@warmdrift/kgauto-compiler 2.0.0-alpha.81 → 2.0.0-alpha.83

package/dist/index.js

@@ -23,9 +23,12 @@ __export(index_exports, {
   ABSOLUTE_FLOOR: () => ABSOLUTE_FLOOR,
   ALIASES: () => ALIASES,
   ALL_ARCHETYPES: () => ALL_ARCHETYPES,
+  ALT_BLIND_TOKEN_BUDGET_BREACH: () => ALT_BLIND_TOKEN_BUDGET_BREACH,
+  ALT_STRATEGY_IDS: () => ALT_STRATEGY_IDS,
   ARCHETYPE_FAMILY_FITS: () => ARCHETYPE_FAMILY_FITS,
   ARCHETYPE_FLOOR_DEFAULT: () => ARCHETYPE_FLOOR_DEFAULT,
   BRAIN_READ_ENV_NAMES: () => BRAIN_READ_ENV_NAMES,
+  BURST_SPAN_MS: () => BURST_SPAN_MS,
   COACH_CFG: () => COACH_CFG,
   COST_RANKING_REFERENCE_SHAPE: () => COST_RANKING_REFERENCE_SHAPE,
   CallError: () => CallError,
@@ -36,6 +39,7 @@ __export(index_exports, {
   DEFAULT_PROMOTIONS_ENDPOINT: () => DEFAULT_PROMOTIONS_ENDPOINT,
   DELEGATE_TOOL_DEFINITION: () => DELEGATE_TOOL_DEFINITION,
   DIALECT_VERSION: () => DIALECT_VERSION,
+  DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_ALT_BLIND_HEADER: () => DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_ALT_BLIND_HEADER,
   DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_ALT_HEADER: () => DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_ALT_HEADER,
   FamilyResolutionError: () => FamilyResolutionError,
   INTENT_ARCHETYPES: () => INTENT_ARCHETYPES,
@@ -52,6 +56,7 @@ __export(index_exports, {
   RULE_DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1: () => RULE_DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1,
   RULE_DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_STRUCTURED: () => RULE_DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_STRUCTURED,
   RULE_SEQUENTIAL_TOOL_CLIFF: () => RULE_SEQUENTIAL_TOOL_CLIFF,
+  STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_INDEPENDENT: () => STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_INDEPENDENT,
   STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_LIMITATION: () => STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_LIMITATION,
   TRANSLATOR_FLOOR: () => TRANSLATOR_FLOOR,
   _testResetMeasuredFailure: () => _testResetMeasuredFailure,
@@ -59,6 +64,7 @@ __export(index_exports, {
   _testWaitForMeasuredFailureRefresh: () => _testWaitForMeasuredFailureRefresh,
   _testWaitForPromotionsRefresh: () => _testWaitForPromotionsRefresh,
   allProfiles: () => allProfiles,
+  altBlindGatesBlockFor: () => altBlindGatesBlockFor,
   altGatesBlockFor: () => altGatesBlockFor,
   applyArchetypeConvention: () => applyArchetypeConvention,
   applySectionRewrites: () => applySectionRewrites,
@@ -72,9 +78,11 @@ __export(index_exports, {
   buildLLMJudge: () => buildLLMJudge,
   buildPairwiseJudgePrompt: () => buildPairwiseJudgePrompt,
   buildShadowProbeRow: () => buildShadowProbeRow,
+  burstCaveat: () => burstCaveat,
   call: () => call,
   captureGoldenIr: () => captureGoldenIr,
   chainProviderSpread: () => chainProviderSpread,
+  classifyEvidenceWindow: () => classifyEvidenceWindow,
   classifyStrategyOutcome: () => classifyStrategyOutcome,
   clearBrain: () => clearBrain,
   combineOrderSwappedVerdicts: () => combineOrderSwappedVerdicts,
@@ -94,6 +102,7 @@ __export(index_exports, {
   execute: () => execute,
   findBetterFit: () => findBetterFit,
   flushBrainDeadLetter: () => flushBrainDeadLetter,
+  formatEvidenceSpan: () => formatEvidenceSpan,
   getActionableAdvisories: () => getActionableAdvisories,
   getAllStarterChains: () => getAllStarterChains,
   getAllStarterChainsWithGrounding: () => getAllStarterChainsWithGrounding,
@@ -115,6 +124,7 @@ __export(index_exports, {
   getStarterChainWithGrounding: () => getStarterChainWithGrounding,
   hasMutation: () => hasMutation,
   hashShape: () => hashShape,
+  isAltStrategy: () => isAltStrategy,
