@vitest-agent/mcp 1.0.1 → 1.2.0

package/public/vendor/vitest-docs/guide/browser/visual-regression-testing.md

@@ -1,734 +0,0 @@
-# Visual Regression Testing
-
-Vitest can run visual regression tests out of the box. It captures screenshots
-of your UI components and pages, then compares them against reference images to
-detect unintended visual changes.
-
-Unlike functional tests that verify behavior, visual tests catch styling issues,
-layout shifts, and rendering problems that might otherwise go unnoticed without
-thorough manual testing.
-
-## Why Visual Regression Testing?
-
-Visual bugs don’t throw errors, they just look wrong. That’s where visual
-testing comes in.
-
-- That button still submits the form... but why is it hot pink now?
-- The text fits perfectly... until someone views it on mobile
-- Everything works great... except those two containers are out of viewport
-- That careful CSS refactor works... but broke the layout on a page no one tests
-
-Visual regression testing acts as a safety net for your UI, automatically
-catching these visual changes before they reach production.
-
-## Getting Started
-
-::: warning Browser Rendering Differences
-Visual regression tests are **inherently unstable across different
-environments**. Screenshots will look different on different machines because
-of:
-
-- Font rendering (the big one. Windows, macOS, Linux, they all render text
-differently)
-- GPU drivers and hardware acceleration
-- Whether you're running headless or not
-- Browser settings and versions
-- ...and honestly, sometimes just the phase of the moon
-
-That's why Vitest includes the browser and platform in screenshot names (like
-`button-chromium-darwin.png`).
-
-For stable tests, use the same environment everywhere. We **strongly recommend**
-cloud services like
-[Azure App Testing](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/app-testing/)
-or [Docker containers](https://playwright.dev/docs/docker).
-:::
-
-Visual regression testing in Vitest can be done through the
-[`toMatchScreenshot` assertion](/api/browser/assertions.html#tomatchscreenshot):
-
-```ts
-import { expect, test } from 'vitest'
-import { page } from 'vitest/browser'
-
-test('hero section looks correct', async () => {
-  // ...the rest of the test
-
-  // capture and compare screenshot
-  await expect(page.getByTestId('hero')).toMatchScreenshot('hero-section')
-})
-```
-
-### Creating References
-
-When you run a visual test for the first time, Vitest creates a reference (also
-called baseline) screenshot and fails the test with the following error message:
-
-```
-expect(element).toMatchScreenshot()
-
-No existing reference screenshot found; a new one was created. Review it before running tests again.
-
-Reference screenshot:
-  tests/__screenshots__/hero.test.ts/hero-section-chromium-darwin.png
-```
-
-This is normal. Check that the screenshot looks right, then run the test again.
-Vitest will now compare future runs against this baseline.
-
-::: tip
-Reference screenshots live in `__screenshots__` folders next to your tests.
-**Don't forget to commit them!**
-:::
-
-### Screenshot Organization
-
-By default, screenshots are organized as:
-
-```
-.
-├── __screenshots__
-│   └── test-file.test.ts
-│       ├── test-name-chromium-darwin.png
-│       ├── test-name-firefox-linux.png
-│       └── test-name-webkit-win32.png
-└── test-file.test.ts
-```
-
-The naming convention includes:
-- **Test name**: either the first argument of the `toMatchScreenshot()` call,
-or automatically generated from the test's name.
-- **Browser name**: `chrome`, `chromium`, `firefox` or `webkit`.
-- **Platform**: `aix`, `darwin`, `freebsd`, `linux`, `openbsd`, `sunos`, or
-`win32`.
-
-This ensures screenshots from different environments don't overwrite each other.
-
-### Updating References
-
-When you intentionally change your UI, you'll need to update the reference
-screenshots:
-
-```bash
-$ vitest --update
-```
-
-Review updated screenshots before committing to make sure changes are
-intentional.
-
-## How Visual Tests Work
-
-Visual regression tests need stable screenshots to compare against. But pages aren't instantly stable as images load, animations finish, fonts render, and layouts settle.
