@wowok/agent-mcp 3.3.1 → 3.3.3

package/dist/knowledge/baselines/judgment-baselines.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "description": "Judgment baselines — the factory defaults for every judgment this process makes. Sections: evaluation (scoring standards), game (strategy-game parameters), match (demand↔service matching), monitor (order-monitor thresholds), mode (mode-evaluator posture), scorecard (strategy scorecard tuning), rules (declarative rule book — factory rule packs load from knowledge/baselines/rules/<domain>.json into this namespace and merge with your overrides at rule granularity). Layering: this factory document < your user document (<config dir>/judgment-baselines.json, key-granularity merge — it can replace values or disable rules, never delete these entries) < session runtime overrides < persona < explicit request. The user document hot-reloads on every save; an invalid edit is rejected with the last good version kept in force (see config_operation judgment_list). Example patch (any subset, deep-merged at key granularity, unknown keys rejected): {\"evaluation\": {\"severity_deduction\": {\"critical\": 40}}, \"monitor\": {\"thresholds\": {\"messenger_timeout_hours\": 12}}, \"match\": {\"top_n\": 3}}.",
+  "description": "Judgment baselines — the factory defaults for every judgment this process makes. Sections: evaluation (scoring standards), game (strategy-game parameters), match (demand↔service matching), monitor (order-monitor thresholds), mode (mode-evaluator posture), scorecard (strategy scorecard tuning), role_intent (per-role intent profiles for the L-A layer), rules (declarative rule book — factory rule packs load from knowledge/baselines/rules/<domain>.json into this namespace and merge with your overrides at rule granularity). Layering: this factory document < your user document (<config dir>/judgment-baselines.json, key-granularity merge — it can replace values or disable rules, never delete these entries) < session runtime overrides < persona < explicit request. The user document hot-reloads on every save; an invalid edit is rejected with the last good version kept in force (see config_operation judgment_list). Example patch (any subset, deep-merged at key granularity, unknown keys rejected): {\"evaluation\": {\"severity_deduction\": {\"critical\": 40}}, \"monitor\": {\"thresholds\": {\"messenger_timeout_hours\": 12}}, \"match\": {\"top_n\": 3}}.",
   "evaluation": {
     "comment": "Graph service evaluation standards. Weights are relative; the aggregate renormalizes over the enabled rules. An account persona may override per-dimension weights at runtime (persona layer 'evaluation.weights'), and an explicit request injection wins over persona.",
     "weights": {
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
       },
       "trust_fund_safety": {
         "label": "Fund safety",
-        "description": "Compensation fund vs 3x windowed order volume (statutory ceiling)."
+        "description": "Compensation fund vs 3x the largest windowed order (statutory per-order ceiling)."
       },
       "trust_transparency": {
         "label": "Transparency",
@@ -60,86 +60,188 @@
       "info": 0
     },
     "level_bands": [
-      { "min": 85, "level": "low" },
-      { "min": 70, "level": "medium_low" },
-      { "min": 50, "level": "medium_high" },
-      { "min": 0, "level": "high" }
+      {
+        "min": 85,
+        "level": "low"
+      },
+      {
+        "min": 70,
+        "level": "medium_low"
+      },
+      {
+        "min": 50,
+        "level": "medium_high"
+      },
+      {
+        "min": 0,
+        "level": "high"
+      }
     ],
     "grade_words": {
       "comment": "Readable per-side grade rendered from the score. trust: higher score = better service; risk: higher score = fewer findings (safer).",
       "trust": [
-        { "min": 70, "word": "strong" },
-        { "min": 50, "word": "fair" },
-        { "min": 0, "word": "weak" }
+        {
+          "min": 70,
+          "word": "strong"
+        },
+        {
+          "min": 50,
+          "word": "fair"
+        },
+        {
+          "min": 0,
+          "word": "weak"
+        }
       ],
       "risk": [
-        { "min": 80, "word": "low risk" },
-        { "min": 50, "word": "moderate risk" },
-        { "min": 0, "word": "high risk" }
+        {
+          "min": 80,
+          "word": "low risk"