   isArchetype: () => isArchetype,
   isAutoPromoteEnabledFromEnv: () => isAutoPromoteEnabledFromEnv,
   isBrainQueryActiveFor: () => isBrainQueryActiveFor,
@@ -160,6 +170,7 @@ __export(index_exports, {
   resolveGoldenCaptureRate: () => resolveGoldenCaptureRate,
   resolvePricingAt: () => resolvePricingAt,
   resolveProviderKey: () => resolveProviderKey,
+  rowToAdvisory: () => rowToAdvisory,
   rubricFor: () => rubricFor,
   runAdvisor: () => runAdvisor,
   runGoldenEval: () => runGoldenEval,
@@ -168,6 +179,7 @@ __export(index_exports, {
   shouldCaptureGolden: () => shouldCaptureGolden,
   tryGetProfile: () => tryGetProfile,
   wilsonLowerBound: () => wilsonLowerBound,
+  withAltBlindDisciplineContract: () => withAltBlindDisciplineContract,
   withAltDisciplineContract: () => withAltDisciplineContract,
   withDisciplineContract: () => withDisciplineContract
 });
@@ -5186,6 +5198,20 @@ function detectSingleModelArray(ir, policy) {
     }
   ];
 }
+function suppressedRecommendationReason(ir, archetype, altProfile) {
+  if (getMeasuredFailureVerdict({ appId: ir.appId, archetype, model: altProfile.id })?.gated === true) {
+    return "measured-failure-gate";
+  }
+  if (ir.constraints?.structuredOutput && effectiveConventions(altProfile).some(
+    (c) => c.archetype === archetype && c.structuredOutputHint === "avoid"
+  )) {
+    return "schema-weakness-convention";
+  }
+  if (getRecentRollback({ appId: ir.appId, archetype, model: altProfile.id }) !== void 0) {
+    return "recent-rollback";
+  }
+  return void 0;
+}
 function openPostureRemedyClause(archetype, recommended, resolveProfile) {
   const openChain = getDefaultFallbackChain({ archetype, posture: "open" });
   const openPrimaryId = openChain[0];
@@ -5223,25 +5249,7 @@ function detectCostMismatchedArchetype(ir, profile, phase2) {
     if (altScore.score < QUALITY_FLOOR_FOR_RECOMMENDATION) continue;
     if (altScore.score < chosenScore.score) continue;
     if (altProfile.costInputPer1m >= profile.costInputPer1m) continue;
-    if (getMeasuredFailureVerdict({
-      appId: ir.appId,
-      archetype,
-      model: altProfile.id
-    })?.gated === true) {
-      continue;
-    }
-    if (ir.constraints?.structuredOutput && effectiveConventions(altProfile).some(
-      (c) => c.archetype === archetype && c.structuredOutputHint === "avoid"
-    )) {
-      continue;
-    }
-    if (getRecentRollback({
-      appId: ir.appId,
-      archetype,
-      model: altProfile.id
-    }) !== void 0) {
-      continue;
-    }
+    if (suppressedRecommendationReason(ir, archetype, altProfile)) continue;
     if (!bestAlt || altScore.score > bestAlt.score.score || altScore.score === bestAlt.score.score && altProfile.costInputPer1m < bestAlt.profile.costInputPer1m) {
       bestAlt = { id: altId, profile: altProfile, score: altScore };
     }
@@ -5299,6 +5307,7 @@ function detectTierDown(ir, profile, phase2) {
     if (altScore.score < QUALITY_FLOOR_FOR_RECOMMENDATION) continue;
     if (altScore.score < chosenScore.score) continue;
     if (altProfile.costInputPer1m > chosenCost * TIER_DOWN_COST_RATIO) continue;
+    if (suppressedRecommendationReason(ir, archetype, altProfile)) continue;
     if (!bestAlt || altProfile.costInputPer1m < bestAlt.profile.costInputPer1m || altProfile.costInputPer1m === bestAlt.profile.costInputPer1m && altScore.score > bestAlt.score.score) {
       bestAlt = { id: altId, profile: altProfile, score: altScore };
     }
@@ -5345,7 +5354,18 @@ function detectArchetypePerfFloorBreach(ir, profile) {
       // library pick" endorsement could land on a materially pricier
       // primary. The floor recommendation stands; the axis is now named,
       // and the cost-ordered variant is offered alongside it.
