@xopcai/xopc 0.0.84 → 0.0.86

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/debug-incident.js

@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+//#region src/agent/workflow/builtins/debug-incident.ts
+/**
+* Built-in workflow: `debug_incident`
+*
+* Triage an error, stack trace, or log snippet. Parses the signal, fans out
+* parallel hypotheses (config, race, dependency, data, environment), then
+* ranks likely root causes with verification steps.
+*
+* Args:
+*   - error: error message or stack trace
+*   - logs: optional log excerpt
+*   - context: optional extra context (what changed, when it started)
+*/
+const DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT = `export const meta = {
+  name: 'debug_incident',
+  description: 'Triage an error or log snippet with parallel hypotheses and ranked root-cause analysis.',
+  whenToUse: 'User reports a bug, crash, error message, or unexpected behavior and wants systematic triage.',
+  tags: ['debug', 'incident', 'troubleshooting'],
+  estimatedAgents: { min: 7, max: 7 },
+  phases: [
+    { title: 'Triage' },
+    { title: 'Hypotheses' },
+    { title: 'Rank' },
+  ],
+}
+
+const READ_TOOLS = ['read_file', 'grep', 'find', 'list_dir', 'shell']
+
+const error = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.error
+  ? String(args.error)
+  : 'Infer the primary error from the most recent user message or conversation context.'
+
+const logs = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.logs
+  ? String(args.logs)
+  : ''
+
+const context = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.context
+  ? String(args.context)
+  : ''
+
+phase('Triage')
+const triage = await agent(
+  'Parse this incident signal. Extract: error type, likely subsystem, affected files/modules if identifiable, and 2–3 key facts from logs.\\n\\n' +
+    'ERROR:\\n' + error + '\\n\\n' +
+    (logs ? 'LOGS:\\n' + logs + '\\n\\n' : '') +
+    (context ? 'CONTEXT:\\n' + context + '\\n\\n' : '') +
+    'Use read/grep tools to locate relevant code if the workspace may contain the failing path.',
+  {
+    label: 'incident triage',
+    toolset: READ_TOOLS,
+    schema: {
+      type: 'object',
+      properties: {
+        errorType: { type: 'string' },
+        subsystem: { type: 'string' },
+        affectedPaths: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },
+        keyFacts: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },
+      },
+      required: ['errorType', 'keyFacts'],
+    },
+  },
+)
+
+const HYPOTHESES = [
+  { key: 'config', angle: 'Misconfiguration, missing env vars, wrong defaults, feature flags, stale config cache.' },
+  { key: 'race', angle: 'Concurrency, timing, ordering, partial failure under load, missing locks or awaits.' },
+  { key: 'dependency', angle: 'Version mismatch, breaking upstream change, network/API failure, timeout, auth expiry.' },
+  { key: 'data', angle: 'Bad input, schema drift, null/empty edge case, corrupt state, migration gap.' },
+  { key: 'environment', angle: 'OS, permissions, disk, memory, container/network isolation, platform-specific behavior.' },
+]
+
+phase('Hypotheses')
+const hypothesisReports = await parallel(
+  HYPOTHESES.map((h) => () =>
+    agent(
+      'Evaluate whether this hypothesis explains the incident. Search the codebase for supporting or refuting evidence.\\n\\n' +
+        'HYPOTHESIS: ' + h.key + ' — ' + h.angle + '\\n\\n' +
+        'TRIAGE:\\n' + JSON.stringify(triage, null, 2) + '\\n\\n' +
+        'ERROR:\\n' + error + '\\n\\n' +
+        (logs ? 'LOGS:\\n' + logs + '\\n\\n' : '') +
+        'Return: likelihood (low/med/high), evidence (file paths + brief notes), and one verification step.',
+      {
+        label: h.key + ' hypothesis',
+        toolset: READ_TOOLS,
+        schema: {
+          type: 'object',
+          properties: {
+            likelihood: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high'] },
+            evidence: {
+              type: 'array',
+              items: {
+                type: 'object',
+                properties: {
+                  path: { type: 'string' },
+                  note: { type: 'string' },
+                },
+                required: ['path', 'note'],
+              },
+            },
+            verificationStep: { type: 'string' },
+          },
+          required: ['likelihood', 'evidence', 'verificationStep'],
+        },
+      },
+    ),
+  ),
+)
+
+phase('Rank')
+const live = hypothesisReports.filter(Boolean)
+const byHypothesis = {}
+for (let i = 0; i < HYPOTHESES.length; i++) {
+  byHypothesis[HYPOTHESES[i].key] = live[i] ?? null
+}
+
+const ranking = await agent(
+  'Rank root causes by likelihood. Pick the top 3 with confidence and concrete next steps to confirm or fix.\\n\\n' +
+    JSON.stringify({ triage, byHypothesis }, null, 2),
+  {
+    label: 'root cause ranking',
+    schema: {
+      type: 'object',
+      properties: {
+        topCauses: {
+          type: 'array',
+          items: {
+            type: 'object',
+            properties: {
+              hypothesis: { type: 'string' },
+              likelihood: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high'] },
+              summary: { type: 'string' },
+              nextStep: { type: 'string' },
+            },
+            required: ['hypothesis', 'likelihood', 'summary', 'nextStep'],
+          },
+        },
+        immediateActions: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },
+        summary: { type: 'string' },
+      },
+      required: ['topCauses', 'summary'],
+    },
+  },
+)
+
+return {
+  ok: true,
+  triage,
+  ...(ranking ?? { topCauses: [], summary: 'ranking failed', immediateActions: [] }),
+  byHypothesis,
+}
+`;
+//#endregion
+export { DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT };
+
+//# sourceMappingURL=debug-incident.js.map

