@zeniai/client-epic-state 5.0.90-betaAR5 → 5.0.90-betaAR6

package/lib/view/spendManagement/billPay/billPaySetupApproverView/types/commonState.d.ts

@@ -1,45 +1,19 @@
 import { FetchStateAndError, ID } from '../../../../../commonStateTypes/common';
-import { AmountCriteria, DepartmentCriteria, Step, VendorCriteria } from '../../../../../entity/approvalRule/approvalRuleState';
+import { Criteria, Step } from '../../../../../entity/approvalRule/approvalRuleState';
 export type ApprovalUpdateActionType = 'approval_create' | 'approval_update';
 export interface ApproverViewUpdateData {
     type: ApprovalUpdateActionType;
     updateStatus: FetchStateAndError;
     data?: ApprovalRuleUpdateData | ApprovalRuleCreateData;
 }
-/**
- * Form-side criteria shape used by the rule create/edit form.
- *
- * Each condition kind gets its own optional slot, mirroring how the UI
- * edits them as distinct rows. At most one of each kind is present; this
- * matches the design constraint that each condition type can be added once.
- */
-export interface ApprovalRuleFormCriteria {
-    amount?: AmountCriteria;
-    department?: DepartmentCriteria;
-    vendor?: VendorCriteria;
-}
-/**
- * Rule-level fields shared by both create and update flows.
- *
- * These come from the 3.0 design: the form now owns a name, an optional
- * description, an optional Separation-of-Duties toggle, and a flag that
- * marks the rule as the org-wide fallback rule. They live alongside
- * criteria/steps but are not part of either.
- */
-export interface ApprovalRuleFormBase {
-    description?: string;
-    isFallback?: boolean;
-    name?: string;
-    separationOfDuties?: boolean;
-}
-export interface ApprovalRuleUpdateData extends ApprovalRuleFormBase {
+export interface ApprovalRuleUpdateData {
     approvalRuleId: ID;
-    criteria: ApprovalRuleFormCriteria;
+    criteria: Criteria;
     steps: Step[];
     isApplicableOnPendingApprovalEntity?: boolean;
 }
-export interface ApprovalRuleCreateData extends ApprovalRuleFormBase {
-    criteria: ApprovalRuleFormCriteria;
+export interface ApprovalRuleCreateData {
+    criteria: Criteria;
     steps: Step[];
     isApplicableOnPendingApprovalEntity?: boolean;
 }

package/lib/view/spendManagement/billPay/editBillView/editBillViewSelector.d.ts

@@ -100,13 +100,6 @@ export interface EditBillDetailSelectorView extends SelectorView {
     withdrawFromList: FundingAccount[];
     billPayInfo?: BillPayInfo;
     bookCloseDate?: ZeniDate;
-    /**
-     * Bill-level accounting class id. Approval Rules 3.0 'department'
-     * criteria match against this — selectors needing to evaluate a
-     * department-narrowed rule against the current bill should read
-     * this rather than digging through 'state.billTransactionState'.
-     */
-    classId?: ID;
     createTime?: ZeniDate;
     editBillInitialDetails?: EditBillInitialDetails;
     internationalWireOnboardingStatus?: AllowedValueWithCode;
@@ -164,4 +157,4 @@ export declare const getDefaultWithdrawFromAccount: (state: RootState, depositAc
     accountId: ID;
     accountType: AccountTypeSubConfigCodeKeyType;
 }) => FundingAccount | undefined;
-export declare const checkIfCreatorIsApprover: (billAmount: number, approvalRules: ApprovalRuleWithUser[], signedInUser?: LoggedInUser, billVendorId?: ID, billDepartmentId?: ID) => boolean;
+export declare const checkIfCreatorIsApprover: (billAmount: number, approvalRules: ApprovalRuleWithUser[], signedInUser?: LoggedInUser) => boolean;

