@xgent-ai/skills 0.5.0 → 0.7.0

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/3bfb871bd09629b58c791de3a054e1b81f546024aae5c0933ba6f2ecf76f50d5

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+> **Additional context needed**: target platforms/devices and usage contexts.
+
+Adapt an existing **native** design (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`) to a different context: another device class, orientation, platform, or origin. The trap is treating adaptation as scaling. The job is rethinking the experience for the new context, inside the platform conventions of [ios.md](ios.md) / [android.md](android.md); read the target platform's reference before planning if Setup hasn't already.
+
+## Assess Adaptation Challenge
+
+1. **Source context**: what was it designed for, and what assumptions did it make? (Phone-only? Portrait-only? One platform's idioms? A website?)
+2. **Target context**: which device class (phone, tablet, foldable), orientation, platform, and usage posture (one-handed on the go vs two-handed at rest)?
+3. **What breaks**: navigation that doesn't fit the target, layouts that stretch instead of restructure, gestures or controls that don't exist there?
+
+## Adaptation Strategies
+
+### Phone → Tablet (iPad / large screens)
+
+- **Restructure, don't stretch.** A scaled-up phone UI on a tablet is the failure mode. Use size classes (iOS) / window size classes (Android) to switch structure.
+- **Navigation changes shape**: tab bar stays or becomes a sidebar on iPad; Android navigation bar becomes a rail or drawer on expanded width.
+- **Use the width**: split view / master-detail (list + detail side by side), multi-column grids, popovers where phones used sheets.
+- **Multitasking is a size, not an edge case**: iPad Split View and Android multi-window can hand you a phone-width window on a tablet; size-class-driven layout handles both for free.
+
+### Orientation & foldables
+
+- Landscape restructures (side-by-side panes, repositioned controls); never clip or letterbox. Lock orientation only when the task truly demands it.
+- Foldables (Android): react to posture and hinge via window size classes; test folded, unfolded, and tabletop.
+
+### Platform → platform (iOS ↔ Android)
+
+Translate idioms; never transplant them:
+
+| iOS | Android |
+|---|---|
+| Tab bar | Navigation bar / rail / drawer |
+| Edge-swipe back, back chevron | Predictive Back gesture / button |
+| Switch, segmented control, system pickers | Material switch, chips, Material pickers |
+| Action sheet | Bottom sheet / Material dialog |
+| SF Symbols, SF Pro, Dynamic Type | Material Symbols, Roboto, sp scaling |
+| Semantic system colors, materials | Material color roles, tonal elevation |
+| System push/sheet transitions | Container transform, shared-axis, fade-through |
+
+Rebuild navigation and controls in the target's vocabulary; carry over the brand's expressive layer (palette intent, type accent, motion personality) through the target's theming system.
+
+### Web → native (porting a website or web app)
+
+Reconform, don't reflow. Replace web navigation with the platform's model, HTML-shaped controls with platform controls, hover affordances with touch-first ones, and px-based type with Dynamic Type / sp. Then treat the result to the full platform reference; the slop test there is the acceptance bar.
+
+## Implement & Verify
+
+- Drive structure from **size classes / window size classes**, never from device-model checks.
+- Respect safe areas and window insets in every new configuration (notch, hinge, status bar, keyboard).
+- Test on simulators for breadth, then real hardware for truth: at least one phone and one tablet per shipped platform, both orientations, split-screen where supported.
+
+When the adaptation feels native to each context, hand off to `/phoenix-ui polish` for the final pass.
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Ship a stretched phone layout on a tablet
+- Port one platform's controls or navigation onto the other
+- Hide core functionality on smaller devices (if it matters, make it work)
+- Lock orientation to dodge a layout bug
+- Trust simulators alone (posture, gestures, and performance need hardware)

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/3cf6cbbf0edb6104a179933015049d781610a500036edbfb9d1b6ae977146fd2

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# Plan and asset review
+
+Use this checkpoint on comp-led builds once every raster region has its plate and the plates gate has scored them, before any page code exists. The approved comp is the reference. The user reviews two things: the plates that will ship, and the production plan for everything else, meaning which regions code draws. A painted region planned as code is the most expensive mistake a comp-led build makes, and this is where the user catches it. Text, controls and chrome are judged later, in the assembled first viewport.
+
+## Plan, capture, serve
+
+Run `.agents/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review plan`. It writes `.phoenix-ui/review/components.json` from the measured spec, the comp and the plate files, and refuses, naming each one, while any raster region lacks its plate. Never write or edit that file for this stage: the packet is derived from the spec, so every change belongs in the regions file.
+
+If the harness exposes `component_review`, call it with `manifest_path` set to `.phoenix-ui/review/components.json`. The host captures, presents the review and returns the user's decisions. A suspended request is waiting for the user; it is not a failed build or an approval.
