@zeyue0329/xiaoma-cli 1.0.49 → 6.0.0-alpha.13

package/xiaoma-core/agents/master-execution-engine.yaml

@@ -1,543 +0,0 @@
-# Master Execution Engine
-# 主执行引擎 - 统一编排和控制中心
-
-meta:
-  name: "Master Execution Engine"
-  version: "2.0"
-  description: "统一执行引擎，编排所有自动化组件，确保全流程质量保证"
-  created_date: "2025-09-10"
-  execution_philosophy: "QUALITY_FIRST_AUTOMATION"
-
-# ========== 引擎架构 ==========
-execution_engine_architecture:
-  components:
-    - component: "enhanced-workflow-orchestrator"
-      role: "WORKFLOW_COORDINATION"
-      responsibility: "任务规划和流程编排"
-
-    - component: "intelligent-template-adapter"
-      role: "TEMPLATE_INTELLIGENCE"
-      responsibility: "模板理解和内容生成"
-
-    - component: "automated-quality-validator"
-      role: "QUALITY_ASSURANCE"
-      responsibility: "多层质量验证和纠错"
-
-    - component: "master-execution-engine"
-      role: "ORCHESTRATION_CONTROL"
-      responsibility: "统一控制和协调"
-
-  integration_model: "MICROSERVICE_ORCHESTRATION"
-  communication_pattern: "EVENT_DRIVEN_WITH_QUALITY_GATES"
-  failure_handling: "CIRCUIT_BREAKER_WITH_ROLLBACK"
-
-# ========== 执行流程定义 ==========
-master_execution_workflow:
-  # ========== 阶段1：初始化和准备 ==========
-  phase_1_initialization:
-    name: "System Initialization and Preparation"
-    duration: "5-10 minutes"
-    quality_gates: 2
-
-    steps:
-      - step: "system_health_check"
-        description: "系统健康检查"
-        actions:
-          - verify_all_components_available
-          - check_template_files_accessibility
-          - validate_project_structure
-          - confirm_write_permissions
-        success_criteria: "ALL_SYSTEMS_OPERATIONAL"
-        failure_action: "ABORT_WITH_DIAGNOSTIC_REPORT"
-
-      - step: "project_context_loading"
-        description: "项目上下文加载"
-        actions:
-          - scan_project_directory_structure
-          - identify_existing_documents
-          - load_template_definitions
-          - extract_project_requirements
-        success_criteria: "CONTEXT_FULLY_LOADED"
-        quality_gate: "CONTEXT_VALIDATION"
-
-      - step: "template_intelligence_activation"
-        description: "模板智能系统激活"
-        actions:
-          - activate_intelligent_template_adapter
-          - perform_template_comprehension_validation
-          - generate_template_application_strategy
-          - validate_template_understanding
-        success_criteria: "TEMPLATE_INTELLIGENCE_READY"
-        quality_gate: "TEMPLATE_UNDERSTANDING_VERIFIED"
-
-      - step: "quality_validation_system_preparation"
-        description: "质量验证系统准备"
-        actions:
-          - initialize_automated_quality_validator
-          - setup_quality_validation_layers
-          - configure_quality_thresholds
-          - prepare_correction_mechanisms
-        success_criteria: "QUALITY_SYSTEM_READY"
-        failure_action: "RECONFIGURE_QUALITY_SYSTEM"
-
-  # ========== 阶段2：智能任务规划 ==========
-  phase_2_intelligent_task_planning:
-    name: "Intelligent Task Planning and Optimization"
-    duration: "10-15 minutes"
-    quality_gates: 3
-
-    steps:
-      - step: "task_scope_analysis"
-        description: "任务范围分析"
-        actions:
-          - analyze_document_requirements
-          - identify_task_dependencies
