@zeyue0329/xiaoma-cli 1.0.49 → 1.6.4

package/src/xmc/workflows/document-project/workflows/full-scan-instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,1105 @@
+# Full Project Scan Instructions
+
+<workflow>
+
+<critical>This workflow performs complete project documentation (Steps 1-12)</critical>
+<critical>Handles: initial_scan and full_rescan modes</critical>
+
+<step n="0.5" goal="Load documentation requirements data for fresh starts (not needed for resume)" if="resume_mode == false">
+<critical>DATA LOADING STRATEGY - Understanding the Documentation Requirements System:</critical>
+
+<action>Display explanation to user:
+
+**How Project Type Detection Works:**
+
+This workflow uses a single comprehensive CSV file to intelligently document your project:
+
+**documentation-requirements.csv** ({documentation_requirements_csv})
+
+- Contains 12 project types (web, mobile, backend, cli, library, desktop, game, data, extension, infra, embedded)
+- 24-column schema combining project type detection AND documentation requirements
+- **Detection columns**: project_type_id, key_file_patterns (used to identify project type from codebase)
+- **Requirement columns**: requires_api_scan, requires_data_models, requires_ui_components, etc.
+- **Pattern columns**: critical_directories, test_file_patterns, config_patterns, etc.
+- Acts as a "scan guide" - tells the workflow WHERE to look and WHAT to document
+- Example: For project_type_id="web", key_file_patterns includes "package.json;tsconfig.json;\*.config.js" and requires_api_scan=true
+
+**When Documentation Requirements are Loaded:**
+
+- **Fresh Start (initial_scan)**: Load all 12 rows → detect type using key_file_patterns → use that row's requirements
+- **Resume**: Load ONLY the doc requirements row(s) for cached project_type_id(s)
+- **Full Rescan**: Same as fresh start (may re-detect project type)
+- **Deep Dive**: Load ONLY doc requirements for the part being deep-dived
+  </action>
+
+<action>Now loading documentation requirements data for fresh start...</action>
+
+<action>Load documentation-requirements.csv from: {documentation_requirements_csv}</action>
+<action>Store all 12 rows indexed by project_type_id for project detection and requirements lookup</action>
+<action>Display: "Loaded documentation requirements for 12 project types (web, mobile, backend, cli, library, desktop, game, data, extension, infra, embedded)"</action>
+
+<action>Display: "✓ Documentation requirements loaded successfully. Ready to begin project analysis."</action>
+</step>
+
+<step n="0.6" goal="Check for existing documentation and determine workflow mode">
+<action>Check if {project_knowledge}/index.md exists</action>
+
+<check if="index.md exists">
+  <action>Read existing index.md to extract metadata (date, project structure, parts count)</action>
+  <action>Store as {{existing_doc_date}}, {{existing_structure}}</action>
+
+<ask>I found existing documentation generated on {{existing_doc_date}}.
+
+What would you like to do?
+
+1. **Re-scan entire project** - Update all documentation with latest changes
+2. **Deep-dive into specific area** - Generate detailed documentation for a particular feature/module/folder
+3. **Cancel** - Keep existing documentation as-is
+
+Your choice [1/2/3]:
+</ask>
+
+  <check if="user selects 1">
+    <action>Set workflow_mode = "full_rescan"</action>
+    <action>Continue to scan level selection below</action>
+  </check>
+
+  <check if="user selects 2">
+    <action>Set workflow_mode = "deep_dive"</action>
+    <action>Set scan_level = "exhaustive"</action>
+    <action>Initialize state file with mode=deep_dive, scan_level=exhaustive</action>
+    <action>Jump to Step 13</action>
+  </check>
+
+  <check if="user selects 3">
+    <action>Display message: "Keeping existing documentation. Exiting workflow."</action>
+    <action>Exit workflow</action>
+  </check>
+</check>
+
+<check if="index.md does not exist">
+  <action>Set workflow_mode = "initial_scan"</action>
+  <action>Continue to scan level selection below</action>
+</check>
+
+<action if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">Select Scan Level</action>
+
+<check if="workflow_mode == initial_scan OR workflow_mode == full_rescan">
+  <ask>Choose your scan depth level:
+
+**1. Quick Scan** (2-5 minutes) [DEFAULT]
+
+- Pattern-based analysis without reading source files
+- Scans: Config files, package manifests, directory structure
+- Best for: Quick project overview, initial understanding
+- File reading: Minimal (configs, README, package.json, etc.)
