@xenonbyte/da-vinci-workflow 0.1.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +306 -0
- package/SKILL.md +377 -0
- package/agents/openai.yaml +7 -0
- package/bin/da-vinci.js +8 -0
- package/commands/claude/da-vinci.md +23 -0
- package/commands/claude/dv/breakdown.md +21 -0
- package/commands/claude/dv/build.md +17 -0
- package/commands/claude/dv/design.md +20 -0
- package/commands/claude/dv/tasks.md +19 -0
- package/commands/claude/dv/verify.md +16 -0
- package/commands/codex/prompts/da-vinci.md +24 -0
- package/commands/codex/prompts/dv-breakdown.md +19 -0
- package/commands/codex/prompts/dv-build.md +13 -0
- package/commands/codex/prompts/dv-design.md +14 -0
- package/commands/codex/prompts/dv-tasks.md +16 -0
- package/commands/codex/prompts/dv-verify.md +15 -0
- package/commands/gemini/da-vinci.toml +26 -0
- package/commands/gemini/dv/breakdown.toml +19 -0
- package/commands/gemini/dv/build.toml +13 -0
- package/commands/gemini/dv/design.toml +14 -0
- package/commands/gemini/dv/tasks.toml +13 -0
- package/commands/gemini/dv/verify.toml +15 -0
- package/docs/workflow-examples.md +104 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/README.md +40 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/design-brief.md +24 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/design-registry.md +15 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/design.md +32 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/page-map.md +19 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/pencil-bindings.md +13 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/pencil-design.md +29 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/proposal.md +33 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/site/index.html +192 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/site/product-detail.html +165 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/specs/marketing-site/spec.md +37 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/tasks.md +28 -0
- package/examples/greenfield-spec-markupflow/verification.md +37 -0
- package/lib/cli.js +100 -0
- package/lib/install.js +286 -0
- package/package.json +31 -0
- package/references/artifact-templates.md +364 -0
- package/references/checkpoints.md +141 -0
- package/references/design-inputs.md +55 -0
- package/references/modes.md +84 -0
- package/references/page-mapping.md +47 -0
- package/references/pencil-design-to-code.md +64 -0
- package/references/platform-adapters.md +66 -0
- package/scripts/postinstall.js +9 -0
- package/scripts/validate-assets.js +9 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Da Vinci workflow command index for Claude
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Platform: Claude
|
|
9
|
+
Default workflow entry: `/da-vinci <request>`
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
Available routes:
|
|
12
|
+
- `/dv:breakdown` - Break a product or page request into scope, flows, states, and requirements.
|
|
13
|
+
- `/dv:design` - Plan or create Pencil-backed page designs from approved requirements.
|
|
14
|
+
- `/dv:tasks` - Generate implementation tasks from requirements plus Pencil design coverage.
|
|
15
|
+
- `/dv:build` - Implement code that follows both the requirements and the Pencil design.
|
|
16
|
+
- `/dv:verify` - Check requirement coverage, design coverage, and implementation drift.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
Notes:
|
|
19
|
+
- Requirements decide behavior.
|
|
20
|
+
- Pencil decides presentation.
|
|
21
|
+
- Code must follow both.
|
|
22
|
+
- Use `references/platform-adapters.md` for shared invocation rules.
