@voltro/plan 0.85.0 → 0.86.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +666 -0
- package/THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md +1 -1
- package/dist/canonical.js +118 -0
- package/dist/closure.js +116 -0
- package/dist/diagnostics.js +8 -0
- package/dist/envelope.js +16 -0
- package/dist/evidence.js +76 -0
- package/dist/ids.js +25 -0
- package/dist/impact.js +65 -0
- package/dist/index.js +14 -1034
- package/dist/lint.js +273 -0
- package/dist/manifest.js +16 -0
- package/dist/next.js +64 -0
- package/dist/schema.js +216 -0
- package/dist/state.js +67 -0
- package/dist/status.js +35 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
package/dist/index.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,1034 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
import {
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
closureRun: RegExp(`^CLR-${e}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{3}$`),
|
|
16
|
-
certificate: RegExp(`^CRT-${e}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{3}$`)
|
|
17
|
-
};
|
|
18
|
-
}, o = (e) => {
|
|
19
|
-
let t = /-(?:PLAN-)?([0-9]{2})(?:-|$)/.exec(e);
|
|
20
|
-
return t === null ? null : t[1];
|
|
21
|
-
}, s = (e, t) => {
|
|
22
|
-
let n = RegExp(`(?:^|-)(${e.prefix}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{3})(?:-|$)`).exec(t);
|
|
23
|
-
return n === null ? null : n[1];
|
|
24
|
-
}, c = (e) => JSON.stringify(l(e)), l = (e) => {
|
|
25
|
-
if (Array.isArray(e)) return e.map(l);
|
|
26
|
-
if (typeof e == "object" && e) {
|
|
27
|
-
let t = {};
|
|
28
|
-
for (let n of Object.keys(e).sort()) {
|
|
29
|
-
let r = e[n];
|
|
30
|
-
r !== void 0 && (t[n] = l(r));
|
|
31
|
-
}
|
|
32
|
-
return t;
|
|
33
|
-
}
|
|
34
|
-
return e;
|
|
35
|
-
}, u = new Uint32Array([
|
|
36
|
-
1116352408,
|
|
37
|
-
1899447441,
|
|
38
|
-
3049323471,
|
|
39
|
-
3921009573,
|
|
40
|
-
961987163,
|
|
41
|
-
1508970993,
|
|
42
|
-
2453635748,
|
|
43
|
-
2870763221,
|
|
44
|
-
3624381080,
|
|
45
|
-
310598401,
|
|
46
|
-
607225278,
|
|
47
|
-
1426881987,
|
|
48
|
-
1925078388,
|
|
49
|
-
2162078206,
|
|
50
|
-
2614888103,
|
|
51
|
-
3248222580,
|
|
52
|
-
3835390401,
|
|
53
|
-
4022224774,
|
|
54
|
-
264347078,
|
|
55
|
-
604807628,
|
|
56
|
-
770255983,
|
|
57
|
-
1249150122,
|
|
58
|
-
1555081692,
|
|
59
|
-
1996064986,
|
|
60
|
-
2554220882,
|
|
61
|
-
2821834349,
|
|
62
|
-
2952996808,
|
|
63
|
-
3210313671,
|
|
64
|
-
3336571891,
|
|
65
|
-
3584528711,
|
|
66
|
-
113926993,
|
|
67
|
-
338241895,
|
|
68
|
-
666307205,
|
|
69
|
-
773529912,
|
|
70
|
-
1294757372,
|
|
71
|
-
1396182291,
|
|
72
|
-
1695183700,
|
|
73
|
-
1986661051,
|
|
74
|
-
2177026350,
|
|
75
|
-
2456956037,
|
|
76
|
-
2730485921,
|
|
77
|
-
2820302411,
|
|
78
|
-
3259730800,
|
|
79
|
-
3345764771,
|
|
80
|
-
3516065817,
|
|
81
|
-
3600352804,
|
|
82
|
-
4094571909,
|
|
83
|
-
275423344,
|
|
84
|
-
430227734,
|
|
85
|
-
506948616,
|
|
86
|
-
659060556,
|
|
87
|
-
883997877,
|
|
88
|
-
958139571,
|
|
89
|
-
1322822218,
|
|
90
|
-
1537002063,
|
|
91
|
-
1747873779,
|
|
92
|
-
1955562222,
|
|
93
|
-
2024104815,
|
|
94
|
-
2227730452,
|
|
95
|
-
2361852424,
|
|
96
|
-
2428436474,
|
|
97
|
-
2756734187,
|
|
98
|
-
3204031479,
|
|
99
|
-
3329325298
|
|
100
|
-
]), d = (e) => {
|
|
101
|
-
let t = new TextEncoder().encode(e), n = t.length * 8, r = new Uint8Array(t.length + 9 + 63 >> 6 << 6);
|
|
102
|
-
r.set(t), r[t.length] = 128;
|
|
103
|
-
let i = new DataView(r.buffer);
|
|
104
|
-
i.setUint32(r.length - 8, Math.floor(n / 4294967296)), i.setUint32(r.length - 4, n >>> 0);
|
|
105
|
-
let a = new Uint32Array([
|
|
106
|
-
1779033703,
|
|
107
|
-
3144134277,
|
|
108
|
-
1013904242,
|
|
109
|
-
2773480762,
|
|
110
|
-
1359893119,
|
|
111
|
-
2600822924,
|
|
112
|
-
528734635,
|
|
113
|
-
1541459225
|
|
114
|
-
]), o = /* @__PURE__ */ new Uint32Array(64), s = (e, t) => e >>> t | e << 32 - t;
|
|
115
|
-
for (let e = 0; e < r.length; e += 64) {
|
|
116
|
-
for (let t = 0; t < 16; t++) o[t] = i.getUint32(e + t * 4);
|
|
117
|
-
for (let e = 16; e < 64; e++) {
|
|
118
|
-
let t = s(o[e - 15], 7) ^ s(o[e - 15], 18) ^ o[e - 15] >>> 3, n = s(o[e - 2], 17) ^ s(o[e - 2], 19) ^ o[e - 2] >>> 10;
|
|
119
|
-
o[e] = o[e - 16] + t + o[e - 7] + n >>> 0;
|
|
120
|
-
}
|
|
121
|
-
let [t, n, r, c, l, d, f, p] = [
|
|
122
|
-
a[0],
|
|
123
|
-
a[1],
|
|
124
|
-
a[2],
|
|
125
|
-
a[3],
|
|
126
|
-
a[4],
|
|
127
|
-
a[5],
|
|
128
|
-
a[6],
|
|
129
|
-
a[7]
|
|
130
|
-
];
|
|
131
|
-
for (let e = 0; e < 64; e++) {
|
|
132
|
-
let i = p + (s(l, 6) ^ s(l, 11) ^ s(l, 25)) + (l & d ^ ~l & f) + u[e] + o[e] >>> 0, a = (s(t, 2) ^ s(t, 13) ^ s(t, 22)) + (t & n ^ t & r ^ n & r) >>> 0;
|
|
133
|
-
p = f, f = d, d = l, l = c + i >>> 0, c = r, r = n, n = t, t = i + a >>> 0;
|
|
134
|
-
}
|
|
135
|
-
a[0] = a[0] + t >>> 0, a[1] = a[1] + n >>> 0, a[2] = a[2] + r >>> 0, a[3] = a[3] + c >>> 0, a[4] = a[4] + l >>> 0, a[5] = a[5] + d >>> 0, a[6] = a[6] + f >>> 0, a[7] = a[7] + p >>> 0;
|
|
136
|
-
}
|
|
137
|
-
return [...a].map((e) => e.toString(16).padStart(8, "0")).join("");
|
|
138
|
-
}, f = (e) => `sha256:${d(c(e))}`, p = n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isMinLength(1))), m = n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isPattern(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}(:\d{2}(\.\d+)?)?(Z|[+-]\d{2}:\d{2})$/))), h = n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isPattern(/^sha256:[a-f0-9]{64}$/))), g = (e) => n.Array(e).pipe(n.check(n.makeFilter((e) => new Set(e).size === e.length || "items are listed twice"))), _ = (e) => n.Array(e).pipe(n.check(n.isMinLength(1))), v = n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isPattern(/^[a-z0-9]+(?:[.:/-][a-z0-9]+)*$/))), y = [
|
|
139
|
-
"proposed",
|
|
140
|
-
"ready",
|
|
141
|
-
"active",
|
|
142
|
-
"blocked",
|
|
143
|
-
"verified",
|
|
144
|
-
"closed"
|
|
145
|
-
], b = [
|
|
146
|
-
"proposed",
|
|
147
|
-
"decomposing",
|
|
148
|
-
"ready",
|
|
149
|
-
"active",
|
|
150
|
-
"verifying",
|
|
151
|
-
"closure-1",
|
|
152
|
-
"closure-2",
|
|
153
|
-
"complete"
|
|
154
|
-
], x = [
|
|
155
|
-
"commit",
|
|
156
|
-
"typecheck",
|
|
157
|
-
"unit-test",
|
|
158
|
-
"integration-test",
|
|
159
|
-
"e2e",
|
|
160
|
-
"browser",
|
|
161
|
-
"schema",
|
|
162
|
-
"migration",
|
|
163
|
-
"roundtrip",
|
|
164
|
-
"documentation",
|
|
165
|
-
"agent-guide",
|
|
166
|
-
"template",
|
|
167
|
-
"security",
|
|
168
|
-
"privacy",
|
|
169
|
-
"accessibility",
|
|
170
|
-
"rights",
|
|
171
|
-
"operations",
|
|
172
|
-
"performance",
|
|
173
|
-
"research",
|
|
174
|
-
"review",
|
|
175
|
-
"artifact"
|
|
176
|
-
], ee = [
|
|
177
|
-
"P0",
|
|
178
|
-
"P1",
|
|
179
|
-
"P2",
|
|
180
|
-
"P3"
|
|
181
|
-
], S = [
|
|
182
|
-
"architecture",
|
|
183
|
-
"feature",
