@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter 1.3.2 → 2.0.0-dev

package/README.md

@@ -1,299 +1,303 @@
-<div align="center">
-  <img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/ddbfifdxd/image/upload/w_200,q_auto,f_auto/v1786386427/VS_logo_TextoAbaixo_yev4tq.png" alt="VSRepository Logo" width="200"/>
-
-  <p style="margin-top: 12px;">
-    <img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter?style=flat-square" alt="npm version"/>
-    <img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/l/@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter?style=flat-square" alt="npm license"/>
-    <img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/dt/@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter?style=flat-square" alt="npm downloads"/>
-    <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/inspired%20by-JpaRepository-E73121?style=flat-square" alt="inspired by JpaRepository"/>
-  </p>
-</div>
-
-# VSRepoPrisma7Adapter
-
-🇧🇷 [Ler em português](./README.pt-BR.md)
-
-> ✅ **Released.** This adapter is published to npm as `@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter`, targeting [VSRepository](https://github.com/jaobrabo123/VSRepository). It's currently the only officially published adapter for v2 — adapters for other ORMs are planned but not published yet (see [Adapter status](https://github.com/jaobrabo123/VSRepository#adapter-status) in the VSRepository README).
-
-`VSRepoAdapter` implementation for [VSRepository v2](https://github.com/jaobrabo123/VSRepository) backed by [Prisma 7](https://www.prisma.io/). It translates every `VSRepository` operation into Prisma Client calls, resolving `VSRepoWhere`, `Ordering`, `select`/`relations` through dedicated parsers, and — when a `relations` config is provided — resolving relation fields on `create`/`update`/`upsert`/`merge` the same way the v1 of VSRepository used to.
-
----
-
-## Table of contents
-
-- [Installation](#installation)
-- [Basic usage](#basic-usage)
-- [Constructor config](#constructor-config)
-- [Relations](#relations)
-  - [The two `relations`](#the-two-relations)
-  - [`relations` in the constructor (write)](#relations-in-the-constructor-write)
-    - [`mode`](#mode)
-    - [`restriction`](#restriction)
-    - [`pk` and `nullable`](#pk-and-nullable)
-    - [How each write method resolves relations](#how-each-write-method-resolves-relations)
-  - [`relations` in method options (read)](#relations-in-method-options-read)
-- [`merge`](#merge)
-- [Atomic and aggregation methods](#atomic-and-aggregation-methods)
-- [`createMany`/`createManyReturning`/`updateMany`/`updateManyReturning` don't support nested writes](#createmanycreatemanyreturningupdatemanyupdatemanyreturning-dont-support-nested-writes)
-- [Provider-specific limitations](#provider-specific-limitations)
-- [Transactions](#transactions)
-- [Logging](#logging)
-- [Requirements](#requirements)
-
----
-
-## Installation
-
-```bash
-npm install vsrepo @prisma/client @vsrepo/prisma7-adapter
-```
-
-Both `vsrepo` and `@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter` are published to npm and ready to use.
-
-## Basic usage
-
-```typescript
-import { VSRepository, VSLogLevel } from "vsrepo";
-import { Prisma7Adapter, Prisma7OrmTypes } from "@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter";
-import { Prisma, PrismaClient } from "./generated/prisma/client";
-import { prisma } from "./prisma";
-
-type User = Prisma.UserGetPayload<{ include: { posts: true } }>;
-type MyOrmTypes = Prisma7OrmTypes<PrismaClient>;
-
-class UserRepository extends VSRepository<User, string, MyOrmTypes> {
-    constructor() {
-        super({
-            adapter: new Prisma7Adapter(prisma, {
-                tableName: "user",
-                pkName: "id",
-                relations: {
-                    posts: { mode: "otm", restriction: "add", pk: "id" },
-                },
-                logLevel: VSLogLevel.WARN,
-            }),
-        });
-    }
-}
-
-const userRepository = new UserRepository();
-
-const user = await userRepository.get({ id: "..." }, { relations: { posts: true } });
-```
-
-Here the `relations` you pass in the method `options` — shaped like `{ field: true }` — is transformed into a Prisma `include` by the adapter (see [`relations` in method options (read)](#relations-in-method-options-read)). If you supply `select`, the `relations`/`include` is ignored. Don't confuse it with the constructor-config `relations`, which describes how relation fields are resolved in write payloads — the difference is explained in [The two `relations`](#the-two-relations).
-
-`Prisma7OrmTypes<DB>` ties `VSRepository`'s `getDbClient()`/`transaction()` return types to your real, generated Prisma types — see [Transactions](#transactions).
-
-## Constructor config
-
-```typescript
-new Prisma7Adapter(prisma, {
-    tableName: "user", // required — the Prisma Client model/delegate name, as in `prisma.user`
-    pkName: "id",       // required — the entity's primary key field name
-    relations: { ... }, // optional — see "relations in the constructor (write)" below
-    logLevel: VSLogLevel.WARN, // optional — default: VSLogLevel.WARN
-});
-```
-
-The config is validated at construction time — an invalid `tableName`/`pkName`/`relations`/`logLevel` throws a `VSRepoAdapterError` naming the offending field.