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/debug-incident.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"debug-incident.js","names":[],"sources":["../../../../../src/agent/workflow/builtins/debug-incident.ts"],"sourcesContent":["/**\n * Built-in workflow: `debug_incident`\n *\n * Triage an error, stack trace, or log snippet. Parses the signal, fans out\n * parallel hypotheses (config, race, dependency, data, environment), then\n * ranks likely root causes with verification steps.\n *\n * Args:\n *   - error: error message or stack trace\n *   - logs: optional log excerpt\n *   - context: optional extra context (what changed, when it started)\n */\n\nexport const DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT = `export const meta = {\n  name: 'debug_incident',\n  description: 'Triage an error or log snippet with parallel hypotheses and ranked root-cause analysis.',\n  whenToUse: 'User reports a bug, crash, error message, or unexpected behavior and wants systematic triage.',\n  tags: ['debug', 'incident', 'troubleshooting'],\n  estimatedAgents: { min: 7, max: 7 },\n  phases: [\n    { title: 'Triage' },\n    { title: 'Hypotheses' },\n    { title: 'Rank' },\n  ],\n}\n\nconst READ_TOOLS = ['read_file', 'grep', 'find', 'list_dir', 'shell']\n\nconst error = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.error\n  ? String(args.error)\n  : 'Infer the primary error from the most recent user message or conversation context.'\n\nconst logs = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.logs\n  ? String(args.logs)\n  : ''\n\nconst context = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.context\n  ? String(args.context)\n  : ''\n\nphase('Triage')\nconst triage = await agent(\n  'Parse this incident signal. Extract: error type, likely subsystem, affected files/modules if identifiable, and 2–3 key facts from logs.\\\\n\\\\n' +\n    'ERROR:\\\\n' + error + '\\\\n\\\\n' +\n    (logs ? 'LOGS:\\\\n' + logs + '\\\\n\\\\n' : '') +\n    (context ? 'CONTEXT:\\\\n' + context + '\\\\n\\\\n' : '') +\n    'Use read/grep tools to locate relevant code if the workspace may contain the failing path.',\n  {\n    label: 'incident triage',\n    toolset: READ_TOOLS,\n    schema: {\n      type: 'object',\n      properties: {\n        errorType: { type: 'string' },\n        subsystem: { type: 'string' },\n        affectedPaths: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },\n        keyFacts: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },\n      },\n      required: ['errorType', 'keyFacts'],\n    },\n  },\n)\n\nconst HYPOTHESES = [\n  { key: 'config', angle: 'Misconfiguration, missing env vars, wrong defaults, feature flags, stale config cache.' },\n  { key: 'race', angle: 'Concurrency, timing, ordering, partial failure under load, missing locks or awaits.' },\n  { key: 'dependency', angle: 'Version mismatch, breaking upstream change, network/API failure, timeout, auth expiry.' },\n  { key: 'data', angle: 'Bad input, schema drift, null/empty edge case, corrupt state, migration gap.' },\n  { key: 'environment', angle: 'OS, permissions, disk, memory, container/network isolation, platform-specific behavior.' },\n]\n\nphase('Hypotheses')\nconst hypothesisReports = await parallel(\n  HYPOTHESES.map((h) => () =>\n    agent(\n      'Evaluate whether this hypothesis explains the incident. Search the codebase for supporting or refuting evidence.\\\\n\\\\n' +\n        'HYPOTHESIS: ' + h.key + ' — ' + h.angle + '\\\\n\\\\n' +\n        'TRIAGE:\\\\n' + JSON.stringify(triage, null, 2) + '\\\\n\\\\n' +\n        'ERROR:\\\\n' + error + '\\\\n\\\\n' +\n        (logs ? 'LOGS:\\\\n' + logs + '\\\\n\\\\n' : '') +\n        'Return: likelihood (low/med/high), evidence (file paths + brief notes), and one verification step.',\n      {\n        label: h.key + ' hypothesis',\n        toolset: READ_TOOLS,\n        schema: {\n          type: 'object',\n          properties: {\n            likelihood: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high'] },\n            evidence: {\n              type: 'array',\n              items: {\n                type: 'object',\n                properties: {\n                  path: { type: 'string' },\n                  note: { type: 'string' },\n                },\n                required: ['path', 'note'],\n              },\n            },\n            verificationStep: { type: 'string' },\n          },\n          required: ['likelihood', 'evidence', 'verificationStep'],\n        },\n      },\n    ),\n  ),\n)\n\nphase('Rank')\nconst live = hypothesisReports.filter(Boolean)\nconst byHypothesis = {}\nfor (let i = 0; i < HYPOTHESES.length; i++) {\n  byHypothesis[HYPOTHESES[i].key] = live[i] ?? null\n}\n\nconst ranking = await agent(\n  'Rank root causes by likelihood. Pick the top 3 with confidence and concrete next steps to confirm or fix.\\\\n\\\\n' +\n    JSON.stringify({ triage, byHypothesis }, null, 2),\n  {\n    label: 'root cause ranking',\n    schema: {\n      type: 'object',\n      properties: {\n        topCauses: {\n          type: 'array',\n          items: {\n            type: 'object',\n            properties: {\n              hypothesis: { type: 'string' },\n              likelihood: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high'] },\n              summary: { type: 'string' },\n              nextStep: { type: 'string' },\n            },\n            required: ['hypothesis', 'likelihood', 'summary', 'nextStep'],\n          },\n        },\n        immediateActions: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },\n        summary: { type: 'string' },\n      },\n      required: ['topCauses', 'summary'],\n    },\n  },\n)\n\nreturn {\n  ok: true,\n  triage,\n  ...(ranking ?? { topCauses: [], summary: 'ranking failed', immediateActions: [] }),\n  byHypothesis,\n}\n`\n"],"mappings":";;;;;;;;;;;;;AAaA,MAAa,wBAAwB"}

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/index.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/**
+ * Bundled workflow templates. These are shipped with xopc and discoverable
+ * via the catalog alongside user workflows in `~/.xopc/workflows/`. A user
+ * workflow with the same `name` always wins — built-ins are starting points,
+ * not authority.
+ */
+import { AUDIT_REPO_SCRIPT } from './audit-repo.js';
+import { DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT } from './debug-incident.js';
+import { MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT } from './multi-perspective-review.js';
+import { PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT } from './pr-review.js';
+import { RESEARCH_SCRIPT } from './research.js';
+export interface BuiltinWorkflow {
+    name: string;
+    script: string;
+}
+export declare const BUILTIN_WORKFLOWS: readonly BuiltinWorkflow[];
+export { AUDIT_REPO_SCRIPT, DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT, MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT, PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT, RESEARCH_SCRIPT, };

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+import { AUDIT_REPO_SCRIPT } from "./audit-repo.js";
+import { DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT } from "./debug-incident.js";
+import { MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT } from "./multi-perspective-review.js";
+import { PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT } from "./pr-review.js";
+import { RESEARCH_SCRIPT } from "./research.js";
+//#region src/agent/workflow/builtins/index.ts
+/**
+* Bundled workflow templates. These are shipped with xopc and discoverable
+* via the catalog alongside user workflows in `~/.xopc/workflows/`. A user
+* workflow with the same `name` always wins — built-ins are starting points,
+* not authority.
+*/
+const BUILTIN_WORKFLOWS = Object.freeze([
+	{
+		name: "audit_repo",
+		script: AUDIT_REPO_SCRIPT
+	},
+	{
+		name: "debug_incident",
+		script: DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT
+	},
+	{
+		name: "multi_perspective_review",
+		script: MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT
+	},
+	{
+		name: "pr_review",
+		script: PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT
+	},
+	{
+		name: "research",
+		script: RESEARCH_SCRIPT
+	}
+]);
+//#endregion
+export { AUDIT_REPO_SCRIPT, BUILTIN_WORKFLOWS, DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT, MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT, PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT, RESEARCH_SCRIPT };
+
+//# sourceMappingURL=index.js.map