+
+**2. Deep Scan** (10-30 minutes)
+
+- Reads files in critical directories based on project type
+- Scans: All critical paths from documentation requirements
+- Best for: Comprehensive documentation for brownfield PRD
+- File reading: Selective (key files in critical directories)
+
+**3. Exhaustive Scan** (30-120 minutes)
+
+- Reads ALL source files in project
+- Scans: Every source file (excludes node_modules, dist, build)
+- Best for: Complete analysis, migration planning, detailed audit
+- File reading: Complete (all source files)
+
+Your choice [1/2/3] (default: 1):
+</ask>
+
+  <action if="user selects 1 OR user presses enter">
+    <action>Set scan_level = "quick"</action>
+    <action>Display: "Using Quick Scan (pattern-based, no source file reading)"</action>
+  </action>
+
+  <action if="user selects 2">
+    <action>Set scan_level = "deep"</action>
+    <action>Display: "Using Deep Scan (reading critical files per project type)"</action>
+  </action>
+
+  <action if="user selects 3">
+    <action>Set scan_level = "exhaustive"</action>
+    <action>Display: "Using Exhaustive Scan (reading all source files)"</action>
+  </action>
+
+<action>Initialize state file: {project_knowledge}/project-scan-report.json</action>
+<critical>Every time you touch the state file, record: step id, human-readable summary (what you actually did), precise timestamp, and any outputs written. Vague phrases are unacceptable.</critical>
+<action>Write initial state:
+{
+"workflow_version": "1.2.0",
+"timestamps": {"started": "{{current_timestamp}}", "last_updated": "{{current_timestamp}}"},
+"mode": "{{workflow_mode}}",
+"scan_level": "{{scan_level}}",
+"project_root": "{{project_root_path}}",
+"project_knowledge": "{{project_knowledge}}",
+"completed_steps": [],
+"current_step": "step_1",
+"findings": {},
+"outputs_generated": ["project-scan-report.json"],
+"resume_instructions": "Starting from step 1"
+}
+</action>
+<action>Continue with standard workflow from Step 1</action>
+</check>
+</step>
+
+<step n="1" goal="Detect project structure and classify project type" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+<action>Ask user: "What is the root directory of the project to document?" (default: current working directory)</action>
+<action>Store as {{project_root_path}}</action>
+
+<action>Scan {{project_root_path}} for key indicators:
+
+- Directory structure (presence of client/, server/, api/, src/, app/, etc.)
+- Key files (package.json, go.mod, requirements.txt, etc.)
+- Technology markers matching detection_keywords from project-types.csv
+  </action>
+
+<action>Detect if project is:
+
+- **Monolith**: Single cohesive codebase
+- **Monorepo**: Multiple parts in one repository
+- **Multi-part**: Separate client/server or similar architecture
+  </action>
+
+<check if="multiple distinct parts detected (e.g., client/ and server/ folders)">
+  <action>List detected parts with their paths</action>
+  <ask>I detected multiple parts in this project:
+  {{detected_parts_list}}
+
+Is this correct? Should I document each part separately? [y/n]
+</ask>
+
+<action if="user confirms">Set repository_type = "monorepo" or "multi-part"</action>
+<action if="user confirms">For each detected part: - Identify root path - Run project type detection using key_file_patterns from documentation-requirements.csv - Store as part in project_parts array
+</action>
+
+<action if="user denies or corrects">Ask user to specify correct parts and their paths</action>
+</check>
+
+<check if="single cohesive project detected">
+  <action>Set repository_type = "monolith"</action>
+  <action>Create single part in project_parts array with root_path = {{project_root_path}}</action>
+  <action>Run project type detection using key_file_patterns from documentation-requirements.csv</action>
+</check>
+
+<action>For each part, match detected technologies and file patterns against key_file_patterns column in documentation-requirements.csv</action>
+<action>Assign project_type_id to each part</action>
+<action>Load corresponding documentation_requirements row for each part</action>
+
+<ask>I've classified this project:
+{{project_classification_summary}}
+
+Does this look correct? [y/n/edit]
+</ask>
+
+<template-output>project_structure</template-output>
+<template-output>project_parts_metadata</template-output>
+
+<action>IMMEDIATELY update state file with step completion:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_1", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Classified as {{repository_type}} with {{parts_count}} parts"}
+- Update current_step = "step_2"
+- Update findings.project_classification with high-level summary only
+- **CACHE project_type_id(s)**: Add project_types array: [{"part_id": "{{part_id}}", "project_type_id": "{{project_type_id}}", "display_name": "{{display_name}}"}]
+- This cached data prevents reloading all CSV files on resume - we can load just the needed documentation_requirements row(s)
+- Update last_updated timestamp
+- Write state file
+  </action>
+
+<action>PURGE detailed scan results from memory, keep only summary: "{{repository_type}}, {{parts_count}} parts, {{primary_tech}}"</action>
+</step>
+
+<step n="2" goal="Discover existing documentation and gather user context" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+<action>For each part, scan for existing documentation using patterns:
+- README.md, README.rst, README.txt
+- CONTRIBUTING.md, CONTRIBUTING.rst
+- ARCHITECTURE.md, ARCHITECTURE.txt, docs/architecture/
+- DEPLOYMENT.md, DEPLOY.md, docs/deployment/
+- API.md, docs/api/
+- Any files in docs/, documentation/, .github/ folders
+</action>
+
+<action>Create inventory of existing_docs with:
+
+- File path
+- File type (readme, architecture, api, etc.)
+- Which part it belongs to (if multi-part)
+  </action>
+
+<ask>I found these existing documentation files:
+{{existing_docs_list}}
+
+Are there any other important documents or key areas I should focus on while analyzing this project? [Provide paths or guidance, or type 'none']
+</ask>
+
+<action>Store user guidance as {{user_context}}</action>
+
+<template-output>existing_documentation_inventory</template-output>
+<template-output>user_provided_context</template-output>
+
+<action>Update state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_2", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Found {{existing_docs_count}} existing docs"}
+- Update current_step = "step_3"
+- Update last_updated timestamp
+  </action>
+
+<action>PURGE detailed doc contents from memory, keep only: "{{existing_docs_count}} docs found"</action>
+</step>
+
+<step n="3" goal="Analyze technology stack for each part" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+<action>For each part in project_parts:
+  - Load key_file_patterns from documentation_requirements
+  - Scan part root for these patterns
+  - Parse technology manifest files (package.json, go.mod, requirements.txt, etc.)