-
-## Relations
-
-### The two `relations`
-
-The name `relations` appears in **two different places** in the API, with **different shapes and purposes** — easy to confuse. In a nutshell:
-
-| | `relations` in the **constructor** | `relations` in **method options** |
-| --- | --- | --- |
-| Where you define it | `new Prisma7Adapter(prisma, { relations: ... })` | `repository.get(where, { relations: ... })` — and other methods |
-| Shape | One **config object** per field: `{ mode, restriction, pk, nullable? }` | One **`true`/sub-object** per field: `{ posts: true }` |
-| Purpose | **Write** — when a `create`/`update`/`upsert`/`save`/`merge` payload contains a relation field, tells the adapter how to turn it into a Prisma nested write (`create`/`connectOrCreate`/`upsert`/`disconnect`/`deleteMany`/`set`) | **Read** — eager loading: which relations to fetch alongside the result (becomes a Prisma `include`) |
-| Consumed by | `parsePrismaWriteData` / `mergeEntities` (write resolvers) | `parsePrismaInclude` (via `resolveReadArg`) |
-| Depends on the other? | No — it only affects writes/`merge` | No — it works even with no `relations` in the constructor |
-
-Neither depends on the other: the method-options `relations` does eager loading even when the constructor has no `relations`, and the constructor `relations` governs write behavior even if you never pass `relations` in options. The two subsections below cover each one.
-
-### `relations` in the constructor (write)
-
-The `relations` config on the constructor describes, for each relation field of your entity, **how the adapter should resolve that field when it shows up in write payloads** (`create`/`update`/`upsert`/`save`/`merge`) — the same behavior the v1 of VSRepository had.
-
-Each relation is configured by its field name:
-
-```typescript
-relations: {
-    posts: { mode: "otm", restriction: "add", pk: "id" },
-    address: { mode: "oto", restriction: "set", pk: "id" },
-    author: { mode: "mto", restriction: "set", pk: "id", nullable: true },
-}
-```
-
-Without `relations`, every field — including relation fields — is passed straight through to Prisma's `where`/`data`/`create`/`update`, as-is. That's fine for scalar fields, but Prisma expects a very specific nested-write shape (`create`/`connectOrCreate`/`upsert`/`disconnect`/`deleteMany`/`set`) for relation fields, so if your entity has relations you'll usually want to configure them.
-
-#### `mode`
-
-Cardinality of the relation, from the point of view of the entity that owns the field:
-
-| `mode` | Meaning | Field shape you send |
-| --- | --- | --- |
-| `oto` | one-to-one | a single object, or `null` |
-| `mto` | many-to-one | a single object, or `null` |
-| `otm` | one-to-many | an array of objects |
-| `mtm` | many-to-many | an array of objects |
-
-#### `restriction`
-
-Controls how `save`/`update`/`upsert` handle relation items that already exist (matched by `pk`) and, for to-many relations, items that were **not** included in the payload:
-
-- **`"add"`** — only creates/connects/upserts the items you send. Existing items that aren't in the payload are left untouched.
-- **`"set"`** — same as `"add"`, but also removes what wasn't sent: for `otm` it runs a `deleteMany` on the items missing from the array; for `mtm` it resets the join (`set: []`) before reconnecting; for `oto`/`mto` with `nullable: true`, sending `null` deletes/disconnects the relation (see below).
-
-#### `pk` and `nullable`
-
-- **`pk`** — the field used to identify an existing related record. An item **with** `pk` in the payload becomes a `connectOrCreate`/`upsert`; an item **without** it becomes a plain `create`.
-- **`nullable`** — relevant for `oto`/`mto` to-one relations. When `true`, sending `null` for the field resolves to `disconnect` on update (`delete` instead for `oto` with `restriction: "set"` — an `oto` side can't just be "disconnected", the owned row is removed). When omitted/`false`, sending `null` for a to-one relation throws a `VSRepoAdapterError` (code `INVALID_DATA`) telling you the relation is not nullable.
-
-#### How each write method resolves relations
-
-| Method | Relations |
-| --- | --- |
-| `create` | `create`/`connectOrCreate` only (no upsert — there's nothing to update yet) |
-| `update` / `upsert` (`update` half) / `save` (upsert branch) | Full resolution: `create`/`connectOrCreate`/`upsert`/`disconnect`/`delete`/`deleteMany`/`set`, per `mode`/`restriction` |
-| `createMany` / `createManyReturning` / `updateMany` / `updateManyReturning` | Not supported — throws a `VSRepoAdapterError` naming the offending field if the payload contains a configured relation |
-
-### `relations` in method options (read)
-
-This is the `relations` you pass in the `options` of a `VSRepository` method (`get`, `find`, `findOne`, etc.). The shape is much simpler: an object where each relation field accepts:
-
-- `true` — load the relation as-is;
-- or another `relations` object — for nested eager loading (relations of the relation).