+
+Otherwise run `.agents/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review capture --manifest .phoenix-ui/review/components.json`, then start `.agents/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review serve --session <returned session>` in the background. Open the URL it prints in the available browser and wait for the user; `serve` exits 0 once they submit. Read the decisions with `.agents/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review status --session <id>`; `.agents/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review verify --manifest .phoenix-ui/review/components.json` confirms approval and refuses pending, needs-work and stale input. Never submit the page or write a receipt on the user's behalf.
+
+`serve` exits 2 when this session has no browser (the same signal as the decision page) and 4 when it closes after 30 idle minutes without a decision. Either way no one is reviewing: stop waiting, do not approve anything yourself, and do not build past this checkpoint. End the run and report the plan and asset review as pending with its session ID, so the user can resume it. A waiting review is pending work, not a completed build.
+
+## Act on the receipt
+
+Apply the user's decisions as given, never your own favorable verdict in their place.
+
+- **approve**: once every item is approved and the inventory is confirmed, advance to the hero.
+- **revise** (a plate): regenerate that plate at the same path with the user's feedback.
+- **revise with split** (an asset): replace that region in the regions file with its layers: a frame plate with a transparent opening (kind `plate`, same box), the content as its own `image` region at the opening's box, and each moving part (a shutter, a door) as its own plate. Name each layer after the original region, as `<id>-frame`, `<id>-view` or `<id>-shutter-left`, so the next round shows it as part of the user's request. Rerun `.agents/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>` and produce the plates.
+- **revise** (a plan item): change the regions file as the feedback says (resize or extend a raster region, split material into its own plate region, or adjust the code region), rerun `.agents/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce any new plates.
+- **reclassify** (a code region): in the regions file, change that region's `kind` to the one the user chose and rewrite its `note` to describe the material. Rerun `.agents/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, then produce the new plates, with the asset producer when subagents are available.
+- **missing**: add the region to the regions file, rerun `.agents/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce its plate if it is raster.
+
+Then run `plan`, `capture` and `serve` again. Unchanged decisions carry over, so the user sees only what changed. Any spec change, or a plate replaced after acceptance, needs a new round; the build-phase gate stays closed until the review of the current spec is accepted.
+
+## Assemble and review
+
+Build the first viewport from the approved plates and plan, and run the hero gate. Human review does not waive its integrity checks. After three failed hero attempts, stop iterating and present the first-viewport review with the current build; the user's eye settles what the readings could not.
+
+Present a second manifest at `.phoenix-ui/review/hero.json`. You write this one, and its shape is fixed:
+
+```json
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 2,
+  "stage": "hero",
+  "id": "hero",
+  "title": "First viewport",
+  "comp": {"path": ".phoenix-ui/mocks/comp.png", "width": 1536, "height": 1024},
+  "components": [{
+    "id": "first-viewport",
+    "name": "First viewport",
+    "medium": "HTML / CSS",
+    "note": "Assembled first viewport",
+    "box": {"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1},
+    "preview": {"kind": "page", "path": "index.html"},
+    "dependencies": ["styles.css", "assets/plates/sky.png", "fonts/display.woff2"]
+  }]
+}
+```
+
+- `schemaVersion` is 2. Version 3 is the plan review packet and requires stage `components`. `codeRegions` and `specSha256` exist only in version 3 and are refused here. `reviewGroup` is refused too: version 3 rejects it, and any other version accepts it only on a page preview in a `components`-stage manifest, never in a hero manifest.
+- `comp.path` is the `comp` value in `.phoenix-ui/build/spec.json`, and `width` and `height` are that PNG's pixel size.
+- Exactly one component, with `box` exactly `{"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1}` and `name`, `medium` and `note` as strings.
+- `preview.path` is the page entry the build gates (`artifact` in `.phoenix-ui/build/state.json`).
+- `dependencies` lists every other file the page loads (stylesheets, scripts, plates, images, fonts) as bare strings. Every path, here and above, is project-relative and plain: no leading `./` or `/`, no `..`, no URL, no `?`, `#`, `%`, `:` or backslash. A request to a file missing from this list, or to another host, fails the capture.
+
+The reference stays the approved comp. Call the same host review tool, or run `capture`, `serve` and `verify` with this manifest. Needs-work feedback starts another assembly round.
