@xiaobuyu/nodesign 0.0.1 → 0.0.3

package/server/engine/mcp/tools/explain-style.js

@@ -1,237 +1,237 @@
-/**
- * mcp/tools/explain-style.js — explain_style（2026-08-18）
- *
- * ## 这个洞是什么
- *
- * `get_computed_styles` 告诉你**结果**（marginBottom: 0px），不告诉你**为什么**。
- * 浏览器 devtools 的 Styles 面板会把败下阵的声明划掉，一眼就看得出是谁赢了 ——
- * agent 手里恰恰没有 devtools。
- *
- * 真实案例：用户圈出"这里太挤了、很贴底边"。真因是 `.wrap { margin: 0 auto }`
- * 这条**简写** —— 类选择器优先级高于 `main > section { margin-bottom: 108px }`，
- * 把所有带 .wrap 的节的下边距清成了 0，全站每一节都在吃这个亏。
- * 定位过程：computed 报 0px（对的，但只告诉结果）→ 怀疑外边距塌陷 → 怀疑媒体
- * 查询 → 怀疑变量没解析 → grep 整个 CSS → 都排除后才想到是简写覆盖。
- * **五六轮工具调用，而 devtools 里这是一眼的事。**
- *
- * 这类 bug 在"一份手写 CSS + 后加的工具类"的站点上非常常见 —— 也就是这个平台上
- * 绝大多数站点。
- *
- * ## 实现
- *
- * 走 CDP 的 `CSS.getMatchedStylesForNode`：它按级联次序返回命中该元素的全部规则，
- * 我们从里面挑出跟目标属性有关的声明（**含简写展开**），标出谁赢、谁被压掉、
- * 各自来自哪条规则。
- */
-
-import { tool } from '@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk';
-import { z } from 'zod';
-import { resolveCanvasTarget, CANVAS_PATH_DESC, requireBrowsable } from '../../../lib/artifact-target.js';
-import { degradedNote, SITE_DEVICE_W } from './helpers/perception-page.js';
-import { acquireArtifactPage, LIVE_PARAM_DESC } from './helpers/acquire-page.js';
-
-/** 简写 → 它能设置的长手属性（只列常踩的那些，够覆盖真实事故） */
-const SHORTHAND_OF = {
-  margin: ['margin-top', 'margin-right', 'margin-bottom', 'margin-left'],
-  padding: ['padding-top', 'padding-right', 'padding-bottom', 'padding-left'],
-  inset: ['top', 'right', 'bottom', 'left'],
-  border: ['border-width', 'border-style', 'border-color'],
-  'border-width': ['border-top-width', 'border-right-width', 'border-bottom-width', 'border-left-width'],
-  'border-radius': ['border-top-left-radius', 'border-top-right-radius', 'border-bottom-right-radius', 'border-bottom-left-radius'],
-  background: ['background-color', 'background-image', 'background-position', 'background-size', 'background-repeat'],
-  font: ['font-family', 'font-size', 'font-weight', 'font-style', 'line-height'],
-  flex: ['flex-grow', 'flex-shrink', 'flex-basis'],
-  gap: ['row-gap', 'column-gap'],
-  overflow: ['overflow-x', 'overflow-y'],
-  transition: ['transition-property', 'transition-duration', 'transition-timing-function', 'transition-delay'],
-  animation: ['animation-name', 'animation-duration', 'animation-timing-function'],
-  'grid-template': ['grid-template-rows', 'grid-template-columns'],
-  'place-items': ['align-items', 'justify-items'],
-  'place-content': ['align-content', 'justify-content'],
-};
-
-/** 一条声明是否影响目标属性：直接同名，或者是能设置它的简写 */
-function affects(declName, prop) {
-  if (declName === prop) return { hit: true, viaShorthand: null };
-  const longhands = SHORTHAND_OF[declName];
-  if (longhands && longhands.includes(prop)) return { hit: true, viaShorthand: declName };
-  return { hit: false };
-}
-
-export function makeExplainStyleTool({ workspaceRoot, projectId, sessionId }) {
-  return tool(
-    'explain_style',
-    `Explain WHY one CSS property has the value it has: every declaration that
-matched the element, in cascade order, with the winner marked and the losers
-listed — including declarations that came from a SHORTHAND.
