@yemi33/minions 0.1.994 → 0.1.996
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +3 -2
- package/engine/watches.js +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/playbooks/shared-rules.md +3 -0
- package/prompts/cc-system.md +3 -0
- package/routing.md +1 -0
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# Changelog
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
## 0.1.
|
|
3
|
+
## 0.1.996 (2026-04-15)
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
5
|
### Features
|
|
6
6
|
- fix stopAfter=0 watch expiry — run forever for all conditions (#1117)
|
|
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
|
|
|
25
25
|
- gate auto-fix conflict dispatch behind autoFixConflicts flag
|
|
26
26
|
|
|
27
27
|
### Fixes
|
|
28
|
+
- restore WATCH_ABSOLUTE_CONDITIONS import in watches.js lost in #1117 squash merge
|
|
28
29
|
- remove dead 'meeting' row from routing.md — orchestrated by engine/meeting.js directly
|
|
29
30
|
- gate review auto-dispatch on adoPollEnabled and evalLoop (#1116)
|
|
30
31
|
- updatePrAfterReview preserves fixedAt when writing minionsReview
|
|
@@ -44,9 +45,9 @@
|
|
|
44
45
|
- loop queue flush so messages queued during combined send aren't orphaned
|
|
45
46
|
- set lastPushedAt on fix completion to unblock re-review without poller
|
|
46
47
|
- restore ADO throttle test functions deleted during merge conflict resolution
|
|
47
|
-
- trigger second-pass re-review after fix agent completes
|
|
48
48
|
|
|
49
49
|
### Other
|
|
50
|
+
- chore: strengthen prompts and routing
|
|
50
51
|
- chore: harden prompt posture
|
|
51
52
|
- refactor(watches): rename maxTriggers→stopAfter, add onNotMet per-poll action
|
|
52
53
|
- refactor(dashboard): extract _releaseCCTab helper and CC_LOCK_WAIT_MS constant
|
package/engine/watches.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
|
|
|
11
11
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
12
12
|
const shared = require('./shared');
|
|
13
13
|
const { safeJson, mutateJsonFileLocked, ts, uid, log, writeToInbox,
|
|
14
|
-
WATCH_STATUS, WATCH_TARGET_TYPE, WATCH_CONDITION } = shared;
|
|
14
|
+
WATCH_STATUS, WATCH_TARGET_TYPE, WATCH_CONDITION, WATCH_ABSOLUTE_CONDITIONS } = shared;
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
16
|
// Dynamic path — respects MINIONS_TEST_DIR for test isolation
|
|
17
17
|
function _watchesPath() { return path.join(shared.MINIONS_DIR, 'engine', 'watches.json'); }
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@yemi33/minions",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.1.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.1.996",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Multi-agent AI dev team that runs from ~/.minions/ — five autonomous agents share a single engine, dashboard, and knowledge base",
|
|
5
5
|
"bin": {
|
|
6
6
|
"minions": "bin/minions.js"
|
|
@@ -6,9 +6,12 @@ Codex will review your changes — make sure your implementation is thorough and
|
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
- Act like you've already explained this yesterday. Do not ramble, re-teach obvious basics, or pad the answer. Get to the point fast.
|
|
8
8
|
- You are an IQ 150 software engineering specialist. If the reasoning is average, vague, or hand-wavy, it is wrong.
|
|
9
|
+
- You have a student who is eagerly trying to learn from you. Display model behavior: be rigorous, teach cleanly, and show what good engineering thinking looks like.
|
|
9
10
|
- Explain concepts like you are teaching a packed auditorium. If the structure is weak or the example is forgettable, the explanation failed.
|
|
11
|
+
- Always verify your claims. If you state something as true, earn it.
|
|
10
12
|
- Treat every answer like there is $100 on the line. Sloppy logic, missed edge cases, and fake confidence lose the bet.
|
|
11
13
|
- Assume another CLI is going to review the code and try to prove you wrong. Close every hole before you answer.
|
|
14
|
+
- Leave no stone unturned when implementing or explaining. Half-checks, shallow analysis, and partial reasoning are not acceptable.
|
|
12
15
|
|
|
13
16
|
## Context Window Awareness
|
|
14
17
|
|
package/prompts/cc-system.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -9,9 +9,12 @@ Codex will review your changes — make sure your implementation is thorough and
|
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
10
|
- Act like you've already explained this yesterday. Do not ramble, re-teach obvious basics, or pad the answer. Get to the point fast.
|
|
11
11
|
- You are an IQ 150 software engineering specialist. If the reasoning is average, vague, or hand-wavy, it is wrong.
|
|
12
|
+
- You have a student who is eagerly trying to learn from you. Display model behavior: be rigorous, teach cleanly, and show what good engineering thinking looks like.
|
|
12
13
|
- Explain concepts like you are teaching a packed auditorium. If the structure is weak or the example is forgettable, the explanation failed.
|
|
14
|
+
- Always verify your claims. If you state something as true, earn it.
|
|
13
15
|
- Treat every answer like there is $100 on the line. Sloppy logic, missed edge cases, and fake confidence lose the bet.
|
|
14
16
|
- Assume another CLI is going to review the code and try to prove you wrong. Close every hole before you answer.
|
|
17
|
+
- Leave no stone unturned when implementing or explaining. Half-checks, shallow analysis, and partial reasoning are not acceptable.
|
|
15
18
|
|
|
16
19
|
## Guardrails
|
|
17
20
|
READ ONLY — never write/edit: `engine.js`, `engine/*.js`, `dashboard.js`, `dashboard/**`, `minions.js`, `bin/*.js`, `engine/control.json`, `engine/dispatch.json`, `config.json`.
|
package/routing.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ How the engine decides who handles what. Parsed by engine.js — keep the table
|
|
|
18
18
|
| ask | ripley | rebecca |
|
|
19
19
|
| verify | dallas | ralph |
|
|
20
20
|
| decompose | ripley | rebecca |
|
|
21
|
+
| meeting | ripley | lambert |
|
|
21
22
|
|
|
22
23
|
Notes:
|
|
23
24
|
- `_author_` means route to the PR author
|