-
-```typescript
-const user = await userRepository.get(
-    { id: "..." },
-    {
-        relations: {
-            posts: true,                   // fetch posts along
-            author: { profile: true },     // and, inside author, its profile (nested eager loading)
-        },
-    }
-);
-```
-
-This object is turned into a Prisma `include` by the adapter (`parsePrismaInclude`). It does **not** use the constructor's `relations` config: it's purely a read-side option and works even with no `relations` in the config.
-
-The `select` and `relations` you pass in the options are turned into a Prisma `select` (`parsePrismaSelect`) and a Prisma `include` (`parsePrismaInclude`), respectively. When `select` is provided, the `include` derived from `relations` is discarded (`undefined`), because Prisma doesn't allow combining `include` and `select` in a single query. In other words, if you're already using `select`, the `relations` object becomes redundant — so it's optional. Here's the resolved logic (from `resolveReadArg`):
-
-```ts
-const prismaSelect = options.select && parsePrismaSelect(options.select);
-const prismaInclude = prismaSelect
-    ? undefined
-    : options.relations && parsePrismaInclude(options.relations);
-```
-
-## `merge`
-
-`merge(where, obj, options)` fetches the record matching `where` and returns it **deep-merged, in memory**, with `obj` — it does **not** write anything to the database. This mirrors how `merge` worked in the v1 of VSRepository: it's meant to build a full, merged entity that you then pass to `save`/`update` yourself, not to persist a partial update directly.
-
-For to-many relations (`otm`/`mtm`), items in the stored record and items in `obj` are matched by the configured `pk`: a match merges the two items, a new `pk` (or no `pk`) is appended. Nothing is ever removed by `merge`.
-
-## Atomic and aggregation methods
-
-The adapter implements the 8 abstract methods `VSRepository`'s `increment`/`decrement`/`multiply`/`divide`/`sum`/`average`/`min`/`max` delegate to: `incrementOne`, `decrementOne`, `multiplyOne`, `divideOne`, `sum`, `average`, `min`, `max`.
-
-- `incrementOne`/`decrementOne`/`multiplyOne`/`divideOne` translate directly into Prisma's native single-field atomic write — `data: { [field]: { increment: value } }` (and `decrement`/`multiply`/`divide`) — so the operation is evaluated **server-side** against the row's *current* value (`UPDATE ... SET field = field + value`), not as a fetch-then-save round trip on the client. Prisma's `update()` already returns the row reflecting the state *after* the write, so the adapter never issues a follow-up read.
-- `sum`/`average`/`min`/`max` translate into Prisma's `aggregate()` with `_sum`/`_avg`/`_min`/`_max: { [field]: true }`. The raw result (`number`, `bigint`, a `Decimal` instance, or `null`) is normalized to `number | null` — `null` is returned as-is (mirroring SQL's `SUM()`/`AVG()`/`MIN()`/`MAX()`, which return `NULL`, not `0`, over an empty set), and a `Decimal`/`DecimalLike` value is converted via its `.toNumber()`.
-
-```typescript
-// Atomic — evaluated server-side, no read-modify-write:
-await productRepository.increment(productId, "stock", 10);
-await accountRepository.decrement(accountId, "balance", 50);
-await productRepository.multiply(productId, "price", 1.1); // e.g. a 10% price bump
-await productRepository.divide(productId, "price", 2);
-
-// Aggregation — across every record matching an optional `where` (all if omitted):
-const total = await productRepository.sum("price"); // number | null
-const avgPrice = await productRepository.average("price", { active: true });
-const cheapest = await productRepository.min("price");
-const mostExpensive = await productRepository.max("price");
-```
-
-**Decimal fields** (`Prisma.Decimal`) are fully supported as the `field` for all 8 methods — `value` for the atomic methods is passed straight through to Prisma (which accepts a `number`, `string`, or `Decimal`/`DecimalJsLike`), and the aggregate methods always normalize the result to a `number`, never a `Decimal` instance.
-
-## `createMany`/`createManyReturning`/`updateMany`/`updateManyReturning` don't support nested writes
-
-`createMany`, `createManyReturning`, `updateMany` and `updateManyReturning` only accept scalar fields in their `data`. If your payload includes a field configured in `relations` (regardless of its value), the adapter throws a `VSRepoAdapterError` naming the offending field. For a full nested write, use `create`/`update`/`save` one record at a time, or wrap several `save` calls in a `saveMany`/`transaction`.
-
-> Note on return order: `createManyReturning` don't guarantee the returned records follow the order of the input payload (`objs`). Their result comes from a second `findMany` (re-querying the inserted/updated rows by primary key), so the order is only guaranteed when you pass `order` in the options.
-
-## Provider-specific limitations
-
-Some Prisma features this adapter relies on aren't available on every database provider. If you use one of these features on an unsupported provider, Prisma itself will throw a validation error (or, in future versions, the adapter may validate this upfront — see below).