+        },
+        {
+          "min": 50,
+          "word": "moderate risk"
+        },
+        {
+          "min": 0,
+          "word": "high risk"
+        }
       ]
     }
   },
   "game": {
     "comment": "Strategy-game parameters: role value anchors, appetite multipliers and scoring constants for the gain/risk consistency evaluation (net = base + per_gain*gains − per_risk*risks*sensitivity, clamped 0-100). Keyword rules re-anchor a role's interests from a persona's natural-language red lines (Q5 dictionary — users retune keywords/effects, never invent outcome vocabulary).",
     "outcome_semantics": {
-      "completion": ["fund_released_to_merchant", "refund_leverage_given_up"],
-      "refund": ["fund_returned_to_buyer", "arbitration_review_triggered"],
-      "advance": ["node_advanced"]
+      "completion": [
+        "fund_released_to_merchant",
+        "refund_leverage_given_up"
+      ],
+      "refund": [
+        "fund_returned_to_buyer",
+        "arbitration_review_triggered"
+      ],
+      "advance": [
+        "node_advanced"
+      ]
     },
     "role_interests": {
       "customer": {
-        "prefer": ["fund_returned_to_buyer"],
-        "avoid": ["fund_released_to_merchant", "refund_leverage_given_up"],
-        "sensitivity": 1.0
+        "prefer": [
+          "fund_returned_to_buyer"
+        ],
+        "avoid": [
+          "fund_released_to_merchant",
+          "refund_leverage_given_up"
+        ],
+        "sensitivity": 1
       },
       "merchant": {
-        "prefer": ["fund_released_to_merchant"],
-        "avoid": ["fund_returned_to_buyer", "arbitration_review_triggered"],
-        "sensitivity": 1.0
+        "prefer": [
+          "fund_released_to_merchant"
+        ],
+        "avoid": [
+          "fund_returned_to_buyer",
+          "arbitration_review_triggered"
+        ],
+        "sensitivity": 1
+      },
+      "demander": {
+        "prefer": [
+          "node_advanced"
+        ],
+        "avoid": [],
+        "sensitivity": 1
+      },
+      "collaborator": {
+        "prefer": [
+          "node_advanced"
+        ],
+        "avoid": [],
+        "sensitivity": 1
       },
-      "demander": { "prefer": ["node_advanced"], "avoid": [], "sensitivity": 1.0 },
-      "collaborator": { "prefer": ["node_advanced"], "avoid": [], "sensitivity": 1.0 },
       "supplier": {
-        "prefer": ["fund_released_to_merchant", "node_advanced"],
-        "avoid": ["fund_returned_to_buyer"],
-        "sensitivity": 1.0
+        "prefer": [
+          "fund_released_to_merchant",
+          "node_advanced"
+        ],
+        "avoid": [
+          "fund_returned_to_buyer"
+        ],
+        "sensitivity": 1
       },
       "prospect": {
-        "prefer": ["fund_returned_to_buyer"],
-        "avoid": ["fund_released_to_merchant", "arbitration_review_triggered", "refund_leverage_given_up"],
-        "sensitivity": 1.0
+        "prefer": [
+          "fund_returned_to_buyer"
+        ],
+        "avoid": [
+          "fund_released_to_merchant",
+          "arbitration_review_triggered",
+          "refund_leverage_given_up"
+        ],
+        "sensitivity": 1
+      },
+      "arbitrator": {
+        "prefer": [],
+        "avoid": [
+          "arbitration_review_triggered"
+        ],
+        "sensitivity": 1
+      },
+      "neutral": {
+        "prefer": [],
+        "avoid": [],
+        "sensitivity": 1
       },
-      "arbitrator": { "prefer": [], "avoid": ["arbitration_review_triggered"], "sensitivity": 1.0 },
-      "neutral": { "prefer": [], "avoid": [], "sensitivity": 1.0 },
-      "system": { "prefer": [], "avoid": [], "sensitivity": 1.0 }
+      "system": {
+        "prefer": [],
+        "avoid": [],
+        "sensitivity": 1
+      }
+    },
+    "appetite_multipliers": {
+      "conservative": 1.5,
+      "balanced": 1,
+      "aggressive": 0.6
+    },
+    "scoring": {
+      "base": 60,
+      "per_gain": 20,
+      "per_risk": 25
     },
-    "appetite_multipliers": { "conservative": 1.5, "balanced": 1.0, "aggressive": 0.6 },
-    "scoring": { "base": 60, "per_gain": 20, "per_risk": 25 },
     "keyword_rules": [
       {
         "id": "kw_arbitration",
-        "keywords": ["arbitration"],
+        "keywords": [
+          "arbitration"
+        ],
         "effect": "arbitration_review_triggered",
         "anchor": "avoid",
         "when_forbidden": true
