@zeyue0329/xiaoma-cli 1.12.0 → 1.15.0

package/src/xmc-skills/4-implementation/xiaoma-quick-dev/step-04-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+---
+deferred_work_file: '{implementation_artifacts}/deferred-work.md'
+specLoopIteration: 1
+---
+
+# Step 4: Review
+
+## RULES
+
+- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+- Review subagents get NO conversation context.
+- All review subagents must run at the same model capability as the current session.
+
+## INSTRUCTIONS
+
+Change `{spec_file}` status to `in-review` in the frontmatter before continuing.
+
+### Construct Diff
+
+Read `{baseline_commit}` from `{spec_file}` frontmatter. If `{baseline_commit}` is missing or `NO_VCS`, use best effort to determine what changed. Otherwise, construct `{diff_output}` covering all changes — tracked and untracked — since `{baseline_commit}`.
+
+Do NOT `git add` anything — this is read-only inspection.
+
+### Review
+
+Launch three subagents without conversation context. If no sub-agents are available, generate three review prompt files in `{implementation_artifacts}` — one per reviewer role below — and HALT. Ask the human to run each in a separate session (ideally a different LLM) and paste back the findings.
+
+- **Blind hunter** — receives `{diff_output}` only. No spec, no context docs, no project access. Invoke via the `xiaoma-review-adversarial-general` skill.
+- **Edge case hunter** — receives `{diff_output}` and read access to the project. Invoke via the `xiaoma-review-edge-case-hunter` skill.
+- **Acceptance auditor** — receives `{diff_output}`, `{spec_file}`, and read access to the project. Must also read the docs listed in `{spec_file}` frontmatter `context`. Checks for violations of acceptance criteria, rules, and principles from the spec and context docs.
+
+### Classify
+
+1. Deduplicate all review findings.
+2. Classify each finding. The first three categories are **this story's problem** — caused or exposed by the current change. The last two are **not this story's problem**.
+   - **intent_gap** — caused by the change; cannot be resolved from the spec because the captured intent is incomplete. Do not infer intent unless there is exactly one possible reading.
+   - **bad_spec** — caused by the change, including direct deviations from spec. The spec should have been clear enough to prevent it. When in doubt between bad_spec and patch, prefer bad_spec — a spec-level fix is more likely to produce coherent code.
+   - **patch** — caused by the change; trivially fixable without human input. Just part of the diff.
+   - **defer** — pre-existing issue not caused by this story, surfaced incidentally by the review. Collect for later focused attention.
+   - **reject** — noise. Drop silently. When unsure between defer and reject, prefer reject — only defer findings you are confident are real.
+3. Process findings in cascading order. If intent_gap or bad_spec findings exist, they trigger a loopback — lower findings are moot since code will be re-derived. If neither exists, process patch and defer normally. Increment `{specLoopIteration}` on each loopback. If it exceeds 5, HALT and escalate to the human.
+   - **intent_gap** — Root cause is inside `<frozen-after-approval>`. Revert code changes. Loop back to the human to resolve. Once resolved, read fully and follow `./step-02-plan.md` to re-run steps 2–4.
+   - **bad_spec** — Root cause is outside `<frozen-after-approval>`. Before reverting code: extract KEEP instructions for positive preservation (what worked well and must survive re-derivation). Revert code changes. Read the `## Spec Change Log` in `{spec_file}` and strictly respect all logged constraints when amending the non-frozen sections that contain the root cause. Append a new change-log entry recording: the triggering finding, what was amended, the known-bad state avoided, and the KEEP instructions. Read fully and follow `./step-03-implement.md` to re-derive the code, then this step will run again.
+   - **patch** — Auto-fix. These are the only findings that survive loopbacks.
+   - **defer** — Append to `{deferred_work_file}`.
+   - **reject** — Drop silently.
+
+## NEXT
+
+Read fully and follow `./step-05-present.md`

package/src/xmc-skills/4-implementation/xiaoma-quick-dev/step-05-present.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+---
+---
+
+# Step 5: Present
+
+## RULES
+
+- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+- NEVER auto-push.
+
+## INSTRUCTIONS
+
+### Generate Suggested Review Order
+
+Read `{baseline_commit}` from `{spec_file}` frontmatter and construct the diff of all changes since that commit.
+
+Append the review order as a `## Suggested Review Order` section to `{spec_file}` **after the last existing section**. Do not modify the Code Map.
