@vpxa/aikit 0.1.375 → 0.1.376

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
1
- import{AGENTS as e}from"../definitions/agents.mjs";import{AGENT_BODIES as t}from"../definitions/bodies.mjs";import{HOOKS as n}from"../definitions/hooks.mjs";import{SERVER_NAME as r}from"../definitions/mcp.mjs";import{getPlatformPrimaryModelMap as i}from"../definitions/models.mjs";import{PLATFORM_HOOK_CAPABILITIES as a}from"../definitions/platform-capabilities.mjs";import{PROMPTS as o}from"../definitions/prompts.mjs";import{AIKIT_INSTALL_HINT_SECTION as s,PLATFORM_OUTPUT_RULES_SECTION as c,PROTOCOLS as l}from"../definitions/protocols.mjs";import{AIKIT_TOOLS as u,CLAUDE_CODE_TOOL_MAP as d,IDE_CAPABILITIES as f}from"../definitions/tools.mjs";import{buildAgentTable as p,buildCompactAgentTable as m,buildFlowSection as h,buildHooksSection as g,buildSkillsSection as _,injectOrchestratorDirective as v,lowerFirst as y}from"./_shared.mjs";const b=h({flowTool:`flow`,isLifecycleOwner:!0}),x=h({flowTool:`flow`,isLifecycleOwner:!0}),S=h({flowTool:`flow`,isLifecycleOwner:!1});function C(e){return e.replace(/([a-z0-9])([A-Z])/g,`$1-$2`).replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]+/g,`-`).replace(/^-+|-+$/g,``).toLowerCase()}function w(e){return`"${String(e).replace(/\\/g,`\\\\`).replace(/"/g,`\\"`)}"`}function T(e){let t=(f[e]||[]).flatMap(e=>d[e]||[]),n=u.map(e=>`mcp__${r.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]/g,``)}__${e}`);return[...new Set([...t,...n])].sort((e,t)=>e.localeCompare(t))}function E(e,t){let n=[];return n.push(`# ${r} ${e}`),n.push(``),t.description&&(n.push(`> ${t.description}`),n.push(``)),n.push(t.content.trim()),n.push(``),n.join(`
2
- `)}function D(e,n){let r=t[e];return typeof r==`function`?r(n):r||``}function O(e){let t=[];e.extraBody&&t.push(e.extraBody),e.sharedBase&&l[e.sharedBase]&&t.push(l[e.sharedBase]);for(let n of e.sharedProtocols||[])l[n]&&t.push(l[n]);return t}function k(){let t=[];for(let[n,r]of Object.entries(e)){if(r.variants){for(let[e,i]of Object.entries(r.variants))t.push({name:`${n}-${e}`,description:i.description||r.description});continue}t.push({name:n,description:r.description})}return t}function A(e){return k().map(({name:t,description:n})=>`- \`${e}/${t}.md\` — ${n}`).join(`
3
- `)}function j(t=p(e,i(`claude-code`))){return[`# ${r} — Claude Code Agents`,``,c,``,s,``,`## MCP Server`,``,`Server name: \`${r}\``,"Configured in `.mcp.json` (project) and `~/.claude.json` (user-global — `claude mcp add --scope user` format).","Default agent: `Orchestrator` in `~/.claude/settings.json` — every conversation starts as Orchestrator automatically.",``,`## Agents`,``,t,``,`## Agent Files`,``,A(`.claude/agents`),``,`## Commands`,``,"Slash commands live under `.claude/commands/`.",``,`## Session Protocol`,``,g(n,a[`claude-code`]),``].join(`
4
- `)}function M(){return v([`# ${r} — Claude Code Instructions`,``,"Detailed workspace instructions live in `AGENTS.md`.","Full sub-agent instructions live in `.claude/agents/`.","Slash commands live in `.claude/commands/`.","MCP server config lives in `.mcp.json` (project) and `~/.claude.json` (user-global — written by `claude mcp add --scope user`).","Default agent set to `Orchestrator` in `~/.claude/settings.json` — every conversation starts as Orchestrator, no `/agent` command needed.",``,"Start with `AGENTS.md`, then open the specific sub-agent file you want to use.",``,c,``,s,``]).join(`
5
- `)}function N(e,t,n,i,a){let o=T(t.toolRole),s=O(t),c=_(t.skills),l=e===`Orchestrator`?[b,x]:[S],u=[n,...s,t.bodyAddendum,c,...l].filter(Boolean).join(`
1
+ import{AGENTS as e}from"../definitions/agents.mjs";import{AGENT_BODIES as t}from"../definitions/bodies.mjs";import{HOOKS as n}from"../definitions/hooks.mjs";import{SERVER_NAME as r}from"../definitions/mcp.mjs";import{getPlatformPrimaryModelMap as i}from"../definitions/models.mjs";import{PLATFORM_HOOK_CAPABILITIES as a}from"../definitions/platform-capabilities.mjs";import{PROMPTS as o}from"../definitions/prompts.mjs";import{AIKIT_INSTALL_HINT_SECTION as s,PLATFORM_OUTPUT_RULES_SECTION as c,PROTOCOLS as l}from"../definitions/protocols.mjs";import{CLAUDE_CODE_TOOL_MAP as u,IDE_CAPABILITIES as d}from"../definitions/tools.mjs";import{buildAgentTable as f,buildCompactAgentTable as p,buildFlowSection as m,buildHooksSection as h,buildSkillsSection as g,injectOrchestratorDirective as _,lowerFirst as v}from"./_shared.mjs";const y=m({flowTool:`flow`,isLifecycleOwner:!0}),b=m({flowTool:`flow`,isLifecycleOwner:!1});function x(e){return e.replace(/([a-z0-9])([A-Z])/g,`$1-$2`).replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]+/g,`-`).replace(/^-+|-+$/g,``).toLowerCase()}function S(e){return`"${String(e).replace(/\\/g,`\\\\`).replace(/"/g,`\\"`)}"`}function C(e){let t=(d[e]||[]).flatMap(e=>u[e]||[]);return[...new Set([...t])].sort((e,t)=>e.localeCompare(t))}function w(e,t){let n=[];return n.push(`# ${r} ${e}`),n.push(``),t.description&&(n.push(`> ${t.description}`),n.push(``)),n.push(t.content.trim()),n.push(``),n.join(`
2
+ `)}function T(e,n){let r=t[e];return typeof r==`function`?r(n):r||``}function E(e){let t=[];e.extraBody&&t.push(e.extraBody),e.sharedBase&&l[e.sharedBase]&&t.push(l[e.sharedBase]);for(let n of e.sharedProtocols||[])l[n]&&t.push(l[n]);return t}function D(){let t=[];for(let[n,r]of Object.entries(e)){if(r.variants){for(let[e,i]of Object.entries(r.variants))t.push({name:`${n}-${e}`,description:i.description||r.description});continue}t.push({name:n,description:r.description})}return t}function O(e){return D().map(({name:t,description:n})=>`- \`${e}/${t}.md\` — ${n}`).join(`
3
+ `)}function k(t=f(e,i(`claude-code`))){return[`# ${r} — Claude Code Agents`,``,c,``,s,``,`## MCP Server`,``,`Server name: \`${r}\``,"Configured in `.mcp.json` (project) and `~/.claude.json` (user-global — `claude mcp add --scope user` format).","Default agent: `Orchestrator` in `~/.claude/settings.json` — every conversation starts as Orchestrator automatically.",``,`## Agents`,``,t,``,`## Agent Files`,``,O(`.claude/agents`),``,`## Commands`,``,"Slash commands live under `.claude/commands/`.",``,`## Session Protocol`,``,h(n,a[`claude-code`]),``].join(`
4
+ `)}function A(){return _([`# ${r} — Claude Code Instructions`,``,"Detailed workspace instructions live in `AGENTS.md`.","Full sub-agent instructions live in `.claude/agents/`.","Slash commands live in `.claude/commands/`.","MCP server config lives in `.mcp.json` (project) and `~/.claude.json` (user-global — written by `claude mcp add --scope user`).","Default agent set to `Orchestrator` in `~/.claude/settings.json` — every conversation starts as Orchestrator, no `/agent` command needed.",``,"Start with `AGENTS.md`, then open the specific sub-agent file you want to use.",``,c,``,s,``]).join(`
5
+ `)}function j(e,t,n,i,a){let o=C(t.toolRole),s=E(t),c=g(t.skills),l=e===`Orchestrator`?[y]:[b],u=[n,...s,t.bodyAddendum,c,...l].filter(Boolean).join(`
6
6
 