-
-get_computed_styles gives you the result; this gives you the reason. Reach for it
-the moment a value is not what your CSS says it should be, instead of guessing
-through margin collapse / media queries / unresolved variables one at a time.
-
-The case this was built for: a section's margin-bottom computed to 0px even
-though the stylesheet said 108px. Cause was ".wrap { margin: 0 auto }" — a
-shorthand on a class selector, higher specificity than "main > section", zeroing
-the bottom margin of every .wrap section on the site. Five or six tool calls to
-find by elimination; one call here.
-
-Note it reports the FIRST element matching the selector.`,
-    {
-      selector: z.string().min(1)
-        .describe('CSS selector — the first match is explained. Plain CSS only (no :has-text, >>, nth=).'),
-      property: z.string().min(1)
-        .describe('The CSS property to explain, e.g. "margin-bottom", "color", "display". Use the longhand name when you can — asking about "margin" tells you less than asking about "margin-bottom".'),
-      path: z.string().optional().describe(CANVAS_PATH_DESC),
-      device: z.enum(['desktop', 'tablet', 'mobile']).optional()
-        .describe('Viewport width, so media queries resolve the way they do at that breakpoint (default desktop 1440).'),
-      live: z.boolean().optional().describe(LIVE_PARAM_DESC),
-    },
-    async ({ selector, property, path: relPath, device, live }) => {
-      const asText = (text, isError = false) => ({ content: [{ type: 'text', text }], ...(isError ? { isError: true } : {}) });
-      const target = await resolveCanvasTarget(workspaceRoot, relPath, sessionId);
-      if (!target) return asText('No page found.', true);
-      const guard = requireBrowsable(target);
-      if (guard) return asText(guard, true);
-
-      const W = SITE_DEVICE_W[device || 'desktop'];
-      const prop = property.trim().toLowerCase();
-
-      let acq;
-      try {
-        acq = await acquireArtifactPage({ projectId, workspaceRoot, target, live, viewport: { width: W, height: 900 } });
-        const page = acq.page;
-        const opened = acq;
-
-        const computed = await page.evaluate(([sel, p]) => {
-          const el = document.querySelector(sel);
-          if (!el) return null;
-          return getComputedStyle(el).getPropertyValue(p);
-        }, [selector, prop]);
-        if (computed === null) return asText(`Selector matched no elements: ${selector}`, true);
-
-        const cdp = await page.context().newCDPSession(page);
-        // styleSheetId → 文件名。同一个 selector 出现在两个文件里时（reset + 组件，
-        // 最常见的那种），光打 `.card` 两行人分不出谁是谁。**必须在 CSS.enable
-        // 之前挂监听** —— 已有的样式表是在 enable 的那一刻补发的。
-        const sheetName = new Map();
-        cdp.on('CSS.styleSheetAdded', (ev) => {
-          // ⚠️ `isInline` 要**先**判：`<style>` 块的 sourceURL 是文档自己的地址，
-          // 按 URL 取名会打出 `page.html?nd=raw` 这种（连我们内部的 raw 参数都漏给
-          // agent 看），而它其实是"页面里那段 <style>"
-          const url = ev?.header?.sourceURL || '';
-          const name = ev?.header?.isInline ? '<style> 内联'
