)
-            cut = idx;
-    }
-    return brief.slice(0, cut).trim();
-}
-export function assembleAnnotatorPrompt(template, ctx) {
-    // Tool sweep #11: trim the brief — the format-spec section is
-    // duplicated by buildAnnotatorRubric below, so sending it again is
-    // redundant + costly.
-    const compactBrief = trimBriefForAnnotator(ctx.brief);
-    // Multi-narrative merge mode: each sub-worker covered ONE criterion.
-    // The annotator dedups overlapping findings and recalibrates severity
-    // against the shared SEVERITY_LADDER. Single-narrative inputs (e.g.
-    // a route that hasn't migrated to fan-out) take the same path with N=1.
-    const sections = ctx.workerOutputs.map(o => `--- Sub-worker for ${o.criterion} ---\n${o.narrative}`).join('\n\n');
-    const mergeInstructions = ctx.workerOutputs.length > 1
-        ? `\n## Merge instructions (text-only — do NOT read files; you have no tools)\n\nThe worker output below is N narratives, each from a sub-worker that covered ONE criterion. Merge them into a single findings list using ONLY the text below — no file reads, no greps. Your job:\n1. Combine findings across narratives into one list.\n2. Dedup by (file, line, claim essence) using TEXTUAL comparison — if two findings name the same file:line and describe the same issue in different words, KEEP ONE (higher severity wins; merge any non-redundant evidence quoted in their text).\n3. Recalibrate severity using the shared severity ladder so a sub-worker that inflated within its narrow scope is rebucketed against the global picture.\n4. Drop narratives that contained no findings (valid empty results, not parse failures).\n5. **DROP findings whose title starts with "[N/A]"** — completeness signals from sub-workers reporting "this perspective does not apply." MUST NOT appear in the final array.\n6. Do NOT speculate, expand, re-investigate, or "verify" findings against the source — your input is the narratives only. If you can't dedup confidently from the text, keep both findings and let the reader decide.\n\n`
-        : '';
-    return `You are reviewing a ${template.role} produced by a worker.
-
-The user requested a ${template.role}. The brief was:
-
-${compactBrief}
-
-## On-brief check (per finding)
-
-${template.onBriefCheck}
-${mergeInstructions}
-## Worker output to extract findings from
-
-${sections}
-
-${buildAnnotatorRubric(template)}`;
-}
-//# sourceMappingURL=annotator-prompt-builder.js.map

package/dist/review/annotator-prompt-builder.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"annotator-prompt-builder.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/review/annotator-prompt-builder.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,EAAE,oBAAoB,EAAuD,MAAM,iCAAiC,CAAC;AAI5H,MAAM,OAAO,sBAAsB;IAEvB;IADV,YACU,SAAoD;QAApD,cAAS,GAAT,SAAS,CAA2C;IAC3D,CAAC;IAEJ,KAAK,CAAC,KAAqB,EAAE,GAA2B;QACtD,OAAO,uBAAuB,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;IAC7D,CAAC;CACF;AAED;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAkBG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,qBAAqB,CAAC,KAAa;IACjD,IAAI,OAAO,KAAK,KAAK,QAAQ,IAAI,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC;QAAE,OAAO,KAAK,CAAC;IAElE,4DAA4D;IAC5D,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,wBAAwB,CAAC,CAAC;IAC5D,IAAI,aAAa,EAAE,CAAC;QAClB,OAAO,aAAa,aAAa,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC;IAChD,CAAC;IAED,oEAAoE;IACpE,kEAAkE;IAClE,iEAAiE;IACjE,+DAA+D;IAC/D,gBAAgB;IAChB,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG;QACd,oCAAoC;QACpC,4CAA4C;QAC5C,sCAAsC;QACtC,kBAAkB;QAClB,sCAAsC;KACvC,CAAC;IACF,IAAI,GAAG,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;IACvB,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;QACxB,MAAM,GAAG,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QAC5B,IAAI,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,GAAG,GAAG,GAAG;YAAE,GAAG,GAAG,GAAG,CAAC;IACvC,CAAC;IACD,OAAO,KAAK,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;AACpC,CAAC;AAED,MAAM,UAAU,uBAAuB,CAAC,QAA2B,EAAE,GAA2B;IAC9F,8DAA8D;IAC9D,mEAAmE;IACnE,sBAAsB;IACtB,MAAM,YAAY,GAAG,qBAAqB,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC;IAEtD,qEAAqE;IACrE,sEAAsE;IACtE,oEAAoE;IACpE,wEAAwE;IACxE,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,GAAG,CAAC,aAAa,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CACzC,sBAAsB,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,CACxD,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC;IAEf,MAAM,iBAAiB,GAAG,GAAG,CAAC,aAAa,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC;QACpD,CAAC,CAAC,yrCAAyrC;QAC3rC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IAEP,OAAO,uBAAuB,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI;;uBAEtB,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI;;EAElC,YAAY;;;;EAIZ,QAAQ,CAAC,YAAY;EACrB,iBAAiB;;;EAGjB,QAAQ;;EAER,oBAAoB,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;AACnC,CAAC"}