       },
       {
         "id": "kw_refund",
-        "keywords": ["refund"],
+        "keywords": [
+          "refund"
+        ],
         "effect": "fund_returned_to_buyer",
         "anchor": "prefer",
         "when_forbidden": false
       },
       {
         "id": "kw_upfront",
-        "keywords": ["upfront", "before delivery"],
+        "keywords": [
+          "upfront",
+          "before delivery"
+        ],
         "effect": "fund_released_to_merchant",
         "anchor": "avoid",
         "when_forbidden": true
       },
       {
         "id": "kw_milestone",
-        "keywords": ["milestone"],
+        "keywords": [
+          "milestone"
+        ],
         "effect": "node_advanced",
         "anchor": "prefer",
         "when_forbidden": false
@@ -149,67 +251,118 @@
     "arb": {
       "comment": "Arbitration 7-state game tunables — a PARALLEL case-lifecycle interest model (effects are about the dispute case, not the fund lifecycle; it shares only the appetite multiplier with the fund game). effect_semantics publishes the kernel effect vocabulary; keyword_rules re-anchor a perspective's prefer/avoid from persona red lines (an unconditional keyword entry is expressed as a pair with when_forbidden true AND false); scoring: favorability = clamp(base + per_gain × gains − per_risk × risks × sensitivity).",
       "effect_semantics": {
-        "case_advanced": ["the case moves forward"],
-        "case_extended": ["the case is prolonged — more cost and delay"],
-        "reversal_chance": ["a chance to overturn a ruling"],
-        "adverse_ruling": ["an unfavorable ruling lands"],
-        "case_closed": ["the case reaches a terminal state"],
-        "fees_received": ["fees or indemnity are collected"]
+        "case_advanced": [
+          "the case moves forward"
+        ],
+        "case_extended": [
+          "the case is prolonged — more cost and delay"
+        ],
+        "reversal_chance": [
+          "a chance to overturn a ruling"
+        ],
+        "adverse_ruling": [
+          "an unfavorable ruling lands"
+        ],
+        "case_closed": [
+          "the case reaches a terminal state"
+        ],
+        "fees_received": [
+          "fees or indemnity are collected"
+        ]
       },
       "role_interests": {
         "arbitrator": {
-          "prefer": ["case_advanced", "fees_received", "case_closed"],
-          "avoid": ["case_extended"],
-          "sensitivity": 1.0
+          "prefer": [
+            "case_advanced",
+            "fees_received",
+            "case_closed"
+          ],
+          "avoid": [
+            "case_extended"
+          ],
+          "sensitivity": 1
         },
         "customer": {
-          "prefer": ["reversal_chance", "case_closed"],
-          "avoid": ["adverse_ruling", "case_extended"],
-          "sensitivity": 1.0
+          "prefer": [
+            "reversal_chance",
+            "case_closed"
+          ],
+          "avoid": [
+            "adverse_ruling",
+            "case_extended"
+          ],
+          "sensitivity": 1
         },
         "merchant": {
-          "prefer": ["case_closed", "fees_received"],
-          "avoid": ["adverse_ruling", "reversal_chance", "case_extended"],
-          "sensitivity": 1.0
+          "prefer": [
+            "case_closed",
+            "fees_received"
+          ],
+          "avoid": [
+            "adverse_ruling",
+            "reversal_chance",
+            "case_extended"
+          ],
+          "sensitivity": 1
         }
       },
       "keyword_rules": [
         {
           "id": "arb_kw_arbitration_forbid",
-          "keywords": ["arbitration"],
+          "keywords": [
+            "arbitration"
+          ],
           "effect": "case_extended",
           "anchor": "avoid",
           "when_forbidden": true
         },
         {
           "id": "arb_kw_refund",
-          "keywords": ["refund"],
+          "keywords": [
+            "refund"
+          ],
           "effect": "reversal_chance",
           "anchor": "prefer",
           "when_forbidden": false
         },
         {
           "id": "arb_kw_prolong",
-          "keywords": ["prolong", "delay"],
+          "keywords": [
+            "prolong",
+            "delay"
+          ],
           "effect": "case_extended",
           "anchor": "avoid",
           "when_forbidden": false
         },
         {
