@wendellresearch-ai/benchwarmers 0.2.0 → 0.2.2

package/package.json

@@ -1,65 +1,69 @@
-{
-  "name": "@wendellresearch-ai/benchwarmers",
-  "version": "0.2.0",
-  "description": "Self-hosted panel gateway for LLMs: ask a collection of models at once, keep every answer side by side, rotate explorer models in, and let your verdicts pick the next panel.",
-  "license": "MIT",
-  "author": "Wendell Research",
-  "homepage": "https://github.com/WendellResearch-AI/benchwarmers#readme",
-  "repository": {
-    "type": "git",
-    "url": "git+https://github.com/WendellResearch-AI/benchwarmers.git"
-  },
-  "bugs": {
-    "url": "https://github.com/WendellResearch-AI/benchwarmers/issues"
-  },
-  "keywords": [
-    "llm",
-    "llm-gateway",
-    "openai-compatible",
-    "multi-model",
-    "code-review",
-    "llm-evaluation",
-    "benchmark",
-    "model-routing",
-    "self-hosted",
-    "open-webui",
-    "openrouter",
-    "litellm"
-  ],
-  "bin": {
-    "benchwarmers": "bin/benchwarmers.js"
-  },
-  "files": [
-    "bin/",
-    "serve.py",
-    "gateway.py",
-    "mcp_server.py",
-    "metrics/*.py",
-    "scripts/*.py",
-    "suite/*.py",
-    "suite/*.md",
-    "suite/*.json",
-    "suite/tasks/",
-    "perf/*.py",
-    "perf/*.md",
-    "repoqa/*.py",
-    "repoqa/*.md",
-    "ui/",
-    "examples/",
-    "VERSION",
-    "NOTICE",
-    "AGENTS.md",
-    "BENCHMARKS.md",
-    "GATEWAY.md",
-    "PRIVACY.md",
-    "SECURITY.md",
-    "TERMS.md",
-    "USAGE.md"
-  ],
-  "engines": {
-    "node": ">=18"
-  },
-  "publishConfig": {
-    "access": "public"
-  }
-}
+{
+  "name": "@wendellresearch-ai/benchwarmers",
+  "version": "0.2.2",
+  "description": "Self-hosted panel gateway for LLMs: ask a collection of models at once, keep every answer side by side, rotate explorer models in, and let your verdicts pick the next panel.",
+  "mcpName": "io.github.WendellResearch-AI/benchwarmers",
+  "license": "MIT",
+  "author": "Wendell Research",
+  "homepage": "https://github.com/WendellResearch-AI/benchwarmers#readme",
+  "repository": {
+    "type": "git",
+    "url": "git+https://github.com/WendellResearch-AI/benchwarmers.git"
+  },
+  "bugs": {
+    "url": "https://github.com/WendellResearch-AI/benchwarmers/issues"
+  },
+  "keywords": [
+    "llm",
+    "llm-gateway",
+    "openai-compatible",
+    "multi-model",
+    "code-review",
+    "llm-evaluation",
+    "benchmark",
+    "model-routing",
+    "self-hosted",
+    "open-webui",
+    "openrouter",
+    "litellm"
+  ],
+  "bin": {
+    "benchwarmers": "bin/benchwarmers.js",
+    "bench": "bin/benchwarmers.js"
+  },
+  "files": [
+    "bin/",
+    "launcher.py",
+    "serve.py",
+    "gateway.py",
+    "mcp_server.py",
+    "cli.py",
+    "metrics/*.py",
+    "scripts/*.py",
+    "suite/*.py",
+    "suite/*.md",
+    "suite/*.json",
+    "suite/tasks/",
+    "perf/*.py",
+    "perf/*.md",
+    "repoqa/*.py",
+    "repoqa/*.md",
+    "ui/",
+    "examples/",
+    "VERSION",
+    "NOTICE",
+    "AGENTS.md",
+    "BENCHMARKS.md",
+    "GATEWAY.md",
+    "PRIVACY.md",
+    "SECURITY.md",
+    "TERMS.md",
+    "USAGE.md"
+  ],
+  "engines": {
+    "node": ">=18"
+  },
+  "publishConfig": {
+    "access": "public"
+  }
+}

package/perf/README.md

@@ -1,89 +1,89 @@
-# The performance tier
-
-What the **serving path** does, tracked over time. Not what the models are
-worth — that is `suite/`.