|
|
184
|
-
"framework",
|
|
185
|
-
"integration",
|
|
186
|
-
"migration",
|
|
187
|
-
"operations",
|
|
188
|
-
"security",
|
|
189
|
-
"documentation",
|
|
190
|
-
"research",
|
|
191
|
-
"tooling"
|
|
192
|
-
], C = (e) => n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isPattern(e))), w = (e) => {
|
|
193
|
-
let t = e.grammar, r = g(C(t.evidence)), i = n.Struct({
|
|
194
|
-
id: C(t.source),
|
|
195
|
-
uri: p,
|
|
196
|
-
locator: p,
|
|
197
|
-
excerpt: p,
|
|
198
|
-
lineHint: n.optional(n.Int.pipe(n.check(n.isGreaterThanOrEqualTo(1)))),
|
|
199
|
-
contentHash: h,
|
|
200
|
-
disposition: n.Literals([
|
|
201
|
-
"owned-by",
|
|
202
|
-
"referenced-by",
|
|
203
|
-
"decision",
|
|
204
|
-
"non-goal"
|
|
205
|
-
]),
|
|
206
|
-
targetId: n.optional(n.Union([C(t.workItem), C(t.adr)]))
|
|
207
|
-
}), a = n.Struct({
|
|
208
|
-
id: C(t.acceptance),
|
|
209
|
-
statement: p,
|
|
210
|
-
status: n.Literals([
|
|
211
|
-
"pending",
|
|
212
|
-
"passed",
|
|
213
|
-
"failed"
|
|
214
|
-
]),
|
|
215
|
-
evidenceRefs: r
|
|
216
|
-
}), o = n.Struct({
|
|
217
|
-
rationale: p,
|
|
218
|
-
reviewer: p,
|
|
219
|
-
expiresAt: m,
|
|
220
|
-
compensatingControl: p
|
|
221
|
-
}), s = n.Struct({
|
|
222
|
-
id: C(t.requirement),
|
|
223
|
-
statement: p,
|
|
224
|
-
kinds: _(n.Literals(x)),
|
|
225
|
-
status: n.Literals([
|
|
226
|
-
"open",
|
|
227
|
-
"satisfied",
|
|
228
|
-
"waived"
|
|
229
|
-
]),
|
|
230
|
-
evidenceRefs: r,
|
|
231
|
-
waiver: n.optional(o)
|
|
232
|
-
}), c = n.Struct({
|
|
233
|
-
capabilities: n.Array(p),
|
|
234
|
-
journeys: n.Array(p),
|
|
235
|
-
adrs: g(C(t.adr)),
|
|
236
|
-
risks: n.Array(p),
|
|
237
|
-
relatedTo: g(C(t.workItem))
|
|
238
|
-
}), l = n.Struct({
|
|
239
|
-
reason: p,
|
|
240
|
-
owner: p,
|
|
241
|
-
nextAction: p,
|
|
242
|
-
recheckTrigger: p,
|
|
243
|
-
since: m
|
|
244
|
-
}), u = n.Struct({
|
|
245
|
-
from: n.NullOr(n.Literals(y)),
|
|
246
|
-
to: n.Literals(y),
|
|
247
|
-
reason: p,
|
|
248
|
-
actor: p,
|
|
249
|
-
at: m,
|
|
250
|
-
evidenceRefs: r
|
|
251
|
-
}), d = n.Struct({
|
|
252
|
-
id: C(t.workItem),
|
|
253
|
-
title: p,
|
|
254
|
-
ownerPlan: C(t.plan),
|
|
255
|
-
slice: p,
|
|
256
|
-
kind: n.Literals(S),
|
|
257
|
-
priority: n.Literals(ee),
|
|
258
|
-
mandatory: n.Boolean,
|
|
259
|
-
status: n.Literals(y),
|
|
260
|
-
owners: n.Array(p),
|
|
261
|
-
repos: _(n.Literals(e.repos)),
|
|
262
|
-
sourceRefs: _(i),
|
|
263
|
-
dependsOn: g(C(t.workItem)),
|
|
264
|
-
links: c,
|
|
265
|
-
acceptance: _(a),
|
|
266
|
-
evidenceRequirements: _(s),
|
|
267
|
-
evidenceRefs: r,
|
|
268
|
-
impactTags: _(v),
|
|
269
|
-
statusHistory: _(u),
|
|
270
|
-
blocker: n.optional(l),
|
|
271
|
-
supersededBy: n.optional(C(t.workItem)),
|
|
272
|
-
createdAt: m,
|
|
273
|
-
updatedAt: m
|
|
274
|
-
}), f = n.Struct({
|
|
275
|
-
id: C(t.plan),
|
|
276
|
-
number: n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isPattern(/^[0-9]{2}$/))),
|
|
277
|
-
title: p,
|
|
278
|
-
source: p,
|
|
279
|
-
sourceRevision: h,
|
|
280
|
-
status: n.Literals(b),
|
|
281
|
-
decompositionComplete: n.Boolean,
|
|
282
|
-
updatedAt: m
|
|
283
|
-
}), w = n.Struct({
|
|
284
|
-
rulesVersion: p,
|
|
285
|
-
sourceRevision: h,
|
|
286
|
-
blockKinds: n.Array(p),
|
|
287
|
-
extractedAt: m
|
|
288
|
-
}), T = n.Struct({
|
|
289
|
-
extractedSources: n.Int,
|
|
290
|
-
disposedSources: n.Int,
|
|
291
|
-
unmatchedSources: n.Int,
|
|
292
|
-
duplicateSources: n.Int,
|
|
293
|
-
sourceIdsHash: h,
|
|
294
|
-
result: n.Literals(["complete", "incomplete"])
|
|
295
|
-
});
|
|
296
|
-
return n.Struct({
|
|
297
|
-
schemaVersion: n.Literal(e.instanceVersion),
|
|
298
|
-
plan: f,
|
|
299
|
-
extraction: w,
|
|
300
|
-
workItems: n.Array(d),
|
|
301
|
-
coverage: T
|
|
302
|
-
});
|
|
303
|
-
}, T = (e) => n.Struct({
|
|
304
|
-
id: C(e.grammar.evidence),
|
|
305
|
-
kind: n.Literals(x),
|
|
306
|
-
title: p,
|
|
307
|
-
uri: p,
|
|
308
|
-
fingerprint: n.optional(h),
|
|
309
|
-
result: n.Literals([
|
|
310
|
-
"passed",
|
|
311
|
-
"failed",
|
|
312
|
-
"informational"
|
|
313
|
-
]),
|
|
314
|
-
subjectRefs: n.Array(p),
|
|
315
|
-
command: n.optional(p),
|
|
316
|
-
environment: n.optional(p),
|
|
317
|
-
producedBy: p,
|
|
318
|
-
reviewedBy: n.optional(p),
|
|
319
|
-
observedAt: m,
|
|
320
|
-
idempotencyKey: n.optional(p)
|
|
321
|
-
}), E = (e) => n.Struct({
|
|
322
|
-
id: C(e.grammar.finding),
|
|
323
|
-
title: p,
|
|
324
|
-
severity: n.Literals([
|
|
325
|
-
"critical",
|
|
326
|
-
"high",
|
|
327
|
-
"medium",
|
|
328
|
-
"low"
|
|
329
|
-
]),
|
|
330
|
-
status: n.Literals([
|
|
331
|
-
"open",
|
|
332
|
-
"resolved",
|
|
333
|
-
"accepted-risk"
|
|
334
|
-
]),
|
|
335
|
-
source: n.Literals([
|
|
336
|
-
"contract-reconciliation",
|
|
337
|
-
"adversarial-audit",
|
|
338
|
-
"test",
|
|
339
|
-
"incident",
|
|
340
|
-
"research",
|
|
341
|
-
"review",
|
|
342
|
-
"production"
|
|
343
|
-
]),
|
|
344
|
-
targetWorkItems: _(C(e.grammar.workItem)),
|
|
345
|
-
impactTags: n.Array(p),
|
|
346
|
-
evidenceRefs: n.optional(g(C(e.grammar.evidence))),
|
|
347
|
-
openedAt: m,
|
|
348
|
-
resolvedAt: n.optional(m)
|
|
349
|
-
}), D = {
|
|
350
|
-
security: 0,
|
|
351
|
-
error: 1,
|
|
352
|
-
warning: 2
|
|
353
|
-
}, O = (e, t) => (e ?? "") < (t ?? "") ? -1 : +((e ?? "") > (t ?? "")), te = (e) => [...e].sort((e, t) => D[e.severity] - D[t.severity] || O(e.locator.plan, t.locator.plan) || O(e.locator.workItem, t.locator.workItem) || O(e.ruleId, t.ruleId) || O(e.locator.file, t.locator.file) || O(e.locator.path, t.locator.path) || O(e.message, t.message)), ne = (e, t = !1) => e.some((e) => e.severity !== "warning" || t), k = {
|
|
354
|
-
proposed: ["ready", "blocked"],
|
|
355
|
-
ready: [
|
|
356
|
-
"active",
|
|
357
|
-
"blocked",
|
|
358
|
-
"proposed"
|
|
359
|
-
],
|
|
360
|
-
active: [
|
|
361
|
-
"blocked",
|
|
362
|
-
"verified",
|
|
363
|
-
"ready"
|
|
364
|
-
],
|
|
365
|
-
blocked: [
|
|
366
|
-
"proposed",
|
|
367
|
-
"ready",
|
|
368
|
-
"active"
|
|
369
|
-
],
|
|
370
|
-
verified: ["closed", "active"],
|
|
371
|
-
closed: ["active"]
|
|
372
|
-
}, A = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(["verified", "closed"]), j = (e, t) => {
|
|
373
|
-
let n = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
|
|
374
|
-
for (let e of t) if (e.status === "open") for (let t of e.targetWorkItems) {
|
|
375
|
-
let r = n.get(t);
|
|
376
|
-
r === void 0 ? n.set(t, [e]) : r.push(e);
|
|
377
|
-
}
|
|
378
|
-
let r = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
|
|
379
|
-
for (let t of e) for (let e of new Set(t.subjectRefs)) {
|
|
380
|
-
let n = r.get(e);
|
|
381
|
-
n === void 0 ? r.set(e, [t]) : n.push(t);
|
|
382
|
-
}
|
|
383
|
-
return {
|
|
384
|
-
evidence: new Map(e.map((e) => [e.id, e])),
