@voltro/protocol 0.42.0 → 0.43.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +91 -0
- package/dist/apikey.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dist/index.d.ts +199 -8
- package/dist/index.js +188 -150
- package/dist/jwt.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dist/rest.d.ts +3 -3
- package/dist/session.d.ts +2 -2
- package/package.json +3 -3
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -39,6 +39,97 @@ _Changes staged for the next release accumulate here (rolled up from
|
|
|
39
39
|
|
|
40
40
|
---
|
|
41
41
|
|
|
42
|
+
## [0.43.0] — 2026-08-18
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
### ⚠ BREAKING
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
- **@voltro/data-transfer, @voltro/cli** — `DanglingReferenceError` is now `RowsRefusedError`, and it separates the rows that failed from the rows that failed because those rows did.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
**The name.** The import raised it for EVERY row still refused after deferred-FK resolution, whatever the reason — a NOT NULL violation, a duplicate key, a value the database computes for itself. The tag named ONE possible cause and put it where a reader looks first, so any other refusal arrived mislabelled. The new name states the outcome; each row's `reason` states the cause, which is where a cause can honestly be claimed.
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
**The split.** A row is `derived` when one of its reference columns holds the primary key of another row that also failed in this run: it could not have landed whatever it contained, so its reason describes the parent's problem. The relation is transitive, decided from the DATA (the failed ids against the reference-typed values), so no schema knowledge is needed. `primaryCount` is the number an operator acts on, `rows` lists primary failures FIRST so the cap never spends its budget on consequences, and the CLI leads with both numbers:
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
```
|
|
53
|
+
import refused 300 row(s), of which 1 are the actual failures — the rest could
|
|
54
|
+
not land because a row they reference did not.
|
|
55
|
+
teams t1 foreign key teams_ibfk_1: the referenced row does not exist [1452]
|
|
56
|
+
… and 299 row(s) behind them. Fix the 1 above and re-run; they resolve with
|
|
57
|
+
their parents.
|
|
58
|
+
```
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
In an FK-dense bundle one refused parent takes its whole subtree with it, so the length of a flat list says how connected the data is, not how many problems there are — and the single row that explains all of them sits somewhere in the middle of it.
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
The codemod rewrites the import and every use of the symbol. It does NOT rewrite a tag STRING (`Effect.catchTag('DanglingReferenceError', …)`, `err._tag === '…'`) — change those to `'RowsRefusedError'` — and the payload gained `primaryCount` plus a `derived` flag per row.
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
### Fixed
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
- **@voltro/cli** — `voltro doctor`'s `subject-write-no-guard` rule reads the DESCRIPTOR before it reports. It looked only at the executor, and the access decision is not declared there.
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
Every form of access decision the framework has — `internal: true`, `guards: [...]`, `openAccess:` — is declared on the DESCRIPTOR. So an app that declares them properly got a finding for each one, and on a codebase whose procedures are mostly `internal: true` the rule fires on essentially all of them and is wrong essentially every time.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
That is worse than a rule that finds nothing: it is the longest line in the report and it reads like a security finding, so it teaches the reader to skim the place a real finding would have appeared.
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
The premise was structurally impossible for most of them, and the framework says so itself: `security.defaultDeny` refuses at boot any wire-exposed procedure declaring neither `guards:` nor `openAccess:`. So "an anonymous caller reaches the write" can only be true of an `openAccess` procedure. That is what the rule looks for now — plus the handler check it always honoured, plus an ownership comparison against `subject.id`, which is the refusal the rule says is missing. Where no descriptor can be read, it says nothing: the claim is about a declaration, and a finding whose evidence was never opened is the failure mode this fixes.
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
The `use:` line changed with it. It recommended `.guard(requireScope('…'))`; the shipped guide teaches declarative `guards:` and calls a hand-written per-executor scope check the thing `guards:` exists to delete. A rule may not recommend the shape the guide argues against.
|
|
75
|
+
- **@voltro/database, @voltro/data-transfer** — A `voltro data` transfer no longer carries GENERATED column values, and no longer loses every row that has one.
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
The export wrote the computed values into the bundle and the import sent them back in the `INSERT` column list. MariaDB refuses that for any value except NULL (`1906: The value specified for generated column 'x' in table 't' has been ignored`); postgres refuses a non-DEFAULT value outright. So the transfer failed per ROW, not per table, and only for the rows whose generated value was non-NULL.
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
That selectivity is the dangerous part. `.uniqueActive()` lowers to exactly such a column on mysql/mariadb — a STORED generated column holding the key while the row is live and NULL once it is soft-deleted — so the refused rows are the LIVE ones and the accepted ones are the tombstones. A table can come out looking like "a few rows failed" or empty, depending only on how many of its rows are deleted, and any table with a foreign key into it fails behind it.
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
Both ends are fixed from one source of truth: **introspection now reports generated columns on every dialect** (`generatedAs`, from `information_schema.generation_expression` on mysql/mariadb, `is_generated` on postgres, `PRAGMA table_xinfo`'s hidden flag on sqlite, `sys.computed_columns` on mssql). It was declared-side only before — invisible to the planner, which does not compare it, and load-bearing for anything that writes rows back.
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
The exporter omits those columns, values and all. The importer strips them from every incoming row using the TARGET's snapshot, because a bundle already written still carries them and a file on disk is data, read where it is.
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
**`voltro serve`'s admin export/import needed a second fix, and without it this one reached only the direct transport.** The running instance hands those handlers `declaredSnapshot(tables)` — no dialect — and `.uniqueActive()` lowers to a generated column only when the snapshot knows the engine. So over `--target api` the snapshot described a schema with no generated columns while the database had several, and the export wrote their values back into the bundle exactly as before. It passes the dialect now (the variable was already on the next line).
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
`generatedAs` is also kept OUT of the schema fingerprint. Introspection can read the fact back but not a comparable value — the engine returns its own normalisation of the expression, never the declared spelling — so hashing it would make declared and live disagree permanently: a schema nobody touched reporting a changed declaration on every boot, and a transfer target that matches its bundle exactly refused as drifted.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
Covered by a live mariadb→mariadb and mysql→mysql round trip over a `.uniqueActive()` table with live and soft-deleted rows, asserting the target recomputed the value rather than that the row merely arrived.
|
|
90
|
+
- **@voltro/sql-mysql** — On mysql/mariadb, a write REJECTED by the database through `insertIgnore` was reported as a conflict when the caller was not inside a transaction — and never reached the caller as a typed `ConstraintViolation` at all.
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
Two causes, both measured against live MySQL 8.4 and MariaDB 11.
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
**The connection.** `INSERT IGNORE` demotes every error to a warning, so the store reads `SHOW WARNINGS` to tell a rejection from a conflict. That describes the last statement on a CONNECTION, and outside a transaction every statement acquires its own from the pool — so the read was unattributable and came back empty. The rejected write then surfaced as "the insert was skipped as a conflict, but no existing row matches conflictColumns […] the constraint that fired is unknown", whose enumeration lists only conflict causes. A rejection described as a conflict is the exact sentence this path was fixed once already for producing; it survived on the path that had no transaction to read on. The store now pins one connection for the whole decision — the same pinning `insertRecoverAutoId` does for `LAST_INSERT_ID()`.
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
**The classification.** The store swallowed the driver's error and raised a prose one of its own, so `classifyConstraintViolation` had nothing to read: this was the one write path where the typed error could not fire, while every other one produced it. The warning IS the driver's payload — `INSERT IGNORE` only changed how it was delivered — so it is handed on in the shape the driver would have thrown. A rejection now arrives as the same `ConstraintViolation { kind: 'foreignKey', … }` a plain `insert` produces. Nothing new crosses the wire: the classifier extracts the constraint NAME as a delimited group, never the sentence.
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
This is the default `voltro data import` path (`--mode append`, `--on-conflict skip`, without `--atomic`), so a row rejected by a foreign key was reported to the operator as a conflict with an unknown cause.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
`constraintViolation.integration.test.ts` now asserts the `insertIgnore` seam per dialect against live postgres 17, MySQL 8.4, MariaDB 11 and SQL Server 2022. It was the missing assertion behind a claim derived from the wiring — the classification does sit on all ten write paths, which is not the same as a classifiable error arriving on all ten.
|
|
101
|
+
- **@voltro/protocol, @voltro/runtime** — The framework's store errors — `ConstraintViolation`, `TenantScopeViolation`, `TenantRowNotFound`, `ServerOnlyColumnWrite`, `TableValidationFailed`, `StoreOperationFailed` — are exported from `@voltro/protocol` and can therefore be declared in a descriptor's `error:` union. They could not be.
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
They lived in `@voltro/runtime`, which reaches `node:child_process`, `node:http` and `node:crypto`. A descriptor is loaded VALUE-LEVEL by the web client (the `RpcClient` needs every procedure's Schema), so a descriptor importing from there is refused at boot by the browser-safety guard — correctly. The typed half of these errors was therefore unreachable: the docs told you to declare them, and the boot said no.
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
What that leaves is the untyped half only. The error still arrives as an `InternalError` carrying a readable sentence, so telling `foreignKey` ("the row you picked is gone") from `foreignKeyInUse` ("this row is still referenced") — two different messages for the user — means parsing that sentence. Over a set of generated delete mutations that is a string comparison per procedure, which is the thing the typed error exists to delete.
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
`@voltro/runtime` re-exports all six, so server code is unchanged. The classes have no server dependency of any kind — the file imports `Schema` from `effect` and nothing else, and `browserSafetyGuard.test.ts` now pins a descriptor that declares one, so moving them back reads as a boot failure rather than as a passing rename.
|
|
108
|
+
- **@voltro/database, @voltro/sql-mysql** — A blocked `alter-column-type` told every dialect to write a postgres cast.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
The refusal is correct — a bare type change may not be value-preserving, so it is refused until acknowledged. Its `fix:` line was not:
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
```
|
|
113
|
+
acknowledge it on the column: `.narrowedFrom('json', { using: 'meta::text' })`
|
|
114
|
+
```
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
`USING <expr>` is postgres syntax and a postgres capability. The mysql arm of the applier emits `MODIFY COLUMN`, the mssql arm `ALTER COLUMN`, and sqlite rebuilds the table — none of them can carry a cast expression and none of them reads `using`. So an operator on any other engine was handed a line to paste into their schema containing syntax their database has never seen, inside an argument that is discarded. A refusal is read as an instruction, and the more carefully it is read the more thoroughly a wrong one is followed.
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
The fix line is dialect-aware now: postgres keeps the `using` half, everything else gets `.narrowedFrom('<type>')` plus the fact that the engine converts in place — because a refusal that offers no expressible fix reads as "the framework cannot do this at all".
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
Covered on live MySQL and MariaDB by both halves at once: what the refusal SAYS, and that following it applies AND converges with the row intact. A message test alone would keep passing over a broken apply; a convergence test alone is what let the wrong message survive this long.