7
- `).trim(),d=t.identity?`You are the **${e}**${t.identity}`:`You are the **${e}**, ${y(t.description)}.`,f=a?.[e],p=o.length>0?`tools: [${o.join(`, `)}]`:null,m=t.skills?.length>0?`skills: [${t.skills.map(([e])=>e).join(`, `)}]`:null,h=[`---`,`name: ${C(e)}`,`description: ${w(t.description)}`,...f?[`model: ${w(f)}`]:[],...p?[p]:[],`mcpServers:`,` - ${r}`,...m?[m]:[],`---`,``,`# ${e} - ${t.title||e}`,``,d];return u&&h.push(``,u),h.push(``),h.join(`
8
- `)}function P(){let t=[],n=i(`claude-code`),r=p(e,n),a=m(e);t.push({path:`CLAUDE.md`,content:M()}),t.push({path:`AGENTS.md`,content:j(r)});for(let[e,n]of Object.entries(o))t.push({path:`.claude/commands/aikit-${e}.md`,content:E(e,n)});for(let[i,o]of Object.entries(e)){let e=D(i,a);if(o.variants){for(let[a,s]of Object.entries(o.variants)){let c=`${i}-${a}`;t.push({path:`.claude/agents/${c}.md`,content:N(c,{...o,description:s.description||o.description,identity:s.identity,bodyAddendum:s.bodyAddendum},e,r,n)})}continue}t.push({path:`.claude/agents/${i}.md`,content:N(i,o,e,r,n)})}return t}export{b as CLAUDE_FLOWS_SECTION,x as CLAUDE_ORCHESTRATOR_FLOW_ROUTING_SECTION,P as generateClaudeCode};
7
+ `).trim(),d=t.identity?`You are the **${e}**${t.identity}`:`You are the **${e}**, ${v(t.description)}.`,f=a?.[e],p=o.length>0?`tools: [${o.join(`, `)}]`:null,m=t.skills?.length>0?`skills: [${t.skills.map(([e])=>e).join(`, `)}]`:null,h=[`---`,`name: ${x(e)}`,`description: ${S(t.description)}`,...f?[`model: ${S(f)}`]:[],...p?[p]:[],`mcpServers:`,` - ${r}`,...m?[m]:[],`---`,``,`# ${e} - ${t.title||e}`,``,d];return u&&h.push(``,u),h.push(``),h.join(`
8
+ `)}function M(){let t=[],n=i(`claude-code`),r=f(e,n),a=p(e);t.push({path:`CLAUDE.md`,content:A()}),t.push({path:`AGENTS.md`,content:k(r)});for(let[e,n]of Object.entries(o))t.push({path:`.claude/commands/aikit-${e}.md`,content:w(e,n)});for(let[i,o]of Object.entries(e)){let e=T(i,a);if(o.variants){for(let[a,s]of Object.entries(o.variants)){let c=`${i}-${a}`;t.push({path:`.claude/agents/${c}.md`,content:j(c,{...o,description:s.description||o.description,identity:s.identity,bodyAddendum:s.bodyAddendum},e,r,n)})}continue}t.push({path:`.claude/agents/${i}.md`,content:j(i,o,e,r,n)})}return t}export{y as CLAUDE_FLOWS_SECTION,M as generateClaudeCode};
@@ -24,6 +24,6 @@ ${u}
24
24
  ${e(o)}
25
25
 