-            : (url ? decodeURIComponent((url.split('?')[0] || url).split('/').pop() || url) : '');
-          if (ev?.header?.styleSheetId) sheetName.set(ev.header.styleSheetId, name);
-        });
-        await cdp.send('DOM.enable');
-        await cdp.send('CSS.enable');
-        const { root } = await cdp.send('DOM.getDocument', { depth: -1 });
-        const { nodeId } = await cdp.send('DOM.querySelector', { nodeId: root.nodeId, selector });
-        if (!nodeId) return asText(`Selector matched no elements: ${selector}`, true);
-        const matched = await cdp.send('CSS.getMatchedStylesForNode', { nodeId });
-
-        // 收集：CDP 的 matchedCSSRules 按**优先级递增**排（最后一条最强）
-        const rows = [];
-        const push = (where, style, extra = {}) => {
-          for (const d of style?.cssProperties ?? []) {
-            if (d.disabled) continue;
-            const a = affects(String(d.name).toLowerCase(), prop);
-            if (!a.hit) continue;
-            // ⚠️ CDP 这一版的 `d.value` **本身就带着** `!important`，再拼一次会打出
-            // `color: red !important !important` —— 看起来像源码里真写了两遍
-            const val = String(d.value).replace(/\s*!\s*important\s*$/i, '');
-            rows.push({
-              where,
-              decl: `${d.name}: ${val}${d.important ? ' !important' : ''}`,
-              important: !!d.important,
-              viaShorthand: a.viaShorthand,
-              ...extra,
-            });
-          }
-        };
-
-        let ruleIdx = 0;
-        for (const m of matched.matchedCSSRules ?? []) {
-          const sel = m.rule?.selectorList?.text ?? '?';
-          const sheet = m.rule?.origin === 'user-agent' ? 'browser default'
-            : (matched.cssKeyframesRules ? null : null);
-          const media = (m.rule?.media ?? []).map(x => x.text).filter(Boolean).join(' and ');
-          const from = sheet || sheetName.get(m.rule?.styleSheetId) || '';
-          push(`${sel}${media ? ` @media ${media}` : ''}${from ? ` [${from}]` : ''}`, m.rule?.style, {
-            origin: m.rule?.origin,
-            ruleIdx: ruleIdx++,   // ⭐ 合并键，见下面那段注释
-          });
-        }
-        if (matched.inlineStyle) push('element inline style="…"', matched.inlineStyle, { inline: true, ruleIdx: 'inline' });
-
-        // 合并同一条规则里的重复条目。CDP 会把简写和它展开出来的长手**都**列一遍
-        // （`.wrap { margin: 0 auto }` 出两条：`margin: 0 auto` + `margin-bottom: 0px`），
-        // 直接打印就是四行里两行是同一件事。留长手那条（它给的是真正生效的值），
-        // 把"来自哪个简写"作为标注挂上去。
-        //
-        // ⛔ 合并键必须是**规则本身**（ruleIdx），不能是 selector 文本。审查实测：
-        // `reset.css` 里 `.card{color:red!important}` 加 `component.css` 里
-        // `.card{color:blue}` —— 两条不同规则碰巧同 selector，按文本合并会折成一条，
-        // `same.decl = r.decl` 留下后者的值（蓝）、`same.important ||=` 又把 red 的
-        // important 标志过继给它，于是工具报「蓝赢」而浏览器画的是红，**真正的赢家
-        // 一行都没出现**。正好命中它的目标人群：手写 CSS 上面又叠了 reset/工具类。
-        const merged = [];
-        for (const r of rows) {
-          const same = merged.find(x => x.ruleIdx === r.ruleIdx);
-          if (!same) { merged.push({ ...r }); continue; }
-          const rIsLonghand = !r.viaShorthand;
