@wemake.cx/sequential-thinking 0.2.12 → 0.4.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +46 -119
- package/dist/index.js +386 -341
- package/dist/types/index.d.ts +81 -1
- package/package.json +10 -12
- package/dist/index.js.map +0 -70
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -9,72 +9,43 @@ The Sequential Thinking server addresses limitations in language models' ability
|
|
|
9
9
|
across complex, multi-step problems. It provides a framework for systematic thought progression, ensuring logical
|
|
10
10
|
consistency and context preservation throughout extended reasoning processes.
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
12
|
+
## Architecture: Code Mode
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
This server follows the "Code Mode" architecture, exposing a strict TypeScript API that allows LLMs to interact with the
|
|
15
|
+
thinking process directly via code, rather than just through JSON-RPC tool calls. This enables more complex, stateful,
|
|
16
|
+
and performant interactions.
|
|
13
17
|
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
18
|
+
### Core Concepts
|
|
15
19
|
|
|
16
20
|
- **Step-by-step progression**: Systematic breakdown of complex problems into manageable sequential steps
|
|
17
|
-
- **Logical dependencies**: Clear relationships between reasoning steps and conclusions
|
|
18
21
|
- **Context preservation**: Maintaining coherent context throughout multi-step processes
|
|
19
22
|
- **Iterative refinement**: Support for revising and improving reasoning chains based on new insights
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
#### Reasoning Approaches
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
- **Analytical**: Systematic, logical analysis with clear cause-and-effect relationships
|
|
24
|
-
- **Creative**: Exploratory thinking with divergent and convergent phases
|
|
25
|
-
- **Diagnostic**: Problem identification and solution development through systematic elimination
|
|
26
|
-
- **Strategic**: Long-term planning with sequential decision points and contingencies
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
#### Thought Validation
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
- **Consistency checking**: Ensuring logical coherence across reasoning chains
|
|
31
|
-
- **Assumption tracking**: Identifying and validating underlying assumptions
|
|
32
|
-
- **Evidence evaluation**: Assessing the strength of supporting evidence for each step
|
|
33
|
-
- **Alternative consideration**: Exploring alternative reasoning paths and conclusions
|
|
23
|
+
- **Branching**: Support for exploring alternative lines of reasoning
|
|
34
24
|
|
|
35
25
|
## Capabilities
|
|
36
26
|
|
|
37
27
|
### Tools
|
|
38
28
|
|
|
39
|
-
#### `
|
|
29
|
+
#### `sequentialthinking`
|
|
40
30
|
|
|
41
31
|
Structured sequential thinking tool for complex reasoning tasks.
|
|
42
32
|
|
|
43
33
|
**Input Schema:**
|
|
44
34
|
|
|
45
|
-
```
|
|
46
|
-
{
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
"alternatives": ["string - Alternative approaches or interpretations"]
|
|
57
|
-
}
|
|
58
|
-
],
|
|
59
|
-
"framework": "string - Reasoning approach (analytical|creative|diagnostic|strategic)",
|
|
60
|
-
"stage": "string - Current stage (problem-definition|analysis|synthesis|evaluation|conclusion)",
|
|
61
|
-
"iteration": "number - Current iteration number",
|
|
62
|
-
"confidence": "number - Overall confidence in reasoning chain (0.0-1.0)",
|
|
63
|
-
"nextThoughtNeeded": "boolean - Whether additional thoughts are required",
|
|
64
|
-
"suggestedNextSteps": ["string - Recommended next reasoning steps"]
|
|
35
|
+
```typescript
|
|
36
|
+
interface ThoughtData {
|
|
37
|
+
thought: string; // The current thinking step
|
|
38
|
+
thoughtNumber: number; // Current step number
|
|
39
|
+
totalThoughts: number; // Estimated total steps
|
|
40
|
+
nextThoughtNeeded: boolean; // Whether more steps are needed
|
|
41
|
+
isRevision?: boolean; // Is this revising a previous thought?
|
|
42
|
+
revisesThought?: number; // Which thought is being revised
|
|
43
|
+
branchFromThought?: number; // Branching point
|
|
44
|
+
branchId?: string; // Branch identifier
|
|
45
|
+
needsMoreThoughts?: boolean; // If more thoughts are needed than estimated
|
|
65
46
|
}
|
|
66
47
|
```
|
|
67
48
|
|
|
68
|
-
**Output:** Structured reasoning analysis with validated thought progression, logical consistency assessment, and
|
|
69
|
-
recommendations for next steps.
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
**Error Cases:**
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
- Invalid framework type
|
|
74
|
-
- Missing required reasoning steps
|
|
75
|
-
- Logical inconsistencies in thought progression
|
|
76
|
-
- Insufficient evidence for conclusions
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
49
|
## Setup
|
|
79
50
|
|
|
80
51
|
### bunx
|
|
@@ -84,88 +55,44 @@ recommendations for next steps.