-          - calculate_optimization_opportunities
-          - generate_execution_plan
-        success_criteria: "COMPREHENSIVE_TASK_ANALYSIS"
-        quality_gate: "TASK_ANALYSIS_VALIDATION"
-
-      - step: "execution_strategy_optimization"
-        description: "执行策略优化"
-        actions:
-          - determine_parallel_processing_opportunities
-          - optimize_resource_allocation
-          - plan_quality_checkpoint_placement
-          - configure_rollback_points
-        success_criteria: "OPTIMIZED_EXECUTION_STRATEGY"
-        quality_gate: "STRATEGY_FEASIBILITY_CHECK"
-
-      - step: "quality_assurance_planning"
-        description: "质量保证规划"
-        actions:
-          - map_quality_validation_requirements
-          - configure_multi_layer_validation
-          - setup_automated_correction_triggers
-          - prepare_quality_reporting_framework
-        success_criteria: "QA_STRATEGY_COMPLETE"
-        quality_gate: "QA_READINESS_VALIDATION"
-
-  # ========== 阶段3：自动化内容生成 ==========
-  phase_3_automated_content_generation:
-    name: "Automated Content Generation with Real-time Quality Assurance"
-    duration: "20-40 minutes per batch"
-    quality_gates: 7 # 对应7层质量验证
-
-    batch_processing_strategy:
-      batch_size: 3
-      parallel_processing: true
-      quality_validation_per_document: true
-      immediate_correction: true
-
-    steps:
-      - step: "document_batch_processing"
-        description: "文档批量处理"
-        actions:
-          - load_document_batch
-          - apply_intelligent_template_adaptation
-          - generate_enhanced_content
-          - perform_immediate_format_validation
-        success_criteria: "BATCH_PROCESSING_SUCCESS"
-        quality_gate: "LAYER_1_SYNTAX_FORMAT_VALIDATION"
-
-      - step: "content_completeness_validation"
-        description: "内容完整性验证"
-        actions:
-          - validate_content_completeness
-          - check_required_sections_presence
-          - verify_information_adequacy
-          - perform_gap_analysis
-        success_criteria: "CONTENT_COMPLETENESS_VERIFIED"
-        quality_gate: "LAYER_2_CONTENT_COMPLETENESS_VALIDATION"
-        failure_action: "AUTOMATED_CONTENT_ENHANCEMENT"
-
-      - step: "content_quality_assurance"
-        description: "内容质量保证"
-        actions:
-          - perform_technical_accuracy_validation
-          - check_clarity_and_readability
-          - verify_professional_quality_standards
-          - conduct_expert_system_review
-        success_criteria: "HIGH_QUALITY_CONTENT_ACHIEVED"
-        quality_gate: "LAYER_3_CONTENT_QUALITY_VALIDATION"
-        failure_action: "ITERATIVE_QUALITY_IMPROVEMENT"
-
-      - step: "consistency_validation_and_correction"
-        description: "一致性验证和纠错"
-        actions:
-          - validate_terminology_consistency
-          - check_structural_consistency
-          - verify_cross_reference_integrity
-          - perform_automated_consistency_correction
-        success_criteria: "CONSISTENCY_STANDARDS_MET"
-        quality_gate: "LAYER_4_CONSISTENCY_VALIDATION"
-        failure_action: "CONSISTENCY_CORRECTION_CYCLE"
-
-      - step: "implementation_feasibility_assessment"
-        description: "实施可行性评估"
-        actions:
-          - validate_database_design_feasibility
-          - assess_api_design_feasibility
-          - verify_implementation_task_feasibility
-          - generate_feasibility_improvement_recommendations
-        success_criteria: "IMPLEMENTATION_FEASIBILITY_CONFIRMED"
-        quality_gate: "LAYER_5_IMPLEMENTATION_FEASIBILITY_VALIDATION"
-        failure_action: "FEASIBILITY_OPTIMIZATION_CYCLE"
-
-      - step: "business_value_alignment_verification"
-        description: "业务价值对齐验证"
-        actions:
-          - validate_requirement_traceability
-          - assess_user_experience_impact
-          - verify_business_objectives_alignment
-          - confirm_stakeholder_value_delivery
-        success_criteria: "BUSINESS_VALUE_ALIGNED"
-        quality_gate: "LAYER_6_BUSINESS_VALUE_VALIDATION"
-        failure_action: "BUSINESS_ALIGNMENT_REFINEMENT"
-
-      - step: "final_integration_validation"
-        description: "最终集成验证"
-        actions:
-          - perform_end_to_end_document_validation
-          - verify_quality_metrics_achievement
-          - conduct_delivery_readiness_assessment
-          - generate_quality_certification
-        success_criteria: "DELIVERY_READY_QUALITY_ACHIEVED"
-        quality_gate: "LAYER_7_FINAL_INTEGRATION_VALIDATION"
-        failure_action: "COMPREHENSIVE_REFINEMENT_CYCLE"
-
-  # ========== 阶段4：跨文档集成验证 ==========
-  phase_4_cross_document_integration:
-    name: "Cross-Document Integration and Global Quality Assurance"
-    duration: "15-25 minutes"
-    quality_gates: 3
-
-    steps:
-      - step: "global_consistency_validation"
-        description: "全局一致性验证"
-        actions:
-          - perform_cross_document_consistency_check
-          - validate_global_terminology_alignment
-          - verify_structural_uniformity
-          - check_cross_reference_integrity
-        success_criteria: "GLOBAL_CONSISTENCY_ACHIEVED"
-        quality_gate: "GLOBAL_CONSISTENCY_VALIDATION"
-
-      - step: "comprehensive_quality_assessment"
-        description: "综合质量评估"
-        actions:
-          - calculate_overall_quality_scores
-          - perform_quality_trend_analysis
-          - generate_quality_improvement_recommendations
-          - prepare_quality_certification_documentation
-        success_criteria: "COMPREHENSIVE_QUALITY_VERIFIED"
-        quality_gate: "COMPREHENSIVE_QUALITY_VALIDATION"
-
-      - step: "integration_testing_and_validation"
-        description: "集成测试和验证"
-        actions:
-          - perform_end_to_end_workflow_testing
-          - validate_implementation_readiness
-          - test_documentation_usability
-          - confirm_delivery_completeness
-        success_criteria: "INTEGRATION_TESTING_PASSED"
-        quality_gate: "INTEGRATION_READINESS_VALIDATION"
-
-  # ========== 阶段5：最终交付准备 ==========
-  phase_5_delivery_preparation:
-    name: "Final Delivery Preparation and Quality Certification"
-    duration: "10-15 minutes"
-    quality_gates: 2
-
-    steps:
-      - step: "comprehensive_reporting_generation"
-        description: "综合报告生成"
-        actions:
-          - generate_executive_quality_summary
-          - create_detailed_quality_analysis_report
-          - prepare_implementation_readiness_certificate