package/lib/view/spendManagement/billPay/editBillView/editBillViewSelector.js

@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ exports.getPaymentSection = getPaymentSection;
 exports.toPaymentToOption = toPaymentToOption;
 const get_1 = __importDefault(require("lodash/get"));
 const has_1 = __importDefault(require("lodash/has"));
-const approvalRuleSelector_1 = require("../../../../entity/approvalRule/approvalRuleSelector");
 const reduceFetchState_1 = require("../../../../commonStateTypes/reduceFetchState");
 const bankAccountSelector_1 = require("../../../../entity/bankAccount/bankAccountSelector");
 const contactSelector_1 = require("../../../../entity/billPay/contact/contactSelector");
@@ -366,14 +365,6 @@ const getEditBillDetail = (state, isVendorRecommendationFeatureEnabled, isZeniAc
         isDeleted,
         showAutofill,
         addBillAutoFields,
-        // Bill-level accounting class. Approval Rules 3.0 'department'
-        // criteria match against this. Lives on BillTransaction; not on
-        // any sub-section. Empty-string is normalised to 'undefined'
-        // so downstream readers treat "no class" uniformly regardless
-        // of whether the wire used '' or omitted the field.
-        classId: transaction?.classId != null && transaction.classId !== ''
-            ? transaction.classId
-            : undefined,
         billStage,
         deleteStatus,
         billActivities,
@@ -704,59 +695,12 @@ const getDefaultWithdrawFromAccount = (state, depositAccounts, companyId, lastSe
     return undefined;
 };
 exports.getDefaultWithdrawFromAccount = getDefaultWithdrawFromAccount;
-const checkIfCreatorIsApprover = (billAmount, approvalRules, signedInUser, billVendorId, billDepartmentId) => {
+const checkIfCreatorIsApprover = (billAmount, approvalRules, signedInUser) => {
     let isCreatorAlsoApprover = false;
-    // Approval Rules 3.0 — a rule applies to a bill only when all of
-    // its present criteria are satisfied. Criteria not declared on
-    // the rule are treated as "no narrowing on this axis".
-    //
-    // Strict-match semantics for vendor / department: if the rule
-    // narrows by an axis but the bill has no value on that axis, the
-    // rule does NOT apply (an absent bill-side value can't satisfy
-    // either 'is' or 'is_not'). Amount is always present on a rule
-    // (the form enforces this), but bounds may be one-sided.
     const approvalRule = approvalRules.find((rule) => {
-        const vendorCriteria = (0, approvalRuleSelector_1.getVendorCriteria)(rule.criteria);
-        if (vendorCriteria != null) {
-            if (billVendorId == null) {
-                return false;
-            }
-            const includesVendor = vendorCriteria.vendorIds.includes(billVendorId);
-            if (vendorCriteria.operator === 'is' && !includesVendor) {
-                return false;
-            }
-            if (vendorCriteria.operator === 'is_not' && includesVendor) {
-                return false;
-            }
-        }
-        const departmentCriteria = (0, approvalRuleSelector_1.getDepartmentCriteria)(rule.criteria);
-        if (departmentCriteria != null) {
-            if (billDepartmentId == null) {
-                return false;
-            }
-            const includesDepartment = departmentCriteria.departmentIds.includes(billDepartmentId);
-            if (departmentCriteria.operator === 'is' && !includesDepartment) {
-                return false;
-            }
-            if (departmentCriteria.operator === 'is_not' && includesDepartment) {
-                return false;
-            }
-        }
-        const amountCriteria = (0, approvalRuleSelector_1.getAmountCriteria)(rule.criteria);
-        if (amountCriteria == null) {
-            // The form guarantees an amount criterion on every rule, so
-            // this branch is defensive against backend drift. Keep
-            // pre-3.0 behaviour: a rule that doesn't declare amount
-            // doesn't participate here.
-            return false;
-        }
-        // Bounds use the wire's inclusive 'gte' / 'lte' semantics, and
-        // either side may be absent for a one-sided 'greater_than' /
-        // 'less_than' rule.
-        const { min, max } = amountCriteria;
-        const matchesMin = min == null || billAmount >= min.amount;
-        const matchesMax = max == null || billAmount <= max.amount;
-        return matchesMin && matchesMax;
+        const { max, min } = rule.criteria[0].range;
+        return (billAmount > min.amount &&
+            (max?.amount != null ? billAmount <= max?.amount : true));
     });
     if (approvalRule != null) {
         const requireApprovalSteps = approvalRule.steps.filter((step) => step.action === 'require_approval');

package/lib/view/spendManagement/billPay/editBillView/epics/fetchEditBillDetailPageEpic.js

@@ -41,10 +41,7 @@ const fetchEditBillDetailPageEpic = (actions$, state$) => actions$.pipe((0, oper
         else {
             billDetailActions.push((0, editBillViewReducer_1.updateShowAutofill)(true));
         }
-        // Side-fetch from the edit-bill page bootstrap. The triggering
-        // action doesn't carry the V3 flag, so we explicitly target v1
-        // here; tenants on v3 re-fetch through their own screen connector.
-        billDetailActions.push((0, billPaySetupApproverViewReducer_1.fetchBillPaySetupApproverView)(true, true, false));
+        billDetailActions.push((0, billPaySetupApproverViewReducer_1.fetchBillPaySetupApproverView)(true));
     }
     else {
         if (state.ownerListState.fetchState !== 'In-Progress' &&
@@ -87,10 +84,7 @@ const fetchEditBillDetailPageEpic = (actions$, state$) => actions$.pipe((0, oper
         // While opening New Bill Refresh Approval Rules and Payment Accounts
         if (approvalViewFetchState !== 'In-Progress' &&
             approvalViewFetchState !== 'Completed') {
-            // Side-fetch from the edit-bill page bootstrap. The triggering
-            // action doesn't carry the V3 flag, so we explicitly target v1
-            // here; tenants on v3 re-fetch through their own screen connector.
-            billDetailActions.push((0, billPaySetupApproverViewReducer_1.fetchBillPaySetupApproverView)(true, true, false));
+            billDetailActions.push((0, billPaySetupApproverViewReducer_1.fetchBillPaySetupApproverView)(true));
         }
     }
     return (0, rxjs_1.concat)((0, rxjs_1.from)(billDetailActions));