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
Also on the same path: `upsert` with a PARTIAL row (one omitting a NOT NULL column that has no default) failed on MariaDB and succeeded on MySQL. The native `INSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE` validates its insert half even when only the update half runs, so the row was rejected although the target existed and only needed patching. A partial row takes the lookup path on both engines now; the single-statement form still covers the complete-row case, which is what a data transfer and every generated CRUD write send.
|
|
123
|
+
- **@voltro/sql-mysql** — On MariaDB, `upsert` could write a DIFFERENT row than the one it was given and report success.
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
`INSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE` fires on ANY unique key, not on the one named in `conflictColumns`. So an incoming row whose (say) `email` already belonged to a different primary key updated THAT row instead — and since `id` is excluded from the SET list, the row the caller handed over was never written. Measured on a live server: the call returned a row, the target kept the old id, the new row was absent, and the existing row had silently taken the incoming values. A bulk transfer on top of that prints `import complete` over missing data, which is the worst failure shape available: there is nothing to investigate.
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
The two engines of the family disagreed here, which is part of why it survived. The non-RETURNING path (MySQL) looks the row up by `conflictColumns` first, does not find it, and lets the INSERT fail with a duplicate-key error. Loud was always right.
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
Both refuse now, with a message naming both ids and the fact that the collision was on a constraint other than the one named. The check runs inside a transaction — a short one of the store's own when the caller is not already in one — so the wrong row is rolled back rather than reported after the fact: detecting this afterwards still leaves someone else's row overwritten.
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
---
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
42
133
|
## [0.42.0] — 2026-08-17
|
|
43
134
|
|
|
44
135
|
### ⚠ BREAKING
|
package/dist/apikey.d.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ declare const Subject: Schema.Union<[Schema.Struct<{
|
|
|
205
205
|
* Set when this caller PRESENTED a credential and it was rejected — an
|
|
206
206
|
* expired token above all. Absent when they presented none.
|
|
207
207
|
*
|
|
208
|
-
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A
|
|
208
|
+
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A deployment
|
|
209
209
|
* measured the cost: a user's tab outlived their IdP's token lifetime, the
|
|
210
210
|
* strategy logged `supabase jwt expired`, the caller fell through to
|
|
211
211
|
* anonymous, and the guard then refused with `missing required scope
|
package/dist/index.d.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -1049,6 +1049,64 @@ export declare const connectionSubmitTokenDescriptor: MutationProcedureDescripto
|
|
|
1049
1049
|
ok: typeof Schema.Boolean;
|
|
1050
1050
|
}>, Schema.Union<[typeof ConnectionNotDeclared, typeof ConnectionSubjectRequired, typeof ConnectionKindMismatch, typeof ConnectionHandshakeFailed]>>;
|
|
1051
1051
|
|
|
1052
|
+
/**
|
|
1053
|
+
* The database refused a write because it broke an integrity rule the SCHEMA
|
|
1054
|
+
* declares — a foreign key, a unique index, a NOT NULL, a CHECK.
|
|
1055
|
+
*
|
|
1056
|
+
* **Why this is typed at all.** Without it the driver failure is a `SqlError`,
|
|
1057
|
+
* which the rpc layer collapses to a bare `InternalError` on purpose (a
|
|
1058
|
+
* `SqlError`'s text is not safe to forward — see below). The caller then gets
|
|
1059
|
+
* "something went wrong" for a failure that is entirely about the input it just
|
|
1060
|
+
* sent, and the only way to find out which rule fired is to re-run the
|
|
1061
|
+
* statement by hand against the database. That is a real reported shape:
|
|
1062
|
+
* that.
|
|
1063
|
+
*
|
|
1064
|
+
* **Why it carries names and not the driver's sentence.** The temptation is to
|
|
1065
|
+
* forward `cause.message`, and it is measured to be wrong: postgres attaches
|
|
1066
|
+
* `Failing row contains (…)` — the complete row, every column — to a not-null
|
|
1067
|
+
* and a check violation; mysql and mssql echo the duplicate VALUE on a unique
|
|
1068
|
+
* violation. A constraint or column NAME is schema, which this framework
|
|
1069
|
+
* already puts on the wire (`TableValidationFailed.table`). A row is data, and
|
|
1070
|
+
* the caller who provoked the error is not automatically entitled to it.
|
|
1071
|
+
*
|
|
1072
|
+
* **Not every dialect can fill every field.** sqlite reports a foreign-key
|
|
1073
|
+
* failure as the bare sentence `FOREIGN KEY constraint failed` — no name, no
|
|
1074
|
+
* column, no direction — so `constraint` is absent there and the direction is
|
|
1075
|
+
* inferred from the operation. `kind` is the field that is always right.
|
|
1076
|
+
*/
|
|
1077
|
+
export declare class ConstraintViolation extends ConstraintViolation_base {
|
|
1078
|
+
/**
|
|
1079
|
+
* A sentence built from the fields above and nothing else.
|
|
1080
|
+
*
|
|
1081
|
+
* It exists because an undeclared tagged error reaches the client through
|
|
1082
|
+
* `defectMessage`, which renders `String(error)` — and a `Schema.TaggedError`
|
|
1083
|
+
* with no `message` renders as `[object Object]`. Without this getter the
|
|
1084
|
+
* caller would get a correctly-typed error carrying no information, which is
|
|
1085
|
+
* the same dead end in a different shape.
|
|
1086
|
+
*/
|
|
1087
|
+
get message(): string;
|
|
1088
|
+
}
|
|
1089
|
+
|
|
1090
|
+
declare const ConstraintViolation_base: Schema.TaggedErrorClass<ConstraintViolation, "ConstraintViolation", {
|
|
1091
|
+
readonly _tag: Schema.tag<"ConstraintViolation">;
|
|
1092
|
+
} & {
|
|
1093
|
+
/**
|
|
1094
|
+
* Which rule fired. `foreignKey` = the row you referenced does not exist;
|
|
1095
|
+
* `foreignKeyInUse` = this row may not go, others still reference it. They
|
|
1096
|
+
* are opposite situations with opposite fixes, so a UI branches on them
|
|
1097
|
+
* separately.
|
|
1098
|
+
*/
|
|
1099
|
+
kind: Schema.Literal<["foreignKey", "foreignKeyInUse", "unique", "notNull", "check"]>;
|
|
1100
|
+
/** The table the write targeted — the framework's own name for it, not the driver's. */
|
|
1101
|
+
table: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
1102
|
+
/** Which store op was attempted: 'insert' | 'update' | 'delete' | …. */
|
|
1103
|
+
operation: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
1104
|
+
/** The constraint / index name, when the dialect names one. */
|
|
1105
|
+
constraint: Schema.optional<typeof Schema.String>;
|
|
1106
|
+
/** The column, when the dialect names one instead of (or beside) a constraint. */
|
|
1107
|
+
column: Schema.optional<typeof Schema.String>;
|
|
1108
|
+
}>;
|
|
1109
|
+
|
|
1052
1110
|
/**
|
|
1053
1111
|
* A handle to a cluster-coordinated periodic task the plugin armed via
|
|
1054
1112
|
* `PluginBindContext.scheduleCoordinated`. Keep it to `stop()` the task
|
|
@@ -1312,7 +1370,7 @@ export declare const defineEvent: <const Name extends string, Key extends Schema
|
|
|
1312
1370
|
* `'latest'` — a newer delivery supersedes a pending one; a slow subscriber
|
|
1313
1371
|
* gets the current value and is told nothing, because nothing was lost.
|
|
1314
1372
|
*
|
|
1315
|
-
* See {@link EventDeliverySemantics}. The test is "would a
|
|
1373
|
+
* See {@link EventDeliverySemantics}. The test is "would a deployment be wrong
|
|
1316
1374
|
* to miss one?" — not "is this event frequent?".
|
|
1317
1375
|
*/
|
|
1318
1376
|
readonly delivery?: EventDeliverySemantics;
|
|
@@ -1672,7 +1730,7 @@ export declare const eventAttached: Schema.Struct<{
|
|
|
1672
1730
|
* reach a state it could have had immediately, and report a "loss" that was
|
|
1673
1731
|
* never a loss.
|
|
1674
1732
|
*
|
|
1675
|
-
* The honest test: **would a
|
|
1733
|
+
* The honest test: **would a deployment be wrong to miss one?** If the next value
|
|
1676
1734
|
* supersedes it, that is `'latest'` — and it is probably state rather than an
|
|
1677
1735
|
* event at all.
|
|
1678
1736
|
*/
|
|
@@ -2025,7 +2083,7 @@ export declare interface GuardSpec<Input = unknown> {
|
|
|
2025
2083
|
* in its own tables (a `teamMembers` row, say) registers its own tuple source
|
|
2026
2084
|
* rather than copying data across; see `policyGuardResolver.ts`.
|
|
2027
2085
|
*
|
|
2028
|
-
* That paragraph is here because its absence cost a
|
|
2086
|
+
* That paragraph is here because its absence cost a deployment their access
|
|
2029
2087
|
* gate. This comment used to describe the resolver as "a future ReBAC /
|
|
2030
2088
|
* `accessPolicy()` resolver" — written before the ReBAC path shipped and
|
|
2031
2089
|
* never updated. They read the type, quoted the sentence, concluded there was
|
|
@@ -3528,7 +3586,7 @@ export declare interface QueryCacheConfig {
|
|
|
3528
3586
|
*
|
|
3529
3587
|
* `'tenant'` exists because the other two were the only options and neither
|
|
3530
3588
|
* fits an org-wide figure: `subject` recomputes it per person, and `global`
|
|
3531
|
-
* is not a cache but a cross-tenant leak. A
|
|
3589
|
+
* is not a cache but a cross-tenant leak. A deployment reported computing the
|
|
3532
3590
|
* same nine-table statistic up to 18 times for 18 employees rather than take
|
|
3533
3591
|
* the second option, which was the correct call.
|
|
3534
3592
|
*
|
|
@@ -4028,6 +4086,33 @@ declare type ServerErrorListener = (event: ServerErrorEvent) => void;
|
|
|
4028
4086
|
|
|
4029
4087
|
export declare type ServerErrorSource = 'rest' | 'aggregate' | 'subscriber' | 'reaction' | 'schedule' | 'workflow' | 'webhook' | 'startup';
|
|
4030
4088
|
|
|
4089
|
+
/**
|
|
4090
|
+
* A generated CRUD write (`crud.create` / `crud.update`) was handed a
|
|
4091
|
+
* `.serverOnly()` column in its INPUT.
|
|
4092
|
+
*
|
|
4093
|
+
* `.serverOnly()` is the WIRE-exposure axis: the column never crosses the
|
|
4094
|
+
* boundary in EITHER direction. Reads strip it; a write that accepts it is the
|
|
4095
|
+
* same violation mirrored — mass assignment of a column the schema declared the
|
|
4096
|
+
* client may not see, let alone set.
