@yeongjaeyou/claude-code-config 0.5.1 โ†’ 0.5.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,605 @@
1
+ # Implementation Plan: [Feature Name]
2
+
3
+ **Status**: ๐Ÿ”„ In Progress
4
+ **Started**: YYYY-MM-DD
5
+ **Last Updated**: YYYY-MM-DD
6
+ **Estimated Completion**: YYYY-MM-DD
7
+
8
+ ---
9
+
10
+ **โš ๏ธ CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: After completing each phase:
11
+ 1. โœ… Check off completed task checkboxes
12
+ 2. ๐Ÿงช Run all quality gate validation commands
13
+ 3. โš ๏ธ Verify ALL quality gate items pass
14
+ 4. ๐Ÿ“… Update "Last Updated" date above
15
+ 5. ๐Ÿ“ Document learnings in Notes section
16
+ 6. โžก๏ธ Only then proceed to next phase
17
+
18
+ โ›” **DO NOT skip quality gates or proceed with failing checks**
19
+
20
+ ---
21
+
22
+ ## ๐Ÿ“‹ Overview
23
+
24
+ ### Feature Description
25
+ [What this feature does and why it's needed]
26
+
27
+ ### Success Criteria
28
+ - [ ] Criterion 1
29
+ - [ ] Criterion 2
30
+ - [ ] Criterion 3
31
+
32
+ ### User Impact
33
+ [How this benefits users or improves the product]
34
+
35
+ ---
36
+
37
+ ## ๐Ÿ—๏ธ Architecture Decisions
38
+
39
+ | Decision | Rationale | Trade-offs |
40
+ |----------|-----------|------------|
41
+ | [Decision 1] | [Why this approach] | [What we're giving up] |
42
+ | [Decision 2] | [Why this approach] | [What we're giving up] |
43
+
44
+ ---
45
+
46
+ ## ๐Ÿ“ฆ Dependencies
47
+
48
+ ### Required Before Starting
49
+ - [ ] Dependency 1: [Description]
50
+ - [ ] Dependency 2: [Description]
51
+
52
+ ### External Dependencies
53
+ - Package/Library 1: version X.Y.Z
54
+ - Package/Library 2: version X.Y.Z
55
+
56
+ ---
57
+
58
+ ## ๐Ÿงช Test Strategy
59
+
60
+ ### Testing Approach
61
+ **TDD Principle**: Write tests FIRST, then implement to make them pass
62
+
63
+ ### Test Pyramid for This Feature
64
+ | Test Type | Coverage Target | Purpose |
65
+ |-----------|-----------------|---------|
66
+ | **Unit Tests** | โ‰ฅ80% | Business logic, models, core algorithms |
67
+ | **Integration Tests** | Critical paths | Component interactions, data flow |
68
+ | **E2E Tests** | Key user flows | Full system behavior validation |
69
+
70
+ ### Test File Organization
71
+ ```
72
+ test/
73
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ unit/
74
+ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€โ”€ [domain/business_logic]/
75
+ โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€ [data/models]/
76
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ integration/
77
+ โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€ [feature_name]/
78
+ โ””โ”€โ”€ e2e/
79
+ โ””โ”€โ”€ [user_flows]/
80
+ ```
81
+
82
+ ### Coverage Requirements by Phase
83
+ - **Phase 1 (Foundation)**: Unit tests for core models/entities (โ‰ฅ80%)
84
+ - **Phase 2 (Business Logic)**: Logic + repository tests (โ‰ฅ80%)
85
+ - **Phase 3 (Integration)**: Component integration tests (โ‰ฅ70%)
86
+ - **Phase 4 (E2E)**: End-to-end user flow test (1+ critical path)
87
+
88
+ ### Test Naming Convention
89
+ Follow your project's testing framework conventions:
90
+ ```
91
+ // Example structure (adapt to your framework):
92
+ describe/group: Feature or component name
93
+ test/it: Specific behavior being tested
94
+ // Arrange โ†’ Act โ†’ Assert pattern
95
+ ```
96
+
97
+ ---
98
+
99
+ ## ๐Ÿš€ Implementation Phases
100
+
101
+ ### Phase 1: [Foundation Phase Name]
102
+ **Goal**: [Specific working functionality this phase delivers]
103
+ **Estimated Time**: X hours
104
+ **Status**: โณ Pending | ๐Ÿ”„ In Progress | โœ… Complete
105
+
106
+ #### Tasks
107
+
108
+ **๐Ÿ”ด RED: Write Failing Tests First**
109
+ - [ ] **Test 1.1**: Write unit tests for [specific functionality]
110
+ - File(s): `test/unit/[feature]/[component]_test.*`
111
+ - Expected: Tests FAIL (red) because feature doesn't exist yet
112
+ - Details: Test cases covering:
113