-
-Vitest handles this automatically through "Stable Screenshot Detection":
-
-1. Vitest takes a first screenshot (or uses the reference screenshot if available) as baseline
-1. It takes another screenshot and compares it with the baseline
-    - If the screenshots match, the page is stable and testing continues
-    - If they differ, Vitest uses the newest screenshot as the baseline and repeats
-1. This continues until stability is achieved or the timeout is reached
-
-This ensures that transient visual changes (like loading spinners or animations) don't cause false failures. If something never stops animating though, you'll hit the timeout, so consider [disabling animations during testing](#disable-animations).
-
-If a stable screenshot is captured after retries (one or more) and a reference screenshot exists, Vitest performs a final comparison with the reference using `createDiff: true`. This will generate a diff image if they don't match.
-
-During stability detection, Vitest calls comparators with `createDiff: false` since it only needs to know if screenshots match. This keeps the detection process fast.
-
-## Configuring Visual Tests
-
-### Global Configuration
-
-Configure visual regression testing defaults in your
-[Vitest config](/config/browser/expect#tomatchscreenshot):
-
-```ts [vitest.config.ts]
-import { defineConfig } from 'vitest/config'
-
-export default defineConfig({
-  test: {
-    browser: {
-      expect: {
-        toMatchScreenshot: {
-          comparatorName: 'pixelmatch',
-          comparatorOptions: {
-            // 0-1, how different can colors be?
-            threshold: 0.2,
-            // 1% of pixels can differ
-            allowedMismatchedPixelRatio: 0.01,
-          },
-        },
-      },
-    },
-  },
-})
-```
-
-### Per-Test Configuration
-
-Override global settings for specific tests:
-
-```ts
-await expect(element).toMatchScreenshot('button-hover', {
-  comparatorName: 'pixelmatch',
-  comparatorOptions: {
-    // more lax comparison for text-heavy elements
-    allowedMismatchedPixelRatio: 0.1,
-  },
-})
-```
-
-## Best Practices
-
-### Test Specific Elements
-
-Unless you explicitly want to test the whole page, prefer capturing specific
-components to reduce false positives:
-
-```ts
-// ❌ Captures entire page; prone to unrelated changes
-await expect(page).toMatchScreenshot()
-
-// ✅ Captures only the component under test
-await expect(page.getByTestId('product-card')).toMatchScreenshot()
-```
-
-### Handle Dynamic Content
-
-Dynamic content like timestamps, user data, or random values will cause tests
-to fail. You can either mock the sources of dynamic content or mask them when
-using the Playwright provider by using the
-[`mask` option](https://playwright.dev/docs/api/class-page#page-screenshot-option-mask)
-in `screenshotOptions`.
-
-```ts
-await expect(page.getByTestId('profile')).toMatchScreenshot({
-  screenshotOptions: {
-    mask: [page.getByTestId('last-seen')],
-  },
-})
-```
-
-### Disable Animations
-
-Animations can cause flaky tests. Disable them during testing by injecting
-a custom CSS snippet:
-
-```css
-*, *::before, *::after {
-  animation-duration: 0s !important;
-  animation-delay: 0s !important;
-  transition-duration: 0s !important;
-  transition-delay: 0s !important;
-}
-```
-
-::: tip
-When using the Playwright provider, animations are automatically disabled
-when using the assertion: the `animations` option's value in `screenshotOptions`
-is set to `"disabled"` by default.
-:::
-
-### Set Appropriate Thresholds
-
-Tuning thresholds is tricky. It depends on the content, test environment,
-what's acceptable for your app, and might also change based on the test.
-
-Vitest does not set a default for the mismatching pixels, that's up for the
-user to decide based on their needs. The recommendation is to use
-`allowedMismatchedPixelRatio`, so that the threshold is computed on the size
-of the screenshot and not a fixed number.
