@vibedeckx/linux-x64 0.2.11 → 0.2.12

package/dist/bin.js

@@ -229047,6 +229047,7 @@ function buildReviewerPrompt(opts) {
   const brief = opts.intentBrief || null;
   const hasExcerpt = Boolean(intent || opts.taskContext || opts.authorSelfReport);
   const scope = opts.scope && opts.scope.changedFiles.length > 0 ? opts.scope : null;
+  const noDiffWithAnalysis = Boolean(opts.authorSelfReport) && opts.authorSelfReport.trim().length >= SELF_REPORT_MIN_CHARS;
   return [
     "You are a code reviewer agent. Another agent just completed work in this workspace; review it critically and independently.",
     brief ? `
@@ -229067,15 +229068,18 @@ ${opts.taskContext}` : null,
 ${opts.reviewFocus}` : null,
     scope ? `
 ## Scope \u2014 the change under review
+
 The reviewed turn changed exactly these files:
 ${scope.changedFiles.map((f2) => `- ${f2}`).join("\n")}
+
 It starts from commit \`${scope.startHead}\` \u2014 use \`git diff ${scope.startHead} -- <file>\` and \`git log ${scope.startHead}..HEAD\` to see the content.
-Confine your review to these files and changes. Other uncommitted or pre-existing changes in the worktree, or changes from other turns, are out of scope unless this change depends on them.` : opts.scope != null && opts.scope.changedFiles.length === 0 ? "\n## Scope \u2014 the change under review\nThe reviewed turn changed no files. Do not review unrelated uncommitted or pre-existing changes in the worktree \u2014 there is nothing in scope for this turn. If you believe the turn should have changed something, say so rather than reviewing out-of-scope code." : opts.scope === null ? "\n## Scope\nThe changed-file set could not be determined (scope unknown) \u2014 inspect `git diff`/`git status`/`git log` and judge the relevant range yourself." : null,
+
+Confine your review to these files and changes. Other uncommitted or pre-existing changes in the worktree, or changes from other turns, are out of scope unless this change depends on them.` : opts.scope != null && opts.scope.changedFiles.length === 0 ? noDiffWithAnalysis ? "\n## Scope \u2014 the change under review\n\nThe reviewed turn changed no files. Its deliverable is the analysis and proposed approach in the author self-report above, not a diff \u2014 review THAT. Verify the diagnosis against the actual code: are the cited files/lines real and the described mechanism correct? Then stress-test the proposed fix as a plan, before implementation \u2014 correctness, side-effects, and completeness. If you instead conclude the turn should have produced a code change and didn't, say so. Do not review unrelated uncommitted or pre-existing changes in the worktree." : "\n## Scope \u2014 the change under review\n\nThe reviewed turn changed no files. Do not review unrelated uncommitted or pre-existing changes in the worktree \u2014 there is nothing in scope for this turn. If you believe the turn should have changed something, say so rather than reviewing out-of-scope code." : opts.scope === null ? "\n## Scope\n\nThe changed-file set could not be determined (scope unknown) \u2014 inspect `git diff`/`git status`/`git log` and judge the relevant range yourself." : null,
     "\n## How to review",
     "- Do NOT modify any files \u2014 you are in read-only review mode.",
     "- Inspect the actual workspace state yourself: read the relevant files, run `git diff`, `git status` and `git log`.",
     reviewTargetPromptLine(opts.target),
-    "- Judge correctness, completeness against the task, and code quality. Be specific: reference files and lines.",
+    noDiffWithAnalysis ? "- Judge correctness and completeness against the task. For this analysis/plan turn the work under review is the reasoning and the proposal, not code quality of a diff. Be specific: reference files and lines." : "- Judge correctness, completeness against the task, and code quality. Be specific: reference files and lines.",
     "\nEnd your final message with a clear, actionable list of feedback items \u2014 or state explicitly that the work looks good.",
     brief ? opts.authorSelfReport ? "\n(review context: distilled intent brief + author self-report + live workspace)" : "\n(review context: distilled intent brief + live workspace)" : hasExcerpt ? "\n(review context: deterministic excerpt of the source conversation + live workspace)" : "\n(review context: live workspace only \u2014 the source conversation was unavailable)"
   ].filter((l) => l !== null).join("\n");

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@vibedeckx/linux-x64",
-  "version": "0.2.11",
+  "version": "0.2.12",
   "description": "Vibedeckx platform binaries for Linux x64",
   "os": [
     "linux"