@warren-dean/code-kit 0.3.12 → 0.3.15

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
9
9
  "name": "code-kit",
10
10
  "source": "./",
11
11
  "description": "Keeps AI coding agents inside your project's rules, from idea to merged code: spec design, lanes, layer rules, protected paths with an approval log, spec-check and design gates, proof-before-finish checks, dispatch, review, build status and CI verification, configured per project from its docs",
12
- "version": "0.3.12",
12
+ "version": "0.3.15",
13
13
  "category": "development",
14
14
  "tags": ["guardrails", "architecture", "lanes", "layers", "spec-driven", "ci", "multi-agent"],
15
15
  "license": "MIT"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "code-kit",
3
- "version": "0.3.12",
3
+ "version": "0.3.15",
4
4
  "description": "Keeps AI coding agents inside your project's rules, from idea to merged code: spec design, lanes, layer rules, protected paths with an approval log, spec-check and design gates, proof-before-finish checks, dispatch, review, build status and CI verification, configured per project from its docs",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Warren Langeveldt"
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -2,6 +2,24 @@
2
2
 
3
3
  What changed in each release of code-kit, newest first. Versions follow the plugin manifest and the npm package `@warren-dean/code-kit`. Each release is also on [GitHub Releases](https://github.com/warrendeanlangeveldt/code-kit/releases).
4
4
 
5
+ ## 0.3.15 (2026-10-06)
6
+
7
+ - **`verify` accepts your Context Graph ratifications:** a change to `.ctx/graph.ctx` whose commits all carry your `Ctx-Ratified-By` trailer passes without an approval-log entry. That's what `ctx ratify --commit` and `ctx drop --commit` write from your terminal, where code-kit's hooks don't run to log it. Agents still can't write that trailer, and a delegated trailer still needs the log.
8
+
9
+ ## 0.3.14 (2026-10-06)
10
+
11
+ - **Context Graph's person acts:** with Context Graph in the project, the hooks refuse `ctx ratify … --commit` and `ctx drop` from every agent, matching Context Graph 0.2.11, which makes both the person's own acts. Only a real command counts; text that mentions one, such as an `echo` or documentation, isn't refused.
12
+
13
+ ## 0.3.13 (2026-10-06)
14
+
15
+ The command-line groundwork for the coming code-kit mod (`docs/brief.md`), useful on its own:
16
+
17
+ - **Approval requests:** every refusal that a person's approval would allow is now recorded as a request, once per actor and command. `code-kit requests [--json]` lists the open requests and the approvals in force, with minutes left. A request closes when its approvals are given.
18
+ - **`code-kit approve … --via pane`** marks an approval as given in the code-kit pane.
19
+ - **`code-kit merge <branch> --person`:** the person merges a branch after `verify` passes, with no delegation needed.
20
+ - **Agents:** the hooks refuse `--via` and `--person` from every agent.
21
+ - **`code-kit verify --json`** prints the branch, its lane and the problems by group.