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/index.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"index.js","names":[],"sources":["../../../../../src/agent/workflow/builtins/index.ts"],"sourcesContent":["/**\n * Bundled workflow templates. These are shipped with xopc and discoverable\n * via the catalog alongside user workflows in `~/.xopc/workflows/`. A user\n * workflow with the same `name` always wins — built-ins are starting points,\n * not authority.\n */\n\nimport { AUDIT_REPO_SCRIPT } from './audit-repo.js';\nimport { DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT } from './debug-incident.js';\nimport { MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT } from './multi-perspective-review.js';\nimport { PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT } from './pr-review.js';\nimport { RESEARCH_SCRIPT } from './research.js';\n\nexport interface BuiltinWorkflow {\n  name: string;\n  script: string;\n}\n\nexport const BUILTIN_WORKFLOWS: readonly BuiltinWorkflow[] = Object.freeze([\n  { name: 'audit_repo', script: AUDIT_REPO_SCRIPT },\n  { name: 'debug_incident', script: DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT },\n  { name: 'multi_perspective_review', script: MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT },\n  { name: 'pr_review', script: PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT },\n  { name: 'research', script: RESEARCH_SCRIPT },\n]);\n\nexport {\n  AUDIT_REPO_SCRIPT,\n  DEBUG_INCIDENT_SCRIPT,\n  MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT,\n  PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT,\n  RESEARCH_SCRIPT,\n};\n"],"mappings":";;;;;;;;;;;;AAkBA,MAAa,oBAAgD,OAAO,OAAO;CACzE;EAAE,MAAM;EAAc,QAAQ;EAAmB;CACjD;EAAE,MAAM;EAAkB,QAAQ;EAAuB;CACzD;EAAE,MAAM;EAA4B,QAAQ;EAAiC;CAC7E;EAAE,MAAM;EAAa,QAAQ;EAAkB;CAC/C;EAAE,MAAM;EAAY,QAAQ;EAAiB;CAC9C,CAAC"}

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/multi-perspective-review.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/**
+ * Built-in workflow: `multi_perspective_review`
+ *
+ * Reviews a target (file, PR, design doc, plan — passed via args.target) from
+ * several independent perspectives, then asks an adversarial judge to decide
+ * what would actually break in practice. Useful for sanity-checking decisions
+ * before they ship.
+ *
+ * Args:
+ *   - target: what to review
+ *   - lenses: optional array of { name, angle } to override default lenses
+ *   - skipAdversarial: when true, skip the adversarial judge phase
+ */
+export declare const MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT = "export const meta = {\n  name: 'multi_perspective_review',\n  description: 'Review a target from N independent perspectives, then adversarially judge what would actually break.',\n  whenToUse: 'User wants a stress-test of a design, plan, PR, or proposal before committing to it.',\n  tags: ['review', 'planning', 'decision'],\n  estimatedAgents: { min: 5, max: 6 },\n  phases: [\n    { title: 'Lenses' },\n    { title: 'Adversarial' },\n    { title: 'Synthesize' },\n  ],\n}\n\nconst READ_ONLY_TOOLS = ['read_file', 'grep', 'find', 'list_dir']\n\nconst target = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.target\n  ? String(args.target)\n  : 'No explicit target was provided. Treat the currently focused file or recent context as the target.'\n\nconst skipAdversarial = Boolean(args && typeof args === 'object' && args.skipAdversarial)\n\nconst DEFAULT_LENSES = [\n  { name: 'User', angle: 'How a real user experiences this. Friction, confusion, surprise paths, accessibility.' },\n  { name: 'Operator', angle: 'How an on-call engineer experiences this in production. Failure modes, observability, rollback.' },\n  { name: 'Skeptic', angle: 'Hidden assumptions. What is being implied but not stated. What would break under load or weird input.' },\n  { name: 'Maintainer', angle: 'Six-month-later view. Clarity, naming, layering, ease of changing nearby code.' },\n]\n\nlet lenses = DEFAULT_LENSES\nif (args && typeof args === 'object' && Array.isArray(args.lenses) && args.lenses.length) {\n  lenses = args.lenses\n    .filter((l) => l && typeof l === 'object' && l.name && l.angle)\n    .map((l) => ({ name: String(l.name), angle: String(l.angle) }))\n  if (!lenses.length) lenses = DEFAULT_LENSES\n}\n\nphase('Lenses')\nconst lensViews = await parallel(\n  lenses.map((l) => () =>\n    agent(\n      'Review the following target through the ' + l.name + ' lens.\\n' +\n        'Lens focus: ' + l.angle + '\\n\\n' +\n        'TARGET:\\n' + target + '\\n\\n' +\n        'Return 3\u20137 concrete observations. Each entry: title (5\u201310 words), why-it-matters (1 sentence), risk (low/med/high).',\n      {\n        label: l.name + ' lens',\n        toolset: READ_ONLY_TOOLS,\n        schema: {\n          type: 'object',\n          properties: {\n            observations: {\n              type: 'array',\n              items: {\n                type: 'object',\n                properties: {\n                  title: { type: 'string' },\n                  why: { type: 'string' },\n                  risk: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high'] },\n                },\n                required: ['title', 'why', 'risk'],\n              },\n            },\n          },\n          required: ['observations'],\n        },\n      },\n    ),\n  ),\n)\n\nconst valid = lensViews.filter(Boolean)\nconst allObs = valid.flatMap((v, i) =>\n  (v?.observations ?? []).map((o) => ({ lens: lenses[i].name, ...o })),\n)\n\nlet verdict = null\nif (!skipAdversarial) {\n  phase('Adversarial')\n  verdict = await agent(\n    'You are an adversarial judge. Given these multi-lens observations of a target, decide which would actually cause real harm if shipped as-is. ' +\n      'Default to realRisk=false unless an observation has clear, mechanism-level evidence. ' +\n      'Rate evidenceStrength as weak | moderate | strong.\\n\\n' +\n      JSON.stringify(allObs, null, 2),\n    {\n      label: 'adversarial verdict',\n      schema: {\n        type: 'object',\n        properties: {\n          verdicts: {\n            type: 'array',\n            items: {\n              type: 'object',\n              properties: {\n                title: { type: 'string' },\n                lens: { type: 'string' },\n                realRisk: { type: 'boolean' },\n                evidenceStrength: { type: 'string', enum: ['weak', 'moderate', 'strong'] },\n                reason: { type: 'string' },\n              },\n              required: ['title', 'lens', 'realRisk', 'evidenceStrength', 'reason'],\n            },\n          },\n        },\n        required: ['verdicts'],\n      },\n    },\n  )\n}\n\nphase('Synthesize')\nconst confirmed = (verdict?.verdicts ?? []).filter((v) => v.realRisk)\nconst goNoGo = skipAdversarial\n  ? (allObs.some((o) => o.risk === 'high') ? 'fix_first' : 'ship')\n  : confirmed.some((v) => v.evidenceStrength === 'strong')\n    ? 'fix_first'\n    : confirmed.length\n      ? 'fix_first'\n      : 'ship'\n\nreturn {\n  ok: true,\n  target,\n  lenses: lenses.map((l) => l.name),\n  skipAdversarial,\n  observationCount: allObs.length,\n  confirmedRiskCount: confirmed.length,\n  goNoGo,\n  topRisks: confirmed.slice(0, 10),\n  allVerdicts: verdict?.verdicts ?? [],\n}\n";