+ - Happy path scenarios
114
+ - Edge cases
115
+ - Error conditions
116
+
117
+ - [ ] **Test 1.2**: Write integration tests for [component interaction]
118
+ - File(s): `test/integration/[feature]_test.*`
119
+ - Expected: Tests FAIL (red) because integration doesn't exist yet
120
+ - Details: Test interaction between [list components]
121
+
122
+ **๐ŸŸข GREEN: Implement to Make Tests Pass**
123
+ - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Implement [component/module]
124
+ - File(s): `src/[layer]/[component].*`
125
+ - Goal: Make Test 1.1 pass with minimal code
126
+ - Details: [Implementation notes]
127
+
128
+ - [ ] **Task 1.4**: Implement [integration/glue code]
129
+ - File(s): `src/[layer]/[integration].*`
130
+ - Goal: Make Test 1.2 pass
131
+ - Details: [Implementation notes]
132
+
133
+ **๐Ÿ”ต REFACTOR: Clean Up Code**
134
+ - [ ] **Task 1.5**: Refactor for code quality
135
+ - Files: Review all new code in this phase
136
+ - Goal: Improve design without breaking tests
137
+ - Checklist:
138
+ - [ ] Remove duplication (DRY principle)
139
+ - [ ] Improve naming clarity
140
+ - [ ] Extract reusable components
141
+ - [ ] Add inline documentation
142
+ - [ ] Optimize performance if needed
143
+
144
+ #### Quality Gate โœ‹
145
+
146
+ **โš ๏ธ STOP: Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until ALL checks pass**
147
+
148
+ **TDD Compliance** (CRITICAL):
149
+ - [ ] **Red Phase**: Tests were written FIRST and initially failed
150
+ - [ ] **Green Phase**: Production code written to make tests pass
151
+ - [ ] **Refactor Phase**: Code improved while tests still pass
152
+ - [ ] **Coverage Check**: Test coverage meets requirements
153
+ ```bash
154
+ # Example commands (adapt to your testing framework):
155
+ # npm test -- --coverage
156
+ # pytest --cov=src --cov-report=html
157
+ # dotnet test /p:CollectCoverage=true
158
+ # go test -cover ./...
159
+
160
+ [Your project's coverage command here]
161
+ ```
162
+
163
+ **Build & Tests**:
164
+ - [ ] **Build**: Project builds/compiles without errors
165
+ - [ ] **All Tests Pass**: 100% of tests passing (no skipped tests)
166
+ - [ ] **Test Performance**: Test suite completes in acceptable time
167
+ - [ ] **No Flaky Tests**: Tests pass consistently (run 3+ times)
168
+
169
+ **Code Quality**:
170
+ - [ ] **Linting**: No linting errors or warnings
171
+ - [ ] **Formatting**: Code formatted per project standards
172
+ - [ ] **Type Safety**: Type checker passes (if applicable)
173
+ - [ ] **Static Analysis**: No critical issues from static analysis tools
174
+
175
+ **Security & Performance**:
176
+ - [ ] **Dependencies**: No known security vulnerabilities
177
+ - [ ] **Performance**: No performance regressions
178
+ - [ ] **Memory**: No memory leaks or resource issues
179
+ - [ ] **Error Handling**: Proper error handling implemented
180
+
181
+ **Documentation**:
182
+ - [ ] **Code Comments**: Complex logic documented
183
+ - [ ] **API Docs**: Public interfaces documented
184
+ - [ ] **README**: Usage instructions updated if needed
185
+
186
+ **Manual Testing**:
187
+ - [ ] **Functionality**: Feature works as expected
188
+ - [ ] **Edge Cases**: Boundary conditions tested
189
+ - [ ] **Error States**: Error handling verified
190
+
191
+ **Validation Commands** (customize for your project):
192
+ ```bash
193
+ # Test Commands
194
+ [your test runner command]
195
+
196
+ # Coverage Check
197
+ [your coverage command]
198
+
199
+ # Code Quality
200
+ [your linter command]
201
+ [your formatter check command]
202
+ [your type checker command]
203
+
204
+ # Build Verification
205
+ [your build command]
206
+
207
+ # Security Audit
208
+ [your dependency audit command]
209
+
210
+ # Example for different ecosystems:
211
+ # JavaScript/TypeScript: npm test && npm run lint && npm run type-check
212
+ # Python: pytest && black --check . && mypy .