-          if (rIsLonghand) {
-            same.decl = r.decl;                      // 长手的值才是生效值
-            same.important = same.important || r.important;
-          } else if (!same.viaShorthand) {
-            same.viaShorthand = r.viaShorthand;      // 把简写来历补到长手那条上
-          }
-          if (r.viaShorthand) same.viaShorthand = r.viaShorthand;
-        }
-        rows.length = 0;
-        rows.push(...merged);
-
-        if (!rows.length) {
-          return asText([
-            `${selector} → ${prop} computes to "${computed}"`,
-            '',
-            'No declaration anywhere sets this property (directly or via a shorthand).',
-            'So the value is inherited or the property\'s initial value — if that surprises you,',
-            'the property you wrote is probably not the one you think controls this.',
-          ].join('\n'));
-        }
-
-        // 赢家：!important 的最后一条 > 普通的最后一条（inline 已经排在最后）
-        const importants = rows.filter(r => r.important);
-        const winner = importants.length ? importants[importants.length - 1] : rows[rows.length - 1];
-
-        const degraded = degradedNote(opened);   // 契约：note 非空必须写进返回文本
-        const lines = [
-          ...(degraded ? [degraded, ''] : []),
-          ...(acq.liveNote ? [acq.liveNote, ''] : []),
-          `${selector} → ${prop} computes to "${computed}"  (viewport ${acq.live ? acq.viewport.width : W}px)`,
-          '',
-          'Declarations that matched, weakest first:',
-        ];
-        for (const r of rows) {
-          const mark = r === winner ? '✅ WINS  ' : '   lost  ';
-          const via = r.viaShorthand
-            ? `   ⭐ via the "${r.viaShorthand}" SHORTHAND — it sets ${prop} even though it does not name it`
-            : '';
-          lines.push(`${mark}${r.decl}\n         from  ${r.where}${via}`);
-        }
-        if (winner.viaShorthand) {
-          lines.push('', `⭐ The winning declaration is a shorthand ("${winner.viaShorthand}"). This is the`
-            + ' single most missable cause of "my CSS says X but the page shows Y": a shorthand on a'
-            + ' higher-specificity selector silently resets longhands you set elsewhere. Fix by using'
-            + ` the longhand there, or by setting ${prop} again after it.`);
-        }
-        return asText(lines.join('\n'));
-      } catch (err) {
-        return asText(`explain_style failed: ${err?.message || String(err)}`, true);
-      } finally {
-        await acq?.release?.();   // 一次性：关浏览器；live：松会话锁
-      }
-    },
-  );
-}
+/**
+ * mcp/tools/explain-style.js — explain_style（2026-08-18）
+ *
+ * ## 这个洞是什么
+ *
+ * `get_computed_styles` 告诉你**结果**（marginBottom: 0px），不告诉你**为什么**。
+ * 浏览器 devtools 的 Styles 面板会把败下阵的声明划掉，一眼就看得出是谁赢了 ——
+ * agent 手里恰恰没有 devtools。
+ *
+ * 真实案例：用户圈出"这里太挤了、很贴底边"。真因是 `.wrap { margin: 0 auto }`
+ * 这条**简写** —— 类选择器优先级高于 `main > section { margin-bottom: 108px }`，
+ * 把所有带 .wrap 的节的下边距清成了 0，全站每一节都在吃这个亏。
+ * 定位过程：computed 报 0px（对的，但只告诉结果）→ 怀疑外边距塌陷 → 怀疑媒体
+ * 查询 → 怀疑变量没解析 → grep 整个 CSS → 都排除后才想到是简写覆盖。
+ * **五六轮工具调用，而 devtools 里这是一眼的事。**
+ *
