@zeyue0329/xiaoma-cli 1.0.24 → 1.0.26
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/ENHANCED_WORKFLOW_OPTIMIZATION.md +225 -0
- package/ENHANCED_WORKFLOW_OPTIMIZATION_SUMMARY.md +293 -0
- package/dist/teams/team-fullstack-with-database.txt +1447 -377
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/tools/installer/package.json +1 -1
- package/xiaoma-core/agents/automated-fix-validator.yaml +578 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/agents/automated-quality-validator.yaml +544 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/agents/enhanced-workflow-orchestrator.yaml +303 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/agents/global-requirements-auditor.yaml +512 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/agents/intelligent-template-adapter.yaml +375 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/agents/issue-dispatcher.yaml +627 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/agents/master-execution-engine.yaml +529 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/agents/requirements-coverage-auditor.yaml +373 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/docs/ENHANCED_WORKFLOW_USAGE_GUIDE.md +306 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/docs/SERIAL_EXECUTION_WORKFLOW_GUIDE.md +347 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/docs/ULTIMATE_AUTOMATION_USAGE_GUIDE.md +291 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/docs/activate-enhanced-workflow.md +154 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/tasks/requirements-coverage-audit.md +198 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/templates/global-qa-monitoring-tmpl.yaml +442 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/templates/requirements-coverage-audit.yaml +329 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/templates/start-enhanced-workflow.yaml +347 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/workflows/enhanced-fullstack-with-database.yaml +177 -14
- package/xiaoma-core/workflows/enhanced-fullstack-with-qa-loop.yaml +766 -0
- package/xiaoma-core/workflows/full-requirement-automation.yaml +1267 -360
|
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Global Requirements Auditor Agent
|
|
2
|
+
# 全局需求实现审计智能体
|
|
3
|
+
|
|
4
|
+
meta:
|
|
5
|
+
name: "Global Requirements Auditor"
|
|
6
|
+
version: "2.0"
|
|
7
|
+
description: "全自动化的全局项目需求实现与质量保证审计智能体,负责终检阶段的深度验证"
|
|
8
|
+
created_date: "2025-09-10"
|
|
9
|
+
specialization: "global_requirements_validation_and_quality_assurance"
|
|
10
|
+
priority: "CRITICAL"
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
# ========== 智能体核心能力 ==========
|
|
13
|
+
agent_capabilities:
|
|
14
|
+
core_competencies:
|
|
15
|
+
- "PRD全覆盖性验证"
|
|
16
|
+
- "用户故事完整性深度检查"
|
|
17
|
+
- "开发任务质量全面审计"
|
|
18
|
+
- "代码实现与需求一致性验证"
|
|
19
|
+
- "测试覆盖度与质量评估"
|
|
20
|
+
- "跨层次依赖关系验证"
|
|
21
|
+
- "自动化问题识别与分类"
|
|
22
|
+
- "智能修复建议生成"
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
verification_dimensions:
|
|
25
|
+
- dimension: "requirements_coverage"
|
|
26
|
+
description: "需求覆盖度验证"
|
|
27
|
+
focus_areas:
|
|
28
|
+
- "功能需求完整性"
|
|
29
|
+
- "非功能需求实现"
|
|
30
|
+
- "业务规则遵循"
|
|
31
|
+
- "边界条件处理"
|
|
32
|
+
- "异常场景覆盖"
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
- dimension: "story_quality"
|
|
35
|
+
description: "用户故事质量评估"