|
|
23
|
+
- Use `references/checkpoints.md` when running workflow checkpoints.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Break requirements into scope, flows, states, and specs for Da Vinci.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Breakdown
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `breakdown`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Focus on:
|
|
11
|
+
- scope
|
|
12
|
+
- pages
|
|
13
|
+
- flows
|
|
14
|
+
- states
|
|
15
|
+
- data and integration needs
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Create or update:
|
|
18
|
+
- `proposal.md`
|
|
19
|
+
- `specs/<capability>/spec.md`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Ask only the minimum clarification needed to define implementation-safe requirements.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Build software from requirements and Pencil design data for Da Vinci.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Build
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `build`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Focus on:
|
|
11
|
+
- requirements-backed behavior
|
|
12
|
+
- Pencil-backed layout and presentation
|
|
13
|
+
- implementation order from `tasks.md`
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
During implementation:
|
|
16
|
+
- run `execution checkpoint` after each top-level task group
|
|
17
|
+
- update source artifacts before continuing if drift is found
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Create or refine Pencil-backed design plans for Da Vinci.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Design
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `design`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Focus on:
|
|
11
|
+
- page map
|
|
12
|
+
- layout structure
|
|
13
|
+
- interaction model
|
|
14
|
+
- Pencil page coverage
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Create or update:
|
|
17
|
+
- `design.md`
|
|
18
|
+
- `pencil-design.md`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
Run the `design checkpoint` before locking implementation tasks.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Generate implementation tasks from requirements and Pencil designs for Da Vinci.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Tasks
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `tasks`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Focus on:
|
|
11
|
+
- top-level task groups
|
|
12
|
+
- spec coverage
|
|
13
|
+
- Pencil coverage
|
|
14
|
+
- dependency order
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Create or update:
|
|
17
|
+
- `tasks.md`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Run the `task checkpoint` before implementation begins.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Verify requirement coverage, Pencil coverage, and drift for Da Vinci.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Verify
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `verify`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Check:
|
|
11
|
+
- behavior coverage against specs
|
|
12
|
+
- page and section coverage against Pencil
|
|
13
|
+
- drift between requirements, Pencil, tasks, and code
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
Create or update:
|
|
16
|
+
- `verification.md`
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Da Vinci entrypoint for Codex. Prefer the da-vinci skill for natural-language workflow requests.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Codex usage model:
|
|
9
|
+
- Preferred: `$da-vinci <request>`
|
|
10
|
+
- Explicit routing: `/prompts:da-vinci` and `/prompts:dv-*`
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
Available routes:
|
|
13
|
+
- `/prompts:dv-breakdown` - Break a request into requirements, pages, flows, and states.
|
|
14
|
+
- `/prompts:dv-design` - Plan or create Pencil-backed designs from approved requirements.
|
|
15
|
+
- `/prompts:dv-tasks` - Generate implementation tasks from requirements plus Pencil.
|
|
16
|
+
- `/prompts:dv-build` - Implement code from requirements plus Pencil data.
|
|
17
|
+
- `/prompts:dv-verify` - Verify requirement coverage, design coverage, and drift.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Important:
|
|
20
|
+
- Treat `/prompts:*` as action selectors in Codex.
|
|
21
|
+
- If details are still needed after route selection, provide them in the next message.
|
|
22
|
+
- Requirements decide behavior.
|
|
23
|
+
- Pencil decides presentation.
|
|
24
|
+
- Code must follow both.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Da Vinci breakdown route for Codex.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Breakdown
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `breakdown`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Output should move the work toward:
|
|
11
|
+
- `proposal.md`
|
|
12
|
+
- `specs/<capability>/spec.md`
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Break the request into:
|
|
15
|
+
- scope
|
|
16
|
+
- pages
|
|
17
|
+
- flows
|
|
18
|
+
- states
|
|
19
|
+
- data needs
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Da Vinci build route for Codex.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Build
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `build`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Implementation rules:
|
|
11
|
+
- requirements decide behavior
|
|
12
|
+
- Pencil decides presentation
|
|
13
|
+
- run `execution checkpoint` after each top-level task group
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Da Vinci design route for Codex.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Design
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `design`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Output should move the work toward:
|
|
11
|
+
- `design.md`
|
|
12
|
+
- `pencil-design.md`
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Use Pencil-backed structure as the design source when available.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Da Vinci tasks route for Codex.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Tasks
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `tasks`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Output should move the work toward:
|
|
11
|
+
- `tasks.md`
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Tasks must cover:
|
|
14
|
+
- spec-backed behavior
|
|
15
|
+
- Pencil-backed UI work
|
|
16
|
+
- verification work
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Da Vinci verify route for Codex.