+  - Extract: framework, language, version, database, dependencies
+  - Build technology_table with columns: Category, Technology, Version, Justification
+</action>
+
+<action>Determine architecture pattern based on detected tech stack:
+
+- Use project_type_id as primary indicator (e.g., "web" → layered/component-based, "backend" → service/API-centric)
+- Consider framework patterns (e.g., React → component hierarchy, Express → middleware pipeline)
+- Note architectural style in technology table
+- Store as {{architecture_pattern}} for each part
+  </action>
+
+<template-output>technology_stack</template-output>
+<template-output>architecture_patterns</template-output>
+
+<action>Update state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_3", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Tech stack: {{primary_framework}}"}
+- Update current_step = "step_4"
+- Update findings.technology_stack with summary per part
+- Update last_updated timestamp
+  </action>
+
+<action>PURGE detailed tech analysis from memory, keep only: "{{framework}} on {{language}}"</action>
+</step>
+
+<step n="4" goal="Perform conditional analysis based on project type requirements" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+
+<critical>BATCHING STRATEGY FOR DEEP/EXHAUSTIVE SCANS</critical>
+
+<check if="scan_level == deep OR scan_level == exhaustive">
+  <action>This step requires file reading. Apply batching strategy:</action>
+
+<action>Identify subfolders to process based on: - scan_level == "deep": Use critical_directories from documentation_requirements - scan_level == "exhaustive": Get ALL subfolders recursively (excluding node_modules, .git, dist, build, coverage)
+</action>
+
+<action>For each subfolder to scan: 1. Read all files in subfolder (consider file size - use judgment for files >5000 LOC) 2. Extract required information based on conditional flags below 3. IMMEDIATELY write findings to appropriate output file 4. Validate written document (section-level validation) 5. Update state file with batch completion 6. PURGE detailed findings from context, keep only 1-2 sentence summary 7. Move to next subfolder
+</action>
+
+<action>Track batches in state file:
+findings.batches_completed: [
+{"path": "{{subfolder_path}}", "files_scanned": {{count}}, "summary": "{{brief_summary}}"}
+]
+</action>
+</check>
+
+<check if="scan_level == quick">
+  <action>Use pattern matching only - do NOT read source files</action>
+  <action>Use glob/grep to identify file locations and patterns</action>
+  <action>Extract information from filenames, directory structure, and config files only</action>
+</check>
+
+<action>For each part, check documentation_requirements boolean flags and execute corresponding scans:</action>
+
+<check if="requires_api_scan == true">
+  <action>Scan for API routes and endpoints using integration_scan_patterns</action>
+  <action>Look for: controllers/, routes/, api/, handlers/, endpoints/</action>
+
+  <check if="scan_level == quick">
+    <action>Use glob to find route files, extract patterns from filenames and folder structure</action>
+  </check>
+
+  <check if="scan_level == deep OR scan_level == exhaustive">
+    <action>Read files in batches (one subfolder at a time)</action>
+    <action>Extract: HTTP methods, paths, request/response types from actual code</action>
+  </check>
+
+<action>Build API contracts catalog</action>
+<action>IMMEDIATELY write to: {project_knowledge}/api-contracts-{part_id}.md</action>
+<action>Validate document has all required sections</action>
+<action>Update state file with output generated</action>
+<action>PURGE detailed API data, keep only: "{{api_count}} endpoints documented"</action>
+<template-output>api_contracts\*{part_id}</template-output>
+</check>
+
+<check if="requires_data_models == true">
+  <action>Scan for data models using schema_migration_patterns</action>
+  <action>Look for: models/, schemas/, entities/, migrations/, prisma/, ORM configs</action>
+
+  <check if="scan_level == quick">
+    <action>Identify schema files via glob, parse migration file names for table discovery</action>
+  </check>
+
+  <check if="scan_level == deep OR scan_level == exhaustive">
+    <action>Read model files in batches (one subfolder at a time)</action>
+    <action>Extract: table names, fields, relationships, constraints from actual code</action>
+  </check>
+
+<action>Build database schema documentation</action>
+<action>IMMEDIATELY write to: {project_knowledge}/data-models-{part_id}.md</action>
+<action>Validate document completeness</action>
+<action>Update state file with output generated</action>
+<action>PURGE detailed schema data, keep only: "{{table_count}} tables documented"</action>
+<template-output>data_models\*{part_id}</template-output>
+</check>
+
+<check if="requires_state_management == true">
+  <action>Analyze state management patterns</action>
+  <action>Look for: Redux, Context API, MobX, Vuex, Pinia, Provider patterns</action>
+  <action>Identify: stores, reducers, actions, state structure</action>
+  <template-output>state_management_patterns_{part_id}</template-output>
+</check>
+
+<check if="requires_ui_components == true">
+  <action>Inventory UI component library</action>
+  <action>Scan: components/, ui/, widgets/, views/ folders</action>
+  <action>Categorize: Layout, Form, Display, Navigation, etc.</action>
+  <action>Identify: Design system, component patterns, reusable elements</action>
+  <template-output>ui_component_inventory_{part_id}</template-output>
+</check>
+
+<check if="requires_hardware_docs == true">
+  <action>Look for hardware schematics using hardware_interface_patterns</action>
