@zeniai/client-epic-state 5.1.85-betaRD1 → 5.1.85
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/lib/entity/aiCfo/aiCfoReducer.js +1 -3
- package/lib/entity/company/companyReducer.js +4 -1
- package/lib/entity/depositAccount/depositAccountReducer.js +3 -1
- package/lib/entity/tenant/tenantReducer.js +4 -1
- package/lib/entity/transaction/transactionReducer.js +3 -2
- package/lib/entity/vendorExpense/vendorExpenseReducer.js +3 -1
- package/lib/esm/entity/aiCfo/aiCfoReducer.js +1 -3
- package/lib/esm/entity/company/companyReducer.js +4 -1
- package/lib/esm/entity/depositAccount/depositAccountReducer.js +3 -1
- package/lib/esm/entity/tenant/tenantReducer.js +4 -1
- package/lib/esm/entity/transaction/transactionReducer.js +3 -2
- package/lib/esm/entity/vendorExpense/vendorExpenseReducer.js +3 -1
- package/lib/esm/view/auditReportView/auditReportViewReducer.js +2 -1
- package/lib/view/auditReportView/auditReportViewReducer.js +2 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -730,9 +730,7 @@ const aiCfo = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
|
|
|
730
730
|
},
|
|
731
731
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
732
732
|
builder.addCase(rootActions_1.clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
733
|
-
draft.
|
|
734
|
-
draft.partialQuestionAnswers = {};
|
|
735
|
-
draft.syntheticAnswersByChatSessionId = {};
|
|
733
|
+
Object.assign(draft, exports.initialAiCfoState);
|
|
736
734
|
});
|
|
737
735
|
},
|
|
738
736
|
});
|
|
@@ -202,7 +202,10 @@ const company = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
|
|
|
202
202
|
},
|
|
203
203
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
204
204
|
builder.addCase(rootActions_1.clearAll, (draft, action) => {
|
|
205
|
-
|
|
205
|
+
// `=== false` rather than `!`: the flag is required at the type level, but an
|
|
206
|
+
// untyped or stale-build caller doing `clearAll()` would send `undefined`,
|
|
207
|
+
// and defaulting that to "wipe" is the dangerous direction. Keep is safe.
|
|
208
|
+
if (action.payload.keepTenantCompanyState === false) {
|
|
206
209
|
Object.assign(draft, exports.initialState);
|
|
207
210
|
}
|
|
208
211
|
});
|
|
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ const depositAccount = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
|
|
|
33
33
|
},
|
|
34
34
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
35
35
|
builder.addCase(rootActions_1.clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
36
|
+
// Full reset rather than mirroring clearAllDepositAccounts, which leaves
|
|
37
|
+
// depositAccountLimitForChargeCardByID holding the previous tenant's limits.
|
|
38
|
+
Object.assign(draft, exports.initialState);
|
|
37
39
|
});
|
|
38
40
|
},
|
|
39
41
|
});
|
|
@@ -921,7 +921,10 @@ const tenant = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
|
|
|
921
921
|
},
|
|
922
922
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
923
923
|
builder.addCase(rootActions_1.clearAll, (draft, action) => {
|
|
924
|
-
|
|
924
|
+
// `=== false` rather than `!`: the flag is required at the type level, but an
|
|
925
|
+
// untyped or stale-build caller doing `clearAll()` would send `undefined`,
|
|
926
|
+
// and defaulting that to "wipe" is the dangerous direction. Keep is safe.
|
|
927
|
+
if (action.payload.keepTenantCompanyState === false) {
|
|
925
928
|
Object.assign(draft, exports.initialState);
|
|
926
929
|
}
|
|
927
930
|
});
|
|
@@ -135,8 +135,9 @@ const transaction = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
|
|
|
135
135
|
},
|
|
136
136
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
137
137
|
builder.addCase(rootActions_1.clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
138
|
-
|
|
139
|
-
|
|
138
|
+
// Full reset rather than mirroring clearAllTransactions, which leaves
|
|
139
|
+
// reconcileTransactionById holding the previous tenant's rows.
|
|
140
|
+
Object.assign(draft, exports.initialState);
|
|
140
141
|
});
|
|
141
142
|
},
|
|
142
143
|
});
|
|
@@ -62,7 +62,9 @@ const vendor = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
|
|
|
62
62
|
},
|
|
63
63
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
64
64
|
builder.addCase(rootActions_1.clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
65
|
+
// Full reset rather than mirroring clearAllVendorExpenseTrends, which leaves
|
|
66
|
+
// `spend` holding the previous tenant's totals.