22
+
5
23
  ## 0.3.12 (2026-10-05)
6
24
 
7
25
  - **Delegated merges:** with `"approvals": { "delegate": { "merge": true } }`, the lead can merge a reviewed branch into a protected branch with `code-kit merge <branch> --delegated`. This is for an autonomous lead.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -305,12 +305,13 @@ code-kit unowned # tracked files nobody may write
305
305
  code-kit diff --config .claude/code-kit.draft.json # what a draft changes
306
306
  code-kit baseline [--write] # layer violations in the code as it is
307
307
  code-kit graph [--depth N] # which folders import which
308
- code-kit verify [--base ref] [--branch name] [--no-checks] # a branch's changes, for CI and review
308
+ code-kit verify [--base ref] [--branch name] [--no-checks] [--json] # a branch's changes, for CI and review
309
309
  code-kit status [--base ref] [--json] # stories and requirements against the spec
310
310
  code-kit next [--base ref] [--json] # the step to take now, from the project's state
311
311
  code-kit trace <path>... [--json] # what a file is for: requirements, lane, layer rules
312
- code-kit merge <branch> --delegated [--into branch] # the lead merges a branch that passes verify, where approvals.delegate.merge is on
313
- code-kit approve <name>... --reason "…" [--lane name] [--delegated] # record a person's approval from chat, or (--delegated) grant one within the delegated rules; a package name stands for its dep- approval
312
+ code-kit merge <branch> --delegated|--person [--into branch] # merge a branch that passes verify: the lead where approvals.delegate.merge is on, or the person
313
+ code-kit requests [--json] # approval requests the hooks refused, still open, and the approvals in force
314
+ code-kit approve <name>... --reason "…" [--lane name] [--delegated | --via pane] # record a person's approval from chat, or (--delegated) grant one within the delegated rules; a package name stands for its dep- approval
314
315
  ```
315
316
 
316
317
  `verify` compares the branch with where it left `--base` (default `origin/main`, then `main`). A branch named `<lane>/…`, or given as `--branch`, is held to that lane. `--no-checks` leaves the project's checks to CI's own steps. `status` reads `docs.specs` and `docs.plan`.
@@ -372,6 +373,12 @@ code-kit approve dep-dayjs --lane web --reason "Yes, add dayjs for ST-12"
372
373
  - The lead may also run `shell.block` commands marked `person: true`, such as Context Graph's ratification trailer.
373
374
  - It trusts the lead to act only on the person's own words. Leave it off when the lead runs without a person watching.
374
375
 
376
+ ### Requests
377
+
378
+ Every refusal that a person's approval would allow is recorded as a request in `.claude/state/requests.jsonl` in the main checkout: who was refused, the approvals that would allow it, the command or file, and why. A request stays open until approvals for all its names are in force, or for 60 minutes. `code-kit requests` lists the open ones and the approvals in force, with minutes left, and the code-kit mod shows them above the prompt.
379
+
380
+ `--via pane` and `merge --person` are the person's own acts, which the code-kit mod uses for a press in its pane. The hooks refuse both from every agent.
381
+
375
382
  ### Delegated
376
383
 
377
384
  For a lead that runs without a person watching, such as an autonomous team, `approvals.delegate` lets the lead approve some things on its own authority, within rules the person sets in the config:
@@ -404,9 +411,9 @@ Other tools share a project with code-kit and keep files of their own. An adapte
404
411
 
405
412
  While the tool is detected, its additions are merged into the effective config, like the kit's own defaults. Run `code-kit adapters` to see them, or switch one off with `"adapters": { "<name>": false }`.
406
413
 
407
- | Adapter | Detected by | Adds |
408
- | --------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
409
- | `context-graph` | `.ctx/` | `.ctx/**` for the lead. `.ctx/decisions.ctx` and `.ctx/cards.ctx` for any actor, since every agent records decisions and file cards. `graph.ctx` and `config.toml` are protected (approval `ctx`). No Claude actor may write a person's `Ctx-Ratified-By` trailer: ratifying is a person's act (with `approvals.lead`, the lead may add it when the person says so in chat). A delegated trailer, `Ctx-Ratified-By: <ratifier> (delegated)`, is the lead's alone, under Context Graph's `[delegate]` rules. |
414
+ | Adapter | Detected by | Adds |
415
+ | --------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
416
+ | `context-graph` | `.ctx/` | `.ctx/**` for the lead. `.ctx/decisions.ctx` and `.ctx/cards.ctx` for any actor, since every agent records decisions and file cards. `graph.ctx` and `config.toml` are protected (approval `ctx`). No Claude actor may write a person's `Ctx-Ratified-By` trailer: ratifying is a person's act (with `approvals.lead`, the lead may add it when the person says so in chat). A delegated trailer, `Ctx-Ratified-By: <ratifier> (delegated)`, is the lead's alone, under Context Graph's `[delegate]` rules. `verify` accepts a `graph.ctx` change whose commits carry a person's trailer (`ctx ratify --commit`, `ctx drop --commit`) without an approval-log entry. Agents can't run those commands. |
410
417
 
411
418
  Its setup:
412
419
 
package/bin/code-kit.mjs CHANGED
@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@
15
15
  // next [--base ref] [--json]
16
16
  // the step to take now (spec-design, init, dispatch, review…), from the project's state
17
17
  // approve <name>... --reason "…" [--lane name]
18
- // merge <branch> --delegated [--into branch] the lead merges a branch that passes verify (approvals.delegate.merge)
18
+ // merge <branch> --delegated|--person [--into branch] merge a branch that passes verify: the lead
19
+ // (approvals.delegate.merge) or the person (the code-kit pane)
20
+ // requests [--json] open approval requests and approvals in force
19
21
  // record approvals a person gave in chat (with approvals.lead on, the lead runs it)
20
22
  // --config <file> reads a draft (.claude/code-kit.draft.json) instead of .claude/code-kit.json.