-
-When setting both `allowedMismatchedPixelRatio` and
-`allowedMismatchedPixels`, Vitest uses whichever limit is stricter.
-
-### Set consistent viewport sizes
-
-As the browser instance might have a different default size, it's best to
-set a specific viewport size, either on the test or the instance
-configuration:
-
-```ts
-await page.viewport(1280, 720)
-```
-
-```ts [vitest.config.ts]
-import { playwright } from '@vitest/browser-playwright'
-import { defineConfig } from 'vitest/config'
-
-export default defineConfig({
-  test: {
-    browser: {
-      enabled: true,
-      provider: playwright(),
-      instances: [
-        {
-          browser: 'chromium',
-          viewport: { width: 1280, height: 720 },
-        },
-      ],
-    },
-  },
-})
-```
-
-### Use Git LFS
-
-Store reference screenshots in
-[Git LFS](https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs?tab=readme-ov-file) if you plan to
-have a large test suite.
-
-## Debugging Failed Tests
-
-When a visual test fails, Vitest provides three images to help debug:
-
-1. **Reference screenshot**: the expected baseline image
-1. **Actual screenshot**: what was captured during the test
-1. **Diff image**: highlights the differences, but this might not get generated
-
-You'll see something like:
-
-```
-expect(element).toMatchScreenshot()
-
-Screenshot does not match the stored reference.
-245 pixels (ratio 0.03) differ.
-
-Reference screenshot:
-  tests/__screenshots__/button.test.ts/button-chromium-darwin.png
-
-Actual screenshot:
-  tests/.vitest-attachments/button.test.ts/button-chromium-darwin-actual.png
-
-Diff image:
-  tests/.vitest-attachments/button.test.ts/button-chromium-darwin-diff.png
-```
-
-### Understanding the diff image
-
-- **Red pixels** are areas that differ between reference and actual
-- **Yellow pixels** are anti-aliasing differences (when anti-alias is not ignored)
-- **Transparent/original** are unchanged areas
-
-:::tip
-If the diff is mostly red, something's really wrong. If it's speckled with a
-few red pixels around text, you probably just need to bump your threshold.
-:::
-
-## Common Issues and Solutions
-
-### False Positives from Font Rendering
-
-Font availability and rendering varies significantly between systems. Some
-possible solutions might be to:
-
-- Use web fonts and wait for them to load:
-
-  ```ts
-  // wait for fonts to load
-  await document.fonts.ready
-
-  // continue with your tests
-  ```
-
-- Increase comparison threshold for text-heavy areas:
-
-  ```ts
-  await expect(page.getByTestId('article-summary')).toMatchScreenshot({
-    comparatorName: 'pixelmatch',
-    comparatorOptions: {
-      // 10% of the pixels are allowed to change
-      allowedMismatchedPixelRatio: 0.1,
-    },
-  })
-  ```
-
-- Use a cloud service or containerized environment for consistent font rendering.
-
-### Flaky Tests or Different Screenshot Sizes
-
-If tests pass and fail randomly, or if screenshots have different dimensions
-between runs:
-
-- Wait for everything to load, including loading indicators
-- Set explicit viewport sizes: `await page.viewport(1920, 1080)`
-- Check for responsive behavior at viewport boundaries
-- Check for unintended animations or transitions
-- Increase test timeout for large screenshots
-- Use a cloud service or containerized environment
-
-## Visual Regression Testing for Teams
-
-Remember when we mentioned visual tests need a stable environment? Well, here's
-the thing: your local machine isn't it.
-
-For teams, you've basically got three options:
-
-1. **Self-hosted runners**, complex to set up, painful to maintain
-1. **GitHub Actions**, free (for open source), works with any provider
-1. **Cloud services**, like
-[Azure App Testing](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/app-testing/),
-built for this exact problem
-
-We'll focus on options 2 and 3 since they're the quickest to get running.