-
-| Feature | Supported providers | Not supported |
-| --- | --- | --- |
-| `mode: "insensitive"` (used by `findByXIgnoreCase` dynamic methods) | PostgreSQL, MongoDB | MySQL, SQLite, SQL Server, CockroachDB — MySQL and SQL Server are case-insensitive by default, so no `mode` is needed there; SQLite is only case-insensitive for ASCII characters |
-| `createManyReturning` / `updateManyReturning` (built on Prisma's `createManyAndReturn`/`updateManyAndReturn`) | PostgreSQL, CockroachDB, SQLite | MySQL, SQL Server, MongoDB |
-| `skipDuplicates` on `createManyIgnoreConflicts` / `createManyReturningIgnoreConflicts` | PostgreSQL, MySQL, CockroachDB | MongoDB, SQL Server, SQLite |
-
-> These limitations come from Prisma itself, not from this adapter — see [Prisma's case sensitivity docs](https://www.prisma.io/docs/orm/v7/reference/prisma-client-reference#mode) and [CRUD reference](https://www.prisma.io/docs/orm/v7/prisma-client/queries/crud) for details.
-
-## Transactions
-
-**Every** method accepts `options.db` and runs its operation on the client/transaction you pass — the difference is in **how** each one treats it:
-
-- Most methods (single, one-call Prisma operations) simply run directly on `options?.db`: hand them a transaction client and the call participates in that transaction, starting nothing new.
-- `saveMany`, `updateManyReturning`, `createManyReturning` and `deleteManyReturning` need to run **more than one** Prisma operation atomically (`saveMany` saves each record individually; `updateManyReturning`/`createManyReturning` do an `updateManyAndReturn`/`createManyAndReturn` + `findMany`; `deleteManyReturning` does a `findMany` + `deleteMany`), so they go through `runTransactional`. If `options.db` is already an active transaction client, it's reused — no nested transaction is started; otherwise, a new transaction is created (on `options.db` if provided, or on the root client otherwise).
-
-A transaction client is told apart from the root `PrismaClient` by the `$on` method: Prisma's root client exposes it (for event listeners), the interactive transaction client doesn't. This is what `Prisma7ClientLike`/`Prisma7OrmTypes` encode in their types.
-
-```typescript
-await userRepository.transaction(async tx => {
-    // Every repository call made with `{ db: tx }` inside this callback
-    // shares the same transaction — including calls to `saveMany`/
-    // `updateManyReturning`/`createManyReturning`/`deleteManyReturning`, which
-    // will detect `tx` is already a transaction and run directly on it instead
-    // of nesting a new one.
-    await userRepository.save(user, { db: tx });
-    await userRepository.saveList(otherUsers, { db: tx });
-});
-```
-
-### Concurrency in `deleteManyReturning`
-
-`deleteManyReturning` runs a `findMany` on the given `where` (to capture the records it will return) and then **re-applies the same `where`** to a `deleteMany`. Prisma has no native `deleteManyAndReturn`, which is why the delete is driven by the `where` instead of by the records fetched in the `findMany`.
-
-Because of this two-step shape, a concurrent change between the `findMany` and the `deleteMany` can make them diverge:
-
-- a row **inserted after** the `findMany` that matches the `where` will still be deleted, even though it wasn't returned;
-- a row that **stops matching** the `where` before the `deleteMany` runs won't be deleted, even though it was returned.
-
-In other words, the returned records and the rows actually deleted are not guaranteed to be identical under concurrency.
-
-If you need to guarantee there are no concurrency issues, run this method inside a `repository.transaction()` at a higher isolation level — e.g. `SERIALIZABLE`:
-
-```typescript
-import { VSRepository, TransactionIsolationLevel } from "vsrepo";
-
-await userRepository.transaction(async tx => {
-    // Atomic: no concurrent insert/update can slip between the findMany
-    // and the deleteMany, since SERIALIZABLE isolates this transaction.
-    // `deleteManyReturning` is reached through the dynamic method you mapped
-    // to the adapter (e.g. a `@DynamicMethod()` exposing `deleteManyReturning`),
-    // always passing `{ db: tx }` so it runs inside this transaction.
-    const deleted = await userRepository.deleteManyReturningByIdIn([...], { db: tx });
-}, {
-    isolationLevel: TransactionIsolationLevel.SERIALIZABLE,
-});
-```
-
-> The isolation level applies only when the repository call actually runs **inside** that transaction (i.e. with `{ db: tx }`). When `deleteManyReturning` starts its own internal transaction (no `options.db` passed), it falls back to the default isolation level.
-
-## Logging
-
-The adapter uses `VSLogger` (from `vsrepo`) internally: every method logs a `DEBUG` line with the resolved Prisma arg, and start/end performance logs (surfacing a `WARN` for slow operations). Set `logLevel` in the constructor config to control verbosity; it defaults to `VSLogLevel.WARN`.