-      suggestion: `Swap to a model whose archetypePerf for ${ir.intent.archetype} clears the floor. Use \`getModelCompatibility(candidateId, { archetype: '${ir.intent.archetype}' })\` to vet candidates, or \`getDefaultFallbackChain({ archetype: '${ir.intent.archetype}', posture: 'open' })\` for a library-picked chain that respects the floor by construction \u2014 note that chain is ordered by archetype performance, NOT cost, so it may select a pricier primary than you run today. Add \`optimizeFor: 'cost'\` for a chain that clears the same floor cheapest-first.`,
+      //
+      // alpha.82 (cc-Cairn 2026-07-29, follow-on 1): the suggestion read as
+      // advice about the ARCHETYPE when it is a fact about ONE CALL. Model
+      // selection is input-size dependent, so a rule that fires on the
+      // small-payload tail of a path whose typical case clears the floor
+      // reads as "your primary is wrong" when the accurate statement is
+      // "this call landed here." Ground truth for the wording: tt-intel's
+      // open critical is `gemini-2.5-flash-lite` (ask, 5/10) selected at
+      // ~2.1K tokens_in, while `claude-opus-5` served the same archetype at
+      // ~22K the same day — cc read the evidence set as self-contradictory
+      // precisely because the text did not say which call it described.
+      suggestion: `This fired for \`${profile.id}\`, the model selected for THIS call \u2014 selection is input-size dependent, so other calls on \`${ir.intent.archetype}\` may pick a different model that clears the floor. Swap to a model whose archetypePerf for ${ir.intent.archetype} clears the floor. Use \`getModelCompatibility(candidateId, { archetype: '${ir.intent.archetype}' })\` to vet candidates, or \`getDefaultFallbackChain({ archetype: '${ir.intent.archetype}', posture: 'open' })\` for a library-picked chain that respects the floor by construction \u2014 note that chain is ordered by archetype performance, NOT cost, so it may select a pricier primary than you run today. Add \`optimizeFor: 'cost'\` for a chain that clears the same floor cheapest-first. To stop this model being selected at all, pass \`policy.blockedModels: ['${profile.id}']\`.`,
       recommendationType: "model-swap",
       docsUrl: "https://github.com/stue/command-center/blob/main/interfaces/kgauto.md#best-practice-advisories"
     }
@@ -5845,7 +5865,7 @@ function validateFinalFit(ir, profile, tokens) {
 }
 
 // src/version.ts
-var LIBRARY_VERSION = "2.0.0-alpha.81";
+var LIBRARY_VERSION = "2.0.0-alpha.83";
 
 // src/pricing-brain.ts
 function isPricingRow(x) {
@@ -6642,13 +6662,16 @@ var FAILED = /* @__PURE__ */ Symbol("parse-failed");
 
 // src/ir.ts
 function mutationId(m) {
-  return typeof m === "string" ? m : m.id;
