@webpresso/plugin-codex 0.0.10 → 0.0.11

package/skills/verify/SKILL.md

@@ -41,18 +41,18 @@ the preferred skill (`claude` / `codex` / `grok` / one OpenCode Go), then stops.
 
 ## Tooling map
 
-| Gate                      | Prefer                                                                                  |
-| ------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
-| Lint / types / tests / QA | `wp_lint`, `wp_typecheck`, `wp_test`, `wp_qa`                                           |
-| Format                    | `wp_format`                                                                             |
-| Audits                    | `wp_audit`, `wp_audits`                                                                 |
-| Blueprint                 | blueprint MCP tools + `wp_audit`                                                        |
-| PR / CI wait              | `wp_pr_status`, `wp_pr_wait` (not multi-sleep loops)                                    |
-| Release                   | `wp_release_progress` for live Release phases; `wp_release_readiness` for package gates |
-| Large output              | `wp_session_execute` / `batch_execute` / `execute_file`                                 |
-| Continuity                | `wp_session_capture` for verify summary; avoid paste-back walls                         |
-| E2E / act                 | `wp_e2e`, `wp_ci_act` when the change requires them                                     |
-| Outside authority         | `wp_review_gate` for plans; `wp_review_run` for implementation                          |
+| Gate                      | Prefer                                                                                                  |
+| ------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| Lint / types / tests / QA | `wp_lint`, `wp_typecheck`, `wp_test`, `wp_qa`                                                           |
+| Format                    | `wp_format`                                                                                             |
+| Audits                    | `wp_audit`, `wp_audits`                                                                                 |
+| Blueprint                 | blueprint MCP tools + `wp_audit`                                                                        |
+| PR / CI wait              | `wp_pr_status`, `wp_pr_wait` (not multi-sleep loops)                                                    |
+| Release                   | `wp_release_progress` for live Release phases; `wp_release_readiness` for package gates                 |
+| Large output              | `wp_session_execute` / `batch_execute` / `execute_file`                                                 |
+| Continuity                | `wp_session_capture` for verify summary; avoid paste-back walls                                         |
+| E2E / act                 | `wp_e2e`, `wp_ci_act` when the change requires them                                                     |
+| Outside authority         | `wp_review_gate` (authoritative) for plans; `wp_review_gate` with `mode: "advisory"` for implementation |
 
 ## Iron law — evidence before claims
 
@@ -263,17 +263,33 @@ Do not substitute mutable branch names for authority when the audit needs a SHA.
 SSOT: `evaluateSensitiveReviewPolicy` in `src/review/sensitive-review-policy.ts`;
 CI job in `.github/workflows/pr-policy.yml`.
 
-### 2. Sensitive → delivery until satisfied
+### 2. Sensitive → delivery to terminal verdict
 
 When classification is **sensitive**:
 
 - Require delivery review via `risk-review-coverage` / `wp_review_gate`
   (purpose delivery) / qualifying lane approvals for the current
-  review subject until `policySatisfied`.
-- Launch **exactly one** `wp_review_gate` delivery attempt with
+  review subject until `policySatisfied` (**approval** or valid same-subject
+  **maintainer-override**). A formal **reject** is a terminal automated-review
+  outcome but does **not** satisfy land policy: Product status stays
+  `incomplete`, Process status stays `sensitive-blocked` until approval or
+  override. Tech-debt is **not** a substitute for delivery approval.
+- Launch **exactly one at a time** `wp_review_gate` delivery attempt with
   `--base-ref <base-sha>` and `--authority-ref <head-sha>`. Do not substitute
   `HEAD` for the authority SHA, and do not relaunch while the same subject has
   an in-progress gate.
+- On formal **reject**: surface the gate `next_action` (`report_delivery_reject`)
+  / reject projection to the user; free-triage against blueprint non-goals;
+  address the findings, then re-review only a changed exact subject. The shared
+  gate permits five distinct rejected delivery subjects by default. Once that
+  budget is exhausted, **do not** set `scope_continue=true` without explicit
+  user authorization; agents must not invent the grant. For plan or delivery,
+  only an operator may request an absolute finite same-slug ceiling through MCP
+  `scope_continue_limit` (10..32); the field still requires
+  `scope_continue=true`. MCP wins over `WP_REVIEW_SCOPE_CONTINUE_LIMIT`; when
+  neither is present, the plan/delivery defaults are 16/10. Machine enforcement
+  does not link successor slugs; creating one to launder or bypass the budget
+  remains procedurally forbidden, as do resets and retry schemes.
 - `Review-skip` is **FORBIDDEN** (`sensitive-review-skip-forbidden`).
 - Completed owner blueprint must be present in the PR
   (`sensitive-no-completed-owner` otherwise).
@@ -293,7 +309,7 @@ When classification is **standard**:
   Must be start-of-line. Process label: `standard-skip`.
 