|
|
4097
|
+
*
|
|
4098
|
+
* Refused rather than silently stripped: a stripped field makes an attack
|
|
4099
|
+
* indistinguishable from a no-op and leaves an honest caller wondering why the
|
|
4100
|
+
* value it sent never landed. `columns` names what was rejected so the fix
|
|
4101
|
+
* (drop the field from the descriptor's input schema, or from the caller) is
|
|
4102
|
+
* mechanical.
|
|
4103
|
+
*/
|
|
4104
|
+
export declare class ServerOnlyColumnWrite extends ServerOnlyColumnWrite_base {
|
|
4105
|
+
}
|
|
4106
|
+
|
|
4107
|
+
declare const ServerOnlyColumnWrite_base: Schema.TaggedErrorClass<ServerOnlyColumnWrite, "ServerOnlyColumnWrite", {
|
|
4108
|
+
readonly _tag: Schema.tag<"ServerOnlyColumnWrite">;
|
|
4109
|
+
} & {
|
|
4110
|
+
/** The table the write targeted. */
|
|
4111
|
+
table: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4112
|
+
/** The `.serverOnly()` columns the input tried to set. */
|
|
4113
|
+
columns: Schema.Array$<typeof Schema.String>;
|
|
4114
|
+
}>;
|
|
4115
|
+
|
|
4031
4116
|
/**
|
|
4032
4117
|
* Publish the caller's fully-resolved scope set for this request (raw subject
|
|
4033
4118
|
* scopes ∪ role-derived scopes ∪ any extra grants). Called by the rbac
|
|
@@ -4058,6 +4143,33 @@ export declare const setResourceScopeResolver: (resolver: ResourceScopeResolver
|
|
|
4058
4143
|
*/
|
|
4059
4144
|
export declare const sourceKeys: (source: ReactivitySource | ReadonlyArray<ReactivitySource> | undefined) => ReadonlyArray<string>;
|
|
4060
4145
|
|
|
4146
|
+
/**
|
|
4147
|
+
* Discriminated union of all framework-owned store errors. Use it on
|
|
4148
|
+
* a mutation's `error:` schema when you want every kind surfaced
|
|
4149
|
+
* typed to the client.
|
|
4150
|
+
*/
|
|
4151
|
+
export declare type StoreError = TenantScopeViolation | TenantRowNotFound | ServerOnlyColumnWrite | StoreOperationFailed | TableValidationFailed | ConstraintViolation;
|
|
4152
|
+
|
|
4153
|
+
/**
|
|
4154
|
+
* Anything else the underlying `DataStore` raised during a write or
|
|
4155
|
+
* query. `cause` is the stringified original error — sufficient for
|
|
4156
|
+
* logs + UI, doesn't try to serialise complex error chains across the
|
|
4157
|
+
* rpc boundary. The `_tag` discriminator stays cheap to pattern-match.
|
|
4158
|
+
*/
|
|
4159
|
+
export declare class StoreOperationFailed extends StoreOperationFailed_base {
|
|
4160
|
+
}
|
|
4161
|
+
|
|
4162
|
+
declare const StoreOperationFailed_base: Schema.TaggedErrorClass<StoreOperationFailed, "StoreOperationFailed", {
|
|
4163
|
+
readonly _tag: Schema.tag<"StoreOperationFailed">;
|
|
4164
|
+
} & {
|
|
4165
|
+
/** Which DataStore op was attempted: 'query' | 'insert' | 'update' | 'delete' | 'hardDelete'. */
|
|
4166
|
+
operation: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4167
|
+
/** The table the op targeted. */
|
|
4168
|
+
table: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4169
|
+
/** `String(originalError)` — round-trip-safe diagnostic form. */
|
|
4170
|
+
cause: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4171
|
+
}>;
|
|
4172
|
+
|
|
4061
4173
|
export declare type StrategyResolution = {
|
|
4062
4174
|
readonly kind: 'matched';
|
|
4063
4175
|
readonly subject: Subject;
|
|
@@ -4156,7 +4268,7 @@ export declare const Subject: Schema.Union<[Schema.Struct<{
|
|
|
4156
4268
|
* Set when this caller PRESENTED a credential and it was rejected — an
|
|
4157
4269
|
* expired token above all. Absent when they presented none.
|
|
4158
4270
|
*
|
|
4159
|
-
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A
|
|
4271
|
+
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A deployment
|
|
4160
4272
|
* measured the cost: a user's tab outlived their IdP's token lifetime, the
|
|
4161
4273
|
* strategy logged `supabase jwt expired`, the caller fell through to
|
|
4162
4274
|
* anonymous, and the guard then refused with `missing required scope
|
|
@@ -4202,7 +4314,7 @@ export declare const SubjectIdentity: Schema.Union<[Schema.Struct<{
|
|
|
4202
4314
|
* Set when this caller PRESENTED a credential and it was rejected — an
|
|
4203
4315
|
* expired token above all. Absent when they presented none.
|
|
4204
4316
|
*
|
|
4205
|
-
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A
|
|
4317
|
+
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A deployment
|
|
4206
4318
|
* measured the cost: a user's tab outlived their IdP's token lifetime, the
|
|
4207
4319
|
* strategy logged `supabase jwt expired`, the caller fell through to
|
|
4208
4320
|
* anonymous, and the guard then refused with `missing required scope
|
|
@@ -4360,10 +4472,70 @@ export declare const subscriptionEvent: <D extends Schema.Schema.Any>(data: D) =
|
|
|
4360
4472
|
|
|
4361
4473
|
export declare const systemSubject: (id: string, scopes?: ReadonlyArray<string>) => Subject;
|
|
4362
4474
|
|
|
4475
|
+
/**
|
|
4476
|
+
* Pre-INSERT row validation against a table's `.validate(Schema)`
|
|
4477
|
+
* decoder failed. The MutationStore runs the table's `insertSchema`
|
|
4478
|
+
* AFTER defaults + computed + audit/tenant stamps; failure means
|
|
4479
|
+
* the stamped row didn't satisfy the decoder. `issues` is the
|
|
4480
|
+
* formatted ArrayFormatter output (cheap to render in UI, doesn't
|
|
4481
|
+
* leak the original Schema instance).
|
|
4482
|
+
*/
|
|
4483
|
+
export declare class TableValidationFailed extends TableValidationFailed_base {
|
|
4484
|
+
}
|
|
4485
|
+
|
|
4486
|
+
declare const TableValidationFailed_base: Schema.TaggedErrorClass<TableValidationFailed, "TableValidationFailed", {
|
|
4487
|
+
readonly _tag: Schema.tag<"TableValidationFailed">;
|
|
4488
|
+
} & {
|
|
4489
|
+
/** The table the row targeted. */
|
|
4490
|
+
table: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4491
|
+
/** Top-level explanation for logs + UI ("user.email failed pattern check"). */
|
|
4492
|
+
summary: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4493
|
+
/** Flat list of `{ path, message }` per failing leaf. Path uses dot-notation. */
|
|
4494
|
+
issues: Schema.Array$<Schema.Struct<{
|
|
4495
|
+
path: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4496
|
+
message: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4497
|
+
}>>;
|
|
4498
|
+
}>;
|
|
4499
|
+
|
|
4363
4500
|
export declare type Target<Input = unknown, Row = unknown> = TargetSpec<Input, Row> | ReadonlyArray<TargetSpec<Input, Row>>;
|
|
4364
4501
|
|
|
4365
4502
|
export declare type TargetSpec<Input = unknown, Row = unknown> = InsertTarget<Input, Row> | UpdateTarget<Input, Row> | DeleteTarget<Input>;
|
|
4366
4503
|
|
|
4504
|
+
/**
|
|
4505
|
+
* A keyed-by-primary-key write (`ctx.store.update(table, id, patch)`,
|
|
4506
|
+
* `delete(table, id)`, `hardDelete(table, id)`, `patchJson(table, id, …)`) on a
|
|
4507
|
+
* `tenant()`-scoped table did not resolve to a row inside the CALLER's tenant.
|
|
4508
|
+
*
|
|
4509
|
+
* **One error for two situations, on purpose.** It is raised identically when
|
|
4510
|
+
* the row does not exist at all and when it exists but belongs to another
|
|
4511
|
+
* tenant, and it carries no field that separates them. That is the whole point:
|
|
4512
|
+
*
|
|
4513
|
+
* - Reporting "forbidden" for a foreign row and "not found" for a missing one
|
|
4514
|
+
* turns any keyed write into a cross-tenant EXISTENCE ORACLE — an attacker
|
|
4515
|
+
* walks ids and learns which ones are real in someone else's tenant, which
|
|
4516
|
+
* is exactly the isolation the `tenant()` mixin exists to provide.
|
|
4517
|
+
* - Collapsing the other way — silently affecting zero rows — is worse than
|
|
4518
|
+
* either: the handler reads it as "the row is gone", not "you may not touch
|
|
4519
|
+
* it", so a genuine isolation breach shows up in an app as a confusing
|
|
4520
|
+
* absent-row branch and never as a security signal.
|
|
4521
|
+
*
|
|
4522
|
+
* So both cases fail LOUDLY and IDENTICALLY. `id` is the key the caller itself
|
|
4523
|
+
* supplied — never another tenant's data.
|
|
4524
|
+
*/
|
|
4525
|
+
export declare class TenantRowNotFound extends TenantRowNotFound_base {
|
|
4526
|
+
}
|
|
4527
|
+
|
|
4528
|
+
declare const TenantRowNotFound_base: Schema.TaggedErrorClass<TenantRowNotFound, "TenantRowNotFound", {
|
|
4529
|
+
readonly _tag: Schema.tag<"TenantRowNotFound">;
|
|
4530
|
+
} & {
|
|
4531
|
+
/** The table the keyed write targeted. */
|
|
4532
|
+
table: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4533
|
+
/** The primary key the CALLER supplied. Echoing it leaks nothing. */
|
|
4534
|
+
id: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4535
|
+
/** Human-readable explanation for diagnostics + UI. */
|
|
4536
|
+
reason: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4537
|
+
}>;
|
|
4538
|
+
|
|
4367
4539
|
/**
|
|
4368
4540
|
* The subject a `storeForTenant(id)` view runs as — the caller's identity,
|
|
4369
4541
|
* re-pointed at ONE explicit tenant.
|
|
@@ -4383,6 +4555,25 @@ export declare const tenantScopedSubject: (subject: Subject, tenantId: string) =
|
|
|
4383
4555
|
readonly type: "serviceAccount";
|
|
4384
4556
|
}>;
|
|
4385
4557
|
|
|
4558
|
+
/**
|
|
4559
|
+
* A write was attempted against a `tenant()`-scoped table, but the
|
|
4560
|
+
* authenticated subject's `tenantId` is null — either anonymous, or
|
|
4561
|
+
* an apiKey / serviceAccount without a tenant binding. Refusing the
|
|
4562
|
+
* write at the boundary is the safe default; a future "system writes"
|
|
4563
|
+
* subject type can opt out.