-
-## Requirements
-
-- `vsrepo` ^2.7.2
-- `@prisma/client` ^7.10.0
+<div align="center">
+  <img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/ddbfifdxd/image/upload/w_200,q_auto,f_auto/v1786386427/VS_logo_TextoAbaixo_yev4tq.png" alt="VSRepository Logo" width="200"/>
+
+  <p style="margin-top: 12px;">
+    <img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter?style=flat-square" alt="npm version"/>
+    <img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/l/@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter?style=flat-square" alt="npm license"/>
+    <img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/dt/@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter?style=flat-square" alt="npm downloads"/>
+    <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/inspired%20by-JpaRepository-E73121?style=flat-square" alt="inspired by JpaRepository"/>
+  </p>
+</div>
+
+# VSRepoPrisma7Adapter
+
+🇧🇷 [Ler em português](./README.pt-BR.md)
+
+> 🚧 **In development.** This is the `v2` of `@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter`, targeting [VSRepository v3](https://github.com/VSRepository/VSRepository). It's a development version, not a stable release yet, so its API may still change. For VSRepository v2, use the 1.x line (latest: `1.3.2`). It's currently the only officially supported adapter — adapters for other ORMs are planned but not published yet (see [Adapter status](https://github.com/VSRepository/VSRepository#adapter-status) in the VSRepository README).
+
+`VSRepoAdapter` implementation for [VSRepository v3](https://github.com/VSRepository/VSRepository) backed by [Prisma 7](https://www.prisma.io/). It translates every `VSRepository` operation into Prisma Client calls, resolving `VSRepoWhere`, `Ordering`, `select`/`relations` through dedicated parsers, and — when a `relations` config is provided — resolving relation fields on `create`/`update`/`upsert`/`save`.
+
+---
+
+## Table of contents
+
+- [Installation](#installation)
+- [Basic usage](#basic-usage)
+- [Constructor config](#constructor-config)
+- [Relations](#relations)
+  - [The two `relations`](#the-two-relations)
+  - [`relations` in the constructor (write)](#relations-in-the-constructor-write)
+    - [`mode`](#mode)
+    - [`restriction`](#restriction)
+    - [`pk` and `nullable`](#pk-and-nullable)
+    - [How each write method resolves relations](#how-each-write-method-resolves-relations)
+  - [`relations` in method options (read)](#relations-in-method-options-read)
+- [Atomic and aggregation methods](#atomic-and-aggregation-methods)
+- [`createMany`/`createManyReturning`/`updateMany`/`updateManyReturning` don't support nested writes](#createmanycreatemanyreturningupdatemanyupdatemanyreturning-dont-support-nested-writes)
+- [Provider-specific limitations](#provider-specific-limitations)
+- [Transactions](#transactions)
+- [Logging](#logging)
+- [Requirements](#requirements)
+
+---
+
+## Installation
+
+```bash
+npm install vsrepo@dev @prisma/client @vsrepo/prisma7-adapter@dev
+```
+
+While `2.0.0` is in development, install both `vsrepo` and `@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter` with the `dev` tag.
+
+## Basic usage
+
+```typescript
+import { VSRepository, VSLogLevel } from "vsrepo";
+import { Prisma7Adapter, Prisma7OrmTypes } from "@vsrepo/prisma7-adapter";
+import { Prisma, PrismaClient } from "./generated/prisma/client";
+import { prisma } from "./prisma";
+
+type User = Prisma.UserGetPayload<{ include: { posts: true } }>;
+type MyOrmTypes = Prisma7OrmTypes<PrismaClient>;
+
+class UserRepository extends VSRepository<User, string, MyOrmTypes> {
+    constructor() {
+        super({
+            adapter: new Prisma7Adapter(prisma, {
+                modelName: "user",
+                pkName: "id",
+                relations: {
+                    posts: { mode: "otm", restriction: "add", pk: "id" },
+                },
+                logLevel: VSLogLevel.WARN,
+            }),
+        });
+    }
+}
+
+const userRepository = new UserRepository();
+
+const user = await userRepository.get("...", { relations: { posts: true } }); // by primary key
+```
+
+Here the `relations` you pass in the method `options` — shaped like `{ field: true }` — is transformed into a Prisma `include` by the adapter (see [`relations` in method options (read)](#relations-in-method-options-read)). If you supply `select`, the `relations`/`include` is ignored. Don't confuse it with the constructor-config `relations`, which describes how relation fields are resolved in write payloads — the difference is explained in [The two `relations`](#the-two-relations).
+
+`Prisma7OrmTypes<DB>` ties `VSRepository`'s `getDbClient()`/`transaction()` return types to your real, generated Prisma types — see [Transactions](#transactions).
+
+## Constructor config
+
+```typescript
+new Prisma7Adapter(prisma, {
+    modelName: "user", // required — the Prisma Client model/delegate name, as in `prisma.user`
+    pkName: "id",       // required — the entity's primary key field name
+    relations: { ... }, // optional — see "relations in the constructor (write)" below
+    provider: "postgresql", // optional — detected from the Prisma Client when omitted
+    logLevel: VSLogLevel.WARN, // optional — default: VSLogLevel.WARN
+});
+```
+
+At construction, the adapter checks the Prisma Client and the model, and resolves the datasource provider:
+
+- a `null`/`undefined` client throws a `VSRepoAdapterError` (code `MISSING_DB_CLIENT`);
+- a `modelName` with no matching delegate on the client (`prisma.<modelName>`) throws `MODEL_NOT_FOUND`;
+- the provider comes from `provider` when set; otherwise it's detected from the generated client (`_engineConfig.activeProvider`, falling back to the driver adapter's `provider`). If it can't be detected, construction throws `NOT_SUPPORTED` — set `provider` explicitly in that case (one of `postgresql`, `cockroachdb`, `mysql`, `sqlite`, `sqlserver`).