26
26
  ${s}
27
- ${c}`}}const i={Orchestrator:{title:`The Master Conductor`,description:`Master conductor that orchestrates the full development lifecycle: Planning → Implementation → Review → Recovery → Commit`,argumentHint:null,toolRole:`orchestrator`,sharedBase:null,sharedProtocols:[`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`orchestration`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit recall, flow status, search, and ctx ref reuse`],[`multi-agents-development`,`Before delegation — decomposition, dispatch envelope, review pipeline`],[`present`,`For plans, reviews, evidence maps, approvals, and non-tiny user output`],[`brainstorming`,`For design forks, trade-offs, or creative requirements`],[`requirements-clarity`,`For vague, large, or cross-team requirements before planning`],[`c4-architecture`,`For architecture diagrams, boundary questions, or structure docs`],[`adr-skill`,`For non-trivial technical decisions and ADR lifecycle`],[`docs`,`For docs-sync, durable docs, PRDs, tours, and architecture docs`],[`lesson-learned`,`After implementation/review work — persist reusable engineering lessons`],[`session-handoff`,`When context pressure rises or work must pause/resume`],[`repo-access`,`For private/self-hosted repo access failures`],[`browser-use`,`For browser auth, JS-rendered pages, visual verification, web automation`]],subagentConstraints:["Do NOT use the `present` tool — return all findings as structured text.","Do NOT call `get_changed_files` — it returns ALL uncommitted diffs (100K+ tokens). Use `git diff <file>` if needed.",`No flow advancement. Only Orchestrator advances the flow.`,"Return status: `DONE` | `DONE_WITH_CONCERNS` | `NEEDS_CONTEXT` | `BLOCKED`. ≤200 words for normal status; full detail only if BLOCKED.",`Stay inside assigned files and boundary. Do not modify files outside scope.`,"Respect `readonly: true|false` flag in dispatch envelope. When readonly=true, do NOT modify files. When readonly=false, follow normal file-modification scope."]},Planner:{title:`The Strategic Architect`,description:`Autonomous planner that researches codebases and writes comprehensive TDD implementation plans`,compactRole:`TDD implementation plans`,argumentHint:null,toolRole:`planner`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`planning-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`orchestration`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit reading plans, recall, and compressed context reuse`],[`multi-agents-development`,`For decomposition, dependency batches, and dispatch envelopes`],[`brainstorming`,`For new feature/behavior planning and design alternatives`],[`requirements-clarity`,`For vague or large requirements before planning`],[`present`,`For plan, dependency graph, risk matrix, and approval display`],[`c4-architecture`,`For architecture changes and C4 diagrams`],[`adr-skill`,`For non-trivial technical decisions and ADRs`],[`session-handoff`,`For context pressure or session end`],[`repo-access`,`For private or self-hosted repo access`],[`browser-use`,`For auth recovery or browser workflows`]]},Implementer:{title:`The Code Builder`,description:`Persistent implementation agent that writes code following TDD practices until all tasks are complete`,compactRole:`New features, wire up, build`,argumentHint:`Implementation task, feature, or phase from plan`,toolRole:`codeAgent`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`implementation`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`typescript`,`When writing TypeScript code — type patterns, generics, utility types`],[`react`,`When implementing React components, hooks, or pages`],[`lesson-learned`,`After completing non-obvious implementation work`]]},Frontend:{title:`The UI Specialist`,description:`UI/UX specialist for React, styling, responsive design, and frontend implementation`,compactRole:`UI/UX, React, styling, responsive`,argumentHint:`UI component, styling task, or frontend feature`,toolRole:`codeAgent`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`implementation`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`react`,`When building React components — hooks, patterns, Server Components`],[`typescript`,`When writing TypeScript code — type patterns, generics, utility types`],[`frontend-design`,`When implementing UI/UX — design systems, accessibility, responsive patterns`],[`browser-use`,`When visual/browser verification is needed`],[`lesson-learned`,`After completing non-obvious frontend implementation work`]]},Refactor:{title:`The Code Sculptor`,description:`Code refactoring specialist that improves structure, readability, and maintainability`,compactRole:`Cleanup, simplify, DRY, extract`,argumentHint:`Code, component, or pattern to refactor`,toolRole:`refactor`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`implementation`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`typescript`,`When refactoring TypeScript code — type patterns, generics, utility types`],[`lesson-learned`,`After completing refactor — extract principles from before/after diff`]]},Debugger:{title:`The Problem Solver`,description:`Expert debugger that diagnoses issues, traces errors, and provides solutions using AI Kit traces and compressed context before raw file reads`,compactRole:`Bug diagnosis, error tracing`,argumentHint:`Error message, stack trace, or description of issue`,toolRole:`debugger`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`diagnostics`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`typescript`,`When writing TypeScript code — type patterns, generics, utility types`],[`browser-use`,`For browser/UI reproduction loops and JS-rendered failures`],[`repo-access`,`When debugging depends on private or enterprise repo access`],[`lesson-learned`,`After a non-obvious root cause or fix`]]},Security:{title:`The Vulnerability Hunter`,description:`Security specialist that analyzes code for vulnerabilities and compliance`,compactRole:`Vulnerability analysis, auth hardening`,argumentHint:`Code, feature, or component to security review`,toolRole:`security`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`diagnostics`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`typescript`,`When reviewing code — security patterns, type safety`],[`repo-access`,`When security review requires private/enterprise repo access`],[`browser-use`,`When reviewing browser auth, sessions, cookies, or web security flows`]]},Documenter:{title:`The Knowledge Keeper`,description:`Documentation specialist that creates and maintains comprehensive project documentation`,compactRole:`Project documentation`,argumentHint:`Component, API, feature, or area to document`,toolRole:`documenter`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`documentation-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`documentation`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`docs`,`When creating or updating project documentation — docs/ convention, architecture blueprints, Diátaxis framework`],[`present`,`When presenting documentation previews or architecture visuals to the user`],[`c4-architecture`,`When documenting architecture, containers, components, or deployment`],[`adr-skill`,`When docs involve technical decisions or ADR updates`],[`typescript`,`When documenting TypeScript APIs, public types, or generated docs`],[`session-handoff`,`When docs work spans sessions or context pressure rises`]]},Explorer:{title:`The Rapid Scout`,description:`Rapid