+  if (m == null) return void 0;
+  if (typeof m === "string") return m;
+  return typeof m.id === "string" ? m.id : void 0;
 }
 function hasMutation(list, idOrPrefix) {
   if (!Array.isArray(list)) return false;
   const prefix = idOrPrefix.endsWith("*") ? idOrPrefix.slice(0, -1) : void 0;
   return list.some((m) => {
     const id = mutationId(m);
+    if (id === void 0) return false;
     return prefix !== void 0 ? id.startsWith(prefix) : id === idOrPrefix;
   });
 }
@@ -8625,6 +8648,13 @@ function combineOrderSwappedVerdicts(run1, run2) {
   if (run1 === run2) return run1;
   return "tied";
 }
+var ALT_STRATEGY_IDS = [
+  "discipline-gates-v1-alt",
+  "discipline-gates-v1-alt-blind"
+];
+function isAltStrategy(id) {
+  return id !== void 0 && ALT_STRATEGY_IDS.includes(id);
+}
 function replayRetryDelayMs(errorCode) {
   return errorCode === "rate_limit" ? 65e3 : 2e3;
 }
@@ -8678,7 +8708,34 @@ function altGatesBlockFor(args) {
     ...shapeAltering
   ]);
 }
+var ALT_BLIND_TOKEN_BUDGET_BREACH = {
+  ceilingTokens: 264,
+  measuredTokensTextWithTools: 285,
+  note: "Blind arm exceeds the stated 264-token ceiling on text+tools (285) and costs ~2.4x the v1-alt arm. Not corrected: compressing it would require editing prose the arm depends on NOT having been edited by this seat. Read a blind-arm LOSS as confounded by token tax; a WIN is unaffected."
+};
+var DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_ALT_BLIND_HEADER = "Before stating any conclusion, run this check:";
+var ALT_BLIND_BULLETS = {
+  falsify: "- Before committing to an approach, state in one line what evidence would prove it wrong and how you would notice it. If nothing could falsify the approach, you hold a preference, not a plan \u2014 rework it until something could.",
+  deviation: "- When you choose not to follow an applicable instruction, say so explicitly: name the instruction, why you are deviating, and what you are doing instead. Silent deviation is forbidden \u2014 an override is only legitimate when it is visible.",
+  toolPredict: "- When using tools: before each call, state the result you expect. On mismatch, treat the gap as evidence your model of the system is wrong \u2014 revise the model before acting again; never silently retry.",
+  verifyDelegated: "- Verify every delegated or sub-agent result before composing it into an answer: spot-check it against the source or an independent probe. An unverified sub-result is a claim you are repeating, not a fact you know.",
+  markAssumed: '- In the final answer, keep verified claims and assumptions visibly distinct: mark anything unchecked as "assumed" or "unverified". Never let an assumption borrow the confidence of the verified claims beside it.'