-          - compile_continuous_improvement_recommendations
-        success_criteria: "COMPREHENSIVE_REPORTING_COMPLETE"
-        quality_gate: "REPORTING_QUALITY_VALIDATION"
-
-      - step: "delivery_package_finalization"
-        description: "交付包最终确认"
-        actions:
-          - finalize_all_documentation
-          - perform_final_quality_verification
-          - generate_delivery_certification
-          - prepare_maintenance_and_support_documentation
-        success_criteria: "DELIVERY_PACKAGE_READY"
-        quality_gate: "DELIVERY_READINESS_FINAL_VALIDATION"
-
-      - step: "success_confirmation_and_handover"
-        description: "成功确认和交接"
-        actions:
-          - confirm_all_success_criteria_met
-          - validate_stakeholder_acceptance_criteria
-          - prepare_knowledge_transfer_materials
-          - complete_project_documentation
-        success_criteria: "PROJECT_SUCCESSFULLY_COMPLETED"
-        final_validation: "COMPREHENSIVE_SUCCESS_VERIFICATION"
-
-# ========== 质量门控系统 ==========
-quality_gate_system:
-  gate_types:
-    - type: "CRITICAL_GATE"
-      description: "关键质量门，失败时必须停止"
-      failure_action: "IMMEDIATE_STOP_AND_CORRECTION"
-      retry_policy: "UNLIMITED_RETRIES_UNTIL_SUCCESS"
-
-    - type: "HIGH_PRIORITY_GATE"
-      description: "高优先级质量门，失败时自动纠错"
-      failure_action: "AUTOMATED_CORRECTION_CYCLE"
-      retry_policy: "MAX_3_CORRECTION_ATTEMPTS"
-
-    - type: "STANDARD_GATE"
-      description: "标准质量门，失败时记录并继续"
-      failure_action: "LOG_AND_CONTINUE_WITH_NOTIFICATION"
-      retry_policy: "OPTIONAL_CORRECTION"
-
-  gate_configuration:
-    - phase: "phase_1_initialization"
-      gates: ["CONTEXT_VALIDATION", "TEMPLATE_UNDERSTANDING_VERIFIED"]
-      type: "CRITICAL_GATE"
-
-    - phase: "phase_2_intelligent_task_planning"
-      gates:
-        [
-          "TASK_ANALYSIS_VALIDATION",
-          "STRATEGY_FEASIBILITY_CHECK",
-          "QA_READINESS_VALIDATION",
-        ]
-      type: "CRITICAL_GATE"
-
-    - phase: "phase_3_automated_content_generation"
-      gates:
-        [
-          "LAYER_1_SYNTAX_FORMAT_VALIDATION",
-          "LAYER_2_CONTENT_COMPLETENESS_VALIDATION",
-          "LAYER_3_CONTENT_QUALITY_VALIDATION",
-          "LAYER_4_CONSISTENCY_VALIDATION",
-          "LAYER_5_IMPLEMENTATION_FEASIBILITY_VALIDATION",
-          "LAYER_6_BUSINESS_VALUE_VALIDATION",
-          "LAYER_7_FINAL_INTEGRATION_VALIDATION",
-        ]
-      type: "HIGH_PRIORITY_GATE"
-
-    - phase: "phase_4_cross_document_integration"
-      gates:
-        [
-          "GLOBAL_CONSISTENCY_VALIDATION",
-          "COMPREHENSIVE_QUALITY_VALIDATION",
-          "INTEGRATION_READINESS_VALIDATION",
-        ]
-      type: "CRITICAL_GATE"
-
-    - phase: "phase_5_delivery_preparation"
-      gates:
-        ["REPORTING_QUALITY_VALIDATION", "DELIVERY_READINESS_FINAL_VALIDATION"]
-      type: "CRITICAL_GATE"
-
-# ========== 自动纠错和恢复系统 ==========
-automated_correction_and_recovery_system:
-  correction_strategies:
-    - strategy: "IMMEDIATE_AUTO_CORRECTION"
-      triggers:
-        ["syntax_errors", "format_violations", "missing_required_sections"]
-      actions:
-        - apply_template_format_correction
-        - perform_syntax_standardization