codebase exploration to find files, usages, dependencies, and structural context`,compactRole:`Rapid codebase navigation`,argumentHint:`Find files, usages, and context related to: {topic or goal}`,toolRole:`explorer`,sharedBase:null,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`exploration`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`]]},Researcher:{title:`The Context Gatherer`,description:`Deep analysis, architecture review, and multi-model decision protocol participant`,compactRole:`Multi-model deep research`,argumentHint:`Research question, problem statement, or subsystem to investigate`,toolRole:`researcher`,sharedBase:`researcher-base`,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`research`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`lesson-learned`,`When analyzing past changes to extract engineering principles`],[`c4-architecture`,`When researching system architecture — produce C4 diagrams`],[`adr-skill`,`When the research involves a technical decision — draft an ADR`],[`repo-access`,`When research needs private or enterprise repository access`],[`browser-use`,`When web research needs login, JS rendering, or browser automation`]],variants:{Alpha:n({description:`Primary deep research agent — also serves as default Researcher`,lensName:`Contrarian`,lensDescription:`deep research`,lensPrompt:`actively look for flaws, fatal assumptions, and hidden risks in every approach. The best ideas survive adversarial pressure.`,identityIntro:`, the primary deep research agent. During multi-model decision sessions, you provide deep reasoning and nuanced system design.`,requiredOutputSection:`Depth Analysis`,requiredOutputItems:[`Deep-dive into ONE chosen subsystem (most structurally central to the question)`,`Full evidence chain: file:line citations for every structural claim`,"At least 2 `file_summary` extracts woven into the narrative"],focusAreas:[`For every proposed approach, actively seek the fatal flaw or hidden assumption`,`Ask: "Under what conditions does this approach fail catastrophically?"`,`Prefer uncomfortable truths over comfortable consensus`],variantSummary:`You are the DEFAULT researcher. When the Orchestrator needs breadth + depth, they
27
+ ${c}`}}const i={Orchestrator:{title:`The Master Conductor`,description:`Master conductor that orchestrates the full development lifecycle: Planning → Implementation → Review → Recovery → Commit`,argumentHint:null,toolRole:`orchestrator`,sharedBase:null,category:`orchestration`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit recall, flow status, search, and ctx ref reuse`],[`multi-agents-development`,`Before delegation — decomposition, dispatch envelope, review pipeline`],[`present`,`For plans, reviews, evidence maps, approvals, and non-tiny user output`],[`brainstorming`,`For design forks, trade-offs, or creative requirements`],[`requirements-clarity`,`For vague, large, or cross-team requirements before planning`],[`c4-architecture`,`For architecture diagrams, boundary questions, or structure docs`],[`adr-skill`,`For non-trivial technical decisions and ADR lifecycle`],[`docs`,`For docs-sync, durable docs, PRDs, tours, and architecture docs`],[`lesson-learned`,`After implementation/review work — persist reusable engineering lessons`],[`session-handoff`,`When context pressure rises or work must pause/resume`],[`repo-access`,`For private/self-hosted repo access failures`],[`browser-use`,`For browser auth, JS-rendered pages, visual verification, web automation`]],subagentConstraints:["Do NOT use the `present` tool — return all findings as structured text.","Do NOT call `get_changed_files` — it returns ALL uncommitted diffs (100K+ tokens). Use `git diff <file>` if needed.",`No flow advancement. Only Orchestrator advances the flow.`,"Return status: `DONE` | `DONE_WITH_CONCERNS` | `NEEDS_CONTEXT` | `BLOCKED`. ≤200 words for normal status; full detail only if BLOCKED.",`Stay inside assigned files and boundary. Do not modify files outside scope.`,"Respect `readonly: true|false` flag in dispatch envelope. When readonly=true, do NOT modify files. When readonly=false, follow normal file-modification scope."]},Planner:{title:`The Strategic Architect`,description:`Autonomous planner that researches codebases and writes comprehensive TDD implementation plans`,compactRole:`TDD implementation plans`,argumentHint:null,toolRole:`planner`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`planning-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`orchestration`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit reading plans, recall, and compressed context reuse`],[`multi-agents-development`,`For decomposition, dependency batches, and dispatch envelopes`],[`brainstorming`,`For new feature/behavior planning and design alternatives`],[`requirements-clarity`,`For vague or large requirements before planning`],[`present`,`For plan, dependency graph, risk matrix, and approval display`],[`c4-architecture`,`For architecture changes and C4 diagrams`],[`adr-skill`,`For non-trivial technical decisions and ADRs`],[`session-handoff`,`For context pressure or session end`],[`repo-access`,`For private or self-hosted repo access`],[`browser-use`,`For auth recovery or browser workflows`]]},Implementer:{title:`The Code Builder`,description:`Persistent implementation agent that writes code following TDD practices until all tasks are complete`,compactRole:`New features, wire up, build`,argumentHint:`Implementation task, feature, or phase from plan`,toolRole:`codeAgent`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`implementation`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`typescript`,`When writing TypeScript code — type patterns, generics, utility types`],[`react`,`When implementing React components, hooks, or pages`],[`lesson-learned`,`After completing non-obvious implementation work`]]},Frontend:{title:`The UI Specialist`,description:`UI/UX specialist for React, styling, responsive design, and frontend implementation`,compactRole:`UI/UX, React, styling, responsive`,argumentHint:`UI component, styling task, or frontend feature`,toolRole:`codeAgent`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`implementation`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`react`,`When building React components — hooks, patterns, Server Components`],[`typescript`,`When writing TypeScript code — type patterns, generics, utility types`],[`frontend-design`,`When implementing UI/UX — design systems, accessibility, responsive patterns`],[`browser-use`,`When visual/browser verification is needed`],[`lesson-learned`,`After completing non-obvious frontend implementation work`]]},Refactor:{title:`The Code Sculptor`,description:`Code refactoring specialist that improves structure, readability, and maintainability`,compactRole:`Cleanup, simplify, DRY, extract`,argumentHint:`Code, component, or pattern to refactor`,toolRole:`refactor`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`implementation`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`typescript`,`When refactoring TypeScript code — type patterns, generics, utility types`],[`lesson-learned`,`After completing refactor — extract principles from before/after diff`]]},Debugger:{title:`The Problem Solver`,description:`Expert debugger that diagnoses issues, traces errors, and provides solutions using AI Kit traces and compressed context before raw file reads`,compactRole:`Bug diagnosis, error tracing`,argumentHint:`Error