213
+ # Java: mvn test && mvn checkstyle:check
214
+ # Go: go test ./... && golangci-lint run
215
+ # .NET: dotnet test && dotnet format --verify-no-changes
216
+ # Ruby: bundle exec rspec && rubocop
217
+ # Rust: cargo test && cargo clippy
218
+ ```
219
+
220
+ **Manual Test Checklist**:
221
+ - [ ] Test case 1: [Specific scenario to verify]
222
+ - [ ] Test case 2: [Edge case to verify]
223
+ - [ ] Test case 3: [Error handling to verify]
224
+
225
+ ---
226
+
227
+ ### Phase 2: [Core Feature Phase Name]
228
+ **Goal**: [Specific deliverable]
229
+ **Estimated Time**: X hours
230
+ **Status**: โณ Pending | ๐Ÿ”„ In Progress | โœ… Complete
231
+
232
+ #### Tasks
233
+
234
+ **๐Ÿ”ด RED: Write Failing Tests First**
235
+ - [ ] **Test 2.1**: Write unit tests for [specific functionality]
236
+ - File(s): `test/unit/[feature]/[component]_test.*`
237
+ - Expected: Tests FAIL (red) because feature doesn't exist yet
238
+ - Details: Test cases covering:
239
+ - Happy path scenarios
240
+ - Edge cases
241
+ - Error conditions
242
+
243
+ - [ ] **Test 2.2**: Write integration tests for [component interaction]
244
+ - File(s): `test/integration/[feature]_test.*`
245
+ - Expected: Tests FAIL (red) because integration doesn't exist yet
246
+ - Details: Test interaction between [list components]
247
+
248
+ **๐ŸŸข GREEN: Implement to Make Tests Pass**
249
+ - [ ] **Task 2.3**: Implement [component/module]
250
+ - File(s): `src/[layer]/[component].*`
251
+ - Goal: Make Test 2.1 pass with minimal code
252
+ - Details: [Implementation notes]
253
+
254
+ - [ ] **Task 2.4**: Implement [integration/glue code]
255
+ - File(s): `src/[layer]/[integration].*`
256
+ - Goal: Make Test 2.2 pass
257
+ - Details: [Implementation notes]
258
+
259
+ **๐Ÿ”ต REFACTOR: Clean Up Code**
260
+ - [ ] **Task 2.5**: Refactor for code quality
261
+ - Files: Review all new code in this phase
262
+ - Goal: Improve design without breaking tests
263
+ - Checklist:
264
+ - [ ] Remove duplication (DRY principle)
265
+ - [ ] Improve naming clarity
266
+ - [ ] Extract reusable components
267
+ - [ ] Add inline documentation
268
+ - [ ] Optimize performance if needed
269
+
270
+ #### Quality Gate โœ‹
271
+
272
+ **โš ๏ธ STOP: Do NOT proceed to Phase 3 until ALL checks pass**
273
+
274
+ **TDD Compliance** (CRITICAL):
275
+ - [ ] **Red Phase**: Tests were written FIRST and initially failed
276
+ - [ ] **Green Phase**: Production code written to make tests pass
277
+ - [ ] **Refactor Phase**: Code improved while tests still pass
278
+ - [ ] **Coverage Check**: Test coverage meets requirements
279
+
280
+ **Build & Tests**:
281
+ - [ ] **Build**: Project builds/compiles without errors
282
+ - [ ] **All Tests Pass**: 100% of tests passing (no skipped tests)
283
+ - [ ] **Test Performance**: Test suite completes in acceptable time
284
+ - [ ] **No Flaky Tests**: Tests pass consistently (run 3+ times)
285
+
286
+ **Code Quality**:
287
+ - [ ] **Linting**: No linting errors or warnings
288
+ - [ ] **Formatting**: Code formatted per project standards
289
+ - [ ] **Type Safety**: Type checker passes (if applicable)
290
+ - [ ] **Static Analysis**: No critical issues from static analysis tools
291
+
292
+ **Security & Performance**:
293
+ - [ ] **Dependencies**: No known security vulnerabilities
294
+ - [ ] **Performance**: No performance regressions
295
