@wairon/cli 5.1.1-dev.45 → 5.1.1-dev.46
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/cli/index.js +48 -24
- package/dist/cli/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/index.js +48 -24
- package/dist/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
package/dist/index.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ var init_defaults = __esm({
|
|
|
1222
1222
|
copilot: ".github/prompts",
|
|
1223
1223
|
codex: ".codex/agents"
|
|
1224
1224
|
};
|
|
1225
|
-
WAIRON_VERSION = "5.1.1-dev.
|
|
1225
|
+
WAIRON_VERSION = "5.1.1-dev.46";
|
|
1226
1226
|
GITHUB_REPO = "SYW-Apps/Waffle-AIron";
|
|
1227
1227
|
ARCHITECT_AGENT_ID = "agent-architect";
|
|
1228
1228
|
ARCHITECT_TEMPLATE_ID = "architect";
|
|
@@ -2230,8 +2230,12 @@ var init_specs = __esm({
|
|
|
2230
2230
|
* so a lower detail dial no longer vouches for everything the component
|
|
2231
2231
|
* declares. Each entry gets the same target validation a `call` step gets
|
|
2232
2232
|
* (the component resolves, the caller declares it, the method is on its
|
|
2233
|
-
* contract)
|
|
2234
|
-
*
|
|
2233
|
+
* contract) AND the same code↔spec reading (call-conformance, both
|
|
2234
|
+
* directions): an entry asserts the same call a step does, minus the
|
|
2235
|
+
* position in the flow that check never reads, so it can no more buy
|
|
2236
|
+
* reachability without the code than a step can. Refused beside a non-empty
|
|
2237
|
+
* narrative, where the steps already say what is called and a second
|
|
2238
|
+
* spelling could only disagree.
|
|
2235
2239
|
*/
|
|
2236
2240
|
calls: import_zod8.z.array(import_zod8.z.string().min(1)).optional(),
|
|
2237
2241
|
/**
|
|
@@ -13559,6 +13563,18 @@ function resolveCallTarget(ctx, componentId, methodName) {
|
|
|
13559
13563
|
}
|
|
13560
13564
|
return { accepted, files };
|
|
13561
13565
|
}
|
|
13566
|
+
function claimsOf(implMethod) {
|
|
13567
|
+
const claims = [];
|
|
13568
|
+
for (const step of implMethod.narrative) {
|
|
13569
|
+
if (step.type !== "call" || !step.targetComponent || !step.targetMethod) continue;
|
|
13570
|
+
claims.push({ step: step.stepNumber, component: step.targetComponent, method: step.targetMethod });
|
|
13571
|
+
}
|
|
13572
|
+
for (const ref of implMethod.calls ?? []) {
|
|
13573
|
+
const parsed = parseDeclaredCall(ref);
|
|
13574
|
+
if (parsed) claims.push({ component: parsed.compId, method: parsed.methodName });
|
|
13575
|
+
}
|
|
13576
|
+
return claims;
|
|
13577
|
+
}
|
|
13562
13578
|
function describeSite(site) {
|
|
13563
13579
|
if (!site.member) return `${site.name}(\u2026)`;
|
|
13564
13580
|
if (site.via) return `${site.via}.${site.name}(\u2026)`;
|
|
@@ -13567,23 +13583,26 @@ function describeSite(site) {
|
|
|
13567
13583
|
return `<receiver>.${site.name}(\u2026)`;
|
|
13568
13584
|
}
|
|
13569
13585
|
function describeMiss(m) {
|
|
13570
|
-
const
|
|
13586
|
+
const where = m.step === void 0 ? "declared call" : `step ${m.step}`;
|
|
13587
|
+
const head = `${where} \u2192 ${m.target} (looked for ${m.accepted.map((a) => `"${a}"`).join(" / ")}`;
|
|
13571
13588
|
if (m.miss.kind === "elsewhere") return `${head}, called but resolved to ${m.miss.landed.map((p) => `"${p}"`).join(", ")})`;
|
|
13572
13589
|
if (m.miss.kind === "unresolved") return `${head}, written as ${m.miss.shapes.map((s) => `\`${s}\``).join(" / ")})`;
|
|
13573
13590
|
return `${head})`;
|
|
13574
13591
|
}
|
|
13575
|
-
var callConformanceRule;
|
|
13592
|
+
var unitOf, claimNoun, callConformanceRule;
|
|
13576
13593
|
var init_call_conformance = __esm({
|
|
13577
13594
|
"src/core/rules/conformance/call-conformance.ts"() {
|
|
13578
13595
|
"use strict";
|
|
13579
13596
|
init_models();
|
|
13597
|
+
unitOf = (m) => m.step === void 0 ? m.target : `${m.step}:${m.target}`;
|
|
13598
|
+
claimNoun = (implMethod) => implMethod.narrative.length ? "narrative call step(s)" : "declared call(s)";
|
|
13580
13599
|