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/multi-perspective-review.js

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+//#region src/agent/workflow/builtins/multi-perspective-review.ts
+/**
+* Built-in workflow: `multi_perspective_review`
+*
+* Reviews a target (file, PR, design doc, plan — passed via args.target) from
+* several independent perspectives, then asks an adversarial judge to decide
+* what would actually break in practice. Useful for sanity-checking decisions
+* before they ship.
+*
+* Args:
+*   - target: what to review
+*   - lenses: optional array of { name, angle } to override default lenses
+*   - skipAdversarial: when true, skip the adversarial judge phase
+*/
+const MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT = `export const meta = {
+  name: 'multi_perspective_review',
+  description: 'Review a target from N independent perspectives, then adversarially judge what would actually break.',
+  whenToUse: 'User wants a stress-test of a design, plan, PR, or proposal before committing to it.',
+  tags: ['review', 'planning', 'decision'],
+  estimatedAgents: { min: 5, max: 6 },
+  phases: [
+    { title: 'Lenses' },
+    { title: 'Adversarial' },
+    { title: 'Synthesize' },
+  ],
+}
+
+const READ_ONLY_TOOLS = ['read_file', 'grep', 'find', 'list_dir']
+
+const target = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.target
+  ? String(args.target)
+  : 'No explicit target was provided. Treat the currently focused file or recent context as the target.'
+
+const skipAdversarial = Boolean(args && typeof args === 'object' && args.skipAdversarial)
+
+const DEFAULT_LENSES = [
+  { name: 'User', angle: 'How a real user experiences this. Friction, confusion, surprise paths, accessibility.' },
+  { name: 'Operator', angle: 'How an on-call engineer experiences this in production. Failure modes, observability, rollback.' },
+  { name: 'Skeptic', angle: 'Hidden assumptions. What is being implied but not stated. What would break under load or weird input.' },
+  { name: 'Maintainer', angle: 'Six-month-later view. Clarity, naming, layering, ease of changing nearby code.' },
+]
+
+let lenses = DEFAULT_LENSES
+if (args && typeof args === 'object' && Array.isArray(args.lenses) && args.lenses.length) {
+  lenses = args.lenses
+    .filter((l) => l && typeof l === 'object' && l.name && l.angle)
+    .map((l) => ({ name: String(l.name), angle: String(l.angle) }))
+  if (!lenses.length) lenses = DEFAULT_LENSES
+}
+
+phase('Lenses')
+const lensViews = await parallel(
+  lenses.map((l) => () =>
+    agent(
+      'Review the following target through the ' + l.name + ' lens.\\n' +
+        'Lens focus: ' + l.angle + '\\n\\n' +
+        'TARGET:\\n' + target + '\\n\\n' +
+        'Return 3–7 concrete observations. Each entry: title (5–10 words), why-it-matters (1 sentence), risk (low/med/high).',
+      {
+        label: l.name + ' lens',
+        toolset: READ_ONLY_TOOLS,
+        schema: {
+          type: 'object',
+          properties: {
+            observations: {
+              type: 'array',
+              items: {
+                type: 'object',
+                properties: {
+                  title: { type: 'string' },
+                  why: { type: 'string' },
+                  risk: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high'] },
+                },
+                required: ['title', 'why', 'risk'],
+              },
+            },
+          },
+          required: ['observations'],
+        },
+      },
+    ),
+  ),
+)
+
+const valid = lensViews.filter(Boolean)
+const allObs = valid.flatMap((v, i) =>
+  (v?.observations ?? []).map((o) => ({ lens: lenses[i].name, ...o })),
+)
+
+let verdict = null
+if (!skipAdversarial) {
+  phase('Adversarial')
+  verdict = await agent(
+    'You are an adversarial judge. Given these multi-lens observations of a target, decide which would actually cause real harm if shipped as-is. ' +
+      'Default to realRisk=false unless an observation has clear, mechanism-level evidence. ' +
+      'Rate evidenceStrength as weak | moderate | strong.\\n\\n' +
+      JSON.stringify(allObs, null, 2),
+    {
+      label: 'adversarial verdict',
+      schema: {
+        type: 'object',
+        properties: {
+          verdicts: {
+            type: 'array',
+            items: {
+              type: 'object',
+              properties: {
+                title: { type: 'string' },
+                lens: { type: 'string' },
+                realRisk: { type: 'boolean' },
+                evidenceStrength: { type: 'string', enum: ['weak', 'moderate', 'strong'] },
+                reason: { type: 'string' },
+              },
+              required: ['title', 'lens', 'realRisk', 'evidenceStrength', 'reason'],
+            },
+          },
+        },
+        required: ['verdicts'],
+      },
+    },
+  )
+}
+
+phase('Synthesize')
+const confirmed = (verdict?.verdicts ?? []).filter((v) => v.realRisk)
+const goNoGo = skipAdversarial
+  ? (allObs.some((o) => o.risk === 'high') ? 'fix_first' : 'ship')
+  : confirmed.some((v) => v.evidenceStrength === 'strong')
+    ? 'fix_first'
+    : confirmed.length
+      ? 'fix_first'
+      : 'ship'
+
+return {
+  ok: true,
+  target,
+  lenses: lenses.map((l) => l.name),
+  skipAdversarial,
+  observationCount: allObs.length,
+  confirmedRiskCount: confirmed.length,
+  goNoGo,
+  topRisks: confirmed.slice(0, 10),
+  allVerdicts: verdict?.verdicts ?? [],
+}
+`;
+//#endregion
+export { MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT };
+
+//# sourceMappingURL=multi-perspective-review.js.map