|
|
385
|
-
bySubject: r,
|
|
386
|
-
openFindings: n
|
|
387
|
-
};
|
|
388
|
-
}, M = (e, t, n, r) => e.result === "passed" && e.subjectRefs.includes(n) && (r === void 0 || r.includes(e.kind)) && Date.parse(e.observedAt) >= Date.parse(t.updatedAt), N = (e, t, n, r) => {
|
|
389
|
-
let i = [], a = t.bySubject.get(e.id) ?? [], o;
|
|
390
|
-
if (e.acceptance.length > 4 || e.acceptance.length + e.evidenceRequirements.length > 4 && e.acceptance.length + e.evidenceRequirements.filter((e) => e.status !== "waived").length > 4) {
|
|
391
|
-
let t = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([...e.acceptance.map((e) => e.id), ...e.evidenceRequirements.filter((e) => e.status !== "waived").map((e) => e.id)]);
|
|
392
|
-
o = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
|
|
393
|
-
let n = Date.parse(e.updatedAt);
|
|
394
|
-
for (let e of a) if (e.result === "passed" && Date.parse(e.observedAt) >= n) for (let n of e.subjectRefs) {
|
|
395
|
-
if (!t.has(n)) continue;
|
|
396
|
-
let r = o.get(n);
|
|
397
|
-
r === void 0 ? o.set(n, /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([e.kind])) : r.add(e.kind);
|
|
398
|
-
}
|
|
399
|
-
}
|
|
400
|
-
let s = (t, n) => {
|
|
401
|
-
if (o === void 0) return a.some((r) => M(r, e, t, n));
|
|
402
|
-
let r = o.get(t);
|
|
403
|
-
return r !== void 0 && (n === void 0 || n.some((e) => r.has(e)));
|
|
404
|
-
}, c = (n, r) => n.some((n) => {
|
|
405
|
-
let i = t.evidence.get(n);
|
|
406
|
-
return i !== void 0 && M(i, e, e.id, r);
|
|
407
|
-
});
|
|
408
|
-
for (let t of e.acceptance) !s(t.id) && !(t.status === "passed" && c(t.evidenceRefs)) && i.push(`acceptance ${t.id} has no passing evidence`);
|
|
409
|
-
for (let t of e.evidenceRequirements) t.status === "waived" ? (t.waiver === void 0 || Date.parse(t.waiver.expiresAt) <= r.now().getTime()) && i.push(`the waiver of ${t.id} has expired`) : !s(t.id, t.kinds) && !c(t.evidenceRefs, t.kinds) && i.push(`requirement ${t.id} has no passing ${t.kinds.join("/")} evidence`);
|
|
410
|
-
for (let n of t.openFindings.get(e.id) ?? []) i.push(`finding ${n.id} is open`);
|
|
411
|
-
for (let t of e.dependsOn) {
|
|
412
|
-
let e = n(t);
|
|
413
|
-
e !== "verified" && e !== "closed" && i.push(`dependency ${t} is ${e ?? "missing"}`);
|
|
414
|
-
}
|
|
415
|
-
return i;
|
|
416
|
-
}, P = (e, t) => t.length === 0 ? "verified" : A.has(e.status) ? "active" : e.status, F = "voltro-plan-closure/v1", I = n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isMinLength(1))), L = n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isPattern(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}(:\d{2}(\.\d+)?)?(Z|[+-]\d{2}:\d{2})$/))), R = n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isPattern(/^sha256:[a-f0-9]{64}$/))), z = (e) => {
|
|
417
|
-
let t = e.grammar, r = (e) => n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isPattern(e))), i = n.Struct({
|
|
418
|
-
id: r(t.closureRun),
|
|
419
|
-
pass: n.Literals(["contract", "adversarial"]),
|
|
420
|
-
reviewer: I,
|
|
421
|
-
reviewContext: I,
|
|
422
|
-
planRevision: R,
|
|
423
|
-
completedAt: L,
|
|
424
|
-
findingRefs: n.Array(r(t.finding)),
|
|
425
|
-
result: n.Literals(["passed", "findings"]),
|
|
426
|
-
toolVersion: I
|
|
427
|
-
}), a = n.Struct({
|
|
428
|
-
id: r(t.certificate),
|
|
429
|
-
plan: r(t.plan),
|
|
430
|
-
planRevision: R,
|
|
431
|
-
workItems: n.Array(r(t.workItem)),
|
|
432
|
-
evidenceRefs: n.Array(r(t.evidence)),
|
|
433
|
-
closureRuns: n.Array(r(t.closureRun)).pipe(n.check(n.isBetweenLength(2, 2))),
|
|
434
|
-
confirmedBy: I,
|
|
435
|
-
issuedAt: L,
|
|
436
|
-
toolVersion: I
|
|
437
|
-
});
|
|
438
|
-
return n.Struct({
|
|
439
|
-
schemaVersion: n.Literal(F),
|
|
440
|
-
plan: r(t.plan),
|
|
441
|
-
runs: n.Array(i),
|
|
442
|
-
certificates: n.Array(a)
|
|
443
|
-
});
|
|
444
|
-
}, B = (e, t, n, r = () => void 0, i = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map()) => {
|
|
445
|
-
let a = new Set(e.workItems.map((e) => e.id));
|
|
446
|
-
return f({
|
|
447
|
-
instance: e,
|
|
448
|
-
dependencies: [...new Set(e.workItems.flatMap((e) => e.dependsOn).filter((e) => !a.has(e)))].sort().map((e) => {
|
|
449
|
-
let t = r(e);
|
|
450
|
-
return [e, t === "closed" ? "verified" : t ?? "missing"];
|
|
451
|
-
}),
|
|
452
|
-
decisions: [...new Set(e.workItems.flatMap((e) => e.links.adrs))].sort().map((e) => [e, i.get(e) ?? null]),
|
|
453
|
-
evidence: t.filter((e) => e.subjectRefs.some((e) => a.has(e))).map((e) => e.id).sort(),
|
|
454
|
-
findings: n.filter((e) => e.targetWorkItems.some((e) => a.has(e))).map((e) => [e.id, e.status]).sort()
|
|
455
|
-
});
|
|
456
|
-
}, V = (e, t) => {
|
|
457
|
-
if (e === void 0) return { state: "open" };
|
|
458
|
-
let n = new Map(e.runs.map((e) => [e.id, e])), r = [...e.certificates].reverse().find((e) => e.planRevision === t && e.closureRuns.every((e) => n.get(e)?.result === "passed" && n.get(e)?.planRevision === t));
|
|
459
|
-
if (r !== void 0) return {
|
|
460
|
-
state: "certified",
|
|
461
|
-
certificate: r
|
|
462
|
-
};
|
|
463
|
-
let i = [...e.runs].reverse().find((e) => e.pass === "contract" && e.result === "passed" && e.planRevision === t);
|
|
464
|
-
return i === void 0 ? { state: "open" } : {
|
|
465
|
-
state: "closure-1",
|
|
466
|
-
run: i
|
|
467
|
-
};
|
|
468
|
-
}, H = (e, t, n, r) => ({
|
|
469
|
-
outcome: "refused",
|
|
470
|
-
diagnostic: {
|
|
471
|
-
ruleId: e,
|
|
472
|
-
severity: "error",
|
|
473
|
-
message: t,
|
|
474
|
-
locator: { plan: r },
|
|
475
|
-
related: [],
|
|
476
|
-
nextAction: n
|
|
477
|
-
}
|
|
478
|
-
}), U = (e, t) => `${e}${String(Math.max(0, ...t.filter((t) => t.startsWith(e)).map((t) => Number(t.slice(e.length)))) + 1).padStart(3, "0")}`, re = (e, t, n, r, i, a, o, s) => {
|
|
479
|
-
let c = t.plan.id, l = t.workItems.filter((e) => e.mandatory && e.supersededBy === void 0), u = l.filter((e) => i(e.id) !== "verified" && i(e.id) !== "closed");
|
|
480
|
-
if (s.findings.length === 0 && u.length > 0) return H("closure/unverified-items", `${u.length} of ${l.length} mandatory items of ${c} are not verified (${u.slice(0, 3).map((e) => e.id).join(", ")}${u.length > 3 ? ", …" : ""})`, "Verify every mandatory item first: voltro plan status, voltro plan evidence add.", c);
|
|
481
|
-
let d = new Set(t.workItems.map((e) => e.id)), f = o.filter((e) => e.status === "open" && e.targetWorkItems.some((e) => d.has(e)));
|
|
482
|
-
for (let e of s.findings) if (!f.some((t) => t.id === e)) return H("closure/unknown-finding", `${e} is not an open finding against ${c}`, "Record the finding first, against the items it concerns.", c);
|
|
483
|
-
if (s.findings.length === 0 && f.length > 0) return H("closure/open-findings", `${f.length} finding(s) against ${c} are open (${f.map((e) => e.id).slice(0, 3).join(", ")})`, "Resolve them or accept the risk; then close again.", c);