package/lib/view/spendManagement/chargeCards/chargeCardList/chargeCardList.d.ts

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ export declare const initialCreditAcc: CreditAccount;
 export declare const initialDebitCardSummaries: DebitCardSummaries;
 export declare const initialResendRevokeCardInvite: ResendRevokeCardInvite;
 export declare const initialCreditAccountRepayment: CreditAccountRepayment;
-export declare const toChargeCardSortKeyType: (v: string) => "status" | "department" | "accountType" | "owner" | "cardName" | "limit" | "cardType" | "utilisation";
+export declare const toChargeCardSortKeyType: (v: string) => "status" | "accountType" | "owner" | "cardName" | "limit" | "department" | "cardType" | "utilisation";
 export declare type ChargeCardViewSortKey = ReturnType<typeof toChargeCardSortKeyType>;
 export declare const ALL_CASHBACK_SORT_KEYS: readonly ["month", "cashback"];
 export declare const toCashbackSortKeyType: (v: string) => "month" | "cashback";

package/lib/view/spendManagement/reimbursement/editRemiView/epics/fetchEditRemiDetailPageEpic.js

@@ -66,11 +66,7 @@ const fetchEditRemiDetailPageEpic = (actions$, state$) => actions$.pipe((0, oper
             const approvalRules = state.remiSetupApproverViewState;
             if (approvalRules.fetchState !== 'Completed' &&
                 approvalRules.fetchState !== 'In-Progress') {
-                // Side-fetch from the edit-reim page bootstrap. The
-                // triggering action doesn't carry the V3 flag, so we
-                // explicitly target v1; v3 tenants re-fetch via their
-                // own screen connector.
-                remiDetailActions.push((0, remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.fetchRemiSetupApproverView)(true, false, false, false));
+                remiDetailActions.push((0, remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.fetchRemiSetupApproverView)(true));
             }
         }
     }

package/lib/view/spendManagement/reimbursement/remiSetupApproverView/epic/deleteRemiApprovalRuleEpic.js

@@ -9,17 +9,9 @@ const userReducer_1 = require("../../../../../entity/user/userReducer");
 const responsePayload_1 = require("../../../../../responsePayload");
 const remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1 = require("../remiSetupApproverViewReducer");
 const deleteRemiApprovalRuleEpic = (actions$, _state$, zeniAPI) => actions$.pipe((0, operators_1.filter)(remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.deleteRemiApprovalRule.match), (0, operators_1.switchMap)((action) => {
-    const { approvalRuleId, useV3 } = action.payload;
-    // Approval Rules 3.0 — flag-gated endpoint selection.
-    // Explicit `=== true` keeps `strict-boolean-expressions` happy
-    // when RTK's payload type widens to `any` in some configs.
-    const endpoint = useV3 === true
-        ? `${zeniAPI.apiEndPoints.approvalMicroServiceBaseUrl}/1.0/reimbursements/approval-rules-v2`
-        : `${zeniAPI.apiEndPoints.approvalMicroServiceBaseUrl}/1.0/reimbursements/approval-rules`;
+    const { approvalRuleId } = action.payload;
     return zeniAPI
-        .deleteAndGetJSON(endpoint, {
-        approval_rule_id: approvalRuleId,
-    })
+        .deleteAndGetJSON(`${zeniAPI.apiEndPoints.approvalMicroServiceBaseUrl}/1.0/reimbursements/approval-rules`, { approval_rule_id: approvalRuleId })
         .pipe((0, operators_1.mergeMap)((response) => {
         if ((0, responsePayload_1.isSuccessResponse)(response) && response.data != null) {
             const approvalRuleIds = response.data.approval_rules.map((approvalRule) => approvalRule.approval_rule_id);

package/lib/view/spendManagement/reimbursement/remiSetupApproverView/epic/fetchRemiSetupApproverViewEpic.js

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ const userReducer_1 = require("../../../../../entity/user/userReducer");
 const responsePayload_1 = require("../../../../../responsePayload");
 const remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1 = require("../remiSetupApproverViewReducer");
 const fetchRemiSetupApproverViewEpic = (actions$, state$, zeniAPI) => actions$.pipe((0, operators_1.filter)(remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.fetchRemiSetupApproverView.match), (0, operators_1.switchMap)((action) => {
-    const { cacheOverride, resolveAttributeToUser, includeImplicitActors, useV3, } = action.payload;
+    const { cacheOverride, resolveAttributeToUser, includeImplicitActors } = action.payload;
     const { remiSetupApproverViewState, approvalRuleState } = state$.value;
     const approvalRules = (0, approvalRuleSelector_1.getApprovalRulesByIds)(approvalRuleState, remiSetupApproverViewState.approvalRuleIds);
     if (cacheOverride === true ||
@@ -17,14 +17,8 @@ const fetchRemiSetupApproverViewEpic = (actions$, state$, zeniAPI) => actions$.p
             remiSetupApproverViewState.approvalRuleIds.length ||
         (remiSetupApproverViewState.hasValidState() === false &&
             remiSetupApproverViewState.fetchState !== 'In-Progress')) {
-        // Approval Rules 3.0 — flag-gated endpoint selection.
-        // Explicit `=== true` keeps `strict-boolean-expressions` happy
-        // when RTK's payload type widens to `any` in some configs.
-        const basePath = useV3 === true
-            ? `${zeniAPI.apiEndPoints.approvalMicroServiceBaseUrl}/1.0/reimbursements/approval-rules-v2`
-            : `${zeniAPI.apiEndPoints.approvalMicroServiceBaseUrl}/1.0/reimbursements/approval-rules`;
         return zeniAPI
-            .getJSON(`${basePath}?query={"is_include_implicit_actors": ${includeImplicitActors}, "is_resolve_attribute_to_user":${resolveAttributeToUser}}`)
+            .getJSON(`${zeniAPI.apiEndPoints.approvalMicroServiceBaseUrl}/1.0/reimbursements/approval-rules?query={"is_include_implicit_actors": ${includeImplicitActors}, "is_resolve_attribute_to_user":${resolveAttributeToUser}}`)
             .pipe((0, operators_1.mergeMap)((response) => {
             if ((0, responsePayload_1.isSuccessResponse)(response) && response.data != null) {
                 const approvalRuleIds = response.data.approval_rules.map((approvalRule) => approvalRule.approval_rule_id);

