@xera-ai/skills 0.4.0 → 0.4.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/version.json +2 -2
- package/xera-report.md +88 -2
package/package.json
CHANGED
package/version.json
CHANGED
package/xera-report.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -50,8 +50,38 @@ Step 4 below is *cognitive work that YOU, the session, must do*. It is not a she
|
|
|
50
50
|
|
|
51
51
|
**Do not skip this step.** If you find yourself about to call `bun run xera:report` without having written this file, stop and write the file first.
|
|
52
52
|
|
|
53
|
+
## Step 4b — TEST_OUTDATED pre-check (v0.6.1)
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
For every scenario in `classifier-input.json` whose `outcome === "FAIL"`:
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
1. Compute `scenarioId = sha1(<TICKET> + ":" + normalize(scenario.name))` (lowercase, single-spaced).
|
|
58
|
+
2. Query the graph: `bun run xera:graph-query --ticket <TICKET> --format json | jq '.edges[] | select(.kind == "modifies") | select(.discoveredAt > <scenario.generatedAt>)'`.
|
|
59
|
+
3. If there are 0 candidates → skip this scenario, no LLM call needed.
|
|
60
|
+
4. If there are ≥1 candidates → run the `classify-outdated.md` prompt (located at `packages/prompts/classify-outdated.md`):
|
|
61
|
+
- Inputs: scenario gherkin + original AC, candidate tickets' AC, failure expected/actual from trace.
|
|
62
|
+
- Wrap untrusted ticket text using the v0.3 untrusted-input preamble pattern (boundary tags + refusal label).
|
|
63
|
+
- Output: JSON `{ classification, confidence, evidence }` per the prompt schema.
|
|
64
|
+
5. Aggregate all decisions into `.xera/<TICKET>/runs/<RUN_ID>/outdated-decisions.json` keyed by `scenarioId`.
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
**If lazy similarity is needed** (a candidate ticket exists but has no `similar` edges and is hot for many scenarios), first run:
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
```bash
|
|
69
|
+
bun run xera:graph-enrich --ticket <CANDIDATE>
|
|
70
|
+
```
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
This populates `similar` edges so future graph queries are richer. Skip if not needed.
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
53
74
|
4a. **Heal sub-flow (only if SELECTOR_DRIFT present).** If the user passed `--no-heal` in the invocation, skip this entire sub-flow and proceed directly to step 5.
|
|
54
75
|
|
|
76
|
+
**v0.6.1 update:** Before invoking heal, check whether the scenario's failure was classified as TEST_OUTDATED. Read `.xera/{{TICKET}}/runs/{{RUN_ID}}/outdated-decisions.json` (written at step 4b, available in the current session). If the scenario's entry has `classification === 'TEST_OUTDATED'` and `confidence >= 0.7`, **SKIP heal** and instead instruct the user to regenerate the scenario from the candidate ticket's new AC:
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
```bash
|
|
79
|
+
# Example:
|
|
80
|
+
bun run xera:script <ORIGINAL_TICKET> --refresh-from <CANDIDATE_TICKET>
|
|
81
|
+
```
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
Heal is for selector drift (DOM moved); TEST_OUTDATED requires a scenario rewrite, not a heal.
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
55
85
|
Otherwise: read `.xera/{{TICKET}}/classifier-input.json` (which you just wrote in step 4) and check whether any scenario has `class: "SELECTOR_DRIFT"`. If none, skip this entire sub-flow and proceed directly to step 5 (Aggregate + draft).
|
|
56
86
|
|
|
57
87
|
If at least one scenario is SELECTOR_DRIFT, take the FIRST such scenario (by array order — the single-heal guard) and execute Phases A–C below. Subsequent SELECTOR_DRIFT scenarios are NOT auto-healed in the same `/xera-report` invocation; list them in the report output as "additional drifts: re-run /xera-report after applying the first heal."
|
|
@@ -118,8 +148,13 @@ If at least one scenario is SELECTOR_DRIFT, take the FIRST such scenario (by arr
|
|
|
118
148
|
|
|
119
149
|
After the heal sub-flow finishes (whether it applied, refused, or errored), continue to step 5 below to aggregate + draft the report. The Jira comment in step 5 reflects the run as it was originally classified — heal results are a separate concern not (in v0.5) folded into the Jira comment.