|
|
484
|
-
let p = n?.runs ?? [];
|
|
485
|
-
if (s.pass === "adversarial" && s.findings.length === 0) {
|
|
486
|
-
let e = [...p].reverse().find((e) => e.pass === "contract" && e.result === "passed" && e.planRevision === r);
|
|
487
|
-
if (e === void 0) return H("closure/order", `${c} has no passed contract pass on its current revision`, "Run the contract pass first: voltro plan close <plan> --pass contract.", c);
|
|
488
|
-
if (e.reviewer === s.reviewer || e.reviewContext === s.reviewContext) return H("closure/same-context", `the adversarial pass needs another reviewer and another context than ${e.id} (${e.reviewer}, ${e.reviewContext})`, "Have someone else audit it, in their own context.", c);
|
|
489
|
-
}
|
|
490
|
-
let m = t.plan.number, h = {
|
|
491
|
-
id: U(`CLR-${e.prefix}-${m}-`, p.map((e) => e.id)),
|
|
492
|
-
pass: s.pass,
|
|
493
|
-
reviewer: s.reviewer,
|
|
494
|
-
reviewContext: s.reviewContext,
|
|
495
|
-
planRevision: r,
|
|
496
|
-
completedAt: s.at,
|
|
497
|
-
findingRefs: [...s.findings].sort(),
|
|
498
|
-
result: s.findings.length === 0 ? "passed" : "findings",
|
|
499
|
-
toolVersion: s.toolVersion
|
|
500
|
-
}, g = null;
|
|
501
|
-
if (s.pass === "adversarial" && h.result === "passed") {
|
|
502
|
-
let t = [...p].reverse().find((e) => e.pass === "contract" && e.result === "passed" && e.planRevision === r);
|
|
503
|
-
g = {
|
|
504
|
-
id: U(`CRT-${e.prefix}-${m}-`, (n?.certificates ?? []).map((e) => e.id)),
|
|
505
|
-
plan: c,
|
|
506
|
-
planRevision: r,
|
|
507
|
-
workItems: l.map((e) => e.id).sort(),
|
|
508
|
-
evidenceRefs: a.filter((e) => e.subjectRefs.some((e) => d.has(e))).map((e) => e.id).sort(),
|
|
509
|
-
closureRuns: [t.id, h.id],
|
|
510
|
-
confirmedBy: s.reviewer,
|
|
511
|
-
issuedAt: s.at,
|
|
512
|
-
toolVersion: s.toolVersion
|
|
513
|
-
};
|
|
514
|
-
}
|
|
515
|
-
return {
|
|
516
|
-
outcome: "recorded",
|
|
517
|
-
file: {
|
|
518
|
-
schemaVersion: F,
|
|
519
|
-
plan: c,
|
|
520
|
-
runs: [...p, h],
|
|
521
|
-
certificates: [...n?.certificates ?? [], ...g === null ? [] : [g]]
|
|
522
|
-
},
|
|
523
|
-
run: h,
|
|
524
|
-
certificate: g
|
|
525
|
-
};
|
|
526
|
-
}, W = (e, t, n, r, i, a = []) => ({
|
|
527
|
-
ruleId: e,
|
|
528
|
-
severity: t,
|
|
529
|
-
message: n,
|
|
530
|
-
locator: r,
|
|
531
|
-
related: [...a].sort(),
|
|
532
|
-
nextAction: i
|
|
533
|
-
}), ie = r.makeFormatterStandardSchemaV1(), G = (r, i, a, o) => {
|
|
534
|
-
let s = n.decodeUnknownExit(i, {
|
|
535
|
-
onExcessProperty: "error",
|
|
536
|
-
errors: "all"
|
|
537
|
-
}), c = [];
|
|
538
|
-
for (let n of r) {
|
|
539
|
-
let r = s(n.content);
|
|
540
|
-
if (t.isSuccess(r)) {
|
|
541
|
-
c.push({
|
|
542
|
-
file: n.file,
|
|
543
|
-
value: r.value
|
|
544
|
-
});
|
|
545
|
-
continue;
|
|
546
|
-
}
|
|
547
|
-
let i = e.findErrorOption(r.cause), l = i._tag === "Some" ? ie(i.value.issue).issues : [{
|
|
548
|
-
message: e.pretty(r.cause),
|
|
549
|
-
path: []
|
|
550
|
-
}];
|
|
551
|
-
for (let e of l) {
|
|
552
|
-
let t = (e.path ?? []).map((e) => String(typeof e == "object" ? e.key : e));
|
|
553
|
-
o.push(W("schema/invalid", "error", `${a}: ${e.message}`, {
|
|
554
|
-
file: n.file,
|
|
555
|
-
path: t.join(".") || "(root)"
|
|
556
|
-
}, "Correct the field to the v1 contract; unknown fields are not allowed."));
|
|
557
|
-
}
|
|
558
|
-
}
|
|
559
|
-
return c;
|
|
560
|
-
}, ae = [
|
|
561
|
-
["private key", /-----BEGIN [A-Z ]*PRIVATE KEY-----/],
|
|
562
|
-
["Stripe key", /\b[sr]k_(live|test)_[A-Za-z0-9]{16,}/],
|
|
563
|
-
["GitHub token", /\bgh[pousr]_[A-Za-z0-9]{30,}/],
|
|
564
|
-
["AWS access key", /\bAKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}\b/],
|
|
565
|
-
["Slack token", /\bxox[abprs]-[A-Za-z0-9-]{10,}/],
|
|
566
|
-
["bearer token", /\bBearer\s+[A-Za-z0-9._~+/-]{20,}/]
|
|
567
|
-
], K = (e, t, n, r) => {
|
|
568
|
-
if (typeof e == "string") for (let [i, a] of ae) a.test(e) && r.push(W("security/secret", "security", `a ${i} is in the plan artefact`, {
|
|
569
|
-
file: t,
|
|
570
|
-
path: n
|
|
571
|
-
}, "Remove the secret, rotate it, and reference where it is kept instead."));
|
|
572
|
-
else if (Array.isArray(e)) e.forEach((e, i) => K(e, t, `${n}[${i}]`, r));
|
|
573
|
-
else if (typeof e == "object" && e) for (let [i, a] of Object.entries(e)) K(a, t, n === "" ? i : `${n}.${i}`, r);
|
|
574
|
-
}, q = (e) => {
|
|
575
|
-
let t = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(), n = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map(), r = (r) => {
|
|
576
|
-
let i = [], a = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(), o = (r) => {
|
|
577
|
-
i.push(r), a.add(r);
|
|
578
|
-
for (let s of [...e.get(r) ?? []].sort()) if (e.has(s)) {
|
|
579
|
-
if (a.has(s)) {
|
|
580
|
-
let e = i.slice(i.indexOf(s)), t = e.reduce((e, t) => t < e ? t : e), r = [...e.slice(e.indexOf(t)), ...e.slice(0, e.indexOf(t))];
|
|
581
|
-
n.set(r.join(">"), r);
|
|
582
|
-
} else t.has(s) || o(s);
|
|
583
|
-
}
|
|
584
|
-
i.pop(), a.delete(r), t.add(r);
|
|
585
|
-
};
|
|
586
|
-
o(r);
|
|
587
|
-
};
|
|
588
|
-
for (let n of [...e.keys()].sort()) t.has(n) || r(n);
|
|
589
|
-
return [...n.values()].sort((e, t) => e.join(">") < t.join(">") ? -1 : 1);
|
|
590
|
-
}, oe = (e) => {
|
|
591
|
-
let { shape: t, clock: n } = e, r = t.grammar, i = [];
|
|
592
|
-
for (let t of [
|
|
593
|
-
...e.instances,
|
|
594
|
-
...e.evidence ?? [],
|
|
595
|
-
...e.findings ?? [],
|
|
596
|
-
...e.closures ?? []
|
|
597
|
-
]) K(t.content, t.file, "", i);
|
|
598
|
-
let a = G(e.instances, w(t), "plan instance", i).map(({ file: e, value: t }) => ({
|
|
599
|
-
file: e,
|
|
600
|
-
instance: t
|
|
601
|
-
})), c = (e.evidence ?? []).flatMap((e) => G(Array.isArray(e.content) ? e.content.map((t, n) => ({
|
|
602
|
-
file: `${e.file}#${n}`,
|
|
603
|
-
content: t
|
|
604
|
-
})) : [e], T(t), "evidence", i).map((e) => e.value)), l = (e.findings ?? []).flatMap((e) => G(Array.isArray(e.content) ? e.content.map((t, n) => ({
|
|
605
|
-
file: `${e.file}#${n}`,
|
|
606
|
-
content: t
|
|
607
|
-
})) : [e], E(t), "finding", i).map((e) => e.value)), u = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map(), d = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map(), f = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
|
|
608
|
-
for (let { file: t, instance: n } of a) {
|
|
609
|
-
let a = n.plan;
|
|
610
|
-
u.has(a.id) && i.push(W("identity/duplicate-plan", "error", `${a.id} is declared in two files`, {
|
|
611
|
-
file: t,
|
|
612
|
-
plan: a.id
|
|
613
|
-
}, "Keep one instance file per plan.", [u.get(a.id)])), u.set(a.id, t), o(a.id) !== a.number && i.push(W("identity/plan-number", "error", `${a.id} has number ${a.number}`, {