package/lib/view/spendManagement/reimbursement/remiSetupApproverView/epic/initializeRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateDataEpic.js

@@ -11,20 +11,16 @@ const initializeRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateDataEpic = (actions$, state$) => acti
     if (approvalRuleId != null) {
         const approvalRule = (0, approvalRuleSelector_1.getApprovalRuleById)(state$.value.approvalRuleState, approvalRuleId);
         if (approvalRule != null) {
+            const criteria = approvalRule.criteria[0];
+            const range = criteria?.range;
             const remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = {
                 approvalRuleId,
                 steps: approvalRule.steps,
                 criteria: {
-                    amount: (0, approvalRuleSelector_1.getAmountCriteria)(approvalRule.criteria),
-                    vendor: (0, approvalRuleSelector_1.getVendorCriteria)(approvalRule.criteria),
-                    department: (0, approvalRuleSelector_1.getDepartmentCriteria)(approvalRule.criteria),
+                    rangeType: criteria?.rangeType,
+                    rangeEntity: criteria?.rangeEntity,
+                    range,
                 },
-                // Approval Rules 3.0 — seed rule-level fields so the form can
-                // round-trip them on edit. Each may be undefined on legacy rules.
-                name: approvalRule.name,
-                description: approvalRule.description,
-                separationOfDuties: approvalRule.separationOfDuties,
-                isFallback: approvalRule.isFallback,
             };
             fetchActions.push((0, remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.clearRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData)(), (0, remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData)(remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData));
         }
@@ -32,7 +28,7 @@ const initializeRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateDataEpic = (actions$, state$) => acti
     else {
         const remiSetupApproverViewCreateData = {
             steps: [],
-            criteria: {},
+            criteria: undefined,
         };
         fetchActions.push((0, remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.clearRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData)(), (0, remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData)(remiSetupApproverViewCreateData));
     }

package/lib/view/spendManagement/reimbursement/remiSetupApproverView/epic/saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesEpic.js

@@ -9,23 +9,14 @@ const userReducer_1 = require("../../../../../entity/user/userReducer");
 const responsePayload_1 = require("../../../../../responsePayload");
 const commonPayload_1 = require("../../../billPay/billPaySetupApproverView/types/commonPayload");
 const remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1 = require("../remiSetupApproverViewReducer");
-const saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesEpic = (actions$, state$, zeniAPI) => actions$.pipe((0, operators_1.filter)(remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates.match), (0, operators_1.switchMap)((action) => {
+const saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesEpic = (actions$, state$, zeniAPI) => actions$.pipe((0, operators_1.filter)(remiSetupApproverViewReducer_1.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates.match), (0, operators_1.switchMap)(() => {
     const { remiSetupApproverViewState } = state$.value;
     const remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = remiSetupApproverViewState.remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData;
     if (remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData != null &&
         remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData.data != null) {
-        // Approval Rules 3.0 — gate URL + write-side payload mapper on
-        // the `approval_rule_v3_config` dynamic config. `useV3` arrives
-        // on the action payload from the screen connector.
-        const { useV3 } = action.payload;
-        const payload = useV3
-            ? (0, commonPayload_1.toApprovalChangableInfoPayload)(remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData.data)
-            : (0, commonPayload_1.toApprovalChangableInfoPayloadV1)(remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData.data);
-        const endpoint = useV3
-            ? `${zeniAPI.apiEndPoints.approvalMicroServiceBaseUrl}/1.0/reimbursements/approval-rules-v2`
-            : `${zeniAPI.apiEndPoints.approvalMicroServiceBaseUrl}/1.0/reimbursements/approval-rules`;
+        const payload = (0, commonPayload_1.toApprovalChangableInfoPayload)(remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData.data);
         return zeniAPI
-            .postAndGetJSON(endpoint, payload)
+            .postAndGetJSON(`${zeniAPI.apiEndPoints.approvalMicroServiceBaseUrl}/1.0/reimbursements/approval-rules`, payload)
             .pipe((0, operators_1.mergeMap)((response) => {
             if ((0, responsePayload_1.isSuccessResponse)(response) && response.data != null) {
                 const approvalRuleIds = response.data.approval_rules.map((approvalRule) => approvalRule.approval_rule_id);

package/lib/view/spendManagement/reimbursement/remiSetupApproverView/remiSetupApproverViewReducer.d.ts