callConformanceRule = {
|
|
13581
13600
|
name: "call-conformance",
|
|
13582
|
-
description: "Code\u2194spec Level 3: the
|
|
13601
|
+
description: "Code\u2194spec Level 3: the CLAIMED call \u2194 realized call relation, judged both ways against the method's own source file (its sourcePath, else the implementation's), at exact analysis grade only. A method claims a call two ways and they face one check: a narrative `call` step, and an entry of the declared `calls` a narrative-less method reaches its collaborators through. They assert the same thing, and the step number is no part of the claim \u2014 this check never reads order, so it is only how a finding points at one. Forward: every claim must be realized by a call whose callee RESOLVES TO one of the target method's own source files \u2014 the target's contract name or a per-method `symbol` override, closed transitively over the named helpers the realized function calls, and resolved against every file the call CAN have reached: a `this.<field>.<method>()` receiver followed through the field's DECLARED TYPE, a `new Class(...).<method>()` receiver through the module its CLASS NAME came from. A matching call whose origin a pure model cannot resolve is reported apart as CALL_ORIGIN_UNRESOLVED, which NAMES the shape it could not follow and asks for nothing \u2014 a coverage hole in the reader, reported for the reason CONFORMANCE_DEGRADED is: a silently degraded gate is worse than a degraded one. A finding names a landing only from the PROVEN tier so that widening what a call reached can accept a claim but never accuse one, and a target that names no file of its own falls back to name membership. Converse: a call that resolves to a modelled method of ANOTHER component in the SAME file crosses a component boundary while looking local, so the method must claim it \u2014 in a step or in `calls` (UNDECLARED_COLOCATED_CALL) \u2014 judged on the proven tier alone, and a same-file private helper is no modelled method and is never reported. A method that claims nothing at all is judged in neither direction: what it leaves unsaid is UNUSED_*'s subject. Order, arguments and conditions stay unverified, dispatch steps (runtime-table routed) are no claim about a call site, a malformed declared reference is MALFORMED_DECLARED_CALL's finding and names no target here, the conformance dial (off) skips, and weaker analysis grades never guess.",
|
|
13583
13602
|
codes: [
|
|
13584
|
-
{ code: "CALL_STEP_UNREALIZED", defaultSeverity: "warning", summary: "Narrative call step realized by no call that resolves to the target method's own source file \u2014 the call is absent, or it lands in another module", carryable: true },
|
|
13585
|
-
{ code: "CALL_ORIGIN_UNRESOLVED", defaultSeverity: "warning", summary: "Narrative call step whose target name IS called, but only from call sites written in a shape this analysis cannot resolve to a file \u2014 the
|
|
13586
|
-
{ code: "UNDECLARED_COLOCATED_CALL", defaultSeverity: "warning", summary: "The realized function calls a modelled method of another component living in the same source file, and
|
|
13603
|
+
{ code: "CALL_STEP_UNREALIZED", defaultSeverity: "warning", summary: "Narrative call step or declared call realized by no call that resolves to the target method's own source file \u2014 the call is absent, or it lands in another module", carryable: true },
|
|
13604
|
+
{ code: "CALL_ORIGIN_UNRESOLVED", defaultSeverity: "warning", summary: "Narrative call step or declared call whose target name IS called, but only from call sites written in a shape this analysis cannot resolve to a file \u2014 the claim was not checked, and is neither proven realized nor accused", carryable: true },
|
|
13605
|
+
{ code: "UNDECLARED_COLOCATED_CALL", defaultSeverity: "warning", summary: "The realized function calls a modelled method of another component living in the same source file, and neither a narrative step nor a declared call names it", carryable: true }