21
23
  import { execFileSync } from 'node:child_process';
@@ -34,8 +36,11 @@ import { buildStatus } from '../hooks/lib/plan.mjs';
34
36
  import {
35
37
  APPROVAL_MINUTES,
36
38
  currentBranch,
39
+ PANE,
40
+ approvalsInForce,
37
41
  delegatedMark,
38
42
  grantApprovals,
43
+ openRequests,
39
44
  ownerOf,
40
45
  } from '../hooks/lib/rules.mjs';
41
46
  import { DEPENDENCY_APPROVAL, dependencyApproval } from '../hooks/lib/dependencies.mjs';
@@ -65,7 +70,8 @@ const branchName = option('--branch');
65
70
  const reason = option('--reason');
66
71
  const laneName = option('--lane');
67
72
  const intoName = option('--into');
68
- const FLAGS = ['--write', '--no-checks', '--json', '--delegated'];
73
+ const via = option('--via');
74
+ const FLAGS = ['--write', '--no-checks', '--json', '--delegated', '--person'];
69
75
  const flag = (name) => args.includes(name);
70
76
  const writeBaseline = flag('--write');
71
77
  const [command, ...rest] = args.filter((a) => !FLAGS.includes(a));
@@ -253,13 +259,18 @@ const VERIFY_GROUPS = {
253
259
 
254
260
  // The lead merges a reviewed branch into a protected branch on its own, only where the config delegates
255
261
  // merges, and only when `verify` passes on that branch, checks included. A person merges with git.
262
+ // With --person, the person merges (the mod passes it for a press in its pane): the same verify first,
263
+ // with no delegation needed. The hooks refuse --person from every agent.
256
264
  function merge(branch) {
257
265
  const { config } = load();
258
- if (!flag('--delegated'))
266
+ const byPerson = flag('--person');
267
+ if (!flag('--delegated') && !byPerson)
259
268
  die(
260
- "code-kit merge is the lead's delegated merge: code-kit merge <branch> --delegated. A person merges with git as usual.",
269
+ 'code-kit merge needs --delegated (the lead, within the delegated rules) or --person (the person, as from the code-kit pane).',
261
270
  );
262
- if (!config.approvals.delegate?.merge)
271
+ if (flag('--delegated') && byPerson)
272
+ die("A merge is either the lead's (--delegated) or the person's (--person), not both.");
273
+ if (!byPerson && !config.approvals.delegate?.merge)
263
274
  die(
264
275
  'This project doesn\'t delegate merges to the lead ("approvals.delegate.merge" isn\'t true). A person merges after review.',
265
276
  );
@@ -336,7 +347,7 @@ function merge(branch) {
336
347
  '-m',
337
348
  `Merge ${branch} into ${into}`,
338
349
  '-m',
339
- `Verified with code-kit verify (${changed.length} file(s)${lane ? `, held to the ${lane} lane` : ''}) and merged by the lead within the delegated rules.`,
350
+ `Verified with code-kit verify (${changed.length} file(s)${lane ? `, held to the ${lane} lane` : ''}) and merged ${byPerson ? 'by the person' : 'by the lead within the delegated rules'}.`,
340
351
  branch,
341
352
  );
342
353
  } catch (e) {
@@ -357,6 +368,24 @@ function merge(branch) {
357
368
  }
358
369
  }
359
370
 
371
+ // Open approval requests and the approvals in force, for the person and the mod's band.