+};
+function altBlindGatesBlockFor(args) {
+  const parts = [
+    "falsify",
+    "deviation",
+    ...args.hasTools ? ["toolPredict"] : [],
+    "verifyDelegated",
+    ...args.outputMode === "text" ? ["markAssumed"] : []
+  ];
+  return [
+    DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_ALT_BLIND_HEADER,
+    ...parts.map((p) => ALT_BLIND_BULLETS[p])
+  ].join("\n");
+}
 var STRATEGY_ALT_SECTION_ID = "__kgauto_strategy_eval_gates_alt__";
+var STRATEGY_ALT_BLIND_SECTION_ID = "__kgauto_strategy_eval_gates_alt_blind__";
 function withAltDisciplineContract(ir) {
   const outputMode = resolveOutputMode({
     declared: ir.constraints?.outputMode,
@@ -8697,6 +8754,28 @@ function withAltDisciplineContract(ir) {
     ]
   };
 }
+function withAltBlindDisciplineContract(ir) {
+  const outputMode = resolveOutputMode({
+    declared: ir.constraints?.outputMode,
+    structuredOutput: ir.constraints?.structuredOutput,
+    toolCount: ir.tools?.length ?? 0
+  });
+  const hasTools = (ir.tools?.length ?? 0) > 0;
+  return {
+    ...ir,
+    sections: [
+      ...ir.sections ?? [],
+      {
+        id: STRATEGY_ALT_BLIND_SECTION_ID,
+        text: altBlindGatesBlockFor({ outputMode, hasTools })
+      }
+    ]
+  };
+}
+var ALT_SECTION_ID_BY_STRATEGY = {
+  "discipline-gates-v1-alt": STRATEGY_ALT_SECTION_ID,
+  "discipline-gates-v1-alt-blind": STRATEGY_ALT_BLIND_SECTION_ID
+};
 async function runGoldenEval(opts) {
   const fetchFn = opts.fetchImpl ?? fetch;
   const progress = opts.onProgress ?? (() => {
@@ -8764,7 +8843,9 @@ async function runGoldenEval(opts) {
   }
   const armBIr = (ir) => {
     if (axis !== "strategy") return ir;
-    return strategyId === "discipline-gates-v1-alt" ? withAltDisciplineContract(ir) : withDisciplineContract(ir);
+    if (strategyId === "discipline-gates-v1-alt") return withAltDisciplineContract(ir);
+    if (strategyId === "discipline-gates-v1-alt-blind") return withAltBlindDisciplineContract(ir);
+    return withDisciplineContract(ir);
   };
   const replay = async (ir, model, captureGates = false) => {
     let gates;
@@ -8776,13 +8857,14 @@ async function runGoldenEval(opts) {
       };
       const compiled = compile(evalIr);
       if (captureGates) {
-        if (strategyId === "discipline-gates-v1-alt") {
+        if (isAltStrategy(strategyId)) {
+          const altSectionId = ALT_SECTION_ID_BY_STRATEGY[strategyId];
           const altSection = (evalIr.sections ?? []).find(
-            (s) => s.id === STRATEGY_ALT_SECTION_ID
+            (s) => s.id === altSectionId
           );
           gates = {
             fired: altSection !== void 0 && altSection.text.length > 0,
-            rule: "discipline-gates-v1-alt",
+            rule: strategyId,
             gateTokens: altSection ? countTokens(`${altSection.text}
 
 `) : 0
@@ -9213,7 +9295,8 @@ function classifyStrategyOutcome(r) {
   if (r.losses > r.wins) return "loses";
   return "ties";
 }
-var STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_LIMITATION = "Both gate wordings share one author (kgauto-Cairn); a shared blind spot is invisible to this experiment. Strong verdicts: both-lose (mechanism) and v1-loses/alt-wins (wording). An independently-authored alt would strengthen every other cell.";
+var STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_LIMITATION = "Only the v1 wording was measured on this run; no re-wording arm was triggered, so this result says nothing about whether the wording or the mechanism produced it.";
+var STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_INDEPENDENT = "Three arms: v1 and one re-wording by this seat, plus an independently authored arm (context-free subagent, no repo access, no knowledge of the experiment). A both-lose verdict therefore spans independent authorship and is not explained by one author's blind spot. Residual limitation: all three arms encode a similar set of underlying principles, so a wrong CHOICE of principles remains harder to see than a wrong wording of them.";