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/multi-perspective-review.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"multi-perspective-review.js","names":[],"sources":["../../../../../src/agent/workflow/builtins/multi-perspective-review.ts"],"sourcesContent":["/**\n * Built-in workflow: `multi_perspective_review`\n *\n * Reviews a target (file, PR, design doc, plan — passed via args.target) from\n * several independent perspectives, then asks an adversarial judge to decide\n * what would actually break in practice. Useful for sanity-checking decisions\n * before they ship.\n *\n * Args:\n *   - target: what to review\n *   - lenses: optional array of { name, angle } to override default lenses\n *   - skipAdversarial: when true, skip the adversarial judge phase\n */\n\nexport const MULTI_PERSPECTIVE_REVIEW_SCRIPT = `export const meta = {\n  name: 'multi_perspective_review',\n  description: 'Review a target from N independent perspectives, then adversarially judge what would actually break.',\n  whenToUse: 'User wants a stress-test of a design, plan, PR, or proposal before committing to it.',\n  tags: ['review', 'planning', 'decision'],\n  estimatedAgents: { min: 5, max: 6 },\n  phases: [\n    { title: 'Lenses' },\n    { title: 'Adversarial' },\n    { title: 'Synthesize' },\n  ],\n}\n\nconst READ_ONLY_TOOLS = ['read_file', 'grep', 'find', 'list_dir']\n\nconst target = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.target\n  ? String(args.target)\n  : 'No explicit target was provided. Treat the currently focused file or recent context as the target.'\n\nconst skipAdversarial = Boolean(args && typeof args === 'object' && args.skipAdversarial)\n\nconst DEFAULT_LENSES = [\n  { name: 'User', angle: 'How a real user experiences this. Friction, confusion, surprise paths, accessibility.' },\n  { name: 'Operator', angle: 'How an on-call engineer experiences this in production. Failure modes, observability, rollback.' },\n  { name: 'Skeptic', angle: 'Hidden assumptions. What is being implied but not stated. What would break under load or weird input.' },\n  { name: 'Maintainer', angle: 'Six-month-later view. Clarity, naming, layering, ease of changing nearby code.' },\n]\n\nlet lenses = DEFAULT_LENSES\nif (args && typeof args === 'object' && Array.isArray(args.lenses) && args.lenses.length) {\n  lenses = args.lenses\n    .filter((l) => l && typeof l === 'object' && l.name && l.angle)\n    .map((l) => ({ name: String(l.name), angle: String(l.angle) }))\n  if (!lenses.length) lenses = DEFAULT_LENSES\n}\n\nphase('Lenses')\nconst lensViews = await parallel(\n  lenses.map((l) => () =>\n    agent(\n      'Review the following target through the ' + l.name + ' lens.\\\\n' +\n        'Lens focus: ' + l.angle + '\\\\n\\\\n' +\n        'TARGET:\\\\n' + target + '\\\\n\\\\n' +\n        'Return 3–7 concrete observations. Each entry: title (5–10 words), why-it-matters (1 sentence), risk (low/med/high).',\n      {\n        label: l.name + ' lens',\n        toolset: READ_ONLY_TOOLS,\n        schema: {\n          type: 'object',\n          properties: {\n            observations: {\n              type: 'array',\n              items: {\n                type: 'object',\n                properties: {\n                  title: { type: 'string' },\n                  why: { type: 'string' },\n                  risk: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high'] },\n                },\n                required: ['title', 'why', 'risk'],\n              },\n            },\n          },\n          required: ['observations'],\n        },\n      },\n    ),\n  ),\n)\n\nconst valid = lensViews.filter(Boolean)\nconst allObs = valid.flatMap((v, i) =>\n  (v?.observations ?? []).map((o) => ({ lens: lenses[i].name, ...o })),\n)\n\nlet verdict = null\nif (!skipAdversarial) {\n  phase('Adversarial')\n  verdict = await agent(\n    'You are an adversarial judge. Given these multi-lens observations of a target, decide which would actually cause real harm if shipped as-is. ' +\n      'Default to realRisk=false unless an observation has clear, mechanism-level evidence. ' +\n      'Rate evidenceStrength as weak | moderate | strong.\\\\n\\\\n' +\n      JSON.stringify(allObs, null, 2),\n    {\n      label: 'adversarial verdict',\n      schema: {\n        type: 'object',\n        properties: {\n          verdicts: {\n            type: 'array',\n            items: {\n              type: 'object',\n              properties: {\n                title: { type: 'string' },\n                lens: { type: 'string' },\n                realRisk: { type: 'boolean' },\n                evidenceStrength: { type: 'string', enum: ['weak', 'moderate', 'strong'] },\n                reason: { type: 'string' },\n              },\n              required: ['title', 'lens', 'realRisk', 'evidenceStrength', 'reason'],\n            },\n          },\n        },\n        required: ['verdicts'],\n      },\n    },\n  )\n}\n\nphase('Synthesize')\nconst confirmed = (verdict?.verdicts ?? []).filter((v) => v.realRisk)\nconst goNoGo = skipAdversarial\n  ? (allObs.some((o) => o.risk === 'high') ? 'fix_first' : 'ship')\n  : confirmed.some((v) => v.evidenceStrength === 'strong')\n    ? 'fix_first'\n    : confirmed.length\n      ? 'fix_first'\n      : 'ship'\n\nreturn {\n  ok: true,\n  target,\n  lenses: lenses.map((l) => l.name),\n  skipAdversarial,\n  observationCount: allObs.length,\n  confirmedRiskCount: confirmed.length,\n  goNoGo,\n  topRisks: confirmed.slice(0, 10),\n  allVerdicts: verdict?.verdicts ?? [],\n}\n`\n"],"mappings":";;;;;;;;;;;;;;AAcA,MAAa,kCAAkC"}