|
|
67
|
+
Object.assign(draft, exports.initialState);
|
|
66
68
|
});
|
|
67
69
|
},
|
|
68
70
|
});
|
|
@@ -725,9 +725,7 @@ const aiCfo = createSlice({
|
|
|
725
725
|
},
|
|
726
726
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
727
727
|
builder.addCase(clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
728
|
-
draft
|
|
729
|
-
draft.partialQuestionAnswers = {};
|
|
730
|
-
draft.syntheticAnswersByChatSessionId = {};
|
|
728
|
+
Object.assign(draft, initialAiCfoState);
|
|
731
729
|
});
|
|
732
730
|
},
|
|
733
731
|
});
|
|
@@ -195,7 +195,10 @@ const company = createSlice({
|
|
|
195
195
|
},
|
|
196
196
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
197
197
|
builder.addCase(clearAll, (draft, action) => {
|
|
198
|
-
|
|
198
|
+
// `=== false` rather than `!`: the flag is required at the type level, but an
|
|
199
|
+
// untyped or stale-build caller doing `clearAll()` would send `undefined`,
|
|
200
|
+
// and defaulting that to "wipe" is the dangerous direction. Keep is safe.
|
|
201
|
+
if (action.payload.keepTenantCompanyState === false) {
|
|
199
202
|
Object.assign(draft, initialState);
|
|
200
203
|
}
|
|
201
204
|
});
|
|
@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ const depositAccount = createSlice({
|
|
|
29
29
|
},
|
|
30
30
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
31
31
|
builder.addCase(clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
32
|
+
// Full reset rather than mirroring clearAllDepositAccounts, which leaves
|
|
33
|
+
// depositAccountLimitForChargeCardByID holding the previous tenant's limits.
|
|
34
|
+
Object.assign(draft, initialState);
|
|
33
35
|
});
|
|
34
36
|
},
|
|
35
37
|
});
|
|
@@ -909,7 +909,10 @@ const tenant = createSlice({
|
|
|
909
909
|
},
|
|
910
910
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
911
911
|
builder.addCase(clearAll, (draft, action) => {
|
|
912
|
-
|
|
912
|
+
// `=== false` rather than `!`: the flag is required at the type level, but an
|
|
913
|
+
// untyped or stale-build caller doing `clearAll()` would send `undefined`,
|
|
914
|
+
// and defaulting that to "wipe" is the dangerous direction. Keep is safe.
|
|
915
|
+
if (action.payload.keepTenantCompanyState === false) {
|
|
913
916
|
Object.assign(draft, initialState);
|
|
914
917
|
}
|
|
915
918
|
});
|
|
@@ -128,8 +128,9 @@ const transaction = createSlice({
|
|
|
128
128
|
},
|
|
129
129
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
130
130
|
builder.addCase(clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
131
|
-
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
131
|
+
// Full reset rather than mirroring clearAllTransactions, which leaves
|
|
132
|
+
// reconcileTransactionById holding the previous tenant's rows.
|
|
133
|
+
Object.assign(draft, initialState);
|
|
133
134
|
});
|
|
134
135
|
},
|
|
135
136
|
});
|
|
@@ -58,7 +58,9 @@ const vendor = createSlice({
|
|
|
58
58
|
},
|
|
59
59
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
60
60
|
builder.addCase(clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
61
|
+
// Full reset rather than mirroring clearAllVendorExpenseTrends, which leaves
|
|
62
|
+
// `spend` holding the previous tenant's totals.
|
|
63
|
+
Object.assign(draft, initialState);
|
|
62
64
|
});
|
|
63
65
|
},
|
|
64
66
|
});
|
|
@@ -200,8 +200,9 @@ const auditReportView = createSlice({
|
|
|
200
200
|
},
|
|
201
201
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
202
202
|
builder.addCase(clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
203
|
+
// Covers auditRuleGroupView too — clearAuditRuleGroupView only exists to
|
|
204
|
+
// reset that sub-object on its own.
|
|
203
205
|
Object.assign(draft, initialState);
|
|
204
|
-
draft.auditRuleGroupView = Object.assign(draft.auditRuleGroupView, initialState.auditRuleGroupView);
|
|
205
206
|
});
|
|
206
207
|
},
|
|
207
208
|
});
|
|
@@ -204,8 +204,9 @@ const auditReportView = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
|
|
|
204
204
|
},
|
|
205
205
|
extraReducers: (builder) => {
|
|
206
206
|
builder.addCase(rootActions_1.clearAll, (draft) => {
|
|
207
|
+
// Covers auditRuleGroupView too — clearAuditRuleGroupView only exists to
|
|
208
|
+
// reset that sub-object on its own.
|
|
207
209
|
Object.assign(draft, exports.initialState);
|
|
208
|
-
draft.auditRuleGroupView = Object.assign(draft.auditRuleGroupView, exports.initialState.auditRuleGroupView);
|
|
209
210
|
});
|
|
210
211
|
},
|
|
211
212
|
});
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@zeniai/client-epic-state",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "5.1.85
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "5.1.85",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Shared module between Web & Mobile containing required abstractions for state management, async network communication. ",
|
|
5
5
|
"main": "lib/index.js",
|
|
6
6
|
"module": "lib/esm/index.js",
|