|
|
4564
|
+
*/
|
|
4565
|
+
export declare class TenantScopeViolation extends TenantScopeViolation_base {
|
|
4566
|
+
}
|
|
4567
|
+
|
|
4568
|
+
declare const TenantScopeViolation_base: Schema.TaggedErrorClass<TenantScopeViolation, "TenantScopeViolation", {
|
|
4569
|
+
readonly _tag: Schema.tag<"TenantScopeViolation">;
|
|
4570
|
+
} & {
|
|
4571
|
+
/** The table the violating write targeted. */
|
|
4572
|
+
table: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4573
|
+
/** Human-readable explanation for diagnostics + UI. */
|
|
4574
|
+
reason: typeof Schema.String;
|
|
4575
|
+
}>;
|
|
4576
|
+
|
|
4386
4577
|
export declare const toRpc: <Name extends string, Input extends Schema.Schema.Any, Output extends Schema.Schema.Any, Err extends Schema.Schema.All>(descriptor: QueryProcedureDescriptor<Name, Input, Output, Err> | MutationProcedureDescriptor<Name, Input, Output, Err> | ActionProcedureDescriptor<Name, Input, Output, Err> | StreamProcedureDescriptor<Name, Input, Output, Err>) => Rpc.Rpc<Name, Input extends Schema.Struct.Fields ? Schema.Struct<Input> : Input, Stream<Schema.Union<[Schema.Struct<{
|
|
4387
4578
|
_tag: Schema.Literal<["snapshot"]>;
|
|
4388
4579
|
revision: typeof Schema.Number;
|
|
@@ -4933,8 +5124,8 @@ export declare interface VoltroPlugin {
|
|
|
4933
5124
|
* is the WIDENED one. So the server judged against a narrower set than it had
|
|
4934
5125
|
* advertised, and the framework's own errors failed that judgement:
|
|
4935
5126
|
*
|
|
4936
|
-
* - a guard's `ScopeError` — reported by a
|
|
4937
|
-
* relationship-guarded mutation in
|
|
5127
|
+
* - a guard's `ScopeError` — reported by a deployment, who measured it on every
|
|
5128
|
+
* relationship-guarded mutation in a real app: a permissions refusal reached
|
|
4938
5129
|
* their client as `InternalError`, so their UI showed "something went wrong"
|
|
4939
5130
|
* where it should have shown "forbidden";
|
|
4940
5131
|
* - a cross-table `rule()`'s `BusinessRuleViolation` — unconditional for
|
package/dist/index.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -138,12 +138,12 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
138
138
|
decidedAt: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
139
139
|
note: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
140
140
|
relation: d.Literal("to-decide", "requested")
|
|
141
|
-
}), N = "channel:",
|
|
142
|
-
if (
|
|
141
|
+
}), N = "channel:", P = Symbol.for("@voltro/protocol/reactivityChannels"), Ze = globalThis, F = Ze[P] ?? (Ze[P] = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map()), Qe = /^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*(\.[a-z0-9-]+)*$/, $e = (e) => {
|
|
142
|
+
if (!Qe.test(e)) throw Error(`reactivityChannel('${e}'): invalid channel name.\n Use lowercase kebab segments separated by dots — \`presence\`, \`job-queue\`,
|
|
143
143
|
\`billing.usage\`. A \`:\` is refused because it is the namespace separator in
|
|
144
144
|
the routing key (\`${N}<name>\`), and an uppercase letter is\n refused because a key that differs only by case reads as one channel and
|
|
145
145
|
routes as two.`);
|
|
146
|
-
let t =
|
|
146
|
+
let t = F.get(e);
|
|
147
147
|
if (t !== void 0) return t;
|
|
148
148
|
let n = `${N}${e}`, r = Object.freeze({
|
|
149
149
|
kind: "reactivity-channel",
|
|
@@ -151,15 +151,15 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
151
151
|
key: n,
|
|
152
152
|
toString: () => n
|
|
153
153
|
});
|
|
154
|
-
return
|
|
155
|
-
},
|
|
156
|
-
let t =
|
|
157
|
-
for (let r of e) for (let e of
|
|
154
|
+
return F.set(e, r), r;
|
|
155
|
+
}, et = (e) => typeof e == "object" && !!e && e.kind === "reactivity-channel", tt = (e) => e.startsWith(N), nt = () => new Set([...F.values()].map((e) => e.key)), I = (e) => et(e) ? e.key : e, rt = (e) => e === void 0 ? [] : Array.isArray(e) ? e.map(I) : [I(e)], it = (e) => e === void 0 ? void 0 : Array.isArray(e) ? e.map(I) : I(e), at = (e) => {
|
|
156
|
+
let t = nt(), n = [];
|
|
157
|
+
for (let r of e) for (let e of rt(r.source)) !tt(e) || t.has(e) || n.push({
|
|
158
158
|
procedure: r.name,
|
|
159
159
|
key: e
|
|
160
160
|
});
|
|
161
161
|
return n;
|
|
162
|
-
},
|
|
162
|
+
}, ot = (e, t) => {
|
|
163
163
|
let n = e?.injectExternalChange;
|
|
164
164
|
return n !== void 0 && (n.call(e, {
|
|
165
165
|
table: t.key,
|
|
@@ -168,8 +168,8 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
168
168
|
old: {},
|
|
169
169
|
origin: "inline"
|
|
170
170
|
}), !0);
|
|
171
|
-
},
|
|
172
|
-
if (
|
|
171
|
+
}, st = (e) => e.internal !== !0, L = (e) => {
|
|
172
|
+
if (ct(e), Array.isArray(e.guards) && e.guards.length === 0) throw Error(`${e.name}: \`guards: []\` is empty, so it enforces nothing — but it reads\n at the call site as if this procedure were protected. Omit the field for an
|
|
173
173
|
unguarded procedure, or list the scopes required to call it.`);
|
|
174
174
|
let t = typeof e.source == "string" ? [e.source] : Array.isArray(e.source) ? e.source : void 0;
|
|
175
175
|
if (t !== void 0 && (t.length === 0 || t.some((e) => String(e).trim() === ""))) throw Error(`${e.name}: \`source\` is empty, so this query declares reactivity and\n subscribes to nothing — it serves one snapshot and never updates again,
|
|
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
186
186
|
let n = [e.publicApi === void 0 ? void 0 : "publicApi", e.exposeAsTool === void 0 ? void 0 : "exposeAsTool"].filter((e) => e !== void 0);
|
|
187
187
|
if (n.length === 0) return e;
|
|
188
188
|
throw Error(`${e.name}: \`internal: true\` cannot be combined with ${n.map((e) => `\`${e}\``).join(" or ")}. \`internal\` takes the procedure OFF the wire; those put it back ON a different one (${n.includes("publicApi") ? "a REST route" : "an agent tool"}), and that surface is projected without consulting the flag — so the procedure would be unreachable from your client and reachable from the internet. Drop \`internal: true\` if the wider surface is intended, or remove the ${n.join(" / ")} annotation if it is not.`);
|
|
189
|
-
},
|
|
189
|
+
}, ct = (e) => {
|
|
190
190
|
let t = e.requiresApproval;
|
|
191
191
|
if (t !== void 0) {
|
|
192
192
|
if (!Array.isArray(t.approvers) || t.approvers.length === 0) throw Error(`${e.name}: \`requiresApproval.approvers\` is empty, so NOBODY can approve this\n procedure and every call would park forever. Name the scope(s) an approver must hold
|
|
@@ -196,48 +196,48 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
196
196
|
human from every other, and the second-pair-of-eyes control would enforce nothing.