+ - [ ] **Memory**: No memory leaks or resource issues
296
+ - [ ] **Error Handling**: Proper error handling implemented
297
+
298
+ **Documentation**:
299
+ - [ ] **Code Comments**: Complex logic documented
300
+ - [ ] **API Docs**: Public interfaces documented
301
+ - [ ] **README**: Usage instructions updated if needed
302
+
303
+ **Manual Testing**:
304
+ - [ ] **Functionality**: Feature works as expected
305
+ - [ ] **Edge Cases**: Boundary conditions tested
306
+ - [ ] **Error States**: Error handling verified
307
+
308
+ **Validation Commands**:
309
+ ```bash
310
+ [Same as Phase 1 - customize for your project]
311
+ ```
312
+
313
+ **Manual Test Checklist**:
314
+ - [ ] Test case 1: [Specific scenario to verify]
315
+ - [ ] Test case 2: [Edge case to verify]
316
+ - [ ] Test case 3: [Error handling to verify]
317
+
318
+ ---
319
+
320
+ ### Phase 3: [Enhancement Phase Name]
321
+ **Goal**: [Specific deliverable]
322
+ **Estimated Time**: X hours
323
+ **Status**: โณ Pending | ๐Ÿ”„ In Progress | โœ… Complete
324
+
325
+ #### Tasks
326
+
327
+ **๐Ÿ”ด RED: Write Failing Tests First**
328
+ - [ ] **Test 3.1**: Write unit tests for [specific functionality]
329
+ - File(s): `test/unit/[feature]/[component]_test.*`
330
+ - Expected: Tests FAIL (red) because feature doesn't exist yet
331
+ - Details: Test cases covering:
332
+ - Happy path scenarios
333
+ - Edge cases
334
+ - Error conditions
335
+
336
+ - [ ] **Test 3.2**: Write integration tests for [component interaction]
337
+ - File(s): `test/integration/[feature]_test.*`
338
+ - Expected: Tests FAIL (red) because integration doesn't exist yet
339
+ - Details: Test interaction between [list components]
340
+
341
+ **๐ŸŸข GREEN: Implement to Make Tests Pass**
342
+ - [ ] **Task 3.3**: Implement [component/module]
343
+ - File(s): `src/[layer]/[component].*`
344
+ - Goal: Make Test 3.1 pass with minimal code
345
+ - Details: [Implementation notes]
346
+
347
+ - [ ] **Task 3.4**: Implement [integration/glue code]
348
+ - File(s): `src/[layer]/[integration].*`
349
+ - Goal: Make Test 3.2 pass
350
+ - Details: [Implementation notes]
351
+
352
+ **๐Ÿ”ต REFACTOR: Clean Up Code**
353
+ - [ ] **Task 3.5**: Refactor for code quality
354
+ - Files: Review all new code in this phase
355
+ - Goal: Improve design without breaking tests
356
+ - Checklist:
357
+ - [ ] Remove duplication (DRY principle)
358
+ - [ ] Improve naming clarity
359
+ - [ ] Extract reusable components
360
+ - [ ] Add inline documentation
361
+ - [ ] Optimize performance if needed
362
+
363
+ #### Quality Gate โœ‹
364
+
365
+ **โš ๏ธ STOP: Do NOT proceed until ALL checks pass**
366
+
367
+ **TDD Compliance** (CRITICAL):
368
+ - [ ] **Red Phase**: Tests were written FIRST and initially failed
369
+ - [ ] **Green Phase**: Production code written to make tests pass
370
+ - [ ] **Refactor Phase**: Code improved while tests still pass
371
+ - [ ] **Coverage Check**: Test coverage meets requirements
372
+
373
+ **Build & Tests**:
374
+ - [ ] **Build**: Project builds/compiles without errors
375
+ - [ ] **All Tests Pass**: 100% of tests passing (no skipped tests)
376
+ - [ ] **Test Performance**: Test suite completes in acceptable time
377
+ - [ ] **No Flaky Tests**: Tests pass consistently (run 3+ times)
378
+
379
+ **Code Quality**:
380
+ - [ ] **Linting**: No linting errors or warnings
381
+ - [ ] **Formatting**: Code formatted per project standards