           "id": "arb_kw_prolong_forbid",
-          "keywords": ["prolong", "delay"],
+          "keywords": [
+            "prolong",
+            "delay"
+          ],
           "effect": "case_extended",
           "anchor": "avoid",
           "when_forbidden": true
         }
       ],
       "forbid_pattern": "forbid|never|\\bno\\b",
-      "scoring": { "base": 60, "per_gain": 20, "per_risk": 25 }
+      "scoring": {
+        "base": 60,
+        "per_gain": 20,
+        "per_risk": 25
+      }
     }
   },
   "match": {
     "comment": "Demand↔service matching standing defaults (builtin evaluation 'demand_match'): region relation scores, per-dimension weights, trust bands and neutrality. A per-request UserInjection can still reweight or disable dimensions; trust_bands match FIRST entry whose min ≤ trust (keep descending order).",
-    "region_scores": { "exact": 100, "contains": 85, "compatible": 60, "overlap": 40, "mismatch": 0 },
+    "region_scores": {
+      "exact": 100,
+      "contains": 85,
+      "compatible": 60,
+      "overlap": 40,
+      "mismatch": 0
+    },
     "weights": {
       "region": 15,
       "industry": 20,
@@ -220,10 +373,22 @@
       "acceptance": 10
     },
     "trust_bands": [
-      { "min": 75, "score": 100 },
-      { "min": 50, "score": 60 },
-      { "min": 25, "score": 30 },
-      { "min": 0, "score": 0 }
+      {
+        "min": 75,
+        "score": 100
+      },
+      {
+        "min": 50,
+        "score": 60
+      },
+      {
+        "min": 25,
+        "score": 30
+      },
+      {
+        "min": 0,
+        "score": 0
+      }
     ],
     "neutral_score": 50,
     "price_over_budget_tolerance_pct": 10,
@@ -234,7 +399,7 @@
     "thresholds": {
       "progress_stall_hours": 0,
       "compensation_drop_ratio": 0.3,
-      "compensation_coverage_min": 1.0,
+      "compensation_coverage_min": 1,
       "messenger_timeout_hours": 24,
       "review_window_closing_days": 3,
       "arb_window_closing_days": 3
@@ -250,28 +415,139 @@
   "mode": {
     "comment": "Mode-evaluator posture: risk/benefit recommendation thresholds per risk appetite (merchant_guide evaluation preview). risk_benefit_ratio is computed by the kernel; only the posture thresholds are tunable here.",
     "appetite_thresholds": {
-      "conservative": { "max_risk": 30, "min_benefit": 50 },
-      "balanced": { "max_risk": 60, "min_benefit": 60 },
-      "aggressive": { "max_risk": 100, "min_benefit": 80 }
+      "conservative": {
+        "max_risk": 30,
+        "min_benefit": 50
+      },
+      "balanced": {
+        "max_risk": 60,
+        "min_benefit": 60
+      },
+      "aggressive": {
+        "max_risk": 100,
+        "min_benefit": 80
+      }
     }
   },
   "scorecard": {
     "comment": "Strategy scorecard numeric tuning (Q7 — one scoring document): per-metric posture weights and advisory good/bad scoring anchors, plus the shop-evidence gate. Catalog identity (source/unit/direction/labels) stays kernel-owned; only these numbers are data. Anchors: full score at/beyond good, zero at/beyond bad, linear between (direction lives in the good/bad ordering). A factory anchor can be retuned, never removed; metric ids can never be invented here. Shop-evidence gate BY DESIGN: document layers (user doc / persona / industry) can retune shop_evidence_metrics but can never EMPTY it — array merges never delete entries, so a numeric overall grade always demands at least one available own-commercial metric. To browse without the gate for one session, use a runtime override (config_operation judgment_set path scorecard.shop_evidence_metrics value []).",
     "metrics": {
-      "order_count": { "weight": { "volume": 0.2, "balanced": 0.15, "margin": 0.05 }, "good_threshold": 20, "bad_threshold": 5 },
-      "completed_count": { "weight": { "volume": 0.1, "balanced": 0.1, "margin": 0.1 } },
-      "completion_rate": { "weight": { "volume": 0.15, "balanced": 0.2, "margin": 0.15 }, "good_threshold": 0.9, "bad_threshold": 0.6 },
-      "repeat_customer_rate": { "weight": { "volume": 0.2, "balanced": 0.25, "margin": 0.2 }, "good_threshold": 0.25, "bad_threshold": 0.1 },
-      "dispute_rate": { "weight": { "volume": 0.1, "balanced": 0.15, "margin": 0.2 }, "good_threshold": 0.02, "bad_threshold": 0.05 },
-      "dd_to_order_rate": { "weight": { "volume": 0.15, "balanced": 0.1, "margin": 0.05 }, "good_threshold": 0.2, "bad_threshold": 0.05 },