+  <ask>This appears to be an embedded/hardware project. Do you have:
+  - Pinout diagrams
+  - Hardware schematics
+  - PCB layouts
+  - Hardware documentation
+
+If yes, please provide paths or links. [Provide paths or type 'none']
+</ask>
+<action>Store hardware docs references</action>
+<template-output>hardware*documentation*{part_id}</template-output>
+</check>
+
+<check if="requires_asset_inventory == true">
+  <action>Scan and catalog assets using asset_patterns</action>
+  <action>Categorize by: Images, Audio, 3D Models, Sprites, Textures, etc.</action>
+  <action>Calculate: Total size, file counts, formats used</action>
+  <template-output>asset_inventory_{part_id}</template-output>
+</check>
+
+<action>Scan for additional patterns based on doc requirements:
+
+- config_patterns → Configuration management
+- auth_security_patterns → Authentication/authorization approach
+- entry_point_patterns → Application entry points and bootstrap
+- shared_code_patterns → Shared libraries and utilities
+- async_event_patterns → Event-driven architecture
+- ci_cd_patterns → CI/CD pipeline details
+- localization_patterns → i18n/l10n support
+  </action>
+
+<action>Apply scan_level strategy to each pattern scan (quick=glob only, deep/exhaustive=read files)</action>
+
+<template-output>comprehensive*analysis*{part_id}</template-output>
+
+<action>Update state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_4", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Conditional analysis complete, {{files_generated}} files written"}
+- Update current_step = "step_5"
+- Update last_updated timestamp
+- List all outputs_generated
+  </action>
+
+<action>PURGE all detailed scan results from context. Keep only summaries:
+
+- "APIs: {{api_count}} endpoints"
+- "Data: {{table_count}} tables"
+- "Components: {{component_count}} components"
+  </action>
+  </step>
+
+<step n="5" goal="Generate source tree analysis with annotations" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+<action>For each part, generate complete directory tree using critical_directories from doc requirements</action>
+
+<action>Annotate the tree with:
+
+- Purpose of each critical directory
+- Entry points marked
+- Key file locations highlighted
+- Integration points noted (for multi-part projects)
+  </action>
+
+<action if="multi-part project">Show how parts are organized and where they interface</action>
+
+<action>Create formatted source tree with descriptions:
+
+```
+project-root/
+├── client/          # React frontend (Part: client)
+│   ├── src/
+│   │   ├── components/  # Reusable UI components
+│   │   ├── pages/       # Route-based pages
+│   │   └── api/         # API client layer → Calls server/
+├── server/          # Express API backend (Part: api)
+│   ├── src/
+│   │   ├── routes/      # REST API endpoints
+│   │   ├── models/      # Database models
+│   │   └── services/    # Business logic
+```
+
+</action>
+
+<template-output>source_tree_analysis</template-output>
+<template-output>critical_folders_summary</template-output>
+
+<action>IMMEDIATELY write source-tree-analysis.md to disk</action>
+<action>Validate document structure</action>
+<action>Update state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_5", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Source tree documented"}
+- Update current_step = "step_6"
+- Add output: "source-tree-analysis.md"
+  </action>
+  <action>PURGE detailed tree from context, keep only: "Source tree with {{folder_count}} critical folders"</action>
+  </step>
+
+<step n="6" goal="Extract development and operational information" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+<action>Scan for development setup using key_file_patterns and existing docs:
+- Prerequisites (Node version, Python version, etc.)
+- Installation steps (npm install, etc.)
+- Environment setup (.env files, config)
+- Build commands (npm run build, make, etc.)
+- Run commands (npm start, go run, etc.)
+- Test commands using test_file_patterns
+</action>
+
+<action>Look for deployment configuration using ci_cd_patterns:
+
+- Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml
+- Kubernetes configs (k8s/, helm/)
+- CI/CD pipelines (.github/workflows/, .gitlab-ci.yml)
+- Deployment scripts
+- Infrastructure as Code (terraform/, pulumi/)
+  </action>
+
+<action if="CONTRIBUTING.md or similar found">
+  <action>Extract contribution guidelines:
+    - Code style rules
+    - PR process
+    - Commit conventions
+    - Testing requirements
+  </action>
+</action>
+
+<template-output>development_instructions</template-output>
+<template-output>deployment_configuration</template-output>
+<template-output>contribution_guidelines</template-output>
+
+<action>Update state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_6", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Dev/deployment guides written"}
+- Update current_step = "step_7"
+- Add generated outputs to list
+  </action>
+  <action>PURGE detailed instructions, keep only: "Dev setup and deployment documented"</action>
+  </step>
+
+<step n="7" goal="Detect multi-part integration architecture" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive and project has multiple parts">
+<action>Analyze how parts communicate:
+- Scan integration_scan_patterns across parts
+- Identify: REST calls, GraphQL queries, gRPC, message queues, shared databases
+- Document: API contracts between parts, data flow, authentication flow
+</action>
+
+<action>Create integration_points array with:
+
+- from: source part
+- to: target part
+- type: REST API, GraphQL, gRPC, Event Bus, etc.