+ * 这类 bug 在"一份手写 CSS + 后加的工具类"的站点上非常常见 —— 也就是这个平台上
+ * 绝大多数站点。
+ *
+ * ## 实现
+ *
+ * 走 CDP 的 `CSS.getMatchedStylesForNode`：它按级联次序返回命中该元素的全部规则，
+ * 我们从里面挑出跟目标属性有关的声明（**含简写展开**），标出谁赢、谁被压掉、
+ * 各自来自哪条规则。
+ */
+
+import { tool } from '@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk';
+import { z } from 'zod';
+import { resolveCanvasTarget, CANVAS_PATH_DESC, requireBrowsable } from '../../../lib/artifact-target.js';
+import { degradedNote, SITE_DEVICE_W } from './helpers/perception-page.js';
+import { acquireArtifactPage, LIVE_PARAM_DESC } from './helpers/acquire-page.js';
+
+/** 简写 → 它能设置的长手属性（只列常踩的那些，够覆盖真实事故） */
+const SHORTHAND_OF = {
+  margin: ['margin-top', 'margin-right', 'margin-bottom', 'margin-left'],
+  padding: ['padding-top', 'padding-right', 'padding-bottom', 'padding-left'],
+  inset: ['top', 'right', 'bottom', 'left'],
+  border: ['border-width', 'border-style', 'border-color'],
+  'border-width': ['border-top-width', 'border-right-width', 'border-bottom-width', 'border-left-width'],
+  'border-radius': ['border-top-left-radius', 'border-top-right-radius', 'border-bottom-right-radius', 'border-bottom-left-radius'],
+  background: ['background-color', 'background-image', 'background-position', 'background-size', 'background-repeat'],
+  font: ['font-family', 'font-size', 'font-weight', 'font-style', 'line-height'],
+  flex: ['flex-grow', 'flex-shrink', 'flex-basis'],
+  gap: ['row-gap', 'column-gap'],
+  overflow: ['overflow-x', 'overflow-y'],
+  transition: ['transition-property', 'transition-duration', 'transition-timing-function', 'transition-delay'],
+  animation: ['animation-name', 'animation-duration', 'animation-timing-function'],
+  'grid-template': ['grid-template-rows', 'grid-template-columns'],
+  'place-items': ['align-items', 'justify-items'],
+  'place-content': ['align-content', 'justify-content'],
+};
+
+/** 一条声明是否影响目标属性：直接同名，或者是能设置它的简写 */
+function affects(declName, prop) {
+  if (declName === prop) return { hit: true, viaShorthand: null };
+  const longhands = SHORTHAND_OF[declName];
+  if (longhands && longhands.includes(prop)) return { hit: true, viaShorthand: declName };
+  return { hit: false };
+}
+
+export function makeExplainStyleTool({ workspaceRoot, projectId, sessionId }) {
+  return tool(
+    'explain_style',
+    `Explain WHY one CSS property has the value it has: every declaration that
+matched the element, in cascade order, with the winner marked and the losers
+listed — including declarations that came from a SHORTHAND.
+
+get_computed_styles gives you the result; this gives you the reason. Reach for it
+the moment a value is not what your CSS says it should be, instead of guessing
+through margin collapse / media queries / unresolved variables one at a time.
+
+The case this was built for: a section's margin-bottom computed to 0px even
+though the stylesheet said 108px. Cause was ".wrap { margin: 0 auto }" — a
+shorthand on a class selector, higher specificity than "main > section", zeroing
+the bottom margin of every .wrap section on the site. Five or six tool calls to
+find by elimination; one call here.