372
+ function requests() {
373
+ load();
374
+ const open = openRequests(resolve('.'));
375
+ const granted = approvalsInForce(resolve('.'));
376
+ if (flag('--json')) return out(JSON.stringify({ open, inForce: granted }, null, 2));
377
+ out(open.length ? `${open.length} approval request(s) open:` : 'No approval requests open.');
378
+ for (const r of open)
379
+ out(
380
+ ` ${r.names.join(', ')} for ${r.lane ? `the ${r.lane} lane` : r.actor}: ${r.what} (${r.why})`,
381
+ );
382
+ out(granted.length ? `\n${granted.length} approval(s) in force:` : '\nNo approvals in force.');
383
+ for (const a of granted)
384
+ out(
385
+ ` ${a.name} for ${a.lane ? `the ${a.lane} lane` : 'any agent'}, ${a.minutesLeft} min left: ${a.reason}`,
386
+ );
387
+ }
388
+
360
389
  function verify() {
361
390
  const { config } = load();
362
391
  const from = base(config, true);
@@ -376,6 +405,18 @@ function verify() {
376
405
  lane,
377
406
  checks: !flag('--no-checks'),
378
407
  });
408
+ if (flag('--json')) {
409
+ const count = Object.values(found).reduce((n, list) => n + list.length, 0);
410
+ out(
411
+ JSON.stringify(
412
+ { base: from, branch, lane, changed: changed.length, found, problems: count },
413
+ null,
414
+ 2,
415
+ ),
416
+ );
417
+ if (count) process.exit(1);
418
+ return;
419
+ }
379
420
  out(
380
421
  `${changed.length} file(s) changed since ${from}${lane ? `, held to the ${lane} lane (branch ${branch})` : ''}.`,
381
422
  );
@@ -529,6 +570,11 @@ async function approve(given) {
529
570
  `Not an approval or package name: ${bad.join(', ')}. Use the name the refusal gave, e.g. kit or dep-zod, or the package's name.`,
530
571
  );
531
572
  const marks = {};
573
+ if (via !== undefined && via !== 'pane')
574
+ die('--via takes only "pane": the code-kit mod passes it for a press in its pane.');
575
+ if (via === 'pane' && delegated)
576
+ die("An approval is either the person's (--via pane) or the lead's (--delegated), not both.");
577
+ if (via === 'pane') for (const n of names) marks[n] = PANE;
532
578
  if (delegated) {
533
579
  const rules = config.approvals.delegate;
534
580
  if (!rules)
@@ -569,6 +615,7 @@ const commands = {
569
615
  check,
570
616
  approve: () => (rest.length ? approve(rest) : usage()),
571
617
  merge: () => (rest.length === 1 ? merge(rest[0]) : usage()),
618
+ requests,
572
619
  trace: () => (rest.length ? trace(rest) : usage()),
573
620
  adapters,
574
621
  next,
@@ -586,7 +633,7 @@ function usage() {
586
633
  ' | verify [--base ref] [--branch name] [--no-checks] | status [--base ref] [--json]\n' +
587
634
  ' | next [--base ref] [--json] | adapters | trace <path>... [--json]\n' +
588
635
  ' | approve <name>... --reason "…" [--lane name] [--config file]',
589
- ' | merge <branch> --delegated [--into branch]',
636
+ ' | merge <branch> --delegated|--person [--into branch] | requests [--json]',
590
637
  );
591
638
  }
592
639
  await (commands[command] ?? usage)();
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import {
20
20
  dependencyGrants,
21
21
  owns,
22
22
  protectedEntry,
23
+ recordRequest,
23
24
  sessionRoot,
24
25
  } from './lib/rules.mjs';
25
26
 
@@ -101,6 +102,11 @@ if (approves && actor.kind !== 'lead')
101
102
  block(
102
103
  `Blocked: only the lead records or grants approvals. Write a short change request for the lead (what needs approving, and why), and stop.\nCommand: ${cmd}`,
103
104
  );
105
+ // The pane's acts are the person's: no agent passes --person or --via, whatever its other permissions.