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
# Da Vinci Verify
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Action: `verify`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Check:
|
|
11
|
+
- requirement coverage
|
|
12
|
+
- Pencil coverage
|
|
13
|
+
- drift between artifacts and code
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
Update `verification.md` when needed.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
description = "Da Vinci workflow command index for Gemini"
|
|
2
|
+
prompt = """
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
description: Da Vinci workflow command index for Gemini
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
# Da Vinci
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Platform: Gemini
|
|
11
|
+
Default workflow entry: `/da-vinci <request>`
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Available routes:
|
|
14
|
+
- `/dv:breakdown` - Break a product or page request into scope, flows, states, and requirements.
|
|
15
|
+
- `/dv:design` - Plan or create Pencil-backed page designs from approved requirements.
|
|
16
|
+
- `/dv:tasks` - Generate implementation tasks from requirements plus Pencil design coverage.
|
|
17
|
+
- `/dv:build` - Implement code that follows both the requirements and the Pencil design.
|
|
18
|
+
- `/dv:verify` - Check requirement coverage, design coverage, and implementation drift.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
Notes:
|
|
21
|
+
- Requirements decide behavior.
|
|
22
|
+
- Pencil decides presentation.
|
|
23
|
+
- Code must follow both.
|
|
24
|
+
- Keep workflow semantics shared across Claude, Codex, and Gemini.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
"""
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
description = "Break requirements into scope, flows, states, and specs for Da Vinci."
|
|
2
|
+
prompt = """
|
|
3
|
+
# Da Vinci Breakdown
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Action: `breakdown`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Focus on:
|
|
10
|
+
- scope
|
|
11
|
+
- pages
|
|
12
|
+
- flows
|
|
13
|
+
- states
|
|
14
|
+
- data and integration needs
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Create or update:
|
|
17
|
+
- `proposal.md`
|
|
18
|
+
- `specs/<capability>/spec.md`
|
|
19
|
+
"""
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
description = "Build software from requirements and Pencil design data for Da Vinci."
|
|
2
|
+
prompt = """
|
|
3
|
+
# Da Vinci Build
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Action: `build`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Implementation rules:
|
|
10
|
+
- requirements decide behavior
|
|
11
|
+
- Pencil decides presentation
|
|
12
|
+
- run `execution checkpoint` after each top-level task group
|
|
13
|
+
"""
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
description = "Create or refine Pencil-backed design plans for Da Vinci."
|
|
2
|
+
prompt = """
|
|
3
|
+
# Da Vinci Design
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Action: `design`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Create or update:
|
|
10
|
+
- `design.md`
|
|
11
|
+
- `pencil-design.md`
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Use Pencil-backed page coverage as the source of presentation truth.
|
|
14
|
+
"""
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
description = "Generate implementation tasks from requirements and Pencil designs for Da Vinci."
|
|
2
|
+
prompt = """
|
|
3
|
+
# Da Vinci Tasks
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Action: `tasks`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Create or update:
|
|
10
|
+
- `tasks.md`
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
Tasks must cover spec behavior, Pencil-backed UI work, and verification.
|
|
13
|
+
"""
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
description = "Verify requirement coverage, Pencil coverage, and drift for Da Vinci."
|
|
2
|
+
prompt = """
|
|
3
|
+
# Da Vinci Verify
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Use the `da-vinci` skill for this request.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Action: `verify`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Check:
|
|
10
|
+
- requirement coverage
|
|
11
|
+
- Pencil coverage
|
|
12
|
+
- drift between artifacts and code
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Update `verification.md` when needed.
|
|
15
|
+
"""
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Workflow Examples
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
These examples show how to use Da Vinci in each supported workflow mode.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## 1. `greenfield-spec`
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Use when a new project already has a stable requirement set.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Example request:
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
```text
|
|
12
|
+
$da-vinci use greenfield-spec to break down a new desktop software project for annotated design delivery
|
|
13
|
+
```
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
Expected flow:
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
1. create `design-brief.md`
|
|
18
|
+
2. create `proposal.md`
|
|
19
|
+
3. create `specs/<capability>/spec.md`
|
|
20
|
+
4. create `page-map.md`
|
|
21
|
+
5. register `.pen` sources in `design-registry.md`
|
|
22
|
+
6. create Pencil pages and record them in `pencil-design.md`
|
|
23
|
+
7. bind implementation pages in `pencil-bindings.md`
|
|
24
|
+
8. generate `tasks.md`
|
|
25
|
+
9. build and verify
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## 2. `greenfield-brainstorm`
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
Use when the project starts from multiple rounds of rough ideas.