+
+The other fields (`pkName`, `relations`, `logLevel`) are checked by TypeScript only, not at runtime.
+
+## Relations
+
+### The two `relations`
+
+The name `relations` appears in **two different places** in the API, with **different shapes and purposes** — easy to confuse. In a nutshell:
+
+| | `relations` in the **constructor** | `relations` in **method options** |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| Where you define it | `new Prisma7Adapter(prisma, { relations: ... })` | `repository.get(where, { relations: ... })` — and other methods |
+| Shape | One **config object** per field: `{ mode, restriction, pk, nullable? }` | One **`true`/sub-object** per field: `{ posts: true }` |
+| Purpose | **Write** — when a `create`/`update`/`upsert`/`save` payload contains a relation field, tells the adapter how to turn it into a Prisma nested write (`create`/`connectOrCreate`/`upsert`/`disconnect`/`deleteMany`/`set`) | **Read** — eager loading: which relations to fetch alongside the result (becomes a Prisma `include`) |
+| Consumed by | `parsePrismaWriteData` (write resolver) | `parsePrismaInclude` (via `resolveReadArg`) |
+| Depends on the other? | No — it only affects writes | No — it works even with no `relations` in the constructor |
+
+Neither depends on the other: the method-options `relations` does eager loading even when the constructor has no `relations`, and the constructor `relations` governs write behavior even if you never pass `relations` in options. The two subsections below cover each one.
+
+### `relations` in the constructor (write)
+
+The `relations` config on the constructor describes, for each relation field of your entity, **how the adapter should resolve that field when it shows up in write payloads** (`create`/`update`/`upsert`/`save`).
+
+Each relation is configured by its field name:
+
+```typescript
+relations: {
+    posts: { mode: "otm", restriction: "add", pk: "id" },
+    address: { mode: "oto", restriction: "set", pk: "id" },
+    author: { mode: "mto", restriction: "set", pk: "id", nullable: true },
+}
+```
+
+Without `relations`, every field — including relation fields — is passed straight through to Prisma's `where`/`data`/`create`/`update`, as-is. That's fine for scalar fields, but Prisma expects a very specific nested-write shape (`create`/`connectOrCreate`/`upsert`/`disconnect`/`deleteMany`/`set`) for relation fields, so if your entity has relations you'll usually want to configure them.
+
+#### `mode`
+
+Cardinality of the relation, from the point of view of the entity that owns the field:
+
+| `mode` | Meaning | Field shape you send |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| `oto` | one-to-one | a single object, or `null` |
+| `mto` | many-to-one | a single object, or `null` |
+| `otm` | one-to-many | an array of objects |
+| `mtm` | many-to-many | an array of objects |
+
+#### `restriction`
+
+Controls how `save`/`update`/`upsert` handle relation items that already exist (matched by `pk`) and, for to-many relations, items that were **not** included in the payload:
+
+- **`"add"`** — only creates/connects/upserts the items you send. Existing items that aren't in the payload are left untouched.
+- **`"set"`** — same as `"add"`, but also removes what wasn't sent: for `otm` it runs a `deleteMany` on the items missing from the array; for `mtm` it resets the join (`set: []`) before reconnecting; for `oto`/`mto` with `nullable: true`, sending `null` deletes/disconnects the relation (see below).
+
+#### `pk` and `nullable`
+
+- **`pk`** — the field used to identify an existing related record. An item **with** `pk` in the payload becomes a `connectOrCreate`/`upsert`; an item **without** it becomes a plain `create`.
+- **`nullable`** — relevant for `oto`/`mto` to-one relations. When `true`, sending `null` for the field resolves to `disconnect` on update (`delete` instead for `oto` with `restriction: "set"` — an `oto` side can't just be "disconnected", the owned row is removed). When omitted/`false`, sending `null` for a to-one relation throws a `VSRepoAdapterError` (code `INVALID_DATA`) telling you the relation is not nullable.
+
+#### How each write method resolves relations
+
+| Method | Relations |
+| --- | --- |
+| `create` | `create`/`connectOrCreate` only (no upsert — there's nothing to update yet) |
+| `update` / `upsert` (`update` half) / `save` (upsert branch) | Full resolution: `create`/`connectOrCreate`/`upsert`/`disconnect`/`delete`/`deleteMany`/`set`, per `mode`/`restriction` |
+| `createMany` / `createManyReturning` / `updateMany` / `updateManyReturning` | Not supported — throws a `VSRepoAdapterError` naming the offending field if the payload contains a configured relation |
+
+### `relations` in method options (read)
+
+This is the `relations` you pass in the `options` of a `VSRepository` method (`get`, `find`, `findOne`, etc.). The shape is much simpler: an object where each relation field accepts:
+
+- `true` — load the relation as-is;
+- or another `relations` object — for nested eager loading (relations of the relation).