+- details: Endpoints, protocols, data formats
+  </action>
+
+<action>IMMEDIATELY write integration-architecture.md to disk</action>
+<action>Validate document completeness</action>
+
+<template-output>integration_architecture</template-output>
+
+<action>Update state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_7", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Integration architecture documented"}
+- Update current_step = "step_8"
+  </action>
+  <action>PURGE integration details, keep only: "{{integration_count}} integration points"</action>
+  </step>
+
+<step n="8" goal="Generate architecture documentation for each part" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+<action>For each part in project_parts:
+  - Use matched architecture template from Step 3 as base structure
+  - Fill in all sections with discovered information:
+    * Executive Summary
+    * Technology Stack (from Step 3)
+    * Architecture Pattern (from registry match)
+    * Data Architecture (from Step 4 data models scan)
+    * API Design (from Step 4 API scan if applicable)
+    * Component Overview (from Step 4 component scan if applicable)
+    * Source Tree (from Step 5)
+    * Development Workflow (from Step 6)
+    * Deployment Architecture (from Step 6)
+    * Testing Strategy (from test patterns)
+</action>
+
+<action if="single part project">
+  - Generate: architecture.md (no part suffix)
+</action>
+
+<action if="multi-part project">
+  - Generate: architecture-{part_id}.md for each part
+</action>
+
+<action>For each architecture file generated:
+
+- IMMEDIATELY write architecture file to disk
+- Validate against architecture template schema
+- Update state file with output
+- PURGE detailed architecture from context, keep only: "Architecture for {{part_id}} written"
+  </action>
+
+<template-output>architecture_document</template-output>
+
+<action>Update state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_8", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Architecture docs written for {{parts_count}} parts"}
+- Update current_step = "step_9"
+  </action>
+  </step>
+
+<step n="9" goal="Generate supporting documentation files" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+<action>Generate project-overview.md with:
+- Project name and purpose (from README or user input)
+- Executive summary
+- Tech stack summary table
+- Architecture type classification
+- Repository structure (monolith/monorepo/multi-part)
+- Links to detailed docs
+</action>
+
+<action>Generate source-tree-analysis.md with:
+
+- Full annotated directory tree from Step 5
+- Critical folders explained
+- Entry points documented
+- Multi-part structure (if applicable)
+  </action>
+
+<action>IMMEDIATELY write project-overview.md to disk</action>
+<action>Validate document sections</action>
+
+<action>Generate source-tree-analysis.md (if not already written in Step 5)</action>
+<action>IMMEDIATELY write to disk and validate</action>
+
+<action>Generate component-inventory.md (or per-part versions) with:
+
+- All discovered components from Step 4
+- Categorized by type
+- Reusable vs specific components
+- Design system elements (if found)
+  </action>
+  <action>IMMEDIATELY write each component inventory to disk and validate</action>
+
+<action>Generate development-guide.md (or per-part versions) with:
+
+- Prerequisites and dependencies
+- Environment setup instructions
+- Local development commands
+- Build process
+- Testing approach and commands
+- Common development tasks
+  </action>
+  <action>IMMEDIATELY write each development guide to disk and validate</action>
+
+<action if="deployment configuration found">
+  <action>Generate deployment-guide.md with:
+    - Infrastructure requirements
+    - Deployment process
+    - Environment configuration
+    - CI/CD pipeline details
+  </action>
+  <action>IMMEDIATELY write to disk and validate</action>
+</action>
+
+<action if="contribution guidelines found">
+  <action>Generate contribution-guide.md with:
+    - Code style and conventions
+    - PR process
+    - Testing requirements
+    - Documentation standards
+  </action>
+  <action>IMMEDIATELY write to disk and validate</action>
+</action>
+
+<action if="API contracts documented">
+  <action>Generate api-contracts.md (or per-part) with:
+    - All API endpoints
+    - Request/response schemas
+    - Authentication requirements
+    - Example requests
+  </action>
+  <action>IMMEDIATELY write to disk and validate</action>
+</action>
+
+<action if="Data models documented">
+  <action>Generate data-models.md (or per-part) with:
+    - Database schema
+    - Table relationships
+    - Data models and entities
+    - Migration strategy
+  </action>