106
+ if ((delegatedMerge && /\s--person\b/.test(cmd)) || (approves && /\s--via\b/.test(cmd)))
107
+ block(
108
+ `Blocked: merging or approving as the person is the person's own act, from the code-kit pane or their terminal. Ask them, and stop.\nCommand: ${cmd}`,
109
+ );
104
110
  if (delegatedMerge && actor.kind !== 'lead')
105
111
  block(
106
112
  `Blocked: only the lead merges into a protected branch. Finish your story and commit it on your branch; the lead reviews and merges it.\nCommand: ${cmd}`,
@@ -130,6 +136,13 @@ if (packages.length) {
130
136
  (p) => !approval(sessionIn ?? project, dependencyApproval(p), actor),
131
137
  );
132
138
  if (unapproved.length) {
139
+ recordRequest(
140
+ sessionIn ?? project,
141
+ actor,
142
+ unapproved.map(dependencyApproval),
143
+ cmd,
144
+ "A new dependency needs a person's approval.",
145
+ );
133
146
  const ask =
134
147
  actor.kind === 'lead'
135
148
  ? 'Ask the person to approve it by running'
@@ -185,6 +198,13 @@ const writes =
185
198
  cmd,
186
199
  );
187
200
  if (touchesKit && writes && actor.kind !== 'lead' && !approval(root, 'kit', actor)) {
201
+ recordRequest(
202
+ root,
203
+ actor,
204
+ 'kit',
205
+ cmd,
206
+ "The .claude kit is changed only by the lead or with a person's approval.",
207
+ );
188
208
  block(
189
209
  `Blocked: the .claude kit is changed only by the lead or with a person's approval. Ask the lead to run\n${approvalHowTo('kit', actor, root, undefined, config)}`,
190
210
  );
@@ -237,6 +257,7 @@ function recordApprovals() {
237
257
  const granted = entry && approval(root, entry.approval, actor);
238
258
  const byDependency = actor.kind === 'lane' && dependencyChange(actor, file, root, config);
239
259
  if (entry && !granted && actor.kind !== 'lead' && !byDependency) {
260
+ recordRequest(root, actor, entry.approval, file, entry.why);
240
261
  block(
241
262
  `Blocked: ${file} is ${entry.why}; committing it needs a person's approval in force. Ask the lead to run\n${approvalHowTo(entry.approval, actor, root, undefined, config)}`,
242
263
  );
@@ -7,9 +7,14 @@
7
7
  // lead act on what the person says in chat (`approvals.lead`). A delegated ratification, signed
8
8
  // `Ctx-Ratified-By: <ratifier> (delegated)`, is the lead's own act under the repository's [delegate]
9
9
  // rules: only the lead may write that trailer, and Context Graph's gate checks the kinds it covers.
10
+ // Ratifying with `--commit`, and dropping a proposal, are the person's acts in ctx too, so no actor runs
11
+ // them; only a command in command position counts, so text that mentions one isn't refused.