382
+ - [ ] **Type Safety**: Type checker passes (if applicable)
383
+ - [ ] **Static Analysis**: No critical issues from static analysis tools
384
+
385
+ **Security & Performance**:
386
+ - [ ] **Dependencies**: No known security vulnerabilities
387
+ - [ ] **Performance**: No performance regressions
388
+ - [ ] **Memory**: No memory leaks or resource issues
389
+ - [ ] **Error Handling**: Proper error handling implemented
390
+
391
+ **Documentation**:
392
+ - [ ] **Code Comments**: Complex logic documented
393
+ - [ ] **API Docs**: Public interfaces documented
394
+ - [ ] **README**: Usage instructions updated if needed
395
+
396
+ **Manual Testing**:
397
+ - [ ] **Functionality**: Feature works as expected
398
+ - [ ] **Edge Cases**: Boundary conditions tested
399
+ - [ ] **Error States**: Error handling verified
400
+
401
+ **Validation Commands**:
402
+ ```bash
403
+ [Same as previous phases - customize for your project]
404
+ ```
405
+
406
+ **Manual Test Checklist**:
407
+ - [ ] Test case 1: [Specific scenario to verify]
408
+ - [ ] Test case 2: [Edge case to verify]
409
+ - [ ] Test case 3: [Error handling to verify]
410
+
411
+ ---
412
+
413
+ ## โš ๏ธ Risk Assessment
414
+
415
+ | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
416
+ |------|-------------|--------|---------------------|
417
+ | [Risk 1: e.g., API changes break integration] | Low/Med/High | Low/Med/High | [Specific mitigation steps] |
418
+ | [Risk 2: e.g., Performance degradation] | Low/Med/High | Low/Med/High | [Specific mitigation steps] |
419
+ | [Risk 3: e.g., Database migration issues] | Low/Med/High | Low/Med/High | [Specific mitigation steps] |
420
+
421
+ ---
422
+
423
+ ## ๐Ÿ”„ Rollback Strategy
424
+
425
+ ### If Phase 1 Fails
426
+ **Steps to revert**:
427
+ - Undo code changes in: [list files]
428
+ - Restore configuration: [specific settings]
429
+ - Remove dependencies: [if any were added]
430
+
431
+ ### If Phase 2 Fails
432
+ **Steps to revert**:
433
+ - Restore to Phase 1 complete state
434
+ - Undo changes in: [list files]
435
+ - Database rollback: [if applicable]
436
+
437
+ ### If Phase 3 Fails
438
+ **Steps to revert**:
439
+ - Restore to Phase 2 complete state
440
+ - [Additional cleanup steps]
441
+
442
+ ---
443
+
444
+ ## ๐Ÿ“Š Progress Tracking
445
+
446
+ ### Completion Status
447
+ - **Phase 1**: โณ 0% | ๐Ÿ”„ 50% | โœ… 100%
448
+ - **Phase 2**: โณ 0% | ๐Ÿ”„ 50% | โœ… 100%
449
+ - **Phase 3**: โณ 0% | ๐Ÿ”„ 50% | โœ… 100%
450
+
451
+ **Overall Progress**: X% complete
452
+
453
+ ### Time Tracking
454
+ | Phase | Estimated | Actual | Variance |
455
+ |-------|-----------|--------|----------|
456
+ | Phase 1 | X hours | Y hours | +/- Z hours |
457
+ | Phase 2 | X hours | - | - |
458
+ | Phase 3 | X hours | - | - |
459
+ | **Total** | X hours | Y hours | +/- Z hours |
460
+
461
+ ---
462
+
463
+ ## ๐Ÿ“ Notes & Learnings
464
+
465
+ ### Implementation Notes
466
+ - [Add insights discovered during implementation]
467
+ - [Document decisions that deviate from original plan]
468
+ - [Record helpful debugging discoveries]
469
+
470
+ ### Blockers Encountered
471
+ - **Blocker 1**: [Description] โ†’ [Resolution]
472
+ - **Blocker 2**: [Description] โ†’ [Resolution]
473
+
474
+ ### Improvements for Future Plans
475
+ - [What would you do differently next time?]
476
+ - [What worked particularly well?]