|
|
614
|
-
file: t,
|
|
615
|
-
plan: a.id,
|
|
616
|
-
path: "plan.number"
|
|
617
|
-
}, "Make the number match the plan id."));
|
|
618
|
-
for (let e of n.workItems) {
|
|
619
|
-
let n = {
|
|
620
|
-
file: t,
|
|
621
|
-
plan: a.id,
|
|
622
|
-
workItem: e.id
|
|
623
|
-
};
|
|
624
|
-
d.has(e.id) ? i.push(W("identity/duplicate-work-item", "error", `${e.id} is declared twice`, n, "Give the second item its own id; ids are never reused.", [d.get(e.id).file])) : d.set(e.id, {
|
|
625
|
-
file: t,
|
|
626
|
-
item: e
|
|
627
|
-
}), (e.ownerPlan !== a.id || o(e.id) !== a.number) && i.push(W("identity/owner-mismatch", "error", `${e.id} is owned by ${e.ownerPlan} but lives in ${a.id}`, n, "Move the item to its plan’s file or correct ownerPlan."));
|
|
628
|
-
let c = [
|
|
629
|
-
...e.acceptance.map((e) => e.id),
|
|
630
|
-
...e.evidenceRequirements.map((e) => e.id),
|
|
631
|
-
...e.sourceRefs.map((e) => e.id)
|
|
632
|
-
];
|
|
633
|
-
for (let t of c) s(r, t) !== e.id && i.push(W("identity/child-id", "error", `${t} does not belong to ${e.id}`, n, `Number it under ${e.id}.`));
|
|
634
|
-
for (let t of e.sourceRefs) f.has(t.id) && i.push(W("source/duplicate", "error", `source ${t.id} is disposed twice`, n, "Dispose each source block exactly once.", [f.get(t.id)])), f.set(t.id, e.id), t.disposition !== "owned-by" && t.targetId === void 0 && i.push(W("source/missing-target", "error", `source ${t.id} is ${t.disposition} without a target`, {
|
|
635
|
-
...n,
|
|
636
|
-
path: `sourceRefs.${t.id}`
|
|
637
|
-
}, "Name the work item or decision it points to."));
|
|
638
|
-
}
|
|
639
|
-
if (e.sources !== void 0) {
|
|
640
|
-
let r = e.sources.get(a.source);
|
|
641
|
-
r == null ? i.push(W("source/missing", "error", `${a.id}'s source ${a.source} cannot be read`, {
|
|
642
|
-
file: t,
|
|
643
|
-
plan: a.id,
|
|
644
|
-
path: "plan.source"
|
|
645
|
-
}, "Restore the source or point the plan at it.")) : (r !== a.sourceRevision || r !== n.extraction.sourceRevision) && i.push(W("source/stale", "error", `${a.source} changed since ${a.id} was decomposed (${a.sourceRevision.slice(0, 19)}… → ${r.slice(0, 19)}…)`, {
|
|
646
|
-
file: t,
|
|
647
|
-
plan: a.id,
|
|
648
|
-
path: "plan.sourceRevision"
|
|
649
|
-
}, "Regenerate the plan’s decomposition from its source; closure waits until then."));
|
|
650
|
-
}
|
|
651
|
-
let c = n.workItems.reduce((e, t) => e + t.sourceRefs.length, 0);
|
|
652
|
-
(n.coverage.disposedSources !== c || n.coverage.unmatchedSources > 0 || n.coverage.duplicateSources > 0 || a.decompositionComplete && n.coverage.result !== "complete") && i.push(W("source/coverage", "error", `${a.id} claims ${n.coverage.disposedSources} disposed sources (${n.coverage.unmatchedSources} unmatched, ${n.coverage.duplicateSources} duplicate, ${n.coverage.result}) and holds ${c}`, {
|
|
653
|
-
file: t,
|
|
654
|
-
plan: a.id,
|
|
655
|
-
path: "coverage"
|
|
656
|
-
}, "Regenerate the plan’s decomposition from its source."));
|
|
657
|
-
}
|
|
658
|
-
let p = new Set(c.map((e) => e.id));
|
|
659
|
-
for (let { file: t, item: n } of d.values()) {
|
|
660
|
-
let r = {
|
|
661
|
-
file: t,
|
|
662
|
-
plan: n.ownerPlan,
|
|
663
|
-
workItem: n.id
|
|
664
|
-
};
|
|
665
|
-
for (let e of n.dependsOn) e === n.id ? i.push(W("graph/self-dependency", "error", `${n.id} depends on itself`, r, "Remove the dependency.")) : d.has(e) || i.push(W("graph/missing-dependency", "error", `${n.id} depends on ${e}, which does not exist`, r, "Point at an existing item or remove the dependency.", [e]));
|
|
666
|
-
if (e.decisions !== void 0) for (let t of n.links.adrs) e.decisions.has(t) || i.push(W("graph/missing-decision", "error", `${n.id} links ${t}, which the decision records do not hold`, r, "Add the decision record or correct the link.", [t]));
|
|
667
|
-
for (let e of n.links.relatedTo) d.has(e) || i.push(W("graph/missing-related", "error", `${n.id} relates to ${e}, which does not exist`, r, "Point at an existing item.", [e]));
|
|
668
|
-
n.supersededBy !== void 0 && !d.has(n.supersededBy) && i.push(W("graph/missing-successor", "error", `${n.id} is superseded by ${n.supersededBy}, which does not exist`, r, "Name the item that replaces it.", [n.supersededBy]));
|
|
669
|
-
let a = [
|
|
670
|
-
...n.evidenceRefs,
|
|
671
|
-
...n.acceptance.flatMap((e) => e.evidenceRefs),
|
|
672
|
-
...n.evidenceRequirements.flatMap((e) => e.evidenceRefs),
|
|
673
|
-
...n.statusHistory.flatMap((e) => e.evidenceRefs)
|
|
674
|
-
];
|
|
675
|
-
for (let e of [...new Set(a)].sort()) p.has(e) || i.push(W("evidence/missing", "error", `${n.id} names evidence ${e}, which does not exist`, r, "Add the evidence with `voltro plan evidence add` or remove the reference.", [e]));
|
|
676
|
-
n.owners.length === 0 && i.push(W("quality/no-owner", "warning", `${n.id} has no owner`, r, "Name who owns the item."));
|
|
677
|
-
}
|
|
678
|
-
for (let e of q(new Map([...d.values()].map(({ item: e }) => [e.id, e.dependsOn])))) {
|
|
679
|
-
let t = d.get(e[0]);
|
|
680
|
-
i.push(W("graph/cycle", "error", `dependency cycle: ${[...e, e[0]].join(" → ")}`, {
|
|
681
|
-
file: t.file,
|
|
682
|
-
plan: t.item.ownerPlan,
|
|
683
|
-
workItem: e[0]
|
|
684
|
-
}, "Break the cycle: one of these items must not wait for the others.", e));
|
|
685
|
-
}
|
|
686
|
-
for (let e of l) for (let t of e.targetWorkItems) d.has(t) || i.push(W("graph/missing-finding-target", "error", `finding ${e.id} targets ${t}, which does not exist`, { workItem: t }, "Point the finding at an existing item.", [e.id]));
|
|
687
|
-
for (let { file: e, item: t } of d.values()) {
|
|
688
|
-
let n = {
|
|
689
|
-
file: e,
|
|
690
|
-
plan: t.ownerPlan,
|
|
691
|
-
workItem: t.id
|
|
692
|
-
};
|
|
693
|
-
for (let e of t.acceptance) e.status !== "pending" && e.evidenceRefs.length === 0 && i.push(W("acceptance/decided-without-evidence", "error", `${e.id} is ${e.status} without evidence`, {
|
|
694
|
-
...n,
|
|
695
|
-
path: e.id
|
|
696
|
-
}, "Name the evidence the decision rests on."));
|
|
697
|
-
for (let e of t.evidenceRequirements) e.status === "satisfied" && e.evidenceRefs.length === 0 && i.push(W("acceptance/satisfied-without-evidence", "error", `${e.id} is satisfied without evidence`, {
|
|
698
|
-
...n,
|
|
699
|
-
path: e.id
|
|
700
|
-
}, "Name the evidence that satisfies it.")), e.status === "waived" && e.waiver === void 0 && i.push(W("acceptance/waived-without-waiver", "error", `${e.id} is waived without a waiver`, {
|
|
701
|
-
...n,
|
|
702
|
-
path: e.id
|
|
703
|
-
}, "Write the waiver: rationale, reviewer, expiry and compensating control."));
|
|
704
|
-
}
|
|
705
|
-
let m = j(c, l), h = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map(), g = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map(), _ = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(), v = (e) => {