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Example request:
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
```text
|
|
34
|
+
$da-vinci use greenfield-brainstorm to turn product brainstorming into a page map, Pencil design plan, and implementation tasks
|
|
35
|
+
```
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
Expected flow:
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
1. synthesize ideas into `brainstorm.md`
|
|
40
|
+
2. capture product form factor and preferences in `design-brief.md`
|
|
41
|
+
3. stabilize scope in `proposal.md`
|
|
42
|
+
4. write behavior in `specs/<capability>/spec.md`
|
|
43
|
+
5. define pages in `page-map.md`
|
|
44
|
+
6. register and generate Pencil sources
|
|
45
|
+
7. bind implementation pages to Pencil pages
|
|
46
|
+
8. generate tasks
|
|
47
|
+
9. build and verify
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
## 3. `redesign-from-code`
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Use when the current product already exists and the UI needs broad redesign.
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
Example request:
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```text
|
|
56
|
+
$da-vinci use redesign-from-code to inventory the current app, identify current pages, and generate a new Pencil-backed redesign plan
|
|
57
|
+
```
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
Expected flow:
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
1. scan the existing product into `project-inventory.md`
|
|
62
|
+
2. register any current `.pen` sources in `design-registry.md`
|
|
63
|
+
3. define redesign scope in `proposal.md`
|
|
64
|
+
4. write redesign constraints in `specs/<capability>/spec.md`
|
|
65
|
+
5. rebuild or refine `page-map.md`
|
|
66
|
+
6. create new or updated Pencil pages
|
|
67
|
+
7. bind routes and pages to Pencil screens
|
|
68
|
+
8. generate tasks
|
|
69
|
+
9. build and verify
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
## 4. `feature-change`
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
Use when an existing product needs a scoped requirement or page change.
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
Example request:
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
```text
|
|
78
|
+
$da-vinci use feature-change to add a billing page, generate the Pencil design delta, and create implementation tasks
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
Expected flow:
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
1. define the change in `proposal.md`
|
|
84
|
+
2. write affected behavior in `specs/<capability>/spec.md`
|
|
85
|
+
3. update the affected subset of `page-map.md`
|
|
86
|
+
4. reuse or update the active design source in `design-registry.md`
|
|
87
|
+
5. create the Pencil delta in `pencil-design.md`
|
|
88
|
+
6. update `pencil-bindings.md`
|
|
89
|
+
7. generate tasks
|
|
90
|
+
8. build and verify
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
## Cross-mode rule
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
In every mode:
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
- requirements decide behavior
|
|
97
|
+
- Pencil decides presentation
|
|
98
|
+
- code follows both
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
And in every mode:
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
- `design-registry.md` tracks the available `.pen` sources
|
|
103
|
+
- `pencil-bindings.md` tracks implementation page to Pencil page mapping
|
|
104
|
+
- the workflow runs as `autonomous-by-default` unless a real blocker exists
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# MarkupFlow Forward Test
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
This example is a repo-local end-to-end forward test for Da Vinci.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Mode:
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
- `greenfield-spec`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Scenario:
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
- a desktop-software product named `MarkupFlow`
|
|
12
|
+
- two launch pages
|
|
13
|
+
- Pencil-backed design source
|
|
14
|
+
- static `HTML + Tailwind` implementation
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Files in this example:
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
- `design-brief.md`
|
|
19
|
+
- `proposal.md`
|
|
20
|
+
- `specs/marketing-site/spec.md`
|
|
21
|
+
- `page-map.md`
|
|
22
|
+
- `design.md`
|
|
23
|
+
- `design-registry.md`
|
|
24
|
+
- `pencil-design.md`
|
|
25
|
+
- `pencil-bindings.md`
|
|
26
|
+
- `tasks.md`
|
|
27
|
+
- `verification.md`
|
|
28
|
+