 - Otherwise obtain **exactly one sequential** advisory outside voice
-  (`wp_review_run` or host skill). Process label: `outside-approved`.
+  (`wp_review_gate` with `mode: "advisory"`, or host skill). Process label: `outside-approved`.
 - At most **one OpenCode Go reviewer** counts unless the user asks for more.
 - Invoke the selected reviewer **once**. Do not probe, retry, or rotate
   providers automatically, and **never** fan out parallel multi-host review
@@ -330,9 +346,25 @@ Never invent a land-now skip. See `land-policy` for the full table.
   `not_found` means there is no active or terminal gate for that subject; refresh
   state and start the gate again instead of continuing to wait.
 - Implementation / delivery approval: for sensitive PRs use `wp_review_gate`
-  purpose delivery on the immutable subject; for standard advisory use
-  `wp_review_run` exactly once with the selected provider and an expected
-  verdict marker. Do not run a separate provider probe.
+  purpose delivery, default authoritative mode, on the immutable subject; for
+  standard advisory use the same `wp_review_gate` call with `mode: "advisory"`
+  exactly once with the selected provider. Do not run a separate provider
+  probe. A later authoritative call on the same subject may promote a
+  matching complete advisory approval to authority with zero provider
+  invocation, unless a completed reject already exists for that content at
+  either stage.
+- `advisory-exhausted` is a terminal outcome with no ledger event and no
+  verdict — treat it as terminal-without-authority. It means this exact
+  digest already used its advisory attempt budget; do not retry the same
+  content or report it as a failure. Change the reviewed content (which mints
+  a new digest) or spend real authoritative budget instead. It is always
+  returned synchronously; no `wp_review_gate_wait` poll is ever needed or
+  issued for it.
+- An advisory gate and an authoritative gate on the same subject cannot run
+  concurrently — unlike the removed `wp_review_run`, an advisory
+  `wp_review_gate` call claims the same active marker an authoritative call
+  does. If a call reports marker contention, serialize the two calls rather
+  than treating contention as an error.
 - Each gate reviewer must return exactly one schema-valid JSON review object;
   never infer a verdict from Markdown. The gate derives approval from typed
   findings: blockers reject, nits approve with nits, and no findings approve.
@@ -360,7 +392,9 @@ If any required check is missing, the correct result is **not done yet**, not a
 
 **Tooling friction (optional):** if this session burned medium+ tokens on MCP/CLI/hooks/CI
 gates (not product code), run `/tooling-friction` once and resolve its capture
-destination with `wp_tooling_friction_path({"file":"<file>"})` (human CLI:
-`wp tooling-friction path --file <file>`). Skip when the path was smooth. If
-the surface cannot be resolved or written, report the skip and never fall
-back to a worktree path. Never blocks land — see the `tooling-friction` skill.
+destination with `wp_tooling_friction_path({"file":"<file>"})` — copy the absolute
+path from the tool summary (human CLI: `wp tooling-friction path --file <file>`).
+Do not invent fleet folder slugs or worktree-keyed desktop-state paths. Skip when
+the path was smooth. If the surface cannot be resolved or written, report the skip
+and never fall back to a worktree path. Never blocks land — see the
+`tooling-friction` skill.