-        - generate_missing_content_sections
-      success_criteria: "ERROR_ELIMINATION"
-      max_attempts: 5
-
-    - strategy: "ITERATIVE_QUALITY_IMPROVEMENT"
-      triggers: ["quality_score_below_threshold", "content_completeness_issues"]
-      actions:
-        - perform_content_enhancement_cycle
-        - apply_quality_improvement_algorithms
-        - conduct_expert_system_optimization
-      success_criteria: "QUALITY_THRESHOLD_ACHIEVEMENT"
-      max_attempts: 3
-
-    - strategy: "COMPREHENSIVE_REFINEMENT_CYCLE"
-      triggers:
-        ["integration_validation_failure", "business_value_misalignment"]
-      actions:
-        - perform_holistic_document_review
-        - apply_comprehensive_improvement_strategies
-        - conduct_stakeholder_alignment_optimization
-      success_criteria: "COMPREHENSIVE_QUALITY_STANDARDS_MET"
-      max_attempts: 2
-
-  recovery_mechanisms:
-    - mechanism: "CHECKPOINT_ROLLBACK"
-      description: "回滚到最近成功检查点"
-      trigger: "CRITICAL_FAILURE_DETECTION"
-      action: "RESTORE_FROM_LAST_SUCCESSFUL_STATE"
-
-    - mechanism: "PARTIAL_RECOVERY"
-      description: "部分恢复和继续"
-      trigger: "NON_CRITICAL_FAILURE"
-      action: "RECOVER_FAILED_COMPONENTS_ONLY"
-
-    - mechanism: "FULL_RESTART"
-      description: "完整重启流程"
-      trigger: "SYSTEMATIC_FAILURE"
-      action: "COMPLETE_WORKFLOW_RESTART"
-
-# ========== 监控和报告系统 ==========
-monitoring_and_reporting_system:
-  real_time_monitoring:
-    - metric: "PHASE_PROGRESS_TRACKING"
-      update_frequency: "REAL_TIME"
-      visualization: "PROGRESS_BAR_WITH_MILESTONES"
-
-    - metric: "QUALITY_SCORE_MONITORING"
-      update_frequency: "PER_VALIDATION_LAYER"
-      visualization: "MULTI_LAYER_QUALITY_DASHBOARD"
-
-    - metric: "ERROR_DETECTION_AND_CORRECTION"
-      update_frequency: "IMMEDIATE"
-      visualization: "ERROR_LOG_WITH_RESOLUTION_STATUS"
-
-    - metric: "PERFORMANCE_METRICS"
-      update_frequency: "CONTINUOUS"
-      visualization: "PERFORMANCE_ANALYTICS_DASHBOARD"
-
-  comprehensive_reporting:
-    - report: "EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_REPORT"
-      content:
-        [
-          "overall_quality_score",
-          "key_achievements",
-          "critical_issues",
-          "recommendations",
-        ]
-      audience: "STAKEHOLDERS_AND_MANAGEMENT"
-
-    - report: "DETAILED_TECHNICAL_REPORT"
-      content:
-        [
-          "layer_by_layer_analysis",
-          "quality_metrics_breakdown",
-          "technical_findings",
-          "improvement_suggestions",
-        ]
-      audience: "TECHNICAL_TEAMS"
-
-    - report: "QUALITY_CERTIFICATION_REPORT"
-      content:
-        [
-          "quality_standards_compliance",
-          "validation_results",
-          "certification_status",
-          "delivery_readiness",
-        ]
-      audience: "QUALITY_ASSURANCE_TEAMS"
-
-    - report: "CONTINUOUS_IMPROVEMENT_REPORT"
-      content:
-        [
-          "process_optimization_opportunities",
-          "quality_trend_analysis",
-          "best_practice_recommendations",
-          "future_enhancement_suggestions",
-        ]
-      audience: "PROCESS_IMPROVEMENT_TEAMS"
-
-# ========== 成功标准和验收准则 ==========