|
|
197
197
|
Give the procedure a \`guards:\` decision, or drop \`requiresApproval\`.`);
|
|
198
198
|
}
|
|
199
|
-
},
|
|
199
|
+
}, lt = (e) => e.action !== void 0 && e.resourceType !== void 0, ut = (e) => e.openAccess !== void 0 || e.guards !== void 0 && e.guards.length > 0, R = (e, t, n) => {
|
|
200
200
|
if (n === void 0) return t;
|
|
201
201
|
if (n.trim() === "") throw Error(`${e}: \`openAccess\` needs a REASON, not an empty string. It is the sentence a\n reviewer reads to decide whether this procedure should really be callable
|
|
202
202
|
without an authorization check — e.g. \`openAccess: 'public pricing, no caller data'\`.`);
|
|
203
203
|
if (t !== void 0 && t.length > 0) throw Error(`${e}: \`openAccess\` and \`guards\` are two different access decisions, so\n declaring both says the procedure is protected AND open. Keep the guards if a
|
|
204
204
|
caller must hold a scope; drop them if anyone may call it.`);
|
|
205
205
|
return [u(n.trim())];
|
|
206
|
-
},
|
|
206
|
+
}, z = (e) => L({
|
|
207
207
|
kind: "query",
|
|
208
208
|
name: e.name,
|
|
209
209
|
input: e.input,
|
|
210
210
|
output: e.output,
|
|
211
211
|
error: e.error ?? d.Never,
|
|
212
|
-
source:
|
|
212
|
+
source: it(e.source),
|
|
213
213
|
cache: e.cache,
|
|
214
|
-
guards:
|
|
214
|
+
guards: R(e.name, e.guards, e.openAccess),
|
|
215
215
|
openAccess: e.openAccess,
|
|
216
216
|
publicApi: e.publicApi,
|
|
217
217
|
exposeAsTool: e.exposeAsTool,
|
|
218
218
|
internal: e.internal,
|
|
219
219
|
overridesPlugin: e.overridesPlugin
|
|
220
|
-
}),
|
|
220
|
+
}), B = (e) => L({
|
|
221
221
|
kind: "mutation",
|
|
222
222
|
name: e.name,
|
|
223
223
|
input: e.input,
|
|
224
224
|
output: e.output,
|
|
225
225
|
error: e.error ?? d.Never,
|
|
226
226
|
target: e.target,
|
|
227
|
-
guards:
|
|
227
|
+
guards: R(e.name, e.guards, e.openAccess),
|
|
228
228
|
openAccess: e.openAccess,
|
|
229
229
|
publicApi: e.publicApi,
|
|
230
230
|
exposeAsTool: e.exposeAsTool,
|
|
231
231
|
requiresApproval: e.requiresApproval,
|
|
232
232
|
internal: e.internal,
|
|
233
233
|
overridesPlugin: e.overridesPlugin
|
|
234
|
-
}),
|
|
234
|
+
}), V = (e) => L({
|
|
235
235
|
kind: "action",
|
|
236
236
|
name: e.name,
|
|
237
237
|
input: e.input,
|
|
238
238
|
output: e.output,
|
|
239
239
|
error: e.error ?? d.Never,
|
|
240
|
-
guards:
|
|
240
|
+
guards: R(e.name, e.guards, e.openAccess),
|
|
241
241
|
openAccess: e.openAccess,
|
|
242
242
|
source: e.source,
|
|
243
243
|
target: e.target,
|
|
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
246
246
|
requiresApproval: e.requiresApproval,
|
|
247
247
|
internal: e.internal,
|
|
248
248
|
overridesPlugin: e.overridesPlugin
|
|
249
|
-
}),
|
|
249
|
+
}), dt = (e) => L({
|
|
250
250
|
kind: "stream",
|
|
251
251
|
name: e.name,
|
|
252
252
|
input: e.input,
|
|
@@ -254,42 +254,42 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
254
254
|
error: e.error ?? d.Never,
|
|
255
255
|
internal: e.internal,
|
|
256
256
|
overridesPlugin: e.overridesPlugin,
|
|
257
|
-
guards:
|
|
257
|
+
guards: R(e.name, e.guards, e.openAccess),
|
|
258
258
|
openAccess: e.openAccess
|
|
259
|
-
}),
|
|
259
|
+
}), H = (e, t) => t && t.length > 0 ? d.Union(e, ...t) : e, U = (e) => e !== void 0 && e.some((e) => !l(e)), ft = (e, t) => U(t) ? d.Union(e, c, s) : e, pt = (e) => d.Union(e, x), mt = (e, t) => t === void 0 ? e : d.Union(e, A), W = (e, t) => {
|
|
260
260
|
if (t === "stream") return e.error;
|
|
261
|
-
let n =
|
|
262
|
-
return t === "query" ? n :
|
|
263
|
-
},
|
|
264
|
-
payload: b(e.input, e.name,
|
|
261
|
+
let n = ft(e.error, e.guards);
|
|
262
|
+
return t === "query" ? n : mt(t === "mutation" ? pt(n) : n, e.requiresApproval);
|
|
263
|
+
}, ht = (e, t) => f.make(e.name, {
|
|
264
|
+
payload: b(e.input, e.name, U(e.guards)),
|
|
265
265
|
success: v(e.output),
|
|
266
|
-
error:
|
|
266
|
+
error: H(W(e, "query"), t),
|
|
267
267
|
stream: !0
|
|
268
|
+
}), gt = (e, t) => f.make(e.name, {
|
|
269
|
+
payload: b(e.input, e.name, U(e.guards)),
|
|
270
|
+
success: e.output,
|
|
271
|
+
error: H(W(e, "mutation"), t)
|
|
268
272
|
}), _t = (e, t) => f.make(e.name, {
|
|
269
|
-
payload: b(e.input, e.name,
|
|
273
|
+
payload: b(e.input, e.name, U(e.guards)),
|
|
270
274
|
success: e.output,
|
|
271
|
-
error:
|
|
275
|
+
error: H(W(e, "action"), t)
|
|
272
276
|
}), vt = (e, t) => f.make(e.name, {
|
|
273
|
-
payload: b(e.input, e.name,
|
|
274
|
-
success: e.output,
|
|
275
|
-
error: V(U(e, "action"), t)
|
|
276
|
-
}), yt = (e, t) => f.make(e.name, {
|
|
277
|
-
payload: b(e.input, e.name, H(e.guards)),
|
|
277
|
+
payload: b(e.input, e.name, U(e.guards)),
|
|
278
278
|
success: e.element,
|
|
279
|
-
error:
|
|
279
|
+
error: H(e.error, t),
|
|
280
280
|
stream: !0
|
|
281
|
-
}),
|
|
281
|
+
}), yt = (e) => {
|
|
282
282
|
if (typeof e != "object" || !e) return;
|
|
283
283
|
let t = e._tag;
|
|
284
284
|
return typeof t == "string" ? t : void 0;
|
|
285
|
-
},
|
|
285
|
+
}, bt = (e) => {
|
|
286
286
|
switch (e.kind) {
|
|
287
|
-
case "query": return
|
|
288
|
-
case "mutation": return
|
|
289
|
-
case "action": return
|
|
290
|
-
case "stream": return
|
|
287
|
+
case "query": return ht(e);
|
|
288
|
+
case "mutation": return gt(e);
|
|
289
|
+
case "action": return _t(e);
|
|
290
|
+
case "stream": return vt(e);
|
|
291
291
|
}
|
|
292
|
-
},
|
|
292
|
+
}, xt = (e) => {
|
|
293
293
|
let t = e.input, n = t === void 0 ? {} : { input: t }, r = e.output, i = r === void 0 ? {} : { output: r };
|
|
294
294
|
if (e.kind === "query") return {
|
|
295
295
|
kind: "query",
|
|
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
330
330
|
..."shapeItem" in e && e.shapeItem !== void 0 ? { shapeItem: e.shapeItem } : {}
|
|
331
331
|
}))
|
|
332
332
|
};
|
|
333
|
-
},
|
|
333
|
+
}, St = 7500, Ct = (e) => typeof e == "object" && !!e && e.kind === "event", wt = (e) => {
|
|
334
334
|
if (e.name.length === 0) throw Error("defineEvent: `name` must not be empty");
|
|
335
335
|
if (/\s/.test(e.name)) throw Error(`defineEvent("${e.name}"): \`name\` must not contain whitespace.\n The name is used as a broker subject segment. NATS refuses a subject with
|
|
336
336
|
whitespace and delivers nothing — silently, and only on that broker, so an
|
|
@@ -365,69 +365,69 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
365
365
|
webhook: e.webhook,
|
|
366
366
|
delivery: e.delivery
|
|
367
367
|
};
|
|
368
|
-
},
|
|
368
|
+
}, Tt = (e) => d.Struct({
|
|
369
369
|
_tag: d.Literal("event"),
|
|
370
370
|
origin: d.String,
|
|
371
371
|
n: d.Number,
|
|
372
372
|
emittedAt: d.Number,
|
|
373
373
|
payload: e
|
|
374
|
-
}),
|
|
374
|
+
}), Et = d.Struct({
|
|
375
375
|
_tag: d.Literal("gap"),
|
|
376
376
|
missed: d.Number,
|
|
377
377
|
reason: d.Literal("buffer", "resume")
|
|
378
|
-
}),
|
|
378
|
+
}), Dt = d.Struct({ _tag: d.Literal("attached") }), Ot = (e) => d.Union(Dt, Tt(e), Et), kt = d.Struct({
|
|
379
379
|
origin: d.String,
|
|
380
380
|
n: d.Number
|
|
381
|
-
}),
|
|
381
|
+
}), At = (e) => d.Struct({
|
|
382
382
|
key: e,
|
|
383
|
-
resume: d.optional(d.Array(
|
|
384
|
-
}),
|
|
383
|
+
resume: d.optional(d.Array(kt))
|
|
384
|
+
}), jt = (e, t) => {
|
|
385
385
|
let n = e.guards !== void 0 && e.guards.some((e) => !l(e)) ? d.Union(c, s) : d.Never, r = t && t.length > 0 ? d.Union(n, ...t) : n;
|
|
386
386
|
return f.make(e.name, {
|
|
387
|
-
payload: b(
|
|
388
|
-
success:
|
|
387
|
+
payload: b(At(e.key), e.name, U(e.guards)),
|
|
388
|
+
success: Ot(e.payload),
|
|
389
389
|
error: r,
|
|
390
390
|
stream: !0
|
|
391
391
|
});
|
|
392
|
-
},
|
|
392
|
+
}, Mt = class extends d.TaggedError()("EventPayloadInvalid", {
|
|
393
393
|
event: d.String,
|
|
394
394
|
message: d.String
|
|
395
|
-
}) {},
|
|
395
|
+
}) {}, Nt = class extends d.TaggedError()("EventKeyInvalid", {
|
|
396
396
|
event: d.String,
|
|
397
397
|
message: d.String
|
|
398
|
-
}) {},
|
|
398
|
+
}) {}, Pt = class extends d.TaggedError()("EventPayloadTooLarge", {
|
|
399
399
|
event: d.String,
|
|
400
400
|
bytes: d.Number,
|
|
401
401
|
limit: d.Number
|
|
402
|
-
}) {},
|
|
402
|
+
}) {}, Ft = (e) => {
|
|
403
403
|
if (typeof e != "object" || !e) return JSON.stringify(e) ?? "null";
|
|
404
404
|
let t = Object.entries(e).filter(([, e]) => e !== void 0).sort(([e], [t]) => e < t ? -1 : +(e > t));
|
|
405
405
|
return JSON.stringify(t);
|
|
406
|
-
},
|
|
406
|
+
}, It = "\0", Lt = (e, t, n) => [
|
|
407
407
|
e ?? "~",
|
|
408
408
|
t,
|
|
409
|
-
|
|
410
|
-
].join("\0"),
|
|
409
|
+
Ft(n)
|
|
410
|
+
].join("\0"), Rt = (e) => {
|
|
411
411
|
let [t = "~", n = "", r = ""] = e.split("\0");
|
|
412
412
|
return {
|
|
413
413
|
tenantId: t === "~" ? null : t,
|
|
414
414
|
event: n,
|
|
415
415
|
key: r
|
|
416
416
|
};
|
|
417
|
-
},
|
|
417
|
+
}, zt = (e) => e.split("\0").join(" · "), Bt = (e) => e, Vt = (e) => e, Ht = (e) => {
|
|
418
418
|
let t = e.alias?.trim(), n = e.instance?.trim(), r = t !== void 0 && t !== "" ? t : e.base;
|
|
419
419
|
return n !== void 0 && n !== "" ? `${r}#${n}` : r;
|
|
420
|
-
},
|
|
420
|
+
}, Ut = (e) => {
|
|
421
421
|
if (e.length !== 0) return (t, n) => e.reduceRight((e, t) => t(e, n), t);
|
|
422
|
-
},
|
|
422
|
+
}, Wt = (e, t) => {
|
|
423
423
|
let n = He.GenericTag(e);
|
|
424
424
|
return {
|
|
425
425
|
Tag: n,
|
|
426
426
|
Live: Ue.succeed(n, t)
|
|
427
427
|
};
|
|
428
|
-
},
|
|
428
|
+
}, Gt = (e, t, n) => {
|
|
429
429
|
if (!t) return { ok: !0 };
|
|
430
|
-
let r =
|
|
430
|
+
let r = G(n);
|
|
431
431
|
if (!r) return {
|
|
432
432
|
ok: !1,
|
|
433
433
|
reason: `cannot parse runningVersion "${n}"`
|
|
@@ -435,12 +435,12 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
435
435
|
let i = t.trim();
|
|
436
436
|
if (i === "*" || i === "") return { ok: !0 };
|
|
437
437
|
let a = i.split(/\s+/).filter((e) => e.length > 0);
|
|
438
|
-
for (let i of a) if (!