package/dist/review/review-verdict-aggregator.d.ts

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-import type { ReviewVerdict } from '../types.js';
-export interface ReviewSlot {
-    verdict: ReviewVerdict;
-    concerns?: string[];
-}
-export interface AggregatedReviews {
-    finalVerdict: ReviewVerdict;
-    allConcerns: string[];
-}
-/**
- * Aggregate verdicts across multiple review slots (spec/quality/diff).
- * The final verdict is the most-severe across slots; concerns are unioned.
- *
- * Severity order: error > changes_required > concerns > annotated > approved > not_applicable/skipped.
- */
-export declare function aggregateReviews(slots: ReviewSlot[]): AggregatedReviews;
-//# sourceMappingURL=review-verdict-aggregator.d.ts.map

package/dist/review/review-verdict-aggregator.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"review-verdict-aggregator.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/review/review-verdict-aggregator.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAEjD,MAAM,WAAW,UAAU;IACzB,OAAO,EAAE,aAAa,CAAC;IACvB,QAAQ,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC;CACrB;AAED,MAAM,WAAW,iBAAiB;IAChC,YAAY,EAAE,aAAa,CAAC;IAC5B,WAAW,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC;CACvB;AAYD;;;;;GAKG;AACH,wBAAgB,gBAAgB,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,UAAU,EAAE,GAAG,iBAAiB,CAYvE"}

package/dist/review/review-verdict-aggregator.js

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-const VERDICT_PRIORITY = {
-    error: 5,
-    changes_required: 4,
-    concerns: 3,
-    annotated: 2,
-    approved: 1,
-    not_applicable: 0,
-    skipped: 0,
-};
-/**
- * Aggregate verdicts across multiple review slots (spec/quality/diff).
- * The final verdict is the most-severe across slots; concerns are unioned.
- *
- * Severity order: error > changes_required > concerns > annotated > approved > not_applicable/skipped.
- */
-export function aggregateReviews(slots) {
-    let finalVerdict = 'not_applicable';
-    const allConcerns = [];
-    for (const slot of slots) {
-        if ((VERDICT_PRIORITY[slot.verdict] ?? 0) > (VERDICT_PRIORITY[finalVerdict] ?? 0)) {
-            finalVerdict = slot.verdict;
-        }
-        if (slot.concerns) {
-            for (const c of slot.concerns)
-                allConcerns.push(c);
-        }
-    }
-    return { finalVerdict, allConcerns };
-}
-//# sourceMappingURL=review-verdict-aggregator.js.map

package/dist/review/review-verdict-aggregator.js.map

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"review-verdict-aggregator.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/review/review-verdict-aggregator.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAYA,MAAM,gBAAgB,GAAkC;IACtD,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC;IACR,gBAAgB,EAAE,CAAC;IACnB,QAAQ,EAAE,CAAC;IACX,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;IACZ,QAAQ,EAAE,CAAC;IACX,cAAc,EAAE,CAAC;IACjB,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;CACX,CAAC;AAEF;;;;;GAKG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,gBAAgB,CAAC,KAAmB;IAClD,IAAI,YAAY,GAAkB,gBAAgB,CAAC;IACnD,MAAM,WAAW,GAAa,EAAE,CAAC;IACjC,KAAK,MAAM,IAAI,IAAI,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC;QACzB,IAAI,CAAC,gBAAgB,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,gBAAgB,CAAC,YAAY,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YAClF,YAAY,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC;QAC9B,CAAC;QACD,IAAI,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,CAAC;YAClB,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ;gBAAE,WAAW,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QACrD,CAAC;IACH,CAAC;IACD,OAAO,EAAE,YAAY,EAAE,WAAW,EAAE,CAAC;AACvC,CAAC"}