+
+Acceptance closes human review for this build: never request plan, asset or assembly approval again. While the page renders what the user accepted, the hero score, the palette check and every numeric reading are advisories; material vetoes still hold (a missing or unreferenced plate, an SVG illustration, an organic clip, a clipped plate, invented ink, failed rendered presence). When the capture no longer matches the accepted screenshot, restore what the user accepted; until then the readings apply. Complete the rest of the page, responsive behavior, finish checks and documentation with the accepted first viewport as the visual direction. This is first-viewport calibration, not a claim that the user reviewed the rest of the page. Shared stylesheet edits do not reopen approval. Preserve the accepted direction; a later explicit user change is a new task.
+
+Assembled-page capture executes inline and declared local scripts from the pinned inputs. Network APIs, frames and workers are unavailable; the initial viewport must settle before capture. Keep the real page and declare its scripts rather than removing behavior to pass review.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/3d8d9a62aa3f861a6ebfe97e258f72084023962fa7954d46b5c9269d2cb48450

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Visualize: Direction Comps & Asset Production
+
+Load this from [new-work.md](new-work.md) on a comp-led build, when image generation is available (a harness-native tool or the API fallback `phoenix-ui context` reports). A code-led contract skips this file by design, not by drift; do not load it then. PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md are preconditions. The MODE RULES block concept-seed printed for this surface (COMPS) governs these comps together with this file and wins where they conflict; with no roll this session, read the mode's file named in new-work.md. New-work has already resolved the visual world; this file must not reopen it. A surface-scope structure round that already put three visualized cards before the user (new-work.md, established world) has discharged this round: the locked card's comp is the approved comp, so record the approval and continue at After approval; generate nothing new.
+
+A probe tests composition, narrative, hierarchy, density, focal moment, signature use, and image requirements. It is not a second identity workshop. Keep DESIGN.md's palette, typography direction, material language, component character, imagery stance, and motion grammar fixed.
+
+## Generate three compositional options
+
+The comp round runs inside the build's phase state: `phoenix-ui build-phase start --direction <seed key> --kind <...>` has already run (the roll's output names the command) and its `comps` phase is open before the first comp is generated; a comp rendered before that sits outside the state, and a session resumed from that point has no phases to follow. `phoenix-ui generate-image` refuses to write under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/` until start has run; a harness-native image tool is bound by the same order.
+
+Render three distinct high-fidelity north-star comps of the requested surface, saved under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/` so they survive the session. Comp at the surface's own viewport: portrait at device size for a native app or mobile-first surface, desktop landscape otherwise; a phone screen comped landscape misstates the composition before anything is built against it. Comps are the build thread's own work, never delegated: the thread that writes the prompts holds the direction's full context and has seen every comp when the build starts. Open every image by its workspace-relative path; sandboxed viewers reject absolute paths, and everything under the project root has a relative one. Base the comps on real content and the surface concepts already developed with the user. On an established world, anchor every comp on the real identity: capture a screenshot of a representative existing page and pass it as a reference image (the harness image tool's input image, or `phoenix-ui generate-image --ref`); the prompt leads with the new surface's structure while the reference carries palette, type, and component character, because DESIGN.md words alone drift where a pixel reference does not. Name what the reference contributes and what it must not: chrome, palette, type, and component character carry over; the reference page's own content does not, and a banner, hero, or card lifted verbatim is the reference leaking, not fidelity. Three is the number: one comp invites rubber-stamping; the spread between three surfaces the composition worth building. The chosen card's decision comp is the first of the three: it already renders this direction at full fidelity under this discipline, so generate two more that vary what the first held fixed, from the direction in words rather than with the first comp as an input image (a reference image anchors the layout, and three comps collapse into one composition). How comps two and three vary from the first is the mode's call, in its COMPS rules. A variant that simplifies the first into a tidier version of itself adds no choice to the round. Send all three to the approval point together. Only a round arriving with no decision comp (a degraded roll, an identity-mode page, a direction pinned without the decision round) renders all three here.
+
+- A comp is a designed surface, not a picture of the subject. Lead the prompt with the surface's own structure: the regions this design has, named in order with their scale relationships; a page with no navigation says so instead of inventing one, and an unconventional surface states its unconventional skeleton. A prompt that leads with atmosphere gets a vignette back: the model paints the fish market instead of the fish market's website. How far the world reaches into the page, and what it may carry, is the mode's call, in its COMPS rules. Render the page itself edge to edge: no browser window, address bar, device or desk around it, so prompt it as the page, never as a screenshot of a browser. Self-check every render: if it could hang as a poster, or reads as a photograph with some text on it, it is not a comp; regenerate with the dealt composition's regions named and its parts working in place.
+- The inverse is also a failure: a surface with none of its subject in it. The subject appears as the content the regions hold; the world dresses the frame and never displaces what the frame shows. The deletion usually rides in on the prompt's exclusion list, so exclusions bind invented claims, and a medium ban belongs to the committed imagery stance, never to caution. Before accepting a render, point at the subject; a render that depicts everything about the world and nothing of the subject fails however faithful its atmosphere. Regenerate with the subject's content named region by region.