@@ -2,11 +2,10 @@ import { ZeniAPIStatus } from '../../../../responsePayload';
 import { ApprovalRuleCreateData, ApprovalRuleUpdateData } from '../../billPay/billPaySetupApproverView/types/commonState';
 import { RemiSetupApproverViewState } from './remiSetupApproverViewState';
 export declare const initialState: RemiSetupApproverViewState;
-export declare const fetchRemiSetupApproverView: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[cacheOverride: any, resolveAttributeToUser: any, includeImplicitActors: any, useV3: boolean], {
+export declare const fetchRemiSetupApproverView: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[cacheOverride?: any, resolveAttributeToUser?: any, includeImplicitActors?: any], {
     cacheOverride: any;
     resolveAttributeToUser: any;
     includeImplicitActors: any;
-    useV3: boolean;
 }, "remiSetupApproverView/fetchRemiSetupApproverView", never, never>, fetchRemiSetupApproverViewSuccess: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[approvalRuleIds: string[]], {
     approvalRuleIds: string[];
 }, "remiSetupApproverView/fetchRemiSetupApproverViewSuccess", never, never>, fetchRemiSetupApproverViewFailure: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[status: ZeniAPIStatus<Record<string, unknown>>], ZeniAPIStatus<Record<string, unknown>>, "remiSetupApproverView/fetchRemiSetupApproverViewFailure", never, never>, fetchRemiApproversDetails: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[cacheOverride?: any, includeUserRoles?: any, includeAttributesUserIds?: any, lastUpdatedByUserId?: any], {
@@ -25,25 +24,15 @@ export declare const fetchRemiSetupApproverView: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").Acti
     attributeSubTypeToUserIdMapping: Record<"manager" | "vendor_owner" | "manager_of_manager", string> | undefined;
 }, "remiSetupApproverView/fetchRemiApproversListSuccess", never, never>, fetchRemiApproversListFailure: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[status: ZeniAPIStatus<Record<string, unknown>>], {
     status: ZeniAPIStatus<Record<string, unknown>>;
-}, "remiSetupApproverView/fetchRemiApproversListFailure", never, never>, deleteRemiApprovalRule: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[approvalRuleId: string, useV3: boolean], {
+}, "remiSetupApproverView/fetchRemiApproversListFailure", never, never>, deleteRemiApprovalRule: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[approvalRuleId: string], {
     approvalRuleId: string;
-    useV3: boolean;
 }, "remiSetupApproverView/deleteRemiApprovalRule", never, never>, deleteRemiApprovalRuleSuccess: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[deletedApprovalRuleId: string, approvalRuleIds: string[]], {
     deletedApprovalRuleId: string;
     approvalRuleIds: string[];
 }, "remiSetupApproverView/deleteRemiApprovalRuleSuccess", never, never>, deleteRemiApprovalRuleFailure: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[approvalRuleId: string, status: ZeniAPIStatus<Record<string, unknown>>], {
     approvalRuleId: string;
     status: ZeniAPIStatus<Record<string, unknown>>;
-}, "remiSetupApproverView/deleteRemiApprovalRuleFailure", never, never>, reorderRemiApprovalRules: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[approvalRuleIds: string[], useV3: boolean], {
-    approvalRuleIds: string[];
-    useV3: boolean;
-}, "remiSetupApproverView/reorderRemiApprovalRules", never, never>, reorderRemiApprovalRulesSuccess: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[approvalRuleIds: string[]], {
-    approvalRuleIds: string[];
-}, "remiSetupApproverView/reorderRemiApprovalRulesSuccess", never, never>, reorderRemiApprovalRulesFailure: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[status: ZeniAPIStatus<Record<string, unknown>>], {
-    status: ZeniAPIStatus<Record<string, unknown>>;
-}, "remiSetupApproverView/reorderRemiApprovalRulesFailure", never, never>, saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[useV3: boolean], {
-    useV3: boolean;
-}, "remiSetupApproverView/saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates", never, never>, saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesSuccess: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[approvalRuleIds: string[], affectedEntityIds?: string[] | undefined, newApprovalRuleId?: string | undefined], {
+}, "remiSetupApproverView/deleteRemiApprovalRuleFailure", never, never>, saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithoutPayload<"remiSetupApproverView/saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates">, saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesSuccess: import("@reduxjs/toolkit").ActionCreatorWithPreparedPayload<[approvalRuleIds: string[], affectedEntityIds?: string[] | undefined, newApprovalRuleId?: string | undefined], {
     approvalRuleIds: string[];
     affectedEntityIds: string[] | undefined;
     newApprovalRuleId: string | undefined;

package/lib/view/spendManagement/reimbursement/remiSetupApproverView/remiSetupApproverViewReducer.js