+
+```typescript
+const user = await userRepository.get(
+    "...", // primary key
+    {
+        relations: {
+            posts: true,                   // fetch posts along
+            author: { profile: true },     // and, inside author, its profile (nested eager loading)
+        },
+    }
+);
+```
+
+This object is turned into a Prisma `include` by the adapter (`parsePrismaInclude`). It does **not** use the constructor's `relations` config: it's purely a read-side option and works even with no `relations` in the config.
+
+The `select` and `relations` you pass in the options are turned into a Prisma `select` (`parsePrismaSelect`) and a Prisma `include` (`parsePrismaInclude`), respectively. When `select` is provided, the `include` derived from `relations` is discarded (`undefined`), because Prisma doesn't allow combining `include` and `select` in a single query. In other words, if you're already using `select`, the `relations` object becomes redundant — so it's optional. Here's the resolved logic (from `resolveReadArg`):
+
+```ts
+const prismaSelect = options.select && parsePrismaSelect(options.select);
+const prismaInclude = prismaSelect
+    ? undefined
+    : options.relations && parsePrismaInclude(options.relations);
+```
+
+## Atomic and aggregation methods
+
+The adapter implements the 12 abstract methods `VSRepository`'s `increment`/`decrement`/`multiply`/`divide`, their `*Many` counterparts, and `sum`/`average`/`min`/`max` delegate to: `incrementOne`, `decrementOne`, `multiplyOne`, `divideOne`, `incrementMany`, `decrementMany`, `multiplyMany`, `divideMany`, `sum`, `average`, `min`, `max`.
+
+- `incrementOne`/`decrementOne`/`multiplyOne`/`divideOne` translate directly into Prisma's native single-field atomic write — `data: { [field]: { increment: value } }` (and `decrement`/`multiply`/`divide`) — so the operation is evaluated **server-side** against the row's *current* value (`UPDATE ... SET field = field + value`), not as a fetch-then-save round trip on the client. Prisma's `update()` already returns the row reflecting the state *after* the write, so the adapter never issues a follow-up read.
+- `incrementMany`/`decrementMany`/`multiplyMany`/`divideMany` apply that same native write to **every** record matching `where`, through Prisma's `updateMany`, also evaluated server-side. They return a `{ count }` (`CountResult`) instead of the records.
+- `sum`/`average`/`min`/`max` translate into Prisma's `aggregate()` with `_sum`/`_avg`/`_min`/`_max: { [field]: true }`. The raw result (`number`, `bigint`, a `Decimal` instance, or `null`) is normalized to `number | null` — `null` is returned as-is (mirroring SQL's `SUM()`/`AVG()`/`MIN()`/`MAX()`, which return `NULL`, not `0`, over an empty set), and a `Decimal`/`DecimalLike` value is converted via its `.toNumber()`.
+
+```typescript
+// Atomic — evaluated server-side, no read-modify-write:
+await productRepository.increment("stock", 10, { id: productId });
+await accountRepository.decrement("balance", 50, { id: accountId });
+await productRepository.multiply("price", 1.1, { id: productId }); // e.g. a 10% price bump
+await productRepository.divide("price", 2, { id: productId });
+
+// Same, for every record matching `where` — returns `{ count }`:
+await productRepository.incrementMany("stock", 10, { category: "books" });
+
+// Aggregation — across every record matching an optional `where` (all if omitted):
+const total = await productRepository.sum("price"); // number | null
+const avgPrice = await productRepository.average("price", { active: true });
+const cheapest = await productRepository.min("price");
+const mostExpensive = await productRepository.max("price");
+```
+
+**Decimal fields** (`Prisma.Decimal`) are fully supported as the `field` for all of these methods — `value` for the atomic methods is passed straight through to Prisma (which accepts a `number`, `string`, or `Decimal`/`DecimalJsLike`), and the aggregate methods always normalize the result to a `number`, never a `Decimal` instance.
+
+## `createMany`/`createManyReturning`/`updateMany`/`updateManyReturning` don't support nested writes
+
+`createMany`, `createManyReturning`, `updateMany` and `updateManyReturning` only accept scalar fields in their `data`. If your payload includes a field configured in `relations` (regardless of its value), the adapter throws a `VSRepoAdapterError` naming the offending field. For a full nested write, use `create`/`update`/`save` one record at a time, or wrap several `save` calls in a `saveMany`/`transaction`.
+
+> Note on return order: `createManyReturning` and `updateManyReturning` don't guarantee the returned records follow the order of the input payload (`objs`). Without `select`/`relations` they are a single `createManyAndReturn`/`updateManyAndReturn` call; with them, the result comes from a second `findMany` (re-querying the inserted/updated rows by primary key, inside a transaction). Either way, don't rely on the order matching the input.
+
+## Provider-specific limitations
+
+Some features this adapter relies on aren't available on every database provider. The adapter checks every feature below upfront and throws a `VSRepoAdapterError` (code `NOT_SUPPORTED`) before touching the database.