+  <action>IMMEDIATELY write to disk and validate</action>
+</action>
+
+<action if="multi-part project">
+  <action>Generate integration-architecture.md with:
+    - How parts communicate
+    - Integration points diagram/description
+    - Data flow between parts
+    - Shared dependencies
+  </action>
+  <action>IMMEDIATELY write to disk and validate</action>
+
+<action>Generate project-parts.json metadata file:
+`json
+    {
+      "repository_type": "monorepo",
+      "parts": [ ... ],
+      "integration_points": [ ... ]
+    }
+    `
+</action>
+<action>IMMEDIATELY write to disk</action>
+</action>
+
+<template-output>supporting_documentation</template-output>
+
+<action>Update state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_9", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "All supporting docs written"}
+- Update current_step = "step_10"
+- List all newly generated outputs
+  </action>
+
+<action>PURGE all document contents from context, keep only list of files generated</action>
+</step>
+
+<step n="10" goal="Generate master index as primary AI retrieval source" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+
+<critical>INCOMPLETE DOCUMENTATION MARKER CONVENTION:
+When a document SHOULD be generated but wasn't (due to quick scan, missing data, conditional requirements not met):
+
+- Use EXACTLY this marker: _(To be generated)_
+- Place it at the end of the markdown link line
+- Example: - [API Contracts - Server](./api-contracts-server.md) _(To be generated)_
+- This allows Step 11 to detect and offer to complete these items
+- ALWAYS use this exact format for consistency and automated detection
+  </critical>
+
+<action>Create index.md with intelligent navigation based on project structure</action>
+
+<action if="single part project">
+  <action>Generate simple index with:
+    - Project name and type
+    - Quick reference (tech stack, architecture type)
+    - Links to all generated docs
+    - Links to discovered existing docs
+    - Getting started section
+  </action>
+</action>
+
+<action if="multi-part project">
+  <action>Generate comprehensive index with:
+    - Project overview and structure summary
+    - Part-based navigation section
+    - Quick reference by part
+    - Cross-part integration links
+    - Links to all generated and existing docs
+    - Getting started per part
+  </action>
+</action>
+
+<action>Include in index.md:
+
+## Project Documentation Index
+
+### Project Overview
+
+- **Type:** {{repository_type}} {{#if multi-part}}with {{parts.length}} parts{{/if}}
+- **Primary Language:** {{primary_language}}
+- **Architecture:** {{architecture_type}}
+
+### Quick Reference
+
+{{#if single_part}}
+
+- **Tech Stack:** {{tech_stack_summary}}
+- **Entry Point:** {{entry_point}}
+- **Architecture Pattern:** {{architecture_pattern}}
+  {{else}}
+  {{#each parts}}
+
+#### {{part_name}} ({{part_id}})
+
+- **Type:** {{project_type}}
+- **Tech Stack:** {{tech_stack}}
+- **Root:** {{root_path}}
+  {{/each}}
+  {{/if}}
+
+### Generated Documentation
+
+- [Project Overview](./project-overview.md)
+- [Architecture](./architecture{{#if multi-part}}-{part\*id}{{/if}}.md){{#unless architecture_file_exists}} (To be generated) {{/unless}}
+- [Source Tree Analysis](./source-tree-analysis.md)
+- [Component Inventory](./component-inventory{{#if multi-part}}-{part\*id}{{/if}}.md){{#unless component_inventory_exists}} (To be generated) {{/unless}}
+- [Development Guide](./development-guide{{#if multi-part}}-{part\*id}{{/if}}.md){{#unless dev_guide_exists}} (To be generated) {{/unless}}
+  {{#if deployment_found}}- [Deployment Guide](./deployment-guide.md){{#unless deployment_guide_exists}} (To be generated) {{/unless}}{{/if}}
+  {{#if contribution_found}}- [Contribution Guide](./contribution-guide.md){{/if}}
+  {{#if api_documented}}- [API Contracts](./api-contracts{{#if multi-part}}-{part_id}{{/if}}.md){{#unless api_contracts_exists}} (To be generated) {{/unless}}{{/if}}
+  {{#if data_models_documented}}- [Data Models](./data-models{{#if multi-part}}-{part_id}{{/if}}.md){{#unless data_models_exists}} (To be generated) {{/unless}}{{/if}}
+  {{#if multi-part}}- [Integration Architecture](./integration-architecture.md){{#unless integration_arch_exists}} (To be generated) {{/unless}}{{/if}}
+
+### Existing Documentation
+
+{{#each existing_docs}}
+
+- [{{title}}]({{relative_path}}) - {{description}}
+  {{/each}}
+
+### Getting Started
+
+{{getting_started_instructions}}
+</action>
+
+<action>Before writing index.md, check which expected files actually exist:
+
+- For each document that should have been generated, check if file exists on disk
+- Set existence flags: architecture_file_exists, component_inventory_exists, dev_guide_exists, etc.