+- Judge a comp as the shipped screen: the visitor's job must be readable from the image alone. Name the surface's mode from the render with no caption; a render whose mode cannot be read back is art direction without a surface. Regenerate with the visitor's job as the prompt's spine.
+- Commitment is depth, not performance spread across regions. The world enters through one dominant move plus the material, type, and spacing that support it; the remaining regions hold still in that material so the move can be read. A region that simply does its job in the world's grammar carries the direction further than a region performing the concept. The check cuts competition, never content: a quieted region keeps its information and stops performing, and the page still carries its content (a way to navigate, the offer, its supporting copy, an action, a glimpse of what follows) at real reading size (body text near 16px on a 1440px-wide page). That is a list of content, not a layout: where each piece sits is the composition's call. A second element competing with the named focal moment at the same scale means the comp is shouting; with no named focal moment, several regions performing the concept at once is the same shout. Regenerate keeping the strongest move and quieting the rest. Busy is louder, not bolder.
+- When the user shortlisted multiple concepts, spread the three across them.
+- When one direction is committed, vary the structural uncertainty an image can resolve: topology, sequence, density, hierarchy, focal composition, or interaction framing.
+- Show enough beyond the opening moment to prove the concept can govern the whole surface.
+- Do not generate a palette artifact, ask new atmosphere questions, introduce a different type voice, or invent a new motif. If the committed world cannot support the concept, return to the concept shortlist rather than changing the world.
+
+Each comp is a direction test, not a screenshot specification. Core UI text, responsive behavior, accessibility, semantics, and interaction states remain implementation responsibilities.
+
+## One approval point
+
+Show the three together on the decision page (`phoenix-ui serve-question`, one option per comp with the comp as its hero), or in the harness only when it renders images inline; a text-only surface does not count as display. Ask what should carry forward, what feels false to the world, and whether the selected concept should be approved, combined, revised, or rejected. Then stop and wait. A structured simulated user counts as attended and receives the same question.
+
+Do not begin code until the user approves a direction or explicitly delegates the choice. If they delegate, choose using the task brief, PRODUCT.md, and DESIGN.md, and state the evidence. Approval refines the task concept; it does not modify DESIGN.md.
+
+This approval point has no substitute and no skip condition. When the structured question tool errors, fall back to the decision page; only after both fail may you treat the choice as delegated, and a delegated pick is recorded exactly as an approval is and disclosed in your first reply, not your last. The finish reviewer treats comp-round comps with no recorded approval as a material finding; decision comps under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/decision/` are the direction round's hand, not comp-round output, and imply no approval on their own.
+
+After approval, record the choice where tools can find it: the approved comp's path goes in the surface brief, and its prompt sidecar (the image's full file name plus `.json`: `a.png` gets `a.png.json`) gains `"approved": true` (every comp generated through `phoenix-ui generate-image` has one; create it if a native tool didn't). The sidecar travels with the mocks folder, so the approval survives sessions and machines that never see the brief, and it is what `phoenix-ui build-phase advance` reads to close the comps phase. Summarize the composition and the parts of the comp that must not be literalized, return to new-work.md, record the direction contract from the approved concept, and build.
+
+## After approval: the comp becomes a spec
+
+The approved comp is a north star for translation into semantic, responsive, accessible code, never a license to recompose: keeping the palette and mood while redrawing the topology is a second art direction. Do not rasterize core UI text or controls. Do not substitute a different visual driver after approval without asking.
+
+What the comp shows is measured, not remembered. new-work.md section 6 runs the build as phases (`phoenix-ui build-phase`): the spec phase turns the comp into region boxes with sampled palettes (`phoenix-ui comp-spec`), and the medium of every region follows from what the pixels are, never from what feels buildable: a figure, a product object, machinery, any illustration with perspective, shading, or drawing skill in it, and any texture by name (woven cloth, paper grain, fabric, leather, brushed metal) is a `plate` / `image` / `texture` region and ships as a raster; text, controls, chrome, diagrams with countable elements, flat shape systems, and anything that must move, scale, or respond are semantic. Writing "CSS" for a sculpted panel's finish, or a many-vertex `clip-path` for a torn edge, is the quiet deletion of the approved design; the detector's organic-clip-path and buried-raster rules and the hero gate's region scores catch it. Dropping an image-native region is a scope decision the user makes at the approval point, never a silent flattening after it. Generated imagery is a material, not a claim: evidence rules bind assertions, specs, testimonials, and photographs presented as real, never render fidelity.