|
|
438
|
+
for (let i of a) if (!Kt(i, r)) return {
|
|
439
439
|
ok: !1,
|
|
440
440
|
reason: `plugin "${e}" requires framework ${t}, running ${n}`
|
|
441
441
|
};
|
|
442
442
|
return { ok: !0 };
|
|
443
|
-
},
|
|
443
|
+
}, G = (e) => {
|
|
444
444
|
let t = /^(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)(?:-([0-9a-zA-Z.-]+))?$/.exec(e.trim());
|
|
445
445
|
return t ? {
|
|
446
446
|
major: Number(t[1]),
|
|
@@ -448,44 +448,44 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
448
448
|
patch: Number(t[3]),
|
|
449
449
|
pre: t[4] ?? ""
|
|
450
450
|
} : null;
|
|
451
|
-
},
|
|
451
|
+
}, K = (e, t) => e.major === t.major ? e.minor === t.minor ? e.patch === t.patch ? e.pre && !t.pre ? -1 : !e.pre && t.pre ? 1 : e.pre && t.pre ? e.pre < t.pre ? -1 : +(e.pre > t.pre) : 0 : e.patch - t.patch : e.minor - t.minor : e.major - t.major, Kt = (e, t) => {
|
|
452
452
|
if (e === "*") return !0;
|
|
453
453
|
if (e.startsWith("^")) {
|
|
454
|
-
let n =
|
|
455
|
-
return !n || t.major !== n.major ? !1 :
|
|
454
|
+
let n = G(e.slice(1));
|
|
455
|
+
return !n || t.major !== n.major ? !1 : K(t, n) >= 0;
|
|
456
456
|
}
|
|
457
457
|
if (e.startsWith("~")) {
|
|
458
|
-
let n =
|
|
459
|
-
return !n || t.major !== n.major || t.minor !== n.minor ? !1 :
|
|
458
|
+
let n = G(e.slice(1));
|
|
459
|
+
return !n || t.major !== n.major || t.minor !== n.minor ? !1 : K(t, n) >= 0;
|
|
460
460
|
}
|
|
461
461
|
let n = /^(>=|<=|>|<)(.+)$/.exec(e);
|
|
462
462
|
if (n) {
|
|
463
|
-
let e = n[1], r =
|
|
463
|
+
let e = n[1], r = G(n[2]);
|
|
464
464
|
if (!r) return !1;
|
|
465
|
-
let i =
|
|
465
|
+
let i = K(t, r);
|
|
466
466
|
if (e === ">=") return i >= 0;
|
|
467
467
|
if (e === "<=") return i <= 0;
|
|
468
468
|
if (e === ">") return i > 0;
|
|
469
469
|
if (e === "<") return i < 0;
|
|
470
470
|
}
|
|
471
|
-
let r =
|
|
472
|
-
return r ?
|
|
473
|
-
},
|
|
471
|
+
let r = G(e);
|
|
472
|
+
return r ? K(t, r) === 0 : !1;
|
|
473
|
+
}, q = d.Literal("running", "succeeded", "failed", "cancelled", "suspended"), qt = d.Literal("cancel", "terminate", "abandon"), Jt = d.Struct({
|
|
474
474
|
mode: d.String,
|
|
475
475
|
dueAt: d.NullOr(d.Number),
|
|
476
476
|
retryAfterMs: d.NullOr(d.Number),
|
|
477
477
|
intentId: d.NullOr(d.String)
|
|
478
|
-
}),
|
|
478
|
+
}), Yt = d.Struct({
|
|
479
479
|
id: d.String,
|
|
480
480
|
workflowName: d.String,
|
|
481
481
|
executionId: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
482
482
|
status: d.Literal("running", "queued", "dropped", "skipped"),
|
|
483
|
-
deferral: d.optional(
|
|
484
|
-
}),
|
|
483
|
+
deferral: d.optional(Jt)
|
|
484
|
+
}), J = d.Struct({
|
|
485
485
|
id: d.String,
|
|
486
486
|
tag: d.String,
|
|
487
487
|
executionId: d.String,
|
|
488
|
-
status:
|
|
488
|
+
status: q,
|
|
489
489
|
payload: d.Unknown,
|
|
490
490
|
workflowVersion: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
491
491
|
workflowPatches: d.NullOr(d.Unknown),
|
|
@@ -500,12 +500,12 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
500
500
|
durationMs: d.NullOr(d.Number),
|
|
501
501
|
traceId: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
502
502
|
parentExecutionId: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
503
|
-
parentClosePolicy: d.NullOr(
|
|
504
|
-
}),
|
|
503
|
+
parentClosePolicy: d.NullOr(qt)
|
|
504
|
+
}), Xt = d.Struct({
|
|
505
505
|
tag: d.optional(d.String),
|
|
506
|
-
status: d.optional(
|
|
506
|
+
status: d.optional(q),
|
|
507
507
|
limit: d.optional(d.Number)
|
|
508
|
-
}),
|
|
508
|
+
}), Zt = d.Struct({
|
|
509
509
|
id: d.String,
|
|
510
510
|
runId: d.String,
|
|
511
511
|
stepName: d.String,
|
|
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
520
520
|
startedAt: d.Date,
|
|
521
521
|
completedAt: d.NullOr(d.Date),
|
|
522
522
|
durationMs: d.NullOr(d.Number)
|
|
523
|
-
}),
|
|
523
|
+
}), Qt = d.Struct({
|
|
524
524
|
id: d.String,
|
|
525
525
|
runId: d.String,
|
|
526
526
|
eventType: d.String,
|
|
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
528
528
|
occurredAt: d.Date,
|
|
529
529
|
stepName: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
530
530
|
attempt: d.NullOr(d.Number)
|
|
531
|
-
}),
|
|
531
|
+
}), $t = d.Struct({
|
|
532
532
|
id: d.String,
|
|
533
533
|
name: d.String,
|
|
534
534
|
payload: d.Unknown,
|
|
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
536
536
|
subject: d.NullOr(d.Unknown),
|
|
537
537
|
traceId: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
538
538
|
occurredAt: d.Date
|
|
539
|
-
}),
|
|
539
|
+
}), en = d.Struct({
|
|
540
540
|
id: d.String,
|
|
541
541
|
eventId: d.String,
|
|
542
542
|
eventName: d.String,
|
|
@@ -549,108 +549,146 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
549
549
|
errorMessage: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
550
550
|
createdAt: d.Date,
|
|
551
551
|
completedAt: d.NullOr(d.Date)
|
|
552
|
-
}),
|
|
552
|
+
}), tn = d.Struct({ id: d.String }), Y = d.Struct({ runId: d.String }), nn = d.Struct({
|
|
553
553
|
name: d.optional(d.String),
|
|
554
554
|
limit: d.optional(d.Number)
|
|
555
|
-
}),
|
|
555
|
+
}), rn = d.Struct({ eventId: d.String }), X = d.Struct({
|
|
556
556
|
workflowName: d.String,
|
|
557
557
|
executionId: d.String
|
|
558
|
-
}),
|
|
558
|
+
}), an = d.Struct({
|
|
559
559
|
id: d.String,
|
|
560
560
|
signalName: d.String,
|
|
561
561
|
payload: d.optional(d.Unknown)
|
|
562
|
-
}),
|
|
562
|
+
}), on = d.Struct({
|
|
563
563
|
id: d.String,
|
|
564
564
|
updateName: d.String,
|
|
565
565
|
payload: d.optional(d.Unknown),
|
|
566
566
|
timeoutMs: d.optional(d.Number)
|
|
567
|
-
}),
|
|
567
|
+
}), sn = d.Struct({
|
|
568
568
|
eventId: d.String,
|
|
569
569
|
updateId: d.String,
|
|
570
570
|
completedEventId: d.String,
|
|
571
571
|
result: d.Unknown
|
|
572
|
-
}),
|
|
572
|
+
}), cn = z({
|
|
573
573
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.run",
|
|
574
574
|
source: "_voltro_workflow_runs",
|
|
575
|
-
input:
|
|
576
|
-
output: d.Array(
|
|
577
|
-
}),
|
|
575
|
+
input: tn,
|
|
576
|
+
output: d.Array(J)
|
|
577
|
+
}), ln = z({
|
|
578
578
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.runs",
|
|
579
579
|
source: "_voltro_workflow_runs",
|
|
580
|
-
input:
|
|
581
|
-
output: d.Array(
|
|
582
|
-
}),
|
|
580
|
+
input: Xt,
|
|
581
|
+
output: d.Array(J)
|
|
582
|
+
}), un = z({
|
|
583
583
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.run.steps",
|
|
584
584
|
source: "_voltro_workflow_run_steps",
|
|
585
|
-
input:
|
|
586
|
-
output: d.Array(
|
|
587
|
-
}),
|
|
585
|
+
input: Y,
|
|
586
|
+
output: d.Array(Zt)
|
|
587
|
+
}), dn = z({
|
|
588
588
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.run.events",
|
|
589
589
|
source: "_voltro_workflow_run_events",
|
|
590
|
-
input:
|
|
591
|
-
output: d.Array(
|
|
592
|
-
}),
|
|
590
|
+
input: Y,
|
|
591
|
+
output: d.Array(Qt)
|
|
592
|
+
}), fn = z({
|
|
593
593
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.domainEvents",
|
|
594
594
|
source: "_voltro_workflow_events",
|
|
595
|
-
input:
|
|
596
|
-
output: d.Array(
|
|
597
|
-
}),
|
|
595
|
+
input: nn,
|
|
596
|
+
output: d.Array($t)
|
|
597
|
+
}), pn = z({
|
|
598
598
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.event.deliveries",
|
|
599
599
|
source: "_voltro_workflow_event_deliveries",
|
|
600
|
-
input:
|
|
601
|
-
output: d.Array(
|
|
602
|
-
}),
|
|
600
|
+
input: rn,
|
|
601
|
+
output: d.Array(en)
|
|
602
|
+
}), mn = V({
|
|
603
603
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.cancel",
|
|
604
|
-
input:
|
|
604
|
+
input: X,
|
|
605
605
|
output: d.Struct({ ok: d.Boolean })
|
|
606
|
-
}),
|
|
606
|
+
}), hn = V({
|
|
607
607
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.resume",
|
|
608
|
-
input:
|
|
608
|
+
input: X,
|
|
609
609
|
output: d.Struct({ ok: d.Boolean })
|
|
610
|
-
}),
|
|
610
|
+
}), gn = V({
|
|
611
611
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.signal",
|
|
612
|
-
input:
|
|
612
|
+
input: an,
|
|
613
613
|
output: d.Struct({ eventId: d.String })
|
|
614
|
-
}),
|
|
614
|
+
}), _n = V({
|
|
615
615
|
name: "__voltro.workflow.update",
|
|
616
|
-
input:
|
|
617
|
-
output:
|
|
618
|
-
}),
|
|
616
|
+
input: on,
|
|
617
|
+
output: sn
|
|
618
|
+
}), vn = "__voltro.undo.log", yn = "__voltro.undo.apply", bn = "__voltro.undo.redo", xn = d.Struct({
|
|
619
619
|
id: d.String,
|
|
620
620
|
tag: d.String,
|
|
621
621
|
label: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
622
622
|
undone: d.Boolean,
|
|
623
623
|
crossesAction: d.Boolean,
|
|
624
624
|
createdAt: d.String
|
|
625
|
-
}),
|
|
625
|
+
}), Sn = class extends d.TaggedError()("UndoNotFound", { invocationId: d.String }) {}, Cn = class extends d.TaggedError()("UndoForbidden", { invocationId: d.String }) {}, wn = class extends d.TaggedError()("UndoConflict", {