+
+Build the trail as an ordered sequence of **stops** — clickable `path:line` references with brief framing — optimized for a human reviewer reading top-down to understand the change:
+
+1. **Order by concern, not by file.** Group stops by the conceptual concern they address (e.g., "validation logic", "schema change", "UI binding"). A single file may appear under multiple concerns.
+2. **Lead with the entry point** — the single highest-leverage file:line a reviewer should look at first to grasp the design intent.
+3. **Inside each concern**, order stops from most important / architecturally interesting to supporting. Lightly bias toward higher-risk or boundary-crossing stops.
+4. **End with peripherals** — tests, config, types, and other supporting changes come last.
+5. **Every code reference is a clickable spec-file-relative link.** Compute each link target as a relative path from `{spec_file}`'s directory to the changed file. Format each stop as a markdown link: `[short-name:line](../../path/to/file.ts#L42)`. Use a `#L` line anchor. Use the file's basename (or shortest unambiguous suffix) plus line number as the link text. The relative path must be dynamically derived — never hardcode the depth.
+6. **Each stop gets one ultra-concise line of framing** (≤15 words) — why this approach was chosen here and what it achieves in the context of the change. No paragraphs.
+
+Format each stop as framing first, link on the next indented line:
+
+```markdown
+## Suggested Review Order
+
+**{Concern name}**
+
+- {one-line framing}
+  [`file.ts:42`](../../src/path/to/file.ts#L42)
+
+- {one-line framing}
+  [`other.ts:17`](../../src/path/to/other.ts#L17)
+
+**{Next concern}**
+
+- {one-line framing}
+  [`file.ts:88`](../../src/path/to/file.ts#L88)
+```
+
+> The `../../` prefix above is illustrative — compute the actual relative path from `{spec_file}`'s directory to each target file.
+
+When there is only one concern, omit the bold label — just list the stops directly.
+
+### Mark Spec Done
+
+Change `{spec_file}` status to `done` in the frontmatter.
+
+Follow `./sync-sprint-status.md` with `{target_status}` = `review`.
+
+### Commit and Open
+
+1. If version control is available and the tree is dirty, create a local commit with a conventional message derived from the spec title.
+2. Open the spec in the user's editor so they can click through the Suggested Review Order:
+   - Resolve two absolute paths: (1) the repository root (`git rev-parse --show-toplevel` — returns the worktree root when in a worktree, project root otherwise; if this fails, fall back to the current working directory), (2) `{spec_file}`. Run `code -r "{absolute-root}" "{absolute-spec-file}"` — the root first so VS Code opens in the right context, then the spec file. Always double-quote paths to handle spaces and special characters.
+   - If `code` is not available (command fails), skip gracefully and tell the user the spec file path instead.
+
+### Display Summary
+
+Display summary of your work to the user, including the commit hash if one was created. Any file paths shown in conversation/terminal output must use CWD-relative format (no leading `/`) with `:line` notation (e.g., `src/path/file.ts:42`) for terminal clickability — the goal is to make paths clickable in terminal emulators. Include:
+
+- A note that the spec is open in their editor (or the file path if it couldn't be opened). Mention that `{spec_file}` now contains a Suggested Review Order.
+- **Navigation tip:** "Ctrl+click (Cmd+click on macOS) the links in the Suggested Review Order to jump to each stop."
+- Offer to push and/or create a pull request.
+
+Workflow complete.
+
+## On Complete
+
+Run: `node {project-root}/_xiaoma/scripts/resolve_customization.js --skill {skill-root} --key workflow.on_complete`
+
+If the resolved `workflow.on_complete` is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.

package/src/xmc-skills/4-implementation/xiaoma-quick-dev/step-oneshot.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+---
+deferred_work_file: '{implementation_artifacts}/deferred-work.md'
+---
+
+# Step One-Shot: Implement, Review, Present
+
+## RULES
+
+- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+- NEVER auto-push.
+
+## INSTRUCTIONS
+
+### Implement
+
+Follow `./sync-sprint-status.md` with `{target_status}` = `in-progress`.
+
+Implement the clarified intent directly.
+
+### Review
+
+Invoke the `xiaoma-review-adversarial-general` skill in a subagent with the changed files. The subagent gets NO conversation context — to avoid anchoring bias. Launch at the same model capability as the current session. If no sub-agents are available, write the changed files to a review prompt file in `{implementation_artifacts}` and HALT. Ask the human to run the review in a separate session and paste back the findings.