+
+## Plates and provenance
+
+Every raster region's plate is produced in the plates phase, before any page code, by the shipped asset producer or in the current thread (use `phoenix-ui comp-spec --crop <id>` and save `phoenix-ui comp-spec --plate-prompt <id>` to a prompt file; pass the crop and prompt to the harness image tool, or use `phoenix-ui generate-image --ref <crop.png> --prompt-file <prompt.txt> --out <plate.png> --size <WxH> --quality high`). For isolated cutouts, add `--background transparent` to both the plate-prompt and API generation commands; use native PNG alpha and preserve white paint and clear gaps. Use `--background opaque` for full-frame imagery. Create output directories first and inspect alpha on light and dark grounds. Generation context is part of the asset: after generating any image with any tool, run `.gemini/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui embed-prompt <image> --prompt "<prompt>"` with the exact string the tool received (`phoenix-ui generate-image` does this itself), so the intent lives inside the file; `--read` recovers it, `--scan <dir>` lists rasters still missing one. The embedded prompt plus the region's row in the spec is the raster's **provenance**, and every raster the artifact references carries it; a sourced, stock, or pre-existing raster embeds its origin instead. A raster created or replaced later, in a fix batch or a reviewer's rebuild, is produced the same way; a raster a fix abandons is deleted in the same batch.
+
+Convert images with a converter `phoenix-ui context` reported at boot (the IMAGE_TOOLS line); probe only when it reported none, at most once per session, never per image.
+
+Return to [new-work.md](new-work.md) for the direction contract, the phased build, and the finishing pass.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/3e248b902071dd4295e8c8454cac3ec2fe43bbcda99669871cd822c9f67e0f6c

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Layout turns product priority into reading order, grouping, rhythm, and usable space. Diagnose the structural problem before moving boxes.
+
+---
+
+## Visitor mode
+
+- **Persuade + Experience:** composition may be asymmetric, fluid, or intentionally disruptive when the selected world earns it.
+- **Operate + Read:** predictable structure, stable density, and navigable linearity are affordances.
+- **Native:** follow [ios.md](ios.md) or [android.md](android.md) for navigation, insets, adaptation, and touch targets.
+
+Preserve the established visual world. A layout command changes structure inside it; identity replacement belongs to [new-work.md](new-work.md).
+
+## Two isolated assessments
+
+When a sub-agent tool is available and permitted, run these independently; otherwise run them yourself in this order.
+
+1. **Layout assessment:** inspect representative states and viewports. Answer every question below with rendered or source evidence:
+   - **Reading order:** Apply the squint test. With detail blurred, can you still identify the primary element, the secondary element, and the major groups in order?
+   - **Grouping:** Are related items close and distinct groups separated, or are containers compensating for weak proximity?
+   - **Rhythm:** Do tight and generous intervals create a deliberate cadence, or is one spacing value repeated until everything has equal weight?
+   - **Structure:** Does the topology match the content and task? Are repeated cards, columns, or sections genuinely equivalent, or merely a framework default?
+   - **Density:** Does the amount of information per region fit use frequency, decision complexity, and visitor mode?
+   - **Adaptation:** At narrow, intermediate, wide, zoomed, and localized states, what reorders, collapses, wraps, scrolls, or remains fixed? Does DOM and focus order still agree with the visual order?
+   - **Extremes:** Do long content, empty states, overlays, sticky elements, safe areas, and small touch targets expose structural failures?
+2. **Mechanical scan:** run:
+
+```bash
+.gemini/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui detect --json --scope layout [target files or dirs]
+```
+
+Also inspect arbitrary spacing, overflow, stacking, and container behavior the detector cannot resolve. Keep mechanical evidence out of the first assessment, then synthesize both passes before editing. A clean scan cannot prove hierarchy or rhythm.
+
+## Set the spatial thesis
+
+Before editing, name:
+
+- the primary reading or task path;
+- what belongs together and what must separate;
+- which element leads and which supports;
+- the intended density and spacing rhythm;
+- how the structure changes across containers, viewports, input modes, and content extremes.
+
+Choose the simplest structural model that expresses those relationships. Use layout primitives according to the relationships they control, and name reusable spacing and container roles semantically.
+
+## Apply
+
+- Group by meaning. Use proximity before adding containers or decoration.
+- Create rhythm through deliberate contrast between tight and generous intervals.
+- Use a documented spacing scale rather than one-off values. A 4-unit base usually provides the useful middle steps that an 8-only scale misses.
+- Let hierarchy follow product priority, not framework defaults.
+- Keep distinct content visually distinct without turning every group into an isolated component.
+- Make responsive behavior structural: reorder, collapse, reflow, or reveal based on what remains important.
+- Prefer container-aware components when the same component appears in different contexts.
+- Use `gap` for sibling rhythm when it expresses the relationship more directly than child margins.