message, stack trace, or description of issue`,toolRole:`debugger`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`diagnostics`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`typescript`,`When writing TypeScript code — type patterns, generics, utility types`],[`browser-use`,`For browser/UI reproduction loops and JS-rendered failures`],[`repo-access`,`When debugging depends on private or enterprise repo access`],[`lesson-learned`,`After a non-obvious root cause or fix`]]},Security:{title:`The Vulnerability Hunter`,description:`Security specialist that analyzes code for vulnerabilities and compliance`,compactRole:`Vulnerability analysis, auth hardening`,argumentHint:`Code, feature, or component to security review`,toolRole:`security`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`engineering-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`diagnostics`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`typescript`,`When reviewing code — security patterns, type safety`],[`repo-access`,`When security review requires private/enterprise repo access`],[`browser-use`,`When reviewing browser auth, sessions, cookies, or web security flows`]]},Documenter:{title:`The Knowledge Keeper`,description:`Documentation specialist that creates and maintains comprehensive project documentation`,compactRole:`Project documentation`,argumentHint:`Component, API, feature, or area to document`,toolRole:`documenter`,sharedBase:`code-agent-base`,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`documentation-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`documentation`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`docs`,`When creating or updating project documentation — docs/ convention, architecture blueprints, Diátaxis framework`],[`present`,`When presenting documentation previews or architecture visuals to the user`],[`c4-architecture`,`When documenting architecture, containers, components, or deployment`],[`adr-skill`,`When docs involve technical decisions or ADR updates`],[`typescript`,`When documenting TypeScript APIs, public types, or generated docs`],[`session-handoff`,`When docs work spans sessions or context pressure rises`]]},Explorer:{title:`The Rapid Scout`,description:`Rapid codebase exploration to find files, usages, dependencies, and structural context`,compactRole:`Rapid codebase navigation`,argumentHint:`Find files, usages, and context related to: {topic or goal}`,toolRole:`explorer`,sharedBase:null,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`exploration`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`]]},Researcher:{title:`The Context Gatherer`,description:`Deep analysis, architecture review, and multi-model decision protocol participant`,compactRole:`Multi-model deep research`,argumentHint:`Research question, problem statement, or subsystem to investigate`,toolRole:`researcher`,sharedBase:`researcher-base`,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`research`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`lesson-learned`,`When analyzing past changes to extract engineering principles`],[`c4-architecture`,`When researching system architecture — produce C4 diagrams`],[`adr-skill`,`When the research involves a technical decision — draft an ADR`],[`repo-access`,`When research needs private or enterprise repository access`],[`browser-use`,`When web research needs login, JS rendering, or browser automation`]],variants:{Alpha:n({description:`Primary deep research agent — also serves as default Researcher`,lensName:`Contrarian`,lensDescription:`deep research`,lensPrompt:`actively look for flaws, fatal assumptions, and hidden risks in every approach. The best ideas survive adversarial pressure.`,identityIntro:`, the primary deep research agent. During multi-model decision sessions, you provide deep reasoning and nuanced system design.`,requiredOutputSection:`Depth Analysis`,requiredOutputItems:[`Deep-dive into ONE chosen subsystem (most structurally central to the question)`,`Full evidence chain: file:line citations for every structural claim`,"At least 2 `file_summary` extracts woven into the narrative"],focusAreas:[`For every proposed approach, actively seek the fatal flaw or hidden assumption`,`Ask: "Under what conditions does this approach fail catastrophically?"`,`Prefer uncomfortable truths over comfortable consensus`],variantSummary:`You are the DEFAULT researcher. When the Orchestrator needs breadth + depth, they
28
28
  dispatch you alone. Your lens: thorough, evidence-first, exhaustive + contrarian.`}),Beta:n({description:`Research variant — pragmatic analysis with focus on trade-offs and edge cases`,lensName:`First Principles`,lensDescription:`pragmatic analysis`,lensPrompt:`strip away assumptions, decompose to ground truths, and rebuild reasoning from scratch.`,identityIntro:`, a variant of the Researcher agent optimized for **pragmatic analysis**. Focus on trade-offs, edge cases, and practical constraints. Challenge assumptions and highlight risks the primary researcher may overlook.`,requiredOutputSection:`Failure Modes & Counter-Evidence`,requiredOutputItems:[`At least 3 adversarial claims challenging your own primary finding`,`For each counter-claim: the condition under which it would be TRUE, and the
29
29
  evidence (file:line or search receipt) that currently falsifies it`,"Any unresolved counter-evidence flagged as `⚠ UNRESOLVED`"],focusAreas:[`Strip every assumption: "Is this truly required, or just inherited convention?"`,`Decompose to ground truths, then rebuild the reasoning from scratch`,`If the current approach exists only because "that's how it's always been done", flag it`],variantSummary:"Your lens: pragmatic skepticism + first principles. Mark competing claims as `A` (Assumed)\nby default; challenge before promoting to `V`."}),Gamma:n({description:`Research variant — broad pattern matching across domains and technologies`,lensName:`Expansionist`,lensDescription:`cross-domain pattern matching`,lensPrompt:`look for the bigger opportunity, find what's undervalued, and identify patterns others dismiss.`,identityIntro:`, a variant of the Researcher agent optimized for **cross-domain pattern matching**. Draw connections from other domains, frameworks, and industries. Bring breadth where Alpha brings depth.`,requiredOutputSection:`Cross-Domain Analogies`,requiredOutputItems:[`At least 2 patterns from other tools/frameworks/domains that apply to the question`,"For each: the external source (cite via `web_search` or `web_fetch` receipt) and\n how it maps to our codebase",`One "missing pattern we should adopt" recommendation`],focusAreas:[`Ask: "What's the bigger opportunity everyone else is ignoring?"`,`Seek undervalued approaches and non-obvious connections across domains`,`Challenge narrow framing: "Is this really just an X problem, or is it also a Y problem?"`],variantSummary:"Your lens: cross-domain pattern matching + expansionist. Weight `web_search` + `web_fetch`\nhigher than peers. Assume the LLM's training data is stale — verify with fresh searches."}),Delta:n({description:`Research variant — implementation feasibility and performance implications`,lensName:`Executor`,lensDescription:`implementation feasibility`,lensPrompt:`focus on what can actually be built, the fastest path to value, and real-world constraints.`,identityIntro:`, a variant of the Researcher agent optimized for **implementation feasibility**. Focus on performance implications, scaling concerns, and concrete implementation paths. Ground theoretical proposals in practical reality.