|
|
36
|
+
focus_areas:
|
|
37
|
+
- "INVEST原则符合度"
|
|
38
|
+
- "验收标准可测试性"
|
|
39
|
+
- "技术实现可行性"
|
|
40
|
+
- "业务价值对齐"
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- dimension: "implementation_quality"
|
|
43
|
+
description: "实现质量审计"
|
|
44
|
+
focus_areas:
|
|
45
|
+
- "代码质量指标"
|
|
46
|
+
- "架构设计遵循"
|
|
47
|
+
- "性能基准达标"
|
|
48
|
+
- "安全标准符合"
|
|
49
|
+
- "可维护性评估"
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
# ========== 全局审计执行引擎 ==========
|
|
52
|
+
global_audit_engine:
|
|
53
|
+
# 阶段1:全局数据收集与解析
|
|
54
|
+
phase_1_global_data_collection:
|
|
55
|
+
name: "全局数据收集与智能解析"
|
|
56
|
+
execution_mode: "PARALLEL"
|
|
57
|
+
timeout: 600 # 10分钟
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
collectors:
|
|
60
|
+
- collector: "prd_requirements_collector"
|
|
61
|
+
description: "PRD需求全量收集器"
|
|
62
|
+
sources:
|
|
63
|
+
- "docs/prd.md"
|
|
64
|
+
- "docs/prd/*.md"
|
|
65
|
+
- "docs/requirements/*.md"
|
|
66
|
+
extraction_rules:
|
|
67
|
+
- extract_all_functional_requirements
|
|
68
|
+
- extract_all_non_functional_requirements
|
|
69
|
+
- extract_business_rules_and_constraints
|
|
70
|
+
- extract_acceptance_criteria
|
|
71
|
+
- extract_priority_and_dependencies
|
|
72
|
+
output: "requirements_inventory.json"
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
- collector: "user_stories_collector"
|
|
75
|
+
description: "用户故事全量收集器"
|
|
76
|
+
sources:
|
|
77
|
+
- "docs/stories/*.md"
|
|
78
|
+
- "docs/epics/*.md"
|
|
79
|
+
- "story-implementations/*.md"
|
|
80
|
+
extraction_rules:
|
|
81
|
+
- extract_story_metadata
|
|
82
|
+
- extract_acceptance_criteria
|
|
83
|
+
- extract_task_breakdown
|
|
84
|
+
- extract_implementation_status
|
|
85
|
+
- extract_test_results
|
|
86
|
+
output: "stories_inventory.json"
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
- collector: "implementation_collector"
|
|
89
|
+
description: "实现产物收集器"
|
|
90
|
+
sources:
|
|
91
|
+
- "src/**/*"
|
|
92
|
+
- "tests/**/*"
|
|
93
|
+
- "docs/api/*.md"
|
|
94
|
+
- "database/scripts/*.sql"
|
|
95
|
+
analysis_rules:
|
|
96
|
+
- analyze_code_structure
|
|
97
|
+
- extract_api_endpoints
|
|
98
|
+
- analyze_database_schema
|
|
99
|
+
- extract_test_coverage
|
|
100
|
+
- analyze_documentation
|
|
101
|
+
output: "implementation_inventory.json"
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
# 阶段2:深度映射与覆盖度分析
|
|
104
|
+
phase_2_deep_mapping_analysis:
|
|
105
|
+
name: "深度映射与覆盖度分析"
|
|
106
|
+
execution_mode: "SEQUENTIAL"
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
mapping_engines:
|
|
109
|
+
- engine: "requirement_to_story_mapper"
|
|
110
|
+
description: "需求到故事映射引擎"
|
|
111
|
+
algorithms:
|
|
112
|
+
- semantic_similarity_matching
|
|
113
|
+
- keyword_based_mapping
|
|
114
|
+
- context_aware_association
|
|
115
|
+
- dependency_chain_analysis
|
|
116
|
+
mapping_rules:
|
|
117
|
+
- one_to_many_mapping_allowed
|
|
118
|
+
- bidirectional_traceability_required
|
|
119
|
+
- orphan_detection_enabled
|
|
120
|
+
output: "requirement_story_mapping.json"
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
- engine: "story_to_implementation_mapper"
|
|
123
|
+
description: "故事到实现映射引擎"
|
|
124
|
+
algorithms:
|
|
125
|
+
- code_reference_analysis
|
|
126
|
+
- api_endpoint_matching
|
|
127
|
+
- database_table_association
|
|
128
|
+