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/pr-review.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/**
+ * Built-in workflow: `pr_review`
+ *
+ * Focused review of a PR, diff, or commit range — lighter than full repo audit.
+ * Parallel reviewers cover correctness, security, tests, API compat, and perf;
+ * final phase produces a ship/block verdict with blockers vs suggestions.
+ *
+ * Args:
+ *   - target: PR description, diff, commit range, or file list
+ *   - diff: alias for target
+ */
+export declare const PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT = "export const meta = {\n  name: 'pr_review',\n  description: 'Review a PR/diff/commit range with parallel focused reviewers and a ship/block verdict.',\n  whenToUse: 'User asks to review a PR, diff, specific changes, or commit range (not the whole repo).',\n  tags: ['code-review', 'pr'],\n  estimatedAgents: { min: 7, max: 7 },\n  phases: [\n    { title: 'Scope' },\n    { title: 'Review' },\n    { title: 'Verdict' },\n  ],\n}\n\nconst READ_ONLY_TOOLS = ['read_file', 'grep', 'find', 'list_dir', 'shell']\n\nconst target = args && typeof args === 'object'\n  ? String(args.target ?? args.diff ?? '')\n  : ''\nconst reviewTarget = target.trim()\n  ? target\n  : 'Recent changes in the working tree or the diff/context from the current conversation.'\n\nconst REVIEWERS = [\n  { key: 'correctness', focus: 'Logic bugs, edge cases, error handling, null safety, race conditions in changed code.' },\n  { key: 'security', focus: 'Auth/authz regressions, input validation, secret exposure, injection, unsafe deserialization in the diff.' },\n  { key: 'tests', focus: 'Missing tests for changed behavior, brittle assertions, untested edge cases introduced by this change.' },\n  { key: 'api_compat', focus: 'Breaking public API changes, schema migrations, backward compatibility, deprecation handling.' },\n  { key: 'perf', focus: 'Regressions in hot paths, accidental N+1, sync I/O, unbounded loops or allocations in changed code.' },\n]\n\nphase('Scope')\nconst scope = await agent(\n  'Identify what changed for this review target. List changed files, blast radius (what depends on them), and the apparent intent of the change. Be concise.\\n\\nTARGET:\\n' +\n    reviewTarget,\n  {\n    label: 'change scope',\n    toolset: READ_ONLY_TOOLS,\n    schema: {\n      type: 'object',\n      properties: {\n        changedFiles: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },\n        intent: { type: 'string' },\n        blastRadius: { type: 'string' },\n      },\n      required: ['changedFiles', 'intent'],\n    },\n  },\n)\n\nphase('Review')\nconst reviews = await parallel(\n  REVIEWERS.map((r) => () =>\n    agent(\n      'Review these changes through the ' + r.key + ' lens.\\n' +\n        'Focus: ' + r.focus + '\\n\\n' +\n        'TARGET:\\n' + reviewTarget + '\\n\\n' +\n        'SCOPE:\\n' + JSON.stringify(scope, null, 2) + '\\n\\n' +\n        'Return findings: file, severity (low/med/high/blocker), title, fix suggestion. Blocker = must fix before merge.',\n      {\n        label: r.key,\n        toolset: READ_ONLY_TOOLS,\n        schema: {\n          type: 'object',\n          properties: {\n            findings: {\n              type: 'array',\n              items: {\n                type: 'object',\n                properties: {\n                  file: { type: 'string' },\n                  severity: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high', 'blocker'] },\n                  title: { type: 'string' },\n                  fix: { type: 'string' },\n                },\n                required: ['file', 'severity', 'title', 'fix'],\n              },\n            },\n          },\n          required: ['findings'],\n        },\n      },\n    ),\n  ),\n)\n\nphase('Verdict')\nconst live = reviews.filter(Boolean)\nconst byReviewer = {}\nfor (let i = 0; i < REVIEWERS.length; i++) {\n  byReviewer[REVIEWERS[i].key] = live[i]?.findings ?? []\n}\n\nconst verdict = await agent(\n  'Synthesize a PR review verdict. Separate blockers from suggestions. Deduplicate. Recommend ship | fix_first | block.\\n\\n' +\n    JSON.stringify(byReviewer, null, 2),\n  {\n    label: 'verdict',\n    schema: {\n      type: 'object',\n      properties: {\n        recommendation: { type: 'string', enum: ['ship', 'fix_first', 'block'] },\n        summary: { type: 'string' },\n        blockers: {\n          type: 'array',\n          items: {\n            type: 'object',\n            properties: {\n              file: { type: 'string' },\n              title: { type: 'string' },\n              fix: { type: 'string' },\n            },\n            required: ['file', 'title'],\n          },\n        },\n        suggestions: {\n          type: 'array',\n          items: {\n            type: 'object',\n            properties: {\n              file: { type: 'string' },\n              severity: { type: 'string' },\n              title: { type: 'string' },\n            },\n            required: ['file', 'title'],\n          },\n        },\n      },\n      required: ['recommendation', 'summary', 'blockers'],\n    },\n  },\n)\n\nreturn {\n  ok: true,\n  target: reviewTarget,\n  scope,\n  ...(verdict ?? { recommendation: 'fix_first', summary: 'verdict failed', blockers: [], suggestions: [] }),\n  byReviewer,\n}\n";