+- These flags determine whether to add the _(To be generated)_ marker
+- Track which files are missing in {{missing_docs_list}} for reporting
+  </action>
+
+<action>IMMEDIATELY write index.md to disk with appropriate _(To be generated)_ markers for missing files</action>
+<action>Validate index has all required sections and links are valid</action>
+
+<template-output>index</template-output>
+
+<action>Update state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_10", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Master index generated"}
+- Update current_step = "step_11"
+- Add output: "index.md"
+  </action>
+
+<action>PURGE index content from context</action>
+</step>
+
+<step n="11" goal="Validate and review generated documentation" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+<action>Show summary of all generated files:
+Generated in {{project_knowledge}}/:
+{{file_list_with_sizes}}
+</action>
+
+<action>Run validation checklist from {validation}</action>
+
+<critical>INCOMPLETE DOCUMENTATION DETECTION:
+
+1. PRIMARY SCAN: Look for exact marker: _(To be generated)_
+2. FALLBACK SCAN: Look for fuzzy patterns (in case agent was lazy):
+   - _(TBD)_
+   - _(TODO)_
+   - _(Coming soon)_
+   - _(Not yet generated)_
+   - _(Pending)_
+3. Extract document metadata from each match for user selection
+   </critical>
+
+<action>Read {project_knowledge}/index.md</action>
+
+<action>Scan for incomplete documentation markers:
+Step 1: Search for exact pattern "_(To be generated)_" (case-sensitive)
+Step 2: For each match found, extract the entire line
+Step 3: Parse line to extract:
+
+- Document title (text within [brackets] or **bold**)
+- File path (from markdown link or inferable from title)
+- Document type (infer from filename: architecture, api-contracts, data-models, component-inventory, development-guide, deployment-guide, integration-architecture)
+- Part ID if applicable (extract from filename like "architecture-server.md" → part_id: "server")
+  Step 4: Add to {{incomplete_docs_strict}} array
+  </action>
+
+<action>Fallback fuzzy scan for alternate markers:
+Search for patterns: _(TBD)_, _(TODO)_, _(Coming soon)_, _(Not yet generated)_, _(Pending)_
+For each fuzzy match:
+
+- Extract same metadata as strict scan
+- Add to {{incomplete_docs_fuzzy}} array with fuzzy_match flag
+  </action>
+
+<action>Combine results:
+Set {{incomplete_docs_list}} = {{incomplete_docs_strict}} + {{incomplete_docs_fuzzy}}
+For each item store structure:
+{
+"title": "Architecture – Server",
+"file\*path": "./architecture-server.md",
+"doc_type": "architecture",
+"part_id": "server",
+"line_text": "- [Architecture – Server](./architecture-server.md) (To be generated)",
+"fuzzy_match": false
+}
+</action>
+
+<ask>Documentation generation complete!
+
+Summary:
+
+- Project Type: {{project_type_summary}}
+- Parts Documented: {{parts_count}}
+- Files Generated: {{files_count}}
+- Total Lines: {{total_lines}}
+
+{{#if incomplete_docs_list.length > 0}}
+⚠️ **Incomplete Documentation Detected:**
+
+I found {{incomplete_docs_list.length}} item(s) marked as incomplete:
+
+{{#each incomplete_docs_list}}
+{{@index + 1}}. **{{title}}** ({{doc_type}}{{#if part_id}} for {{part_id}}{{/if}}){{#if fuzzy_match}} ⚠️ [non-standard marker]{{/if}}
+{{/each}}
+
+{{/if}}
+
+Would you like to:
+
+{{#if incomplete_docs_list.length > 0}}
+
+1. **Generate incomplete documentation** - Complete any of the {{incomplete_docs_list.length}} items above
+2. Review any specific section [type section name]
+3. Add more detail to any area [type area name]
+4. Generate additional custom documentation [describe what]
+5. Finalize and complete [type 'done']
+   {{else}}
+6. Review any specific section [type section name]
+7. Add more detail to any area [type area name]
+8. Generate additional documentation [describe what]
+9. Finalize and complete [type 'done']
+   {{/if}}
+
+Your choice:
+</ask>
+
+<check if="user selects option 1 (generate incomplete)">
+  <ask>Which incomplete items would you like to generate?
+
+{{#each incomplete_docs_list}}
+{{@index + 1}}. {{title}} ({{doc_type}}{{#if part_id}} - {{part_id}}{{/if}})
+{{/each}}
+{{incomplete_docs_list.length + 1}}. All of them
+
+Enter number(s) separated by commas (e.g., "1,3,5"), or type 'all':
+</ask>
+
+<action>Parse user selection:
+
+- If "all", set {{selected_items}} = all items in {{incomplete_docs_list}}
+- If comma-separated numbers, extract selected items by index
+- Store result in {{selected_items}} array
+  </action>
+
+  <action>Display: "Generating {{selected_items.length}} document(s)..."</action>
+
+  <action>For each item in {{selected_items}}:
+
+1. **Identify the part and requirements:**
+   - Extract part_id from item (if exists)
+   - Look up part data in project_parts array from state file
+   - Load documentation_requirements for that part's project_type_id
+
+2. **Route to appropriate generation substep based on doc_type:**
+
+   **If doc_type == "architecture":**
+   - Display: "Generating architecture documentation for {{part_id}}..."
+   - Load architecture_match for this part from state file (Step 3 cache)
+   - Re-run Step 8 architecture generation logic ONLY for this specific part
+   - Use matched template and fill with cached data from state file
+   - Write architecture-{{part_id}}.md to disk
+   - Validate completeness
+
+   **If doc_type == "api-contracts":**
+   - Display: "Generating API contracts for {{part_id}}..."
+   - Load part data and documentation_requirements
+   - Re-run Step 4 API scan substep targeting ONLY this part
+   - Use scan_level from state file (quick/deep/exhaustive)
+   - Generate api-contracts-{{part_id}}.md
+   - Validate document structure
+
+   **If doc_type == "data-models":**
+   - Display: "Generating data models documentation for {{part_id}}..."
+   - Re-run Step 4 data models scan substep targeting ONLY this part
+   - Use schema_migration_patterns from documentation_requirements
+   - Generate data-models-{{part_id}}.md
+   - Validate completeness
+
+   **If doc_type == "component-inventory":**
+   - Display: "Generating component inventory for {{part_id}}..."