- `site/index.html`
|
|
29
|
+
- `site/product-detail.html`
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Live design source used for this forward test:
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
- active Pencil document: `pencil-new.pen`
|
|
34
|
+
- homepage screen: `MarkupFlow Homepage` (`bi8Au`)
|
|
35
|
+
- detail screen: `MarkupFlow Product Detail` (`LpyYx`)
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
Important note:
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
- the `.pen` source was authored in a live Pencil session and is not committed into this repository
|
|
40
|
+
- this example records the design source and bindings explicitly so implementation can still trace back to the correct Pencil pages
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Design Brief
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Product Form Factor
|
|
4
|
+
- desktop software product
|
|
5
|
+
- desktop-first marketing pages for launch and product explanation
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Visual Direction
|
|
8
|
+
- dark product-marketing surface
|
|
9
|
+
- high-contrast hero
|
|
10
|
+
- tool-like presentation instead of generic SaaS cards
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Brand Constraints
|
|
13
|
+
- product name: `MarkupFlow`
|
|
14
|
+
- modern technical tone
|
|
15
|
+
- strong emphasis on annotated design delivery and MCP readiness
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## Layout Priorities
|
|
18
|
+
- desktop-first composition
|
|
19
|
+
- wide hero with product-flow preview
|
|
20
|
+
- clear sectioning for capabilities, workflow, and CTA
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Notes
|
|
23
|
+
- inferred from the requested scenario: HTML to annotated design, Figma to annotated design, annotated design as MCP data source
|
|
24
|
+
- the example keeps mobile responsive behavior minimal and focuses on desktop fidelity
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Design Registry
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Active Design Sources
|
|
4
|
+
- `pencil-new.pen` -> active -> live authoring source used for the forward test homepage and detail page
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
## Preferred Design Source
|
|
7
|
+
- `pencil-new.pen`
|
|
8
|
+
- reason: it is the source used to create the current implementation outputs
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Historical Or Secondary Sources
|
|
11
|
+
- none recorded for this forward test
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Notes
|
|
14
|
+
- the source was authored in an active Pencil session and was not exported into this repository
|
|
15
|
+
- traceability is preserved through stable screen names and screen ids in `pencil-design.md` and `pencil-bindings.md`
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Design
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Page Map
|
|
4
|
+
- the homepage is a high-impact launch page with a left text column and a right product-flow preview
|
|
5
|
+
- the product detail page is a workflow explanation page with a desktop-workspace hero and a structured pipeline section
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Interaction Model
|
|
8
|
+
- primary CTA on the homepage points users toward product evaluation
|
|
9
|
+
- homepage secondary CTA moves to the product detail page
|
|
10
|
+
- product detail page explains the editor pipeline rather than adding new navigation complexity
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Layout Strategy
|
|
13
|
+
- desktop-first sections
|
|
14
|
+
- large hero headlines
|
|
15
|
+
- dark interface shell with occasional light contrast panels for emphasis
|
|
16
|
+
- modular sections with strong content hierarchy
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Component Strategy
|
|
19
|
+
- shared header treatment across both pages
|
|
20
|
+
- recurring dark panel cards for workflow and capability explanation
|
|
21
|
+
- one light contrast content panel per page to signal structured output
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Content Notes
|
|
24
|
+
- keep copy direct and product-oriented
|
|
25
|
+
- repeat the three-part product thesis consistently:
|
|
26
|
+
- import from HTML or Figma
|
|
27
|
+
- annotate into a structured design artifact
|
|
28
|
+
- publish MCP-ready design data
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Open Questions
|
|
31
|
+
- whether the repo should eventually commit the `.pen` file instead of only recording the active Pencil source
|
|
32
|
+