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 "use strict";
 var _a;
 Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
-exports.clearRemiSetupApproverView = exports.clearRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = exports.setListeningToPusherEvent = exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = exports.initializeRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesFailure = exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesSuccess = exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates = exports.reorderRemiApprovalRulesFailure = exports.reorderRemiApprovalRulesSuccess = exports.reorderRemiApprovalRules = exports.deleteRemiApprovalRuleFailure = exports.deleteRemiApprovalRuleSuccess = exports.deleteRemiApprovalRule = exports.fetchRemiApproversListFailure = exports.fetchRemiApproversListSuccess = exports.fetchRemiApproversList = exports.fetchRemiApproversDetails = exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewFailure = exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewSuccess = exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverView = exports.initialState = void 0;
+exports.clearRemiSetupApproverView = exports.clearRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = exports.setListeningToPusherEvent = exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = exports.initializeRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesFailure = exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesSuccess = exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates = exports.deleteRemiApprovalRuleFailure = exports.deleteRemiApprovalRuleSuccess = exports.deleteRemiApprovalRule = exports.fetchRemiApproversListFailure = exports.fetchRemiApproversListSuccess = exports.fetchRemiApproversList = exports.fetchRemiApproversDetails = exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewFailure = exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewSuccess = exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverView = exports.initialState = void 0;
 const toolkit_1 = require("@reduxjs/toolkit");
 exports.initialState = {
     fetchState: 'Not-Started',
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ exports.initialState = {
     newApprovalRuleId: undefined,
     approvalRulesDeleteStatusById: {},
     remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData: undefined,
-    reorderStatus: { fetchState: 'Not-Started', error: undefined },
     hasValidState() {
         return this.fetchState === 'Completed';
     },
@@ -31,17 +30,12 @@ const remiSetupApproverView = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
                 draft.fetchState = 'In-Progress';
                 draft.error = undefined;
             },
-            // Approval Rules 3.0 — `useV3` arrives from the screen connector
-            // ('approval_rule_v3_config' dynamic config) and picks v1 vs v2
-            // endpoint in the fetch epic. Required (no default) so a missing
-            // connector wire surfaces at compile time.
-            prepare(cacheOverride = false, resolveAttributeToUser = false, includeImplicitActors = false, useV3) {
+            prepare(cacheOverride = false, resolveAttributeToUser = false, includeImplicitActors = false) {
                 return {
                     payload: {
                         cacheOverride,
                         resolveAttributeToUser,
                         includeImplicitActors,
-                        useV3,
                     },
                 };
             },
@@ -144,12 +138,8 @@ const remiSetupApproverView = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
                     error: undefined,
                 };
             },
-            // Approval Rules 3.0 — `useV3` flows from the screen connector
-            // ('approval_rule_v3_config' dynamic config) so the delete epic
-            // can pick the v1 vs v2 endpoint. Required (no default) so a
-            // missing connector wire surfaces at compile time.
-            prepare(approvalRuleId, useV3) {
-                return { payload: { approvalRuleId, useV3 } };
+            prepare(approvalRuleId) {
+                return { payload: { approvalRuleId } };
             },
         },
         deleteRemiApprovalRuleSuccess: {
@@ -181,72 +171,13 @@ const remiSetupApproverView = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
                 };
             },
         },
-        /**
-         * Approval Rules 3.0 — list-page drag-and-drop reorder.
-         * See BillPay equivalent for the longer rationale.
-         */
-        reorderRemiApprovalRules: {
-            reducer(draft, action) {
-                const { approvalRuleIds } = action.payload;
-                const wasReorderInFlight = draft.reorderStatus.fetchState === 'In-Progress';
-                draft.reorderStatus = { fetchState: 'In-Progress', error: undefined };
-                // Stash the pre-reorder order for synchronous rollback on
-                // 'Failure'. See the BillPay reducer for the rationale,
-                // including the in-flight guard: a second drag before the
-                // first PUT lands must not overwrite the snapshot.
-                if (!wasReorderInFlight) {
-                    draft.reorderRollbackIds = draft.approvalRuleIds;
-                }
-                draft.approvalRuleIds = approvalRuleIds;
-            },
-            // Approval Rules 3.0 — `useV3` required so a missing wire
-            // surfaces at compile time. Mirror of BillPay's reorder.prepare.
-            prepare(approvalRuleIds, useV3) {
-                return { payload: { approvalRuleIds, useV3 } };
-            },
-        },
-        reorderRemiApprovalRulesSuccess: {
-            reducer(draft, action) {
-                const { approvalRuleIds } = action.payload;
-                draft.reorderStatus = { fetchState: 'Completed', error: undefined };
-                draft.approvalRuleIds = approvalRuleIds;
-                draft.reorderRollbackIds = undefined;
-            },
-            prepare(approvalRuleIds) {