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/pr-review.js

@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+//#region src/agent/workflow/builtins/pr-review.ts
+/**
+* Built-in workflow: `pr_review`
+*
+* Focused review of a PR, diff, or commit range — lighter than full repo audit.
+* Parallel reviewers cover correctness, security, tests, API compat, and perf;
+* final phase produces a ship/block verdict with blockers vs suggestions.
+*
+* Args:
+*   - target: PR description, diff, commit range, or file list
+*   - diff: alias for target
+*/
+const PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT = `export const meta = {
+  name: 'pr_review',
+  description: 'Review a PR/diff/commit range with parallel focused reviewers and a ship/block verdict.',
+  whenToUse: 'User asks to review a PR, diff, specific changes, or commit range (not the whole repo).',
+  tags: ['code-review', 'pr'],
+  estimatedAgents: { min: 7, max: 7 },
+  phases: [
+    { title: 'Scope' },
+    { title: 'Review' },
+    { title: 'Verdict' },
+  ],
+}
+
+const READ_ONLY_TOOLS = ['read_file', 'grep', 'find', 'list_dir', 'shell']
+
+const target = args && typeof args === 'object'
+  ? String(args.target ?? args.diff ?? '')
+  : ''
+const reviewTarget = target.trim()
+  ? target
+  : 'Recent changes in the working tree or the diff/context from the current conversation.'
+
+const REVIEWERS = [
+  { key: 'correctness', focus: 'Logic bugs, edge cases, error handling, null safety, race conditions in changed code.' },
+  { key: 'security', focus: 'Auth/authz regressions, input validation, secret exposure, injection, unsafe deserialization in the diff.' },
+  { key: 'tests', focus: 'Missing tests for changed behavior, brittle assertions, untested edge cases introduced by this change.' },
+  { key: 'api_compat', focus: 'Breaking public API changes, schema migrations, backward compatibility, deprecation handling.' },
+  { key: 'perf', focus: 'Regressions in hot paths, accidental N+1, sync I/O, unbounded loops or allocations in changed code.' },
+]
+
+phase('Scope')
+const scope = await agent(
+  'Identify what changed for this review target. List changed files, blast radius (what depends on them), and the apparent intent of the change. Be concise.\\n\\nTARGET:\\n' +
+    reviewTarget,
+  {
+    label: 'change scope',
+    toolset: READ_ONLY_TOOLS,
+    schema: {
+      type: 'object',
+      properties: {
+        changedFiles: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },
+        intent: { type: 'string' },
+        blastRadius: { type: 'string' },
+      },
+      required: ['changedFiles', 'intent'],
+    },
+  },
+)
+
+phase('Review')
+const reviews = await parallel(
+  REVIEWERS.map((r) => () =>
+    agent(
+      'Review these changes through the ' + r.key + ' lens.\\n' +
+        'Focus: ' + r.focus + '\\n\\n' +
+        'TARGET:\\n' + reviewTarget + '\\n\\n' +
+        'SCOPE:\\n' + JSON.stringify(scope, null, 2) + '\\n\\n' +
+        'Return findings: file, severity (low/med/high/blocker), title, fix suggestion. Blocker = must fix before merge.',
+      {
+        label: r.key,
+        toolset: READ_ONLY_TOOLS,
+        schema: {
+          type: 'object',
+          properties: {
+            findings: {
+              type: 'array',
+              items: {
+                type: 'object',
+                properties: {
+                  file: { type: 'string' },
+                  severity: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high', 'blocker'] },
+                  title: { type: 'string' },
+                  fix: { type: 'string' },
+                },
+                required: ['file', 'severity', 'title', 'fix'],
+              },
+            },
+          },
+          required: ['findings'],
+        },
+      },
+    ),
+  ),
+)
+
+phase('Verdict')
+const live = reviews.filter(Boolean)
+const byReviewer = {}
+for (let i = 0; i < REVIEWERS.length; i++) {
+  byReviewer[REVIEWERS[i].key] = live[i]?.findings ?? []
+}
+
+const verdict = await agent(
+  'Synthesize a PR review verdict. Separate blockers from suggestions. Deduplicate. Recommend ship | fix_first | block.\\n\\n' +
+    JSON.stringify(byReviewer, null, 2),
+  {
+    label: 'verdict',
+    schema: {
+      type: 'object',
+      properties: {
+        recommendation: { type: 'string', enum: ['ship', 'fix_first', 'block'] },
+        summary: { type: 'string' },
+        blockers: {
+          type: 'array',
+          items: {
+            type: 'object',
+            properties: {
+              file: { type: 'string' },
+              title: { type: 'string' },
+              fix: { type: 'string' },
+            },
+            required: ['file', 'title'],
+          },
+        },
+        suggestions: {
+          type: 'array',
+          items: {
+            type: 'object',
+            properties: {
+              file: { type: 'string' },
+              severity: { type: 'string' },
+              title: { type: 'string' },
+            },
+            required: ['file', 'title'],
+          },
+        },
+      },
+      required: ['recommendation', 'summary', 'blockers'],
+    },
+  },
+)
+
+return {
+  ok: true,
+  target: reviewTarget,
+  scope,
+  ...(verdict ?? { recommendation: 'fix_first', summary: 'verdict failed', blockers: [], suggestions: [] }),
+  byReviewer,
+}
+`;
+//#endregion
+export { PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT };
+
+//# sourceMappingURL=pr-review.js.map

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/pr-review.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"pr-review.js","names":[],"sources":["../../../../../src/agent/workflow/builtins/pr-review.ts"],"sourcesContent":["/**\n * Built-in workflow: `pr_review`\n *\n * Focused review of a PR, diff, or commit range — lighter than full repo audit.\n * Parallel reviewers cover correctness, security, tests, API compat, and perf;\n * final phase produces a ship/block verdict with blockers vs suggestions.\n *\n * Args:\n *   - target: PR description, diff, commit range, or file list\n *   - diff: alias for target\n */\n\nexport const PR_REVIEW_SCRIPT = `export const meta = {\n  name: 'pr_review',\n  description: 'Review a PR/diff/commit range with parallel focused reviewers and a ship/block verdict.',\n  whenToUse: 'User asks to review a PR, diff, specific changes, or commit range (not the whole repo).',\n  tags: ['code-review', 'pr'],\n  estimatedAgents: { min: 7, max: 7 },\n  phases: [\n    { title: 'Scope' },\n    { title: 'Review' },\n    { title: 'Verdict' },\n  ],\n}\n\nconst READ_ONLY_TOOLS = ['read_file', 'grep', 'find', 'list_dir', 'shell']\n\nconst target = args && typeof args === 'object'\n  ? String(args.target ?? args.diff ?? '')\n  : ''\nconst reviewTarget = target.trim()\n  ? target\n  : 'Recent changes in the working tree or the diff/context from the current conversation.'\n\nconst REVIEWERS = [\n  { key: 'correctness', focus: 'Logic bugs, edge cases, error handling, null safety, race conditions in changed code.' },\n  { key: 'security', focus: 'Auth/authz regressions, input validation, secret exposure, injection, unsafe deserialization in the diff.' },\n  { key: 'tests', focus: 'Missing tests for changed behavior, brittle assertions, untested edge cases introduced by this change.' },\n  { key: 'api_compat', focus: 'Breaking public API changes, schema migrations, backward compatibility, deprecation handling.' },\n  { key: 'perf', focus: 'Regressions in hot paths, accidental N+1, sync I/O, unbounded loops or allocations in changed code.' },\n]\n\nphase('Scope')\nconst scope = await agent(\n  'Identify what changed for this review target. List changed files, blast radius (what depends on them), and the apparent intent of the change. Be concise.\\\\n\\\\nTARGET:\\\\n' +\n    reviewTarget,\n  {\n    label: 'change scope',\n    toolset: READ_ONLY_TOOLS,\n    schema: {\n      type: 'object',\n      properties: {\n        changedFiles: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },\n        intent: { type: 'string' },\n        blastRadius: { type: 'string' },\n      },\n      required: ['changedFiles', 'intent'],\n    },\n  },\n)\n\nphase('Review')\nconst reviews = await parallel(\n  REVIEWERS.map((r) => () =>\n    agent(\n      'Review these changes through the ' + r.key + ' lens.\\\\n' +\n        'Focus: ' + r.focus + '\\\\n\\\\n' +\n        'TARGET:\\\\n' + reviewTarget + '\\\\n\\\\n' +\n        'SCOPE:\\\\n' + JSON.stringify(scope, null, 2) + '\\\\n\\\\n' +\n        'Return findings: file, severity (low/med/high/blocker), title, fix suggestion. Blocker = must fix before merge.',\n      {\n        label: r.key,\n        toolset: READ_ONLY_TOOLS,\n        schema: {\n          type: 'object',\n          properties: {\n            findings: {\n              type: 'array',\n              items: {\n                type: 'object',\n                properties: {\n                  file: { type: 'string' },\n                  severity: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high', 'blocker'] },\n                  title: { type: 'string' },\n                  fix: { type: 'string' },\n                },\n                required: ['file', 'severity', 'title', 'fix'],\n              },\n            },\n          },\n          required: ['findings'],\n        },\n      },\n    ),\n  ),\n)\n\nphase('Verdict')\nconst live = reviews.filter(Boolean)\nconst byReviewer = {}\nfor (let i = 0; i < REVIEWERS.length; i++) {\n  byReviewer[REVIEWERS[i].key] = live[i]?.findings ?? []\n}\n\nconst verdict = await agent(\n  'Synthesize a PR review verdict. Separate blockers from suggestions. Deduplicate. Recommend ship | fix_first | block.\\\\n\\\\n' +\n    JSON.stringify(byReviewer, null, 2),\n  {\n    label: 'verdict',\n    schema: {\n      type: 'object',\n      properties: {\n        recommendation: { type: 'string', enum: ['ship', 'fix_first', 'block'] },\n        summary: { type: 'string' },\n        blockers: {\n          type: 'array',\n          items: {\n            type: 'object',\n            properties: {\n              file: { type: 'string' },\n              title: { type: 'string' },\n              fix: { type: 'string' },\n            },\n            required: ['file', 'title'],\n          },\n        },\n        suggestions: {\n          type: 'array',\n          items: {\n            type: 'object',\n            properties: {\n              file: { type: 'string' },\n              severity: { type: 'string' },\n              title: { type: 'string' },\n            },\n            required: ['file', 'title'],\n          },\n        },\n      },\n      required: ['recommendation', 'summary', 'blockers'],\n    },\n  },\n)\n\nreturn {\n  ok: true,\n  target: reviewTarget,\n  scope,\n  ...(verdict ?? { recommendation: 'fix_first', summary: 'verdict failed', blockers: [], suggestions: [] }),\n  byReviewer,\n}\n`\n"],"mappings":";;;;;;;;;;;;AAYA,MAAa,mBAAmB"}

