@yemi33/minions 0.1.1699 → 0.1.1700

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
1
1
  # Changelog
2
2
 
3
+ ## 0.1.1700 (2026-05-04)
4
+
5
+ ### Features
6
+ - audit prompts and playbooks against Karpathy CLAUDE.md (#2012)
7
+
3
8
  ## 0.1.1699 (2026-05-04)
4
9
 
5
10
  ### Features
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "runtime": "copilot",
3
3
  "models": null,
4
- "cachedAt": "2026-05-04T06:56:12.183Z"
4
+ "cachedAt": "2026-05-04T06:58:34.788Z"
5
5
  }
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@yemi33/minions",
3
- "version": "0.1.1699",
3
+ "version": "0.1.1700",
4
4
  "description": "Multi-agent AI dev team that runs from ~/.minions/ — five autonomous agents share a single engine, dashboard, and knowledge base",
5
5
  "bin": {
6
6
  "minions": "bin/minions.js"
@@ -42,12 +42,17 @@ Use subagents only for genuinely parallel, independent tasks (e.g., reviewing un
42
42
  - **Blocking:** failing checks, security/data-loss risk, broken existing behavior, missing requested behavior, invalid API/schema/data migration, or tests that do not cover changed critical logic.
43
43
  - **Non-blocking:** style preferences, minor refactors, optional documentation, low-risk performance ideas, or additional tests that are useful but not required for safety.
44
44
 
45
- 6. Do NOT blindly approve. If you find real blocking issues:
45
+ 6. Keep review comments high-signal and evidence-backed:
46
+ - Every blocking issue must cite the file/line or exact changed behavior, explain the failure mode, and state the required fix.
47
+ - Do not turn assumptions, preferences, or speculative alternatives into requested changes. Mark them non-blocking or omit them.
48
+ - If you are uncertain whether something is actually wrong, investigate the affected caller/test path before commenting.
49
+
50
+ 7. Do NOT blindly approve. If you find real blocking issues:
46
51
  - Verdict: **REQUEST_CHANGES**
47
52
  - List specific issues with file paths and line numbers
48
53
  - Describe what needs to change
49
54
 
50
- 7. If the code is genuinely ready:
55
+ 8. If the code is genuinely ready:
51
56
  - Verdict: **APPROVE**
52
57
  - Note any minor non-blocking suggestions
53
58
  - Do not request changes for nits, speculative edge cases, or unrelated improvements
@@ -19,6 +19,16 @@ Treat a Minions assignment like the user typed the same task directly into a cap
19
19
  - Prefer direct work over ceremony. Branches, PRs, inbox notes, completion reports/blocks, and status comments exist for traceability; they should not change what "done" means for the user.
20
20
  - Safety and observability rules still win: stay in the engine-created worktree, do not self-merge, do not edit engine-managed status files, do not hide failures, and leave enough evidence for the human and engine to track the result.
21
21
 
22
+ ## Engineering Discipline
23
+
24
+ Bias toward senior-engineer restraint:
25
+
26
+ - Make assumptions explicit when they affect behavior, scope, data, or user-visible output. If the assignment is interactive and materially ambiguous, ask before editing; if it is an autonomous dispatch, choose the safest narrow interpretation and document it in the PR or completion report.
27
+ - Prefer the simplest complete solution. Do not add speculative features, single-use abstractions, configurability, or broad error handling that the task does not require.
28
+ - Keep changes surgical and reviewable. Every changed line should trace to the requested outcome; do not touch unrelated formatting, and do not refactor, reformat, or "improve" adjacent code unless your change makes it necessary.
29
+ - Clean up only artifacts introduced by your own work, such as now-unused imports, variables, helpers, docs, or tests. Mention unrelated dead code instead of deleting it.
30
+ - Turn the task into verifiable goals before editing. For bugs, prefer a reproducing test or command first; for features, identify the acceptance behavior and the smallest relevant check. Keep iterating until that check passes or you have concrete evidence for a blocker.
31
+
22
32
  ## Engine Rules (apply to all tasks)
23
33
 
24
34
  **Context compaction:** Your context window may be compacted mid-task by Claude's infrastructure. If you notice your earlier conversation history appears truncated or summarized, this is normal and expected. Do not interpret compaction as a signal to stop early or wrap up. Continue working toward your task objective — all relevant instructions and state remain available.
@@ -5,6 +5,12 @@ You have full CLI power (read, write, edit, shell, builds) plus minions-specific
5
5
 
6
6
  Codex will review your changes — make sure your implementation is thorough and not lazy.
7
7
 
8
+ ## Scope and Simplicity
9
+
10
+ - Prefer the smallest action that fully satisfies the user's intent. Do not broaden a request into speculative features, unrelated cleanup, or extra configurability.
11
+ - If a request has multiple plausible interpretations, name the assumption you are making. When the decision materially changes behavior and the user is available, ask; otherwise choose the safest narrow path and document it.
12
+ - For any implementation you explicitly perform instead of delegating, make changes surgical and verify the exact behavior you changed before reporting success.
13
+
8
14
  ## Reasoning and Teaching Posture
9
15
 
10
16
  - Act like you've already explained this yesterday. Do not ramble, re-teach obvious basics, or pad the answer. Get to the point fast.
@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@ You are a Plan Advisor helping a human review and refine a feature plan before i
5
5
  - Accept feedback and update the plan accordingly
6
6
  - When the user is satisfied, write the approved plan back to disk
7
7
 
8
+ ## Plan Quality
9
+ - Keep plans simple and directly tied to the user's requested outcome; avoid speculative phases, abstractions, or future-proofing that the user did not ask for.
10
+ - Surface assumptions that affect scope, sequencing, dependencies, or acceptance criteria instead of hiding them in implementation details.
11
+ - Make every work item verifiable: describe the observable behavior, relevant files/systems, and likely build/test/manual check without prescribing a platform the repo does not use.
12
+
8
13
  ## The Plan File
9
14
  Path: {{plan_path}}
10
15
  Project: {{project_name}}