-      "market_recent_orders": { "weight": { "volume": 0.05, "balanced": 0.02, "margin": 0.02 } },
-      "market_recent_gmv": { "weight": { "volume": 0.02, "balanced": 0.02, "margin": 0.02 } },
-      "supply_demand_ratio": { "weight": { "volume": 0.02, "balanced": 0.03, "margin": 0.05 }, "good_threshold": 1, "bad_threshold": 4 },
-      "market_active_services": { "weight": { "volume": 0.01, "balanced": 0.01, "margin": 0.01 } },
-      "competitor_count": { "weight": { "volume": 0.02, "balanced": 0.05, "margin": 0.1 }, "good_threshold": 5, "bad_threshold": 30 },
-      "category_enumerated_count": { "weight": { "volume": 0.02, "balanced": 0.05, "margin": 0.1 } },
-      "arbitration_trust_score": { "weight": { "volume": 0.05, "balanced": 0.1, "margin": 0.15 }, "good_threshold": 80, "bad_threshold": 50 },
-      "open_attention_count": { "weight": { "volume": 0.03, "balanced": 0.03, "margin": 0.05 }, "good_threshold": 0, "bad_threshold": 5 }
+      "order_count": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.2,
+          "balanced": 0.15,
+          "margin": 0.05
+        },
+        "good_threshold": 20,
+        "bad_threshold": 5
+      },
+      "completed_count": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.1,
+          "balanced": 0.1,
+          "margin": 0.1
+        }
+      },
+      "completion_rate": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.15,
+          "balanced": 0.2,
+          "margin": 0.15
+        },
+        "good_threshold": 0.9,
+        "bad_threshold": 0.6
+      },
+      "repeat_customer_rate": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.2,
+          "balanced": 0.25,
+          "margin": 0.2
+        },
+        "good_threshold": 0.25,
+        "bad_threshold": 0.1
+      },
+      "dispute_rate": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.1,
+          "balanced": 0.15,
+          "margin": 0.2
+        },
+        "good_threshold": 0.02,
+        "bad_threshold": 0.05
+      },
+      "dd_to_order_rate": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.15,
+          "balanced": 0.1,
+          "margin": 0.05
+        },
+        "good_threshold": 0.2,
+        "bad_threshold": 0.05
+      },
+      "market_recent_orders": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.05,
+          "balanced": 0.02,
+          "margin": 0.02
+        }
+      },
+      "market_recent_gmv": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.02,
+          "balanced": 0.02,
+          "margin": 0.02
+        }
+      },
+      "supply_demand_ratio": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.02,
+          "balanced": 0.03,
+          "margin": 0.05
+        },
+        "good_threshold": 1,
+        "bad_threshold": 4
+      },
+      "market_active_services": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.01,
+          "balanced": 0.01,
+          "margin": 0.01
+        }
+      },
+      "competitor_count": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.02,
+          "balanced": 0.05,
+          "margin": 0.1
+        },
+        "good_threshold": 5,
+        "bad_threshold": 30
+      },
+      "category_enumerated_count": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.02,
+          "balanced": 0.05,
+          "margin": 0.1
+        }
+      },
+      "arbitration_trust_score": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.05,
+          "balanced": 0.1,
+          "margin": 0.15
+        },
+        "good_threshold": 80,
+        "bad_threshold": 50
+      },
+      "open_attention_count": {
+        "weight": {
+          "volume": 0.03,
+          "balanced": 0.03,
+          "margin": 0.05
+        },
+        "good_threshold": 0,
+        "bad_threshold": 5
+      }
     },
     "shop_evidence_metrics": [
       "order_count",
@@ -285,5 +561,150 @@
   "rules": {
     "comment": "Declarative rule book. Factory rule packs live in knowledge/baselines/rules/<domain>.json and merge into this namespace at load time (Q11 split files, single document view). Override at rule granularity: retune levels/wording or disable with enabled=false (a trace is left) — factory rules can never be deleted or invented here.",
     "domains": {}
+  },
+  "role_intent": {