|
|
706
|
-
let t = h.get(e);
|
|
707
|
-
if (t !== void 0) return t;
|
|
708
|
-
let r = d.get(e);
|
|
709
|
-
if (r === void 0 || _.has(e)) return;
|
|
710
|
-
_.add(e);
|
|
711
|
-
let i = N(r.item, m, v, n);
|
|
712
|
-
_.delete(e);
|
|
713
|
-
let a = P(r.item, i);
|
|
714
|
-
return h.set(e, a), g.set(e, i), a;
|
|
715
|
-
};
|
|
716
|
-
for (let { file: e, item: t } of [...d.values()].sort((e, t) => e.item.id < t.item.id ? -1 : 1)) {
|
|
717
|
-
let n = {
|
|
718
|
-
file: e,
|
|
719
|
-
plan: t.ownerPlan,
|
|
720
|
-
workItem: t.id
|
|
721
|
-
}, r = null;
|
|
722
|
-
t.statusHistory.forEach((e, a) => {
|
|
723
|
-
e.from === r ? e.from !== null && !k[e.from].includes(e.to) && i.push(W("state/forbidden-transition", "error", `${t.id} went ${e.from} → ${e.to}`, {
|
|
724
|
-
...n,
|
|
725
|
-
path: `statusHistory[${a}]`
|
|
726
|
-
}, `From ${e.from} an item goes to ${k[e.from].join(", ")}.`)) : i.push(W("state/history-break", "error", `${t.id} history step ${a + 1} starts at ${e.from ?? "nothing"}, after ${r ?? "nothing"}`, {
|
|
727
|
-
...n,
|
|
728
|
-
path: `statusHistory[${a}]`
|
|
729
|
-
}, "Record every transition in order.")), r = e.to;
|
|
730
|
-
}), r !== t.status && i.push(W("state/history-end", "error", `${t.id} is ${t.status} but its history ends at ${r ?? "nothing"}`, {
|
|
731
|
-
...n,
|
|
732
|
-
path: "status"
|
|
733
|
-
}, "Record the transition that led to the current state.")), t.status === "blocked" && t.blocker === void 0 && i.push(W("state/blocked-without-blocker", "error", `${t.id} is blocked without a blocker`, {
|
|
734
|
-
...n,
|
|
735
|
-
path: "blocker"
|
|
736
|
-
}, "Write down reason, owner, next action and recheck trigger.")), t.status !== "blocked" && t.blocker !== void 0 && i.push(W("state/blocker-not-blocked", "error", `${t.id} carries a blocker but is ${t.status}`, {
|
|
737
|
-
...n,
|
|
738
|
-
path: "blocker"
|
|
739
|
-
}, "Remove the blocker or record the block.")), v(t.id);
|
|
740
|
-
}
|
|
741
|
-
let y = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
|
|
742
|
-
for (let { file: n, value: r } of G(e.closures ?? [], z(t), "closure record", i)) u.has(r.plan) ? y.has(r.plan) ? i.push(W("closure/duplicate", "error", `${r.plan} has two closure records`, {
|
|
743
|
-
file: n,
|
|
744
|
-
plan: r.plan
|
|
745
|
-
}, "Keep one closure record per plan.", [y.get(r.plan).file])) : y.set(r.plan, {
|
|
746
|
-
file: n,
|
|
747
|
-
record: r
|
|
748
|
-
}) : i.push(W("closure/unknown-plan", "error", `a closure record names ${r.plan}, which does not exist`, {
|
|
749
|
-
file: n,
|
|
750
|
-
plan: r.plan
|
|
751
|
-
}, "Remove it or correct the plan id."));
|
|
752
|
-
let b = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map(), x = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
|
|
753
|
-
for (let { instance: t } of a) {
|
|
754
|
-
let n = B(t, c, l, (e) => h.get(e), e.decisions);
|
|
755
|
-
b.set(t.plan.id, n);
|
|
756
|
-
let r = y.get(t.plan.id), a = V(r?.record, n);
|
|
757
|
-
if (x.set(t.plan.id, a), r !== void 0 && r.record.certificates.length > 0 && a.state !== "certified" && i.push(W("closure/stale-certificate", "warning", `${t.plan.id} changed after its certificate ${r.record.certificates.at(-1).id}: it is open again`, {
|
|
758
|
-
file: r.file,
|
|
759
|
-
plan: t.plan.id
|
|
760
|
-
}, "Verify what changed and run both closure passes again.")), a.state === "certified") for (let e of t.workItems) h.get(e.id) === "verified" && h.set(e.id, "closed");
|
|
761
|
-
t.plan.status === "complete" && a.state !== "certified" && i.push(W("state/manual-derived", "error", `${t.plan.id} says complete without a certificate on its current revision`, {
|
|
762
|
-
plan: t.plan.id,
|
|
763
|
-
path: "plan.status"
|
|
764
|
-
}, "Close it with both passes: voltro plan close <plan>."));
|
|
765
|
-
}
|
|
766
|
-
for (let { file: e, item: t } of [...d.values()].sort((e, t) => e.item.id < t.item.id ? -1 : 1)) {
|
|
767
|
-
let n = h.get(t.id);
|
|
768
|
-
A.has(t.status) && n !== t.status && (t.status !== "verified" || n !== "closed") && i.push(W("state/manual-derived", "error", `${t.id} says ${t.status}; the evidence says ${n}: ${(g.get(t.id) ?? []).slice(0, 3).join("; ") || "its plan holds no certificate on its current revision"}`, {
|
|
769
|
-
file: e,
|
|
770
|
-
plan: t.ownerPlan,
|
|
771
|
-
workItem: t.id,
|
|
772
|
-
path: "status"
|
|
773
|
-
}, "Add the missing evidence; verified and closed are derived, never set."));
|
|
774
|
-
}
|
|
775
|
-
return {
|
|
776
|
-
program: {
|
|
777
|
-
instances: a,
|
|
778
|
-
items: d,
|
|
779
|
-
evidence: c,
|
|
780
|
-
findings: l,
|
|
781
|
-
status: h,
|
|
782
|
-
gaps: g,
|
|
783
|
-
closures: y,
|
|
784
|
-
revisions: b,
|
|
785
|
-
closure: x
|
|
786
|
-
},
|
|
787
|
-
diagnostics: te(i)
|
|
788
|
-
};
|
|
789
|
-
}, J = () => Object.fromEntries(y.map((e) => [e, 0])), se = (e) => {
|
|
790
|
-
let t = J();
|
|
791
|
-
return {
|
|
792
|
-
plans: e.instances.map(({ file: n, instance: r }) => {
|
|
793
|
-
let i = J(), a = J(), o = [];
|
|
794
|
-
for (let n of r.workItems) {
|
|
795
|
-
let r = e.status.get(n.id) ?? n.status;
|
|
796
|
-
(n.mandatory ? i : a)[r]++, n.mandatory && t[r]++, r === "blocked" && n.blocker !== void 0 && o.push({
|
|
797
|
-
workItem: n.id,
|
|
798
|
-
reason: n.blocker.reason,
|
|
799
|
-
owner: n.blocker.owner,
|
|
800
|
-
nextAction: n.blocker.nextAction
|
|
801
|
-
});
|
|
802
|
-
}
|
|
803
|
-
let s = r.workItems.filter((e) => e.mandatory).length, c = i.verified + i.closed, l = e.closure.get(r.plan.id), u = r.plan.decompositionComplete ? l?.state === "certified" ? "complete" : s > 0 && c === s ? l?.state === "closure-1" ? "closure-1" : "verifying" : i.active + i.blocked + c > 0 ? "active" : i.ready > 0 ? "ready" : "decomposing" : "decomposing";
|
|
804
|
-
return {
|
|
805
|
-
plan: r.plan.id,
|
|
806
|
-
title: r.plan.title,
|
|
807
|
-
file: n,
|
|
808
|
-
recorded: r.plan.status,
|
|
809
|
-
derived: u,
|
|
810
|
-
certificate: l?.state === "certified" ? l.certificate.id : null,
|
|
811
|
-
mandatory: i,
|
|
812
|
-
optional: a,
|
|
813
|
-
blocked: o.sort((e, t) => e.workItem < t.workItem ? -1 : 1)
|
|
814
|
-
};
|
|
815
|
-
}).sort((e, t) => e.plan < t.plan ? -1 : 1),
|
|
816
|
-
mandatory: t,
|
|
817
|
-
items: e.items.size
|
|
818
|
-
};
|
|
819
|
-
}, ce = {
|
|
820
|
-
P0: 0,
|
|
821
|
-
P1: 1,
|
|
822
|
-
P2: 2,
|
|
823
|
-
P3: 3
|
|
824
|
-
}, le = (e, t, n) => {
|
|
825
|
-
if (n) return {
|
|
826
|
-
outcome: "invalid",
|
|
827
|
-
reason: "lint reports blocking diagnostics; fix them first (`voltro plan lint`)"
|
|
828
|
-
};
|
|
829
|
-
let r = (t) => e.status.get(t), i = new Set([...e.items.values()].filter(({ item: e }) => [
|
|
830
|