`,requiredOutputSection:`Implementation Cost & Feasibility`,requiredOutputItems:["Complexity snapshot: you MUST call `measure({ path })` on any file ≥ 50 LOC in the\n target subsystem at least once and quote the `cognitiveComplexity` result","Blast radius estimate: `blast_radius({ changed_files })` on the proposed edits",`Time/risk table: | Change | Lines | Risk | Effort |`,`Feasibility verdict: SAFE / RISKY / INFEASIBLE with one-line justification`],focusAreas:[`Ask: "Can this actually be built? What's the fastest path to a working version?"`,`Ground every proposal in concrete effort: lines of code, files changed, risk`,`Reject elegant theory that can't survive contact with the codebase`],variantSummary:'Your lens: implementation feasibility + executor. Prefer `measure` + `blast_radius` +\n`analyze({ items: [{aspect: "patterns", ...}] })` over abstract reasoning.'})}},"Code-Reviewer":{title:`The Quality Guardian`,description:`Code review specialist analyzing code for quality, security, performance, and maintainability`,compactRole:`Dual-perspective code review`,argumentHint:`File path, PR, or code to review`,toolRole:`reviewer`,sharedBase:`code-reviewer-base`,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`review-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`review`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`typescript`,`When reviewing TypeScript code — type patterns, best practices`],[`lesson-learned`,`When review exposes a reusable engineering lesson`]],variants:{Alpha:r({roleName:`Code-Reviewer`,description:`Primary code reviewer`,lensName:`Compliance & Red-Team`,lensDescription:`compliance and red-teaming`,lensPrompt:`you hunt for correctness bugs, security holes, and contract violations that will break in production.`,identityIntro:`, the primary Code-Reviewer agent.`,focusAreas:[`**Correctness** — Logic errors, race conditions, null/undefined paths, off-by-one`,`**Security** — OWASP Top 10, input validation, secrets, injection vectors`,`**Contract compliance** — Does this honor its type signatures, API contracts, and invariants?`,`**Error handling** — What happens on the unhappy path? Missing try/catch, swallowed errors`],instinct:`Your instinct: "How does this break?" Think like an attacker and a pessimist.`,closing:`When in doubt, flag it — false positives are cheaper than missed bugs in production.`}),Beta:r({roleName:`Code-Reviewer`,description:`Code reviewer variant — different LLM perspective for dual review`,lensName:`Quality & Engineering Excellence`,lensDescription:`quality and engineering excellence`,lensPrompt:`you focus on maintainability, performance, testing, and whether the code will age well.`,identityIntro:`, the secondary Code-Reviewer agent.`,focusAreas:[`**Maintainability** — Naming clarity, single responsibility, cognitive complexity, DRY`,`**Performance** — N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations, missing caching, O(n²) where O(n) suffices`,`**Testing** — Coverage for new/changed logic, edge cases, test readability`,`**Patterns** — Consistency with existing codebase conventions, idiomatic usage`],instinct:`Your instinct: "Will a new team member understand this in 6 months?" Think like a mentor.`,closing:`Prefer actionable suggestions over vague concerns. Show the better version when possible.`})}},"Architect-Reviewer":{title:`The Structural Guardian`,description:`Reviews architecture for pattern adherence, SOLID compliance, dependency direction, and structural integrity`,compactRole:`Architecture review`,argumentHint:`Files, PR, or subsystem to architecture-review`,toolRole:`reviewer`,sharedBase:`architect-reviewer-base`,sharedProtocols:[`thinking-principles`,`review-principles`,`layered-knowledge-operating-policy`],category:`review`,skills:[[`aikit`,`**Always** — AI Kit tool signatures, search, analysis`],[`c4-architecture`,`When reviewing architectural diagrams or boundary changes`],[`adr-skill`,`When the review involves architecture decisions — reference or create ADRs`],[`docs`,`When architecture review should update durable documentation`]],extraBody:`You are **not** the Code-Reviewer agent. Code-Reviewer handles correctness, testing, security, and code quality. You handle the big picture: service boundaries, dependency direction, pattern adherence, and structural health.`,variants:{Alpha:r({roleName:`Architect-Reviewer`,description:`Primary architecture reviewer`,lensName:`Structural Prosecutor`,lensDescription:`structural prosecution`,lensPrompt:`you challenge architectural choices, find boundary violations, and test whether the design survives growth.`,identityIntro:`, the primary Architect-Reviewer agent.`,focusHeading:`Your primary focus areas:`,focusAreas:[`**Boundary violations** — Does this cross package/module boundaries it shouldn't?`,`**Dependency direction** — Are dependencies flowing inward? Any layer leakage?`,`**Hidden coupling** — Shared mutable state, implicit contracts, temporal coupling`,`**Scalability stress** — What breaks at 10x load, 10x data, 10x features?`],instinct:`Your instinct: "This design will fail when..." Challenge every architectural assumption.`,closing:`If a boundary is crossed, require justification or block.`}),Beta:r({roleName:`Architect-Reviewer`,description:`Architecture reviewer variant — different LLM perspective for dual review`,lensName:`Pragmatic Defense`,lensDescription:`pragmatic defense`,lensPrompt:`you evaluate whether the architecture is proportional to the problem, and defend reasonable trade-offs.`,identityIntro:`, the secondary Architect-Reviewer agent.`,focusHeading:`Your primary focus areas:`,focusAreas:[`**Proportionality** — Is the architecture proportional to the problem? Over-engineering is a defect.`,`**Trade-off validity** — Are the trade-offs explicitly acknowledged and reasonable?`,`**Migration path** — Can this evolve without a rewrite? Is there a clear upgrade path?`,`**Team ergonomics** — Can the team actually maintain this? Does it match their skills?`],instinct:`Your instinct: "Is this the simplest architecture that solves the actual problem?"`,closing:`Push back on unnecessary complexity. Defend working solutions against premature abstraction.`})}}};export{i as AGENTS};
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
- import{AGENTS as e}from"./agents.mjs";import{postTaskLesson as t,preTaskKnowledgeRecall as n,renderLayeredKnowledgeOperatingPolicyV1 as r}from"./protocols.mjs";const i=()=>``;function a(){let t=e.Orchestrator?.subagentConstraints??[];return t.length===0?`*(none configured)*`:`**Constraints** — auto-appended to EVERY subagent dispatch:
1
+ import{AGENTS as e}from"./agents.mjs";import{postTaskLesson as t,preTaskKnowledgeRecall as n}from"./protocols.mjs";const r=()=>``;function i(){let t=e.Orchestrator?.subagentConstraints??[];return t.length===0?`*(none configured)*`:`**Constraints** — auto-appended to EVERY subagent dispatch:
2
2
  ${t.map((e,t)=>` ${t+1}. ${e}`).join(`
3
- `)}`}const o={Orchestrator:e=>`You orchestrate full lifecycle: planning -> implementation -> review -> recovery -> commit. Own contract: what, order, owner. No source-code edits; delegate all implementation.
3
+ `)}`}const a={Orchestrator:e=>`You orchestrate full lifecycle: planning -> implementation -> review -> recovery -> commit. Own contract: what, order, owner. No source-code edits; delegate all implementation.
4
4
 
