@zenuml/core 3.47.9 → 3.48.1

package/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-03-30-self-correcting-scoring.md

@@ -1,206 +0,0 @@
-# Self-Correcting Dia-Scoring Implementation Plan
-
-> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
-
-**Goal:** Add a gap-detection and self-correction validation loop to the dia-scoring skill so it automatically detects and fixes analyzer blind spots during normal scoring runs.
-
-**Architecture:** The entire change is a new section in `SKILL.md` — behavioral instructions that tell the agent to cross-reference the diff panel's pixel clusters against the analyzer's coverage map, triage unaccounted clusters, and fix `collect-data.mjs` when the gap is a selector/extraction miss. No new scripts or tooling.
-
-**Tech Stack:** Markdown (SKILL.md), Playwright browser_evaluate (runtime), collect-data.mjs (runtime fixes)
-
----
-
-### Task 1: Add "Gap Detection and Self-Correction" section to SKILL.md
-
-**Files:**
-- Modify: `/Users/pengxiao/.claude/skills/dia-scoring/SKILL.md` (append new section after the existing "Known Analyzer Internals" section, before "Commands")
-
-- [ ] **Step 1: Add the new section**
-
-Open `/Users/pengxiao/.claude/skills/dia-scoring/SKILL.md` and insert the following section between the "Known Analyzer Internals" section (line 167) and the "Commands" section (line 175):
-
-```markdown
-## Gap Detection and Self-Correction
-
-After running the analyzer and producing the JSON report, **automatically validate** that the report covers all visible diff clusters. Do not wait for the user to request calibration.
-
-### Step 1: Build a Coverage Map
-
-Collect every fine-grained bounding box from the analyzer JSON:
-- `html_box` / `svg_box` from labels, numbers, arrows
-- `html_icon_box` / `svg_icon_box` from participant icons
-- `label_box` from participant labels
-- `stereotype_box`, `comment_box`, `divider_box`, occurrence boxes, etc.
-
-Use the most specific boxes available (e.g., `icon_box` rather than the coarse `participant_box`) to avoid masking sub-element gaps.
-
-### Step 2: Find Unaccounted Diff Clusters
-
-Scan the `#diff-panel canvas` for connected clusters of red (HTML-only) or blue (SVG-only) pixels. Filter noise (clusters < 20 pixels). A cluster is **covered** when:
-
-- The cluster's centroid falls inside a reported element's bounding box, OR
-- The overlap between the cluster and a reported element's box is >= 30% of the cluster's area
-
-Clusters meeting neither condition are **unaccounted** and trigger investigation.
-
-`colorDiff` (purple) pixels within a covered region are expected and do not trigger investigation.
-
-### Step 3: Verify Coordinate Mapping
-
-Before inspecting the DOM at gap coordinates:
-
-1. Derive an initial canvas-to-page mapping from frame/canvas geometry (canvas natural size / frame CSS size).
-2. Probe a known anchor — pick a reported element with known page coordinates and verify the mapping lands on it via `document.elementFromPoint`.
-3. If the probe hits the wrong panel, empty space, or an unrelated element, recalibrate once using the probe result.
-4. If the mapping still fails after one recalibration, mark the cluster as `uncertain` and move on.
-
-### Step 4: Inspect DOM at Gap Coordinates
-
-For each unaccounted cluster with a verified mapping:
-
-1. Use `document.elementFromPoint(x, y)` on both the HTML and SVG panels.
-2. Walk up to the semantic parent (participant, message, fragment) to understand the element's role.
-3. Classify: emoji icon, stereotype, arrow, label, or novel element.
-
-### Step 5: Triage
-
-Classify each gap before acting:
-
-- **`likely_analyzer_gap`** — Element exists on both sides, belongs to an existing scoring category (icons, labels, stereotypes, etc.), but the collection logic missed it. Proceed to fix.
-- **`likely_renderer_residual`** — Element exists on only one side, or the difference is a genuine rendering discrepancy. Report in scoring output but do not modify the analyzer.
-- **`uncertain`** — Cannot determine cause confidently. Report with DOM context and coordinates for manual review.
-
-Only `likely_analyzer_gap` triggers a self-fix.
-
-### Step 6: Fix the Collection Logic
-
-For `likely_analyzer_gap` clusters:
-
-1. Read the relevant collection function in `collect-data.mjs` (e.g., `collectHtmlParticipants` for participant sub-elements).
-2. Compare the function's selectors and extraction logic against the actual DOM element's tag, classes, and attributes.
-3. Identify why it wasn't matched.
-4. Fix the collection logic. This may include: adding selector patterns, adding fallback extraction paths, adjusting pairing logic, or modifying measurement paths. Keep changes targeted — no broad refactors.
-
-This fixes the measurement tool, not the renderers.
-
-### Step 7: Re-run and Verify
-
-1. Re-run the analyzer on the target case. Confirm the previously-unaccounted cluster is now covered and semantically correct.
-2. Run 1-2 sibling cases with the same element family and confirm: populated data, no regression in previously-working sections.
-
-### Safety Limits
-
-- Maximum **2 fix-and-rerun iterations** per scoring session.
-- Only auto-fix `likely_analyzer_gap` that maps to an existing scoring category and collection function.