+   - Re-run Step 9 component inventory generation for this specific part
+   - Scan components/, ui/, widgets/ folders
+   - Generate component-inventory-{{part_id}}.md
+   - Validate structure
+
+   **If doc_type == "development-guide":**
+   - Display: "Generating development guide for {{part_id}}..."
+   - Re-run Step 9 development guide generation for this specific part
+   - Use key_file_patterns and test_file_patterns from documentation_requirements
+   - Generate development-guide-{{part_id}}.md
+   - Validate completeness
+
+   **If doc_type == "deployment-guide":**
+   - Display: "Generating deployment guide..."
+   - Re-run Step 6 deployment configuration scan
+   - Re-run Step 9 deployment guide generation
+   - Generate deployment-guide.md
+   - Validate structure
+
+   **If doc_type == "integration-architecture":**
+   - Display: "Generating integration architecture..."
+   - Re-run Step 7 integration analysis for all parts
+   - Generate integration-architecture.md
+   - Validate completeness
+
+3. **Post-generation actions:**
+   - Confirm file was written successfully
+   - Update state file with newly generated output
+   - Add to {{newly_generated_docs}} tracking list
+   - Display: "✓ Generated: {{file_path}}"
+
+4. **Handle errors:**
+   - If generation fails, log error and continue with next item
+   - Track failed items in {{failed_generations}} list
+     </action>
+
+<action>After all selected items are processed:
+
+**Update index.md to remove markers:**
+
+1. Read current index.md content
+2. For each item in {{newly_generated_docs}}:
+   - Find the line containing the file link and marker
+   - Remove the _(To be generated)_ or fuzzy marker text
+   - Leave the markdown link intact
+3. Write updated index.md back to disk
+4. Update state file to record index.md modification
+   </action>
+
+<action>Display generation summary:
+
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+
+✓ **Documentation Generation Complete!**
+
+**Successfully Generated:**
+{{#each newly_generated_docs}}
+
+- {{title}} → {{file_path}}
+  {{/each}}
+
+{{#if failed_generations.length > 0}}
+**Failed to Generate:**
+{{#each failed_generations}}
+
+- {{title}} ({{error_message}})
+  {{/each}}
+  {{/if}}
+
+**Updated:** index.md (removed incomplete markers)
+
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+</action>
+
+<action>Update state file with all generation activities</action>
+
+<action>Return to Step 11 menu (loop back to check for any remaining incomplete items)</action>
+</check>
+
+<action if="user requests other changes (options 2-3)">Make requested modifications and regenerate affected files</action>
+<action if="user selects finalize (option 4 or 5)">Proceed to Step 12 completion</action>
+
+<check if="not finalizing">
+  <action>Update state file:
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_11_iteration", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Review iteration complete"}
+- Keep current_step = "step_11" (for loop back)
+- Update last_updated timestamp
+  </action>
+  <action>Loop back to beginning of Step 11 (re-scan for remaining incomplete docs)</action>
+</check>
+
+<check if="finalizing">
+  <action>Update state file:
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_11", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Validation and review complete"}
+- Update current_step = "step_12"
+  </action>
+  <action>Proceed to Step 12</action>
+</check>
+</step>
+
+<step n="12" goal="Finalize and provide next steps" if="workflow_mode != deep_dive">
+<action>Create final summary report</action>
+<action>Compile verification recap variables:
+  - Set {{verification_summary}} to the concrete tests, validations, or scripts you executed (or "none run").
+  - Set {{open_risks}} to any remaining risks or TODO follow-ups (or "none").
+  - Set {{next_checks}} to recommended actions before merging/deploying (or "none").
+</action>
+
+<action>Display completion message:
+
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+
+## Project Documentation Complete! ✓
+
+**Location:** {{project_knowledge}}/
+
+**Master Index:** {{project_knowledge}}/index.md
+👆 This is your primary entry point for AI-assisted development
+
+**Generated Documentation:**
+{{generated_files_list}}
+
+**Next Steps:**
+
+1. Review the index.md to familiarize yourself with the documentation structure
+2. When creating a brownfield PRD, point the PRD workflow to: {{project_knowledge}}/index.md
+3. For UI-only features: Reference {{project_knowledge}}/architecture-{{ui_part_id}}.md
+4. For API-only features: Reference {{project_knowledge}}/architecture-{{api_part_id}}.md
+5. For full-stack features: Reference both part architectures + integration-architecture.md
+
+**Verification Recap:**
+
+- Tests/extractions executed: {{verification_summary}}
+- Outstanding risks or follow-ups: {{open_risks}}
+- Recommended next checks before PR: {{next_checks}}
+
+**Brownfield PRD Command:**
+When ready to plan new features, run the PRD workflow and provide this index as input.
+
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+</action>
+
+<action>FINALIZE state file:
+
+- Add to completed_steps: {"step": "step_12", "status": "completed", "timestamp": "{{now}}", "summary": "Workflow complete"}
+- Update timestamps.completed = "{{now}}"
+- Update current_step = "completed"
+- Write final state file
+  </action>
+
+<action>Display: "State file saved: {{project_knowledge}}/project-scan-report.json"</action>
+
+</workflow>