-
-To be upfront, the main trade-offs for each are:
-
-- **GitHub Actions**: visual tests only run in CI (developers can't run them
-locally)
-- **Microsoft's service**: works everywhere but costs money and only works
-with Playwright
-
-:::: tabs key:vrt-for-teams
-=== GitHub Actions
-
-The trick here is keeping visual tests separate from your regular tests,
-otherwise, you'll waste hours checking failing logs of screenshot mismatches.
-
-### Organizing Your Tests
-
-First, isolate your visual tests. Stick them in a `visual` folder (or whatever
-makes sense for your project):
-
-```json [package.json]
-{
-  "scripts": {
-    "test:unit": "vitest --exclude tests/visual/*.test.ts",
-    "test:visual": "vitest tests/visual/*.test.ts"
-  }
-}
-```
-
-Now developers can run `npm run test:unit` locally without visual tests getting
-in the way. Visual tests stay in CI where the environment is consistent.
-
-::: tip Alternative
-Not a fan of glob patterns? You could also use separate
-[Test Projects](/guide/projects) instead and run them using:
-
-- `vitest --project unit`
-- `vitest --project visual`
-:::
-
-### CI Setup
-
-Your CI needs browsers installed. How you do this depends on your provider:
-
-::: tabs key:provider
-== Playwright
-
-[Playwright](https://npmx.dev/package/playwright) makes this easy. Just pin
-your version and add this before running tests:
-
-```yaml [.github/workflows/ci.yml]
-# ...the rest of the workflow
-- name: Install Playwright Browsers
-  run: npx --no playwright install --with-deps --only-shell
-```
-
-== WebdriverIO
-
-[WebdriverIO](https://npmx.dev/package/webdriverio) expects you to bring
-your own browsers. The folks at
-[@browser-actions](https://github.com/browser-actions) have your back:
-
-```yaml [.github/workflows/ci.yml]
-# ...the rest of the workflow
-- uses: browser-actions/setup-chrome@v1
-  with:
-    chrome-version: 120
-```
-
-:::
-
-Then run your visual tests:
-
-```yaml [.github/workflows/ci.yml]
-# ...the rest of the workflow
-# ...browser setup
-- name: Visual Regression Testing
-  run: npm run test:visual
-```
-
-### The Update Workflow
-
-Here's where it gets interesting. You don't want to update screenshots on every
-PR automatically <small>*(chaos!)*</small>. Instead, create a
-manually-triggered workflow that developers can run when they intentionally
-change the UI.
-
-The workflow below:
-- Only runs on feature branches (never on main)
-- Credits the person who triggered it as co-author
-- Prevents concurrent runs on the same branch
-- Shows a nice summary:
-  - **When screenshots changed**, it lists what changed
-
-    <img alt="Action summary after updates" img-light src="/vrt-gha-summary-update-light.png">
-    <img alt="Action summary after updates" img-dark src="/vrt-gha-summary-update-dark.png">
-
-  - **When nothing changed**, well, it tells you that too
-
-    <img alt="Action summary after no updates" img-light src="/vrt-gha-summary-no-update-light.png">
-    <img alt="Action summary after no updates" img-dark src="/vrt-gha-summary-no-update-dark.png">
-
-::: tip
-This is just one approach. Some teams prefer PR comments (`/update-screenshots`),
-others use labels. Adjust it to fit your workflow!
-
-The important part is having a controlled way to update baselines.