-success_criteria_and_acceptance:
-  technical_success_criteria:
-    overall_quality_score: ">=90"
-    critical_error_count: "0"
-    template_compliance_rate: "100%"
-    content_completeness_score: ">=90"
-    consistency_score: ">=95"
-    implementation_feasibility_score: ">=85"
-    business_value_alignment_score: ">=80"
-
-  process_success_criteria:
-    automated_correction_success_rate: ">=95%"
-    quality_gate_pass_rate: "100%"
-    execution_time_efficiency: "WITHIN_ESTIMATED_TIMEFRAMES"
-    resource_utilization_optimization: "EFFICIENT_RESOURCE_USAGE"
-
-  business_success_criteria:
-    stakeholder_satisfaction: "HIGH"
-    implementation_readiness: "DEVELOPMENT_READY"
-    documentation_usability: "USER_FRIENDLY"
-    maintenance_feasibility: "EASILY_MAINTAINABLE"
-
-  acceptance_validation:
-    - validation: "TECHNICAL_ACCEPTANCE"
-      criteria: "ALL_TECHNICAL_SUCCESS_CRITERIA_MET"
-      validator: "TECHNICAL_EXPERT_SYSTEM"
-
-    - validation: "PROCESS_ACCEPTANCE"
-      criteria: "ALL_PROCESS_SUCCESS_CRITERIA_MET"
-      validator: "PROCESS_MONITORING_SYSTEM"
-
-    - validation: "BUSINESS_ACCEPTANCE"
-      criteria: "ALL_BUSINESS_SUCCESS_CRITERIA_MET"
-      validator: "BUSINESS_VALUE_ASSESSMENT_SYSTEM"
-
-    - validation: "OVERALL_ACCEPTANCE"
-      criteria: "ALL_ACCEPTANCE_VALIDATIONS_PASSED"
-      validator: "COMPREHENSIVE_ACCEPTANCE_FRAMEWORK"
-
-# ========== 配置和个性化设置 ==========
-configuration_and_customization:
-  execution_modes:
-    - mode: "MAXIMUM_QUALITY"
-      description: "最高质量模式，质量优先"
-      quality_thresholds: "HIGHEST_STANDARDS"
-      correction_attempts: "UNLIMITED"
-      validation_depth: "EXHAUSTIVE"
-
-    - mode: "BALANCED_EFFICIENCY"
-      description: "平衡效率模式，质量和效率并重"
-      quality_thresholds: "HIGH_STANDARDS"
-      correction_attempts: "LIMITED_BUT_SUFFICIENT"
-      validation_depth: "COMPREHENSIVE"
-
-    - mode: "RAPID_DELIVERY"
-      description: "快速交付模式，效率优先但保证基本质量"
-      quality_thresholds: "ACCEPTABLE_STANDARDS"
-      correction_attempts: "MINIMAL_SUFFICIENT"
-      validation_depth: "FOCUSED_ON_CRITICAL_ASPECTS"
-
-  customization_options:
-    quality_thresholds: "ADJUSTABLE_PER_PROJECT"
-    validation_layer_configuration: "CUSTOMIZABLE_PER_REQUIREMENT"
-    correction_strategy_selection: "CONFIGURABLE_PER_ERROR_TYPE"
-    reporting_detail_level: "ADJUSTABLE_PER_AUDIENCE"
-
-# ========== 当前推荐配置 ==========
-recommended_configuration:
-  execution_mode: "MAXIMUM_QUALITY"
-  reasoning: "Based on user requirement for comprehensive quality assurance with multiple validation rounds"
-
-  specific_settings:
-    quality_thresholds:
-      overall_minimum_score: 90
-      critical_layer_minimum_score: 95
-      consistency_minimum_score: 95
-      feasibility_minimum_score: 85
-
-    correction_strategies:
-      immediate_correction: "ENABLED_FOR_ALL_CRITICAL_ISSUES"
-      iterative_improvement: "ENABLED_WITH_3_MAX_ATTEMPTS"
-      comprehensive_refinement: "ENABLED_WITH_2_MAX_ATTEMPTS"
-
-    validation_configuration:
-      all_seven_layers: "ENABLED"
-      cross_document_validation: "ENABLED"
-      business_value_validation: "ENABLED"
-      final_integration_validation: "ENABLED"
-
-    reporting_settings:
-      real_time_monitoring: "FULL_DETAIL"
-      comprehensive_reporting: "ALL_REPORT_TYPES"
-      quality_certification: "FORMAL_CERTIFICATION_REQUIRED"

package/xiaoma-core/agents/pm.md

@@ -1,85 +0,0 @@
-# 产品经理
-
-激活通知：此文件包含您完整的智能体操作指南。请勿加载任何外部智能体文件，因为完整的配置位于下方的 YAML 块中。
-
-关键提示：请阅读此文件中紧随其后的完整 YAML 块以理解您的操作参数，启动并严格遵循您的激活指令来改变您的角色状态，并保持此状态直至被告知退出此模式：
-
-## 完整的智能体定义如下 - 无需外部文件
-
-```yaml
-IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
-  - 仅供后续使用 - 不用于激活，当执行引用依赖项的命令时使用
-  - 依赖项映射至 {root}/{type}/{name}
-  - type=文件夹 (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=文件名
-  - 示例: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
-  - 重要提示: 仅在用户请求执行特定命令时才加载这些文件
-REQUEST-RESOLUTION: 灵活匹配用户请求与您的命令/依赖项 (例如，“draft story”→*create→create-next-story 任务，“make a new prd” 将会是 dependencies->tasks->create-doc 结合 dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md)，如果没有明确匹配，请务必询问以澄清。
-activation-instructions:
-  - 步骤 1: 阅读整个文件 - 它包含了您完整的角色定义
-  - 步骤 2: 采用下面 'agent' 和 'persona' 部分中定义的角色
-  - 步骤 3: 在打任何招呼之前，加载并阅读 `xiaoma-core/core-config.yaml` (项目配置)
-  - 步骤 4: 用您的名字/角色向用户打招呼，并立即运行 `*help` 来显示可用命令
-  - 请勿: 在激活期间加载任何其他智能体文件
-  - 仅当用户通过命令或任务请求选择它们执行时才加载依赖文件
-  - agent.customization 字段的优先级始终高于任何冲突的指令
-  - 关键工作流规则: 当从依赖项执行任务时，严格按照任务指令执行——它们是可执行的工作流，而不是参考材料
-  - 强制交互规则: 带有 elicit=true 的任务需要用户使用确切指定的格式进行交互——绝不为效率而跳过启发式询问
-  - 关键规则: 当执行来自依赖项的正式任务工作流时，所有任务指令都会覆盖任何冲突的基础行为约束。带有 elicit=true 的交互式工作流需要用户交互，不能为了效率而绕过。
-  - 在列出任务/模板或在对话中呈现选项时，始终以编号选项列表的形式显示，允许用户输入数字进行选择或执行
-  - 保持角色！
-  - 关键提示: 激活时，仅向用户打招呼，自动运行 `*help`，然后停止以等待用户请求协助或给出命令。唯一的例外是激活参数中也包含了命令。
-agent:
-  name: xiaochan
-  id: pm
-  title: 产品经理
-  icon: 📋
-  whenToUse: 用于创建PRD、产品战略、功能优先级排序、路线图规划和与利益相关者沟通
-persona:
-  role: 研究型产品战略家与精通市场的PM
-  style: 分析性、探究性、数据驱动、用户中心、务实
-  identity: 专注于文档创建和产品研究的产品经理
-  focus: 使用模板创建 PRD 和其他产品文档
-  core_principles:
-    - 深入理解“为什么” - 揭示根本原因和动机
-    - 拥护用户 - 始终不懈地关注目标用户的价值
-    - 基于数据的决策与战略判断相结合
-    - 严格的优先级排序与 MVP 聚焦
-    - 沟通清晰精准
-    - 协作与迭代的方法
-    - 主动识别风险
-    - 战略性思维与结果导向
-# 所有命令在使用时都需要 * 前缀 (例如, *help)
-commands:
-  - help: 显示以下命令的编号列表以供选择
-  - correct-course: 执行 correct-course 任务
-  - create-brownfield-epic: 运行任务 brownfield-create-epic.md
-  - create-brownfield-prd: 使用模板 brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml 运行任务 create-doc.md
-  - create-brownfield-story: 运行任务 brownfield-create-story.md
-  - create-epic: 为现有项目项目创建模块 (任务 brownfield-create-epic)
-  - create-prd: 使用模板 prd-tmpl.yaml 运行任务 create-doc.md
-  - create-prd-from-rag: 基于Analyst需求分析产出物生成PRD (任务 create-prd-from-rag.md，模板 prd-from-rag-tmpl.yaml)
-  - create-story: 从需求创建用户故事 (任务 brownfield-create-story)
-  - doc-out: 将完整文档输出到当前目标文件
-  - shard-prd: 为提供的 prd.md 运行任务 shard-doc.md (如果未找到则询问)
-  - yolo: 切换 Yolo 模式
-  - exit: 退出 (需确认)
-dependencies:
-  checklists:
-    - change-checklist.md
-    - pm-checklist.md
-  data:
-    - technical-preferences.md
-  tasks:
-    - brownfield-create-epic.md
-    - brownfield-create-story.md
-    - correct-course.md
-    - create-deep-research-prompt.md
-    - create-doc.md
-    - create-prd-from-rag.md
-    - execute-checklist.md
-    - shard-doc.md
-  templates:
-    - brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
-    - prd-tmpl.yaml
-    - prd-from-rag-tmpl.yaml
-```