+
+Note it reports the FIRST element matching the selector.`,
+    {
+      selector: z.string().min(1)
+        .describe('CSS selector — the first match is explained. Plain CSS only (no :has-text, >>, nth=).'),
+      property: z.string().min(1)
+        .describe('The CSS property to explain, e.g. "margin-bottom", "color", "display". Use the longhand name when you can — asking about "margin" tells you less than asking about "margin-bottom".'),
+      path: z.string().optional().describe(CANVAS_PATH_DESC),
+      device: z.enum(['desktop', 'tablet', 'mobile']).optional()
+        .describe('Viewport width, so media queries resolve the way they do at that breakpoint (default desktop 1440).'),
+      live: z.boolean().optional().describe(LIVE_PARAM_DESC),
+    },
+    async ({ selector, property, path: relPath, device, live }) => {
+      const asText = (text, isError = false) => ({ content: [{ type: 'text', text }], ...(isError ? { isError: true } : {}) });
+      const target = await resolveCanvasTarget(workspaceRoot, relPath, sessionId);
+      if (!target) return asText('No page found.', true);
+      const guard = requireBrowsable(target);
+      if (guard) return asText(guard, true);
+
+      const W = SITE_DEVICE_W[device || 'desktop'];
+      const prop = property.trim().toLowerCase();
+
+      let acq;
+      try {
+        acq = await acquireArtifactPage({ projectId, workspaceRoot, target, live, viewport: { width: W, height: 900 } });
+        const page = acq.page;
+        const opened = acq;
+
+        const computed = await page.evaluate(([sel, p]) => {
+          const el = document.querySelector(sel);
+          if (!el) return null;
+          return getComputedStyle(el).getPropertyValue(p);
+        }, [selector, prop]);
+        if (computed === null) return asText(`Selector matched no elements: ${selector}`, true);
+
+        const cdp = await page.context().newCDPSession(page);
+        // styleSheetId → 文件名。同一个 selector 出现在两个文件里时（reset + 组件，
+        // 最常见的那种），光打 `.card` 两行人分不出谁是谁。**必须在 CSS.enable
+        // 之前挂监听** —— 已有的样式表是在 enable 的那一刻补发的。
+        const sheetName = new Map();
+        cdp.on('CSS.styleSheetAdded', (ev) => {
+          // ⚠️ `isInline` 要**先**判：`<style>` 块的 sourceURL 是文档自己的地址，
+          // 按 URL 取名会打出 `page.html?nd=raw` 这种（连我们内部的 raw 参数都漏给
+          // agent 看），而它其实是"页面里那段 <style>"
+          const url = ev?.header?.sourceURL || '';
+          const name = ev?.header?.isInline ? '<style> 内联'
+            : (url ? decodeURIComponent((url.split('?')[0] || url).split('/').pop() || url) : '');
+          if (ev?.header?.styleSheetId) sheetName.set(ev.header.styleSheetId, name);
+        });
+        await cdp.send('DOM.enable');
+        await cdp.send('CSS.enable');
+        const { root } = await cdp.send('DOM.getDocument', { depth: -1 });
+        const { nodeId } = await cdp.send('DOM.querySelector', { nodeId: root.nodeId, selector });
+        if (!nodeId) return asText(`Selector matched no elements: ${selector}`, true);
+        const matched = await cdp.send('CSS.getMatchedStylesForNode', { nodeId });
+
+        // 收集：CDP 的 matchedCSSRules 按**优先级递增**排（最后一条最强）
+        const rows = [];
+        const push = (where, style, extra = {}) => {
+          for (const d of style?.cssProperties ?? []) {
+            if (d.disabled) continue;
+            const a = affects(String(d.name).toLowerCase(), prop);
+            if (!a.hit) continue;
+            // ⚠️ CDP 这一版的 `d.value` **本身就带着** `!important`，再拼一次会打出
+            // `color: red !important !important` —— 看起来像源码里真写了两遍
+            const val = String(d.value).replace(/\s*!\s*important\s*$/i, '');
+            rows.push({
+              where,
+              decl: `${d.name}: ${val}${d.important ? ' !important' : ''}`,
+              important: !!d.important,
+              viaShorthand: a.viaShorthand,
+              ...extra,
+            });
+          }
+        };
+
+        let ruleIdx = 0;
+        for (const m of matched.matchedCSSRules ?? []) {
+          const sel = m.rule?.selectorList?.text ?? '?';