-:::
-
-```yaml [.github/workflows/update-screenshots.yml]
-name: Update Visual Regression Screenshots
-
-on:
-  workflow_dispatch: # manual trigger only
-
-env:
-  AUTHOR_NAME: 'github-actions[bot]'
-  AUTHOR_EMAIL: '41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com'
-  COMMIT_MESSAGE: |
-    test: update visual regression screenshots
-
-    Co-authored-by: ${{ github.actor }} <${{ github.actor_id }}+${{ github.actor }}@users.noreply.github.com>
-
-jobs:
-  update-screenshots:
-    runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
-
-    # safety first: don't run on main
-    if: github.ref_name != github.event.repository.default_branch
-
-    # one at a time per branch
-    concurrency:
-      group: visual-regression-screenshots@${{ github.ref_name }}
-      cancel-in-progress: true
-
-    permissions:
-      contents: write # needs to push changes
-
-    steps:
-      - name: Checkout selected branch
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
-        with:
-          ref: ${{ github.ref_name }}
-          # use PAT if triggering other workflows
-          # token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-
-      - name: Configure Git
-        run: |
-          git config --global user.name "${{ env.AUTHOR_NAME }}"
-          git config --global user.email "${{ env.AUTHOR_EMAIL }}"
-
-      # your setup steps here (node, pnpm, whatever)
-      - name: Setup Node.js
-        uses: actions/setup-node@v4
-        with:
-          node-version: 24
-
-      - name: Install dependencies
-        run: npm ci
-
-      - name: Install Playwright Browsers
-        run: npx --no playwright install --with-deps --only-shell
-
-      # the magic happens below 🪄
-      - name: Update Visual Regression Screenshots
-        run: npm run test:visual --update
-
-      # check what changed
-      - name: Check for changes
-        id: check_changes
-        run: |
-          CHANGED_FILES=$(git status --porcelain | awk '{print $2}')
-          if [ "${CHANGED_FILES:+x}" ]; then
-            echo "changes=true" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
-            echo "Changes detected"
-
-            # save the list for the summary
-            echo "changed_files<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
-            echo "$CHANGED_FILES" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
-            echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
-            echo "changed_count=$(echo "$CHANGED_FILES" | wc -l)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
-          else
-            echo "changes=false" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
-            echo "No changes detected"
-          fi
-
-      # commit if there are changes
-      - name: Commit changes
-        if: steps.check_changes.outputs.changes == 'true'
-        run: |
-          git add -A
-          git commit -m "${{ env.COMMIT_MESSAGE }}"
-
-      - name: Push changes
-        if: steps.check_changes.outputs.changes == 'true'
-        run: git push origin ${{ github.ref_name }}
-
-      # pretty summary for humans
-      - name: Summary
-        run: |
-          if [[ "${{ steps.check_changes.outputs.changes }}" == "true" ]]; then
-            echo "### 📸 Visual Regression Screenshots Updated" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "Successfully updated **${{ steps.check_changes.outputs.changed_count }}** screenshot(s) on \`${{ github.ref_name }}\`" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "#### Changed Files:" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "\`\`\`" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "${{ steps.check_changes.outputs.changed_files }}" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "\`\`\`" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "✅ The updated screenshots have been committed and pushed. Your visual regression baseline is now up to date!" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-          else
-            echo "### ℹ️ No Screenshot Updates Required" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "The visual regression test command ran successfully but no screenshots needed updating." >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-            echo "All screenshots are already up to date! 🎉" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-          fi
-```
-
-=== Azure App Testing
-
-Your tests stay local, only the browsers run in the cloud. It's Playwright's
-remote browser feature, but Microsoft handles all the infrastructure.
-
-### Organizing Your Tests
-
-Keep visual tests separate to control costs. Only tests that actually take
-screenshots should use the service.