-
-Latency through Open WebUI to whichever provider is behind it depends on
-congestion, rate limits, routing and the hour of the day. None of those are
-properties of a model, and all of them decide whether an offload is worth
-making right now.
-
-## One reading is weather; the history is climate
-
-Every run appends to `history.csv` rather than overwriting a report. A single
-number here is close to meaningless — the first run recorded a p95 of 44.5 s
-against a p50 of 11.6 s on the *same* prompt, entirely from one cold first
-call. A p50 that doubles over a month is a real finding. A p50 that is 40%
-higher this afternoon is a Tuesday.
-
-The runner prints a `(+N% vs <date>)` marker against the previous reading, and
-says `(steady)` inside ±15%, so the comparison is made for you rather than left
-in a spreadsheet.
-
-## What is recorded, and why each
-
-| Column | Why |
-| --- | --- |
-| `p50_s`, `p95_s` | **Not the mean.** One timeout drags a mean into fiction. p95 is where rate limiting shows itself, and rate limiting is what makes a model unusable while looking fine on average |
-| `chars_per_s` | Throughput, from the **large prompt only** |
-| `answered` / `refused` / `error` / `timeout` | Four columns, never one. A safety filter, an overloaded service and a slow model are three different facts, and collapsing them is the mistake this repo was built around |
-| `timestamp` | The whole point is the trend |
-
-**Two prompt sizes, because they measure different things.** The tiny prompt
-asks for one word and measures the FLOOR — connection, queueing, cold start.
-The large one is 18 KB and measures THROUGHPUT. The first run made the case
-better than the design did: the 18 KB prompt came back in 9.0 s and the
-one-word prompt took 11.6 s. Latency to these models is overhead, not
-generation.
-
-**Throughput is not recorded for the tiny prompt.** Six characters over ten
-seconds is 0.5 ch/s, which reads as a catastrophically slow model and is
-really connection overhead with a one-word answer attached. A number that
-invites the wrong reading is worse than no number.
-
-**Characters, not tokens.** The `llm` CLI does not report token counts for
-these endpoints. Chars/s is a proxy, it is affected by how verbose a model is,
-and saying so is better than publishing something that looks like tokens/s and
-is not.
-
-## Running it
-
-```bash
-# All default models, both prompt sizes, 5 samples each.
-.venv/Scripts/python.exe perf/run.py
-
-# One model, quick availability check.
-.venv/Scripts/python.exe perf/run.py --model gemini-flash-3.8 -n 3 --tiny-only
-```
-
-Worth running on a schedule — weekly is enough to see drift — and again
-whenever a model starts feeling slow, so the feeling can be checked against a
-number.
-
-## One caveat: not every model takes the same path
-
-`inkling-free` and `inkling-small-free` are called **directly at OpenRouter**,
-because Open WebUI cannot relay them (see `runs/2026-09-04-registry-second-pass.md`).
-Everything else goes through Open WebUI first.
-
-That is one fewer hop, and it shows: `inkling-small-free` measured **245 ch/s**
-against 88.7 for the next fastest. **Part of that gap is the path, not the
-model** — which is exactly what this tier is named for. Do not read it as a
-threefold quality difference; read it as the relay costing something.
-
-The right comparison for these two is against each other, or against their own
-history over time.
-
-## How much this should count
-
-**Least of the three tiers.** `suite/` decides which model to use, `floor/`
-says whether one is broken, and this is a tiebreaker plus a veto for the
-extreme cases. Differences of seconds are a wash — waiting is cheap and a
-confident wrong answer is not. Speed only overrules capability when a model is
-slow enough to change how you work.