-
"active",
|
|
831
|
-
"verified",
|
|
832
|
-
"closed"
|
|
833
|
-
].includes(r(e.id) ?? "")).map(({ item: e }) => e.ownerPlan)), a = [...e.items.values()].filter(({ item: e }) => e.mandatory && e.supersededBy === void 0 && (t.plan === void 0 || e.ownerPlan === t.plan || e.ownerPlan.endsWith(`-PLAN-${t.plan}`)) && (t.owner === void 0 || e.owners.includes(t.owner)) && (t.repo === void 0 || e.repos.includes(t.repo)));
|
|
834
|
-
if (a.every(({ item: e }) => ["verified", "closed"].includes(r(e.id) ?? ""))) return { outcome: "complete" };
|
|
835
|
-
let o = (e) => e.dependsOn.every((e) => ["verified", "closed"].includes(r(e) ?? "")), s = (e) => [
|
|
836
|
-
r(e.id) === "active" ? 0 : 1,
|
|
837
|
-
ce[e.priority],
|
|
838
|
-
e.kind === "security" ? 0 : 1,
|
|
839
|
-
+!i.has(e.ownerPlan),
|
|
840
|
-
+!o(e),
|
|
841
|
-
e.id
|
|
842
|
-
], c = (e, t) => {
|
|
843
|
-
for (let n = 0; n < e.length; n++) if (e[n] !== t[n]) return e[n] < t[n];
|
|
844
|
-
return !1;
|
|
845
|
-
}, l = (e) => {
|
|
846
|
-
let t;
|
|
847
|
-
for (let n of a) {
|
|
848
|
-
if (!e.includes(r(n.item.id) ?? "")) continue;
|
|
849
|
-
let i = s(n.item);
|
|
850
|
-
(t === void 0 || c(i, t.rank)) && (t = {
|
|
851
|
-
entry: n,
|
|
852
|
-
rank: i
|
|
853
|
-
});
|
|
854
|
-
}
|
|
855
|
-
return t;
|
|
856
|
-
}, u = l(["active", "ready"]);
|
|
857
|
-
if (u !== void 0) {
|
|
858
|
-
let e = u.entry, t = r(e.item.id);
|
|
859
|
-
return {
|
|
860
|
-
outcome: "item",
|
|
861
|
-
workItem: e.item,
|
|
862
|
-
file: e.file,
|
|
863
|
-
why: [
|
|
864
|
-
t === "active" ? "it is already active" : "it is ready",
|
|
865
|
-
`priority ${e.item.priority}`,
|
|
866
|
-
...e.item.kind === "security" ? ["security work comes first"] : [],
|
|
867
|
-
i.has(e.item.ownerPlan) ? `${e.item.ownerPlan} is already under way` : "no started plan has workable items",
|
|
868
|
-
u.rank[4] === 0 ? "its dependencies are verified" : "no dependency-ready item is left, so it waits on its dependencies"
|
|
869
|
-
]
|
|
870
|
-
};
|
|
871
|
-
}
|
|
872
|
-
let d = l(["proposed"]), f = a.filter(({ item: e }) => r(e.id) === "proposed").length, p = a.filter(({ item: e }) => r(e.id) === "blocked").length;
|
|
873
|
-
return {
|
|
874
|
-
outcome: "blocked",
|
|
875
|
-
reason: `no mandatory item is active or ready: ${f} proposed await readiness${p > 0 ? `, ${p} blocked` : ""}`,
|
|
876
|
-
prepare: d?.entry.item ?? null,
|
|
877
|
-
file: d?.entry.file ?? null
|
|
878
|
-
};
|
|
879
|
-
}, Y = "voltro-plan-command/v1", ue = (e) => ({
|
|
880
|
-
schemaVersion: Y,
|
|
881
|
-
...e
|
|
882
|
-
}), X = {
|
|
883
|
-
ok: 0,
|
|
884
|
-
failed: 1,
|
|
885
|
-
usage: 2,
|
|
886
|
-
input: 3,
|
|
887
|
-
conflict: 4,
|
|
888
|
-
provider: 5,
|
|
889
|
-
security: 6,
|
|
890
|
-
internal: 70
|
|
891
|
-
}, Z = "voltro-plan-manifest/v1", Q = n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isMinLength(1)), n.check(n.makeFilter((e) => !e.startsWith("/") && !/^[A-Za-z]:/.test(e) && !e.split("/").includes("..") || "a path stays inside the project root"))), de = n.Struct({
|
|
892
|
-
schemaVersion: n.Literal(Z),
|
|
893
|
-
prefix: n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isPattern(/^[A-Z][A-Z0-9]{1,9}$/))),
|
|
894
|
-
instanceVersion: n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isMinLength(1))),
|
|
895
|
-
repos: n.Array(n.String.pipe(n.check(n.isMinLength(1)))).pipe(n.check(n.isMinLength(1))),
|
|
896
|
-
instances: n.Array(Q).pipe(n.check(n.isMinLength(1))),
|
|
897
|
-
evidence: n.optional(n.Array(Q)),
|
|
898
|
-
evidenceDir: n.optional(Q),
|
|
899
|
-
closureDir: n.optional(Q),
|
|
900
|
-
adrDir: n.optional(Q),
|
|
901
|
-
findings: n.optional(n.Array(Q))
|
|
902
|
-
}), $ = (e, t, n, r, i, a) => ({
|
|
903
|
-
outcome: "refused",
|
|
904
|
-
exit: a,
|
|
905
|
-
diagnostic: {
|
|
906
|
-
ruleId: e,
|
|
907
|
-
severity: t,
|
|
908
|
-
message: n,
|
|
909
|
-
locator: { workItem: i },
|
|
910
|
-
related: [],
|
|
911
|
-
nextAction: r
|
|
912
|
-
}
|
|
913
|
-
}), fe = [
|
|
914
|
-
/-----BEGIN [A-Z ]*PRIVATE KEY-----/,
|
|
915
|
-
/\b[sr]k_(live|test)_[A-Za-z0-9]{16,}/,
|
|
916
|
-
/\bgh[pousr]_[A-Za-z0-9]{30,}/,
|
|
917
|
-
/\bAKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}\b/,
|
|
918
|
-
/\bxox[abprs]-[A-Za-z0-9-]{10,}/,
|
|
919
|
-
/\bBearer\s+[A-Za-z0-9._~+/-]{20,}/
|
|
920
|
-
], pe = (e, t, n) => {
|
|
921
|
-
let r = e.items.get(n.workItem)?.item;
|
|
922
|
-
if (r === void 0) return $("evidence/unknown-target", "error", `${n.workItem} is not a work item of this program`, "Name an existing work item.", n.workItem, X.failed);
|
|
923
|
-
if ([
|
|
924
|
-
n.title,
|
|
925
|
-
n.uri,
|
|
926
|
-
n.producedBy,
|
|
927
|
-
n.command ?? "",
|
|
928
|
-
n.environment ?? ""
|
|
929
|
-
].some((e) => fe.some((t) => t.test(e))) || /^[a-z][a-z0-9+.-]*:\/\/[^/@\s]*:[^/@\s]*@/i.test(n.uri)) return $("security/secret", "security", "the evidence carries a secret or a credential", "Remove it; reference where the result is kept, never a key.", r.id, X.security);
|
|
930
|
-
if (!x.includes(n.kind)) return $("evidence/kind", "error", `"${n.kind}" is not an evidence kind`, `Use one of: ${x.join(", ")}.`, r.id, X.usage);
|
|
931
|
-
if (/^http:\/\//i.test(n.uri)) return $("evidence/uri", "error", `${n.uri} is not https`, "Reference evidence over https, git: or a project-relative path.", r.id, X.failed);
|
|
932
|
-
if (n.uri.startsWith("/") || /^[A-Za-z]:[\\/]/.test(n.uri) || n.uri.split("/").includes("..")) return $("evidence/uri", "error", `${n.uri} is not portable`, "Use a path relative to the project root, or a URL.", r.id, X.failed);
|
|
933
|
-
let i = [r.id];
|
|
934
|
-
for (let e of n.proves) {
|
|
935
|
-
let t = /^[AE][0-9]{2}$/.test(e) ? `${r.id}-${e}` : e, a = r.acceptance.find((e) => e.id === t), o = r.evidenceRequirements.find((e) => e.id === t);
|
|
936
|
-
if (a === void 0 && o === void 0) return $("evidence/unknown-target", "error", `${t} is not a check or requirement of ${r.id}`, `Name one of ${[...r.acceptance, ...r.evidenceRequirements].map((e) => e.id).join(", ")}.`, r.id, X.failed);
|
|
937
|
-
if (o !== void 0 && !o.kinds.includes(n.kind)) return $("evidence/wrong-kind", "error", `${o.id} asks for ${o.kinds.join("/")}, not ${n.kind}`, "Add evidence of a kind the requirement names.", r.id, X.failed);
|
|
938
|
-
i.push(t);
|
|
939
|
-
}
|
|
940
|
-
let a = {
|
|
941
|
-
kind: n.kind,
|
|
942
|
-
title: n.title,
|
|
943
|
-
uri: n.uri,
|
|
944
|
-
result: n.result,
|
|
945
|
-
subjectRefs: [...new Set(i)],
|
|
946
|
-
producedBy: n.producedBy,
|
|
947
|
-
...n.command === void 0 ? {} : { command: n.command },
|
|
948
|
-
...n.environment === void 0 ? {} : { environment: n.environment },
|
|
949
|
-
...n.fingerprint === void 0 ? {} : { fingerprint: n.fingerprint }
|
|
950
|
-