-                return { payload: { approvalRuleIds } };
-            },
-        },
-        reorderRemiApprovalRulesFailure: {
-            reducer(draft, action) {
-                const { status } = action.payload;
-                draft.reorderStatus = { fetchState: 'Error', error: status };
-                if (draft.reorderRollbackIds != null) {
-                    draft.approvalRuleIds = draft.reorderRollbackIds;
-                    draft.reorderRollbackIds = undefined;
-                }
-            },
-            prepare(status) {
-                return { payload: { status } };
-            },
-        },
-        saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates: {
-            // Approval Rules 3.0 — `useV3` sourced from
-            // `approval_rule_v3_config` dynamic config in the screen
-            // connector; epic uses it to pick v1 vs v2 URL + mapper. The
-            // reducer doesn't read the action but the parameter must be
-            // declared so the action payload type carries downstream.
-            // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars
-            reducer(draft, _action) {
-                if (draft.remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData != null) {
-                    draft.remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData.updateStatus = {
-                        fetchState: 'In-Progress',
-                        error: undefined,
-                    };
-                }
-            },
-            prepare(useV3) {
-                return { payload: { useV3 } };
-            },
+        saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates(draft) {
+            if (draft.remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData != null) {
+                draft.remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData.updateStatus = {
+                    fetchState: 'In-Progress',
+                    error: undefined,
+                };
+            }
         },
         saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesSuccess: {
             reducer(draft, action) {
@@ -335,5 +266,5 @@ const remiSetupApproverView = (0, toolkit_1.createSlice)({
         },
     },
 });
-_a = remiSetupApproverView.actions, exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverView = _a.fetchRemiSetupApproverView, exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewSuccess = _a.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewSuccess, exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewFailure = _a.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewFailure, exports.fetchRemiApproversDetails = _a.fetchRemiApproversDetails, exports.fetchRemiApproversList = _a.fetchRemiApproversList, exports.fetchRemiApproversListSuccess = _a.fetchRemiApproversListSuccess, exports.fetchRemiApproversListFailure = _a.fetchRemiApproversListFailure, exports.deleteRemiApprovalRule = _a.deleteRemiApprovalRule, exports.deleteRemiApprovalRuleSuccess = _a.deleteRemiApprovalRuleSuccess, exports.deleteRemiApprovalRuleFailure = _a.deleteRemiApprovalRuleFailure, exports.reorderRemiApprovalRules = _a.reorderRemiApprovalRules, exports.reorderRemiApprovalRulesSuccess = _a.reorderRemiApprovalRulesSuccess, exports.reorderRemiApprovalRulesFailure = _a.reorderRemiApprovalRulesFailure, exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates = _a.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates, exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesSuccess = _a.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesSuccess, exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesFailure = _a.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesFailure, exports.initializeRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = _a.initializeRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData, exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = _a.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData, exports.setListeningToPusherEvent = _a.setListeningToPusherEvent, exports.clearRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = _a.clearRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData, exports.clearRemiSetupApproverView = _a.clearRemiSetupApproverView;
+_a = remiSetupApproverView.actions, exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverView = _a.fetchRemiSetupApproverView, exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewSuccess = _a.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewSuccess, exports.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewFailure = _a.fetchRemiSetupApproverViewFailure, exports.fetchRemiApproversDetails = _a.fetchRemiApproversDetails, exports.fetchRemiApproversList = _a.fetchRemiApproversList, exports.fetchRemiApproversListSuccess = _a.fetchRemiApproversListSuccess, exports.fetchRemiApproversListFailure = _a.fetchRemiApproversListFailure, exports.deleteRemiApprovalRule = _a.deleteRemiApprovalRule, exports.deleteRemiApprovalRuleSuccess = _a.deleteRemiApprovalRuleSuccess, exports.deleteRemiApprovalRuleFailure = _a.deleteRemiApprovalRuleFailure, exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates = _a.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdates, exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesSuccess = _a.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesSuccess, exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesFailure = _a.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdatesFailure, exports.initializeRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = _a.initializeRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData, exports.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = _a.saveRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData, exports.setListeningToPusherEvent = _a.setListeningToPusherEvent, exports.clearRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData = _a.clearRemiSetupApproverViewUpdateData, exports.clearRemiSetupApproverView = _a.clearRemiSetupApproverView;
 exports.default = remiSetupApproverView.reducer;