 async function runStrategyEvalWithAttribution(opts) {
   const primary = await runGoldenEval({
     ...opts,
@@ -9230,9 +9313,20 @@ async function runStrategyEvalWithAttribution(opts) {
     axis: "strategy",
     strategy: "discipline-gates-v1-alt"
   });
-  const altOutcome = classifyStrategyOutcome(alt);
-  const attribution = altOutcome === "wins" ? "wording-failure" : altOutcome === "loses" ? "mechanism-failure" : "wording-inconclusive";
-  return { attribution, primary, alt, limitation: STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_LIMITATION };
+  const altBlind = await runGoldenEval({
+    ...opts,
+    axis: "strategy",
+    strategy: "discipline-gates-v1-alt-blind"
+  });
+  const outcomes = [classifyStrategyOutcome(alt), classifyStrategyOutcome(altBlind)];
+  const attribution = outcomes.includes("wins") ? "wording-failure" : outcomes.every((o) => o === "loses") ? "mechanism-failure" : "wording-inconclusive";
+  return {
+    attribution,
+    primary,
+    alt,
+    altBlind,
+    limitation: STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_INDEPENDENT
+  };
 }
 
 // src/brain-proxy.ts
@@ -9864,6 +9958,30 @@ function createDelegate(opts) {
 }
 
 // src/advisories-api.ts
+var BURST_SPAN_MS = 5 * 60 * 1e3;
+function classifyEvidenceWindow(row) {
+  const { evidence_first_at: first, evidence_last_at: last, evidence_n: n } = row;
+  if (typeof first !== "string" || typeof last !== "string") return null;
+  if (typeof n !== "number" || !Number.isFinite(n) || n <= 0) return null;
+  const t0 = Date.parse(first);
+  const t1 = Date.parse(last);
+  if (Number.isNaN(t0) || Number.isNaN(t1)) return null;
+  const spanMs = Math.max(0, t1 - t0);
+  return { firstAt: first, lastAt: last, n, spanMs, isBurst: spanMs < BURST_SPAN_MS };
+}
+function formatEvidenceSpan(spanMs) {
+  if (spanMs < 1e3) return `${spanMs}ms`;
+  const s = Math.round(spanMs / 1e3);
+  if (s < 90) return `${s}s`;
+  const m = Math.round(s / 60);
+  if (m < 90) return `${m}m`;
+  const h = Math.round(m / 60);
+  if (h < 48) return `${h}h`;
+  return `${Math.round(h / 24)}d`;
+}
+function burstCaveat(w) {
+  return `Evidence is ${w.n} observation${w.n === 1 ? "" : "s"} spanning ${formatEvidenceSpan(w.spanMs)} (${w.firstAt} \u2192 ${w.lastAt}) \u2014 that is a single burst, not a standing rate. Check it against your own deploy log before acting: a cluster this tight is usually one incident, and may already be fixed.`;
+}
 var SEVERITY_SET = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(["info", "warn", "critical"]);
 var STATUS_SET = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(["open", "snoozed", "resolved"]);
 var RESOLUTION_SOURCE_SET = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([
@@ -9903,10 +10021,18 @@ function rowToAdvisory(row) {
     if (docsLink) suggestedFix.docsLink = docsLink;
     if (suggestion) suggestedFix.before = suggestion;
   }
+  const evidenceWindow = classifyEvidenceWindow(
+    row
+  );
+  const declaredSeverity = asSeverity(row.severity);
+  const downgraded = evidenceWindow?.isBurst === true && declaredSeverity === "critical";
+  const effectiveSeverity = downgraded ? "warn" : declaredSeverity;
   const out = {
     id: typeof row.id === "string" ? row.id : "",
     rule: typeof row.rule === "string" ? row.rule : "",
-    severity: asSeverity(row.severity),
+    severity: effectiveSeverity,
+    evidenceWindow,
+    ...downgraded ? { severityBeforeBurstDowngrade: declaredSeverity } : {},
     openedAt: typeof row.opened_at === "string" ? row.opened_at : "",
     lastObservedAt: typeof row.last_observed_at === "string" ? row.last_observed_at : "",
     observationCount: typeof row.observation_count === "number" ? row.observation_count : 0,
@@ -9914,7 +10040,13 @@ function rowToAdvisory(row) {
       ...archetype ? { archetype } : {},
       ...model ? { model } : {}
     },
-    message: typeof row.message === "string" ? row.message : "",
+    // The caveat goes INLINE in the message, not only in `evidenceWindow`.