};
|
|
951
|
-
if (n.idempotencyKey !== void 0) {
|
|
952
|
-
let t = e.evidence.find((e) => e.idempotencyKey === n.idempotencyKey);
|
|
953
|
-
if (t !== void 0) {
|
|
954
|
-
let { id: e, observedAt: i, idempotencyKey: o, ...s } = t;
|
|
955
|
-
return c(s) === c(a) ? {
|
|
956
|
-
outcome: "same",
|
|
957
|
-
evidence: t
|
|
958
|
-
} : $("evidence/idempotency-conflict", "error", `the key "${n.idempotencyKey}" was used for other evidence (${t.id})`, "Use a new key for new evidence.", r.id, X.conflict);
|
|
959
|
-
}
|
|
960
|
-
}
|
|
961
|
-
let o = `EVD-${r.id}-`, s = e.evidence.filter((e) => e.id.startsWith(o)).map((e) => Number(e.id.slice(o.length))), l = String(Math.max(0, ...s) + 1).padStart(3, "0");
|
|
962
|
-
return t.evidence.test(`${o}${l}`) ? {
|
|
963
|
-
outcome: "add",
|
|
964
|
-
evidence: {
|
|
965
|
-
id: `${o}${l}`,
|
|
966
|
-
...a,
|
|
967
|
-
observedAt: n.observedAt,
|
|
968
|
-
...n.idempotencyKey === void 0 ? {} : { idempotencyKey: n.idempotencyKey }
|
|
969
|
-
}
|
|
970
|
-
} : $("evidence/exhausted", "error", `${r.id} has no evidence number left`, "Supersede the item.", r.id, X.failed);
|
|
971
|
-
}, me = [
|
|
972
|
-
".",
|
|
973
|
-
":",
|
|
974
|
-
"/",
|
|
975
|
-
"-"
|
|
976
|
-
], he = (e, t) => e === t || me.some((n) => t.startsWith(e + n) || e.startsWith(t + n)), ge = (e, t) => {
|
|
977
|
-
let n = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map(), r = (e, t) => {
|
|
978
|
-
let r = n.get(e) ?? /* @__PURE__ */ new Set();
|
|
979
|
-
r.add(t), n.set(e, r);
|
|
980
|
-
};
|
|
981
|
-
for (let { item: n } of e.items.values()) for (let e of t.tags) for (let t of n.impactTags) he(e, t) && r(n.id, `tag ${t}`);
|
|
982
|
-
let i = [], a = new Map(e.instances.map(({ file: e, instance: t }) => [e, t])), o = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
|
|
983
|
-
for (let { item: t } of e.items.values()) for (let e of t.sourceRefs) {
|
|
984
|
-
let n = o.get(e.uri);
|
|
985
|
-
n === void 0 && (n = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(), o.set(e.uri, n)), n.add(t.id);
|
|
986
|
-
}
|
|
987
|
-
for (let e of [...new Set(t.files)].sort()) {
|
|
988
|
-
let t = !1, n = a.get(e);
|
|
989
|
-
if (n !== void 0) {
|
|
990
|
-
t = !0;
|
|
991
|
-
for (let t of n.workItems) r(t.id, `its plan file ${e} changed`);
|
|
992
|
-
}
|
|
993
|
-
for (let n of o.get(e) ?? []) t = !0, r(n, `its source ${e} changed`);
|
|
994
|
-
t || i.push(e);
|
|
995
|
-
}
|
|
996
|
-
let s = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
|
|
997
|
-
for (let { item: t } of e.items.values()) for (let e of t.dependsOn) {
|
|
998
|
-
let n = s.get(e);
|
|
999
|
-
n === void 0 && (n = [], s.set(e, n)), n.push(t.id);
|
|
1000
|
-
}
|
|
1001
|
-
for (let e of s.values()) e.sort();
|
|
1002
|
-
let c = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map(), l = [...n.keys()].sort().map((e) => [e]), u = new Set(n.keys());
|
|
1003
|
-
for (let e = 0; e < l.length; e++) {
|
|
1004
|
-
let t = l[e];
|
|
1005
|
-
for (let e of s.get(t.at(-1)) ?? []) {
|
|
1006
|
-
if (u.has(e)) continue;
|
|
1007
|
-
u.add(e);
|
|
1008
|
-
let n = [...t, e];
|
|
1009
|
-
c.set(e, n), l.push(n);
|
|
1010
|
-
}
|
|
1011
|
-
}
|
|
1012
|
-
let d = [...u], f = [...new Set(d.map((t) => e.items.get(t).item.ownerPlan))].sort(), p = f.flatMap((t) => {
|
|
1013
|
-
let n = e.closure.get(t);
|
|
1014
|
-
return n?.state === "certified" ? [{
|
|
1015
|
-
plan: t,
|
|
1016
|
-
certificate: n.certificate.id
|
|
1017
|
-
}] : [];
|
|
1018
|
-
});
|
|
1019
|
-
return {
|
|
1020
|
-
direct: [...n.entries()].map(([e, t]) => ({
|
|
1021
|
-
workItem: e,
|
|
1022
|
-
because: [...t].sort()
|
|
1023
|
-
})).sort((e, t) => e.workItem < t.workItem ? -1 : 1),
|
|
1024
|
-
transitive: [...c.entries()].map(([e, t]) => ({
|
|
1025
|
-
workItem: e,
|
|
1026
|
-
path: t
|
|
1027
|
-
})).sort((e, t) => e.workItem < t.workItem ? -1 : 1),
|
|
1028
|
-
plans: f,
|
|
1029
|
-
certificates: p,
|
|
1030
|
-
unknown: i
|
|
1031
|
-
};
|
|
1032
|
-
};
|
|
1033
|
-
//#endregion
|
|
1034
|
-
export { F as CLOSURE_SCHEMA_VERSION, Y as COMMAND_SCHEMA_VERSION, A as DERIVED, x as EVIDENCE_KINDS, X as EXIT, S as ITEM_KINDS, Z as MANIFEST_SCHEMA_VERSION, de as Manifest, b as PLAN_STATUSES, ee as PRIORITIES, k as TRANSITIONS, y as WORK_ITEM_STATUSES, ne as blocks, c as canonicalJson, z as closureFileSchema, V as closureState, re as decideClosure, pe as decideEvidence, q as dependencyCycles, P as derivedStatus, ue as envelope, T as evidenceSchema, E as findingSchema, f as fingerprint, a as idGrammar, ge as impactOf, j as indexEvidence, oe as lintProgram, le as nextItem, s as ownerItemOf, w as planInstanceSchema, o as planNumberOf, B as planRevision, se as programStatus, d as sha256Hex, te as sortDiagnostics, N as verificationGaps };
|
|
1
|
+
import { idGrammar as e, ownerItemOf as t, planNumberOf as n } from "./ids.js";
|
|
2
|
+
import { canonicalJson as r, fingerprint as i, sha256Hex as a } from "./canonical.js";
|
|
3
|
+
import { EVIDENCE_KINDS as o, ITEM_KINDS as s, PLAN_STATUSES as c, PRIORITIES as l, WORK_ITEM_STATUSES as u, evidenceSchema as d, findingSchema as f, planInstanceSchema as p } from "./schema.js";
|
|
4
|
+
import { blocks as m, sortDiagnostics as h } from "./diagnostics.js";
|
|
5
|
+
import { DERIVED as g, TRANSITIONS as _, derivedStatus as v, indexEvidence as y, verificationGaps as b } from "./state.js";
|
|
6
|
+
import { CLOSURE_SCHEMA_VERSION as x, closureFileSchema as S, closureState as C, decideClosure as w, planRevision as T } from "./closure.js";
|
|
7
|
+
import { dependencyCycles as E, lintProgram as D } from "./lint.js";
|
|
8
|
+
import { programStatus as O } from "./status.js";
|
|
9
|
+
import { nextItem as k } from "./next.js";
|
|
10
|
+
import { COMMAND_SCHEMA_VERSION as A, EXIT as j, envelope as M } from "./envelope.js";
|
|
11
|
+
import { MANIFEST_SCHEMA_VERSION as N, Manifest as P } from "./manifest.js";
|
|
12
|
+
import { decideEvidence as F } from "./evidence.js";
|
|
13
|
+
import { impactOf as I } from "./impact.js";
|
|
14
|
+
export { x as CLOSURE_SCHEMA_VERSION, A as COMMAND_SCHEMA_VERSION, g as DERIVED, o as EVIDENCE_KINDS, j as EXIT, s as ITEM_KINDS, N as MANIFEST_SCHEMA_VERSION, P as Manifest, c as PLAN_STATUSES, l as PRIORITIES, _ as TRANSITIONS, u as WORK_ITEM_STATUSES, m as blocks, r as canonicalJson, S as closureFileSchema, C as closureState, w as decideClosure, F as decideEvidence, E as dependencyCycles, v as derivedStatus, M as envelope, d as evidenceSchema, f as findingSchema, i as fingerprint, e as idGrammar, I as impactOf, y as indexEvidence, D as lintProgram, k as nextItem, t as ownerItemOf, p as planInstanceSchema, n as planNumberOf, T as planRevision, O as programStatus, a as sha256Hex, h as sortDiagnostics, b as verificationGaps };
|