- test_case_correlation
|
|
129
|
+
verification_methods:
|
|
130
|
+
- implementation_completeness_check
|
|
131
|
+
- functionality_alignment_verification
|
|
132
|
+
- integration_point_validation
|
|
133
|
+
output: "story_implementation_mapping.json"
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
- engine: "coverage_calculator"
|
|
136
|
+
description: "覆盖度计算引擎"
|
|
137
|
+
metrics:
|
|
138
|
+
- requirement_coverage_percentage
|
|
139
|
+
- story_implementation_percentage
|
|
140
|
+
- test_coverage_percentage
|
|
141
|
+
- documentation_coverage_percentage
|
|
142
|
+
weighted_scoring:
|
|
143
|
+
critical_requirements: 40
|
|
144
|
+
high_priority_requirements: 30
|
|
145
|
+
medium_priority_requirements: 20
|
|
146
|
+
low_priority_requirements: 10
|
|
147
|
+
output: "coverage_metrics.json"
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
# 阶段3:质量深度评估
|
|
150
|
+
phase_3_quality_deep_assessment:
|
|
151
|
+
name: "质量深度评估"
|
|
152
|
+
execution_mode: "PARALLEL"
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
quality_validators:
|
|
155
|
+
- validator: "story_quality_validator"
|
|
156
|
+
description: "用户故事质量验证器"
|
|
157
|
+
validation_criteria:
|
|
158
|
+
invest_compliance:
|
|
159
|
+
independent: 90
|
|
160
|
+
negotiable: 85
|
|
161
|
+
valuable: 95
|
|
162
|
+
estimable: 90
|
|
163
|
+
small: 85
|
|
164
|
+
testable: 95
|
|
165
|
+
content_quality:
|
|
166
|
+
clarity: 90
|
|
167
|
+
completeness: 95
|
|
168
|
+
consistency: 90
|
|
169
|
+
technical_accuracy: 95
|
|
170
|
+
severity_classification:
|
|
171
|
+
critical: "blocks_deployment"
|
|
172
|
+
high: "requires_immediate_fix"
|
|
173
|
+
medium: "should_fix_soon"
|
|
174
|
+
low: "nice_to_have"
|
|
175
|
+
output: "story_quality_report.json"
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
- validator: "implementation_quality_validator"
|
|
178
|
+
description: "实现质量验证器"
|
|
179
|
+
quality_dimensions:
|
|
180
|
+
code_quality:
|
|
181
|
+
- complexity_analysis
|
|
182
|
+
- duplication_detection
|
|
183
|
+
- security_vulnerability_scan
|
|
184
|
+
- performance_profiling
|
|
185
|
+
- maintainability_index
|
|
186
|
+
architecture_compliance:
|
|
187
|
+
- design_pattern_adherence
|
|
188
|
+
- layer_separation_validation
|
|
189
|
+
- dependency_rule_check
|
|
190
|
+
- naming_convention_compliance
|
|
191
|
+
testing_quality:
|
|
192
|
+
- unit_test_coverage
|
|
193
|
+
- integration_test_coverage
|
|
194
|
+
- e2e_test_coverage
|
|
195
|
+
- test_case_quality
|
|
196
|
+
thresholds:
|
|
197
|
+
code_coverage: 80
|
|
198
|
+
complexity_score: 10
|
|
199
|
+
duplication_ratio: 5
|
|
200
|
+
security_score: 90
|
|
201
|
+
output: "implementation_quality_report.json"
|
|
202
|
+
|
|
203
|
+
- validator: "integration_validator"
|
|
204
|
+
description: "集成验证器"
|
|
205
|
+
validation_areas:
|
|
206
|
+
api_integration:
|
|
207
|
+
- endpoint_availability
|
|
208
|
+
- response_format_correctness
|
|
209
|
+
- error_handling_adequacy
|
|
210
|
+
- performance_benchmarks
|
|
211
|
+
database_integration:
|
|
212
|
+
- schema_consistency
|
|
213
|
+
- query_performance
|
|
214
|
+
- transaction_integrity
|
|
215
|
+
- data_validation_rules
|
|
216
|
+
frontend_backend_integration:
|
|
217
|
+
- data_flow_correctness
|
|
218
|
+
- state_management_validation
|
|
219
|
+
- error_propagation_handling