+- Keep touch targets usable even when their visible marks are small.
+- Use depth only when it clarifies state or hierarchy.
+- Make optical corrections only after inspecting the rendered result.
+
+Variation is not a goal by itself. Repetition should support recognition; break it only when content or priority changes.
+
+## Verify
+
+- The squint test still reveals the primary, secondary, and major groups in order.
+- The reading and task path remains clear at every supported size.
+- Related content groups naturally; unrelated content does not blur together.
+- Tight and generous spacing create intentional rhythm instead of monotonous repetition.
+- Density matches use frequency and content complexity.
+- Long text, empty states, localization, zoom, and dynamic content do not break the structure.
+- Keyboard, touch, and assistive-technology order agree with the visual order.
+- The final mechanical scan has no unexplained findings.
+
+Answer each item with rendered or source evidence, then rerun the scan. Do not substitute a bare “yes” for verification.
+
+When the structure holds, hand off to `/phoenix-ui polish`.
+
+## Live-mode signature params
+
+Every variant declares a coarse `density` parameter and authors spacing against `var(--p-density, 1)`.
+
+```json
+{"id":"density","kind":"range","min":0.6,"max":1.4,"step":0.05,"default":1,"label":"Density"}
+```
+
+Add one structural parameter only when the topology genuinely branches. Follow [live.md](live.md)'s parameter contract.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/3eed17255be245a82bf97c8b5c26f47b1a5c37f57847dc53b5eda9e856821a06

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# Plan and asset review
+
+Use this checkpoint on comp-led builds once every raster region has its plate and the plates gate has scored them, before any page code exists. The approved comp is the reference. The user reviews two things: the plates that will ship, and the production plan for everything else, meaning which regions code draws. A painted region planned as code is the most expensive mistake a comp-led build makes, and this is where the user catches it. Text, controls and chrome are judged later, in the assembled first viewport.
+
+## Plan, capture, serve
+
+Run `.rovodev/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review plan`. It writes `.phoenix-ui/review/components.json` from the measured spec, the comp and the plate files, and refuses, naming each one, while any raster region lacks its plate. Never write or edit that file for this stage: the packet is derived from the spec, so every change belongs in the regions file.
+
+If the harness exposes `component_review`, call it with `manifest_path` set to `.phoenix-ui/review/components.json`. The host captures, presents the review and returns the user's decisions. A suspended request is waiting for the user; it is not a failed build or an approval.
+
+Otherwise run `.rovodev/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review capture --manifest .phoenix-ui/review/components.json`, then start `.rovodev/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review serve --session <returned session>` in the background. Open the URL it prints in the available browser and wait for the user; `serve` exits 0 once they submit. Read the decisions with `.rovodev/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review status --session <id>`; `.rovodev/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review verify --manifest .phoenix-ui/review/components.json` confirms approval and refuses pending, needs-work and stale input. Never submit the page or write a receipt on the user's behalf.
+
+`serve` exits 2 when this session has no browser (the same signal as the decision page) and 4 when it closes after 30 idle minutes without a decision. Either way no one is reviewing: stop waiting, do not approve anything yourself, and do not build past this checkpoint. End the run and report the plan and asset review as pending with its session ID, so the user can resume it. A waiting review is pending work, not a completed build.
+
+## Act on the receipt
+
+Apply the user's decisions as given, never your own favorable verdict in their place.
+
+- **approve**: once every item is approved and the inventory is confirmed, advance to the hero.
+- **revise** (a plate): regenerate that plate at the same path with the user's feedback.
+- **revise with split** (an asset): replace that region in the regions file with its layers: a frame plate with a transparent opening (kind `plate`, same box), the content as its own `image` region at the opening's box, and each moving part (a shutter, a door) as its own plate. Name each layer after the original region, as `<id>-frame`, `<id>-view` or `<id>-shutter-left`, so the next round shows it as part of the user's request. Rerun `.rovodev/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>` and produce the plates.
+- **revise** (a plan item): change the regions file as the feedback says (resize or extend a raster region, split material into its own plate region, or adjust the code region), rerun `.rovodev/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce any new plates.
+- **reclassify** (a code region): in the regions file, change that region's `kind` to the one the user chose and rewrite its `note` to describe the material. Rerun `.rovodev/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, then produce the new plates, with the asset producer when subagents are available.
+- **missing**: add the region to the regions file, rerun `.rovodev/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce its plate if it is raster.
+
+Then run `plan`, `capture` and `serve` again. Unchanged decisions carry over, so the user sees only what changed. Any spec change, or a plate replaced after acceptance, needs a new round; the build-phase gate stays closed until the review of the current spec is accepted.