package/dist/src/agent/workflow/builtins/research.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/**
+ * Built-in workflow: `research`
+ *
+ * Multi-modal research sweep on a question (args.question). Fans out search /
+ * exploration / source-reading angles in parallel, then synthesises a cited
+ * report. Each angle is its own subagent so source reading does not pollute the
+ * parent context.
+ *
+ * Args:
+ *   - question: research question
+ *   - depth: 'quick' (2 angles) | 'standard' (4) | 'deep' (6)
+ */
+export declare const RESEARCH_SCRIPT = "export const meta = {\n  name: 'research',\n  description: 'Multi-angle research on a question with parallel exploration and a cited synthesis.',\n  whenToUse: 'User asks a non-trivial research question that benefits from multiple search angles or source reads.',\n  tags: ['research', 'investigation'],\n  estimatedAgents: { min: 4, max: 8 },\n  phases: [\n    { title: 'Frame' },\n    { title: 'Sweep' },\n    { title: 'Synthesize' },\n  ],\n}\n\nconst RESEARCH_TOOLS = ['web_search', 'web_fetch', 'read_file', 'grep', 'find', 'list_dir']\n\nconst question = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.question\n  ? String(args.question)\n  : 'No explicit question supplied; infer from the most recent user turn.'\n\nconst depth = args && typeof args === 'object' && args.depth\n  ? String(args.depth)\n  : 'standard'\nconst maxAngles = depth === 'quick' ? 2 : depth === 'deep' ? 6 : 4\n\nphase('Frame')\nconst frame = await agent(\n  'Frame this research question. Return exactly ' + maxAngles + ' distinct angles worth investigating, ' +\n    'each with the single most decisive sub-question. Be concrete.\\n\\nQUESTION:\\n' +\n    question,\n  {\n    label: 'framing',\n    schema: {\n      type: 'object',\n      properties: {\n        angles: {\n          type: 'array',\n          items: {\n            type: 'object',\n            properties: {\n              title: { type: 'string' },\n              key_question: { type: 'string' },\n            },\n            required: ['title', 'key_question'],\n          },\n        },\n      },\n      required: ['angles'],\n    },\n  },\n)\n\nif (!frame || !frame.angles?.length) {\n  return { ok: false, reason: 'framing failed', question, depth }\n}\n\nconst angles = frame.angles.slice(0, maxAngles)\n\nphase('Sweep')\nconst angleReports = await parallel(\n  angles.map((a) => () =>\n    agent(\n      'Investigate this angle. Use search and source-read tools liberally. Distinguish what you can confirm from what is conjecture.\\n\\n' +\n        'ANGLE: ' + a.title + '\\n' +\n        'KEY QUESTION: ' + a.key_question + '\\n\\n' +\n        'Return: 3\u20136 grounded findings (each with a 1-line claim and a source URL or file path), plus the strongest counter-evidence.',\n      {\n        label: a.title,\n        toolset: RESEARCH_TOOLS,\n        maxIterations: depth === 'deep' ? 40 : 30,\n        schema: {\n          type: 'object',\n          properties: {\n            findings: {\n              type: 'array',\n              items: {\n                type: 'object',\n                properties: {\n                  claim: { type: 'string' },\n                  source: { type: 'string' },\n                  confidence: { type: 'string', enum: ['low', 'med', 'high'] },\n                },\n                required: ['claim', 'source', 'confidence'],\n              },\n            },\n            counterEvidence: { type: 'string' },\n          },\n          required: ['findings'],\n        },\n      },\n    ),\n  ),\n)\n\nphase('Synthesize')\nconst live = angleReports.filter(Boolean)\nconst synthesis = await agent(\n  'Synthesize a cited research report from these angle-level findings. Drop unsupported or duplicate claims. Use the highest-confidence source per claim. ' +\n    'Explicitly list contradictions where angles disagree. Return: an executive summary (max 5 sentences), top findings with inline source URLs, open questions, and contradictions.\\n\\n' +\n    'QUESTION:\\n' + question + '\\n\\n' +\n    JSON.stringify({ angles, reports: live }, null, 2),\n  {\n    label: 'synthesis',\n    schema: {\n      type: 'object',\n      properties: {\n        executiveSummary: { type: 'string' },\n        topFindings: {\n          type: 'array',\n          items: {\n            type: 'object',\n            properties: {\n              claim: { type: 'string' },\n              source: { type: 'string' },\n            },\n            required: ['claim', 'source'],\n          },\n        },\n        openQuestions: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },\n        contradictions: {\n          type: 'array',\n          items: {\n            type: 'object',\n            properties: {\n              topic: { type: 'string' },\n              sides: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },\n            },\n            required: ['topic', 'sides'],\n          },\n        },\n      },\n      required: ['executiveSummary', 'topFindings'],\n    },\n  },\n)\n\nreturn {\n  ok: true,\n  question,\n  depth,\n  angleCount: angles.length,\n  ...(synthesis ?? { executiveSummary: 'synthesis failed', topFindings: [], contradictions: [] }),\n}\n";