-
-## What this cannot tell you
-
-Whether a model is any good. The fastest model here can still invent an API
-that does not exist. That is what `suite/` is for, and the two should never be
-read as one ranking.
+# The performance tier
+
+What the **serving path** does, tracked over time. Not what the models are
+worth — that is `suite/`.
+
+Latency through Open WebUI to whichever provider is behind it depends on
+congestion, rate limits, routing and the hour of the day. None of those are
+properties of a model, and all of them decide whether an offload is worth
+making right now.
+
+## One reading is weather; the history is climate
+
+Every run appends to `history.csv` rather than overwriting a report. A single
+number here is close to meaningless — the first run recorded a p95 of 44.5 s
+against a p50 of 11.6 s on the *same* prompt, entirely from one cold first
+call. A p50 that doubles over a month is a real finding. A p50 that is 40%
+higher this afternoon is a Tuesday.
+
+The runner prints a `(+N% vs <date>)` marker against the previous reading, and
+says `(steady)` inside ±15%, so the comparison is made for you rather than left
+in a spreadsheet.
+
+## What is recorded, and why each
+
+| Column | Why |
+| --- | --- |
+| `p50_s`, `p95_s` | **Not the mean.** One timeout drags a mean into fiction. p95 is where rate limiting shows itself, and rate limiting is what makes a model unusable while looking fine on average |
+| `chars_per_s` | Throughput, from the **large prompt only** |
+| `answered` / `refused` / `error` / `timeout` | Four columns, never one. A safety filter, an overloaded service and a slow model are three different facts, and collapsing them is the mistake this repo was built around |
+| `timestamp` | The whole point is the trend |
+
+**Two prompt sizes, because they measure different things.** The tiny prompt
+asks for one word and measures the FLOOR — connection, queueing, cold start.
+The large one is 18 KB and measures THROUGHPUT. The first run made the case
+better than the design did: the 18 KB prompt came back in 9.0 s and the
+one-word prompt took 11.6 s. Latency to these models is overhead, not
+generation.
+
+**Throughput is not recorded for the tiny prompt.** Six characters over ten
+seconds is 0.5 ch/s, which reads as a catastrophically slow model and is
+really connection overhead with a one-word answer attached. A number that
+invites the wrong reading is worse than no number.
+
+**Characters, not tokens.** The `llm` CLI does not report token counts for
+these endpoints. Chars/s is a proxy, it is affected by how verbose a model is,
+and saying so is better than publishing something that looks like tokens/s and
+is not.
+
+## Running it
+
+```bash
+# All default models, both prompt sizes, 5 samples each.
+.venv/Scripts/python.exe perf/run.py
+
+# One model, quick availability check.
+.venv/Scripts/python.exe perf/run.py --model gemini-flash-3.8 -n 3 --tiny-only
+```
+
+Worth running on a schedule — weekly is enough to see drift — and again
+whenever a model starts feeling slow, so the feeling can be checked against a
+number.
+
+## One caveat: not every model takes the same path
+
+`inkling-free` and `inkling-small-free` are called **directly at OpenRouter**,
+because Open WebUI cannot relay them (see `runs/2026-09-04-registry-second-pass.md`).
+Everything else goes through Open WebUI first.
+
+That is one fewer hop, and it shows: `inkling-small-free` measured **245 ch/s**
+against 88.7 for the next fastest. **Part of that gap is the path, not the
+model** — which is exactly what this tier is named for. Do not read it as a
+threefold quality difference; read it as the relay costing something.
+
+The right comparison for these two is against each other, or against their own
+history over time.
+
+## How much this should count
+
+**Least of the three tiers.** `suite/` decides which model to use, `floor/`
+says whether one is broken, and this is a tiebreaker plus a veto for the
+extreme cases. Differences of seconds are a wash — waiting is cheap and a
+confident wrong answer is not. Speed only overrules capability when a model is
+slow enough to change how you work.
+
+## What this cannot tell you
+
+Whether a model is any good. The fastest model here can still invent an API
+that does not exist. That is what `suite/` is for, and the two should never be
+read as one ranking.