|
|
220
|
+
- user_experience_consistency
|
|
221
|
+
output: "integration_validation_report.json"
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
# 阶段4:问题识别与分类
|
|
224
|
+
phase_4_issue_identification:
|
|
225
|
+
name: "智能问题识别与分类"
|
|
226
|
+
|
|
227
|
+
issue_detectors:
|
|
228
|
+
- detector: "coverage_gap_detector"
|
|
229
|
+
description: "覆盖度差距检测器"
|
|
230
|
+
detection_rules:
|
|
231
|
+
- unmapped_requirements
|
|
232
|
+
- incomplete_stories
|
|
233
|
+
- missing_implementations
|
|
234
|
+
- insufficient_testing
|
|
235
|
+
gap_analysis:
|
|
236
|
+
quantitative_gaps:
|
|
237
|
+
- coverage_percentage_shortfall
|
|
238
|
+
- missing_component_count
|
|
239
|
+
- incomplete_task_count
|
|
240
|
+
qualitative_gaps:
|
|
241
|
+
- quality_standard_deviation
|
|
242
|
+
- consistency_violations
|
|
243
|
+
- best_practice_non_compliance
|
|
244
|
+
output: "coverage_gaps.json"
|
|
245
|
+
|
|
246
|
+
- detector: "quality_issue_detector"
|
|
247
|
+
description: "质量问题检测器"
|
|
248
|
+
issue_categories:
|
|
249
|
+
functional_issues:
|
|
250
|
+
- incorrect_implementation
|
|
251
|
+
- missing_functionality
|
|
252
|
+
- broken_features
|
|
253
|
+
non_functional_issues:
|
|
254
|
+
- performance_degradation
|
|
255
|
+
- security_vulnerabilities
|
|
256
|
+
- usability_problems
|
|
257
|
+
technical_debt:
|
|
258
|
+
- code_smell_detection
|
|
259
|
+
- architecture_violations
|
|
260
|
+
- documentation_gaps
|
|
261
|
+
severity_scoring:
|
|
262
|
+
formula: "impact * likelihood * detectability"
|
|
263
|
+
thresholds:
|
|
264
|
+
critical: 80
|
|
265
|
+
high: 60
|
|
266
|
+
medium: 40
|
|
267
|
+
low: 20
|
|
268
|
+
output: "quality_issues.json"
|
|
269
|
+
|
|
270
|
+
issue_classifier:
|
|
271
|
+
classification_dimensions:
|
|
272
|
+
- by_severity: ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]
|
|
273
|
+
- by_type: ["functional", "non_functional", "technical_debt", "documentation"]
|
|
274
|
+
- by_component: ["frontend", "backend", "database", "api", "infrastructure"]
|
|
275
|
+
- by_effort: ["quick_fix", "moderate_effort", "significant_effort", "major_rework"]
|
|
276
|
+
priority_matrix:
|
|
277
|
+
high_impact_low_effort: "IMMEDIATE"
|
|
278
|
+
high_impact_high_effort: "HIGH"
|
|
279
|
+
low_impact_low_effort: "MEDIUM"
|
|
280
|
+
low_impact_high_effort: "LOW"
|
|
281
|
+
output: "classified_issues.json"
|
|
282
|
+
|
|
283
|
+
# ========== 智能反馈与修复建议生成 ==========
|
|
284
|
+
intelligent_feedback_generator:
|
|
285
|
+
feedback_strategies:
|
|
286
|
+
- strategy: "root_cause_analysis"
|
|
287
|
+
description: "根因分析策略"
|
|
288
|
+
techniques:
|
|
289
|
+
- "5_why_analysis"
|
|
290
|
+
- "fishbone_diagram"
|
|
291
|
+
- "fault_tree_analysis"
|
|
292
|
+
- "pareto_analysis"
|
|
293
|
+
output_format: "structured_root_cause_report"
|
|
294
|
+
|
|
295
|
+
- strategy: "solution_recommendation"
|
|
296
|
+
description: "解决方案推荐策略"
|
|
297
|
+
recommendation_types:
|
|
298
|
+
quick_wins:
|
|
299
|
+
- "immediate_fixes"
|
|
300
|
+
- "configuration_changes"
|
|
301
|
+
- "documentation_updates"
|
|
302
|
+
systematic_improvements:
|
|
303
|
+
- "refactoring_suggestions"
|
|
304
|
+
- "architecture_enhancements"
|
|
305
|
+
- "process_optimizations"
|
|
306
|
+
strategic_changes:
|
|
307
|
+
- "technology_upgrades"
|
|
308
|
+
- "methodology_changes"