|
|
626
626
|
invocationId: d.String,
|
|
627
627
|
reason: d.Literal("conflict", "action")
|
|
628
|
-
}) {}, Tn = d.Union(Cn, wn
|
|
629
|
-
name:
|
|
628
|
+
}) {}, Tn = d.Union(Sn, Cn, wn), En = z({
|
|
629
|
+
name: vn,
|
|
630
630
|
source: "_voltro_undo_log",
|
|
631
631
|
input: d.Struct({ limit: d.optional(d.Number) }),
|
|
632
|
-
output: d.Array(
|
|
632
|
+
output: d.Array(xn),
|
|
633
633
|
openAccess: "subject-scoped by construction: lists only the calling subject's own undoable actions"
|
|
634
|
-
}), Dn =
|
|
635
|
-
name:
|
|
634
|
+
}), Dn = B({
|
|
635
|
+
name: yn,
|
|
636
636
|
input: d.Struct({ invocationId: d.String }),
|
|
637
637
|
output: d.Struct({ ok: d.Boolean }),
|
|
638
638
|
error: Tn,
|
|
639
639
|
openAccess: "subject-scoped by construction: undo is per-actor — another subject's invocation fails typed with UndoForbidden"
|
|
640
|
-
}), On =
|
|
641
|
-
name:
|
|
640
|
+
}), On = B({
|
|
641
|
+
name: bn,
|
|
642
642
|
input: d.Struct({ invocationId: d.String }),
|
|
643
643
|
output: d.Struct({ ok: d.Boolean }),
|
|
644
644
|
error: Tn,
|
|
645
645
|
openAccess: "subject-scoped by construction: redo is per-actor — another subject's invocation fails typed with UndoForbidden"
|
|
646
|
-
}), kn =
|
|
647
|
-
|
|
646
|
+
}), kn = class extends d.TaggedError()("TenantScopeViolation", {
|
|
647
|
+
table: d.String,
|
|
648
|
+
reason: d.String
|
|
649
|
+
}) {}, An = class extends d.TaggedError()("StoreOperationFailed", {
|
|
650
|
+
operation: d.String,
|
|
651
|
+
table: d.String,
|
|
652
|
+
cause: d.String
|
|
653
|
+
}) {}, jn = class extends d.TaggedError()("TableValidationFailed", {
|
|
654
|
+
table: d.String,
|
|
655
|
+
summary: d.String,
|
|
656
|
+
issues: d.Array(d.Struct({
|
|
657
|
+
path: d.String,
|
|
658
|
+
message: d.String
|
|
659
|
+
}))
|
|
660
|
+
}) {}, Mn = class extends d.TaggedError()("TenantRowNotFound", {
|
|
661
|
+
table: d.String,
|
|
662
|
+
id: d.String,
|
|
663
|
+
reason: d.String
|
|
664
|
+
}) {}, Nn = class extends d.TaggedError()("ServerOnlyColumnWrite", {
|
|
665
|
+
table: d.String,
|
|
666
|
+
columns: d.Array(d.String)
|
|
667
|
+
}) {}, Pn = class extends d.TaggedError()("ConstraintViolation", {
|
|
668
|
+
kind: d.Literal("foreignKey", "foreignKeyInUse", "unique", "notNull", "check"),
|
|
669
|
+
table: d.String,
|
|
670
|
+
operation: d.String,
|
|
671
|
+
constraint: d.optional(d.String),
|
|
672
|
+
column: d.optional(d.String)
|
|
673
|
+
}) {
|
|
674
|
+
get message() {
|
|
675
|
+
let e = this.constraint ?? this.column, t = e === void 0 ? `on ${this.table}` : `${e} on ${this.table}`;
|
|
676
|
+
switch (this.kind) {
|
|
677
|
+
case "foreignKey": return `foreign key ${t}: the referenced row does not exist`;
|
|
678
|
+
case "foreignKeyInUse": return `foreign key ${t}: the row is still referenced by other rows`;
|
|
679
|
+
case "unique": return `unique constraint ${t}: a row with this value already exists`;
|
|
680
|
+
case "notNull": return `not-null constraint ${t}: the column requires a value`;
|
|
681
|
+
case "check": return `check constraint ${t}: the row does not satisfy it`;
|
|
682
|
+
}
|
|
683
|
+
}
|
|
684
|
+
}, Fn = "__voltro.approvals.pending", Z = "__voltro.approvals.decide", In = z({
|
|
685
|
+
name: Fn,
|
|
648
686
|
source: "_voltro_approvals",
|
|
649
687
|
input: d.Struct({ limit: d.optional(d.Number) }),
|
|
650
688
|
output: d.Array(M),
|
|
651
689
|
openAccess: "the answer is scoped to the caller — a row appears only if they requested it or hold its recorded approver scopes, so an anonymous caller sees nothing"
|
|
652
|
-
}),
|
|
653
|
-
name:
|
|
690
|
+
}), Ln = B({
|
|
691
|
+
name: Z,
|
|
654
692
|
input: d.Struct({
|
|
655
693
|
approvalId: d.String,
|
|
656
694
|
decision: d.Literal("approve", "reject"),
|
|
@@ -662,33 +700,33 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
662
700
|
}),
|
|
663
701
|
error: j,
|
|
664
702
|
openAccess: "the approver authority is the PENDING ROW's own recorded scopes (plus an unconditional self-approval refusal), checked in-handler — a descriptor-level scope would have to be the union of every approval-requiring procedure in the app"
|
|
665
|
-
}),
|
|
703
|
+
}), Rn = "__voltro.connections.list", zn = "__voltro.connections.start", Bn = "__voltro.connections.submitToken", Vn = "__voltro.connections.disconnect", Q = d.Literal("oauth2", "pat"), Hn = d.Literal("disconnected", "connected", "expired", "revoked", "error"), Un = d.Struct({
|
|
666
704
|
connectionId: d.String,
|
|
667
|
-
kind:
|
|
705
|
+
kind: Q,
|
|
668
706
|
label: d.String,
|
|
669
|
-
status:
|
|
707
|
+
status: Hn,
|
|
670
708
|
accountId: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
671
709
|
accountLabel: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
672
710
|
scopes: d.Array(d.String),
|
|
673
711
|
expiresAt: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
674
712
|
lastError: d.NullOr(d.String),
|
|
675
713
|
connectedAt: d.NullOr(d.String)
|
|
676
|
-
}),
|
|
714
|
+
}), Wn = class extends d.TaggedError()("ConnectionNotDeclared", { connectionId: d.String }) {}, Gn = class extends d.TaggedError()("ConnectionSubjectRequired", { connectionId: d.String }) {}, Kn = class extends d.TaggedError()("ConnectionKindMismatch", {
|
|
677
715
|
connectionId: d.String,
|
|
678
|
-
expected:
|
|
679
|
-
actual:
|
|
680
|
-
}) {},
|
|
716
|
+
expected: Q,
|
|
717
|
+
actual: Q
|
|
718
|
+
}) {}, qn = class extends d.TaggedError()("ConnectionHandshakeFailed", {
|
|
681
719
|
connectionId: d.String,
|
|
682
720
|
reason: d.String,
|
|
683
721
|
transient: d.Boolean
|
|
684
|
-
}) {}, $ = d.Union(
|
|
685
|
-
name:
|
|
722
|
+
}) {}, $ = d.Union(Wn, Gn, Kn, qn), Jn = z({
|
|
723
|
+
name: Rn,
|
|
686
724
|
source: "_voltro_connections",
|
|
687
725
|
input: d.Struct({}),
|
|
688
|
-
output: d.Array(
|
|
726
|
+
output: d.Array(Un),
|
|
689
727
|
openAccess: "self-scoped read: projects the declared connections for the calling subject only (its own connect/disconnect state)"
|
|
690
|
-
}),
|
|
691
|
-
name:
|
|
728
|
+
}), Yn = V({
|
|
729
|
+
name: zn,
|
|
692
730
|
input: d.Struct({
|
|
693
731
|
connectionId: d.String,
|
|
694
732
|
redirectTo: d.optional(d.String)
|
|
@@ -699,8 +737,8 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
699
737
|
}),
|
|
700
738
|
error: $,
|
|
701
739
|
openAccess: "self-service: begins an oauth handshake that stores a credential for the calling subject only; anonymous callers fail typed with ConnectionSubjectRequired"
|
|
702
|
-
}),
|
|
703
|
-
name:
|
|
740
|
+
}), Xn = B({
|
|
741
|
+
name: Bn,
|
|
704
742
|
input: d.Struct({
|
|
705
743
|
connectionId: d.String,
|
|
706
744
|
token: d.String
|
|
@@ -708,15 +746,15 @@ var We = d.Union(d.String, d.Number), p = d.Record({
|
|
|
708
746
|
output: d.Struct({ ok: d.Boolean }),
|
|
709
747
|
error: $,
|
|
710
748
|
openAccess: "self-service: stores a pasted token as the calling subject's own credential; anonymous callers fail typed with ConnectionSubjectRequired"
|
|
711
|
-
}),
|
|
712
|
-
name:
|
|
749
|
+
}), Zn = B({
|
|
750
|
+
name: Vn,
|
|
713
751
|
input: d.Struct({ connectionId: d.String }),
|
|
714
752
|
output: d.Struct({ ok: d.Boolean }),
|
|
715
753
|
error: $,
|
|
716
754
|
openAccess: "self-service: deletes only the calling subject's own credential row for this connection"
|
|
717
|
-
}),
|
|
755
|
+
}), Qn = (e) => {
|
|
718
756
|
let t = e instanceof Date ? e.getTime() : typeof e == "number" ? e : typeof e == "string" ? new Date(e).getTime() : 0;
|
|
719
757
|
return Number.isNaN(t) ? 0 : t;
|
|
720
|
-
},
|
|
758
|
+
}, $n = 1;
|
|
721
759
|
//#endregion
|
|
722
|
-
export { Oe as ADMIN_SCOPE, Ce as APIKEY_ISSUE_ORG_SCOPE, Ee as APIKEY_ISSUE_OTHER_SCOPE, ve as APIKEY_ISSUE_SELF_SCOPE,
|
|
760
|
+