+
+## Assemble and review
+
+Build the first viewport from the approved plates and plan, and run the hero gate. Human review does not waive its integrity checks. After three failed hero attempts, stop iterating and present the first-viewport review with the current build; the user's eye settles what the readings could not.
+
+Present a second manifest at `.phoenix-ui/review/hero.json`. You write this one, and its shape is fixed:
+
+```json
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 2,
+  "stage": "hero",
+  "id": "hero",
+  "title": "First viewport",
+  "comp": {"path": ".phoenix-ui/mocks/comp.png", "width": 1536, "height": 1024},
+  "components": [{
+    "id": "first-viewport",
+    "name": "First viewport",
+    "medium": "HTML / CSS",
+    "note": "Assembled first viewport",
+    "box": {"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1},
+    "preview": {"kind": "page", "path": "index.html"},
+    "dependencies": ["styles.css", "assets/plates/sky.png", "fonts/display.woff2"]
+  }]
+}
+```
+
+- `schemaVersion` is 2. Version 3 is the plan review packet and requires stage `components`. `codeRegions` and `specSha256` exist only in version 3 and are refused here. `reviewGroup` is refused too: version 3 rejects it, and any other version accepts it only on a page preview in a `components`-stage manifest, never in a hero manifest.
+- `comp.path` is the `comp` value in `.phoenix-ui/build/spec.json`, and `width` and `height` are that PNG's pixel size.
+- Exactly one component, with `box` exactly `{"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1}` and `name`, `medium` and `note` as strings.
+- `preview.path` is the page entry the build gates (`artifact` in `.phoenix-ui/build/state.json`).
+- `dependencies` lists every other file the page loads (stylesheets, scripts, plates, images, fonts) as bare strings. Every path, here and above, is project-relative and plain: no leading `./` or `/`, no `..`, no URL, no `?`, `#`, `%`, `:` or backslash. A request to a file missing from this list, or to another host, fails the capture.
+
+The reference stays the approved comp. Call the same host review tool, or run `capture`, `serve` and `verify` with this manifest. Needs-work feedback starts another assembly round.
+
+Acceptance closes human review for this build: never request plan, asset or assembly approval again. While the page renders what the user accepted, the hero score, the palette check and every numeric reading are advisories; material vetoes still hold (a missing or unreferenced plate, an SVG illustration, an organic clip, a clipped plate, invented ink, failed rendered presence). When the capture no longer matches the accepted screenshot, restore what the user accepted; until then the readings apply. Complete the rest of the page, responsive behavior, finish checks and documentation with the accepted first viewport as the visual direction. This is first-viewport calibration, not a claim that the user reviewed the rest of the page. Shared stylesheet edits do not reopen approval. Preserve the accepted direction; a later explicit user change is a new task.
+
+Assembled-page capture executes inline and declared local scripts from the pinned inputs. Network APIs, frames and workers are unavailable; the initial viewport must settle before capture. Keep the real page and declare its scripts rather than removing behavior to pass review.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/40c87038b5f75147a5952a96237acf312a327bf70c1bcd8e0a5f064625ae9668

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+# iOS platform
+
+For native iOS / iPadOS apps: SwiftUI, UIKit, React Native, Expo, Flutter shipping to Apple hardware.
+
+On native, the visitor mode narrows what expression may override. HIG conformance governs structure, navigation, and interaction in every mode; brand expresses through the layer the platform leaves open (tint, type, motion, content).
+
+## The iOS slop test
+
+Would a fluent iPhone user trust this app, or pause at off-spec controls? The tell is "ported from a website": reinvented navigation bars, custom back gestures, web-shaped buttons, hover-dependent affordances. Default to the platform's components; depart only for a reason the user would thank you for.
+
+## Layout & structure
+
+- **Safe area.** Lay out inside the safe-area insets. No controls under the notch, Dynamic Island, home indicator, or rounded corners.
+- **System navigation.** Tab bar for 2–5 top-level sections (sections, never actions), navigation stack for hierarchy, sheet for self-contained tasks. No custom global nav, no mixed metaphors.
+- **Edge-swipe back stays alive.** The left-edge back gesture is muscle memory; never disable or overlay it.
+- **Large titles** on top-level screens, collapsing to inline on scroll. Deep detail screens stay inline.
+
+## Touch targets
+
+- **44×44 pt minimum** for every tappable control, with breathing room between adjacent targets.
+
+## Typography
+
+- **Dynamic Type.** Use the system text styles (Large Title through Caption) so text follows the user's reading size. No hard-coded point sizes.
+- **San Francisco carries the UI.** Body, labels, and controls stay on SF Pro / SF Compact; a brand face may appear in display moments.
+- **11 pt floor**; Body is 17 pt.