|
|
309
|
+
- "team_skill_development"
|
|
310
|
+
confidence_scoring:
|
|
311
|
+
high_confidence: "proven_solution_with_examples"
|
|
312
|
+
medium_confidence: "recommended_best_practice"
|
|
313
|
+
low_confidence: "experimental_suggestion"
|
|
314
|
+
|
|
315
|
+
- strategy: "action_plan_generation"
|
|
316
|
+
description: "行动计划生成策略"
|
|
317
|
+
plan_components:
|
|
318
|
+
immediate_actions:
|
|
319
|
+
timeframe: "0-24_hours"
|
|
320
|
+
focus: "critical_blockers"
|
|
321
|
+
resources: "existing_team"
|
|
322
|
+
short_term_plan:
|
|
323
|
+
timeframe: "1-2_weeks"
|
|
324
|
+
focus: "high_priority_issues"
|
|
325
|
+
resources: "current_sprint_capacity"
|
|
326
|
+
long_term_roadmap:
|
|
327
|
+
timeframe: "1-3_months"
|
|
328
|
+
focus: "systematic_improvements"
|
|
329
|
+
resources: "planned_allocation"
|
|
330
|
+
task_specification:
|
|
331
|
+
- clear_description
|
|
332
|
+
- specific_acceptance_criteria
|
|
333
|
+
- estimated_effort
|
|
334
|
+
- required_skills
|
|
335
|
+
- dependency_identification
|
|
336
|
+
|
|
337
|
+
# ========== 自动化修复触发机制 ==========
|
|
338
|
+
automated_fix_triggers:
|
|
339
|
+
trigger_conditions:
|
|
340
|
+
immediate_trigger:
|
|
341
|
+
- "critical_functionality_missing"
|
|
342
|
+
- "security_vulnerability_detected"
|
|
343
|
+
- "data_integrity_issue"
|
|
344
|
+
- "deployment_blocker"
|
|
345
|
+
|
|
346
|
+
batch_trigger:
|
|
347
|
+
- "multiple_related_issues"
|
|
348
|
+
- "systematic_problems"
|
|
349
|
+
- "technical_debt_threshold_exceeded"
|
|
350
|
+
|
|
351
|
+
scheduled_trigger:
|
|
352
|
+
- "regular_quality_improvement"
|
|
353
|
+
- "periodic_optimization"
|
|
354
|
+
- "preventive_maintenance"
|
|
355
|
+
|
|
356
|
+
fix_routing_rules:
|
|
357
|
+
- rule: "requirement_coverage_gap"
|
|
358
|
+
target_agent: "sm"
|
|
359
|
+
action: "create_missing_stories"
|
|
360
|
+
priority: "HIGH"
|
|
361
|
+
validation_required: true
|
|
362
|
+
|
|
363
|
+
- rule: "story_quality_issue"
|
|
364
|
+
target_agent: "sm"
|
|
365
|
+
action: "refine_user_story"
|
|
366
|
+
priority: "MEDIUM"
|
|
367
|
+
validation_required: true
|
|
368
|
+
|
|
369
|
+
- rule: "implementation_defect"
|
|
370
|
+
target_agent: "dev"
|
|
371
|
+
action: "fix_implementation"
|
|
372
|
+
priority: "HIGH"
|
|
373
|
+
validation_required: true
|
|
374
|
+
|
|
375
|
+
- rule: "test_coverage_gap"
|
|
376
|
+
target_agent: "qa"
|
|
377
|
+
action: "create_missing_tests"
|
|
378
|
+
priority: "MEDIUM"
|
|
379
|
+
validation_required: false
|
|
380
|
+
|
|
381
|
+
- rule: "documentation_gap"
|
|
382
|
+
target_agent: "doc"
|
|
383
|
+
action: "update_documentation"
|
|
384
|
+
priority: "LOW"
|
|
385
|
+
validation_required: false
|
|
386
|
+
|
|
387
|
+
# ========== 报告生成配置 ==========
|
|
388
|
+
report_generation:
|
|
389
|
+
report_types:
|
|
390
|
+
executive_dashboard:
|
|
391
|
+
format: "markdown"
|
|
392
|
+
sections:
|
|
393
|
+
- overall_health_score
|
|
394
|
+
- critical_findings
|
|
395
|
+
- coverage_summary
|
|
396
|
+
- quality_metrics
|
|
397
|
+
- recommended_actions
|
|
398
|
+
visualization:
|
|
399
|
+
- coverage_heatmap
|
|
400
|
+
- quality_radar_chart
|
|
401
|
+
- issue_distribution_pie
|
|
402
|
+
- trend_analysis_graph
|
|
403
|
+
|
|
404
|
+
detailed_audit_report:
|
|
405
|
+
format: "markdown"
|
|
406
|
+
sections:
|
|
407
|
+
- comprehensive_coverage_analysis
|
|
408
|
+
- requirement_traceability_matrix
|
|
409
|
+
- story_quality_assessment
|
|
410
|
+
- implementation_verification_results
|
|
411
|
+
- identified_gaps_and_issues
|
|
412
|
+
- root_cause_analysis
|
|
413
|
+
- detailed_recommendations
|
|
414
|
+
appendices:
|
|
415
|
+
- raw_data_dumps
|
|
416
|
+
- calculation_methodology
|
|
417
|
+
- reference_documentation
|
|
418
|
+
|
|
419
|
+
action_tracking_report:
|
|
420
|
+
format: "json"
|
|
421
|
+
tracking_elements:
|
|
422
|
+
- issue_id
|
|
423
|
+
- description
|
|
424
|
+
- severity
|
|
425
|
+
- assigned_agent
|
|
426
|
+
- proposed_action
|
|
427
|
+
- estimated_effort
|
|
428
|
+
- target_completion
|
|
429
|
+
- validation_criteria
|
|
430
|
+
- current_status
|
|
431
|
+
|
|
432
|
+
# ========== 质量门控配置 ==========
|
|
433
|
+
quality_gates:
|
|
434
|
+
mandatory_gates:
|
|
435
|
+
- gate: "critical_requirements_coverage"
|
|
436
|
+
threshold: 100
|
|
437
|
+
failure_action: "BLOCK_PROGRESSION"
|
|
438
|
+
|
|
439
|
+
- gate: "high_priority_story_completeness"
|
|
440
|
+
threshold: 95
|
|
441
|
+
failure_action: "REQUIRE_APPROVAL"
|
|
442
|
+
|
|
443
|
+
- gate: "security_vulnerability_count"
|
|
444
|
+
threshold: 0
|
|
445
|
+
failure_action: "BLOCK_PROGRESSION"
|
|
446
|
+
|
|
447
|
+
- gate: "integration_test_pass_rate"
|
|
448
|
+
threshold: 98
|
|
449
|
+
failure_action: "REQUIRE_FIX"
|
|
450
|
+
|
|
451
|
+
recommended_gates:
|
|
452
|
+
- gate: "overall_coverage"
|
|
453
|
+
threshold: 90
|
|
454
|
+
failure_action: "WARNING"
|
|
455
|
+
|
|
456
|
+
- gate: "code_quality_score"
|
|
457
|
+
threshold: 85
|
|
458
|
+
failure_action: "RECOMMENDATION"
|
|
459
|
+
|
|
460
|
+
- gate: "documentation_completeness"
|
|
461
|
+
threshold: 80
|
|
462
|
+
failure_action: "NOTIFICATION"
|
|
463
|
+
|
|
464
|
+
# ========== 执行配置 ==========
|
|
465
|
+
execution_configuration:
|
|
466
|
+
execution_modes:
|
|
467
|
+
comprehensive_audit:
|
|
468
|
+
description: "全面深度审计"
|
|
469
|
+
scope: "entire_project"
|
|
470
|
+
depth: "maximum"
|
|
471
|
+
duration: "30-45_minutes"
|
|
472
|
+
parallelization: true
|
|
473
|
+
|
|
474
|
+
incremental_audit:
|
|
475
|
+
description: "增量审计"
|
|
476
|
+
scope: "changed_components"
|
|
477
|
+
depth: "focused"
|
|
478
|
+
duration: "10-15_minutes"
|
|
479
|
+
parallelization: true
|
|
480
|
+
|
|
481
|
+
continuous_monitoring:
|
|
482
|
+
description: "持续监控模式"
|
|
483
|
+
scope: "real_time_changes"
|
|
484
|
+
depth: "adaptive"
|
|
485
|
+
duration: "ongoing"
|
|
486
|
+
parallelization: false
|
|
487
|
+
|
|
488
|
+
performance_optimization:
|
|
489
|
+
caching_strategy: "aggressive"
|
|
490
|
+
parallel_workers: 8
|
|
491
|
+
memory_limit: "4GB"
|
|
492
|
+
timeout_handling: "graceful_degradation"
|
|
493
|
+
|
|
494
|
+
# ========== 成功标准 ==========
|
|
495
|
+
success_criteria:
|
|
496
|
+
audit_effectiveness:
|
|
497
|
+
- "100%需求识别准确率"
|
|
498
|
+
- "零误报率"
|
|
499
|
+
- "全面问题检测覆盖"
|
|
500
|
+
- "可操作建议生成率>95%"
|
|
501
|
+
|
|
502
|
+
automation_efficiency:
|
|
503
|
+
- "自动问题分类准确率>90%"
|
|
504
|
+
- "智能路由成功率>95%"
|
|
505
|
+
- "修复建议采纳率>80%"
|
|
506
|
+
- "端到端执行时间<45分钟"
|
|
507
|
+
|
|
508
|
+
business_value:
|
|
509
|
+
- "关键需求100%验证"
|
|
510
|
+
- "质量问题早期发现率>90%"
|
|
511
|
+
- "修复成本降低>50%"
|
|
512
|
+
- "交付信心度提升>95%"
|