export { Oe as ADMIN_SCOPE, Ce as APIKEY_ISSUE_ORG_SCOPE, Ee as APIKEY_ISSUE_OTHER_SCOPE, ve as APIKEY_ISSUE_SELF_SCOPE, Z as APPROVALS_DECIDE_TAG, Fn as APPROVALS_PENDING_TAG, j as ApprovalDecisionErrors, A as ApprovalErrors, E as ApprovalExpired, O as ApprovalForbidden, C as ApprovalNotFound, D as ApprovalNotPending, T as ApprovalRejected, S as ApprovalRequired, w as ApprovalSelfApproval, k as ApprovalUnavailable, Ae as AuthMiddleware, x as BusinessRuleViolation, Rn as CONNECTIONS_LIST_TAG, Vn as CONNECTION_DISCONNECT_TAG, zn as CONNECTION_START_TAG, Bn as CONNECTION_SUBMIT_TOKEN_TAG, qn as ConnectionHandshakeFailed, ce as ConnectionInfo, i as ConnectionInfoMiddleware, Q as ConnectionKind, Kn as ConnectionKindMismatch, Wn as ConnectionNotDeclared, Un as ConnectionState, Hn as ConnectionStatus, Gn as ConnectionSubjectRequired, Pn as ConstraintViolation, r as DEFAULT_SCOPE_CACHE_MAX_ENTRIES, ie as DEFAULT_SCOPE_CACHE_TTL_MS, It as EVENT_ROUTE_SEP, Nt as EventKeyInvalid, Mt as EventPayloadInvalid, Pt as EventPayloadTooLarge, be as IMPERSONATION_METADATA_KEY, St as MAX_EVENT_ENVELOPE_BYTES, $n as PROTOCOL_VERSION, M as PendingApproval, N as REACTIVITY_CHANNEL_PREFIX, c as ScopeError, Nn as ServerOnlyColumnWrite, An as StoreOperationFailed, e as Subject, ye as SubjectIdentity, re as SubjectService, jn as TableValidationFailed, Mn as TenantRowNotFound, kn as TenantScopeViolation, yn as UNDO_APPLY_TAG, vn as UNDO_LOG_TAG, bn as UNDO_REDO_TAG, s as Unauthenticated, wn as UndoConflict, Cn as UndoForbidden, xn as UndoLogEntry, Sn as UndoNotFound, X as WorkflowControlInputSchema, $t as WorkflowDomainEventRowSchema, nn as WorkflowDomainEventsInputSchema, rn as WorkflowEventDeliveriesInputSchema, en as WorkflowEventDeliveryRowSchema, qt as WorkflowParentClosePolicySchema, Qt as WorkflowRunEventRowSchema, Yt as WorkflowRunHandleSchema, tn as WorkflowRunRefSchema, J as WorkflowRunRowSchema, q as WorkflowRunStatusSchema, Zt as WorkflowRunStepRowSchema, Y as WorkflowRunTableRefSchema, Xt as WorkflowRunsInputSchema, an as WorkflowSignalInputSchema, Jt as WorkflowStartDeferralSchema, on as WorkflowUpdateInputSchema, sn as WorkflowUpdateResultSchema, _t as actionToRpc, we as advisoryResourceGuardWarning, ae as anonymousSubject, Ye as applyRowPatch, a as applyScopeDecision, Ln as approvalsDecideDescriptor, In as approvalsPendingQueryDescriptor, te as assertAuthenticated, ze as beginIdempotent, Gt as checkFrameworkCompat, De as checkGuards, me as checkGuardsEffect, ne as composeAuthStrategies, Ut as composeRpcInterceptors, Zn as connectionDisconnectDescriptor, Yn as connectionStartDescriptor, Xn as connectionSubmitTokenDescriptor, Jn as connectionsListQueryDescriptor, nt as declaredReactivityChannelKeys, V as defineAction, wt as defineEvent, B as defineMutation, Bt as definePlugin, Vt as definePluginRoute, Wt as definePluginService, z as defineQuery, dt as defineStream, qe as diffRows, xe as effectiveScopes, Ft as encodeEventKey, yt as errorTag, Dt as eventAttached, Tt as eventEnvelope, Et as eventGap, kt as eventResumePoint, Lt as eventRoute, Ot as eventStreamEvent, At as eventSubscribeInput, jt as eventToRpc, Ie as failIdempotent, ke as findAdvisoryResourceGuards, Pe as finishIdempotent, zt as formatEventRoute, he as getPolicyGuardResolver, ge as getResourceScopeResolver, ut as hasAccessDecision, oe as hasCallbackRoutes, Te as hasEffectiveScope, U as hasEnforcedGuard, Se as hasScope, g as idToPath, Re as idempotencyScope, y as inputLabel, Ct as isEventDescriptor, Je as isIdKeyed, l as isOpenAccess, _e as isPolicyCheck, lt as isPolicyGuard, et as isReactivityChannel, tt as isReactivityChannelKey, Ne as isSystemSubject, st as isWireReachable, t as makeScopeCache, Be as memoryIdempotencyStore, fe as missingAccessDecision, gt as mutationToRpc, xt as normalizeDescriptor, it as normalizeSource, u as openAccessSpec, Rt as parseEventRoute, Ge as pathToId, Ht as pluginInstanceName, ot as publishReactivity, Ve as publishServerError, ht as queryToRpc, ue as rawImpersonationMark, $e as reactivityChannel, Me as requireScope, m as rowPatchOpSchema, h as rowPatchSchema, ee as scopeCacheKey, pe as setEffectiveScopes, je as setPolicyGuardResolver, se as setResourceScopeResolver, rt as sourceKeys, vt as streamToRpc, b as strictInput, le as subjectIdentity, n as subjectScopes, Le as subscribeServerErrors, v as subscriptionEvent, de as systemSubject, o as tenantScopedSubject, bt as toRpc, Qn as tsMs, at as undeclaredChannelKeys, Dn as undoApplyDescriptor, En as undoLogQueryDescriptor, On as undoRedoDescriptor, W as wireErrorUnion, mn as workflowCancelDescriptor, fn as workflowDomainEventsQueryDescriptor, pn as workflowEventDeliveriesQueryDescriptor, hn as workflowResumeDescriptor, dn as workflowRunEventsQueryDescriptor, cn as workflowRunQueryDescriptor, un as workflowRunStepsQueryDescriptor, ln as workflowRunsQueryDescriptor, gn as workflowSignalDescriptor, _n as workflowUpdateDescriptor, Fe as wsMutationIdempotencyScope };
|
package/dist/jwt.d.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ declare const Subject: Schema.Union<[Schema.Struct<{
|
|
|
286
286
|
* Set when this caller PRESENTED a credential and it was rejected — an
|
|
287
287
|
* expired token above all. Absent when they presented none.
|
|
288
288
|
*
|
|
289
|
-
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A
|
|
289
|
+
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A deployment
|
|
290
290
|
* measured the cost: a user's tab outlived their IdP's token lifetime, the
|
|
291
291
|
* strategy logged `supabase jwt expired`, the caller fell through to
|
|
292
292
|
* anonymous, and the guard then refused with `missing required scope
|
package/dist/rest.d.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ declare interface GuardSpec<Input = unknown> {
|
|
|
176
176
|
* in its own tables (a `teamMembers` row, say) registers its own tuple source
|
|
177
177
|
* rather than copying data across; see `policyGuardResolver.ts`.
|
|
178
178
|
*
|
|
179
|
-
* That paragraph is here because its absence cost a
|
|
179
|
+
* That paragraph is here because its absence cost a deployment their access
|
|
180
180
|
* gate. This comment used to describe the resolver as "a future ReBAC /
|
|
181
181
|
* `accessPolicy()` resolver" — written before the ReBAC path shipped and
|
|
182
182
|
* never updated. They read the type, quoted the sentence, concluded there was
|
|
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ declare interface QueryCacheConfig {
|
|
|
653
653
|
*
|
|
654
654
|
* `'tenant'` exists because the other two were the only options and neither
|
|
655
655
|
* fits an org-wide figure: `subject` recomputes it per person, and `global`
|
|
656
|
-
* is not a cache but a cross-tenant leak. A
|
|
656
|
+
* is not a cache but a cross-tenant leak. A deployment reported computing the
|
|
657
657
|
* same nine-table statistic up to 18 times for 18 employees rather than take
|
|
658
658
|
* the second option, which was the correct call.
|
|
659
659
|
*
|
|
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ declare const Subject: Schema.Union<[Schema.Struct<{
|
|
|
897
897
|
* Set when this caller PRESENTED a credential and it was rejected — an
|
|
898
898
|
* expired token above all. Absent when they presented none.
|
|
899
899
|
*
|
|
900
|
-
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A
|
|
900
|
+
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A deployment
|
|
901
901
|
* measured the cost: a user's tab outlived their IdP's token lifetime, the
|
|
902
902
|
* strategy logged `supabase jwt expired`, the caller fell through to
|
|
903
903
|
* anonymous, and the guard then refused with `missing required scope
|
package/dist/session.d.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ declare const Subject: Schema.Union<[Schema.Struct<{
|
|
|
284
284
|
* Set when this caller PRESENTED a credential and it was rejected — an
|
|
285
285
|
* expired token above all. Absent when they presented none.
|
|
286
286
|
*
|
|
287
|
-
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A
|
|
287
|
+
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A deployment
|
|
288
288
|
* measured the cost: a user's tab outlived their IdP's token lifetime, the
|
|
289
289
|
* strategy logged `supabase jwt expired`, the caller fell through to
|
|
290
290
|
* anonymous, and the guard then refused with `missing required scope
|
|
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ declare const SubjectIdentity: Schema.Union<[Schema.Struct<{
|
|
|
330
330
|
* Set when this caller PRESENTED a credential and it was rejected — an
|
|
331
331
|
* expired token above all. Absent when they presented none.
|
|
332
332
|
*
|
|
333
|
-
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A
|
|
333
|
+
* The two are the same Subject and must not be the same ANSWER. A deployment
|
|
334
334
|
* measured the cost: a user's tab outlived their IdP's token lifetime, the
|
|
335
335
|
* strategy logged `supabase jwt expired`, the caller fell through to
|
|
336
336
|
* anonymous, and the guard then refused with `missing required scope
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@voltro/protocol",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.43.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "The Voltro wire + plugin contract — defineQuery/Mutation/Action/Stream, definePlugin, sessions / JWT / API-keys, and the RPC protocol.",
|
|
5
5
|
"keywords": [
|
|
6
6
|
"voltro",
|
|
@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@
|
|
|
54
54
|
},
|
|
55
55
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
56
56
|
"@effect/sql": "^0.52.0",
|
|
57
|
-
"@voltro/database": "0.
|
|
58
|
-
"@voltro/logger": "0.
|
|
57
|
+
"@voltro/database": "0.43.0",
|
|
58
|
+
"@voltro/logger": "0.43.0",
|
|
59
59
|
"jose": "^6.2.8"
|
|
60
60
|
},
|
|
61
61
|
"peerDependencies": {
|