package/lib/view/spendManagement/reimbursement/remiSetupApproverView/remiSetupApproverViewState.d.ts

@@ -10,20 +10,8 @@ export interface RemiSetupApproverViewState extends FetchedState {
         fetchStatus: FetchStateAndError;
         attributeSubTypeToUserIdMapping?: Record<AttributeType, ID>;
     };
-    /**
-     * List-page reorder PUT status. See BillPay equivalent for the
-     * longer rationale.
-     */
-    reorderStatus: FetchStateAndError;
     affectedEntityIds?: ID[];
     listeningToPusherEvent?: boolean;
     newApprovalRuleId?: ID;
     remiSetupApproverViewUpdateData?: ApproverViewUpdateData;
-    /**
-     * Pre-reorder snapshot of 'approvalRuleIds'. Stashed on the trigger
-     * reducer right before the optimistic mutation and consumed on
-     * Failure to restore the previous order without waiting for the
-     * epic's safety-net refetch. Cleared on Success.
-     */
-    reorderRollbackIds?: ID[];
 }

package/lib/view/taskManager/taskListView/taskList.d.ts

@@ -50,15 +50,15 @@ export interface TaskFilterCategory {
 }
 export type TaskListFilterCategoryField = 'status' | 'dueDate' | 'assignee' | 'creationDate' | 'priority' | 'tag';
 export declare const TASK_LIST_GROUP_BY_KEYS: readonly ["groupName", "status", "dueDate", "assignee", "priority", "tag"];
-export declare const toTaskListGroupByKeyType: (v: string) => "status" | "priority" | "dueDate" | "groupName" | "tag" | "assignee";
-export declare const toTaskListGroupByKeyTypeStrict: (v: string) => "status" | "priority" | "dueDate" | "groupName" | "tag" | "assignee" | undefined;
+export declare const toTaskListGroupByKeyType: (v: string) => "status" | "dueDate" | "groupName" | "tag" | "priority" | "assignee";
+export declare const toTaskListGroupByKeyTypeStrict: (v: string) => "status" | "dueDate" | "groupName" | "tag" | "priority" | "assignee" | undefined;
 export declare type TaskGroupKey = ReturnType<typeof toTaskListGroupByKeyType>;
 export interface TaskListUIState extends SpendManagementUIState {
     groupByKey: TaskGroupKey;
     searchText: string;
     sortKey: TaskListViewSortKey;
 }
-declare const toTaskListSortKeyType: (v: string) => "status" | "name" | "priority" | "dueDate" | "tag" | "timeSpent" | "assignee" | "creationDate" | "visibility";
+declare const toTaskListSortKeyType: (v: string) => "status" | "name" | "dueDate" | "tag" | "priority" | "timeSpent" | "assignee" | "creationDate" | "visibility";
 export declare type TaskListViewSortKey = ReturnType<typeof toTaskListSortKeyType>;
 export declare const TASK_LIST_FILTER_CATEGORIES: TaskListFilterCategoryOption[];
 interface TaskListFilterCategoryOption {

package/lib/view/transactionDetail/journalEntryLinesViewModel.d.ts

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import { JournalEntryTransactionLine, Line, TransactionLineBase } from '../../en
  * is testable and reusable.
  */
 export declare const JOURNAL_ENTRY_SORT_KEYS: readonly ["description", "name", "category", "class", "debit", "credit"];
-export declare const toJournalEntrySortKey: (v: string) => "description" | "name" | "category" | "class" | "credit" | "debit";
+export declare const toJournalEntrySortKey: (v: string) => "name" | "description" | "category" | "class" | "credit" | "debit";
 export type JournalEntrySortKey = ReturnType<typeof toJournalEntrySortKey>;
 export interface JournalEntryRowSortConfig {
     sortKey: JournalEntrySortKey;

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@zeniai/client-epic-state",
-  "version": "5.0.90-betaAR5",
+  "version": "5.0.90-betaAR6",
   "description": "Shared module between Web & Mobile containing required abstractions for state management, async network communication. ",
   "main": "lib/index.js",
   "module": "lib/esm/index.js",

package/lib/entity/approvalRule/approvalRuleConflict.d.ts

@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-import { ID } from '../../commonStateTypes/common';
-import { ApprovalRule, Criteria } from './approvalRuleState';
-/**
- * Approval Rules 3.0 — frontend overlap detection.
- *
- * Per product spec, two rules overlap iff:
- *   1. Their vendor criteria are exactly equal (same operator and
- *      the same set of vendor IDs, or both absent), AND
- *   2. Their department criteria are exactly equal (same shape), AND
- *   3. Their amount intervals intersect.
- *
- * The intuition: we only flag overlap when the non-amount criteria
- * are identical, because the typical mistake is "I tried to create a
- * second rule for the same vendor / department slice at a different
- * amount threshold and forgot the existing one". Subset / superset
- * overlaps (e.g. one rule has a department condition and the other
- * does not) are intentionally not flagged in this iteration.
- *
- * Amount intervals are:
- *   - greater_than(N)   → [N, +∞)
- *   - less_than(N)      → (-∞, N]
- *   - range(min, max)   → [min, max]
- *   - amount absent     → (-∞, +∞)
- *
- * Two intervals overlap iff max(lo) <= min(hi).
- *
- * Exclusions from the comparison pool:
- *   - The rule being edited (caller passes `excludeRuleId`).
- *   - Fallback rules — they are a separate concept (match-all-others)
- *     and not subject to the per-criteria overlap check.
- *
- * Callers should filter `existingRules` to the relevant entityType
- * (BillPay vs Reimbursement) before passing — the function does not
- * cross-check entityType.
- *
- * Pure function: no side effects, deterministic. Returns the list of
- * overlapping rules. Empty list means no overlap.
- */
-/**
- * Structural shape of a rule the algorithm needs. The detector only
- * reads `criteria`, `isFallback`, and `approvalRuleId`; it never
- * touches `steps`, so callers may pass any 'ApprovalRule' subtype
- * (e.g. `ApprovalRuleWithUser`) and we keep the richer type in the
- * output.
- */
-export type RuleForOverlapCheck = Pick<ApprovalRule, 'approvalRuleId' | 'criteria' | 'isFallback'>;
-export interface RuleOverlap<TRule extends RuleForOverlapCheck = ApprovalRule> {
-    conflictingRule: TRule;
-}
-export interface DetectRuleOverlapInput<TRule extends RuleForOverlapCheck = ApprovalRule> {
-    candidateCriteria: Criteria[];
-    existingRules: TRule[];
-    /** When editing an existing rule, exclude it from the comparison. */
-    excludeRuleId?: ID;
-}
-export declare function detectRuleOverlap<TRule extends RuleForOverlapCheck>({ candidateCriteria, existingRules, excludeRuleId, }: DetectRuleOverlapInput<TRule>): RuleOverlap<TRule>[];