+    // A structured field a consumer must think to read is the same defect
+    // one layer along: the substrate knowing and not telling. The whole
+    // point is that the check costs a glance rather than a query.
+    message: (typeof row.message === "string" ? row.message : "") + (evidenceWindow?.isBurst ? `
+
+${burstCaveat(evidenceWindow)}` : ""),
     suggestedFix,
     autoApplicable: false,
     // reserved — alpha.30+
@@ -10452,9 +10584,12 @@ function compile2(ir, opts) {
   ABSOLUTE_FLOOR,
   ALIASES,
   ALL_ARCHETYPES,
+  ALT_BLIND_TOKEN_BUDGET_BREACH,
+  ALT_STRATEGY_IDS,
   ARCHETYPE_FAMILY_FITS,
   ARCHETYPE_FLOOR_DEFAULT,
   BRAIN_READ_ENV_NAMES,
+  BURST_SPAN_MS,
   COACH_CFG,
   COST_RANKING_REFERENCE_SHAPE,
   CallError,
@@ -10465,6 +10600,7 @@ function compile2(ir, opts) {
   DEFAULT_PROMOTIONS_ENDPOINT,
   DELEGATE_TOOL_DEFINITION,
   DIALECT_VERSION,
+  DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_ALT_BLIND_HEADER,
   DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_ALT_HEADER,
   FamilyResolutionError,
   INTENT_ARCHETYPES,
@@ -10481,6 +10617,7 @@ function compile2(ir, opts) {
   RULE_DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1,
   RULE_DISCIPLINE_GATES_V1_STRUCTURED,
   RULE_SEQUENTIAL_TOOL_CLIFF,
+  STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_INDEPENDENT,
   STRATEGY_AUTHORSHIP_LIMITATION,
   TRANSLATOR_FLOOR,
   _testResetMeasuredFailure,
@@ -10488,6 +10625,7 @@ function compile2(ir, opts) {
   _testWaitForMeasuredFailureRefresh,
   _testWaitForPromotionsRefresh,
   allProfiles,
+  altBlindGatesBlockFor,
   altGatesBlockFor,
   applyArchetypeConvention,
   applySectionRewrites,
@@ -10501,9 +10639,11 @@ function compile2(ir, opts) {
   buildLLMJudge,
   buildPairwiseJudgePrompt,
   buildShadowProbeRow,
+  burstCaveat,
   call,
   captureGoldenIr,
   chainProviderSpread,
+  classifyEvidenceWindow,
   classifyStrategyOutcome,
   clearBrain,
   combineOrderSwappedVerdicts,
@@ -10523,6 +10663,7 @@ function compile2(ir, opts) {
   execute,
   findBetterFit,
   flushBrainDeadLetter,
+  formatEvidenceSpan,
   getActionableAdvisories,
   getAllStarterChains,
   getAllStarterChainsWithGrounding,
@@ -10544,6 +10685,7 @@ function compile2(ir, opts) {
   getStarterChainWithGrounding,
   hasMutation,
   hashShape,
+  isAltStrategy,
   isArchetype,
   isAutoPromoteEnabledFromEnv,
   isBrainQueryActiveFor,
@@ -10589,6 +10731,7 @@ function compile2(ir, opts) {
   resolveGoldenCaptureRate,
   resolvePricingAt,
   resolveProviderKey,
+  rowToAdvisory,
   rubricFor,
   runAdvisor,
   runGoldenEval,
@@ -10597,6 +10740,7 @@ function compile2(ir, opts) {
   shouldCaptureGolden,
   tryGetProfile,
   wilsonLowerBound,
+  withAltBlindDisciplineContract,
   withAltDisciplineContract,
   withDisciplineContract
 });