|
|
13587
13606
|
],
|
|
13588
13607
|
check(ctx) {
|
|
13589
13608
|
const code = ctx.codeIndex();
|
|
@@ -13600,7 +13619,7 @@ var init_call_conformance = __esm({
|
|
|
13600
13619
|
const { implementation: impl, method: implMethod, component, sourceFile: file } = entry;
|
|
13601
13620
|
const tier = implMethod.conformance ?? impl.conformance ?? defaultConformanceTier(component);
|
|
13602
13621
|
if (tier === "off") continue;
|
|
13603
|
-
if (!implMethod.narrative.length) continue;
|
|
13622
|
+
if (!implMethod.narrative.length && !implMethod.calls?.length) continue;
|
|
13604
13623
|
if (!file) continue;
|
|
13605
13624
|
const facts = code.factsAt(file);
|
|
13606
13625
|
if (!facts || facts.status !== "analyzed" || facts.analysisGrade !== "exact") continue;
|
|
@@ -13610,16 +13629,15 @@ var init_call_conformance = __esm({
|
|
|
13610
13629
|
const sites = closedCallSites(code, file, fnSymbol);
|
|
13611
13630
|
if (!sites) continue;
|
|
13612
13631
|
const missed = [];
|
|
13613
|
-
for (const
|
|
13614
|
-
if (
|
|
13615
|
-
|
|
13616
|
-
const target = resolveCallTarget(ctx, step.targetComponent, step.targetMethod);
|
|
13632
|
+
for (const claim of claimsOf(implMethod)) {
|
|
13633
|
+
if (!ctx.componentMap.has(claim.component)) continue;
|
|
13634
|
+
const target = resolveCallTarget(ctx, claim.component, claim.method);
|
|
13617
13635
|
if (target.accepted.has(fnSymbol)) continue;
|
|
13618
13636
|
const matching = sites.filter((s) => target.accepted.has(s.name));
|
|
13619
|
-
const ref = `${
|
|
13637
|
+
const ref = `${claim.component}.${claim.method}`;
|
|
13620
13638
|
if (target.files.size === 0) {
|
|
13621
13639
|
if (matching.length === 0) {
|
|
13622
|
-
missed.push({ step: step
|
|
13640
|
+
missed.push({ step: claim.step, target: ref, accepted: [...target.accepted], miss: { kind: "absent" } });
|
|
13623
13641
|
}
|
|
13624
13642
|
continue;
|
|
13625
13643
|
}
|
|
@@ -13633,7 +13651,7 @@ var init_call_conformance = __esm({
|
|
|
13633
13651
|
}
|
|
13634
13652
|
if (realized) continue;
|
|
13635
13653
|
const miss = matching.length === 0 ? { kind: "absent" } : landed.size === 0 ? { kind: "unresolved", shapes: [...new Set(matching.map(describeSite))].sort() } : { kind: "elsewhere", landed: [...landed].sort() };
|
|
13636
|
-
missed.push({ step: step
|
|
13654
|
+
missed.push({ step: claim.step, target: ref, accepted: [...target.accepted], miss });
|
|
13637
13655
|
}
|
|
13638
13656
|
const unrealized = missed.filter((m) => m.miss.kind !== "unresolved");
|
|
13639
13657
|
const unresolved = missed.filter((m) => m.miss.kind === "unresolved");
|
|
@@ -13641,30 +13659,36 @@ var init_call_conformance = __esm({
|
|
|
13641
13659
|
ctx.addIssue(
|
|
13642
13660
|
"warning",
|
|
13643
13661
|
"CALL_STEP_UNREALIZED",
|
|
13644
|
-
`Method "${implMethod.name}" in implementation "${impl.id}": ${unrealized.length}
|
|
13662
|
+
`Method "${implMethod.name}" in implementation "${impl.id}": ${unrealized.length} ${claimNoun(implMethod)} are realized by no call of the function "${fnSymbol}" in "${file}" that resolves to the target's own source file \u2014 ${unrealized.map(describeMiss).join("; ")}. Callees are closed over the named helpers the function calls, and each call site is resolved through this file's import bindings (order, arguments and conditions are not checked). Realize the calls, fix what the method claims, or map code names via per-method symbols on the targets.`,
|
|
13645
13663
|
impl.id,
|
|
13646
13664
|
entry.draftContext,
|
|
13647
13665
|
void 0,
|
|
13648
|
-
//
|
|
13649
|
-
//
|
|
13650
|
-
|
|
13666
|
+
// One claim, named the way the register names a unit: a step by its
|
|
13667
|
+
// number and target, a declaration by its target alone. What the
|
|
13668
|
+
// register carries is ONE unrealized claim, never "this method's
|
|
13669
|
+
// calls".
