@willcgage/module-schematic 0.52.0 → 0.54.0

package/dist/index.cjs

@@ -1104,9 +1104,24 @@ var ATLAS_CODE55_N = [
     partNumbers: { left: "2050", right: "2051" },
     frogNumber: 5,
     lead: {
-      inches: 5 * TURNOUT_LEAD_INCHES_PER_FROG,
-      source: "derived",
-      note: "scaled from the measured #7 by frog number \u2014 not measured"
+      inches: 3,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2050 (#5 LH): points at 1\xBE\u2033, frog at 4.75\u2033 \u21D2 3\u2033 exactly. REFUTED BOTH standing models \u2014 the per-frog rule predicted 2.41\u2033, the constant-switch-angle model 2.64\u2033; both read short. It also retired my earlier ~2.4\u2033 photo estimate, which was 20% under."
+    },
+    pointsOffset: {
+      inches: 1.75,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2050 (#5 LH) \u2014 end of tie strip to point tips"
+    },
+    overallLength: {
+      inches: 6,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2050 (#5 LH), end tie to end tie"
+    },
+    actualAngle: {
+      deg: 11.25,
+      source: "unverified",
+      note: "CORROBORATED: XTrkCAD N-atlasn55.xtp gives 11.250152\xB0, and AnyRail-forum trial-and-error (glakedylan, 2012) gives 11.25\xB0. Theory atan(1/5) = 11.310\xB0. 11.25\xB0 is exactly 1/32 turn \u2014 Atlas appear to build to sectional angles."
     }
   },
   {
@@ -1122,6 +1137,16 @@ var ATLAS_CODE55_N = [
       inches: 3.375,
       source: "measured",
       note: "Steve Branton, physical Atlas code 55 #7, 3\u215C\u2033 points\u2192frog (#173)"
+    },
+    overallLength: {
+      inches: 6,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2052 (#7), end tie to end tie \u2014 the SAME 6\u2033 as the #5, which is what proves length is not a function of frog number"
+    },
+    actualAngle: {
+      deg: 8.13,
+      source: "unverified",
+      note: "DISPUTED: XTrkCAD .xtp says 8.1818\xB0, AnyRail forum says 8.125\xB0, theory atan(1/7) = 8.130\xB0. The sources disagree, so theory is used here."
     }
   },
   {
@@ -1134,9 +1159,24 @@ var ATLAS_CODE55_N = [
     partNumbers: { left: "2054", right: "2055" },
     frogNumber: 10,
     lead: {
-      inches: 10 * TURNOUT_LEAD_INCHES_PER_FROG,
-      source: "derived",
-      note: "scaled from the measured #7 by frog number \u2014 not measured"
+      inches: 4.1875,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2054 (#10): points at 9/16\u2033 from the end, frog at 4.75\u2033 \u21D2 4\xB3\u2044\u2081\u2086\u2033. THIS IS THE MEASUREMENT THAT REFUTED the lead-per-frog rule \u2014 it predicted 4.82\u2033, 13% over."
+    },
+    pointsOffset: {
+      inches: 0.5625,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2054 (#10) \u2014 end of tie strip to point tips"
+    },
+    overallLength: {
+      inches: 8,
+      source: "measured",
+      note: "Will Gage, physical Atlas 2054 (#10), end tie to end tie"
+    },
+    actualAngle: {
+      deg: 5.74,
+      source: "unverified",
+      note: "CORROBORATED: XTrkCAD .xtp gives 5.739\xB0, AnyRail forum 5.75\xB0 \u2014 they agree with each other and not with theory atan(1/10) = 5.711\xB0."
     }
   },
   {