10
12
  import { existsSync } from 'node:fs';
11
13
  import { join } from 'node:path';
12
14
 
15
+ const CTX = String.raw`(?:ctx|node\s+["']?[^\s"']*ctx\.mjs["']?|npx\s+(?:--yes\s+)?@warren-dean/context-graph(?:@\S+)?)`;
16
+ const PERSONS_ACT = String.raw`(?:^|[;&|\n])\s*${CTX}\s+(?:ratify\b[^;&|\n]*\s--commit\b|drop\b)`;
17
+
13
18
  export default {
14
19
  name: 'context-graph',
15
20
  detect: (root) => existsSync(join(root, '.ctx')),
@@ -17,7 +22,13 @@ export default {
17
22
  lead: ['.ctx/**'],
18
23
  anyActor: ['.ctx/decisions.ctx', '.ctx/cards.ctx'],
19
24
  protected: [
20
- { glob: '.ctx/graph.ctx', approval: 'ctx', why: "Context Graph's rules and concepts" },
25
+ {
26
+ glob: '.ctx/graph.ctx',
27
+ approval: 'ctx',
28
+ why: "Context Graph's rules and concepts",
29
+ // A person's ratification (`ctx ratify --commit`, `ctx drop --commit`) is signed, not logged.
30
+ signedBy: '^Ctx-Ratified-By:(?![^\\n]*\\(delegated\\))\\s*\\S',
31
+ },
21
32
  { glob: '.ctx/config.toml', approval: 'ctx', why: "Context Graph's settings" },
22
33
  ],
23
34
  },
@@ -28,6 +39,10 @@ export default {
28
39
  why: "Ratifying a Context Graph rule is a person's act: they add the Ctx-Ratified-By trailer themselves, with a `!` git command.",
29
40
  person: true,
30
41
  },
42
+ {
43
+ pattern: PERSONS_ACT,
44
+ why: "Ratifying a Context Graph proposal with --commit, and dropping one, are the person's own acts: they run them themselves, with a `!` command, or from the Context Graph pane.",
45
+ },
31
46
  ],
32
47
  restricted: [
33
48
  {
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
3
3
  //
4
4
  // name the tool, and the key that switches it off in the config: "adapters": { "<name>": false }
5
5
  // detect (root) => true when the tool is in use in this project
6
- // config { lead?, anyActor?, protected? } merged into the effective config, like the kit's defaults
6
+ // config { lead?, anyActor?, protected? } merged into the effective config, like the kit's defaults.
7
+ // A protected entry may name `signedBy`, a pattern for a commit-message line that only a
8
+ // person may write (the hooks block it for every actor); verify accepts a change whose
9
+ // commits all carry it in place of an approval-log entry
7
10
  // shell { block?, restricted? } block: commands refused for every Claude actor, merged into
8
11
  // shell.block (`person: true` marks a person's act the lead may do for them under
9
12
  // approvals.lead); restricted: commands only the lead and the listed lanes may run
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
14
14
  // sets `approvals.lead` (a person on a phone has no `!`), by saying so in chat for the lead to record
15
15
  // with `code-kit approve`.
16
16
  import {
17
+ appendFileSync,
17
18
  existsSync,
18
19
  mkdirSync,
19
20
  readFileSync,
@@ -38,6 +39,10 @@ const NEVER_WRITABLE = [`${APPROVALS_DIR}/**`, APPROVAL_LOG];
38
39
  export const CLI = fileURLToPath(new URL('../../bin/code-kit.mjs', import.meta.url));
39
40
  // Marks an approval the lead recorded from chat, so the log shows how it was given.