|
|
|
84
55
|
"mcpServers": {
|
|
85
56
|
"Sequential Thinking": {
|
|
86
57
|
"command": "bunx",
|
|
87
|
-
"args": ["
|
|
58
|
+
"args": ["@wemake.cx/sequential-thinking@latest"]
|
|
88
59
|
}
|
|
89
60
|
}
|
|
90
61
|
}
|
|
91
62
|
```
|
|
92
63
|
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
64
|
+
## Usage
|
|
94
65
|
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
- `VALIDATION_STRICTNESS`: Set validation level ("lenient" | "standard" | "strict", default: "standard")
|
|
97
|
-
- `FRAMEWORK_FLEXIBILITY`: Allow framework switching mid-process ("true" | "false", default: "true")
|
|
98
|
-
- `CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD`: Minimum confidence for step acceptance (default: "0.6")
|
|
66
|
+
### Code Mode (Recommended)
|
|
99
67
|
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
68
|
+
LLMs can use the TypeScript API directly for better performance and type safety:
|
|
101
69
|
|
|
102
|
-
```
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
-
1. Break down complex problems into logical, sequential steps
|
|
106
|
-
2. Maintain coherent reasoning chains with clear dependencies
|
|
107
|
-
3. Validate assumptions and evidence at each step
|
|
108
|
-
4. Consider alternative approaches and interpretations
|
|
109
|
-
5. Provide confidence assessments for each reasoning step
|
|
110
|
-
6. Suggest next steps for continued analysis
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
Always specify the reasoning framework that best fits the problem type:
|
|
70
|
+
```typescript
|
|
71
|
+
import { SequentialThinking } from "@wemake.cx/sequential-thinking";
|
|
113
72
|
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
- Creative: For exploratory and innovative thinking
|
|
116
|
-
- Diagnostic: For problem identification and troubleshooting
|
|
117
|
-
- Strategic: For long-term planning and decision-making
|
|
73
|
+
const thinker = new SequentialThinking();
|
|
118
74
|
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
75
|
+
// Step 1: Initial thought
|
|
76
|
+
thinker.think({
|
|
77
|
+
thought: "Analyzing the user's request to migrate to Code Mode",
|
|
78
|
+
thoughtNumber: 1,
|
|
79
|
+
totalThoughts: 3,
|
|
80
|
+
nextThoughtNeeded: true
|
|
81
|
+
});
|
|
121
82
|
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
83
|
+
// Step 2: Detailed planning
|
|
84
|
+
thinker.think({
|
|
85
|
+
thought: "I need to separate the Core logic from the MCP transport layer",
|
|
86
|
+
thoughtNumber: 2,
|
|
87
|
+
totalThoughts: 3,
|
|
88
|
+
nextThoughtNeeded: true
|
|
89
|
+
});
|
|
123
90
|
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
130
|
-
step: 1,
|
|
131
|
-
content: "Define the target market characteristics and size",
|
|
132
|
-
reasoning: "Understanding the market is fundamental to any entry strategy",
|
|
133
|
-
assumptions: ["Small businesses are defined as 1-50 employees", "SaaS adoption is growing in this segment"],
|
|
134
|
-
evidence: [
|
|
135
|
-
"Market research shows 32M small businesses in target regions",
|
|
136
|
-
"SaaS adoption rate of 73% among small businesses"
|
|
137
|
-
],
|
|
138
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
139
|
-
alternatives: ["Focus on micro-businesses (<10 employees)", "Target specific industries first"]
|
|
140
|
-
},
|
|
141
|
-
{
|
|
142
|
-
step: 2,
|
|
143
|
-
content: "Analyze competitive landscape and positioning opportunities",
|
|
144
|
-
reasoning: "Competitive analysis reveals differentiation opportunities and market gaps",
|
|
145
|
-
assumptions: ["Current solutions have identifiable weaknesses", "Price sensitivity varies by business size"],
|
|
146
|
-
evidence: ["Top 3 competitors have 45% market share", "Customer reviews indicate pain points in user experience"],
|
|
147
|
-
confidence: 0.75,
|
|
148
|
-
alternatives: ["Blue ocean strategy", "Direct competition with feature superiority"]
|
|
149
|
-
},
|
|
150
|
-
{
|
|
151
|
-
step: 3,
|
|
152
|
-
content: "Evaluate go-to-market channel options",
|
|
153
|
-
reasoning: "Channel strategy determines reach, cost, and scalability of market entry",
|
|
154
|
-
assumptions: ["Digital channels are most cost-effective", "Small businesses prefer self-service onboarding"],
|
|
155
|
-
evidence: ["70% of small businesses research software online", "Self-service reduces CAC by 60%"],
|
|
156
|
-
confidence: 0.7,
|
|
157
|
-
alternatives: ["Partner channel strategy", "Hybrid direct + partner approach", "Pure direct sales model"]
|
|
158
|
-
}
|
|
159
|
-
],
|
|
160
|
-
framework: "strategic",
|
|
161
|
-
stage: "analysis",
|
|
162
|
-
iteration: 1,
|
|
163
|
-
confidence: 0.75,
|
|
164
|
-
nextThoughtNeeded: true,
|
|
165
|
-
suggestedNextSteps: [
|
|
166
|
-
"Develop pricing strategy based on market analysis",
|
|
167
|
-
"Create detailed implementation timeline",
|
|
168
|
-
"Identify key success metrics and milestones"
|
|
169
|
-
]
|
|
91
|
+
// Step 3: Execution
|
|
92
|
+
thinker.think({
|
|
93
|
+
thought: "Implementation complete. Verifying tests.",
|
|
94
|
+
thoughtNumber: 3,
|
|
95
|
+
totalThoughts: 3,
|
|
96
|
+
nextThoughtNeeded: false
|
|
170
97
|
});
|
|
171
98
|
```
|