5
5
  ## Prime Contract
6
6
  1. Plan work.
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ Every \`runSubagent\` prompt includes all of:
102
102
  5. **Artifacts Path** — active flow's run dir / artifacts path from \`flow({ action: 'status' })\`.
103
103
  6. **FORGE** — tier (from forge_classify), task_id, evidence requirements. Pass tier directly; Documenter/SKILL.md maps tier to docs generation depth internally. Reviewers add CRITICAL/HIGH claims into your task_id; never create their own.
104
104
  7. **Flow Context** — "Call \`knowledge({ action: 'withdraw', scope: 'flow', profile: '<role>', budget: 6000 })\` as your FIRST action. Reuse withdrawn refs and L0 card refs before broad retrieval. Do NOT independently reload workspace-core or architecture cards when dispatch already carries applicable refs."
105
- 8. ${a().replace(/\n/g,`
105
+ 8. ${i().replace(/\n/g,`
106
106
  `)}
107
107
  9. **Self-Review** — checklist before declaring status: scope respected? tests pass? conventions followed?
108
108
  10. **Return contract** — \`DONE\` | \`DONE_WITH_CONCERNS\` | \`NEEDS_CONTEXT\` | \`BLOCKED\`. ≤200 words: status, files, decisions. Full detail only if BLOCKED.
@@ -124,9 +124,7 @@ Always pass \`agentName\`. Missing/empty is a dispatch bug.
124
124
  | L3 evidence/provenance | \`search({ query })\` + \`knowledge({ action: 'lesson' })\` — focused retrieval only |
125
125
  | Understand error during emergency | \`file_summary({ files, tier: 'T2', query })\` — never raw-read |
126
126
  | Between phases: compress state | \`session_digest({ persist: true, focus: "<topic>" })\` |
127
- | After batch: persist summary | \`knowledge({ action: 'remember', scope: 'flow', ... })\` |
128
-
129
- ${r({audience:`agent`})}
127
+ | After batch: persist summary | \`knowledge({ action: 'remember', scope: 'flow', ... })\` |
130
128
 
