@willcgage/module-schematic 0.77.0 → 0.79.0

package/dist/index.cjs

@@ -1413,9 +1413,29 @@ var ATLAS_CODE55_N = [
     partNumbers: { single: "2056" },
     frogNumber: 2.5,
     lead: {
-      inches: 2.5 * TURNOUT_LEAD_INCHES_PER_FROG,
-      source: "derived",
-      note: "scaled from the measured #7 by frog number \u2014 not measured"
+      inches: 2.5,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2056, 2026-07-26: points at 1\u2075\u2044\u2088\u2033, frog at 4\u215B\u2033 \u21D2 2.5\u2033 \u2014 the difference of the two offsets, per the rule above. \u26A0\uFE0F RETIRES a `derived` 1.205\u2033 (2.5 \xD7 TURNOUT_LEAD_INCHES_PER_FROG) \u2014 the real lead is more than DOUBLE it. Third independent refutation of the per-frog rule, and the largest: at low N it is not merely mis-sloped, it is nowhere near."
+    },
+    pointsOffset: {
+      inches: 1.625,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2056 \u2014 end of tie strip to point tips (1\xB9\u2070\u2044\u2081\u2086\u2033)"
+    },
+    frogOffset: {
+      inches: 4.125,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2056 \u2014 tie end to the apex of the V (4\xB2\u2044\u2081\u2086\u2033)"
+    },
+    overallLength: {
+      inches: 6.5,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2056 \u2014 end to end"
+    },
+    divergingLength: {
+      inches: 2.4375,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2056 \u2014 frog to the end of each diverging rail (2\u2077\u2044\u2081\u2086\u2033, both legs equal). \u2714 CROSS-CHECKS the frog: axial past-frog is 6.5 \u2212 4.125 = 2.375\u2033, and the rail is \xB9\u2044\u2081\u2086\u2033 longer than its own projection, which is the right sign and the right order of magnitude."
     }
   },
   {
@@ -1423,11 +1443,17 @@ var ATLAS_CODE55_N = [
     // wyes are different FROG NUMBERS, not a left/right pair of one part. The
     // 2056 half of that confirms the entry above; this is the one we didn't have.
     //
-    // No lead. The #2.5's is `derived` from a per-frog rule its own note records
-    // as refuted, so it rests on nothing — repeating that for a second part
-    // would be exactly how a number nobody checked becomes two. Without one,
-    // `leadInchesForSize` interpolates across the MEASURED parts at the wye's
-    // effective frog (3.5 × 2 = 7), which lands on the measured #7.
+    // Fully measured 2026-07-26, after one reading was caught and re-read.
+    //
+    // ⚠️ WORKED EXAMPLE OF WHY THIS LIBRARY CROSS-CHECKS. The frog first came in
+    // at 5⁵⁄₃₂″, which is PAST the part's own 5″ overall length — the apex would
+    // have sat beyond the end of the moulding. Two independent lines said ~3⅛″:
+    //   · points ¾″ + points→frog 2⅜″           = 3.125″
+    //   · overall 5″ − diverging rail 1³⁰⁄₃₂″    ≈ 3.06″ axial
+    // Queried, and Will re-read it as 3⁵⁄₃₂″ — a leading-digit slip, exactly what
+    // the arithmetic implied. That re-read is the number recorded here; it was
+    // NOT inferred. Had it been taken at face value the wye would have drawn its
+    // frog off the end of itself.
     id: "atlas-c55-n-wye-35",
     manufacturer: "Atlas",
     line: "Code 55",
@@ -1435,7 +1461,32 @@ var ATLAS_CODE55_N = [
     name: "#3.5 Wye",
     kind: "wye",
     partNumbers: { single: "2057" },
-    frogNumber: 3.5
+    frogNumber: 3.5,
+    lead: {
+      inches: 2.40625,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2057, 2026-07-26: points at \xBE\u2033, frog at 3\u2075\u2044\u2083\u2082\u2033 \u21D2 2.40625\u2033 \u2014 the difference of the two offsets, per the rule above. His direct points\u2192frog reading was 2\u215C\u2033, \xB9\u2044\u2083\u2082\u2033 short; the offsets win. \u26A0\uFE0F RETIRES the reasoning in this entry's original note, which left the lead unset so `leadInchesForSize` would interpolate at the wye's effective frog (3.5 \xD7 2 = 7) and land on the measured #7's 3.59375\u2033. That substitution was 49% over."
+    },
+    pointsOffset: {
+      inches: 0.75,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2057 \u2014 end of tie strip to point tips (\xBE\u2033)"
+    },
+    frogOffset: {
+      inches: 3.15625,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2057 \u2014 tie end to the apex of the V (3\u2075\u2044\u2083\u2082\u2033). This is his RE-READ after the first reading (5\u2075\u2044\u2083\u2082\u2033) was queried for landing past the part's 5\u2033 end; see the comment above this entry."
+    },
+    overallLength: {
+      inches: 5,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2057 \u2014 end to end"
+    },
+    divergingLength: {
+      inches: 1.9375,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2057 \u2014 frog to the end of each diverging rail (1\xB3\u2070\u2044\u2083\u2082\u2033, both legs equal). \u2714 THE READING THAT CAUGHT THE BAD FROG: against the first 5\u2075\u2044\u2083\u2082\u2033 the axial past-frog is NEGATIVE, which a 1.9375\u2033 rail flatly contradicts. Against the re-read 3\u2075\u2044\u2083\u2082\u2033 it is 5 \u2212 3.15625 = 1.84375\u2033, so the rail runs \xB3\u2044\u2083\u2082\u2033 longer than its own projection \u2014 right sign, same order as the 2056's \xB9\u2044\u2081\u2086\u2033. (The two differ because this is a cos() residual on a small angle, which is why the field doc says not to read an angle back out of it.)"
+    }
   },
   {
     id: "atlas-c55-n-curved-21-15",
@@ -1791,6 +1842,8 @@ function storedPartToTrackPart(row) {
   if (frog) part.frogOffset = frog;
   const overall = dim(row.overallLengthInches, row.overallLengthSource);
   if (overall) part.overallLength = overall;
+  const diverging = dim(row.divergingLengthInches, row.divergingLengthSource);
+  if (diverging) part.divergingLength = diverging;
   if (lead) part.lead = lead;
   const outer = dim(row.outerRadiusInches, row.radiusSource);
   const inner = dim(row.innerRadiusInches, row.radiusSource);