+    "comment": "Per-role intent profiles (L-A, ROLE-GAME-ARCHITECTURE). WHAT each ACTOR role pursues and HOW it decides: weighted intents (factory vocabulary — re-tune weights, never invent ids), risk appetite (feeds the game kernels), red lines (hard constraints), strategy leaning. Resolution chain: prompt/session > user document (this section) > persona drive > these factory seeds. neutral/system are NOT actors — they hold no intent by design.",
+    "roles": {
+      "merchant": {
+        "comment": "Fund-occupancy-minimizing settlement owner (ROLE_MODELS: strong producer).",
+        "intents": [
+          {
+            "id": "settlement_assurance",
+            "weight": 0.5
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "fund_efficiency",
+            "weight": 0.3
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "store_reputation",
+            "weight": 0.2
+          }
+        ],
+        "risk_appetite": "balanced",
+        "red_lines": [
+          "never promise auto-settlement — allocation needs an explicit trigger"
+        ],
+        "strategy_leaning": "opportunistic"
+      },
+      "customer": {
+        "comment": "Escrowed buyer seeking verified delivery (ROLE_MODELS: weak consumer).",
+        "intents": [
+          {
+            "id": "verified_delivery",
+            "weight": 0.5
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "refund_guarantee",
+            "weight": 0.3
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "privacy_minimal_disclosure",
+            "weight": 0.2
+          }
+        ],
+        "risk_appetite": "conservative",
+        "red_lines": [
+          "never confirm delivery before verifying the deliverable"
+        ],
+        "strategy_leaning": "cooperative"
+      },
+      "demander": {
+        "comment": "Demand publisher seeking qualified suppliers (ROLE_MODELS: weak consumer).",
+        "intents": [
+          {
+            "id": "qualified_award",
+            "weight": 0.5
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "selection_safety",
+            "weight": 0.3
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "recruitment_velocity",
+            "weight": 0.2
+          }
+        ],
+        "risk_appetite": "conservative",
+        "strategy_leaning": "cooperative"
+      },
+      "prospect": {
+        "comment": "Pre-purchase due-diligence posture (ROLE_MODELS: weak consumer).",
+        "intents": [
+          {
+            "id": "trust_discovery",
+            "weight": 0.6
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "purchase_safety",
+            "weight": 0.4
+          }
+        ],
+        "risk_appetite": "conservative",
+        "strategy_leaning": "cooperative"
+      },
+      "supplier": {
+        "comment": "Peer sub-order provider seeking settlement and continued participation.",
+        "intents": [
+          {
+            "id": "suborder_settlement",
+            "weight": 0.5
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "workflow_continuity",
+            "weight": 0.3
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "fair_terms",
+            "weight": 0.2
+          }
+        ],
+        "risk_appetite": "balanced",
+        "red_lines": [
+          "never present a service that cannot fulfill the sub-order"
+        ],
+        "strategy_leaning": "opportunistic"
+      },
+      "collaborator": {
+        "comment": "Process executor bound to its permission scope.",
+        "intents": [
+          {
+            "id": "in_scope_operation",
+            "weight": 0.6
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "no_liability",
+            "weight": 0.4
+          }
+        ],
+        "risk_appetite": "conservative",
+        "red_lines": [
+          "never operate outside the granted permission scope"
+        ],
+        "strategy_leaning": "cooperative"
+      },
+      "arbitrator": {
+        "comment": "Neutral case resolver seeking fees and clean cases (independent commercial actor).",
+        "intents": [
+          {
+            "id": "clean_resolution",
+            "weight": 0.5
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "fee_realization",
+            "weight": 0.3
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "capped_liability",
+            "weight": 0.2
+          }
+        ],
+        "risk_appetite": "conservative",
+        "red_lines": [
+          "never rule without examining both sides' evidence"
+        ],
+        "strategy_leaning": "cooperative"
+      }
+    }
   }
 }