+
+## Color & materials
+
+- **Semantic system colors** (label, secondaryLabel, systemBackground, separator, tint). They adapt to Dark Mode and increased contrast automatically; raw hex breaks there.
+- **Dark Mode is a first-class appearance.** Design and test both.
+- **One tint color** drives interactive elements; decoration is not its job.
+- **System materials** for blur and translucency behind bars and sheets; no hand-rolled glassmorphism.
+
+## Components & controls
+
+- **Platform controls.** Switch, segmented control, stepper, system pickers, action sheets, alerts, context menus, swipe actions. Reinventing these for flavor is the most common native slop.
+- **SF Symbols** for iconography: baseline-aligned, Dynamic Type-aware, weight and scale variants. Don't mix in a web icon set.
+- **Deliberate modality.** Sheet for a focused dismissible sub-task, full-screen cover for immersion. Clear Cancel/Done; honor swipe-to-dismiss unless data loss requires a guard.
+- **Grouped/inset lists** for settings-shaped content; no bespoke card stacks.
+
+## Motion
+
+- **System transitions.** Push slides, sheets rise, dismiss reverses the entrance. Custom transitions that fight the navigation model disorient.
+- **Honor Reduce Motion.** Crossfade instead of parallax and large slides.
+
+## Verifying the build
+
+- **Screenshots come from the Simulator, never a browser.** Build and run, then capture with `xcrun simctl io booted screenshot <path>` (with several running, replace `booted` with the target's UDID from `xcrun simctl list devices booted`; display names can collide, the UDID never does). Capture every device class the app ships to, at least one iPhone and, when iPad is a target, one iPad, and write the files where the review flow expects them.
+- **Dark Mode and Dynamic Type belong in the pass.** `xcrun simctl ui booted appearance dark` flips appearance, reusing the capture's UDID when several are booted; a check at a large Dynamic Type size catches the truncation a fixed layout hides.
+- **Simulators give breadth; posture, gestures, and performance need hardware.** Say which one produced the evidence.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/410e86ab4f997f7833b498bef3c5e9d6b886c6882028bf2e5304c245f4f64261

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Region map
+
+A region map names what is actually visible in the approved comp before asset production. It is not a page build or an asset approval.
+
+1. Run `.kiro/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --grid` and open the original and gridded images.
+2. Run `.kiro/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --schema` for the JSON fields. Write `regions.json` with a `regions` array. Each region needs a stable `id`, `kind`, `note`, and exactly one of `pixelBox`, normalized `box`, or `grid`. Use the original comp’s dimensions.
+3. Run `.kiro/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions regions.json --inspect-map`. The output points to a report, overlay, exact crops and `COMPARE` sheets of masked references. The default prints findings; `--json` prints the entire report, with sheet paths in `comparisonSheets`.
+4. Open the comparison sheets first to inspect affected crops together, then open individual crops where more detail is needed. Compare their bounds with the original. Inspect excluded foreground pixels as well as geometry errors. Every overlapping non-container code box is masked in full, including empty space inside it. Bound separate text elements separately so artwork in the gaps stays visible; a container describes their layout extent and never replaces its children. Correct the map and inspect again; use a new output directory each time. Zero errors does not certify crop accuracy. Coverage warnings are hints, not proof of completeness.
+
+If the request ends at mapping, stop with the map, inspection report and unresolved findings. To continue a build, measure the inspected map with `comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions regions.json` and follow [new-work.md](new-work.md).
+
+`--auto` produces horizontal band scaffolding, not element identification. It is optional and does not replace authoring a map.
+
+## Containment
+
+`parentId` identifies an enclosing `container: true` region. Parent and children keep separate IDs and crops. Containment never transfers approval.
+
+## What varies independently
+
+Split regions by what varies independently: content the site swaps (room photos, products, people), moving parts (anything a hover or the signature interaction moves), and structure (frames, surrounds, ornament). A window with open shutters onto a room is three kinds of region: the surround as a plate with a transparent opening, the room as an image region beneath it, and each shutter as its own plate. Overlapping regions are composited in the page. `comp-spec` flags a raster region whose note names a frame and the view it opens onto (`baked-composite`), and the plan and asset review shows it to the user first.
+
+## Painted material
+
+When measuring, `comp-spec` flags a `text`, `control` or `chrome` region, containers included, whose crop looks painted (`painted-pixels`: many colours, soft gradients) and lists it in its summary. The plan and asset review shows flagged regions, and those marked `codeDrawn` (painted material you chose to draw in code), to the user first. Do not leave the catch to them: if a region is painted material (a figure, a photograph, a metal or paper surface), classify it `plate`, `image` or `texture` now.
+
+Comp crops are reference evidence only, never production assets. The map inspector marks its PNGs as comp-derived.