40
41
  export const RELAYED = '(given in chat, recorded by the lead)';
42
+ /** Marks an approval the person gave with a button in the code-kit pane (the mod). */
43
+ export const PANE = '(approved in the code-kit pane)';
44
+ /** Refusals a person's approval would allow, for the mod's band and `code-kit requests`. */
45
+ export const REQUESTS_FILE = '.claude/state/requests.jsonl';
41
46
 
42
47
  /** The command the lead runs to record approvals a person gave in chat. */
43
48
  /** Marks an approval the lead granted on its own, within `approvals.delegate`; `rule` names the rule. */
@@ -218,6 +223,102 @@ export function approval(root, name, actor) {
218
223
  return lane ?? inForce(join(dir, name));
219
224
  }
220
225
 
226
+ const requestsFile = (root) => join(projectWorktrees(root)[0] ?? root, REQUESTS_FILE);
227
+ const sameRequest = (a, b) =>
228
+ a.actor === b.actor &&
229
+ a.what === b.what &&
230
+ [...a.names].sort().join() === [...b.names].sort().join();
231
+
232
+ /** Every request recorded, oldest first; unreadable lines are skipped. */
233
+ export function readRequests(root) {
234
+ try {
235
+ return readFileSync(requestsFile(root), 'utf8')
236
+ .split('\n')
237
+ .filter(Boolean)
238
+ .flatMap((l) => {
239
+ try {
240
+ return [JSON.parse(l)];
241
+ } catch {
242
+ return [];
243
+ }
244
+ });
245
+ } catch {
246
+ return [];
247
+ }
248
+ }
249
+
250
+ /**
251
+ * Records that `actor` was refused something the approvals `names` would allow, once: the same
252
+ * actor, names and command or file within the approval lifetime count as one request. Recording
253
+ * never changes the refusal, so any failure here is ignored.
254
+ */
255
+ export function recordRequest(root, actor, names, what, why, now = Date.now()) {
256
+ try {
257
+ const request = {
258
+ at: new Date(now).toISOString(),
259
+ actor: actor?.label ?? 'unknown',
260
+ ...(actor?.kind === 'lane' ? { lane: actor.lane } : {}),
261
+ names: [names].flat(),
262
+ what: String(what).slice(0, 200),
263
+ why: String(why).slice(0, 300),
264
+ };
265
+ const fresh = readRequests(root).filter(
266
+ (r) => now - Date.parse(r.at) < APPROVAL_MINUTES * 60_000,
267
+ );
268
+ if (fresh.some((r) => sameRequest(r, request))) return;
269
+ const file = requestsFile(root);
270
+ mkdirSync(dirname(file), { recursive: true });
271
+ appendFileSync(file, `${JSON.stringify(request)}\n`);
272
+ } catch {
273
+ // the refusal stands either way
274
+ }
275
+ }
276
+
277
+ /** Requests from the last 60 minutes that an approval in force doesn't yet answer, newest first. */
278
+ export function openRequests(root, now = Date.now()) {
279
+ const open = [];
280
+ for (const r of readRequests(root).reverse()) {
281
+ if (now - Date.parse(r.at) >= APPROVAL_MINUTES * 60_000) continue;
282
+ if (open.some((o) => sameRequest(o, r))) continue;
283
+ const actor = r.lane ? { kind: 'lane', lane: r.lane } : { kind: 'lead' };
284
+ if (r.names.every((n) => approval(root, n, actor))) continue;
285
+ open.push(r);
286
+ }
287
+ return open;
288
+ }
289
+
290
+ /** Approvals in force now: [{ name, lane?, reason, grantedAt, minutesLeft }]. */
291
+ export function approvalsInForce(root, now = Date.now()) {
292
+ const dir = approvalsDir(root);
293
+ const found = [];
294
+ const look = (folder, lane) => {
295
+ let names = [];
296
+ try {
297
+ names = readdirSync(folder);
298
+ } catch {
299
+ return;
300
+ }
301
+ for (const name of names) {
302
+ const file = join(folder, name);
303
+ if (statSync(file).isDirectory()) {
304
+ if (!lane) look(file, name);
305
+ continue;
306
+ }
307
+ const a = inForce(file);
308
+ if (!a) continue;
309
+ const left = APPROVAL_MINUTES - (now - Date.parse(a.grantedAt)) / 60_000;
310
+ found.push({
311
+ name,
312
+ ...(lane ? { lane } : {}),
313
+ ...a,
314
+ minutesLeft: Math.max(0, Math.floor(left)),
315
+ });
316
+ }
317
+ };
318
+ look(dir);
319
+ return found;
320
+ }
321
+
221
322
  /** The dependency approvals in force for `actor`: [{ name, reason, grantedAt }]. */
222
323
  export function dependencyGrants(root, actor) {
223
324
  if (actor?.kind === 'readonly') return [];
@@ -277,6 +378,7 @@ export function writeProblem(actor, rel, root, config) {
277
378
  // The lead writes protected files without an approval: the person reviews them in the pull request,
278
379
  // and every committed change is in the audit log. Anyone else needs a person's approval as well.