+
+| Feature | Supported providers | Not supported |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| `ignoreCase` (translated to Prisma's `mode: "insensitive"`; used by `findByXIgnoreCase` dynamic methods) | PostgreSQL, CockroachDB | MySQL, SQLite, SQL Server — MySQL and SQL Server are case-insensitive by default (depending on the collation), so no `mode` is needed there; SQLite is only case-insensitive for ASCII characters |
+| `createManyReturning` / `updateManyReturning` (built on Prisma's `createManyAndReturn`/`updateManyAndReturn`) | PostgreSQL, CockroachDB, SQLite | MySQL, SQL Server |
+| `ignoreConflicts: true` on `createMany` / `createManyReturning` (Prisma's `skipDuplicates`) | PostgreSQL, MySQL, CockroachDB | SQL Server, SQLite |
+
+The `like` operator isn't supported on any provider — Prisma has no equivalent, so the adapter throws `NOT_SUPPORTED`. Use `contains`, `startsWith` or `endsWith` instead.
+
+> These limitations come from Prisma itself, not from this adapter — see [Prisma's case sensitivity docs](https://www.prisma.io/docs/orm/v7/reference/prisma-client-reference#mode) and [CRUD reference](https://www.prisma.io/docs/orm/v7/prisma-client/queries/crud) for details. The adapter is covered by integration tests on PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, SQL Server and CockroachDB.
+
+## Transactions
+
+**Every** method accepts `options.db` and runs its operation on the client/transaction you pass — the difference is in **how** each one treats it:
+
+- Most methods (single, one-call Prisma operations) simply run directly on `options?.db`: hand them a transaction client and the call participates in that transaction, starting nothing new.
+- `saveMany` and `deleteManyReturning` — and `updateManyReturning`/`createManyReturning` when you pass `select` or `relations` — need to run **more than one** Prisma operation atomically (`saveMany` saves each record individually; `updateManyReturning`/`createManyReturning` do an `updateManyAndReturn`/`createManyAndReturn` + `findMany`; `deleteManyReturning` does a `findMany` + `deleteMany`), so they go through `runTransactional`. Without `select`/`relations`, `updateManyReturning`/`createManyReturning` are a single Prisma call. If `options.db` is already an active transaction client, it's reused — no nested transaction is started; otherwise, a new transaction is created (on `options.db` if provided, or on the root client otherwise).
+
+A transaction client is told apart from the root `PrismaClient` by the `$on` method: Prisma's root client exposes it (for event listeners), the interactive transaction client doesn't. This is what `Prisma7ClientLike`/`Prisma7OrmTypes` encode in their types.
+
+```typescript
+await userRepository.transaction(async tx => {
+    // Every repository call made with `{ db: tx }` inside this callback
+    // shares the same transaction — including calls to `saveMany`/
+    // `updateManyReturning`/`createManyReturning`/`deleteManyReturning`, which
+    // will detect `tx` is already a transaction and run directly on it instead
+    // of nesting a new one.
+    await userRepository.save(user, { db: tx });
+    await userRepository.save(otherUsers, { db: tx }); // an array saves several records
+});
+```
+
+### Concurrency in `deleteManyReturning`
+
+`deleteManyReturning` runs a `findMany` on the given `where` (to capture the records it will return) and then deletes **those same records by primary key** with a `deleteMany`, all inside one transaction. Prisma has no native `deleteManyAndReturn`, which is why it takes these two steps. If your `select` leaves the primary key out, the adapter adds it to the query internally and strips it from the returned records.
+
+Since the delete is driven by the primary keys that were actually fetched, a row **inserted after** the `findMany` is never deleted by mistake. A concurrent change between the two steps can still make them diverge, though:
+
+- a returned row that was **deleted by someone else** in the meantime is still returned, even though this call didn't delete it;
+- a returned row that **stops matching** the `where` before the `deleteMany` runs is still deleted, since the `where` isn't re-applied.
+
+If you need to guarantee there are no concurrency issues, run this method inside a `repository.transaction()` at a higher isolation level — e.g. `SERIALIZABLE`:
+
+```typescript
+import { VSRepoIsolationLevel } from "vsrepo";
+
+await userRepository.transaction(async tx => {
+    // Atomic: no concurrent insert/update can slip between the findMany
+    // and the deleteMany, since SERIALIZABLE isolates this transaction.
+    // Always pass `{ db: tx }` so the call runs inside this transaction.
+    const deleted = await userRepository.deleteManyReturning({ id: { in: [...] } }, { db: tx });
+}, {
+    isolationLevel: VSRepoIsolationLevel.SERIALIZABLE,
+});
+```
+
+> The isolation level applies only when the repository call actually runs **inside** that transaction (i.e. with `{ db: tx }`). When `deleteManyReturning` starts its own internal transaction (no `options.db` passed), it falls back to the default isolation level.
+
+## Logging
+
+The adapter uses `VSLogger` (from `vsrepo`) internally: every method logs a `DEBUG` line with the resolved Prisma arg, and start/end performance logs. Set `logLevel` in the constructor config to control verbosity; it defaults to `VSLogLevel.WARN`.
+
+## Requirements
+
+- `vsrepo` ^3.0.0-dev.2
+- `@prisma/client` ^7.10.0
+- Node.js `>=22`
+- A PostgreSQL, CockroachDB, MySQL, SQLite or SQL Server database (all covered by the integration tests)