-
-The cleanest approach is using [Test Projects](/guide/projects):
-
-```ts [vitest.config.ts]
-import { env } from 'node:process'
-import { defineConfig } from 'vitest/config'
-import { playwright } from '@vitest/browser-playwright'
-
-export default defineConfig({
-  // ...global Vite config
-  tests: {
-    // ...global Vitest config
-    projects: [
-      {
-        extends: true,
-        test: {
-          name: 'unit',
-          include: ['tests/**/*.test.ts'],
-          // regular config, can use local browsers
-        },
-      },
-      {
-        extends: true,
-        test: {
-          name: 'visual',
-          // or you could use a different suffix, e.g.,: `tests/**/*.visual.ts?(x)`
-          include: ['visual-regression-tests/**/*.test.ts?(x)'],
-          browser: {
-            enabled: true,
-            provider: playwright({
-              connectOptions: {
-                wsEndpoint: `${env.PLAYWRIGHT_SERVICE_URL}?${new URLSearchParams({
-                  'api-version': '2025-09-01',
-                  'os': 'linux', // always use Linux for consistency
-                  // helps identifying runs in the service's dashboard
-                  'runName': `Vitest ${env.CI ? 'CI' : 'local'} run @${new Date().toISOString()}`,
-                })}`,
-                exposeNetwork: '<loopback>',
-                headers: {
-                  Authorization: `Bearer ${env.PLAYWRIGHT_SERVICE_ACCESS_TOKEN}`,
-                },
-                timeout: 30_000,
-              }
-            }),
-            headless: true,
-            instances: [
-              {
-                browser: 'chromium',
-                viewport: { width: 2560, height: 1440 },
-              },
-            ],
-          },
-        },
-      },
-    ],
-  },
-})
-```
-
-Follow the [official guide to create a Playwright Workspace](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-testing/playwright-workspaces/quickstart-run-end-to-end-tests?tabs=playwrightcli&pivots=playwright-test-runner#create-a-workspace).
-
-Once your workspace is created, configure Vitest to use it:
-
-1. **Set the endpoint URL**: following the [official guide](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-testing/playwright-workspaces/quickstart-run-end-to-end-tests?tabs=playwrightcli&pivots=playwright-test-runner#configure-the-browser-endpoint), retrieve the URL and set it as the `PLAYWRIGHT_SERVICE_URL` environment variable.
-1. **Enable token authentication**: [enable access tokens](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-testing/playwright-workspaces/how-to-manage-authentication?pivots=playwright-test-runner#enable-authentication-using-access-tokens) for your workspace, then [generate a token](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-testing/playwright-workspaces/how-to-manage-access-tokens#generate-a-workspace-access-token) and set it as the `PLAYWRIGHT_SERVICE_ACCESS_TOKEN` environment variable.
-
-::: danger Keep that Token Secret!
-Never commit `PLAYWRIGHT_SERVICE_ACCESS_TOKEN` to your repository. Anyone with
-the token can rack up your bill. Use environment variables locally and secrets
-in CI.
-:::
-
-Then split your `test` script like this:
-
-```json [package.json]
-{
-  "scripts": {
-    "test:visual": "vitest --project visual",
-    "test:unit": "vitest --project unit"
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Running Tests
-
-```bash
-# Local development
-npm run test:unit    # free, runs locally
-npm run test:visual  # uses cloud browsers
-
-# Update screenshots
-npm run test:visual -- --update
-```
-
-The best part of this approach is that it just works:
-
-- **Consistent screenshots**, everyone uses the same cloud browsers
-- **Works locally**, developers can run and update visual tests on their machines
-- **Pay for what you use**, only visual tests consume service minutes
-- **No Docker or workflow setups needed**, nothing to manage or maintain
-
-### CI Setup
-
-In your CI, add the secrets:
-
-```yaml
-env:
-  PLAYWRIGHT_SERVICE_URL: ${{ vars.PLAYWRIGHT_SERVICE_URL }}
-  PLAYWRIGHT_SERVICE_ACCESS_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.PLAYWRIGHT_SERVICE_ACCESS_TOKEN }}
-```
-
-Then run your tests like normal. The service handles the rest.
-
-::::
-
-### So Which One?
-
-Both approaches work. The real question is what pain points matter most to your
-team.
-
-If you're already deep in the GitHub ecosystem, GitHub Actions is hard to beat.
-Free for open source, works with any browser provider, and you control
-everything.
-
-The downside? That "works on my machine" conversation when someone generates
-screenshots locally and they don't match CI expectations anymore.
-
-A cloud service makes sense if developers need to run visual tests locally.
-
-Some teams have designers checking their work or developers who prefer catching
-issues before pushing. It allows skipping the push-wait-check-fix-push cycle.
-
-Still on the fence? Start with GitHub Actions. You can always add a cloud
-service later if local testing becomes a pain point.