279
380
  if (guarded && actor.kind !== 'lead' && !approval(root, guarded.approval, actor)) {
381
+ recordRequest(root, actor, guarded.approval, rel, guarded.why);
280
382
  return `${rel} is ${guarded.why} and needs a person's approval. Ask the lead (a person) to run\n${approvalHowTo(guarded.approval, actor, root, undefined, config)}`;
281
383
  }
282
384
  if (actor.kind === 'readonly') return `${actor.label} is read-only; it may not write ${rel}.`;
@@ -80,6 +80,22 @@ function logEntries(root, base) {
80
80
  return { entries, problems };
81
81
  }
82
82
 
83
+ /**
84
+ * Whether every commit since `from` that changed `file` carries the trailer a protected entry names as
85
+ * a person's signature (`signedBy`, a pattern for one line of the message). A person's own commit from
86
+ * their terminal never passes through the hooks, so for such files the signature stands in for the log.
87
+ */
88
+ function signedByPerson(root, from, file, signedBy) {
89
+ if (!signedBy) return false;
90
+ const out = git(root, 'log', '--format=%B%x1e', `${from}..HEAD`, '--', file);
91
+ const messages = out
92
+ .split('\x1e')
93
+ .map((m) => m.trim())
94
+ .filter(Boolean);
95
+ const line = new RegExp(signedBy, 'm');
96
+ return messages.length > 0 && messages.every((m) => line.test(m));
97
+ }
98
+
83
99
  /**
84
100
  * Every problem with the branch, grouped: { ownership, protected, layers, baseline, design, checks }.
85
101
  * `lane` holds the branch to that lane's paths; `checks: false` leaves the project's checks to CI's
@@ -100,7 +116,8 @@ export function verifyBranch({ root, base, config, lane = null, checks = true })
100
116
  found.ownership.push(`${f} may hold secrets; secrets never go in the repository.`);
101
117
  if (f === APPROVAL_LOG) continue;
102
118
  const guarded = protectedEntry(f, config);
103
- if (guarded && !logged.has(f))
119
+ const signed = guarded && !logged.has(f) && signedByPerson(root, from, f, guarded.signedBy);
120
+ if (guarded && !logged.has(f) && !signed)
104
121
  found.protected.push(
105
122
  `${f} is ${guarded.why}, but no approval-log entry records this change. Protected files are committed through Claude Code with code-kit, which logs them.`,
106
123
  );
@@ -114,7 +131,7 @@ export function verifyBranch({ root, base, config, lane = null, checks = true })
114
131
  isDependencyFile(f) &&
115
132
  entry?.approval === 'dependency' &&
116
133
  [null, lane].includes(laneOf(f, config));
117
- const approved = (guarded && entry?.approval === guarded.approval) || dependency;
134
+ const approved = (guarded && entry?.approval === guarded.approval) || signed || dependency;
118
135
  if (!own && !approved)
119
136
  found.ownership.push(
120
137
  `${f}: the ${lane} lane doesn't own it (owner: ${ownerOf(f, config) ?? 'nobody'}).`,
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@warren-dean/code-kit",
3
- "version": "0.3.12",
3
+ "version": "0.3.15",
4
4
  "description": "Keeps AI coding agents inside your project's rules: lanes, layer rules, protected paths and proof before finish, enforced by Claude Code hooks and in CI",
5
5
  "license": "MIT",
6
6
  "author": "Warren Langeveldt",