|
|
13670
|
+
{ at: implMethod.name, covers: unrealized.map(unitOf) }
|
|
13651
13671
|
);
|
|
13652
13672
|
}
|
|
13653
13673
|
if (unresolved.length) {
|
|
13654
13674
|
ctx.addIssue(
|
|
13655
13675
|
"warning",
|
|
13656
13676
|
"CALL_ORIGIN_UNRESOLVED",
|
|
13657
|
-
`Method "${implMethod.name}" in implementation "${impl.id}": ${unresolved.length}
|
|
13677
|
+
`Method "${implMethod.name}" in implementation "${impl.id}": ${unresolved.length} ${claimNoun(implMethod)} ARE called by name inside the function "${fnSymbol}" in "${file}", but every site calling them is written in a shape this analysis cannot resolve to a file \u2014 ${unresolved.map(describeMiss).join("; ")}. What resolves is a name bound to a module of THIS project: a bare or namespaced call through such an import binding, a \`this.<field>\` receiver whose declared type names one, a \`new Class(\u2026)\` receiver whose class does. What does not: an import from a PACKAGE specifier, a receiver holding a value the module assembled, a receiver this model records no name for. This reports what was not checked, not what is wrong \u2014 the claim is neither proven realized nor accused of being missing, and no working call is asked to be rewritten to suit the reader.`,
|
|
13658
13678
|
impl.id,
|
|
13659
13679
|
entry.draftContext,
|
|
13660
13680
|
void 0,
|
|
13661
|
-
{ at: implMethod.name, covers: unresolved.map(
|
|
13681
|
+
{ at: implMethod.name, covers: unresolved.map(unitOf) }
|
|
13662
13682
|
);
|
|
13663
13683
|
}
|
|
13664
13684
|
const declared = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set();
|
|
13665
13685
|
for (const step of implMethod.narrative) {
|
|
13666
13686
|
if (step.targetComponent && step.targetMethod) declared.add(`${step.targetComponent}.${step.targetMethod}`);
|
|
13667
13687
|
}
|
|
13688
|
+
for (const ref of implMethod.calls ?? []) {
|
|
13689
|
+
const parsed = parseDeclaredCall(ref);
|
|
13690
|
+
if (parsed) declared.add(`${parsed.compId}.${parsed.methodName}`);
|
|
13691
|
+
}
|
|
13668
13692
|
const crossings = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
|
|
13669
13693
|
for (const site of closedCallSites(code, file, fnSymbol, new Set(colocated.keys())) ?? []) {
|
|
13670
13694
|
const owner = colocated.get(site.name);
|
|
@@ -13679,7 +13703,7 @@ var init_call_conformance = __esm({
|
|
|
13679
13703
|
ctx.addIssue(
|
|
13680
13704
|
"warning",
|
|
13681
13705
|
"UNDECLARED_COLOCATED_CALL",
|
|
13682
|
-
`Method "${implMethod.name}" in implementation "${impl.id}": the function "${fnSymbol}" in "${file}" calls ${crossings.size} modelled method(s) of OTHER components living in that same file, and
|
|
13706
|
+
`Method "${implMethod.name}" in implementation "${impl.id}": the function "${fnSymbol}" in "${file}" calls ${crossings.size} modelled method(s) of OTHER components living in that same file, and neither a narrative step nor a declared call names it \u2014 ${detail}. Sharing a file does not make the hop internal: it crosses a component boundary nothing imports, so no file-level check can see it. Narrate the call, declare it in \`calls\`, or move the code so the boundary is real.`,
|
|
13683
13707
|
impl.id,
|
|
13684
13708
|
entry.draftContext,
|
|
13685
13709
|
void 0,
|