+          const sheet = m.rule?.origin === 'user-agent' ? 'browser default'
+            : (matched.cssKeyframesRules ? null : null);
+          const media = (m.rule?.media ?? []).map(x => x.text).filter(Boolean).join(' and ');
+          const from = sheet || sheetName.get(m.rule?.styleSheetId) || '';
+          push(`${sel}${media ? ` @media ${media}` : ''}${from ? ` [${from}]` : ''}`, m.rule?.style, {
+            origin: m.rule?.origin,
+            ruleIdx: ruleIdx++,   // ⭐ 合并键，见下面那段注释
+          });
+        }
+        if (matched.inlineStyle) push('element inline style="…"', matched.inlineStyle, { inline: true, ruleIdx: 'inline' });
+
+        // 合并同一条规则里的重复条目。CDP 会把简写和它展开出来的长手**都**列一遍
+        // （`.wrap { margin: 0 auto }` 出两条：`margin: 0 auto` + `margin-bottom: 0px`），
+        // 直接打印就是四行里两行是同一件事。留长手那条（它给的是真正生效的值），
+        // 把"来自哪个简写"作为标注挂上去。
+        //
+        // ⛔ 合并键必须是**规则本身**（ruleIdx），不能是 selector 文本。审查实测：
+        // `reset.css` 里 `.card{color:red!important}` 加 `component.css` 里
+        // `.card{color:blue}` —— 两条不同规则碰巧同 selector，按文本合并会折成一条，
+        // `same.decl = r.decl` 留下后者的值（蓝）、`same.important ||=` 又把 red 的
+        // important 标志过继给它，于是工具报「蓝赢」而浏览器画的是红，**真正的赢家
+        // 一行都没出现**。正好命中它的目标人群：手写 CSS 上面又叠了 reset/工具类。
+        const merged = [];
+        for (const r of rows) {
+          const same = merged.find(x => x.ruleIdx === r.ruleIdx);
+          if (!same) { merged.push({ ...r }); continue; }
+          const rIsLonghand = !r.viaShorthand;
+          if (rIsLonghand) {
+            same.decl = r.decl;                      // 长手的值才是生效值
+            same.important = same.important || r.important;
+          } else if (!same.viaShorthand) {
+            same.viaShorthand = r.viaShorthand;      // 把简写来历补到长手那条上
+          }
+          if (r.viaShorthand) same.viaShorthand = r.viaShorthand;
+        }
+        rows.length = 0;
+        rows.push(...merged);
+
+        if (!rows.length) {
+          return asText([
+            `${selector} → ${prop} computes to "${computed}"`,
+            '',
+            'No declaration anywhere sets this property (directly or via a shorthand).',
+            'So the value is inherited or the property\'s initial value — if that surprises you,',
+            'the property you wrote is probably not the one you think controls this.',
+          ].join('\n'));
+        }
+
+        // 赢家：!important 的最后一条 > 普通的最后一条（inline 已经排在最后）
+        const importants = rows.filter(r => r.important);
+        const winner = importants.length ? importants[importants.length - 1] : rows[rows.length - 1];
+
+        const degraded = degradedNote(opened);   // 契约：note 非空必须写进返回文本
+        const lines = [
+          ...(degraded ? [degraded, ''] : []),
+          ...(acq.liveNote ? [acq.liveNote, ''] : []),
+          `${selector} → ${prop} computes to "${computed}"  (viewport ${acq.live ? acq.viewport.width : W}px)`,
+          '',
+          'Declarations that matched, weakest first:',
+        ];
+        for (const r of rows) {
+          const mark = r === winner ? '✅ WINS  ' : '   lost  ';
+          const via = r.viaShorthand
+            ? `   ⭐ via the "${r.viaShorthand}" SHORTHAND — it sets ${prop} even though it does not name it`
+            : '';
+          lines.push(`${mark}${r.decl}\n         from  ${r.where}${via}`);
+        }
+        if (winner.viaShorthand) {
+          lines.push('', `⭐ The winning declaration is a shorthand ("${winner.viaShorthand}"). This is the`
+            + ' single most missable cause of "my CSS says X but the page shows Y": a shorthand on a'
+            + ' higher-specificity selector silently resets longhands you set elsewhere. Fix by using'
+            + ` the longhand there, or by setting ${prop} again after it.`);
+        }
+        return asText(lines.join('\n'));
+      } catch (err) {
+        return asText(`explain_style failed: ${err?.message || String(err)}`, true);
+      } finally {
+        await acq?.release?.();   // 一次性：关浏览器；live：松会话锁
+      }
+    },
+  );
+}