|
|
120
150
|
|
|
121
|
-
5. **Aggregate + draft.**
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
151
|
+
5. **Aggregate + draft.** Now invoke the existing `xera:report` flow as before:
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
```bash
|
|
154
|
+
bun run xera:report {{TICKET}} --input=.xera/{{TICKET}}/classifier-input.json
|
|
155
|
+
```
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
The `xera:report` subcommand reads `outdated-decisions.json` (if present) and may upgrade scenario classifications to `TEST_OUTDATED`. It aggregates per-scenario classifications into an overall verdict, updates `status.json` with history, and writes `jira-comment.draft.md`. If exit code is non-zero, surface the error to the user; do not proceed to post.
|
|
123
158
|
|
|
124
159
|
6. **Show the draft.** Read `.xera/{{TICKET}}/jira-comment.draft.md`. Display its content to the user verbatim. Ask: "Post to Jira? (Y/n)" (default: Y, unless `meta.json.source === "local"` for SAMPLE tickets — then never post).
|
|
125
160
|
|
|
@@ -136,3 +171,54 @@ bun run xera:graph-record classify <TICKET> --run-id <RUN_ID>
|
|
|
136
171
|
```
|
|
137
172
|
|
|
138
173
|
Non-fatal. Note: TEST_OUTDATED detection ships in v0.6.1 — for v0.6.0 this just emits `run.classified` events with existing 4-bucket classifications.
|
|
174
|
+
|
|
175
|
+
## Step 10 — Notify ticket owner when TEST_OUTDATED detected (v0.6.1)
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
For every scenario classified as `TEST_OUTDATED` in `outdated-decisions.json`, find the **original ticket** that owns the scenario (from graph: `xera:graph-query --ticket <SCENARIO_OWNER_TICKET> --format json`). Then post a Jira sub-task on that ticket via the existing Jira backend (the same code path `/xera-fetch` uses to read tickets — re-use the configured backend per `xera.config.ts.jira`):
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
Body template:
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
```
|
|
182
|
+
Test for this ticket may be outdated due to changes introduced by <CURRENT_TICKET>. Confidence: <conf>. Run `xera:script <ORIGINAL_TICKET> --refresh-from <CURRENT_TICKET>` to regenerate the test from the new AC.
|
|
183
|
+
```
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
Tag the original ticket's assignee. This routes the signal to the right person, not the current QA running this report.
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
In the current QA's session, only show a summary line:
|
|
188
|
+
```
|
|
189
|
+
3 impact tickets notified (ABC-100, ABC-145, ABC-178). No action required from you.
|
|
190
|
+
```
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
**Config:** Respects `xera.config.report.testOutdatedNotify`:
|
|
193
|
+
- `'jira-subtask'` (default) — post sub-task as above
|
|
194
|
+
- `'comment'` — post comment instead
|
|
195
|
+
- `'console-only'` — only print to terminal, no Jira write
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
## Step 11 — Dispute capture (v0.6.1, optional)
|
|
198
|
+
|
|
199
|
+
After classification is displayed to the user, if any scenario has classification `TEST_OUTDATED` or `REAL_BUG`, prompt the user:
|
|
200
|
+
|
|
201
|
+
```
|
|
202
|
+
Agree with classifications above? [Y]es / [d]ispute
|
|
203
|
+
```
|
|
204
|
+
|
|
205
|
+
If the user picks `d`, prompt:
|
|
206
|
+
```
|
|
207
|
+
Which scenario? [N]
|
|
208
|
+
What classification do you think it should be? (REAL_BUG / TEST_BUG / SELECTOR_DRIFT / FLAKY / TEST_OUTDATED)
|
|
209
|
+
Reason (optional, single line):
|
|
210
|
+
```
|
|
211
|
+
|
|
212
|
+
Then emit a dispute event:
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
```bash
|
|
215
|
+
bun run xera:graph-record dispute \
|
|
216
|
+
--run-id <RUN_ID> \
|
|
217
|
+
--scenario-id <SCENARIO_ID> \
|
|
218
|
+
--from <ORIGINAL_CLASSIFICATION> \
|
|
219
|
+
--to <DISPUTED_CLASSIFICATION> \
|
|
220
|
+
--actor "$(git config user.email)" \
|
|
221
|
+
--reason "<REASON>"
|
|
222
|
+
```
|
|
223
|
+
|
|
224
|
+
Non-fatal: if it fails, log warning and continue. Dispute events are captured for v0.7+ classifier learning; v0.6.1 does not change classifier behavior based on disputes.
|