-- Novel element types (no existing category): report as unresolved with element identity and coordinates.
-
-### Limitations
-
-- **Invisible diffs**: If an element renders identically in both HTML and SVG (no diff pixels), this loop cannot detect that the analyzer doesn't cover it. The loop is reactive to visible differences only.
-- **Novel categories**: The loop can detect and report novel element types but does not create new scoring categories autonomously.
-```
-
-- [ ] **Step 2: Update the participant icons scope line**
-
-In the same file, find line 74:
-
-```markdown
-  - participant icons (actor, database, ec2, lambda, azurefunction, sqs, sns, iam, boundary, control, entity)
-```
-
-Replace with:
-
-```markdown
-  - participant icons (actor, database, ec2, lambda, azurefunction, sqs, sns, iam, boundary, control, entity, and emoji-based icons like 🌐, 🔒, 🗄️)
-```
-
-This documents that emoji icons are in scope, which the self-correction loop discovered.
-
-- [ ] **Step 3: Verify the edit is well-formed**
-
-Read the modified SKILL.md and confirm:
-- The new section appears between "Known Analyzer Internals" and "Commands"
-- No existing sections were accidentally modified
-- The markdown renders correctly (no broken formatting)
-
-Run: `cat /Users/pengxiao/.claude/skills/dia-scoring/SKILL.md | head -250`
-Expected: The new "Gap Detection and Self-Correction" section is visible, followed by the existing "Commands" section.
-
-- [ ] **Step 4: Commit**
-
-```bash
-cd /Users/pengxiao/workspaces/zenuml/mmd-zenuml-core
-git add /Users/pengxiao/.claude/skills/dia-scoring/SKILL.md
-git commit -m "feat(dia-scoring): add gap detection and self-correction validation loop"
-```
-
----
-
-### Task 2: Validate the self-correction loop on the emoji-async-return case
-
-This task verifies the new skill instructions work end-to-end by running a scoring session on the case that originally exposed the gap.
-
-**Files:**
-- No files created or modified — this is a validation task
-
-- [ ] **Step 1: Run the analyzer on emoji-async-return**
-
-```bash
-cd /Users/pengxiao/workspaces/zenuml/mmd-zenuml-core
-node scripts/analyze-compare-case.mjs --case emoji-async-return --json 2>&1 | python3 -c "
-import json, sys
-data = json.load(sys.stdin)
-icons = data.get('participant_icons', [])
-print(f'participant_icons count: {len(icons)}')
-for icon in icons:
-    print(f'  {icon.get(\"name\", \"?\")} — presence html:{icon.get(\"presence\",{}).get(\"html\")} svg:{icon.get(\"presence\",{}).get(\"svg\")} status:{icon.get(\"status\")}')
-"
-```
-
-Expected: `participant_icons count: 0` (the analyzer doesn't detect emoji icons yet — this confirms the gap exists before the self-correction loop runs).
-
-- [ ] **Step 2: Navigate to the compare-case page and read the diff panel**
-
-Using Playwright:
-1. Navigate to `http://localhost:8080/e2e/tools/compare-case.html?case=emoji-async-return`
-2. Wait for `[native-diff-ext] Done!` in console
-3. Read the `#diff-panel canvas` pixel data via `browser_evaluate`
-4. Identify unaccounted clusters in the participant icon region
-
-Expected: The diff panel shows HTML-only and SVG-only pixel clusters around the emoji icons (🌐, 🔒, 🗄️) that are not covered by any reported element in the analyzer output.
-
-- [ ] **Step 3: Follow the self-correction loop**
-
-Execute steps 1-7 of the new "Gap Detection and Self-Correction" section:
-1. Build coverage map from analyzer JSON
-2. Find unaccounted clusters (the icon regions)
-3. Verify coordinate mapping with a known anchor probe
-4. Inspect DOM at gap coordinates — find `span.mr-1.flex-shrink-0` (HTML) and emoji `tspan` (SVG)
-5. Triage as `likely_analyzer_gap` (element exists on both sides, belongs to participant icons category)
-6. Fix `collect-data.mjs` — add emoji icon detection to both `collectHtmlParticipants` and `collectSvgParticipants`
-7. Re-run analyzer, verify icons are now detected. Run 1-2 sibling emoji cases.
-
-Expected: After the fix, `participant_icons count: 3` with all three emoji icons detected and scored.
-
-- [ ] **Step 4: Commit the collect-data.mjs fix**
-
-```bash
-cd /Users/pengxiao/workspaces/zenuml/mmd-zenuml-core
-git add scripts/analyze-compare-case/collect-data.mjs
-git commit -m "fix(analyzer): detect emoji-based participant icons in collect-data"
-```
-
----
-
-### Task 3: Commit the design spec
-
-**Files:**
-- Stage: `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-03-30-self-correcting-scoring-design.md`
-
-- [ ] **Step 1: Commit the spec**
-
-```bash
-cd /Users/pengxiao/workspaces/zenuml/mmd-zenuml-core
-git add docs/superpowers/specs/2026-03-30-self-correcting-scoring-design.md
-git commit -m "docs: add self-correcting dia-scoring design spec"
-```