+
+### Classify
+
+Deduplicate all review findings. Three categories only:
+
+- **patch** — trivially fixable. Auto-fix immediately.
+- **defer** — pre-existing issue not caused by this change. Append to `{deferred_work_file}`.
+- **reject** — noise. Drop silently.
+
+If a finding is caused by this change but too significant for a trivial patch, HALT and present it to the human for decision before proceeding.
+
+### Generate Spec Trace
+
+Set `{title}` = a concise title derived from the clarified intent.
+
+Write `{spec_file}` using `./spec-template.md`. Fill only these sections — delete all others:
+
+1. **Frontmatter** — set `title: '{title}'`, `type`, `created`, `status: 'done'`. Add `route: 'one-shot'`.
+2. **Title and Intent** — `# {title}` heading and `## Intent` with **Problem** and **Approach** lines. Reuse the summary you already generated for the terminal.
+3. **Suggested Review Order** — append after Intent. Build using the same convention as `./step-05-present.md` § "Generate Suggested Review Order" (spec-file-relative links, concern-based ordering, ultra-concise framing).
+
+Follow `./sync-sprint-status.md` with `{target_status}` = `review`.
+
+### Commit
+
+If version control is available and the tree is dirty, create a local commit with a conventional message derived from the intent. If VCS is unavailable, skip.
+
+### Present
+
+1. Open the spec in the user's editor so they can click through the Suggested Review Order:
+   - Resolve two absolute paths: (1) the repository root (`git rev-parse --show-toplevel` — returns the worktree root when in a worktree, project root otherwise; if this fails, fall back to the current working directory), (2) `{spec_file}`. Run `code -r "{absolute-root}" "{absolute-spec-file}"` — the root first so VS Code opens in the right context, then the spec file. Always double-quote paths to handle spaces and special characters.
+   - If `code` is not available (command fails), skip gracefully and tell the user the spec file path instead.
+2. Display a summary in conversation output, including:
+   - The commit hash (if one was created).
+   - List of files changed with one-line descriptions. Any file paths shown in conversation/terminal output must use CWD-relative format (no leading `/`) with `:line` notation (e.g., `src/path/file.ts:42`) for terminal clickability — this differs from spec-file links which use spec-file-relative paths.
+   - Review findings breakdown: patches applied, items deferred, items rejected. If all findings were rejected, say so.
+   - A note that the spec is open in their editor (or the file path if it couldn't be opened). Mention that `{spec_file}` now contains a Suggested Review Order.
+   - **Navigation tip:** "Ctrl+click (Cmd+click on macOS) the links in the Suggested Review Order to jump to each stop."
+3. Offer to push and/or create a pull request.
+
+HALT and wait for human input.
+
+Workflow complete.
+
+## On Complete
+
+Run: `node {project-root}/_xiaoma/scripts/resolve_customization.js --skill {skill-root} --key workflow.on_complete`
+
+If the resolved `workflow.on_complete` is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.

package/src/xmc-skills/4-implementation/xiaoma-quick-dev/sync-sprint-status.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+# Sync Sprint Status
+
+Shared sub-step for updating `sprint-status.yaml` during quick-dev. Called from any route (plan-code-review, one-shot, future routes) with a `{target_status}` parameter.
+
+## Preconditions
+
+Skip this entire file (return to caller) if ANY of:
+- `{story_key}` is unset
+- `{sprint_status}` does not exist on disk
+
+## Instructions
+
+1. Load the FULL `{sprint_status}` file.
+2. Find the `development_status` entry matching `{story_key}`. If not found, warn the user once (`"{story_key} not found in sprint-status; skipping sprint sync"`) and return to caller.
+3. **Idempotency check.** If `development_status[{story_key}]` is already at `{target_status}` or a later state (`review` is later than `in-progress`; `done` is later than both), return to caller — no write needed. Never regress a story's status.
+4. Set `development_status[{story_key}]` to `{target_status}`.
+5. **Epic lift (only when `{target_status}` = `in-progress`).** Derive the parent epic key as `epic-{N}` from the leading numeric segment of `{story_key}` (e.g., `3-2-digest-delivery` → `epic-3`). If that entry exists and is `backlog`, set it to `in-progress`. Leave it alone otherwise. Skip this sub-step entirely when `{target_status}` is not `in-progress`.
+6. Refresh `last_updated` to the current date.
+7. Save the file, preserving ALL comments and structure including STATUS DEFINITIONS and WORKFLOW NOTES.