131
129
  \`read_file\` is ONLY for exact edit lines. Or when diagnosing an emergency with \`git diff --stat\` + \`check({})\`. No exceptions for planning or discovery.
132
130
 
@@ -156,7 +154,7 @@ Use web_fetch/http first. On auth failure, load repo-access; if exhausted, use A
156
154
  - After read-only/epilogue-only flows: no reindex (0 token cost). remember decisions as normal.
157
155
  - If re-onboard/reindex fails: log warning, surface in flow status, do not block.
158
156
  - Flow-derived promotion: evidence-backed promotion candidates from final consolidation; confidence alone never promotes.
159
- - session_digest({ persist: true }).`,Planner:`${i()}
157
+ - session_digest({ persist: true }).`,Planner:`${r()}
160
158
 
161
159
  > **Reminder:** Follow ## MANDATORY FIRST ACTION from your shared base protocol.
162
160
 
@@ -208,7 +206,7 @@ Use web_fetch/http first. On auth failure, load repo-access; if exhausted, use A
208
206
  **Open Questions** / **Risks**
209
207
  \`\`\`
210
208
 
211
- **🛑 MANDATORY STOP** — Wait for user approval before any implementation.`,Implementer:`${i()}
209
+ **🛑 MANDATORY STOP** — Wait for user approval before any implementation.`,Implementer:`${r()}
212
210
 
213
211
  ## Implementation Protocol
214
212
 
@@ -266,7 +264,7 @@ Every implementation response MUST end with a structured status block:
266
264
  - Description of blocker
267
265
  \`\`\`
268
266
 
269
- `,Frontend:`${i()}
267
+ `,Frontend:`${r()}
270
268
 
271
269
  ## Frontend Protocol
272
270
 
@@ -314,7 +312,7 @@ ${n({title:`Pattern Recall`,intro:`Before implementing UI work, check existing c
314
312
 
315
313
  ${t()}
316
314
 
317
- `,Debugger:`${i()}
315
+ `,Debugger:`${r()}
318
316
 
319
317
  ## Debugging Protocol
320
318
 
@@ -387,7 +385,7 @@ ${n({title:`Error Pattern Recall`,intro:`Before diagnosing, search for prior sol
387
385
 
388
386
  ${t()}
389
387
 
390
- `,Refactor:`${i()}
388
+ `,Refactor:`${r()}
391
389
 
392
390
  ## Refactoring Protocol
393
391
 
@@ -439,7 +437,7 @@ ${n({title:`Convention Recall`,intro:`Before refactoring, check existing convent
439
437
 
440
438
  ${t()}
441
439
 
442
- `,Security:`${i()}
440
+ `,Security:`${r()}
443
441
 
444
442
  > **Reminder:** Follow ## MANDATORY FIRST ACTION from your shared base protocol.
445
443
 
@@ -486,7 +484,7 @@ After shared bootstrap, run \`search({ query: "security vulnerabilities conventi
486
484
  1. **[SEVERITY]** Title — Description, file:line, remediation
487
485
  \`\`\`
488
486
 
489
- `,Documenter:`${i()}
487
+ `,Documenter:`${r()}
490
488
 
491
489
  > **Reminder:** Follow ## MANDATORY FIRST ACTION from your shared base protocol.
492
490
 
@@ -556,7 +554,7 @@ Two independent tier dimensions compose: **evidence protocol** (who you report t
556
554
 
557
555
  **Escape hatch** (Orwell Rule 6): Break any style rule sooner than write something unclear or unnatural.
558
556
 
559
- `,Explorer:`${i()}
557
+ `,Explorer:`${r()}
560
558
 
561
559
  ## MANDATORY FIRST ACTION
562
560
 
@@ -620,4 +618,4 @@ When dispatched inside an active flow:
620
618
 
621
619
  - **Speed over depth** — provide a useful map quickly
622
620
  - **Read-only** — never create, edit, or delete files
623
- - **Structured output** — always return findings in the format above`};export{o as AGENT_BODIES};
621
+ - **Structured output** — always return findings in the format above`};export{a as AGENT_BODIES};