- whether future iterations should split the product detail page into workflow and MCP integration pages
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Page Map
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Canonical Pages
|
|
4
|
+
- `Homepage` -> `/` -> launch overview for the desktop product and its three core capabilities
|
|
5
|
+
- `Product Detail` -> `/product-detail.html` -> deeper explanation of the workflow, workspace, and MCP publishing model
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## States Per Page
|
|
8
|
+
- `Homepage`: default marketing state
|
|
9
|
+
- `Product Detail`: default product-explanation state
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Shared Sections
|
|
12
|
+
- product header
|
|
13
|
+
- desktop-product positioning line
|
|
14
|
+
- terminal CTA section
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
## Page Priority
|
|
17
|
+
- core pages:
|
|
18
|
+
- `Homepage`
|
|
19
|
+
- `Product Detail`
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Pencil Bindings
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Page To Pencil Page
|
|
4
|
+
- `/` -> `pencil-new.pen` -> `MarkupFlow Homepage` (`bi8Au`)
|
|
5
|
+
- `/product-detail.html` -> `pencil-new.pen` -> `MarkupFlow Product Detail` (`LpyYx`)
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Shared Regions
|
|
8
|
+
- `Site header` -> shared header treatment represented in both screens
|
|
9
|
+
- `Closing CTA band` -> shared end-of-page CTA treatment represented in both screens
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Notes
|
|
12
|
+
- this forward test uses one live `.pen` source with two implementation pages
|
|
13
|
+
- if the Pencil source is exported to the repository later, update the source path here and keep the same screen names where possible
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Pencil Design
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Active `.pen` Source
|
|
4
|
+
- `pencil-new.pen`
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
## Screens
|
|
7
|
+
- `MarkupFlow Homepage` -> screen id `bi8Au`
|
|
8
|
+
- `MarkupFlow Product Detail` -> screen id `LpyYx`
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Screen Notes
|
|
11
|
+
- the homepage screen contains:
|
|
12
|
+
- hero
|
|
13
|
+
- capabilities
|
|
14
|
+
- MCP service
|
|
15
|
+
- closing CTA
|
|
16
|
+
- the product detail screen contains:
|
|
17
|
+
- desktop workspace hero
|
|
18
|
+
- three-step pipeline
|
|
19
|
+
- workspace modules
|
|
20
|
+
- closing CTA
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Implementation Notes
|
|
23
|
+
- preserve the dark desktop-software visual language
|
|
24
|
+
- keep the structural emphasis on three core capabilities on page one
|
|
25
|
+
- keep the import, annotate, publish pipeline readable on page two
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Validation Notes
|
|
28
|
+
- both screens were reviewed in Pencil during authoring
|
|
29
|
+
- no obvious clipping, overlap, or alignment failures were observed in the design pass
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Proposal
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Change
|
|
4
|
+
- Name: MarkupFlow launch pages
|
|
5
|
+
- Owner: Da Vinci forward test
|
|
6
|
+
- Date: 2026-03-27
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
## Goal
|
|
9
|
+
- deliver a two-page launch surface for a desktop software product that converts HTML and Figma sources into annotated design output and exposes structured MCP data
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Non-Goals
|
|
12
|
+
- account system
|
|
13
|
+
- pricing logic
|
|
14
|
+
- dashboard implementation
|
|
15
|
+
- API integration
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## User Value
|
|
18
|
+
- a buyer or evaluator can understand the product capability, workflow, and delivery model in two pages
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Scope
|
|
21
|
+
- homepage
|
|
22
|
+
- product detail page
|
|
23
|
+
- cross-page navigation
|
|
24
|
+
- static launch-page implementation
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Risks
|
|
27
|
+
- the `.pen` source exists in a live Pencil session instead of a committed repository file
|
|
28
|
+
- design-source traceability must rely on explicit screen identifiers
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Success Criteria
|
|
31
|
+
- both pages exist in the repo as static deliverables
|
|
32
|
+
- each implementation page is bound to a named Pencil page
|
|
33
|
+
- verification can show requirement coverage and design coverage without unresolved drift
|