477
+
478
+ ---
479
+
480
+ ## ๐Ÿ“š References
481
+
482
+ ### Documentation
483
+ - [Link to relevant docs]
484
+ - [Link to API references]
485
+ - [Link to design mockups]
486
+
487
+ ### Related Issues
488
+ - Issue #X: [Description]
489
+ - PR #Y: [Description]
490
+
491
+ ---
492
+
493
+ ## โœ… Final Checklist
494
+
495
+ **Before marking plan as COMPLETE**:
496
+ - [ ] All phases completed with quality gates passed
497
+ - [ ] Full integration testing performed
498
+ - [ ] Documentation updated
499
+ - [ ] Performance benchmarks meet targets
500
+ - [ ] Security review completed
501
+ - [ ] Accessibility requirements met (if UI feature)
502
+ - [ ] All stakeholders notified
503
+ - [ ] Plan document archived for future reference
504
+
505
+ ---
506
+
507
+ ## ๐Ÿ“– TDD Example Workflow
508
+
509
+ ### Example: Adding User Authentication Feature
510
+
511
+ **Phase 1: RED (Write Failing Tests)**
512
+
513
+ ```
514
+ # Pseudocode - adapt to your testing framework
515
+
516
+ test "should validate user credentials":
517
+ // Arrange
518
+ authService = new AuthService(mockDatabase)
519
+ validCredentials = {username: "user", password: "pass"}
520
+
521
+ // Act
522
+ result = authService.authenticate(validCredentials)
523
+
524
+ // Assert
525
+ expect(result.isSuccess).toBe(true)
526
+ expect(result.user).toBeDefined()
527
+ // TEST FAILS - AuthService doesn't exist yet
528
+ ```
529
+
530
+ **Phase 2: GREEN (Minimal Implementation)**
531
+
532
+ ```
533
+ class AuthService:
534
+ function authenticate(credentials):
535
+ // Minimal code to make test pass
536
+ user = database.findUser(credentials.username)
537
+ if user AND user.password == credentials.password:
538
+ return Success(user)
539
+ return Failure("Invalid credentials")
540
+ // TEST PASSES - minimal functionality works
541
+ ```
542
+
543
+ **Phase 3: REFACTOR (Improve Design)**
544
+
545
+ ```
546
+ class AuthService:
547
+ function authenticate(credentials):
548
+ // Add validation
549
+ if not this.validateCredentials(credentials):
550
+ return Failure("Invalid input")
551
+
552
+ // Add error handling
553
+ try:
554
+ user = database.findUser(credentials.username)
555
+
556
+ // Use secure password comparison
557
+ if user AND this.secureCompare(user.password, credentials.password):
558
+ return Success(user)
559
+
560
+ return Failure("Invalid credentials")
561
+ catch DatabaseError as error:
562
+ logger.error(error)
563
+ return Failure("Authentication failed")
564
+ // TESTS STILL PASS - improved code quality
565
+ ```
566
+
567
+ ### TDD Red-Green-Refactor Cycle Visualization
568
+
569
+ ```
570
+ Phase 1: ๐Ÿ”ด RED
571
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Write test for feature X
572
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Run test โ†’ FAILS โŒ
573
+ โ””โ”€โ”€ Commit: "Add failing test for X"
574
+
575
+ Phase 2: ๐ŸŸข GREEN
576
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Write minimal code
577
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Run test โ†’ PASSES โœ…
578
+ โ””โ”€โ”€ Commit: "Implement X to pass tests"
579
+
580
+ Phase 3: ๐Ÿ”ต REFACTOR
581
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Improve code quality
582
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Run test โ†’ STILL PASSES โœ…
583
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Extract helper methods
584
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Run test โ†’ STILL PASSES โœ…
585
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Improve naming
586
+ โ”œโ”€โ”€ Run test โ†’ STILL PASSES โœ…
587
+ โ””โ”€โ”€ Commit: "Refactor X for better design"
588
+
589
+ Repeat for next feature โ†’
590
+ ```
591
+
592
+ ### Benefits of This Approach
593
+
594
+ **Safety**: Tests catch regressions immediately
595
+ **Design**: Tests force you to think about API design first
596
+ **Documentation**: Tests document expected behavior
597
+ **Confidence**: Refactor without fear of breaking things
598
+ **Quality**: Higher code coverage from day one
599
+ **Debugging**: Failures point to exact problem area
600
+
601
+ ---
602
+
603
+ **Plan Status**: ๐Ÿ”„ In Progress
604
+ **Next Action**: [What needs to happen next]
605
+ **Blocked By**: [Any current blockers] or None